“A time is coming when men will go mad, and when they see someone who is not mad, they will attack him, saying, 'You are mad; you are not like us.” ― St. Antony the Great
Yes yes... Adam and Eve also were accompanied by the Serpent to discern God's command not to eat the fruit if a certain tree. But that was all in the past several days ago... So a new blossoming of understanding was necessary and Eve saw that the merciful God could never have really said they would "die." So she did not change the words if God, but discerned a new 'good' understanding. The word of the Lord according to Bergolio.
Listen to this old blasphemer. You would think that the thought of death would make this old reprobate blush with shame and beg the Lord's forgiveness for his outrages and blasphemies. No, he's the proverbial dog returning to its vomit. God have mercy on us!
It's a shame that God doesn't give them the grace to discern what fools they are making of themselves in the eyes of the world. After 2,000 years they have suddenly decided the Word of God needs 'their' discernment & we, the dopey Traditional Catholics, must follow them as they are the only ones capable of interpreting what God REALLY was saying & we must comply. They are the great prophets of our age - well, False Prophets, but don't let that bother you. St. Luther awaits!
Now after 2000 years we finally learn from Pope Francis and the new Jesuit General that Jesus didn't really mean what he said. How these two came to know this is an open question. Some may think it was the influence of higher powers that brought about this new perception. This is no doubt true but these higher powers do reside in the heavenly realm.
Pretty soon these "experts" will discern the real presence and the resurrection right out of existence AND they'll call those who believe these "fairy tales" as ignorant.
GMUA........ don't know what you mean by "he's not a real priest..." of course Arturo Sosa is a real priest because he was ordained. If you mean a holy priest - well, that's another matter. We all need to remember that Judas Iscariot WAS an apostle. ....just not a holy one.
Hey, maybe all that stuff about how we laymen cannot judge the Pope is just an opinionated ideal too that might be way out of date, a relic from that pre VII time! Same for all those things about respecting one's superiors. So what do you guys think? Will we see a new blossoming of understanding about those ideals too? Someone should hold a conference!
Also Box, our friend Mr. Voris has some strong questions for our other friend Rosica. https://youtu.be/pdTB54Rj2MI
It's too bad Mr. Voris doesn't think to forward the same questions to Rosica's boss too...
Jesus words do not have an absolute value!!??? What then are we to make of this Jesuit's word's or Pope Bergoglio's for that matter? Are they not also to be interpreted in their "historical context"? Is not Arturo Sosa, SJ a child of the twentieth century? The most evil and perverse century in all of recorded human history? A century of horrible violence and ideological extremism? I think we all know how to "interpret" Sosa's words in their proper historical context.
I wondered about the fate of the seed Bergoglio planted in his Sunday Angelus from Feb. 12, 2017. http://aleteia.org/2017/02/12/pope-francis-insulting-is-a-kind-of-killing/
He put the words of Jesus on how even lustful looking at a woman constitutes adultery, into a new context, by claiming that in those days wives were treated by men as property, and by replacing the words "looking lustfully" with "looking with a possessing spirit". In addition, where Jesus forbids taking a new wife unless one's wife 'committed adultery', Bergoglio claims he forbade taking another wife unless the current 'marriage was invalid'.
That wicked wicked Angelus was shockingly bold, since it also included the much quoted: "Let your 'Yes' mean 'Yes' and your 'No' mean 'No'.
I was surprised that no one was taking about Bergoglio's lies aka new interpretations of Jesus' words about divorce - at a time of the dubia, too! I just new this was only a beginning of the attack on the unequivocal words of Jesus himself, and that more would be coming soon.
The new teaching is this: Jesus forbid men from being greedy, from wanting to increase their possessions by taking new wives. Women are not objects to be possessed. He said: Do not even look at women with a possessing spirit.
Greed - bad. Love - good.
To look at women with love (for Bergoglian sodomites lust equals love) - well, these are realities of life. Sometimes the love is not there any more, it is hard to stay married, we are told by our shepherds. New realities, new contexts call for new solutions, Most Catholic marriages are invalid anyway, let's make annulments quick, and let's move forward!
In the begining was the Word ,and the Word was with God,and the Word was God.These people are suffering from intellectual Pride ,they want to be all things to all people ,and change Scripture accordingly.
The church is collapsing almost as fast as the institution you head, Christendom is a shadow of what it once was, and muzzies are streaming through the front gate, while all you seem to care about is rear entries. The 60s and 70s, predicated on the previous half-century of collectivist veillities, are over. Que precioso eres.
Is the Jesus they refer to Jesus Christ ,the Incarnate Word of God ,because lately they seem to be dropping his full title ,they also seem to be over looking the fact that of the men who wrote the Gospels ,two were eye witness ,one lived and cared for the Mother of Christ and all were inspired by the Holy Spirit.Looks like the new motto of the Jesuits is "Lets make a Mess"
21 comments:
These men are not real priests.
The fact that this man remains as Jesuit Superior tells us even more about the heresies of his superiors than even his.
Yes yes... Adam and Eve also were accompanied by the Serpent to discern God's command not to eat the fruit if a certain tree. But that was all in the past several days ago... So a new blossoming of understanding was necessary and Eve saw that the merciful God could never have really said they would "die." So she did not change the words if God, but discerned a new 'good' understanding. The word of the Lord according to Bergolio.
