Nothing
is lost with peace. All can be lost with war. Let men return to understanding.
Let them resume negotiating. Negotiating with good will and with respect for
each other’s rights, let them realize that an honorable success is never
precluded when there are sincere and active negotiations. And they will feel
great – with true greatness – if imposing silence on the voices of passion,
whether collective or private, and leaving reason to its proper domain, they
will spare their brothers bloodshed and their homeland ruin.
Thus
it was that on August 24, 1939, Pius XII addressed both rulers and peoples as
war was imminent. These were not words of empty pacifism, nor of complicit
silence about the multiple violations of justice that were being carried out in
many quarters. In that radio message, which some people still remember hearing,
the appeal of the Roman Pontiff invoked “respect for each other’s rights” as a
prerequisite for fruitful peace negotiations.
The
Media Narrative
If
we look at what is happening in Ukraine, without being misled by the gross
falsifications of the mainstream media, we realize that respect for each
other’s rights has been completely ignored; indeed, we have the impression that
the Biden Administration, NATO and the European Union deliberately want to
maintain a situation of obvious imbalance, precisely to make impossible any
attempt at a peaceful resolution of the Ukrainian crisis, provoking the Russian
Federation to trigger a conflict. Herein lies the seriousness of the problem.
This is the trap set for both Russia and Ukraine, using both of them to enable
the globalist elite to carry out its criminal plan.
It
should not surprise us that pluralism and freedom of speech, so praised in
countries that claim to be democratic, are daily disavowed by censorship and
intolerance towards opinions not aligned with the official narrative.
Manipulations of this kind have become the norm during the so-called pandemic,
to the detriment of doctors, scientists and dissenting journalists, who have
been discredited and ostracized for the mere fact of daring to question the
effectiveness of experimental serums. Two years later, the truth about the
adverse effects and the unfortunate management of the health emergency has
proven them right, but the truth is stubbornly ignored because it does not
correspond to what the system wanted and still wants today.
If
the world media have so far been able to lie shamelessly on a matter of strict
scientific relevance, spreading lies and hiding reality, we should ask ourselves
why, in the present situation, they should suddenly rediscover that
intellectual honesty and respect for the code of ethics widely denied with
COVID.
But
if this colossal fraud has been supported and disseminated by the media, it
must be recognized that national and international health institutions,
governments, magistrates, law enforcement agencies and the Catholic hierarchy
itself all share responsibility for the disaster – each in its own sphere by
actively supporting or failing to oppose the narrative – a disaster that has affected billions of
people in their health, their property, the exercise of their individual rights
and even their very lives. Even in this case, it is difficult to imagine that
those who have been guilty of such crimes in support of a pandemic that was
intended and maliciously amplified could suddenly have a jolt of dignity and
show solicitude for their citizens and their homeland when a war threatens
their security and their economy.
These,
of course, can be the prudent reflections of those who want to remain neutral
and look with detachment and almost disinterest at what is happening around
them. But if we deepen our knowledge of the facts and document them, relying on
authoritative and objective sources, we discover that doubts and perplexities
soon become disturbing certainties.
Even
if we only want to limit our investigation to the economic aspect, we
understand that news agencies, politics and public institutions themselves
depend on a small number of financial groups belonging to an oligarchy that,
significantly, is united not only by money and power, but by the ideological
affiliation that guides its action and interference in the politics of nations
and the whole world. This oligarchy shows its tentacles in the UN, NATO, the
World Economic Forum, the European Union, and in “philanthropic” institutions
such as George Soros’ Open Society and the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.
All
these entities are private and answer to no one but themselves, and at the same
time they have the power to influence national governments, including through
their own representatives who are made to be elected or appointed to key posts.
They admit it themselves, when they are received with all the honors by heads
of state and world leaders, respected and feared by these leaders as the true
masters of the fate of the world. Thus, those who hold power in the name of the
“people” find themselves trampling on the people’s will and restricting their
rights, in order to be obedient courtiers to masters whom nobody has elected
but who nevertheless dictate their political and economic agenda to the
nations.
We
come then to the Ukraine crisis, which is presented to us as a consequence of
Vladimir Putin’s expansionist arrogance towards an independent and democratic
nation over which he is trying to claim absurd rights. The “warmonger Putin” is
said to be massacring the defenseless population, who have courageously arisen
to defend the soil of their homeland, the sacred borders of their nation and
the violated freedoms of the citizens. The European Union and the United
States, “defenders of democracy,” are therefore said to be unable not to
intervene by means of NATO to restore Ukraine’s autonomy, drive out the
“invader” and guarantee peace. In the face of the “tyrant’s arrogance,” it is
said that the peoples of the world ought to form a common front, imposing
sanctions on the Russian Federation and sending soldiers, weapons and economic
aid to “poor” President Zelenskyy, “national hero” and “defender” of his people.
As proof of Putin’s “violence,” the media spread images of bombings, military
searches, and destruction, attributing responsibility to Russia. And there’s
still more: precisely in order to guarantee a “lasting peace,” the European
Union and NATO are opening wide their arms to welcome Ukraine as members. And
in order to prevent “Soviet propaganda”, Europe is now blacking out Russia
Today and Sputnik, in order to ensure that information is “free and
independent.”
This
is the official narrative, to which everyone conforms. Being at war, dissent
immediately becomes desertion, and those who dissent are guilty of treason and
deserving of more or less serious sanctions, starting with public execration
and ostracism, well experienced with COVID against those who are “un-vaxxed”.
But the truth, if you want to know it, allows us to see things differently and
to judge the facts for what they are and not for how they are presented to us.
This is a true and proper unveiling, as indicated by the etymology of the Greek
word ἀλήθεια. Or perhaps, with an eschatological gaze, a revelation, an ἀποκάλυψις.
The
expansion of NATO
First
of all, it is necessary to remember the facts, which do not lie and are not
susceptible to alteration. And the facts, however irritating they are to recall
to those who try to censor them, tell us that since the fall of the Berlin Wall
the United States has extended its sphere of political and military influence
to almost all the satellite states of the former Soviet Union, even recently,
annexing into NATO Poland, the Czech Republic, and Hungary (1999); Estonia,
Latvia, Lithuania, Slovenia, Slovakia, Bulgaria and Romania (2004); Albania and
Croatia (2009); Montenegro (2017); and North Macedonia (2020). The North
Atlantic Treaty Organization is preparing to expand to Ukraine, Georgia, Bosnia
and Herzegovina, and Serbia. Practically speaking, the Russian Federation is
under military threat – from weapons and missile bases – just a few kilometers
from its borders, while it has no military base in similar proximity to the
United States.
