Strong language and adult themes warning.
We’re going to talk about what homosexual acts really are, so read this after the kids have gone to bed. Ann’s choice of language here is deliberate. Just to head off the expected criticism: it is not “pornographic” but merely factually, one might say, medically descriptive. I have long been arguing that one of the reasons there is such a vast acceptance of the “nice gay men” movement is that no one is willing to actually talk clearly about what they do.
We’re going to talk about what homosexual acts really are, so read this after the kids have gone to bed. Ann’s choice of language here is deliberate. Just to head off the expected criticism: it is not “pornographic” but merely factually, one might say, medically descriptive. I have long been arguing that one of the reasons there is such a vast acceptance of the “nice gay men” movement is that no one is willing to actually talk clearly about what they do.
The homosexualist ideological movement has been very, very careful to make sure they restrict their rhetoric to being about “love” and “rights” and never, ever mention the gruesome realities in the “polite company” of the straight world they are attempting to evangelize. What is very commonly talked about in their own world, in their magazines and websites, is in public carefully shrouded. But I have read homosexual literature, and folks, they’re a LOT more … straightforward among their own constituents than Ann has been here.
When Ann and I talked about putting this article on WUWTS, we briefly worried about how people would react. But this isn’t the Remnant, and it isn’t LifeSiteNews. And this is an emergency, so it’s time for all the special snowflakes to grow up, and quick.
Right now, the men in Rome who are attempting to move the Church towards acceptance of sodomy know full well that if they talked about what they’re really talking about, the Catholic world would recoil in horror. The whole thing would be over in an hour.
But they won’t. So we have to.
HJMW
4 comments:
In "The Overhauling of the Straight America" decades ago Kirk admits that homosexual acts are disgusting. He advised sodomites to never let anyone talk about actual acts of sodomy, but to only talk about love. Recently a sodomite said to me: Yes, you are correct, we do what animals do, we do it in parks and filthy washrooms, and we will continue to do it, because it is natural.
Then Kasper talks about "being born this way". Even if one were born this way, would it follow from this, that one has to give in to those "natural" urges, especially since some animals sometimes do it as well? Has he ever asked himself, what semen is for?
The Catholic Church used to teach us that we should aspire to be like Christ, not like some animals some of the time. It used to teach us that we have reason and free will. We are born this way, unless we are born with disabilities.
Tried to follow link ,site was blocked by security as unsafe .
The spread of pornography is so bad that several years ago the Archdiocese of New York created a program to assist priests to help families when one or more were enslaved in this vice. It is apparently so wide spread that a significant minority of regular, Sunday Mass attending men are viewers. In a pornogrified society, the spread of perverted sexual practice is one outcome. Lust feeds off lust.
An open letter to Pope Francis
By Randy Engel
On a Papal Commission of Inquiry into Homosexuality, Pederasty and La Lobby Gay in The Catholic Church
9 November 2013
In an interview titled "Careerism and vanity: Sins of the Church," Tornielli's last question to you was: Can you tell us how the Roman Curia is perceived from the outside?
And you, Archbishop Jorge Mario Bergoglio, replied: "I see it as a body that gives service, a body that helps me and serves me. Sometimes negative news does come out, but it is often exaggerated and manipulated to spread scandal. Journalists sometimes risk becoming ill from coprophilia and thus fomenting coprophagia: which is a sin that taints all men and women, that is, the tendency to focus on the negative rather than the positive aspects."
Now the term "coprophilia" which you used spontaneously in the interview refers to a sexual perversion (fetish) by which a person derives sexual excitement from the presence of feces. The term "coprophagia" pertains to the actual act of eating excrement. Both paraphilias are commonly associated with homosexual behavior and are a regular feature of homosexual pornography.
That a bishop should so glibly refer to such disgusting and perverted practices in a public interview clearly indicates to me that you are not unschooled in the ways and dangers of sexual perversion, and hence, have no real need for me to instruct you on the perversity of homosexual behaviors, nor on the grave necessity of combating the Homosexual Collective and other forces of organized perversion.
And so it is with great sorrow that I bring this Open Letter to a close.
Post a Comment