Listen to this old blasphemer. You would think that the thought of death would make this old reprobate blush with shame and beg the Lord's forgiveness for his outrages and blasphemies. No, he's the proverbial dog returning to its vomit. God have mercy on us!
With perhaps a few individual exceptions, the Jesuits are a theologically and spiritually bankrupt group.
It's a shame that God doesn't give them the grace to discern what fools they are making of themselves in the eyes of the world. After 2,000 years they have suddenly decided the Word of God needs 'their' discernment & we, the dopey Traditional Catholics, must follow them as they are the only ones capable of interpreting what God REALLY was saying & we must comply. They are the great prophets of our age - well, False Prophets, but don't let that bother you. St. Luther awaits!
Next on the list for contemporary blossomings of new understanding:
"This is My Body. This is My Blood."
"You are Peter and upon this rock I will build My Church."
"Thou shalt not kill."
"I am the Lord thy God. You shalt have no other gods before Me."
Now after 2000 years we finally learn from Pope Francis and the new Jesuit General that Jesus didn't really mean what he said. How these two came to know this is an open question. Some may think it was the influence of higher powers that brought about this new perception. This is no doubt true but these higher powers do reside in the heavenly realm.
Pretty soon these "experts" will discern the real presence and the resurrection right out of existence AND they'll call those who believe these "fairy tales" as ignorant.
According to the "prophet" Dan.....
And God gave Moses the Ten Suggestions !
GMUA........ don't know what you mean by "he's not a real priest..." of course Arturo Sosa is a real priest because he was ordained. If you mean a holy priest - well, that's another matter. We all need to remember that Judas Iscariot WAS an apostle. ....just not a holy one.
"But if we, or an angel from heaven, preach to you another Gospel beside the one we have preached to you, let him be anathema." Gal 1:8
Hey, maybe all that stuff about how we laymen cannot judge the Pope is just an opinionated ideal too that might be way out of date, a relic from that pre VII time! Same for all those things about respecting one's superiors. So what do you guys think? Will we see a new blossoming of understanding about those ideals too? Someone should hold a conference!
Also Box, our friend Mr. Voris has some strong questions for our other friend Rosica.
https://youtu.be/pdTB54Rj2MI
It's too bad Mr. Voris doesn't think to forward the same questions to Rosica's boss too...
Correction: This is no doubt true but these higher powers do NOT reside in the heavenly realm.
Jesus words do not have an absolute value!!??? What then are we to make of this Jesuit's word's or Pope Bergoglio's for that matter? Are they not also to be interpreted in their "historical context"? Is not Arturo Sosa, SJ a child of the twentieth century? The most evil and perverse century in all of recorded human history? A century of horrible violence and ideological extremism? I think we all know how to "interpret" Sosa's words in their proper historical context.
I wondered about the fate of the seed Bergoglio planted in his Sunday Angelus from Feb. 12, 2017.
http://aleteia.org/2017/02/12/pope-francis-insulting-is-a-kind-of-killing/
He put the words of Jesus on how even lustful looking at a woman constitutes adultery, into a new context, by claiming that in those days wives were treated by men as property, and by replacing the words "looking lustfully" with "looking with a possessing spirit".
In addition, where Jesus forbids taking a new wife unless one's wife 'committed adultery', Bergoglio claims he forbade taking another wife unless the current 'marriage was invalid'.
That wicked wicked Angelus was shockingly bold, since it also included the much quoted: "Let your 'Yes' mean 'Yes' and your 'No' mean 'No'.
I was surprised that no one was taking about Bergoglio's lies aka new interpretations of Jesus' words about divorce - at a time of the dubia, too!
I just new this was only a beginning of the attack on the unequivocal words of Jesus himself, and that more would be coming soon.
The new teaching is this: Jesus forbid men from being greedy, from wanting to increase their possessions by taking new wives. Women are not objects to be possessed. He said: Do not even look at women with a possessing spirit.
Greed - bad.
Love - good.
To look at women with love (for Bergoglian sodomites lust equals love) - well, these are realities of life. Sometimes the love is not there any more, it is hard to stay married, we are told by our shepherds. New realities, new contexts call for new solutions, Most Catholic marriages are invalid anyway, let's make annulments quick, and let's move forward!
In the begining was the Word ,and the Word was with God,and the Word was God.These people are suffering from intellectual Pride ,they want to be all things to all people ,and change Scripture accordingly.
So the 'servant' is now greater than the Master?
Fr. SoSo,
The church is collapsing almost as fast as the institution you head, Christendom is a shadow of what it once was, and muzzies are streaming through the front gate, while all you seem to care about is rear entries. The 60s and 70s, predicated on the previous half-century of collectivist veillities, are over. Que precioso eres.
Is the Jesus they refer to Jesus Christ ,the Incarnate Word of God ,because lately they seem to be dropping his full title ,they also seem to be over looking the fact that of the men who wrote the Gospels ,two were eye witness ,one lived and cared for the Mother of Christ and all were inspired by the Holy Spirit.Looks like the new motto of the Jesuits is "Lets make a Mess"
Otro herético jesuita que tampoco cree en el demonio.
Post a Comment