The other is a wretched imposter and heretic.
The fact is, they are both bad fathers. One abandoned his children, the stepfather abuses them.
"By the way, in the same year as Francis – who from 2013
onward usually only referred to himself as “Bishop of Rome” – ordered that
Pachamama demon idol bowl placed on the altar of St. Peter’s Basilica, a thing
hard to imagine a Vicar of Christ doing, he also dropped the title “Vicar of
Christ” from his own person, relegating it to a “historical title”. Father John Zuhlsdorf
What does this writer think?
I had never heard of Jorge Bergoglio until he came out on the loggia. I had chills, and nausea and wanted to vomit, for hours. I knew something was wrong, very wrong.
I came to a conclusion long before the munus/ministerium debate - as I am not Latinist, far from it. I can translate enough to understand what I am singing. The conclusion was conflicted and based on both interior awareness and practical logic. Benedict XVI was and remains the Vicar of Christ, Bergoglio was elected as the Bishop of Rome and thus, in practical law is the Bishop of Rome. As Father Zuhlsdorf writes, we should not be confused too much over the word, Pope, after all, Thomas Collins once reportedly said, "I am the pope in Toronto." Pope, means papa, which could be extended that even the parish priest is pope of the parish.
This is still my belief. Josef Ratzinger is Pope Benedict XVI, the "sweet Vicar of Christ on Earth," to quote St. Catherine of Sienna.
The Law says that Jorge Bergoglio is the Bishop of Rome, that he is. He has the power.
The Law says that the Bishop of Rome is the Pope.
In other words, "the law, is an ass."
UPDATED;
MORE ON THE DEBATE HERE:
AND: