“A time is coming when men will go mad, and when they see someone who is not mad, they will attack him, saying, 'You are mad; you are not like us.” ― St. Antony the Great
Maltese Archbishop Scicluna has thrown Pope Bergoglio under the bus. If this little bishop with small hands says he is following the Pope then he has just acknowledged that the Pope's document Amoris Laetitia is full of heresy and sacrilege.
Cardinals and Bishops of the world. Where is your faith?
Do you not fear Christ?
BLOGS | JAN. 30, 2017
Archbishop Scicluna: We Are Following the Pope’s Directives
Maltese prelate defends controversial guidelines on ‘Amoris Laetitia’ in his first interview since they were released. Says in a homily that the faithful should direct questions on the document to Pope Francis.
Edward Pentin
Pope Francis’ comments to Argentine bishops last year on allowing Holy Communion for some civilly remarried divorcees was the blueprint for the Maltese bishops own controversial guidelines on interpreting Amoris Laetitia, Archbishop Charles Scicluna has said.
The archbishop of Malta made the remarks in his first full interview (see transcript below) since he and Bishop Mario Grech of Gozo published their guidelines on the apostolic exhortation on Jan. 13.
“I had another vision of the great tribulation. It seems to me that a concession was demanded from the clergy which could not be granted. I saw many older priests, especially one, who wept bitterly. A few younger ones were also weeping. But others, and the lukewarm among them, readily did what was demanded. It was as if people were splitting into two camps.” Blessed Anne Katherine Emmerich
The priests of Malta must defy their bishops. They cannot follow these two malefactors who would burn incense to Baal. The priests of Malta must stand for Christ and save His people.
I write this as an update to you, the people of Malta and to Catholics everywhere. I was reminded by a writer in the combox that I forgot the second part of my statement, that priests "must defy" their bishops, "no matter the cost."
The "cost" to me, to you, to the Catholics of Malta and to everywhere, is to aid those priests, directly; those priests who take upon themselves the persecution of these malefactors, these devils in clerical dress. We must aid them. That means, making room in our homes, or ensuring they can be supported financially in an apartment whilst they minister. We may, because of this Bergoglio and the lying, sniveling, sycophantic, effeminate minions surrounding him, be forced again in to the catacombs.
Remember what St. Athanasius said, "they have the buildings, but we have the faith." Let the buildings, including St. Peter's Basilica, fall around them. Let it all be destroyed with them in it. Let the condemnation of God come down upon these devils.
Mass in my dining room or your basement chapel will be more beautiful than at the Altar of the Lateran said by a faithful priest, then by these malefactors.
Today, in the real calendar, it is the fest of the Golden-Tongued, John of Antioch, known as, St. John Chrysostom.
In the real Office, Divino Afflatu, we read the Saint's sermon, which follows the Gospel:
“At that
time: Jesus said unto his disciples: Ye
are the salt of the earth: But if the salt have lost his savour, wherewith
shall it be salted?” And so on, and that which followeth.
Consider how that the Lord saith: Ye are the
salt of the earth: by the which figure he sheweth what a necessity of life is
his teaching. By this figure he would
have us know that we have an account to render, not of our own life only, but
for the whole world. Not unto two
cities, nor unto ten, nor unto twenty, nor unto one people, as I sent the
Prophets, so send I you. But I send you
unto every land and sea, even unto the whole world, lying groaning, as it is,
under the burden of divers sins.
These words: Ye are the salt of the earth, shew
unto us the whole nature of man as savourless, and of bad odour through the
corruption of sin. And therefore he
demandeth from his followers such qualities as are most needful and useful to
the furthering of the salvation of many.
He that is lowly in spirit, compassionate, meek, and a seeker after
righteousness, shutteth not up his good things in his own heart, but rather is
like a fountain whence good things freely flow forth unto his neighbour. He that is merciful, whose heart is pure, who
seeketh peace, and who suffereth persecution for the truth's sake, is by the
same token one whose life is for the good of the commonwealth.
Think not, saith the Lord, that the struggle is
easy whereunto ye shall be called, nor that those are paltry things for which
ye shall be held accountable. Ye are the
salt of the earth. What then? Are ye to salt that which is corrupted? Nay, for it is impossible that what is once
corrupted can be made sound by salting it.
This it is not asked of them to do.