To
be considering the possible expansion of NATO into Ukraine, without thinking
that it will arouse Russia’s legitimate protests, is nothing short of puzzling,
especially given the fact that in 1991 NATO pledged to the Kremlin not to
expand further. Not only that: at the end of 2021, Der Spiegel published drafts
of a treaty with the United States and an agreement with NATO on security
guarantees (here, here and here). Moscow demanded legal guarantees from its
Western partners that would prevent NATO from further eastward expansion by
adding Ukraine to the alliance and also from establishing military bases in
post-Soviet countries. The proposals also contained a clause on the
non-deployment of offensive weapons by NATO near Russia’s borders and on the
withdrawal of NATO forces in Eastern Europe back to their 1997 positions.
As
we can see, NATO has failed to keep its commitments to Russia, or has at least
forced the situation at a very delicate moment for geopolitical balances. We
should ask ourselves why the United States – or rather the American deep state
which regained power after the electoral fraud that brought Joe Biden to the
White House – wants to create tensions with Russia and involve its European
partners in the conflict, with all the consequences we can imagine.
As
General Marco Bertolini, former commander of the Joint Summit Operational
Command, has lucidly observed: “The United States did not just win the Cold War
but also wanted to humiliate [Russia] by taking everything that in a certain
sense fell within its area of influence. [Putin] bore with the Baltic
countries, Poland, Romania and Bulgaria [joining NATO]. Faced with Ukraine
[joining NATO], which would have taken away any possibility of access to the
Black Sea, he reacted” (here). And he adds: “There is a problem of the regime’s
stability, a situation has arisen with a fairly unlikely prime minister
[Zelenskyy], one who comes from the world of entertainment.” The general does
not fail to recall, in the case of a US attack on Russia, that “the Global
Hawks flying over Ukraine depart from Sigonella [Italy]; Italy is an American
military base in large part. The risk is there, it is present and real” (here).
Interests
arising from the blockade of Russian gas supplies
We
should also ask ourselves whether, behind the destabilization of the delicate
balance between the European Union and Russia, there are also economic
interests, deriving from the need of EU countries to obtain American liquid gas
(for which we also need the regasification plants which many nations are
deprived of, and for which in any case we will have to pay much more) instead
of Russian gas (which is more ecological).
The
decision of Italian oil and gas company ENI to suspend investments in Gazprom’s
Blue Stream pipeline (from Russia to Turkey) also entails the deprivation of an
additional source of supply, since it feeds the Trans-Atlantic Pipeline (from
Turkey to Italy).
It
therefore does not sound like a coincidence if, in August 2021, Zelenskyy
declared that he considered the Nord Stream 2 pipeline between Russia and
Germany as “a dangerous weapon, not only for Ukraine but for all of Europe”
(here): bypassing Ukraine, it deprives Kyiv of about one billion euros per year
in revenue from transit tariffs. “We view this project exclusively through the
prism of security and consider it a dangerous geopolitical weapon of the
Kremlin” the Ukrainian president said, agreeing with the Biden administration.
American Undersecretary of State Victoria Nuland said: “If Russia invades
Ukraine, Nord Stream 2 will not go forward.” And so it has happened, not
without serious economic damage to German investments.
The
Pentagon’s virological laboratories in Ukraine
Still
on the subject of American interests in Ukraine, it is worth mentioning the
virological laboratories located in Ukraine which are under the control of the
Pentagon and where it seems that only US specialists with diplomatic immunity
are employed directly under the American Ministry of Defense.
We
should also remember the complaint made by Putin regarding the collection of
genomic data about the population, which can be used for bacteriological
weapons with genetic selection (here, here and here). Information about the
activity of laboratories in Ukraine is obviously difficult to confirm, but it
is understandable that the Russian Federation considered, not without reason,
that these laboratories could constitute an additional bacteriological threat
to the safety of the population. The U.S. Embassy has removed all files related
to the Biological Threat Reduction Program from its website (here).
Maurizio
Blondet writes:
Event
201, which simulated the pandemic explosion a year before it happened, was
attended (along with the usuals, Bill and Melinda) by the apparently
inoffensive John Hopkins University with its blessed Center for Health
Security. The humanitarian institution had for a long time a less innocent
name: it was called Center for Civilian Biodefense Strategies and did not deal
with the health of Americans, but rather with its opposite: the response to
military attacks of bio-terrorism. It was practically a civil-military
organization. When it held its first conference in February 1999 in Crystal
City in Arlington [Virginia], where the Pentagon is located, it brought
together 950 doctors, military personnel, federal officials and health
officials to participate in a simulation exercise. The aim of the simulation is
to counter an imagined “militarized” smallpox attack. It is only the first of
the exercises that will blossom in Event 201 and in the Pandemic Imposture
(here).
Experiments
also emerge on the Ukrainian military (here) and interventions by the American
Embassy regarding the Ukrainian Prosecutor Lutsenko in 2016 so that he would
not investigate “a billionaire round of funds between G. Soros and B. Obama”
(here).
An
indirect threat to China’s expansionist ambitions on Taiwan
The
current Ukrainian crisis entails secondary, but no less serious, consequences
on the geopolitical balance between China and Taiwan. Russia and Ukraine are
the only producers of palladium and neon, which are indispensable for the
production of microchips.
Moscow’s
possible retaliation has attracted more attention in recent days after market
research group Techcet published a report highlighting the dependence of many
semiconductor manufacturers on materials of Russian and Ukrainian origin such
as neon, palladium and others. According to Techcet’s estimates, more than 90%
of U.S. supplies of semiconductor neon come from Ukraine, while 35% of U.S.
palladium comes from Russia. […] According to the US International Trade
Commission, neon prices rose by 600% before Russia’s annexation of the Crimean
peninsula in 2014, because chip companies relied on some Ukrainian companies
[…]
If
it is true that a Chinese invasion of Formosa would put the global technology
supply chain at risk, it is also true that a sudden shortage of raw materials
from Russia could stop production, so as to make the island lose the “microchip
shield” and induce Beijing to attempt the annexation of Taipei. (SOURCE)
Biden’s
conflict of interest in Ukraine
Another
issue that we tend not to analyze in depth is that related to Burisma, an oil
and gas company operating on the Ukrainian market since 2002.
[D]uring
the American presidency of Barack Obama (from 2009 to 2017) his right hand man
with a “delegation” to handle international politics was Joe Biden, and it is
since then that the “protection’ offered by the Democrat US leader was given to
Ukrainian nationalists, a line that created the irreconcilable disagreement
between Kiev and Moscow. […] It was Joe Biden in those years who carried out
the policy of bringing Ukraine closer to NATO. He wanted to take away political
and economic power from Russia. […] In recent years, Joe Biden’s name has also
been associated with a scandal over Ukraine that had also shaken his candidacy.
