Bergoglio sacks masturbating "Bishop" - Let the name Tomé Ferreira da Silva be forever shamed for the fraud he is!

A Ratzinger appointed, Bergoglio promoted "Bishop" in Brazil has been removed from episcopal ministry for engaging in self-abuse with another sodomite during a video conference.

Bispo de Rio Preto, Dom Tomé tem vídeo íntimo vazado nas redes sociais (diariodaregiao.com.br)

It's a joy to see how utterly stupid these filthy little pervert scumbags are.

Pope removes Brazil bishop after gay video - La Gazzetta del Mezzogiorno

Ratzinger and Bergoglio receive Wuhan Virus, abortion-tainted vaccine!

 

The father who abandoned his spouse and children to an evil and abusive stepfather have committed the ultimate child abuse today, not surprising since they spent years covering up abuse.

Popes Francis, Benedict receive their first doses of COVID-19 vaccine (catholicregister.org)

They took a vaccine for the Wuhan Virus that was developed using the stem lines of an aborted baby for testing. In the post one below, Thomas Cardinal Collins, Metropolitan Archbishop of Toronto stated:

Good luck boys on your particular judgement. I expect at the Last Judgement, the victim will be there to accuse you to all of us.

Vengeance is mine, and recompense, for the time when their foot shall slip;                      because the day of their calamity is at hand, their doom comes swiftly.                                                                                                                     Deuteronomy 32:35

Benedict Ratzinger's journey. Sorry, I'm not going with him.

I had a conversation the other day with a friend and fellow blogger about Francis. One of our points of discussion is that a far as the Law is concerned, Francis Bergoglio is the Pope. He is the pope according to Canon Law, he is the pope because the priests of Rome accept him as bishop, as to the bishops and cardinals in the world and the faithful. We may not like it, he may be a heretic and an apostate and an evil man and while I may think it and believe it, it is of no consequence. None of us have authority to declare and remedy it. 

We further agreed to agree that the real culprit in all of this is Joseph Ratzinger. We recalled discussions seven years ago that "he must have cancer," or, "he knows he has Alzheimer's and does not want to lead the Church in such a condition." Truly, did you not think there was something serious?

He did this to us. He ran away, he was and remains a coward. There was no "mystical" reason for his departure. He bailed out. If he was being hounded from within to leave he could have gone to the window at his Sunday Angelus and told us, we would have risen up. Italians loved him, they would have stormed the palace to save him. This is how a Catholic would act. 

No, instead he left us and did not finish his job. 

I'm not interested in this book, I'm past interest in anything Ratzinger writes or says. I loved him. Now, I am nothing but indifferent towards him. Reading this makes me even more indifferent.

We have truly been abandoned. It is this abandonment by our Shepherds, sorry, our Hirelings, that has led to the theories by Ann Barnhardt and Brother Alexis. Someone will be culpable for all of this, I have to believe that our merciful God will not lay the blame on those who question and come to conclusions that may be wrong because of the crimes of those who lead.

https://www.ncregister.com/daily-news/peter-seewalds-spiritual-and-historical-journey-with-the-pope-emeritus

Our derelict Father praised our abusive Father

"At the end of my reflections I would like to thank Pope Francis for everything he does to show us, again and again, the light of God, which has not disappeared, even today. Thank you, Holy Father!" Pope Benedict XVI

With these words, he lost me again.

How wonderful it was to read it, how clear and to the point. Yet, it failed. While there is much good in it and he goes to the heart of a lack of belief in God, he blames the 1960's without addressing the elephant in the room. That sodomites and communists came into the Church to destroy the faith of the people from within.

He knew it, he knows it.

He abandoned us and yet, he remains the Pope. He is a coward, a bad father for abandoning his children to a rapacious malefactor, a fool, a fraud, a usurper.

It is time, Father Ratzinger, long past time for you to come clean. 

Issue another letter and take back your Throne!

The shiftiness and bluster of the Bergoglian papacy

From Father Hunwicke:

https://liturgicalnotes.blogspot.ca/2018/03/like-getting-blood-out-of-stone.html

If this man Vigano were to be kept in office, it would be the final detail in the unfolding public demonstration of the moral corruption right at the heart of this failed pontificate. In politics, it is often not the big issues that bring a crisis to its head, but something that starts off as insignificant to the point of pettiness. During this Bergoglian era, the two major disasters have been the shiftiness, accompanied by unbecoming bluster, in the area of paedophilia and coverups and cronyism; and attempts to get away with perverting the Church's moral teaching by stealth. Those things matter infinitely more than the current silly and minor episode.
 But 'Lettergate' provides such a vivid snapshot of dirty little men involved in dirty little plots for thoroughly dirty purposes. Even anti-Ratzinger veterans among the Commentariat like Robert Mickens can see this.

