Father Edward J. Curtis, the Chancellor for the Archdiocese of Toronto has issued a memorandum to clergy, parishes and staff of the Archdiocese regarding numerous requests for letters of exemption to the unconstitutional mandates by government and business on the matter of the injection against SARS-CoV-2 and its variants. An injection that doesn't really work. As my own doctor said, "You can still get Covid and you can still pass it on, you just might not die from Covid."
The memorandum refers to statements from both Cardinal Collins and Pope Francis on the matter as acts of love and charity. Further, he states that the CDF has already determined that the "vaccines" are morally licit and can be used in good conscience. He continues that priests should not issue such letters of exemption.
While he mentions the CDF's general statement, he neglects some important points. Shall we look at the whole of paragraph number 5?
5. At the same time, practical reason makes evident that vaccination is not, as a rule, a moral obligation and that, therefore, it must be voluntary. In any case, from the ethical point of view, the morality of vaccination depends not only on the duty to protect one's own health but also on the duty to pursue the common good. In the absence of other means to stop or even prevent the epidemic, the common good may recommend vaccination, especially to protect the weakest and most exposed. Those who, however, for reasons of conscience, refuse vaccines produced with cell lines from aborted fetuses, must do their utmost to avoid, by other prophylactic means and appropriate behaviour, becoming vehicles for the transmission of the infectious agent. In particular, they must avoid any risk to the health of those who cannot be vaccinated for medical or other reasons, and who are the most vulnerable.
The common good dictates that I do everything reasonable to prevent the transmission of any virus if I were to have one. It does not demand that I take an experimental injection that is more and more revealed as severely harmful to many and which for some, is of moral concern, notwithstanding the issue of "remote cooperation."
On the matter of a religious exemption. Father Curtis has failed in his understanding of Canadian law both in the Constitution and Human Rights legislation and common law. What he should have said is this:
"No Canadian Catholic, nor any citizen, needs any letter for a "religious exemption." One simply asserts religious and conscientious exemption with no explanation necessary!"
After all, if I can put on a tutu and fairy dust and identify as Shirley Temple and the government and you cannot deny my identity then I can surely assert my rights in this matter.
Think, people!
The links below will be helpful to anyone in Canada concerned about these rabid diktats. Note, the first from lawyer Rocco Galati, that generally, the Constitution and its Charter of Rights related to government and the people, not private business. However, courts have ruled that private business must be consistent.
Do not resign your position. Assert and resist. Then sue!
Resist the tyrannical politicians and the religious "leaders" who do their bidding.
The links below will be helpful.
https://www.constitutionalrightscentre.ca/employee-rights-the-covid-19-vaccine/
https://stlawyers.ca/blog-news/covid-19-vaccines-what-can-an-employer-demand-in-canada/
https://everydayforlifecanada.blogspot.com/2021/08/mandatory-vaccines-what-are-your-rights.html
