More Bergoglian WYD Lisbon sacriledge and scandal - absolutely demonic

 

I use these to store Christmas lights.

Four people take Him seriously.

Clown

Bundle of sticks

https://twitter.com/davidsm74079804/status/1688259930594140161?s=12&t=7PR15aW5AYG9od63qZQBtA

BREAKING: BLASPHEMOUS SACRILIDGE AS NAKED DEVIANT & UKRAINIAN WAR ADVOCATE DESECRATES PAPAL ALTAR IN ST. PETER'S BASILICA

Most Sacred Heart of Jesus, have mercy upon us. Send forth Thy vengeance, O LORD.

https://www.ilmessaggero.it/vaticano/uomo_nudo_san_pietro_altare_vaticano_basilica_perche_ultime_notizie-7437572.html

Travis Clark - a filthy, perverted Satanic betrayer of Our Lord Jesus Christ and His people!

Fornicating on the altar with a couple of BDSM whores.

A Satanic profanation of the sacred.

Who ordained this piece of human detritus!

https://www.theamericanconservative.com/dreher/archbishop-aymond-new-orleans-travis-clark-kolakovic/

Another priest invalidly ordained due an invalid baptism!

 For the second time in a month we have been aware of a priest invalidly baptised and thus, no sacramental validation followed. 

In both cases, the corrupt Deacon stated, "we baptise." The Vatican recently issued a condemnation of this. Where have they been? 

The real question is this; how many more were invalidly baptised and thus, invalidly ordained with no ability to confect any sacrament but don't know it because they didn't have a video of the fraud perpetuated upon them as these two did?

https://www.catholicnewsagency.com/news/invalidly-baptized-oklahoma-priest-baptized-and-re-ordained-44890

Tabernacle stolen from Canadian Catholic cathedral

Tabernacle stolen from Canadian Catholic cathedral: The Bishop of St. Catharines, Ontario is appealing for thieves to return the consecrated Host after the tabernacle was stolen from the St. Catherine of Alexandria Cathedral on Tuesday.

Update:

The poorly secured tabernacle was found in the Welland Canal. 

Police have released a photo of the thieves. 

New York Jesuit blasphemes Mass and forces congregants to kneel to the Marxist rabble at Black Lives Matter.

No need for me to write much of anything on this other than this. This alleged priest is demonic and has lost the faith. If he were a true priest, he would never have defiled the Holy Sacrifice in such a manner. His order, the Jesuits, are filled with cretins such as these. They will get a severe judgement from God. If you are ever at a Mass you must stand and defy this sacrilege and blasphemy. Then, you must walk out and never return. Do not give one penny of your money to these filthy wretched devils.

For the full story, go here to Father Z!

https://wdtprs.com/2020/09/wacko-new-york-city-jesuits/

How to receive Holy Communion with a face mask. Just say "No!"

Better titled, "How NOT to receive Holy Communion." 

Better there be NO Holy Communion than to follow this ridiculous, preposterous and sacrilegious instruction. Have these people gone mad? How do you remove your mask with the Blessed Sacrament in your hand?

For those of us that attend the traditional Latin Mass, there will be no Holy Communion, it will not be given in the hand, nor will we accept it in the hand. Now, what about my good Oratorian friends at Holy Family? In 2009 during H1N1, they gave Holy Communion in the hand at the Latin Mass in the extraordinary form. Will they do this again?

What insanity!

Christoph Schönborn, Cardinal Archbishop of Vienna lays waste to St. Stephen's Cathedral in a ritual of blasphemy and sacrilege

Christoph Schönborn, Cardinal Archbishop of Vienna recently let St. Stephen's Cathedral for a "rock" music concert featuring a homosexualist Philipp Hochmair pictured above standing on the Communion Rail.

No cause can, not even the "sacred" rite of AIDS fundraising can justify this blasphemy and sacrilege.

