Bergoglio and his Tucho "Cardinal" Fernández Orgasmic Theology

Oh my. How would he know?

Stinking pervert.

Francis and Fernández Can't Get Enough Orgasms – Gloria.tv

Francis and Fernández Can't Get Enough Orgasms

The more Francis' chief ideologue Tucho Fernández lies, the more he gets entangled in his web of lies. When the scandal over his 1995 book “Sáname con tu boca. El arte de besar” (Heal me with your mouth. The art of kissing) broke, Tucho dismissed the book as a one-off sin of youth.

But then his 1998 orgasm book “La pasión mística” was discovered. Tucho again presented it as a singular mistake of his youth. But he was 36 years old.

Now, LaNuovaBq.it has discovered that at least three publications which Tucho produced after 1998 also indulge in fantasies about orgasms and fetishes, proving that Francis' right-hand man is a sexual exhibitionist.

In his 2004 book “Para liberarte de la ansiedad y de la impaciencia”, Tucho writes:

"When our whole being is unified in one direction, then we come to true encounter, fusion, perfect union, even if only for a few minutes. It is not necessarily a matter of physical stillness, because this experience can also occur in the midst of the excitement of a very intense activity. This happens, for example, in the orgasm between two people who love each other.”

In the 2004 essay “Teología espiritual encarnada : profundidad espiritual en acción”, Tucho writes that “the moments of life and joy - including sexual ones - are experienced as a participation in the full life of the Resurrection” and then continues:

“These moments of shared pleasure, with all their potential for communication, offering, and loving expression, can be prepared and then lived in gratitude in moments of shared prayer. They cannot be separated from the relationship with God, as if they were simply a permitted sin. The mystery of the Incarnation, which makes marriage a sacrament, an efficacious sign of the grace accomplished in genital union, shows how God, by becoming [celibate] man, also entered into human flesh, transforming corporeality into the mediation of grace. Therefore, if the union of the bodies was a true expression of love, it must be celebrated in prayer.”

Tucho then invited his readers to “relax the body” by giving “full attention” to the various organs: “It is more a question of ‘feeling’ them, of perceiving them with sensitivity. It is a matter of experiencing the sensations of each organ calmly, without judging whether these sensations are good or bad, but trying to make that organ relax.” Among the organs, he mentions are “the pelvis, the buttocks, the genitals”.

His conclusion: “At every point on the body we should feel some sensation (of heat, burning, pleasure). No part of the skin is insensitive, even if the sensations are very subtle. Finally, it is important to try to grasp the totality of the organism, to become aware of the whole body and to feel it for a while.”

One wonders, who Tucho is writing this for. Perhaps for himself?

In his 2002 book “Por qué no termino de sanarme?” he philosophises about clothing that “awakens sensuality by highlighting interesting shapes of the body.” His examples: “The naked neck is made more sensual by wearing a necklace on it.”

And: “If we add to this a certain amount of imagination on the part of the viewer, and in a moment of dissatisfaction, when he needs to be moved or to enjoy something, then a body can appear as something impressive, wonderful, indispensable.”

Tucho even explains to the bored reader his personal preferences for body features: “At some moments in my life I am attracted to certain types of charm, but at another moment other details begin to attract me: sometimes the sensitivity of the moment attracts me to fine, white hands; at other times I am more attracted to fleshy, warm hands, and these fine hands are no longer enough for me.”

He agrees that the solution to this problem is not to use others and leave them when I no longer need them, but to use the imagination, which “can make what is limited, like all the creatures on this earth, appear as something divine”.

Hey boys, thanks for covering me up for surrounding myself with perverts and the fact that I cover up for them.

 Yes, he said this.

The Sunset of a Papacy?

The most repugnant papacy in half a millenia. A papacy of heresy, confusion, insult, betrayal, cover-up, pervert empowerment and corruption. 

As the psalmist wrote: "May his days be few and another his bishopric take."

And may he repent for all the disgusting and brutish actions or suffer the consequences.

RORATE CÆLI: The Sunset of a Papacy. Pope Francis also has his fans against him. By Antonio Socci (rorate-caeli.blogspot.com)

Bergoglio's Vatican betrays the Blessed Mother and praises the devil Mahomet

Is there anything else that this evil monster won't do? What a disgusting, blasphemous pathetic man. No sane Catholic would ever do this. 

May God deliver us from this false shepherd.

"The same folks to bring you “Abrahamism”—the idea that Judaism, Christianity, and Islam are intricately connected—have narrowed their sights on promoting Mary, the mother of Christ, as “a Jewish, Christian and Muslim woman,” in the words of Catholic priest Fr. Gian Matteo of the Pontifical International Marian Academy. In a ten-week webinar series titled “Mary, a model for faith and life for Christianity and Islam,” the academy will seek to present Mary as a bridge between the two religions."

"If few Christians today know about this Islamic claim, medieval Christians living in Muslim-occupied nations were certainly aware of it. There, Muslims regularly threw this fantasy in the face of Catholic and Orthodox Christians who venerated Mary as the “Eternal Virgin.” Thus, Eulogius of Cordoba, an indigenous Christian of Muslim-occupied Spain, once wrote, “I will not repeat the sacrilege which that impure dog [Muhammad] dared proffer about the Blessed Virgin, Queen of the World, holy mother of our venerable Lord and Savior. He claimed that in the next world he would deflower her.”

From Raymond Ibrahim ...

Vatican Betrays Virgin Mary for Prophet Muhammad – PJ Media

Statue in the Church of Our Lady in Dendermonde, Flanders (Belgium). They show the late 17th-century pulpit, sculpted in wood by Mattheus van Beveren.  The person subdued by the angels and having a Koran in his hands is Mohammed. The sculpture represents the triumph of Christianity over Islam.  

If you work at the Vatican, get the needle or get a new job!

