“A time is coming when men will go mad, and when they see someone who is not mad, they will attack him, saying, 'You are mad; you are not like us.” ― St. Antony the Great
Let this be of great joy to you that the truth is coming out. The filthy, vile and evil perverts and their machinations to elect the man who would change the Church forever.
Each one of these malefactors, particularly the Evil Clown, as Mundabor refers to him, must be mocked and discredited. They must be challenged to their filthy faces and outed by all of us. We must never abandon our Mother, we must beat these filthy scum out of Her since their goal is to destroy Her.
On the eve of the 2013 conclave, Cardinal Óscar Rodríguez Maradiaga busily phoned cardinal voters from the Honduran embassy in Rome. He was one of the conclave’s key kingmakers—and he was vigorously promoting then-Cardinal Bergoglio for pope.
That same day, Maradiaga attended a private meeting of Bergoglio supporters, including key revolutionaries from the St. Gallen mafia. Together, they tallied at least twenty-five votes for Bergoglio—who later opened, notably, with twenty-six. On the conclave’s second day, Maradiaga was back at work, shooting down a rival group’s lunchtime rumor that Bergoglio had only one lung. Four days later, the newly elected Pope Francis asked Maradiaga to head his powerful new Council of Cardinals.
We are familiar with what Bergoglio did in Abu Dhabi signing the document with the Imam from Egypt. He stated that God willed the diversity of religions. At the time, we knew that nuance could be used to legitimise Bergoglio's blasphemy by saying it was God's "permissive" will. But if Bergoglio meant it to be interpreted that way, he would have had it written that way. It is the "Pope's" job to be clear, to be concise and to speak the truth. On a recent "ad limina" visit, Bishop Athanasius Schneider of Kazakhstan questioned Bergoglio and he allegedly received permission from Bergoglio to issue a statement that he, Bergoglio, really meant, God's "permissive" will. What a wiley Modernist. What a manipulative con man is this Bergoglio. Oh, Bishop Schneider, how you have been used. It is a shame to see it occur to you in real time.
First, it was the Franciscan Friars of the Immaculate and then, the Sisters who were told, "they pray too much." Not so many months ago, the Mariaweld Trappist Monastery was closed down. Their commonality? A new and growing traditional Catholicism.
The Fraternity of the Holy Apostles was established by the former Archbishop of Brussels, André Léonard. Not long after his retirement and his replacement by his replacement De Kesel, a radical protegé of disgraced pervert protecting and Bergoglian promoter Godfried Danneels, the Fraternity was dissolved.
A group of lay people sought to appeal the decision to the Apostolic Signatura, the highest court in the Church. Before that appeal could be heard, it was summarily ended. The news is now out that Francis Bergoglio has unilaterally used his full, complete and universal jurisdiction to permanently dissolve the Fraternity.
Let this serve as a warning to the SSPX and FSSP.
More importantly, let this serve as a warning to Bergoglio.
Originally published September 23, 2016.
Updated: October 4, 2016
In his post today, Sandro Magister picks up
again on the points made at the link below. After further analysis of
Bergoglio's comment in the letter to the Bishop in Buenos Aires and the actions of his Roman
Vicar, there is no other conclusion to make.
Jorge Bergoglio, the Bishop of Rome has
sanctioned Holy Communion for those in adultery and a previous valid marriage
that cannot be granted a Decree of Nullity.
It is a crime against Our Lord Jesus Christ and
His Church such as never before in all of history. Not even popes who
themselves were criminals, fornicators, adulterers, sodomites or murderers
taught such a thing - that the Holy Eucharist could openly permitted to be
defiled.
On his Seventh Heaven Blog, Sandro Magister asks if Agostino Vallini, the Cardinal Vicar of Rome will now receive a commendation from Pope Francis. Perhaps we should call it the Bergoglio Award for Faith Corruption. The Vicar, who represents the Pope in the day to day business of the Diocese of Rome, has issued a document on Amoris Laetitia. It occurred on September 19 at the Lateran Basilica to the Pastoral Conference of the Diocese of Rome and is titled, "The Joy of love: the path of the families of Rome."
"It is important to establish with all these people and
couples a 'good pastoral relationship'. That is, we must welcome them with
warmth, invite them to open themselves to participate in some way in the
Church's life, to groups of families, to perform some service, eg. charitable
or liturgical (choir prayer of the faithful, offertory procession). to develop
these processes is extremely valuable active presence of pairs of pastoral
workers and also the profit you a lot of the community climate. these people -
the Pope says - "should not feel excommunicated, but they can live and
grow as living members of the Church "(AL, 299).