What must the laity do to win back our faith and our churches from these rotten men, these wolves, these putrid, effeminate malefactors such as Christoph Schönborn? Are there any Catholics left in Vienna? Are you in Vienna all so corrupted that you cannot see the evil that Schönborn has done by this act? Yet, what can one expect when the Bishop or Rome allowed a light show to be flashed on St. Peter's Basilica on the Feast of the Immaculate Conception? The evil stench comes from Bergoglio to all these filthy monsters. Remember that the malefactor Schönborn, is a great theologian, just like Kasper and that Bergoglio said we should look to him for the correct interpretation of Amoris Laetitia.

This is just plain evil.

If nothing else, it is up to whatever few Catholics are left to publicize this and mock this filthy cleric Schönborn until he repents and does public reparation for this scandal.

But you have turned it into a tavern

How is this even possible?

Look, I get feeding the poor. 

Where's the hall? How about a hotel meeting room?

What a disgrace.

If you go to this web page, you will see his various "encounters" and they all have links with video.

http://w2.vatican.va/content/francesco/en/travels/2017/inside/documents/papa-francesco-cesena-bologna_2017.html

Except for this one.

http://w2.vatican.va/content/francesco/en/events/event.dir.html/content/vaticanevents/en/2017/10/1/visitapastorale-bologna-poveri.html

It seems that the communication manipulators needed to hide the evidence.

Too late.

Father William R. Lugger, Pastor at St. Casimir in Lansing has lost his head!

BREAKING NEWS:

CATHOLIC PRIEST WAKES UP WITH VAGINAL YEAST INFECTION ON HIS HEAD!

LANSING, MI. - In a bizarre medical rarity, a Catholic priest woke up Sunday with his head covered in a yeast infection. Usually known to afflict the, ahem; private parts of some women, the itching and burning infection caused a serious discharge to spew from the mouth of Father William R. (Bill) Luggar. 

"Father" William R. Lugger, is the Pastor of St. Casimir's, an allegedly Catholic Church in Lansing, Michigan. 

In an exclusive interview with Vox Cantoris, Father Lugger said, "I don't know what happened; Sister Donna Quinn of Nuns for Choice, sent me a new biretta and I wanted to wear it at Mass; I thought it was a little queer, but figured that Pope Francis changed the style or something, and when I put it on, my head began to itch and burn."

When told that the hat was a "p***y-hat" Father asked, "Why would anyone wear a cat hat on their head?"

Following an examination earlier today, it was determined that the cause of Father's affliction was a profound lack of supernatural faith associated with the "synthesis of all heresies," known as Modernism, combined with a serious case of Personalism due to an acute propensity for liturgical abuse, moral relativism and a "hermeneutic of discontinuity and rupture."

Further investigation revealed that the condition also affect the part of the brain associated with obedience, tradition and the culture of all things Catholic. It causes one to dispel the notion of penance resulting in eating fried bologna sandwiches on Fridays. 

Of course, given the Inauguration of Donald John Trump as the 45th President of the United States, Vox is certain that Father Lugger confused himself and that while a great day, it was not a Solemnity, thus the Friday fast was not excused. 

William R LuggerJanuary 20 at 9:40am · SPECIAL LUNCH TODAY...St. Casimir fried balagona sandwiches...call me if you're coming

https://www.facebook.com/wloogs

Father Lugger's many defenders on Facebook are most welcome to comment.

Fr. Bill Lugger – lugger@stcas.org

http://www.dioceseoflansing.org/contact

Archbishop Mark Coleridge - The profane heresiarch of Brisbane leaves one to ask, "where are the Catholics there?"

UPDATED:

From a reader in the combox at The Stumbling Block.

"The church is St. Patrick's Fortitude Valley. It is not a closed church. It is listed on the archdiocesan web page and has a Mass schedule."

https://brisbanecatholic.org.au/parishes-mass-times/mass-centre/st-patricks-church-fortitude-valley/

@BneArchdiocese

taylora@bne.catholic.net.au

https://twitter.com/ArchbishopMark

Mark Coleridge is the Archbishop of Brisbane. We've written about this heresiarch before; here, and here. Both, were during the Synod in October 2015. I was going to write another on his comments that the four Cardinals' are unnerved and that their actions issuing a dubia, are "false charity." You can read all about that at EWTNUK by Deacon Nick Donnelly who is really doing incredible work there.