Bishop of Rome Bergoglio's minions have threatened Vatican staff with dismissal describing it as "interruption of employment" if those without valid medical exclusion refuse to take the Chinese Communist Party virus, gene-therapy injection.

The so-called "vaccines" which alter a person's genetic make-up and not provide the traditional infective protein, have been tested using the stem lines of hundreds of children murdered in the womb.

Bergoglio and his alleged theologians have twisted themselves in pretzels to justify that the "vaccine" is ethical and is not a cooperation with evil. Allegedly, Bergoglio and Ratzinger have both taken it.

Vatican mandates COVID vaccine for employees (catholicregister.org)

Not only have these two benefited, allegedly, from the death of those children, they have recommended it to all of us and have threatened the rights of those in their employ who will have conscientious objection to it for the abortion matter or concern over its safety.

Their judgement will be most severe.

May the LORD free us soon from these evil men and those who would ally to follow them. May JESUS CHRIST THE KING destroy convert or destroy these wicked clerics and send us a holy pope to restore the Church and our societies. 

ROME (AP) — The Vatican is taking Pope Francis’ pro-vaccine stance very seriously: Any Vatican employee who refuses to get a coronavirus shot without a valid medical reason risks being fired. 

A Feb. 8 decree signed by the governor of the Vatican city-state says that employees who opt out of vaccination without a proven medical reason could be subject to a sanction up to and including “the interruption of the relationship of employment.” 

The directive cited the need to protect Vatican employees in the workplace, as well as guidelines issued by Francis’ advisory COVID-19 commission, which said individuals have a moral responsibility to get vaccinated “given that refusing a vaccine can constitute a risk for others.” 

The decree sparked heated debate Thursday, since its provisions go well beyond the generally voluntary nature of COVID-19 vaccinations in Italy and much of the rest of the world. The Vatican is an absolute monarchy in the heart of Rome that operates independently of Italian law and Italian labor protections. 

In a statement late Thursday responding to questions about the decree, the Vatican City State governorate’s office defended the measure but denied it infringed on the rights of employees. It said it was issued as an urgent response to a public health crisis and reflected the need to protect individual workers and the broader community. 

The statement said the reference to a 2011 norm allowing for the possible firing of an employee who refuses preventive health care measures was not punitive in nature. Rather, the statement said, it is “a tool providing a flexible and proportional response to the need to balance the health care of the collective with the freedom of choice, without resorting to any repressive means vis a vis the employee.” 

Some Catholics and other believers have expressed faith-based concerns about vaccines because some of the ones available were indirectly connected to research that used aborted fetal cells. The Vatican’s doctrine office has judged it morally acceptable for Catholics to receive COVID-19 vaccines, including those that relied on research that used cells derived from aborted fetuses. 

Vaccines are not mandatory in Italy, where Europe’s coronavirus outbreak erupted this time last year and which has the highest pandemic death toll of any European country except Britain. Some doctors and nurses who have expressed anti-vaccine sentiments or skepticism about the virus have been threatened with professional sanctions. 

The Italian government’s bioethics committee said in November that while it couldn’t rule out the need to require vaccines for members of highly exposed groups, such as medical personnel, any move to mandate COVID-19 jabs must be “discussed within their professional associations and be revoked as soon as there is no longer a significant risk for the collective.” 

The Vatican, which has around 5,000 employees, is on its way to becoming perhaps the first country to complete its adult vaccination campaign. The Holy See’s health service began inoculating staff member and their families in January with the Pfizer vaccine. Francis himself has received both of the needed doses, and the Vatican has expanded its vaccine offerings to also cover homeless people in the area. 

Francis has frequently spoken about the need to ensure that vaccines are widely available, especially to the poor and marginalized.

"Pope" Francis congratulates and blesses "President-elect" Biden

Tell us, Your Holiness; when you gave your blessing to Mr. Biden, did you counsel him or admonish him on his position on the murder of innocents in the womb?

Joe Biden is an openly dissenting Catholic and an illegitimate president.

Bergoglio and his scum blame Viganò? May God in heaven send his wrath and judgement upon these evil men!

The long delayed report on the sodomite pervert, rapist and criminal Theodore McCarrick has been released. Dr. Taylor Marshall questions the timing of the release - when America is so preoccupied with the issue of a fraudulent election and a literal globalist coup, the demonic Bergoglio and his minions release the report which they trust will be ignored due to overwhelming information. Dr. Marshall's job, the job of those at LifeSiteNews, my job, your job, is to ensure that this does not happen.

I have not and will not read the report. We have trusted people such as Dr. Robert Moynihan, Dr. Marshall and Dorothy Cummings McLean and others have and will provide erudite commentary and disclosure.

What we do know is this. It is an exercise in obfuscation and cover-up and blame. Bergoglio is the hero when in fact, he is a fraud and guilty of cover-up. They blame John Paul II for not acting. I do too. He refused to believe that Maciel was the monster he was and the excuse of these matters tainting his view due to his familiarity with communist tactics does not fly with me. He knew, he did not act. The same people that declared him a Saint did the same to Giovanni Montini and Angelo Roncalli. 

Saints? Bullcrackers! 

Never forget this picture of these bosom buddies. 

Bergoglio and his rats have tried to turn the tables to blame Archbishop Viganò, the man who is in hiding, the man who has clearly made amends for any sin of omission, a man who has shone light on this Vatican filth.

Here is his response. Expect more from him. He knows much and as with President Donald John Trump, these men are heroes who have not yet finished their work. Get your popcorn, the outing of the Deep State and the Deep Church is going to be biblical, literally!

 

Today the official Report of the Holy See regarding the McCarrick case has been made public. Before I express myself on its merit, I will take time to analyze its content. 

However, I cannot fail to note the surreal operation of mystification regarding who are the ones responsible for covering up the scandals of the deposed American cardinal, and at the same time, I cannot help expressing my indignation in seeing the same accusations of cover-up being made against me, when in fact I repeatedly denounced the inaction of the Holy See in the face of the gravity of the accusations concerning McCarrick’s conduct. 