[…] It was April 2014 when Burisma Holdings, the largest energy company in
Ukraine (active in both gas and oil), hired Hunter Biden as a consultant […]
with a salary of $50,000 a month. All transparent, except that during those
months Joe Biden continued the American policy aimed at regaining possession by
Ukraine of those areas of the Donbass that have now become Republics recognized
by Russia. The Donetsk area is believed to be rich in unexplored gas fields
that have been targeted by Burisma Holdings. An international policy
intertwined with the economic one that made the American media turn up their
noses in those years (SOURCE).
Democrats
claimed that Trump had created a media scandal to harm Biden’s campaign, but
his accusations turned out to be true. Joe Biden himself, during a meeting at
the Rockefeller Council for Foreign Relations, admitted to having intervened on
then-President Petro Poroshenko and Prime Minister Arsenij Yatseniuk to prevent
investigations into his son Hunter by Procurator General Viktor Shokin. Biden
had threatened “to withhold a billion dollars loan guarantee in the United
States during a December 2015 trip to Kiev,” reports the New York Post. “If
[the Procurator General Shokin] is not fired, you will not have the money”
(here and here). And the Prosecutor was effectively fired, saving Hunter from
further scandal.
Biden’s
interference in Kyiv politics, in exchange for favors to Burisma and corrupt
oligarchs, confirms the current US President’s interest in protecting his
family and image, fueling disorder in Ukraine and even a war. How can a person
who uses his role to take care of his own interests and cover up the crimes of
his family members govern honestly and without being subject to blackmail?
The
Ukrainian nuclear question
Finally,
there is the issue of Ukrainian nuclear weapons. On February 19, 2022, at a
conference in Munich, Zelenskyy announced his intention to end the Budapest
Memorandum (1994), which prohibits Ukraine from developing, proliferating and
using atomic weapons. Among the other clauses of the Memorandum, there is also
the one that obliges Russia, the United States and the United Kingdom to
refrain from using economic pressure on Ukraine to influence its policy: the
pressure of the IMF and the United States to grant economic aid in exchange for
reforms consistent with the Great Reset represent a further violation of the
agreement.
The
Ukrainian Ambassador in Berlin, Andriy Melnyk, argued on Deutschlandfunkradio
in 2021 that Ukraine needed to regain nuclear status if the country failed to
join NATO. Ukraine’s nuclear power plants are operated, rebuilt and maintained
by the state-owned enterprise NAEK Energoatom, which completely ended its
relationship with Russian companies between 2018 and 2021. Its main partners
are companies that can be traced back to the US government. It is easy to
understand how the Russian Federation considers the possibility of Ukraine
acquiring nuclear weapons as a threat and demands Kyiv’s adherence to the
non-proliferation pact.
—
Article continues below Petition —
PLEDGE:
Pray for Peace in Ukraine!
5683
have signed the petition.
Let's
get to 6000!
The
color revolution in Ukraine and the independence of Crimea, Donetsk and Lugansk
In
2013, after the government of President Viktor Yanukovych decided to suspend
the association agreement between Ukraine and the European Union and to forge
closer economic relations with Russia, a series of protest demonstrations known
as Euromaidan began, which lasted several months and culminated in the
revolution that overthrew Yanukovych and led to the installation of a new
government. It was an operation sponsored by George Soros, as he candidly told
CNN: “I have had a foundation in Ukraine since before it became independent of
Russia; this foundation has always been in business and has played a decisive
role in today’s events” (here, here and here).
This
change of government provoked the reaction of Yanukovych’s supporters and of a
part of the Ukrainian population opposed to the pro-Western shift of Ukraine,
which had not been wanted by the population but was obtained by a color
revolution, of which there had been general rehearsals in previous years in
Georgia, Moldova and Belarus.
Following
the clashes of May 2, 2014, in which nationalist paramilitary fringes
(including those of Pravyi Sektor) also intervened, there was also the massacre
in Odessa. The Western press also spoke of these terrible events in a
scandalized way; Amnesty International (here) and the UN denounced these crimes
and documented their brutality. But no international court initiated any
proceedings against those responsible, as is intended to be done today against
the alleged crimes of the Russian army.
Among
the many agreements not respected is also the Minsk Protocol, signed on
September 5, 2014 by the Trilateral Contact Group on Ukraine, composed of
representatives of Ukraine, Russia, the Donetsk People’s Republic and the
Lugansk People’s Republic. Among the points of the agreement was also the
removal of armed illegal groups, military equipment, as well as fighters and
mercenaries from the territory of Ukraine under the supervision of the OSCE and
the disarmament of all illegal groups. Contrary to what was agreed, neo-Nazi
paramilitary groups are not only officially recognized by the government, but
their members are even given official assignments.
Also
in 2014, Crimea, Donetsk and Lugansk declared their independence from Ukraine –
in the name of self-determination of peoples recognized by the international
community – and declared themselves annexed to the Russian Federation. The
Ukrainian government still refuses to recognize the independence of these
regions, sanctioned by popular referendum, and leaves the neo-Nazi militias and
the regular military forces themselves free to rage against the population,
since it considers these entities as terrorist organizations. It is true that
the two referendums of November 2, 2014 constitute a stretching of the Minsk
Protocol, which provided only for a decentralization of power and a form of
special status for the Donetsk and Lugansk regions.
As
Professor Franco Cardini recently pointed out, “on February 15, 2022, Russia
delivered to the United States a draft of a treaty to end this situation and
defend the Russian-speaking populations. Wastepaper. This war began in 2014”
(hereand here).
And
it was a war in the intentions of those who wanted to fight the Russian
minority of Donbass: “We will have a job and pensions, and they will not. We
will receive bonuses for having children, and they will not. Our children will
have schools and kindergartens; their children will stay in the basements. In this
way we will win this war,” said President Petro Poroshenko in 2015 (here). It
will not escape notice that these measures are similar to the discrimination
against the so-called “un-vaxxed,” who have been deprived of work, pay and
education. Eight years of bombing in Donetsk and Lugansk, with hundreds of
thousands of victims, 150 dead children, and very serious cases of torture,
rape, kidnapping and discrimination (here).
On
February 18, 2022 the Presidents of Donetsk and Lugansk, Denis Pushilin and
Leonid Pasechnik, ordered the evacuation of the civilian population of their
provinces into the Russian Federation due to the ongoing clashes between the
Donbass People’s Militia and the Ukrainian Armed Forces. On February 21, the
State Duma (Lower House of the Russian Parliament) unanimously ratified the
treaties of friendship, cooperation and mutual assistance introduced by
President Putin with the Donetsk and Lugansk People’s Republics. At the same
time, the Russian President ordered the sending of troops from the Russian
Federation to restore peace in the Donbass region.