As I was stating, "I was going" to write on that until I came across this,courtesy of Frank Walker at The Stumbling Block and Canon 212, which you can view below.

Good grief, what is wrong with Coleridge?

Does he have any faith? Is he a satanist? A Freemason? A homosexual? He is certainly not a Catholic anymore. He cannot be, it is not possible. Not with the statements he has made and not with this sacrilege. Regardless of whether the Blessed Sacrament is present on not, this is a church owned by the Archdiocese handed over to profane use for money. The altar, crucifix and holy images remain.

Better that the church should have seen the wrecking ball, than this.

No, better that the Coleridge wear sackcloth and ashes crying from the porch crying "Parce Domine, parce populo tuo." But why should the LORD spare His people? Why? If the Catholics of Brisbane, and in particular the Catholic men of Brisbane are two emasculated, two cowardly, too feminised, too drunk on their comfortable lives to stand up to Heresiarch Coleridge, why should I care on the other side of the world?

Because friends, I am a Catholic and so are you. And this Coleridge and what you now see, are straight out of Hell.

Here is one.

Visit The Stumbling Block by clicking on this link to see the rest of this porn, but be prepared to be offended by Coleridge's permission.

Black Mass Sacrilege on this Holy Day. - O Mary assumed into heaven, ever-glorious Virgin Mother of God, pray for us.

https://gloria.tv/article/qz6ooBQUJPGwJnDnnToAo8z7i

Urgent Prayer Request - Cardinal Burke; Planned Black Mass: Please help take action

My dear brothers and sisters in Christ,

I am outraged and most profoundly saddened by the news that a public sacrilegious Black Mass is scheduled to take place in Oklahoma City on the 15th of August, the Feast of the Assumption of the Blessed Virgin Mary. I have also been informed that, after the horrible sacrilege of the Black Mass, a further blasphemy will be perpetrated directly against the Blessed Virgin Mary. All of this is being done with the official sanction of the legitimate authorities.

For this reason, let us turn to the intercession of the Blessed Virgin Mary, through the recitation of the Holy Rosary, to storm Heaven with our prayers to make reparation for these sins and blasphemies that further provoke God's just wrath upon our beloved Nation.

It is the fundamental obligation of every faithful Catholic to stand up for the honor and glory of God and the honor of the Mother of God. In this critical hour, may we not fail to fulfill our obligation of love and devotion toward Our Lord and His heavenly mother.

I ask and beseech each of you to unite with me on this day as I offer Holy Mass and pray a Holy Rosary in reparation to the Sacred Heart of Jesus and the Immaculate Heart of Mary. Let us also pray for the poor souls that are perpetrating these blasphemies.

I urge you to invite your family members, your friends and other fellow Catholics to join in this act of reparation.

Yours devotedly in the Sacred Heart of Jesus and the Immaculate Heart of Mary,

Raymond Leo Cardinal Burke

* ** *** **** ***** ****** ***** **** *** ** *
Take Immediate Action:

Call the Mayor of Oklahoma City, Mick Cornett, and the governor of Oklahoma, Mary Fallin, to voice your opposition to a Black Mass to be followed by the desecration of a Blessed Mother statue, scheduled to take place by satanists at their civic center on Monday, the Feast of the Assumption.

Both offices are taking calls and keeping a tally. Unbelievable that they are allowing this on the grounds of free speech! This situation begs for a moral compass to be applied.

In the United States, call:
Mayor Mick Cornett - 405-297-2424

The days are coming, indeed, they are already here

Originally published on June 26, 2015 and in light of the Abomination of Desolation which took place at Our Saviour's Parish Church in New York City and the heretical and potentially sacrilegious treatment of the Holy Eucharist by the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops, I am re-posting this today as solemn warning.