An unprejudiced commentator would note the more than suspicious timing of the report’s publication, as well as the attempt to throw discredit upon me, accused of disobedience and negligence by those who have every interest in delegitimizing the one who brought to light an unparalleled network of corruption and immorality. The effrontery and fraudulent character shown on this occasion would seem to require, at this point, that we call this suggestive reconstruction of the facts “The Viganò Report,” sparing the reader the unpleasant surprise of seeing reality adulterated once again. But this would have required intellectual honesty, even before love for justice and the truth. 

Unlike many characters involved in this story, I do not have any reason to fear that the truth will contradict my denunciations, nor am I in any way blackmailable. Anyone who launches unfounded accusations with the sole purpose of distracting the attention of public opinion will have the bitter surprise of finding that the operation conducted against me will not have any effect, other than giving further proof of the corruption and bad faith of those who for too long have been silent, made denials and turned their gaze elsewhere, who today must be held accountable. The Vatican fiction continues. 

+ Carlo Maria Viganò, Archbishop                                                                                                                 November 10, 2020

Bergoglio and his Christ-hating globalist plan for "education!"

Not once. Not once does he mention Our Lord Jesus Christ. 

https://press.vatican.va/content/salastampa/it/bollettino/pubblico/2020/10/15/0527/01219.html?fbclid=IwAR3mvRnTZdLfDLyqa1LCKvE9TcP49cudoxHWbeJWC1meo_FEfqBb_PjwqCo#ing

Dear Brothers and Sisters, 

When I invited you to begin this process of preparation, consultation and planning for a global pact on education, we could never have imagined the situation that has developed in the meantime. The Covid crisis has accelerated and magnified many of the issues and needs that we had identified, and has uncovered numerous others as well. Concerns about health care are now accompanied by economic and social concerns. Educational systems worldwide have felt the effects of the pandemic at every level. 

Attempts have been made everywhere to offer a rapid response through online educational platforms. These have brought to light a marked disparity in educational and technological opportunities, but they have also made us realize that, due to the lockdown and many other already existing needs, large numbers of children and adolescents have fallen behind in the natural process of schooling. Recent statistics from international agencies have led some to speak, perhaps somewhat hastily, of an “educational catastrophe”, inasmuch as some ten million children were forced to leave school as a result of the economic crisis caused by the coronavirus. This has only increased an already alarming gap (with over 250 million school age children excluded from all educational activities). 

Faced with this dramatic situation, we know that necessary health care measures will prove inadequate unless accompanied by a new cultural model. We have become more conscious of the need to change our model of development. In order to ensure that the dignity of the human person is respected and protected, development ought to start from the opportunity that global interdependence offers to communities and peoples to care for our common home and to foster peace. We are experiencing a comprehensive crisis that cannot be reduced or limited to any single sector. It affects everything. The pandemic has led us to realize that what is really in crisis is our way of understanding reality and of relating to one another. 

Here it is evident that neither simplistic solutions nor wishful thinking will do. Education, as we know, is meant to be transformative. To educate is to take a risk and to hold out to the present a hope that can shatter the determinism and fatalism that the selfishness of the strong, the conformism of the weak and the ideology of the utopians would convince us is the only way forward. 

To educate is always an act of hope, one that calls for cooperation in turning a barren and paralyzing indifference into another way of thinking that recognizes our interdependence. If our educational systems are presently marked by a mindset of replacement and repetition, and are incapable of opening up new horizons in which hospitality, intergenerational solidarity and the value of transcendence can give birth to a new culture, would this not signify that we are failing to take advantage of the opportunity offered by this historic moment? 

We also know that the journey of life calls for hope grounded in solidarity. All change requires a process of education in order to create new paradigms capable of responding to the challenges and problems of the contemporary world, of understanding and finding solutions to the needs of every generation, and in this way contributing to the flourishing of humanity now and in the future. 

We consider education to be one of the most effective ways of making our world and history more human. Education is above all a matter of love and responsibility handed down from one generation to another. 

As such, education is a natural antidote to the individualistic culture that at times degenerates into a true cult of the self and the primacy of indifference. Our future cannot be one of division, impoverishment of thought, imagination, attentiveness, dialogue and mutual understanding. That cannot be our future. 

Today, there is need for a renewed commitment to an education that engages society at every level. Let us heed the plea of the young, which opens our eyes to both the urgent need and the exciting opportunity of a renewed kind of education that is not tempted to look the other way and thus favour grave social injustices, violations of rights, terrible forms of poverty and the waste of human lives. 

What is called for is an integral process that responds to those situations of loneliness and uncertainty about the future that affect young people and generate depression, addiction, aggressiveness, verbal hatred and bullying. This entails a shared journey that is not indifferent to the scourge of violence, the abuse of minors, the phenomenon of child marriage and child soldiers, the tragedy of children sold into slavery. To say nothing of the “sufferings” endured by our planet as a result of a senseless and heartless exploitation that has led to a grave environmental and climatic crisis. 

At certain moments in history, it is necessary to make radical decisions that can shape not only our way of life but above all our stance in the face of possible future scenarios. Amid the present health crisis – and the poverty and confusion it has caused – we believe that it is time to subscribe to a global pact on education for and with future generations. This calls for a commitment on the part of families, communities, schools, universities, institutions, religions, governments and the entire human family to the training of mature men and women. 

Today, we are called to have the necessary parrhesía to leave behind superficial approaches to education and the many short-cuts associated with utility, (standardized) test results, functionality and bureaucracy, which confuse education with instruction and end up atomizing our cultures. Instead, we should aim to impart an integral, participatory and polyhedral culture. We need the courage to generate processes that consciously work to overcome the existing fragmentation and the conflicts that we all bring with us. We need the courage to renew the fabric of relationships for the sake of a humanity capable of speaking the language of fraternity. The value of our educational practices will be measured not simply by the results of standardized tests, but by the ability to affect the heart of society and to help give birth to a new culture. A different world is possible and we are called to learn how to build it. This will involve every aspect of our humanity, both as individuals and in our communities. 