Here
one may wonder why, in a situation of blatant violation of human rights by
neo-Nazi military forces and paramilitary apparatuses (who fly flags bearing
swastikas and display the effigy of Aldolf Hitler) against the Russian-speaking
population of the independent republics, the international community feels
obliged to consider the intervention of the Russian Federation worthy of
condemnation, and indeed to blame Putin for the violence. Where is the
much-vaunted right of the people to self-determination, which was held valid on
August 24, 1991 for the proclamation of Ukraine’s independence and recognized
by the international community? And why are we scandalized today by a Russian
intervention in Ukraine, when NATO carried out the same sort of thing in
Yugoslavia (1991), Kosovo (1999), Afghanistan (2001), Iraq (2003), and in Libya
and Syria (2011), without anyone raising any objections? Not to mention that in
the last ten years Israel has repeatedly hit military targets in Syria, Iran
and Lebanon to prevent the creation of a hostile armed front on its northern
border, and yet no nation has proposed imposing sanctions on Tel Aviv.
It
is dismaying to see with what hypocrisy the European Union and the United
States – Brussels and Washington – are giving their unconditional support to
President Zelenskyy, whose government for eight years now has continued to
persecute Russian-speaking Ukrainians with impunity (here), for whom it is even
forbidden to speak in their own language, in a nation that includes numerous
ethnic groups, of which those who speak Russian represent 17.2%. And it is
scandalous that they are silent about the use of civilians as human shields by
the Ukrainian army, which places anti-aircraft positions inside population
centers, hospitals, schools and kindergartens precisely so that their
destruction can cause deaths among the population.
The
mainstream media is careful not to show images of Russian soldiers helping
civilians reach safe positions (here and here) or organizing humanitarian
corridors, which Ukrainian militias fire upon (here and here). Just as it is
also silent about the settling of scores, massacres, violence and theft by
fringes of the civilian population, to whom Zelenskyy has given weapons: the
videos that can be seen on the internet give an idea of the climate of civil
war that has been artfully fueled by the Ukrainian Government. To this we may
also add the convicts released to be drafted into the Army and also the
volunteers of the foreign legion: a mass of fanatics without rules and without
training that will contribute to worsening the situation, making it
unmanageable.
As
has been pointed out by many parties, the candidacy and election of Ukrainian
President Zelenskyy corresponds to that recent cliché, inaugurated in recent
years, of a comic actor or entertainment personality being lent to politics. Do
not believe that being without a suitable cursus honorum is an obstacle to the
rising to the top of institutions; on the contrary: the more a person is
apparently a stranger to the world of political parties, the more it is to be
assumed that his success is determined by those who hold power. Zelenskyy’s
performances in drag are perfectly consistent with the LGBTQ ideology that is
considered by its European sponsors as an indispensable requirement of the
“reform” agenda that every country ought to embrace, along with gender
equality, abortion and the green economy. No wonder Zelenskyy, a member of the
WEF (here), was able to benefit from the support of Schwab and his allies to
come to power and ensure that the Great Reset would also be carried out in
Ukraine.
The
57-part television series that Zelenskyy produced and starred in, demonstrates
that the media planned his candidacy for President of Ukraine and his election
campaign. In the fiction show The Servant of the People he played the part of a
high school teacher who unexpectedly became President of the Republic and
fought against the corruption of politics. It is no coincidence that the
series, which was absolutely mediocre, still won the WorldFest Remi Award(USA,
2016), came among the top four finalists in the category of comedy films at the
Seoul International Drama Awards (South Korea) and was awarded the Intermedia
Globe Silver award in the entertainment TV series category at the World Media
Film Festival in Hamburg.
The
media stir obtained by Zelenskyy with the television series brought him over 10
million followers on Instagram and created the premise for the establishment of
the homonymous Servant of the People political party, of which Ivan Bakanov,
General Manager and shareholder (along with Zelenskyy himself and the oligarch
Kolomoisky) of Kvartal 95 Studio, and the owner of the TV 1+1 television
network, is also a member. Zelenskyy’s image is an artificial product, a media
fiction, an operation of manipulation of consensus that has managed to create
the political character in the Ukrainian collective imagination that in
reality, and not in fiction, has conquered power.
“Just
one month before the 2019 elections that saw him win, Zelenskyy sold the
company [Kvartal 95 Studio] to a friend, still finding a way to get the
proceeds of the business he had officially renounced to his family. That friend
was Serhiy Shefir, who was later appointed Councilor to the Presidency. […] The
sale of the shares took place for the benefit of Maltex Multicapital Corp., a
company owned by Shefir and registered in the British Virgin Islands” (here).
The
current Ukrainian President promoted his election campaign with a commercial
that was disturbing, to say the least (here), in which, holding two machine
guns, he fired on members of Parliament, pointed out as corrupt or subservient
to Russia.
The
fight against corruption trumpeted by the Ukrainian President in the role of
“servant of the people” does not correspond, however, to the picture that
emerges of him from the so-called Pandora papers, in which 40 million dollars
appear to have been paid to him on the eve of the elections by the Jewish
billionaire Kolomoisky[1] through offshore accounts (here, here and here).[2]
In his homeland, many accuse him of having taken power away from the
pro-Russian oligarchs not to give it to the Ukrainian people, but rather to
strengthen his own interest group and at the same time remove his political
adversaries:
He
liquidated the ministers of the old guard, first of all the powerful Minister
of the Interior, [Arsen] Avakov. He rudely retired the president of the
Constitutional Court who was acting as a check on his laws. He closed seven
opposition TV channels. He arrested and accused of treason Viktor Medvedcuk, a
pro-Russian sympathizer but above all the leader of the Platform of Opposition
– For Life party, the second party of the Ukrainian Parliament after his
Servant of the People party. He is also placing on trial for treason former
President Poroshenko, who was suspicious of everyone except for those who got
along with the Russians or their friends. The mayor of Kiev, the popular former
world boxing champion Vitaly Klitchko, has already been subjected to several
searches and seizures. In short, Zelenskyy seems to want to make a clean sweep
of anyone who is not aligned with his politics (here).
On
April 21, 2019, Zelenskyy was elected President of Ukraine with 73.22% of the
votes, and on May 20 he was sworn in. On May 22, 2019 he appointed Ivan
Bakanov, Director General of Kvartal 95, as First Deputy Head of the Security
Services of Ukraine and Head of the Main Directorate for the Fight against Corruption
and Organized Crime of the Central Directorate of the Security Service of
Ukraine. Along with Bakanov, it is worth mentioning Mykhailo Fedorov, Vice
President and Minister of Digital Transformation, a member of the World
Economic Forum (here). Zelenskyy himself has admitted to having as his
inspiration the Prime Minister of Canada Justin Trudeau (here and here).
