When clergy stand up for the admittance of divorced and civilly remarried Catholics to Holy Communion, they in fact solemnize their adultery and their sin against the Sixth Commandment. They give to such faithful the message that their divorce and the continuous violation of their sacramental bonds can become ultimately a positive reality. In other words, such clergy are liars.
No Catholic who still takes seriously his baptismal vows should allow himself to be intimidated by these new sophistic teachers of fornication and adultery, even though — sad to say — these teachers hold the office of a bishop or cardinal.
We well remember this quote originally written by Richard Gaillardetz and used repeatedly in speeches and on videos by Thomas Rosica without attribution to the writer:
"Doctrine changes when pastoral contexts shift and new insights emerge such that particularly doctrinal formulations no longer mediate the saving message of God's transforming love?" Does he mean that "Doctrine changes when the Church has leaders and teachers who are not afraid to take note of new contexts and emerging insights?" Or does he mean that, "It changes when the Church has pastors who do what Francis has been insisting: leave the securities of your chanceries, of your rectories, of your safe places, of your episcopal residences go set aside the small minded rules that often keep you locked up and shielded from the world?"
Cardinal Burke and Bishop Schneider have been ceaseless in standing up for the truth of the Catholic faith in the face of those who would attempt to undermine the Church of Our Lord Jesus Christ with flippant comments such as "It is my church."
Where are the rest?
5 comments:
Jesus may have been thinking about the present time when He said:
"Nevertheless, when the Son of Man comes, will he find faith on earth?”
Luke: 18:8
Matthew 16:
" 1. AND there came to him the Pharisees and Sadduccees tempting: and they asked him to shew them a sign from heaven. 2. But he answered and said to them: When it is evening, you say, It will be fair weather, for the sky is red. 3. And in the morning: To day there will be a storm, for the sky is red and lowering. You know then how to discern the face of the sky: and can you not know the signs of the times? 4. A wicked and adulterous generation seeketh after a sign: and a sign shall not be given it, but the sign of Jonas the prophet. And he left them, and went away."
The skies of our times are very red and lowering for those who have eyes to see.
Exactly Vox: "WHERE ARE THE REST"? Where are the rest to stand in bold defiance to these evil clerics and PROCLAIM LOUDLY, BOLDLY, PUBLICLY AND WITHOUT HESITATION the truth of Christ's Church??!! As a matter of fact I think a lot of us are still waiting for at least a small group if nothing else, to stand in defiance to the strange proclamations of this Pontiff that spouts 'inarticulate non Catholic insanity' almost daily in defiance of Catholicism. Who are these 'Fundamentalists' in the Church that he must fight against for doing 'so much harm to the Church'???!!! 'So many of them' as he says. Why good Bishops keep silent in the face of blatant heresy is doing as much harm to the Church as the heresy being shouted from the roof tops.
Most excellent Bishop, I deeply appreciate your vocal expression against what is happening BUT you are still clipping at the periphery. The evil rot is already in place when the Pope allowed speedy annulments and already added to the abuses and abusive processes. Hence the question that needs to be asked, in the present dispensation: "Can every person who has got annulment validly receive communion?
@ TLM
If we really wanted answers, we would accept them, for we have them. It takes but a little time and effort to see via the internet Bergoglio's beliefs and activities prior to papal election. It is for these beliefs and activities that Masons were travelling around and advocating for him. There is a reason why the Church used to reject masonry, and there is a reason why masonry was celebrating Bergoglio's election.
These people, like the pope, consider religious indifferentism a necessary step in the evolution of humanity. Hence the rejection of absolutes, doctrines, of the intellect, hence the emotionalism and demagoguery. Hence the Lucifer Trust at the UN.
When masons gather for their charitable projects, they do not ask for the absolute Truth, they do not discuss God (it is forbidden, for it is a cause for disagreement). They discuss humanitarian causes, divorced from Truth. Essentially they are no different from Stalin or Mao, yet if one told them so, the busy bodies and do-gooders without Truth and God would feel hurt.
Masons occupying higher levels of the masonic structure worship Lucifer, as we all know, and use the lower levels as a front organization of useful idiots. What level is the pope? I do not know.
The things that all humans have in-common are eating and the drive to procreate (so often perverted these days, with the help of the masonic academia and media). Yet we split into camps as soon as we begin to ask for the absolute Truth. Language, the Logos, the Truth, is an aspect of divinity and of humanity, not part of animal existence. This pope sees us as animals, who need to eat and who have an instinct to procreate. He insists on separation of love from the most human concerns, he despises as elitist those asking for Truth. For him love and truth are in meals and sex. It is the common denominator masons have always wanted for humanity, essentially a herd of useless eaters. Meals and sex are the focus of useful idiots preoccupied with charitable works (that always include advocacy for "a woman's right to choose"). How can some of them call themselves Christians, if Christ told us to seek the Kingdom of Heaven first, to proclaim His Name openly and boldly?
This pope and his masons in priestly garments avoid Jesus' name, while they like to eat well, compromise truth with everyone - for the sake of peace, and are eager to celebrate perverted sex.
Post a Comment