Let us appeal in particular to men and women of culture, science and sport, artists and media professionals in every part of the world to join in supporting this compact and promoting by their own testimony and efforts the values of care for others, peace, justice, goodness, beauty, acceptance and fraternity. “We should not expect everything from those who govern us, for that would be childish. We have the space we need for co-responsibility in creating and putting into place new processes and changes. Let us take an active part in renewing and supporting our troubled societies. Today we have a great opportunity to express our innate sense of fraternity, to be Good Samaritans who bear the pain of other people’s troubles rather than fomenting greater hatred and resentment” (Fratelli Tutti, 77). This calls for a pluralistic and multifaceted process in which all of us can work to provide meaningful responses, in which diversity and methods are harmonized in the pursuit of the common good. The ability to create harmony: that is what is needed today. 

For these reasons, we commit ourselves personally and in common: 

· First, to make human persons in their value and dignity the centre of every educational programme, both formal and informal, in order to foster their distinctiveness, beauty and uniqueness, and their capacity for relationship with others and with the world around them, while at the same time teaching them to reject lifestyles that encourage the spread of the throwaway culture. 

· Second, to listen to the voices of children and young people to whom we pass on values and knowledge, in order to build together a future of justice, peace and a dignified life for every person. 

· Third, to encourage the full participation of girls and young women in education. 

· Fourth, to see in the family the first and essential place of education. 

· Fifth, to educate and be educated on the need for acceptance and in particular openness to the most vulnerable and marginalized. 

· Sixth, to be committed to finding new ways of understanding the economy, politics, growth and progress that can truly stand at the service of the human person and the entire human family, within the context of an integral ecology. 

· Seventh, to safeguard and cultivate our common home, protecting it from the exploitation of its resources, and to adopt a more sober lifestyle marked by the use of renewable energy sources and respect for the natural and human environment, in accordance with the principles of subsidiarity, solidarity and a circular economy. 

Finally, dear brothers and sisters, we want to commit ourselves courageously to developing an educational plan within our respective countries, investing our best energies and introducing creative and transformative processes in cooperation with civil society. In this, our point of reference should be the social doctrine that, inspired by the revealed word of God and Christian humanism, provides a solid basis and a vital resource for discerning the paths to follow in the present emergency. 

The goal of this educational investment, grounded in a network of humane and open relationships, is to ensure that everyone has access to a quality education consonant with the dignity of the human person and our common vocation to fraternity. It is time to look to the future with courage and hope. May we be sustained by the conviction that education bears within itself a seed of hope: the hope of peace and justice; the hope of beauty and goodness; the hope of social harmony. 

Let us not forget, brothers and sisters, that great changes are not produced from behind desks or in offices. No. There is an “architecture” of peace to which various institutions and individuals in society all contribute, each according to its own area of expertise, without excluding anyone (cf. Fratelli Tutti, 231). In this way, we must move forward, all of us together, each as we are, but always looking ahead to the building of a civilization of harmony and unity, in which there will be no room for the terrible pandemic of the throw-away culture. Thank you.

Where did Bergoglio get $20,000.000.00 to lose?

THE RICH POPE IN AN INCREASINGLY POOR CHURCH ...

 30 September 2020 Posted by Marco Tosatti   

Marco Tosatti 

Dear Stilum curiali, 

Big Piece has found some good news. That is, he simply read it in La Repubblica; but with his usual acumen, he immediately pointed out its importance, in today's panorama of the Church in which the main topic now appears - in addition to migrants and ecology - money. I remember that John Paul II, when he died, left very little. some object. And if I remember correctly, he had never had a bank account in his life ... not even as a dad. Other times, other popes ... 

POPE RICH IN AN INCREASINGLY POOR CHURCH 

Bergoglio's "black" funds? 

This time the Pope's newspaper, the REPUBLIC, perhaps without realizing it, has made it big. 

In the eagerness to support and defend the poor pope, a meek, patient, merciful sparrow, innocent of everything, surrounded by vultures who deceive, betray, circumvent, exploit, etc. it damaged him not a little with an output worthy of the most sophisticated experts in religious hermeneutics. 

Headline on the front page in four columns: “HERE'S HOW THE POPE STOLEN MONEY”, subtitle: “They even withdrew £ 20 million from the Pontiff's confidential account”. 

Unbelievable! Does the Pope have a confidential account? 

An account of 20,000,000 pounds? (Twenty million pounds, about 45 billion old lire). 

But then the pauperist, egalitarian, migratory, ecological pope is very rich! 

And where did all these pounds come from? and what are they for? But why does a Pope have a "confidential" account? In pounds then. 

Damn, I said to myself, the Pope earns well, not like the president of INPS! 

But how come in pounds? Is her salary paid by Queen Elizabeth? How many suspects, mamma mia, thanks to these real estate transactions made in London ... 

When, it is said, John Paul II financially supported Solidarnosc, he did not do it with a confidential account ... 

But do you want to see that these are Bergoglio's "black funds" (deposited in a tax haven "alla carbonara e alla amatriciana"), in pounds because he doesn't trust the euro and the dollar? 

I would also like to point out that Repubblica's curious disturbing morbid attention to protecting Pope Bergoglio weakens the figure of the Pope of the holy Roman Catholic Apostolic Church.

But did they just fall for it by mistake or did they do it on purpose? Do you want to see that Repubblica simulates support for Bergoglio to destroy the pope and the papacy? Poor fellow, our Rafael Brotero will write, his friend Scalfari also cheated him ... 

Continually explaining that Bergoglio has been cheated and circumvented continuously and in every activity by a mass of criminals, for 7 years, Repubblica seems to be defending Bergoglio, but it makes the figure of a Pope lose credibility, who lets himself be fooled by everyone, including his friends , for seven years. And all this in a Church made up of scammers, criminals & co. Disturbing, isn't it? 