Zelenskyy’s
relations with the IMF and the WEF
As
Greece’s tragic precedent has shown, national sovereignties and the popular
will expressed by parliaments are de facto erased by the decisions of
international high finance, which interferes with government policies by means
of blackmail and outright extortion of an economic nature. The case of Ukraine,
which is one of the poorest countries in Europe, is no exception.
Shortly
after Zelenskyy’s election, the International Monetary Fund threatened not to
grant Ukraine a $5 billion loan if he did not comply with their demands. During
a telephone conversation with the CEO of the IMF, Kristalina Georgieva, the
Ukrainian President was rebuked for replacing Yakiv Smolii with a man he
trusted, Kyrylo Shevchenko, who was less inclined to comply with the diktats of
the IMF. Anders Åslund writes at Atlantic Council:
The
problems surrounding the Zelenskyy government are mounting alarmingly. First of
all, since March 2020, the President has led a reversal not only of the reforms
pursued under him, but also those initiated by his predecessor Petro
Poroshenko. Second, his government has not presented plausible proposals to
resolve IMF concerns about Ukraine’s unfulfilled commitments. Third, the
President appears to no longer have a ruling parliamentary majority, and he
seems uninterested in forming a reformist majority (here).
It
is evident that the IMF’s interventions are aimed at obtaining the Ukrainian
government’s commitment to align itself with the economic, fiscal and social
policies dictated by the globalist agenda, beginning with the “independence” of
the Central Bank of Ukraine from the government: a euphemism with which the IMF
calls on the Kyiv government to renounce legitimate control over its Central
Bank, which is one of the ways in which national sovereignty is exercised,
along with the issuance of money and the management of public debt. On the other
hand, just four months earlier Kristalina Georgieva had launched the Great
Reset together with Klaus Schwab, Prince Charles and UN Secretary-General
António Guterres.
What
had not been possible with previous governments was brought to completion under
the presidency of Zelenskyy, who entered the good graces of the WEF (here)
along with the new governor of the BCU, Kyrylo Shevchenko. Less than a year
later, in order to prove his subjection, Shevchenko wrote an article for the
WEF entitled Central banks are the key to countries’ climate goals and Ukraine
is showing the way (here). Thus the Agenda 2030 is implemented, under
blackmail.
There
are also other Ukrainian companies that have ties to the WEF: the State Savings
Bank of Ukraine (one of the largest financial institutions in Ukraine), the
DTEK Group (an important private investor in the Ukrainian energy sector) and
Ukr Land Farming (an agricultural leader in cultivation). Banks, energy and
food are sectors perfectly in line with the Great Reset and the Fourth
Industrial Revolution theorized by Klaus Schwab.
On
February 4, 2021, the Ukrainian president shut down seven television stations,
including ZIK, Newsone and 112 Ukraine, all guilty of not supporting his
government. As Anna Del Freo writes:
A
harsh condemnation of this liberticidal act has arrived, among others, also
from the European Federation of Journalists and the International Federation of
Journalists, who have asked for the immediate lifting of the veto. The three
broadcasters will no longer be able to broadcast for five years: they employ
about 1500 people, whose jobs are now at risk. There is no real reason why the
three networks should be shut down, except for the arbitrariness of the
Ukrainian political apex, which accuses them of threatening information
security and being under “malign Russian influence.” A strong reaction also
comes from NUJU, the Ukrainian journalists’ union, which speaks of a very heavy
attack on freedom of speech, given that hundreds of journalists are being
deprived of the opportunity to express themselves and hundreds of thousands of
citizens are being deprived of the right to be informed.
As
we can see, what Putin is accused of was actually carried out by Zelenskyy and,
more recently, by the European Union, with the complicity of social media
platforms. Del Freo’s article notes:
“Shutting
down television broadcasters is one of the most extreme forms of restriction of
the freedom of the press,” said EFJ Secretary General Ricardo Gutierrez.
“Nations have an obligation to ensure effective pluralism of information. It is
clear that the presidential veto is not at all in line with international
standards on freedom of expression.”
It
would be interesting to know what statements were made by the European
Federation of Journalists and the International Federation of Journalists after
the blackout of Russia Today and Sputnik in Europe.
Neo-nazi
and extremist movements in Ukraine
A
country that calls for humanitarian aid from the international community to
defend its population from Russian aggression should, in the collective
imagination, stand out for respect for democratic principles and for
legislation that prohibits activities and the spread of propaganda by extremist
ideologies.
Neo-Nazi
movements engaged in military and paramilitary actions operate freely in
Ukraine, often with the official support of public institutions. These include
the following: Stepan Bandera’s Organization of Ukrainian Nationalists (OUN), a
movement with a Nazi, anti-Semitic and racist matrix already active in Chechnya
and which is part of the Right Sector, an association of far-right movements
formed at the time of the Euromaidan coup in 2013/2014; the Ukrainian Insurgent
Army (UPA); the UNA/UNSO, paramilitary wing of the far-right political party
Ukraine National Assembly; the Korchinsky Brotherhood, which offered protection
in Kyiv to ISIS members (here); Misanthropic Vision (MD), a neo-Nazi network spread
across 19 countries that publicly incites terrorism, extremism and hatred
against Christians, Muslims, Jews, Communists, homosexuals, Americans and
people of color (here).
It
should be remembered that the government has given explicit support to these
extremist organizations both by sending the presidential guard to the funerals
of their representatives, as well as by supporting the Azov Battalion, a
paramilitary organization that is officially part of the Ukrainian Army under
the new name of Azov Special Operations Regiment and organized into the
National Guard. The Azov Regiment is financed by the Ukrainian Jewish oligarch
Igor Kolomoisky, the former governor of Dnepropetrovsk, who is also thought to
be the financier of the nationalist militias of Pravyi Sektor, which are
considered responsible for the Odessa massacre. We are talking about the same
Kolomoisky mentioned in the Pandora Papers as a sponsor of President Zelenskyy.
The battalion has relations with several far-right organizations in Europe and
the United States.
Amnesty
International, after a meeting on September 8, 2014 between Secretary General
Salil Shetty and Prime Minister Arseniy Yatsenyuk, called on the Ukrainian
Government to end the abuses and war crimes committed by the volunteer battalions
that operate together with the Kiev Armed Forces. The Ukrainian government has
opened an official investigation into the matter, declaring that no officers or
soldiers of the Azov Battalion appear to be under investigation.
In
March 2015, Ukrainian Interior Minister Arsen Avakov announced that the Azov
Battalion would be one of the first units to be trained by US Army troops, as
part of their Operation Fearless Guard training mission. US training was
discontinued on June 12, 2015, when the US House of Representatives passed an
amendment banning all aid (including weapons and training) to the battalion
because of its neo-Nazi past. The amendment was then revoked under pressure
from the CIA (here and here) and the soldiers of the Azov Battalion were trained
in the United States (here and here): “We have been training these guys for
eight years now. They are really good fighters. That’s where the Agency’s
program could have a serious impact.”