The Days Are Coming, and Are Already Here

by Giacomo Cardinal Biffi 

The Antichrist, says Soloviev, was "a convinced spiritualist." He believed in goodness, and even in God. He was an ascetic, a scholar, a philanthropist. He gave "the greatest possible demonstrations of moderation, disinterest, and active beneficence."

In his early youth, he had distinguished himself as a talented and insightful exegete: one of his extensive works on biblical criticism had brought him an honorary degree from the University of Tübingen.

But the book that had gained for him universal fame and consensus bore the title: "The Open Road to Universal Peace and Prosperity," in which "a noble respect for ancient traditions and symbols was joined with a sweeping, audacious radicalism toward social and political needs and directives. Limitless freedom of thought was united with a profound comprehension of everything mystical; absolute individualism with an ardent dedication to the common good; the most elevated idealism toward guiding principles with the complete precision and viability of practical solutions."

It is true that some men of faith wondered why the name of Christ did not appear even once, but others replied: "If the contents of the book are permeated with the true Christian spirit, with active love and universal benevolence, what more do you want?" Besides, he "was not in principle hostile to Christ." On the contrary, he appreciated his right intentions and lofty teaching.

But three things about Jesus were unacceptable to him.

First of all, his moral preoccupations. "The Christ," he asserted, "has divided men according to good and evil with his moralism, whereas I will unite them with the benefits that both good and evil alike require."

He also did not like Christ's "absolute uniqueness." He was one of many, or even better – he said – he was my precursor, because I am the perfect and definitive saviour; I have purified his message of what is unacceptable for the men of today.

Finally, and above all, he could not endure the fact that Christ is alive, so much so that he repeated hysterically: "He is not among the living, and will never be. He is not risen, he is not risen, he is not risen. He rotted, he rotted in the tomb…"

But where Soloviev's presentation shows itself to be particularly original and surprising – and merits greater reflection – is in the attribution to the Antichrist of the qualities of pacifist, environmentalist, ecumenist. […]

Did Soloviev have a particular person in mind when he made this description of the Antichrist? It is undeniable that he alludes above all to the "new Christianity" that Leo Tolstoy was successfully promoting during those years. […]

In his "Gospel," Tolstoy reduces all of Christianity to five rules of conduct which he derives from the Sermon on the Mount:

1. Not only must you not kill, but you must not even become angry with your brother.

2. You must not give in to sensuality, not even to the desire for your own wife.

3. You must never bind yourself by swearing an oath.

4. You must not resist evil, but you must apply the principle of non-violence to the utmost and in every case.

5. Love, help, and serve your enemy.

According to Tolstoy, although these precepts come from Christ, they in no way require the actual existence of the Son of the living God to be valid. [...]

Of course, Soloviev does not specifically identify the great novelist with the figure of the Antichrist. But he intuited with extraordinary clairvoyance that Tolstoy's creed would become during the 20th century the vehicle of the substantial nullification of the gospel message, under the formal exaltation of an ethics and a love for humanity presented as Christian "values." [...]

The days will come, Soloviev tells us – and are already here, we say – in which the salvific meaning of Christianity, which can be received only in a difficult, courageous, concrete, and rational act of faith, will be dissolved into a series of "values" easily sold on the world markets.

The greatest of the Russian philosophers warns us that we must guard against this danger. Even if a Tolstoian Christianity were to make us infinitely more acceptable in the living room, at social and political gatherings, and on television, we cannot and must not renounce the Christianity of Jesus Christ, the Christianity that has at its center the scandal of the cross and the astonishing reality of the Lord's resurrection.

Jesus Christ, the crucified and risen Son of God, the only saviour of mankind, cannot be transformed into a series of worthwhile projects and good inspirations, which are part and parcel of the dominant worldly mentality. Jesus Christ is a "rock," as he said of himself. And one either builds upon this "rock” (by entrusting oneself) or lunges against it (through opposition): "He who falls on this stone will be broken to pieces; but when it falls on any one, it will crush him" (Mt. 21:44). [...]