By saying that they stole 20 million pounds from him, Repubblica seems to say that there are thieves around him, but also that he had a treasure, in his reserved account, 20 million pounds ... 

While the "clericalissima" Repubblica headlines its exhilarating defense of Bergoglio on the front page in four columns, plus the first two entire subsequent pages ("The sack of the Vatican. The Pope's account also emptied"), the most secular (and disappointed by Bergoglio) Corriere, on the other hand, deals with the real issues of the country (“The industrialists press Conte”) relegating the financial stories of Bergoglio, Becciu & co to the inside pages of the news (page 24). 

Readers of the Corriere are more interested in poor Italy and poor Italians, rather than the rich Pope in a poor Church. Curiously, this seems to interest only the Republic. 

https://translate.googleusercontent.com/translate_c?depth=2&nv=1&pto=aue&rurl=translate.google.com&sl=it&sp=nmt4&tl=en&u=https://www.marcotosatti.com/2020/09/30/pg-il-papa-ricco-in-una-chiesa-sempre-piu-povera/&usg=ALkJrhgTImW0y41deeSPXVE6KaLAAYTYgQ

Bergoglio: The RED Pope by Elizabeth Yore

Elizabeth Yore has been published at The Remnant, The Red Pope, showing the irrefutable evidence that Bergoglio is a communist and conspired with the corrupt Obama regime on Cuba and diplomatic relations. She exposes the truth that many of us knew, the sodomite sexual predator, Mr. Theodore McCarrick conspired with Bergoglio to destroy the true Catholic Church in China in a deal with the communist party there.

Petitions will not stop this communist Christ-hating thug, Jorge Mario Bergoglio. Nor will the cowardly cardinals and bishops who owe their comfort to him.

Hirelings, all of them.

"May there days be shortened and another his bishopric take!"

 https://remnantnewspaper.com/web/index.php/fetzen-fliegen/item/4882-the-red-pope

Francis says; "If you dress up for God, you're a Peacock!"

Pope Bergoglio says that if you dress in your "Sunday best" you're a peacock.

What he doesn't get, or does but doesn't care about, is that the "peacocks" to him he refers worked hard all week and had one day to dress up and they did if for God. My father stood on his feet from Tuesday to Saturday cutting hair and my mother the nurse on hard terrazzo floors in leather shoes breaking her back turning over her patients. But on Sunday, they dressed for Mass and they were more Catholic than the Pope.

But Bergoglio would know little about the real humble people.

Has God unleashed his wrath on Pope Francis and the Church?

Has God unleashed his wrath on Pope Francis and the Church? We know in the Old Testament that when Israel sinned, God acted and it was not necessarily with mercy.

Mercy is what we've heard for seven years now this March. How coincidental. We've seen Church doctrine overturned and sodomites come out of hiding executing their heinous control over the Church. The Bishop of Rome who should be affirming all in the Faith has instead undermined. He grovels, literally, on the floor to kiss the feet of tribal leaders and heads of state and refused to genuflect to the Lord that made Heaven and Earth at the Mass or at Adoration. I could go on.

When he was elected, Pope Bergoglio shunned the simple and humble and cost-free papal apartment in itself, large because it is multi-functional, but not overly luxurious, instead staying in the Hotel Santa Marta. He said it was because he needed to be around people and did not want to be isolated. 

Yet, that room could he is in required the whole floor to be vacated and the revenue lost. He said it was out of humility that he would shun the luxurious 500 year old palace for the simple hotel room. 

He said that for psychological reasons he did not want to be so isolated from people in the palace and to eat his meals in public. We can speculate on whether these were his real reasons, of course, charity demands we believe him. 

How ironic then that all that he wanted has now been taken from him. 

From Marco Tosatti via Church Militant:


The fact that the pope has decided to eat alone, in his own room, indicates that he is very worried. We recall how Pope Bergoglio decided, when he was elected, not to occupy the papal apartment in the Vatican Palace as his predecessors had done, but to live at Santa Marta. He took his meals in the common dining room, although for some years a row of potted plants gave him a small amount of privacy. But the fact that he has now renounced community life is a sign that he is both worried and prudent.

Tosatti also describes how the China-Wuhan Virus is spreading behind Vatican walls.

Has God unleashed his wrath on Pope Francis and the Church?

And yet, Pope Francis has said that it is nature's "revenge," "tantrum" and "cry." 

Well, I guess Pack-A-Mama's a bitch, eh?

That'll teach you to worship pagan idols and then lie and spin that it is an image of the non-existent Our Lady of the "Amazon." 

And what does he do? Join in an "Our Father." 

Holy Father, try "sackcloth and ashes" for your pagan idolatry, doctrinal heresy and cover up of sexual filth and perversion, sodomite clerics and financial corruption and malfeasance.

The Church is being scourged by God. It is happening in our site. But after Good Friday, comes Easter and she will shine brighter than ever,

https://www.romancatholicman.com/father-joseph-ratzingers-1969-prediction-church-will-look-like-2000/

Father Joseph Ratzinger’s 1969 Prediction: What the Church Will Look Like in 2000

In a 1969 German radio broadcast, Father Joseph Ratzinger offered his thoughtfully considered answer to the question, “What will become of the Church in the future?” Here are his concluding remarks,

“The future of the Church can and will issue from those whose roots are deep and who live from the pure fullness of their faith. It will not issue from those who accommodate themselves merely to the passing moment or from those who merely criticize others and assume that they themselves are infallible measuring rods; nor will it issue from those who take the easier road, who sidestep the passion of faith, declaring false and obsolete, tyrannous and legalistic, all that makes demands upon men, that hurts them and compels them to sacrifice themselves. To put this more positively: The future of the Church, once again as always, will be reshaped by saints, by men, that is, whose minds probe deeper than the slogans of the day, who see more than others see, because their lives embrace a wider reality.