In
2016, an OSCE report [Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe]
found that the Azov Battalion was responsible for the mass killing of
prisoners, the concealment of corpses in mass graves and the systematic use of
physical and psychological torture techniques. Just a few days ago the Deputy
Commander of the Battalion, Vadim Troyan, was appointed Chief of Police of the
Oblast Region by Interior Minister Arsen Avakov.
These
are the “heroes” fighting together with the Ukrainian Army against the Russian
soldiers. And these heroes of the Azov
Battalion, instead of protecting their children, dare to make their own flesh
into meat for slaughter, enlisting boys and girls (here and here), in violation
of the Optional Protocol to the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child
(here), concerning the involvement of minors in armed conflicts: an ad hoc
legal instrument that establishes that no child under 18 is to be forcibly recruited or used directly in
hostilities, either by the armed forces of a state nor by armed groups.
Inevitably,
the lethal weapons provided by the EU, including Draghi’s Italy, with the
support of “anti-fascist” political parties, are destined to be used against
these children.
The
Ukrainian war in the plans of the NWO
The
censorship being imposed against Russian broadcasters is clearly aimed at
preventing the official narrative from being disproven by the facts. But while
the Western media shows images of the video game War Thunder (here), frames
from the movie Star Wars (here), explosions in China (here), videos of military
parades (here), footage from Afghanistan (here), the Rome metro (here) or
images of mobile crematoria (here) by passing them off as real and recent
scenes of the war in Ukraine, reality is ignored because it has already been
decided to provoke a conflict as a weapon of mass distraction that legitimizes
new restrictions of freedoms in Western nations, according to the plans of the
World Economic Forum’s Great Reset and the United Nations’ Agenda 2030.
It
is evident that the Ukrainian people, beyond the issues that diplomacy can
resolve, are victims of the same global coup d’état being carried out by
supranational powers that intend, not peace between nations, but rather the
establishment of the tyranny of the New World Order. Just a few days ago,
Ukrainian parliamentarian Kira Rudik told Fox News, while holding a
kalashnikov: “We know that we are not only fighting for Ukraine, but also for
the New World Order.”
The
human rights violations in Ukraine and the crimes of the neo-Nazi militias
repeatedly denounced by Putin could not find a political solution because they
were planned and fomented by the globalist elite, with the collaboration of the
European Union, NATO and the American deep state, with an anti-Russian tone
intended to make inevitable a war whose goal is to impose, primarily in Europe,
the forced adoption of energy rationing (here),[3] travel restrictions, the
replacement of paper money with electronic money (here and here) and the
adoption of digital ID (here and here). We are not talking about theoretical
projects. These are decisions that are about to be taken concretely at the
European level as well as in individual countries.
Respect
for the Law and Standards
The
intervention in Ukraine by NATO, the United States, and the European Union does
not appear to have any legitimacy. Ukraine is not a member of NATO, and as such
it should not benefit from the assistance of an entity whose purpose is the
defense of its member nations. The same can be said of the European Union,
which just a few days ago invited Zelenskyy to join it. In the meantime,
Ukraine has received $2.5 billion from the United States since 2014 and another
$400 million in 2021 alone (here), plus other funds for a total of $4.6 billion
dollars (here). For his part, Putin has given $15 billion in loans to Ukraine
to save it from bankruptcy. The European Union, for its part, has sent $17
million in funding, in addition to funding sent from various individual
nations. But this assistance has benefitted the Ukrainian population only
minimally.
Furthermore,
by intervening in the war in Ukraine in the name of the European Union,
European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen is violating articles 9, 11,
and 12 of the Treaty of Lisbon. The competence of the European Union in this
area belongs to the European Council and the High Representative. In no case
does it belong to the Commission President. In what capacity does President von
der Leyen presume to act as if she were the head of the European Union,
usurping a role that does not belong to her? Why does no one intervene,
especially considering the danger to which European citizens are being exposed
due to the possibility of Russian retaliation?
Furthermore,
in many cases the constitutions of the nations that are today sending support
and weapons to Ukraine do not provide for the possibility of entering into a
conflict. For example, article 11 of the Italian Constitution states: “Italy
repudiates war as an instrument of offense for the liberty of other peoples and
as a means of resolving international controversies.” Sending weapons and
soldiers to a nation that is not a part of either NATO or the European Union
constitutes a de facto declaration of war on the nation belligerent with it (in
this case, Russia), and should therefore require the prior deliberation of
declaring war, as is foreseen by article 78 of the Italian Constitution: “The
Chambers [of Parliament] deliberate on the state of war and confer the
necessary powers on the government.” It does not appear that to date the
Chambers have been called upon to express themselves in this sense, or that the
President of the Republic has intervened to demand compliance with the
constitutional provision. Prime Minister Draghi, appointed by the globalist
cabal for the destruction of Italy and its definitive enslavement to
supranational powers, is one of the many Heads of national governments who
considers the will of the citizens as an annoying obstacle to the execution of
the agenda of the World Economic Forum. After two years of systematic
violations of fundamental rights and of the Constitution, it is difficult to
believe that he will want to place the interests of the Italian nation ahead of
the interests of those who have placed him in power. On the contrary: the more
disastrous are the effects of the sanctions adopted by his government, the more
he can consider himself appreciated by those who have given him power. The coup
perpetrated by means of the psychopandemic emergency proceeds today with new
unfortunate decisions, ratified by a Parliament without a spine.
It
is also a violation of article 288 of the Italian Penal Code to permit Italian
citizens – and even members of the majority in the Government and political
leaders – to respond to the appeal of the Ukrainian Ambassador for enrollment
in the foreign legion: “Anyone in the territory of [Italy] who without
government approval enlists or arms citizens to serve [in the military] in
favor of a foreign nation, is to be punished with imprisonment for a period of
4 to 15 years.” No magistrate, at least for the time being, has intervened to
punish those responsible for this crime.
Another
violation is found in the activity of transferring children from Ukraine to
Italy (and presumably also to other nations) who have been obtained via
surrogate motherhood, ordered by Italian couples in violation of Law 40/2004,
without any penalty being imposed on those guilty of this crime, as well as
their accomplices.
It
should also be remembered that the utterances of members of the government or
of political leaders with regard to the Russian Federation and its President,
along with the sanctions that have been adopted against Russia and the repeated
instances of arbitrary discrimination against Russian citizens, companies,
artists, and sports teams for the sole fact of being Russian, are not only
provocations that ought to be avoided in order to allow for a serene and
peaceful settlement of the Ukraine crisis, but also place the safety of Italian
citizens in very serious danger (as well as the safety of citizens of other
nations who are adopting a similar stance toward Russia). The reason for such
rash temerity is incomprehensible, unless there is an intentional desire to
trigger reactions from the opposing party.