"It's not necessarily get to the sacraments, but to
direct them to live forms of integration in ecclesial life. But when the
concrete circumstances of a couple make it feasible, ie when their faith
journey has been long, sincere and progressive , proposes to live in
continence, then if this choice is difficult to practice for the stability of
the couple, 'Amoris laetitia' does not exclude the possibility of access to
penance and the Eucharist. this means some opening, as in the case in which
there is a moral certainty that the first marriage was null and void but no
evidence to prove it in court; but rather when, for example, was paraded their
condition as if it were part of the Christian ideal, and so on.
"How are we to understand this opening? Certainly not
in the sense of non-discriminatory access to the sacraments, as occasionally
happens, but of a discernment that distinguishes appropriately case by case.
Who can decide? The wording of the text and the 'mens' of its Author not I
think there is no other solution than that of. in fact, the internal forum
internal forum is the way conducive to open our hearts to the most intimate confidences,
and if it has been established over time a relationship of trust with a
confessor or a spiritual guide, you can start and develop with him a long
journey of conversion, patient, made of small steps and progressive
inspections.
"So, it cannot be other that the confessor, at some
point, in his conscience, after much reflection and prayer, are to shoulder the
responsibility before God and the penitent and to request that access to the
sacraments takes place in a confidential manner. in these cases do not end the
process of discernment (AL, 303: 'dynamic discernment') in order to achieve
further steps towards the full Christian ideal. "
"Access to the sacraments in a confidential manner." Why? Because they know that it is wrong and they can't bring their error into the light, lest it cause scandal for its very error. First Buenos Aires where Bergoglio was Bishop, now Rome, where he is Bishop. Is there any more denying what the Pope thinks? How much more until the neo-Caths try to twist this pretzel logic that the Pope doesn't really mean what he means?
The Vicar has chosen to follow the path of the Buenos Aires episcopate to whom Bergoglio wrote, "there is no other interpretation." One now can wonder, what will Bergoglio say or do about Canada's Bishops in Alberta and the Northwest Territories who upheld the teaching of "living as brother and sister?" These bishops quoted directly from Familiaris Consortio, so conveniently abridged by Bergoglio and the putrid writers of Amoris Laetitia. The Pope has already watered down the annulment process and he has questioned the sacramental validity of most Catholic marriages. Amoris Laetitita goes the rest of the way, to allow that who cannot obtain an legitimate, legal and proper Decree of Nullity to return to the Sacraments after they are "remarried" civilly and living in adultery. The fundamental question that I have had since the beginning is simple and comes down to one word. Why? Is it really about money? Are there really that many people in such situation in our parishes demanding to return to the sacraments on threat of withholding their five shekels a week? (Catholics want married priests? They can't afford married priests but that's for the next synod but it makes my point on the money). Germany is only one place, the laws there are not everywhere, which of course explains Bergoglio's desire to decentralise the Church. Yet, there seems to me that there has go to be something more. They can only hate the faith. They can only hate Our Lord Jesus Christ and His true presence in the Church through the Blessed Sacrament. There can be no other explanation.They no longer believe. If they ever had the faith, they have long since lost it, Of that, I accuse Bergoglio, a man who still won't genuflect at the altar to the Salvation of the World, but who grovels on the floor to wash the feet of those who have come to destroy Europe. Why does he refuse to genuflect? It is truly from Satan.
So, when all hell breaks loose in October, the question to ask is "Where will Peter be?" The next question is "Where will that leave us?" I've asked it for weeks now. Maybe we already know.
Communion for the Remarried. Francis Has a Yes "In Pectore"
The pope has given the go-ahead for discussion. He doesn't say whether he is on the side of those in favor or those against, but he appears to be much closer to the former than to the latter. An Australian theologian explains why
by Sandro Magister
ROME, September 8, 2014 – The latest to call for a radical change in the Church's practice and doctrine on marriage is the Belgian bishop of Antwerp, Johan Jozef Bonny.
He did so in early September with a thirty-page memorandum in multiple languages, which he also sent to Pope Francis.