Unselfishness, which makes men free, is attained only through the patience of small daily acts of self-denial. By this daily passion, which alone reveals to a man in how many ways he is enslaved by his own ego, by this daily passion and by it alone, a man’s eyes are slowly opened. He sees only to the extent that he has lived and suffered. If today we are scarcely able any longer to become aware of God, that is because we find it so easy to evade ourselves, to flee from the depths of our being by means of the narcotic of some pleasure or other. Thus our own interior depths remain closed to us. If it is true that a man can see only with his heart, then how blind we are!

How does all this affect the problem we are examining? It means that the big talk of those who prophesy a Church without God and without faith is all empty chatter. We have no need of a Church that celebrates the cult of action in political prayers. It is utterly superfluous. Therefore, it will destroy itself. What will remain is the Church of Jesus Christ, the Church that believes in the God who has become man and promises us life beyond death. The kind of priest who is no more than a social worker can be replaced by the psychotherapist and other specialists; but the priest who is no specialist, who does not stand on the [sidelines], watching the game, giving official advice, but in the name of God places himself at the disposal of man, who is beside them in their sorrows, in their joys, in their hope and in their fear, such a priest will certainly be needed in the future.

Let us go a step farther. From the crisis of today the Church of tomorrow will emerge — a Church that has lost much. She will become small and will have to start afresh more or less from the beginning. She will no longer be able to inhabit many of the edifices she built in prosperity. As the number of her adherents diminishes, so it will lose many of her social privileges. In contrast to an earlier age, it will be seen much more as a voluntary society, entered only by free decision. As a small society, it will make much bigger demands on the initiative of her individual members. Undoubtedly it will discover new forms of ministry and will ordain to the priesthood approved Christians who pursue some profession. In many smaller congregations or in self-contained social groups, pastoral care will normally be provided in this fashion. Along-side this, the full-time ministry of the priesthood will be indispensable as formerly. But in all of the changes at which one might guess, the Church will find her essence afresh and with full conviction in that which was always at her center: faith in the triune God, in Jesus Christ, the Son of God made man, in the presence of the Spirit until the end of the world. In faith and prayer she will again recognize the sacraments as the worship of God and not as a subject for liturgical scholarship.

The Church will be a more spiritual Church, not presuming upon a political mandate, flirting as little with the Left as with the Right. It will be hard going for the Church, for the process of crystallization and clarification will cost her much valuable energy. It will make her poor and cause her to become the Church of the meek. The process will be all the more arduous, for sectarian narrow-mindedness as well as pompous self-will will have to be shed. One may predict that all of this will take time. The process will be long and wearisome as was the road from the false progressivism on the eve of the French Revolution — when a bishop might be thought smart if he made fun of dogmas and even insinuated that the existence of God was by no means certain — to the renewal of the nineteenth century. But when the trial of this sifting is past, a great power will flow from a more spiritualized and simplified Church. Men in a totally planned world will find themselves unspeakably lonely. If they have completely lost sight of God, they will feel the whole horror of their poverty. Then they will discover the little flock of believers as something wholly new. They will discover it as a hope that is meant for them, an answer for which they have always been searching in secret.

And so it seems certain to me that the Church is facing very hard times. The real crisis has scarcely begun. We will have to count on terrific upheavals. But I am equally certain about what will remain at the end: not the Church of the political cult, which is dead already, but the Church of faith. It may well no longer be the dominant social power to the extent that she was until recently; but it will enjoy a fresh blossoming and be seen as man’s home, where he will find life and hope beyond death.

The Catholic Church will survive in spite of men and women, not necessarily because of them. And yet, we still have our part to do. We must pray for and cultivate unselfishness, self-denial, faithfulness, Sacramental devotion and a life centered on Christ.

In 2009 Ignatius Press released Father Joseph Ratzinger’s speech “What Will the Church Look Like in 2000” in full, in a book entitled Faith and the Future.

Confirmation that McCarrick was under discipline, he ignored it, Wuerl lied, and Bergoglio says he knew nothing!

The latest on the filthy sodomite predator pervert Theodore McCarrick, still living comfortably on Catholic money reveals that he was disciplined, disobeyed, Wuerl knew and lied, and Bergoglio denies any knowledge and Viganò was right all along.

Given the hand that that filthy pervert had in the election of Bergoglio we are expected to believe his denial of any knowledge?

Poppycock.

https://cruxnow.com/church-in-the-usa/2019/05/28/mccarrick-correspondence-confirms-restrictions-speaks-to-wuerl-and-china/

AND!

A former aide to Mr. McCarrick, Msgr .Anthony Figueirdo, has published a report verifiying the information.

‘Follow the Path of Truth Wherever it May Lead’

By Monsignor Anthony J. Figueiredo

May 28, 2019

The former Cardinal Theodore E. McCarrick ordained me to the priesthood 25 years ago today.  I served as his personal secretary in the Archdiocese of Newark (September 1994 – June 1995) and also assisted him in a secretarial capacity during his many visits to Rome in my 19 years of ministry there.After long consideration, I have made the decision to place in the public domain some of the correspondence and other information related to McCarrick that I possess in my many years of service to him. I have spent time in prayer and discernment about the moral basis for revealing these. My decision follows attempts since September 2018 to share and discuss these with the Holy See and other Church leaders.

Realizing full well that the debate about McCarrick has become highly politicized, I wish only to present facts that will help the Church to know the truth. From the outset of this report, I pledge my unswerving affection, loyalty and support for Pope Francis and his Magisterium in his tireless ministry as the Successor of Peter, as I manifested also to Pope Benedict XVI, grateful for their paternal solicitude and efforts to address the scourge of abuse. Indeed, my actions in releasing this report at this time are encouraged by the Holy Father’s motu proprio “Vos Estis Lux Mundi” (“You are the light of the world. A city set on a hill cannot be hidden.” Mt 5:14), based on the overriding principle that it is imperative to place in the public domain, at the right time and prudently, information that has yet to come to light and impacts directly on allegations of criminal activity, the restrictions imposed on my now laicized former Archbishop, and who knew what and when.