If PF cannot be made to understand the need to clean out his own Augean Stables, surely he should be made to go. Not next week, but this week.

I would go further and say that last week would not have been too soon!

Bergoglio's lying minions: More of the "Letter" is revealed and it is not complimentary.

Yet even more of that letter from Ratzinger has been revealed and it is not complimentary. We can agree now that it was written by Joseph Ratzinger, but the attempt by the Vatican apparatchiks to manipulate it is just so revealing of this whole disgusting papacy.

All of these deceits and scandals continue and no one is held accountable. Whether it is betraying a confidential letter, lying to the world's media, consuming cocaine, masturbating child-porn aficionado's or evil filthy homosexual priests and child molesters. 

Bergoglio sits by silent.

http://www.ncregister.com/blog/edward-pentin/full-text-of-benedict-xvis-letter-to-mons.-vigano

Benedictus XVI
Pope Emeritus
Most Reverend Msgr. Dario Edoardo Viganò
Prefect of the Secretariat for Communications
Vatican City
February 7, 2018

Most Reverend Monsignor,
Thank you for your kind letter of 12 January and the attached gift of the eleven small volumes edited by Roberto Repole.
I applaud this initiative that wants to oppose and react to the foolish prejudice in which Pope Francis is just a practical man without particular theological or philosophical formation, while I have been only a theorist of theology with little understanding of the concrete life of a Christian today.
The small volumes show, rightly, that Pope Francis is a man of profound philosophical and theological formation, and they therefore help to see the inner continuity between the two pontificates, despite all the differences of style and temperament.
However, I don’t feel like writing a short and dense theological passage on them because throughout my life it has always been clear that I would write and express myself only on books I had read really well. Unfortunately, if only for physical reasons, I am unable to read the eleven volumes in the near future, especially as other commitments await me that I have already made.
Only as an aside, I would like to note my surprise at the fact that among the authors is also Professor Hünermann, who during my pontificate had distinguished himself by leading anti-papal initiatives. He played a major part in the release of the “Kölner Erklärung”, which, in relation to the encyclical “Veritatis splendour”, virulently attacked the magisterial authority of the Pope, especially on questions of moral theology. Also the “Europaische Theologengesellschaft”, which he founded, was initially conceived by him as an organization in opposition to the papal magisterium. Later, the ecclesial sentiment of many theologians prevented this orientation, allowing that organization to become a normal instrument of encounter among theologians.
I am sure you will understand my refusal and I offer you cordial greetings.
Yours,
Benedict XVI

Vatican manipulators betray Ratzinger's "Personal reserved" letter!

Oh the tangled web that Bergoglio and his minions have set for themselves. Not only did they manipulate the letter of Joseph Ratzinger, but they betrayed him in releasing it as Sandro Magister reports:

Given that Viganò gave full reading of the letter of Benedict XVI in front of numerous journalists, it should be added that on the envelope that contained it was written: "Personal reserved".

You really could not make this up.

http://magister.blogautore.espresso.repubblica.it/2018/03/15/il-doppio-stolto-pregiudizio-il-testo-integrale-della-lettera-di-benedetto-xvi-con-un-post-scriptum/

15th March

The double "foolish prejudice". The complete text of the letter of Benedict XVI. With a Post Scriptum

> English 
> English
> Español 
> Français

> All the articles of Settimo Cielo in Italian

*

The press office of the Holy See did not disclose the full text of the letter sent by Benedict XVI last February 7 to the prefect of the Secretariat for Communication, Monsignor Dario Edoardo Viganò.

Viganò, however, has read it (see photo) on the occasion of the presentation to the press of the series "Theology of Pope Francis", published by the Libreria Editrice Vaticana and made of eleven pamphlets, by various authors, on various aspects of written and oral teaching current pontiff.

The letter is dated February 7 and is in response to a previous letter from Viganò dated 12 January. But since it was announced on the evening of 12 March, the eve of the fifth birthday of the election to pope by Jorge Mario Bergoglio, the public came as if it were a sort of "vote", more than good, given by Benedict. to his successor at the end of his first five years.

This press release was also encouraged by the press release issued for the occasion by Viganò himself, who mentioned the letter only the second and third paragraphs.