The
Russian-Ukrainian conflict is a very dangerous trap that has been set against
Ukraine, Russia, and the nations of Europe.
Ukraine
is the latest victim of accomplished executioners
The
Russian-Ukrainian crisis did not suddenly erupt a month ago. It has been
prepared and fomented for a long time, certainly beginning with the 2014 white
coup that was desired by the American deep state in an anti-Russian key. This
is demonstrated, among other incontestable facts, by the training of the Azov
Battalion by the CIA “to kill Russians” (here), with the CIA forcing the
revocation of the amendment banning aid to the battalion made by Congress in
2015. The interventions made by Joe and Hunter Biden have gone in the same
direction. Thus there is evidence of long-term premeditation, consistent with
NATO’s relentless expansion towards the East. The Color Revolution of
Euromaidan, as well as the establishment of a pro-NATO government composed of
homines novitrained by the World Economic Forum and George Soros, was intended
to create the conditions for the subordination of Ukraine to the NATO bloc,
removing it from the influence of the Russian Federation. To this end, the
subversive action of the Hungarian philanthropist’s NGOs, supported by media
propaganda, has kept silent about the crimes of neo-Nazi paramilitary
organizations, financed by the same people who sponsor Zelenskyy.
But
if the brainwashing carried out by the mainstream media in Western nations has
succeeded in conveying a completely distorted narrative of reality, the same
cannot be said for Ukraine, where the population is well aware of the
corruption of the political class in power as well as of its remoteness from
the real problems of the Ukrainian nation. We in the West believe that the
“oligarchs” are only in Russia, while the reality is that they are present
above all throughout the entire galaxy of nations that formerly composed the
Soviet Union, where they can accumulate wealth and power simply by placing
themselves at the disposition of foreign “philanthropists” and multinational
corporations. It matters little if their offshore accounts are the primary
cause of the poverty of the citizens of these nations, the backwardness of the
health care system, the excessive power of the bureaucracy, the almost total
absence of public services, foreign control of strategic companies, and the
progressive loss of sovereignty and national identity: the important thing is
to “make money” and be immortalized along with political personalities,
bankers, arms dealers, and those who starve the people. And then to come to the
fashionable resorts of Versilia or the Amalfi Coast to flaunt their yachts and
platinum cards to the waiter from Odessa or the cleaning lady from Kyiv who
send their paltry wages to their relatives back home. These Ukrainian
billionaires wearing kippahs are those who are selling out Ukraine to the
corrupted and corrupting West, trading their own well-being for the enslavement
of their compatriots to the usurers who are taking over the world, using the
same ruthless and immoral systems everywhere. In the past they cut the salaries
of workers in Athens and Thessaloniki; today they have simply enlarged their
horizons to the whole of Europe, where the population still looks on
incredulously while first a health dictatorship and then an environmental
dictatorship is being imposed.
On
the other hand, without the pretext of a war, how would they have been able to
justify the soaring price of gas and fuels, forcing the process of an
“ecological” transition imposed from on high in order to control the
impoverished masses? How could they have made the peoples of the Western world
swallow the establishment of the tyranny of the New World Order, when the
pandemic farce was unraveling and bringing to light crimes against humanity
committed by BigPharma?
And
while the EU and heads of government blame Russia for the impending disaster,
the Western elites demonstrate that they even want to destroy agriculture, in
order to apply the horrors of the Holodomor on a global scale (here). On the
other hand, in many nations (including Italy) the privatization of waterways is
being theorized – and water is an inalienable public good – for the advantage
of multinationals and with the aim of controlling and limiting agriculture
activities. The pro-NATO government of Kyiv did not behave much differently:
for eight years the Crimea was deprived of water from the Dnieper River in
order to prevent the irrigation of the fields and starve the people. Today, in
light of the sanctions being imposed on Russia and the huge reduction of grain
supplies, we can understand Bill Gates’ enormous investments in agriculture
(here), following the same ruthless profit-making logic already experienced
with the vaccine campaign.
The
Ukrainian people, regardless of what ethnic group they may belong to, are
merely the latest unwitting hostages of the supranational totalitarian regime
that brought the national economies of the entire world to their knees through
the COVID deception, after publicly theorizing about the need to decimate the
world population and transform the survivors into chronically ill patients who
have irreparably compromised their immune systems.
The
Ukrainian people should think hard about calling upon the intervention of NATO
or the EU, provided that it is really the Ukrainian people who do it and not
rather their corrupt rulers aided by racist mercenaries and neo-Nazi groups in
the pay of hierarchs. Because while they are promised freedom from the invader
– with whom they share the common religious and cultural heritage of having
once been part of Great Russia – in reality what is cynically being prepared is
their definitive cancellation, their enslavement to the Great Reset that
foresees everything except the protection of their identity, their sovereignty,
and their borders.
Let
the Ukrainian people look at what has happened to the nations of the European
Union: the mirage of prosperity and security is demolished by the contemplation
of the rubble left by the Euro and the lobbies of Brussels. Nations invaded by
illegal immigrants who feed crime and prostitution; destroyed in their social
fabric by politically correct ideologies; knowingly brought to bankruptcy by
reckless economic and fiscal policies; led towards poverty by the cancellation
of labor and social security protections; deprived of a future by the
destruction of the family and the moral and intellectual corruption of the new
generations.
What
were once prosperous and independent nations, diverse in their respective
ethnic, linguistic, cultural, and religious specificities, have now been
transformed into a shapeless mass of people without ideals, without hopes,
without faith, without even the strength to react against the abuses and crimes
of those who govern them. A mass of corporate customers, slaves of the system
of detailed control imposed by the pandemic farce, even in the face of evidence
of the fraud. A mass of persons without individual identity, marked with QR
codes like animals on an intensive farm, like products of a huge shopping
center. If this has been the result of the renunciation of national sovereignty
for all the nations – every single one, without exception! – that have
entrusted themselves to the colossal scam of the European Union, why would
Ukraine be any different?
Is
this what your fathers wanted, what they hoped for, what they desired, when
they received Baptism along with Vladimir the Great on the banks of the
Dnieper?
If
there is a positive aspect that each of us can recognize in this crisis, it is
that it has revealed the horror of the globalist tyranny, its ruthless
cynicism, its capacity to destroy and annihilate everything it touches. It is
not the Ukrainians who ought to enter the European Union or NATO, it is rather
the other nations who ought to finally be jolted by pride and courage to leave
them, shaking off this detestable yoke and rediscovering their own
independence, sovereignty, identity, and faith. Their own souls.