It is my firm hope that this information will help the Church as she further endeavors to create a culture of transparency. This report, which may form the first of others, is a contribution to the wish of Pope Francis and the Holy See “to follow the path of truth wherever it may lead” in terms of the ongoing McCarrick investigation (Pope Francis, Philadelphia, USA, September 27, 2015;  Press Statement of the Holy See, October 6, 2018). It aims to help the US Bishops in their promise last August to “pursue the many questions surrounding Archbishop McCarrick’s conduct … we are determined to find the truth in this matter” (Statement of Cardinal Daniel DiNardo, President, USCCB, August 1, 2018). What Archbishop Wilton Gregory expressed for his local Church, upon his appointment to the Archdiocese of Washington, I wish to do for the Universal Church: “The only way that I can serve this Archdiocese is by telling the truth” (Press Conference, April 4, 2019).

Read the rest at:

http://thefigueiredoreport.com/

Argentine accuser of Pope Francis' friend, Gustavo Vera, found dead!

what is going on in ...

BUENOS AIRES, February 23, 2019 (LifeSiteNews) -- Natacha Jaitt, an Argentine media celebrity who had accused Gustavo Vera, a friend of Pope Francis, of sex crimes, was found dead during the pre-dawn hours on Saturday at a resort near Buenos Aires. Jaitt tweeted in October that Vera was Pope Francis’ “accomplice.” She wrote: “Justo Gustavo Vera, is a pimp, sex-trafficker, and accomplice of the Pope and, as I predicted, was tried for misappropriation of funds at Alameda and other illegal acts. God will do what is just, someday. Amen.” 

https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/argentine-prostitute-who-accused-pope-of-complicity-in-child-sex-traffickin

Mr. McCarrick is defrocked and Bergoglio laughs

As expected, Theodore Edgar McCarrick, a pervert, a rapist, a homosexual - a sodomite, has been reduced to the lay state and is known as "Mister" if he even deserves that. It is a move by Bergoglio on the eve of the already discredited Vatican conference to take place on abuse, a conference which will not deal with the sodomites in the priesthood, that is too little, too late.

The text from the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith is as follows:

On 11 January 2019, the Congresso of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, at the conclusion of a penal process, issued a decree finding Theodore Edgar McCarrick, archbishop emeritus of Washington, D.C., guilty of the following delicts while a cleric: solicitation in the Sacrament of Confession, and sins against the Sixth Commandment with minors and with adults, with the aggravating factor of the abuse of power. The Congresso imposed on him the penalty of dismissal from the clerical state. On 13 February 2019, the Ordinary Session (Feria IV) of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith considered the recourse he presented against this decision. Having examined the arguments in the recourse, the Ordinary Session confirmed the decree of the Congresso. This decision was notified to Theodore McCarrick on 15 February 2019. The Holy Father has recognized the definitive nature of this decision made in accord with law, rendering it a res iudicata (i.e., admitting of no further recourse).

Wise readers will know that this means little. Until every bishop and cardinal who knew and covered up is held accountable it remains too little, too late. Until there are actual criminal charges and financial consequences, it remains a joke.

A joke.

And this Peronist sits on the Seat of Peter laughing at you.

As for the conference, whilst the problem is manifested most violently in the abuse of children and youths, the fundamental problem is sodomites in the Priesthood and Episcopacy, Cardinaliate and maybe even the papacy itself. Every sodomite priest must be outed and removed from the clerical state. What if they are chaste? It does not matter, they are compromised if it is known that they have "same-sex attraction." They can be blackmailed, manipulated. They must be removed. If that means we lose 30% or 50% or more of our priests, then so be it. Drive further to Mass.

Don't think for a minute that this Argentinian Marxist thug named Jorge Mario Bergoglio takes this matter seriously. He does not, he is laughing at you. Just like these three homosexualist heresiarchs one of which this Bergoglio has now appointed as Camarlengo, one who actually lived with McCarrick and the others who were all his Protégés.

Let them laugh now. 

They won't be laughing forever.

Bishop Gracida on who is Pope

"ONLY GOD KNOWS WHO IS REALLY THE POPE, BENEDICT OR FRANCIS !!!!! IF I HAD TO GUESS I WOULD SAY THAT BENEDICT IS STILL THE POPE AND THAT FRANCIS IS AN ANTI-POPE, BUT THAT IS JUST MY INTUITION, NOT MY CANONICAL/THEOLOGICAL OPINION"

At his blog, he features the entire LifeSiteNews article summarising the arguments.

What is my opinion?

Bergoglio is Pope because Canon Law was, as far as we can know, followed. The priests of the diocese of Rome, the Cardinals and people of God accept and recognise him as Pope, ergo, he is Pope. 

There are serious questions arising from the resignation of Joseph Ratzinger. I believe he was pushed and that he was not forthcoming about this. I find the Barnhardt and VeriCatholici arguments compelling. Pope Benedict XVI by various actions has given us sufficient reason to doubt the validity.

As one who first featured the video of Mr. McCarrick's talk at Villanova and his own lobbying of the Cardinals after the instruction to do so by a "powerful" Roman, there is reason to believe the election was manipulated, this; and the three ballot day. If this is true, then it could have rendered the Conclave, invalid.

My own personal experience upon the election of Bergoglio, the urge to vomit and chills and yet, I had never heard of Jorge Mario Bergoglio, was a sign to me that something was terribly wrong.

Bergoglio is the Pope according to what we know and can know based upon what we see. 

Does he have have, did he ever have the grace of office?  If he had it, has he lost it by his obvious apostasy and heresy? These are legitimate questions and the people who ask them should not be mocked.

May God save his people.