So Soloviev's teaching was simultaneously prophetic and largely ignored. But we want to repropose it in the hope that Christianity will finally catch on to it and pay it a bit of attention.

The new book by Giacomo Cardinal Biffi from which the passage on the Antichrist was taken:

Giacomo Biffi, "Pinocchio, Peppone, l’Anticristo e altre divagazioni [Pinocchio, Peppone, the Antichrist, and other Meanderings],” > Cantagalli, Siena, 2005, pp. 256, euro 14,90.

Link to original: http://chiesa.espresso.repubblica.it/articolo/32418?eng=y

And this:

Soloviev And Our Time

By Giacomo Cardinal Biffi

Vladimir Sergeevic Soloviev passed away 100 years ago, on July 31 (August 13 according to our Gregorian calendar) of the year 1900. He passed away on the threshold of the 20th century -- a century whose vicissitudes and troubles he had foreseen with striking clarity, but also a century, which, tragically, in its historical course and dominant ideologies, would reject his most profound and important teachings. His, therefore, was a teaching at once prophetic and largely unheeded.

A Prophetic Teaching

At the time of the great Russian philosopher, the general view -- in keeping with the limitless optimism of the "belle epoque"' -- foresaw a bright future for humanity in the new century: under the direction and inspiration of the new religion of progress and solidarity stripped of transcendent elements, humanity would enjoy an era of prosperity, peace, justice, security. In the "Excelsior" -- a form of dance, which enjoyed an extraordinary success in the last years of the 19th century (and which later lent its name to countless theaters and hotels) -- this new religion found its own liturgy, as it were. Victor Hugo proclaimed: "This century was great, the one coming will be happy."

But Soloviev refused to allow himself to be swept up in this de-sacralized vision. On the contrary, he predicted with prophetic clarity all of the disasters which in fact occurred.

As early as 1882, in his "Second Discourse on Dostoevsky," Soloviev foresaw -- and condemned -- the sterility and cruelty of the collectivist tyranny which a few years later would oppress Russia and mankind. "The world must not be saved by recourse to force." Soloviev said. "One could imagine men toiling together toward some great end to which they would submit all of their own individual activity; but if this end is imposed on them, if it represents for them something fated and oppressive... then, even if this unity were to embrace all of mankind, universal brotherhood would not be the result, but only a giant anthill." This "anthill" was later constructed through the obtuse and cruel ideology of Lenin and Stalin.

In his final work, The Three Dialogues and the Story of the Antichrist (finished on Easter Sunday 1900), one is struck by how clearly Soloviev foresaw that the 20th century would be "the epoch of great wars, civil strife and revolutions" All this, he said, would prepare the way for the disappearance of "the old structure of separate nations" and "almost everywhere the remains of the ancient monarchical institutions would disappear." This would pave the way for a "United States of Europe."

The accuracy of Soloviev's vision of the great crisis that would strike Christianity at the end of the 20th century is astonishing.

He represents this crisis using the figure of the Antichrist. This fascinating personage will succeed in influencing and persuading almost everyone. It is not difficult to see in this figure of Soloviev the reflection, almost the incarnation, of the confused and ambiguous religiosity of our time.

The Antichrist will be a "convinced spiritualist" Soloviev says, an admirable philanthropist, a committed, active pacifist, a practicing vegetarian, a determined defender of animal rights.

He will also be, among other things, an expert exegete. His knowledge of the bible will even lead the theology faculty of Tubingen to award him an honorary doctorate. Above all, he will be a superb ecumenist, able to engage in dialogue "with words full of sweetness, wisdom and eloquence."

He will not be hostile "in principle" to Christ. Indeed, he will appreciate Christ's teaching. But he will reject the teaching that Christ is unique, and will deny that Christ is risen and alive today.