Buttheir work is to sprinkle with salt, and to keep fresh thereafter,
such things as the Lord hath given over into their charge, for these things he
himself hath made new, and freed them from all taint, before giving them. Christ's is the power that doth deliver from
the corruption of sin. To preserve from
falling away again is the duty and toil commanded to the Apostles.
Correction: The headline was unclear, that Catholics in Malta organised and paid for a notice in the newspaper there. The effort was undertaken by Veri Catolici which is an international association of Catholics. With apologies for the confusion. Vox. There is
some important information on the matter of the two bishops from the
nation-state of Malta, -- the Island of Malta itself and of Gozo. Much more is
revealed about Mario Grech of Gozo, in particular.
Charles
Scicluna of Malta and Mario Grech of Gozo
As you are
no doubt aware, these two bishops have declared that as long as someone in
grievous mortal sin, such as adultery, is at "peace with God," then
they are free to receive Holy Communion. It's a position praised by the
perverted alphabet community of Malta, so we can imagine that sodomy is the
next to be declared a non-sin.
Further,
it has been reported that Grech has threatened his priests with suspension,
should they not go along with his demand that they commit sacrilege and error,
and the people, greater mortal sin. As I wrote a few days ago, why should he be
believed now given the fact that Grech, along with Scicluna, are advocating
sacrilege and mortal sin?
Priests
pleaded with Rome and Cardinal Marx of the Bishops Conference in Europe not to
see Grech appointed as Archbishop of Malta due to "reprehensible behaviour."
Grech
failed to carry out the Vatican's order to defrock perverted priests who
allegedly threatened to expose other cases of sexual abuse by priests.
He
possessed the "grin of a Cheshire Cat" and was the "embodiment
of a heady combination of spiritual authority and power with the lack of human
accountability," in addition to a "manifest attachment to material
wealth."
He was
also accused in no uncertain term of being a "bully," creating a
"bullying culture" in the local Church and being obsessed with of
thriving in a "media spin culture."
Gozo
continued, at least in 2015, to live at "home with his parents," and
was accused of nepotism!
This
man accused of being a "bully" is now telling us he did not threaten
his priests. He is now using Facebook and other sources working within a "media spin culture?"
"I
appreciate the trust which the great majority have in us bishops, but at the
same time it pains me when I notice that, among the flock, there are those who
are not only rigid (strict) towards themselves, but would also be rigid towards
others, and so are confusing you. Indeed, they would say that it is us, the
bishops, who are confusing you! If you want a guarantee that our teaching is
that of the Church, I assure you that myself and the Archbishop are in complete
unity with Pope Francis."
Grech
declares that the Bishop of Rome agrees with him and Scicluna and that it
matters not what sin one has committed, but if one is at peace with God, then
sacramental confession, absolution and a firm purpose of amendment is no longer
necessary. That is what the implication is of what they said and wrote.
Pope
Bergoglio is now well in to a corner. He has placed himself there and the light
is being shone upon his error and confirmed, even mostly by his own minions. As of the morning of January 25, on this Feast of the Conversion of St. Paul, so familiar as he was with Malta, the Catholic faithful of Malta have gone so far as to take out a newspaper advertisement exhorting that their bishops be faithful. How bad has it become? How evil can these two men be along with hundreds, maybe a few thousand other bishops and cardinals and tens of thousands of priests and maybe even the Pope himself, that it has come to this. The faithful begging their shepherds to be Catholic. The picture is below and a readable and printable PDF can be found at this link organised by Veri Catholici at:
Did you know that Malta is a sodomite priest playground?
Oh, you didn't?
Well, you do now! My priest contacts who have confirmed this, have told me that they will not travel there, unless it is on official Church business; and any priest that does go there on vacation, is suspected.
“In issuing these guidelines, the Maltese Bishops have shown admirable pastoral care. While building on the results of the Synod on the Family and on the teachings of Pope Francis, in continuity with the teachings of preceding popes, the language used by the Maltese Bishops as well as the way in which such complex situations are addressed feel fresh and new, and they truly show that the Church is a Mother who teaches and loves all her children, whoever and wherever they may be,” the group said.
According to Edward Pentin, the two travelled to Rome this week. One would like to think that they were hauled in before the Prefect of the Doctrine of the Faith and then before the Pope and were stripped of their bishoprics.
