“A time is coming when men will go mad, and when they see someone who is not mad, they will attack him, saying, 'You are mad; you are not like us.” ― St. Antony the Great
Ask yourself, did L'Arche know this whilst he was still alive and covered it up?
The report commissioned by L'Arche is clear, Jean Vanier was a pervert protector, a sexual predator, a liar, a heretic and a blasphemer. I am shocked by those on social media defending this predator. I hope Rosica, Salt + Light the CCCB and all the rest of the Canadian Catholic establishment that promoted this "living saint" for a half century are embarrassed. I always suspected this creep. He was just too holy, too perfect. Every Catholic student for decades has had to endure the propaganda in their textbooks, even schools have been named after him.
The quote below is from the report:
Then he began theories, to try to convince me, […]: the lost
woman of Hosea, the sacrifice of Abraham, the glorious mysteries, the
transcendence of the prophetic mission (of his mission) regarding the norms of
morality. He asked me, most insistently, to bind myself to him by an act of
absolute faith in this mission and in himself. I replied that I could only make
an act of faith in God alone, and trust in creatures only insofar as they were
God’s instrument for me […]. He explained to me that it was not for me to make
this discrimination, that he was an instrument of God, and therefore at present
and directly moved by God […].
He said that I lacked strength, that I had to get used to it
gradually, that all this was a great honour to Our Lord and to the Blessed
Virgin, because the sexual organs were the symbol of the greatest love, much
more than the Sacred Heart -. And I said, “but that’s blasphemy! “Then he took
up his theories again, saying that when one arrives at perfect love, everything
is lawful, for there is no more sin.
L'Arche International, founded by Jean Vanier has commissioned its own study on allegations of sexual and spiritual abuse against its lionised founder and the facts lay clear, the man was a stinking fraud.
Vanier was championed by the Catholic elite in Canada as being the perfect person. Schools were named after him, he was held up as an example of all that is good. Like Thomas Merton, he was an abusive pervert.
This abusive scumbag took advantage of women at their worst spiritual time, even comparing himself and declaring that he was one with Our Lord Jesus Christ.
Well Rosica; Is he still? How's life at Southdown?
In a shameful, scandalous, and blatant betrayal of his faith, his country, and his parents, Georges and Pauline Vanier, Jean Vanier, the founder of L'Arche and internationally known Catholic humanitarian has come out in support of euthanasia. Often exaggeratingly and ridiculously called "a living saint," Vanier was interviewed by the CBC on the matter and confirmed his views in writing to LifeSiteNews. Jean Vanier is proof that the Catholic Church in Canada is in rapid collapse. The L'Arche Hymn will never be sung by any choir under my direction or myself again. Jean, feel free to take the needle but remember what will come a moment later. May God's judgement be swift.
Jean Vanier's full statement to LifeSiteNews on assisted
suicide
English translation
I stand by everything that I have said. The main thing is in
any case to support life and to avoid all situations of suicide that originate
in a situation of depression and solitude. No Jean, it is to "avoid all situations of suicide" period!
My sister Therese, who was a palliative care doctor, has
always said that 97 percent of people die fully conscious and without
suffering. For the remaining 3 percent, they worked at finding a way to
administer medication so that all could die without suffering. Nobody needs to suffer unnecessarily. Palliative care is what is needed, as you advocate. Sometimes, those drugs administered to ease pain, may hasten death as a secondary effect.
If the correct sedative or medication has not been found one
cannot oblige someone to live through an unrelenting agony. But one cannot advocate that in the absence of that "sedative or medication" one can administer a drug to "kill" the patient. Why are you not abundantly clear on this?
One must not take part of a series of remarks and take them
out of context. The most important thing is to accompany people with a
competent doctor and above all if possible involved in palliative care. What is the context of your remarks? It seems pretty clear.
Pope Francis continues to tell us that everything cannot be
regulated by a law and there are always exceptions. So, you join the Pope in celebrating ambiguity? "Let your yes be yes and your no be no!"