In which, however, Benedict XVI rejects not one but a double "foolish prejudice": both that according to which Francis would be "only a practical man devoid of particular theological or philosophical formation", and the other according to which he himself, Joseph Ratzinger, would be " only a theorist of theology that would have understood little of the concrete life of a Christian today ".

To Francis, Benedict recognizes what is undeniable: to have had a profound "formation" in theology and philosophy. As well as recognizing an "inner continuity" between the two pontificates, where the adjective "interior" is at least as good as the noun "continuity", given "all the differences in style and temperament".

And then there is that final paragraph, omitted in the press release, in which Ratzinger, with sincere candor, gives proof of his fine vein of irony. Read it. And who wants to intend intends.

Here is the complete text of the letter, from the heading to the final signature.

*

Benedictus XVI 
Pope Emeritus

Most Rev. Mons. Dario Edoardo Viganò 
Prefect of the 
Secretariat for Communication

Vatican City 
7 February 2018

Most Reverend Monsignor,

I thank you for your kind letter of 12 January and for the attached gift of the eleven small volumes edited by Roberto Repole.

I applaud this initiative that wants to oppose and react to the foolish prejudice that Pope Francis would be only a practical man devoid of special theological or philosophical formation, while I would be only a theorist of theology that would have understood little of the concrete life of a Christian today.

The small volumes show, rightly, that Pope Francis is a man of profound philosophical and theological formation and therefore help to see the inner continuity between the two pontificates, even with all the differences in style and temperament.

However, I do not feel like writing a short and dense theological page on them because in all my life it has always been clear that I would write and express myself only on books that I had also really read. Unfortunately, even for physical reasons, I am not able to read the eleven volumes in the near future, all the more so because I am already waiting for other commitments.

I am sure he will have understanding and I greet him cordially.

His

Benedict XVI

----------

POST SCRIPTUM - Given that Viganò gave full reading of the letter of Benedict XVI in front of numerous journalists, it should be added that on the envelope that contained it was written: "Personal reserved".

Moreover, Nicole Winfield of the Associated Press found that the photo of the letter released by the Vatican was voluntarily rendered illegible in the first two lines of her last paragraph, for the remainder covered by the booklets on the theology of Pope Francis:

Bergoglio's Fake News Liars in Vatican caught red-handed manipulating the world's media and Catholic Faithful

Stunning!

These corrupt minions of Bergoglio have been caught again. The liars and manipulators are running scared now. They knew that if the world saw the real letter from Ratzinger they would doubt the credibility of the boss, Don Bergoglio. Therefore, what to do but blur it out -- blur out the lines that Ratzinger wrote that he had no time or desire to read that great depth of philosophical and theological wisdom emanating from the brain of the Argentinian boil on the Seat of Peter.

What more can one say then these malefactors are on the run. They know they've been caught long before this or they would not have manipulated it in the first place.

They are trying to make the boss look good.

It didn't work.

He looks as Peronist, as corrupt, as heretical, as stupid, as manipulative and as vindictive as ever.

Happy Fifth anniversary George. May your sixth be spent as an Emeritus sipping Mate in some seedy little bistro in the worst barrio of Buenos Aires.

VATICAN CITY (AP) — The Vatican admitted Wednesday that it altered a photo sent to the media of a letter from retired Pope Benedict XVI about Pope Francis. The manipulation changed the meaning of the image in a way that violated photojournalist industry standards.

The Vatican’s communications office released the photo of the letter on Monday on the eve of Francis’ five-year anniversary. The letter was cited by Monsignor Dario Vigano, chief of communications, to rebut critics of Francis who question his theological and philosophical heft and say he represents a rupture from Benedict’s doctrine-minded papacy.

Read the rest at:

https://apnews.com/01983501d40d47a4aa7a32b6afb70661

The Ratzingoglio Reality

Much is being written and spoken of today with regards to the preface to a series of books which includes the comment in the post below by Joseph Ratzinger. I am of the view this is not his writing because of style. None of us really know.

What I have determined is that too many of us have let Ratzinger off the hook. We loved him. We had illusions of who he was and of course, his Reform of the Reform and then Summorum Pontificum endeared us to him. He seemed to sincerely attempt to rid the Church of the "filth" and perversion, more so than any pope before him or clearly the current occupant of the papal office. Clearly, we have seen him as a father.

But the reality that we must all face is that he is a coward. A pathetic failure. A man who threw down his cross and abandoned his children to wolves, to evil men. The three links below are from people with much more time and inclination to research and report than this writer, particularly the extensive essay by Hilary White at The Remnant.