Ha, not likely!
Rather they were celebrated by the filthy sodomitical scum in clerics that have infiltrated the highest levels of the Church.
In a stunning report in Osservatore Romano, the Vatican
City State's own newspaper, the Bishops of Malta have declared themselves
heretics and have placed themselves outside the Holy Catholic Church. There is
simply no other way to look at the situation given what they have said.
Below is the head of the Maltese Bishop's Conference,
Charles Scicluna. As the video reveals, he sure likes the limelight. A real
rock star is the pathetic curse upon the Church, that is this man.
In a statement that will now sanction not only adultery but
the open and ongoing sin of sacrilege, the bishops have said that:
“If a separated or divorced person who is living in a new
relationship manages, with an informed and enlightened conscience, to
acknowledge and believe that he or she are at peace with God, he or she cannot
be precluded from participating in the sacraments of Reconciliation and the
Eucharist”.
They also state that avoiding sex may be "humanly
impossible."
A most interesting statement, no doubt, particularly coming from men who are to be
not only celibate, but chaste.
Perhaps some of these Maltese bishops speak from experience,
eh?
How about some sodomy and play with the girlie-boy down the
lane? Perhaps some Saturday night
pornography followed by a flurry of self-abuse? Maybe the immoral, but natural thing of bedding down for
a night with an actual woman! Pfft, a woman - what would these effeminates know about a woman!
After all, if the Bishops of Malta think that it is
"humanly impossible" to avoid sexual sin, then they must be speaking
from experience and that includes this pathetic Judas, Scicluna!
Here's the whole lot of them, the whole disgraceful mess of
apostates! UPDATE: In spite of complaints from a few, I insist on listing all Maltese bishops here, even those who are Nuncios and who have nothing directly to do with the two bishops from Malta, who have undertaken this. The reason is clear, they must rebuke their brothers!
John Paul II and Benedict XVI reaffirmed the Church’s
perennial teaching that divorced and remarried Catholics cannot receive
Communion, except possibly when they endeavour to live “as brother and
sister."
The fact that this is happening can be lead straight to the
feet of Jorge Bergoglio. There can be no holding back now of the four
Cardinals, and more still, who are prepared to challenge this wrong-headed, and
faithless, scandalous, malefactor on the Seat of Peter. This is his fault. This is Bergoglio's doing. Perhaps, just perhaps, the Maltese bishops have done us a big favour. This is going to blow up and put Bergoglio in the corner where he belongs. Jorge Bergoglio must be held to account for his error and
the heretical and sacrilegious
permission in Amoris Laetitia. He did it. This is his work and it must
be denounced.
The Pope must recant and repent. If he dies before doing
this, his judgement with Our Lord Jesus Christ will be severe.
1. The
Maltese bishops have fallen completely for the canonically and
ecclesiologically false view that an individual’s assessment of his or her own
readiness to receive holy Communion (see c. 916) controls a minister’s decision
to administer the sacrament (see c. 915). In Malta now, anyone who approaches
for the sacraments should be recognized as being “at peace with God”. Objective
evidence to the contrary is simply no longer relevant. Canon 916 is thus
eviscerated, Canon 915 is effectively repudiated.
2. The
Maltese bishops do not seem to know what the word “conjugal” means. They think
that non-married people can practice “conjugal” virtues and that they can
decide about whether to engage in “conjugal” acts. Nonsense and, coming from
bishops, inexcusable nonsense at that. Non-married people can have sex, of
course, but Catholic pastoral integrity does not hold such sexual acts on par
with the physically identical, but truly conjugal, acts as performed by married
persons.
3. The
Maltese bishops, by extending their document to the sacrament of
Reconciliation, have basically instructed their priests not to withhold
absolution from divorced-and-remarried Catholics who refuse to repent of their
“public and permanent adultery” (CCC 2384) even to the point of abstaining from
sexual (nb: sexual not “conjugal”) relations. Incredibly, such a directive
raises the specter of green-lighting sacrilegious confessions and the
commission of solicitation in confession. No priest should want either on his
conscience, let alone both.
4. The
Maltese bishops even managed to take swipes at Baptism and Confirmation by
opening the door to divorced-and-remarried Catholics serving as godparents
contrary to the expectations of Canon 874 § 1, 3º. See CLSA New Comm (2001)
1062-1063.