To
be clear: the New Order is not an inescapable destiny, and it can be subverted
and denounced, if only the peoples of the world realize that they have been
deceived and swindled by an oligarchy of clearly identifiable criminals, who
one day will have to answer for those sanctions and those blocks of funds that
today they apply with impunity to anyone who does not bend the knee before
them.
An
appeal to the Third Rome
For
Russia too, this conflict is a trap. This is because it would fulfill the dream
of the American deep state to definitively oust Russia from the European
context in its commercial and cultural relations, pushing it into the arms of
China, perhaps with the hope that the dictatorship in Beijing can persuade the
Russians to accept the system of social credit and other aspects of the Great
Reset that thus far Russia has been able to avoid, at least in part.
It
is a trap, not because Russia is wrong in wanting to “denazify” Ukraine of its
extremist groups and guarantee protection to Russian-speaking Ukrainians, but
because it is precisely these reasons – theoretically tenable – that were
created specifically to provoke it and induce it to invade Ukraine, in such a
way as to provoke the NATO reaction that has been prepared for some time by the
deep state and the globalist elite. The casus belli was deliberately planned by
the real perpetrators of the conflict, knowing that it would obtain exactly
that response from Putin. And it is up to Putin, regardless of whether he is
right, not to fall into the trap, and to instead turn the tables, offering
Ukraine the conditions of an honorable peace without continuing the conflict.
Indeed, the more Putin believes he is right, the more he needs to demonstrate
the greatness of his nation and his love for his people by not giving into
provocations.
Permit
me to repeat the words of the Prophet Isaiah: Dissolve colligationes
impietatis, solve fasciculos deprimentes, dimitte eos qui confracti sunt
liberos, et omne onus dirumpe; frange esurienti panem tuum, et egenos vagosque
induc in domum tuam; cum videris nudum, operi eum, et carnem tuam ne despexeris.
Tunc erumpet quasi mane lumen tuum; et sanitas tua citius orietur, et anteibit
faciem tuam justitia tua, et gloria Domini colliget te.
Loose
the bands of wickedness, undo the bundles that oppress, let those who are
broken go free, and break asunder every burden. Share your bread with the
hungry, welcome into your house the afflicted and homeless; when you see a
naked man, clothe him, and do not turn your back on your own flesh. Then your
light will arise like the dawn, and your wound will quickly be healed. Your
justice shall go before you, the glory of the Lord will closely follow you. (Is
58:6-8).
The
world crisis with which the dissolution of traditional society is being
prepared has also involved the Catholic Church, whose hierarchy is held hostage
by apostates who are courtiers of power.[4] There was a time in which popes and
prelates confronted kings without concern for human respect, because they knew
they spoke with the voice of Jesus Christ, the King of kings. The Rome of the
Caesars and popes is now deserted and silent, just as for centuries the Second
Rome of Constantinople has also been silent. Perhaps Providence has ordained
that Moscow, the Third Rome, will today in the sight of the world take on the
role of κατέχον (2 Thess 2:6-7), of eschatological obstacle to the Antichrist.
If the errors of Communism were spread by the Soviet Union, even to the point
of imposing themselves within the Church, Russia and Ukraine can today have an
epochal role in the restoration of Christian civilization, contributing to
bringing the world a period of peace from which the Church too will rise again
purified and renewed in her ministers.
The
United States of America and the European nations should not marginalize
Russia, but rather form an alliance with her, not only for the restoration of
trade for the prosperity of all, but in view of the reconstruction of a
Christian civilization, which alone can save the world from the globalist
techno-health transhuman monster.
Final
Considerations
There
is great concern that the destinies of the peoples of the world is in the hands
of an elite that is not accountable to anyone for its decisions, that does not
recognize any authority above itself, and that in order to pursue its own
interests does not hesitate to jeopardize security, the economy, and the very
lives of billions of people, with the complicity of politicians in their
service and the mainstream media. The falsification of facts, the grotesque
adulterations of reality, and the partisanship with which the news is spread
stand alongside the censorship of dissenting voices and leads to forms of
ethnic persecution against Russian citizens, who are discriminated against
precisely in the countries that say they are democratic and respectful of
fundamental rights.
I
earnestly hope that my appeal for the establishment of an Anti-Globalist
Alliance that unites the peoples of the world in opposition against the tyranny
of the New World Order will be accepted by those who have at heart the common
good, peace between nations, concord among all peoples, freedom for all
citizens and the future of the new generations. And even before that, may my
words – along with those of many intellectually honest people – contribute to
bringing to light the complicity and corruption of those who use lies and fraud
to justify their crimes, even in these moments of great apprehension about the
war in Ukraine.
May
the strong listen to us, so as not to become weak in injustice. May the
powerful listen to us, if they want their power not to be destruction but
support for the peoples and protection for tranquility in order and work (Pius
XII, Radio message to Heads of State and Peoples of the World in Imminent
Danger of War, August 24, 1939).
May
Holy Lent lead all Christians to ask pardon from the Divine Majesty for the
sins of those who trample His Holy Law. May penance and fasting move the Lord
God to mercy, while we repeat the words of the Prophet Joel: Parce, Domine:
parce populo tuo; et ne des hæreditatem tuam in opprobrium, ut dominentur eis
nationes. Forgive your people, Lord, and do not expose your inheritance to
reproach, to the derision of the nations (Jl 2:17).
+
Carlo Maria Viganò, Archbishop,
Former
Apostolic Nuncio to the United States of America
March
6, 2022
First
Sunday of Lent
[1]
In 2011, Kolomoisky was one of the co-founders of the Jewish European
Parliament, along with billionaire Vadim Rabinovich. Cf. https://ejp.eu/. Note
that Rabinovich is a member of the Opposition Platform – For Life, the
Ukrainian pro-Russian political party whose leader Viktor Medvedcuk was
arrested by Zelenskyy.
[2]
According to Russian politician Viktor Vladislavovich Zubarev, a member of the
State Duma, Zelenskyy is also said to have $1.2 billion deposited at Dresdner
Bank in Costa Rica and a villa in Miami purchased for $34 million (here). For a
more comprehensive picture, see the investigation by Slidstvo-info, an
independent Ukrainian agency of investigative journalism (here).
[3]
It should be noted that the Italian Minister of Ecological Transition, Roberto
Cingolani, decided a few days ago to sell a share of oil stocks to Ukraine “as
a concrete aid also on the energy front,” exactly as during the pandemic he
gave away millions of masks to China, only to then buy them back from Beijing
shortly thereafter (here).
[4]
In its March 6 issue, Famiglia Cristiana has a headline, commenting on an
article by the founder of the Sant’Egidio Community, Andrea Riccardi: “Let’s
stop the war and build a new world order” (here).