Because the presumed support of Jorge Mario Bergoglio is inevitably part of the arguments of the cardinals, bishops, and theologians who are calling for the change, which would mean granting Eucharistic communion to the divorced and remarried: a key argument of the synod of bishops on the family set to have its first session in Rome this October.
Pope Francis has never said explicitly what his position is in the dispute - to which he intentionally gave free rein - between the proponents and opponents of the change.
When, for example, he defended in strong words the encyclical of Paul VI "Humanae Vitae," he disappointed the innovators, who see that very encyclical as an emblem of the disastrous detachment of the magisterium of the Church from the spirit of the times and the practice of the faithful themselves.
But on the contrary there are are increasingly numerous testimonies on how Bergoglio, as an archbishop, encouraged his priests to give communion to the cohabiting and remarried. He himself, as pope, spoke by telephone last April with a civilly divorced and remarried woman of Buenos Aires and advised her to “go receive communion in another parish if her pastor did not give it to her.” This according to the woman's account, which has not been refuted.
In his homily in the chapel of the Santa Marta residence in the Vatican on Friday morning, the Holy Father reflected on the “newness” of the Gospel – as Good News, and as a bringer of New Things – that frees the person who believes it from slavery to automatic legalism, and opens the heart to the new commandment: love.
The Gospel reading for Friday told the story of the Scribes, who badgered Jesus about the behavior of His disciples, by pointing out that they did not – as the disciples of John the Baptist regularly did – fast and offer prayers. The Lord would not let Himself be provoked, however:
“New wine, new wineskins: the ‘novelty’ of the Gospel – and what does the Gospel bring us? Joy and renewal [It. novità]. These Doctors of the Law were hidebound by their commandments, their rules. St. Paul, speaking of them, tells us that, before faith came – that is, Jesus – we were all kept in custody, as prisoners under the Law. This Law, of this people, was not bad: they were cared for, but they were prisoners, awaiting the advent of faith – that faith, which would be revealed in Christ, itself.” Jesus told the peopel to obey the law but not to follow the example of bad priests!
Pope Francis went on to observe that the People had both the Mosaic Law and a host of customs and smaller legal requirements that the Doctors of the Law had codified. “The Law,” said Pope Francis, “cared for the people, albeit as prisoners are cared-for, and the people were awaiting liberty – that ultimate liberty that God would give to His people through His son.”:
“One of you might say to me: ‘But Father, don’t Christians have laws?’ Yes. Jesus said: ‘I do not come to [abolish the Law], but to fulfil it.’ – and the Beatitudes, for example – the law of love – total love – as Jesus loved us, are the fullness of the Law. Jesus, when he reproves these Doctors of the Law, is taking them to task for not caring for the people with the Law, but making them slaves to so many little laws, so many little things that had to be done.”So many "little laws' like not receiving communion in the case of mortal sin -- divorced and remarried without a declaration of nullity that the first "marriage" did not exist??
Pope Francis went on to explain that all these “little things” that had to be done, had to be done without the freedom that Jesus brings to us with the new law, which He promulgated with His blood. “This,” he said, “is precisely the ransom that the people were awaiting,” while they were, “under the guardianship of the Law, however as prisoners.” The Holy Father also explained that another central lesson of this reading is that the Lord wants us not to be afraid of changing things according to the law of the Gospel: Specifically what do we need to change now, Holy Father? What exactly is it that you are referring to? Never have I heard this passage interpreted in this manner. My understanding is that Our Blessed Lord did not come to "destroy the law but to fulfill it?"
“St. Paul clearly distinguishes the children of the law from the children of faith: new wine in new wineskins – and this is why the Church asks all of us to change certain things.Change what, Holy Father? Please tel us! She asks us to let go of decadent structures – they are useless – and to take up new wineskins, those of the Gospel. One cannot understand the mentality of these Doctors of the Law – for example – these Pharisaical ‘teachers’: the style of the Gospel is a different style, that brings the fullness of the Law – yes- but in a new way: it is the new wine in new wineskins.” "Decadent structures? Like ancient church buildings sold off for bookstores, concert venues, banquet halls and mosques? "Cannot understand these Doctors of Law?" Yes, you are right, We can understand these "Doctors" of some new "Law."
Pope Francis concluded, saying once again that the Gospel is something new, something that brings joy, something that can only be lived fully by a heart that is joyful and renewed, and prayed that God give everyone the grace to keep the new commandment of love, and the joy of that freedom, which the Good News brings.