Is Bergoglio covering up the McCarrick case by blaming the victim? Is this why Greg Burke and Paloma Garcia Ovejero resigned?

Church Militant is reporting that officials in the Vatican are covering up the sodomite pervert McCarrick crimes and that the main victim is not credible and even sought out sex with McCarrick in St. Patrick's Cathedral.

https://www.churchmilitant.com/news/article/breaking-news-vatican-attempts-mccarrick-cover-up

Did Greg Burke and Paloma Garcia Ovejero have knowledge of this? Is this why they resigned?

Bergoglio is now blaming the American bishops for the sexual scandals. Americans have  their fair share of miscreants and perverts in the priesthood and episcopacy but homosexual filth invades everywhere, the infestation is dominant in the Vatican and this Bergoglio has protected them from the first day of his so-called, papacy. That is well known.

The Church and the Bishop of Rome now seem to be in the total clutches of Satan.

May the Lord of heaven and earth send His angels to protect the faith.

Who was Uncle Teddy McCarrick's friend and what was the role of Freemasonry in the election of Jorge Bergoglio?

Originally published on April 28, 2016, it is good to see that this information has finally come to light by more prominent writers. 

Given the explosive Testimony of Archbishop Carlo Maria Viganò, this self-incrimination by McCarrick reveals as much about Pope Francis and what was owe"dd to McCarrick for "talking him up."

According to Viganò, without McCarrick, there would be no Bishop McElroy, or no Cardinals Tobin, Farrell or Cupich.

Theodore Cardinal McCarrick, former Archbishop of Washington during a talk at Villanova University gave the following recollection of a conversation with an "influential" Roman during the period before the Conclave which elected Jorge Bergoglio as Bishop of Rome.

18:20 Just before we went into the general conversations when everybody can talk, a very interesting and influential Italian gentleman came to ask if he could come and see me, so I said “sure.”

He came to see me at the Seminary, at the American College where I was staying; and we sat down. He is a very brilliant man, a very influential man in Rome and we talked about a number of things. He had a favour to ask me when I get back to the United States, but then he asked,

“What about Bergoglio?”

I was surprised at the question, I said, “what about him.”

He said, “Does he have a chance?”

I said, “I don’t think so, because no one has mentioned his name, he hasn’t been in anybody’s mind, I don’t think it’s on anybody’s mind to vote for him.”

He said, “He could do it you know.”

I said, “What could he do?”

He said, “He could reform the Church, if we gave him five years, he could put us back on target. “

“Well, he’s 76.”

“Yeah, in five years, if he had five years. The Lord working through Bergoglio in five years could make the Church over again.”

I said, “That’s an interesting thing.”

“I know you’re his friend.”

“Well, I hope I’m his friend.”

He said, “Talk him up.”

That was the first that I heard from people that Bergoglio would be a possibility in this election.

(...)

I hope that the new, that the one who is elected Pope, will be someone who, if he is not himself a Latin American, would at least have a very strong interest in Latin America”. “Was that part of it? Who knows?  What is it my friend said? “Push Bergoglio”?  Did he say it to a lot of people? I don’t know.”

Consider this then.

Gustavo Raffi, Grand Master of the Grand Orient of Italy

"With the election of Pope Francis nothing will ever be the same again. With Pope Francis, nothing will be more as it was before. It is a clear choice of fraternity for a Church of dialogue, which is not contaminated by the logic and temptations of temporal power"

“A man of the poor far away from the Curia. Fraternity and the desire to dialogue were his first concrete words. Perhaps nothing in the Church will be as it was before. Our hope is that the pontificate of Francis, the Pope who 'comes from the end of the world' can mark the return to the Church-Word instead of the Church-Institution, promoting an open dialogue with the contemporary world, with believers and non-believers, following the springtime of Vatican II."

"The Jesuit who is close to the least ones of history," Raffi continues, "has the great opportunity to show the world the face of a Church that must recover the announcement of a new humanity, not the weight of an institution that closes itself off in defense of its own privileges. Bergoglio knows real life and will remember the lesson of one of his favorite theologians, Romano Guardini, for whom the truth of love cannot be stopped.

"The simple cross he wore on his white cassock," concludes the Grand Master of Palazzo Giustiniani, "lets us hope that a Church of the people will re-discover its capacity to dialogue with all men of good will and with Freemasonry, which, as the experience of Latin America teaches us, works for the good and progress of humanity, as shown by Bolivar, Allende and José Martí, to name only a few. This is the 'white smoke' that we expect from the Church of our times."  

Pope Francis on "dialogue"

"Dialogue, dialogue, dialogue!" This, he said, is the only way for individuals, families and societies to grow. He said fraternal relations between people and cooperation in building a more just society are not some vague utopia but the fruit of a concerted effort on the part of all, in service of the common good.

http://www.news.va/en/news/pope-francis-my-advice-is-always-dialogue-dialogue

Pope to U.S. bishops: be shepherds in unity and dialogue

http://en.radiovaticana.va/news/2015/09/23/pope_to_us_bishops_be_shepherds_in_unity_and_dialogue/1174163

Pope at Mass: Those who do not dialogue disobey God

http://en.radiovaticana.va/news/2015/04/16/pope_at_mass_those_who_do_not_dialogue_disobey_god/1137174

Pope's general prayer intention for November is for dialogue

http://en.radiovaticana.va/news/2015/10/31/popes_general_prayer_intention_for_november_is_for_dialogue/1183565

Pope  Francis calls for solidarity and dialogue

http://americamagazine.org/issue/pope-francis-calls-solidarity-and-dialogue

Pope Francis Congressional Address: A Dialogue with Four Faces of America (13 times)

https://www.ncregister.com/daily-news/pope-francis-address-to-us-congress/

Pope Francis to Japanese students: 'Dialogue is what brings peace'

http://ncronline.org/news/vatican/pope-francis-japanese-students-dialogue-what-brings-peace

The whole video can be seen here.