I don't profess to know the full truth but what I do know is this, it is not found to be in workings of Jorge Bergoglio.

https://remnantnewspaper.com/web/index.php/articles/item/3786-et-tu-benedict-some-final-thoughts-on-joseph-ratzinger

http://www.ncregister.com/blog/edward-pentin/full-text-of-benedict-xvis-letter-to-mons.-vigano

http://magister.blogautore.espresso.repubblica.it/2018/03/13/the-double-foolish-prejudice-the-complete-text-of-the-letter-by-benedict-xvi/

https://akacatholic.com/benedicts-letter-real-forced-or-fake/

https://onepeterfive.com/new-sources-bolster-report-that-pope-benedict-was-involved-in-synod-compromise/

Saint Jorge Bergoglio - Patron Saint of Pervert Protectors

Every Pope since 1958 is to be a Saint. This includes the current two.

How blest is our generation to have so many holy popes!

Nonsense! 

The whole process of proclaiming saints has become a fraud. It is about as credible as the Nobel Peace Prize since it was given to Hussein Obama. 

At one time, it meant that the person was in heaven. Now it is nothing more than a publicity show for a political agenda.

It is as much a fraud as the papacy of Bergoglio.

Now, Bergoglio declares his own canonization!

“There are two [recent] Bishops of Rome already Saints [John XXIII and John Paul II].  Paul VI will be a saint this year. One with the beatification cause in progress, John Paul I, his cause is open.  And Benedict and I, are on the waiting list: pray for us!”

Look at the self-satisfying grin on his face. 

Such hubris. Such arrogance from this boil on the seat of Peter. 

Behold, Pope Francis of Rome, Patron Saint of Pervert Protecting Bishops

We have been abandoned by our dad

Understand this.

Our dad abandoned our mother. He left us to be raised by another. He was a coward for abandoning us and he was selfish. He cares more about his piano and Mozart and his reading and writing than he does about you and me. He walks in a garden and contemplates. We suffer. Some say he was courageous for leaving.  What fools these are. There was nothing courageous about it. We were lied to. He lied to us. We thought he loved us. We thought he was the best darn dad we could ever have. But he betrayed us and our mother. Now, our new dad is a bully. He is abusive and vindictive and does not like us very much. He calls us names and insults us. He tells us to believe unproven science, he demands we let people who would destroy us into our house. He does not like us. He does not like our mother much either. He goes through the motions and often sneers at her for the nice clothes and perfume she wears and the way she has decorated the house. He has moved in to the family house and has taken it over. He is an abusive spouse to our mother we are now his abused and neglected children.

Got it?

http://whatisupwiththesynod.com/index.php/2017/02/18/hermeneutic-of-whatity/

The new sin according to Bergoglio - Global Warming. -- but whatever happened to Asia Bibi?

More nonsense from the mouth of the Bishop of Rome and the new corporal work of mercy. How much did George Soros pay for this?

Perhaps a few less foreign trips might reduce Bergoglio's carbon footprint. Will someone tell him that the mission of the Church is the SALVATION OF SOULS!

Bless me Father Bergoglio, for I have "sinned."

• I have used air conditioning at home and in the car and the office in order to control my asthma so that I can function during the day to take on the enormous responsibilities I have for my employees and clients.
• I consume a half tank of petrol every Sunday driving 412 kilometers to attend Mass and return home where I have been appointed to sing the Gregorian chant when I really should forsake this apostolate and attend my own local parish where they care not for the proper celebration of the Holy Mass and in fact, refused my mother's funeral because the request was that it be, in Latin.
• I threw a piece of plastic into the regular garbage last evening instead of making the extra effort to ensure that it ended up in the recycling bin even though most of what is in the recycling bin ends up in the regular garbage.
• I have failed to use compact fluorescent bulbs and maintain a stockpile of beautiful warm incandescents, enough to last me until I am 99 years old, should the good Lord above grant me the grace to live that long.

Hey Jorge, what about Asia Bibi?

The Don Bergoglio Mafia friends of the Ratzingoglian Papacy

Christopher Ferrara exposes Don Mario's mafia.

A must read.

http://remnantnewspaper.com/web/index.php/articles/item/2723-don-mario-s-moral-mafia

The Ratzingoglio Papacy II

Once, I rejoiced at the election of Joseph Ratzinger, but what he has done by renouncing the Papacy was wrong and unnecessary. Now, he is humiliated by the man that replaced him as his work is undone. I am not into the theory that he is being drugged and controlled. My post yesterday has offended some of my readers. I was harsh on him. That is the way it is. It does not mean I deny his papacy or the current one, only that it is time to stop pretending when the facts show differently.

