Reuters is reporting that the Bishop of Rome stumbled yesterday at Mass at the Lateran Basilica on his way up to the altar for the
celebration of the Feast of its dedication. This is the second time in three
days, the first being Saturday at St. Peter's Basilica. He is aging, stressed no doubt, and may have a brain tumour. We have sympathy for him as a man.
But let me be perfectly clear; he has stumbled in more ways than this.
If there had been any doubt that his appointment of Jozef de
Kesel as Archbishop of Mechelen-Brussels is a disaster for the faith, erase
it from your Catholic mind. The man is a heretic and advocate of sacrilege.
If an archbishop-elect thinks the word "mercy"
is "somewhat condescending",
what must he think of words such as "sin", "damnation",
"hell", and "orthodoxy"? We don't know for certain, but perhaps
that is just as well, if only for the sake of keeping one's stomach comments in
place. The prelate in question is Jozef De Kesel of Mechelen-Brussels,
interviewed by Kerknet and translated into English by Mark de Vries of "In
Caelo et in Terra", who covers Catholic news in the Netherlands. The
fuller quote: You did not take part in the Synod on the family, but will
probably get to work with its proposals. What will stay with you from this
Synod? “The Synod may not have brought the concrete results that
were hoped for, such as allowing divorced and remarried Catholics to receive
Communion. But it is unbelievable how much it was a sign of a Church that has
changed. The mentality is really not the same anymore. I may be a careful person, but I do not think we should be
marking time. Mercy is an important word for me, but in one way or another it
is still somewhat condescending. I like to take words like respect and esteem
for man as my starting point. And that may be a value that we, as Christians,
share with prevailing culture.”
De Kesel needs to be concerned more with esteem for Christ, than "esteem for man." He needs to have some concern for his own soul as well.
Sandro Magister also reports of a little Jesuitical infighting. It seems there are a few Catholic Jesuits left in the world.
Anthony Spadaro, S.J., of the #SpadaroBlockParty which is not quite as busy as
the #RosicaBlockParty which actually trended on Twitter a few weeks back, is not one of them. He is the cause of this little storm. The reader may recall our work of this past Saturday on Spadaro based upon Magister's previous letter. The conclusion can
only be that Spadaro is, in fact, speaking for the Bishop of Rome and that can
be confirmed by the challenge thrown at him by his brother Jesuit at Boston College,
of all places.
Particularly striking was the peremptoriness with which Fr.
Spadaro drew from the “Relatio finalis” of the synod - a text in effect open to
multiple interpretations - a one-way orientation: in favor of communion for the
divorced and remarried. The following commentary, however, shows how the director of
“La Civiltà Cattolica” and confidant of Francis cannot disguise the fact that
his conclusions contradict “the teaching of the Church” that the “Relatio
sinodi” itself insists must be respected. In particular, he shows how one cannot shield oneself behind
a few lines of John Paul II’s “Familiaris consortio” to draw conclusions
opposed to those that are written there. The author of the commentary is a priest of the diocese of
New York, Robert P. Imbelli, professor emeritus of theology at Boston College
and an authoritative contributor to “L'Osservatore Romano,” in addition to
“America” and “Commonweal.” An author of works of Christology and of Trinitarian and
liturgical theology, his latest book is entitled: "Rekindling the Christic
Imagination: Theological Meditations for the New Evangelisation".
It's only Tuesday and it's been quite a good start to the week revealing
to all, the heresiarchs and homosexualists amongst us in the Church. We've had
an abomination, blasphemy and sacrilege in New York City at Our Saviour Church with the Hindu ritual, the same Archdiocese's Cardinal Dolan dancing it up withthe Rockette's (hey, their women, let's cut him some slack), the dear in the
headlights Diarmuid Martin in Dublin telling all that the Church "must
change" and the little episode yesterday in Buffalo promoting the sodomite agenda which the pastor deny but photos betray.
But it does not stop there. Earlier today in Florence, the Bishop of Rome spoke at the Fifth National Ecclesial Convention Annual saying once again resurrecting his lectures that those who follow the law are Pelagians. Edward Pentin has the story at National Catholic Register. So there we have it. Follow the two thousand year old Law of the Church, obey and preach the Ten Commandments and the words of Jesus, "If you love me, keep my commandments" and you're a Pharisee. Disagree with Francis of Rome, you're a Pelagian. You think that you're "superior" and you're not following the "breath of the spirit." I urge you to read The Radical Catholic's post on this speech drawing the parallels between Jorge Bergoglio and Martin Luther regarding their views on the Catholic Church and the heresy of Pelagianism. Here is a quote courtesy of Southern Orders where you can also more:
“We are not living in an era of change
but a change of era. ... Before the problems of the church it is not useful to
search for solutions in conservatism or fundamentalism, in the restoration of
obsolete conduct and forms that no longer have the capacity of being
significant culturally. ... Christian doctrine is not a closed system incapable
of generating questions, doubts, interrogatives — but is alive, knows being
unsettled, enlivened, ... It has a face that is not rigid, it has a body that
moves and grows, it has a soft flesh: it is called Jesus Christ.”
For a complete repudiation of Jorge Bergoglio's statement today, given on All Saints Day visit:
There, did you drink it in? Do you have the Faith of Our Fathers or do you wish to sing a new church into being by these "modernist tyrants" where "even the documents of Vatican II and St. John Paul II are passé."
Do not be discouraged, all of this must come out. Do not let it get you down, Keep faith in Our Lord and His promise that the "gates of Hell will not prevail." Rejoice that we have this vehicle, the Internet - blogs, Facebook, Twitter, Email -- all these tools that our parents and grandparents did not have.
The Reuters story on the stumbling Bishop of Rome refers to
the reputed tumour, perhaps, in its denial, the Vatican, “doth protest too much.” If the Pope has a brain tumour there is no way he should be making any decisions along the lines of what Spadaro, Kasper and De Kesel advocate. These men are heretics and malefactors. Does Francis really want to seek counsel from them? Will he soon make De Kesel, Cardinal and add to that the heresiarch and homosexualist Cupich for good measure? Now that Danneels is well over 80 and Cardinal George is dead, what is stopping him. Will he make the faithful Archbishops in Philadelphia and Montreal Cardinals, or will he bypass them because they stand for the faith?
He muses about a short papacy. May it be so. Not that I wish him any ill will, not at all. May he be inspired by to go for that slice of pizza and mate at a little cafe in Buenos Aires. He should consider it before December 8 and the gross insult to Our Blessed Mother with the motu proprio on Catholic Divorce.
Benedict XVI has shown him the way. The door is open to him.
Archbishop Diarmuid Martin is somewhat unhappy that the next generation of molesters, buggers and sodomite rapists has been found out.