One sees here described -- and condemned -- a Christianity of "values," of "openings," of "dialogue," a Christianity where it seems there is little room left for the person of the Son of God crucified for us and risen, little room for the actual event of salvation.

A scenario, I think, that should cause us to reflect...

A scenario in which the faith militant is reduced to humanitarian and generically cultural action, the Gospel message is located in an irenic encounter with all philosophies and all religions and the Church of God is transformed into an organization for social work.

Are we sure Soloviev did not foresee what has actually come to pass? Are we sure it is not precisely this that is the most perilous threat today facing the "holy nation" redeemed by the blood of Christ -- the Church?

It is a disturbing question and one we must not avoid.

A Teaching Unheeded

Soloviev understood the 20th century like no one else, but the 20th century did not understand Soloviev.

It isn't that he has not been not recognized and honored. He is often called the greatest Russian philosopher, and few contest this appellation.

Von Balthasar regarded his work "the most universal speculative creation of the modern period" (Gloria III, p. 263) and even goes so far as to set him on the level of Thomas Aquinas.

But there is no doubt that the 20th century, as a whole, gave him no heed. Indeed, the 20th century, at every turn, has gone in the direction opposed to the one he indicated.

The mental attitudes prevalent today, even among many ecclesially active and knowledgeable Christians, are very far indeed from Soloviev's vision of reality.

Among many, here are a few examples:

• Egoistic individualism, which is ever more profoundly leaving its mark on our behaviors and laws;

• Moral subjectivism, which leads people to hold that it is licit and even praiseworthy to assume positions in the legislative and political spheres different from the behavioral norms one personally adheres to;

• Pacifism and non-violence of the Tolstoyan type confused with the Gospel ideals of peace and fraternity to the point of surrendering to tyranny and abandoning the weak and the good to the powerful;

• A theological view which, out of fear of being labeled reactionary, forgets the unity of God's plan, renounces spreading divine truth in all spheres, and abdicates the attempt to live out a coherent Christian life.

In one special way, the 20th century, in its movements and in its social, political and cultural results, strikingly rejected Soloviev's great moral construction. Soloviev held that fundamental ethical principles were rooted in three primordial experiences, naturally present in all men: that is to say, modesty, piety toward others and the religious sentiment.

Yet the 20th century, following an egoistic and unwise sexual revolution, reached levels of permissivism, openly displayed vulgarity and public shamelessness, which seem to have few parallels in history.

Moreover, the 20th century was the most oppressive and bloody of all history, a century without respect for human life and without mercy.

We cannot, certainly, forget the horror of the extermination of the Jews, which can never be execrated sufficiently. But it was not the only extermination. No one remembers the genocide of the Armenians during the First World War.

No one commemorates the tens of millions killed under the Soviet regime.

No one ventures to calculate the number of victims sacrificed uselessly in the various parts of the earth to the communist Utopia.

As for the religious sentiment during the 20th century, in the East for the first time state atheism was both proposed and imposed on a vast portion of humanity, while in the secularized West a hedonistic and libertarian atheism spread until it arrived at the grotesque idea of the "death of God."

In conclusion: Soloviev was undoubtedly a prophet and a teacher, but a teacher who was, in a way, irrelevant. And this, paradoxically, is why he was great and why he is precious for our time.

A passionate defender of the human person and allergic to every philanthropy; a tireless apostle of peace and adversary of pacifism; a promoter of Christian unity and critic of every irenicism: a lover of nature and yet very far from today's ecological infatuations -- in a word, a friend of truth and an enemy of ideology.

Of leaders like him we have today great need.

Born in Milan on June 15, 1928, Biffi was ordained on December 25, 1950. A Milan seminary professor, he became a bishop in 1976, then archbishop of Bologna in 1984 and a cardinal on May 25, 1985.

In Bologna, he is the 110th successor of St. Petronius.

Link to source: http://www.catholicculture.org/culture/library/view.cfm?recnum=3430

Manila's Shame

Sacrilege!

 

Reparation!