Joseph Ratzinger was wrong. He had no business renouncing the papacy. Bergoglio would never have been elected Pope because he would have long been retired by now and Ratzinger would still be Pope. He did not have to travel to WYD or anywhere else. He abandoned his children. He could have stayed in the Vatican with a Legate undertaking the daily tasks and under the protection of the Swiss Guards. He could have taught and written and ordered what was to be done. Yes, it is that simple. His health is clearly fine, for an old man.  

Those who love him hold out hope that he will speak against what is happening. He will not. He will not speak against Amoris Laetitia, he will not speak against what will happen in October in Lund when Bergoglio goes to praise the heretic, Martin Luther.

I wondered, at one time, as a good reader in the combox expresses, if he had a supernatural experience, an apparition of Our Lady perhaps and if this is why he left. I had to have an explanation. How could he? How could he leave? It must have been the Holy Spirit - he must have had a revelation? No! I was deluding myself because I did not want to admit what Ratzinger was, a Modernist and a coward. A man who denied his cross. Just because one prays and then acts believing it to be God telling him "do this" does not make it so. It may be the other one, or it may simply be one's own desires that one has convinced oneself to do and then justifies that as "God's will." Well, it is certainly God's permissive will.

Yes, that is harsh, but that is reality.

Welcome to the Ratzingoglio Papacy - Because most Catholics are stupid enough to believe that two popes are "just fine!"

More information from Ratzinger's upcoming book is coming out. Excuse me if I find this incredulous. Were we not told that he already wrote his last book? Was he not to retire to an "emeritus" position never to be seen or heard from again? Now, he's trotted out to applaud like a trained seal the heretical bovine excrement that his successor pushes upon the Church. 

Two peas in a pod these two this Ratzinger and Bergoglio. Neither of them deserve the title, Pope and even less, "Holiness." There is nothing "holy" about these two malefactors!

John Allen at Crux is reporting that Bergoglio thinks the Catholic faithful are just fine with these "two popes." He fulfils the role of lapdog to these two clowns well. If Allen ever had any credibility he has lost it pandering to this "novelty" and doing the bidding of Ratzingoglio.

There cannot be two Popes. Bergoglio is a fraud and Ratzinger is a traitor!

A pox on both of them!

Francis says the people have spoken: ‘Two popes are just fine.

"The book carries an original preface by Pope Francis, which was published Wednesday ...
Francis goes on to say that the situation the Church finds itself in today of having two living popes, one in office and the other emeritus, is a “novelty.” He doesn’t add, perhaps because he didn’t need to, that it’s a novelty not everyone finds entirely satisfying.
From the beginning, there have been critics of the arrangement. Some argued that because there can be only one pope at a time, the right thing for Benedict to do would have been to renounce all insignia and titles associated with the office and return to being Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger.
Others feared that having a retired pope around would be divisive and destabilizing, as critics of the new pope would rally around the old one.
Certainly there has been a bit of that in some quarters, and there are still some writers and theologians to this day who question the validity of Benedict’s resignation and thus whether Francis is actually a legitimate pope. ...
There were howls of protest recently when Archbishop Georg Gänswein, Benedict’s long time aide, made the seemingly common-sense suggestion that the new situation implies an expanded Petrine ministry, with an active member and a contemplative one. Some appeared to see it almost as the prelude to a putsch, if not a schism.
Francis is obviously aware of that reaction, and in effect his preface to the new Benedict biography delivers his response.
“Since they love each other,” Francis says of having two popes, “it’s a beautiful novelty.”
“In a certain sense,” he says, “it expresses in a particularly clear way the continuity of the Petrine ministry, without interruption, like links in a single chain forged by love.”
Then, Francis comes to what he apparently sees as the popular bottom line.
“The holy people of God, on the path, have understood this very well,” he asserts.
In terms of how he knows what people think, here’s what he says: “Every time the emeritus pope has appeared in public, at my invitation, and I was able to embrace him in front of everyone, the joy and the applause of those present has been sincere and intense.”
Francis’ conviction seems to be that while theologians, ecclesiologists and bloggers may be perplexed or perturbed, the ordinary people of God aren’t. They love Benedict just as they love Francis, in part for who they are, but perhaps even more for what they represent. 

...

https://cruxnow.com/analysis/2016/08/27/francis-says-people-spoken-two-popes-just-fine/