Wednesday, 7 October 2015

Father Thomas J. Rosica, CSB has become "THE STORY" to the disgrace of Federico Lombardi and Pope Francis himself!

Father Thomas J. Rosica, the Vatican's English-language spokesman for the Synod, has committed the greatest error of any media spokesman or communications expert -- becoming the actual story.

Consider this screenshot from PewSitter.Com taken at 11:00PM, EDT on October 7.

Read those headlines - four specific articles about Father Thomas Rosica and what he has said and not said. One, is a republishing by LifeSiteNews of his interview with the heretic, defrocked priest, Vatican II expert and same-sex so-called marriage supporter Gregory Baum. Father Rosica has become the story. OnePeterFive writes, "Father Rosica's bias: Are we getting the full story?" Even Edward Pentin asks the question and gives the answers.

There is even more when one searches for what others have written on blogs and other social media. 

The public media has reported on the great discussions on sodomy and how the language for homosexuals must change in the Church. Rosica is quoted extensively. Yet, we have the proof, as I was tipped off early this morning and confirmed a few hours later by Archbishop Charles Chaput, that the number of points about homosexuality that came up at the Synod was "one or two." Yet, according to the global media, based upon comments in Zenit by Father Thomas Rosica, it was the preeminent issue.

Father Federico Lombardi, S.J. as Director of the Holy See Press Office and Jorge Bergoglio, the Pope have a responsibility to the English speaking world to ensure that we have the truth of what is discussed and what our bishops are saying.

Have you need for more proof that we are not getting the full story?

Barona, at Toronto Catholic Witness reports on Cardinal Jose Luiz Lacunza Maestojuan of Panama, being "rebuked" by the Greek-Melkite Patriarch of Antioch, His Beatitude Gregory III Laham. The Cardinal suggested that the Law of Christ be overturned for that of Moses. Yes, you read that correctly. How do we know this? Because Barona scoured the Polish blog of Archbishop Stanislaw Gadecki. Yet, Father Rosica and Federico Lombardi did not feel that this example of "bishop against bishop and cardinal against cardinal" to quote Our Lady of Akita, should be known by you or me.

Do you need more proof? No one less than Archbishop Charles Chaput himself commenting that he can't read the official Italian texts and the English texts do not have accurate translations. The days are gone when Latin was the universal language to prevent this problem. All these prelates praising St. John XXIII and ignored his work on Latin in the seminaries. Fools.

Not acceptable!

A Synod, by its nature, is open and votes. The Pope has forbidden this. Adding to this the obfuscation of communication to the largest language group in the Catholic world is deplorable, scandalous and despicable that we, the Catholic faithful, should be kept in ignorance as to what is really being said.

The Synod is quickly becoming a sham and the proof is there for all to see and the Pope and Lombardi are responsible for it because they have set this up and allowed this scandalous charade.

Stating that the Holy Spirit is guiding it is an insult to Almighty God.

We must have full disclosure on what is being said without the filter of any agenda.

Viva Cristo Rey!


Maudie N Mandeville said...

I just saw a video of Fr. Rosica on CM and heard his voice for the first time. I didn't realize he was so gay.

john said...

Pope Marx and his disgraceful pervert troupes have no shame.

Anonymous said...

The progressive clergy are causing great scandal in the Church.
Why has Pope Francis allowed this situation to occur by:
* publicly praising Kasper's heterodox proposal
* radically changing the format of the Synod from previous years, including language, thereby causing great confusion, lack of transparency, and discussing issues that have already been closed. By doing the latter, he has opened Pandora's box and the genie will not go back, because the progressives (who shouldn't even have been present) will bulldoze their way through.
Fr. Rosica, by his statements, is an example of a Synod gone very wrong. The pope sat and watched all this confusion unfold without even trying to correct it. In fact he planned it by appointing several cardinals who definitely did not meet the criteria of "Catholic" because of their blatant personal pro homosexual agenda, and their support of Communion for the divorced and remarried Catholics, the pope once again orchestrated mass confusion in a process that should have been very stringent because of the nature of the controversial topics that were deliberately put on the agenda.

To me, all of this smacks of intrigue, deception, tampering with the Word of God, and the devil.
To think that people like Kasper, Baldisseri, Dew, Schonburn, Durocher, Rosica and others were entrusted to be shepherds of the Church, is shocking and scandalous. All of these people have been aggressively opposed to Catholic doctrine and should be confronted with their deception. The problem is will the pope do the disciplining? I fear not.

All of the above must have been very difficult for the faithful cardinals to deal with. To see the teaching of Jesus Christ trampled underfoot must be very painful !

Anonymous said...

The present pope is very wise. He is flushing out all the evil spirits. Purging to scheduled soon.

Sean L. Tobin said...

Well! I, personally, think the Holy Father is not following his own agenda but the agenda of those who were part of the Group of Cardinals and others who plotted the election of Cardinal Bergoglio to become Pope Francis.

The authorized biography of Cardinal Godfried Danneels ()released in 2015) was even more of a bombshell than expected. Not only do the two authors, Jürgen Mettepenningen and Karim Schelkens, reveal that the Cardinal was a regular member of a secret pressure group of Churchmen that met in the Swiss town of Sankt-Gallen, but the Cardinal himself has publicly and good-humoredly admitted the fact.

Danneels even said that what was officially but discreetly labeled “the Sankt-Gallen group” had its self-imposed aim as being to counter the growing influence of Cardinal Ratzinger under the pontificate of Saint John Paul II, serving as a sort of outlet where handpicked cardinals and bishops could express their impatience at the traditional mindset of the Pope and his closest counsellor.