Friday, 25 November 2016

Pope Bergoglio corrected - Two forms of one Roman Rite does not equate with "exception!"

Pope's are not correct every time they spew happy water from their mouth or pass frankincense. They are not infallible on everything they say. This papolatry has done enormous damage to the Church,

I was personally insulted when the Bishop of Rome made negative references towards the traditional Latin Mass and those who attend it. I find him depressing to the point of nausea. His insults and arrogance is unbefitting of the Vicar of Christ and Bishop of Rome. 

What kind of Pope insults Catholics as this man?

Image result for padre pio mass
St. Pio of Pietrelcina being "rigid' and "hiding something"

Now, none other than the great liturgist, Nicola Bux, throws a polite challenge:

FQ: Don Nicola, is the traditional Roman rite an exception?
Nicola Bux: That's  not what  the Motu Proprio by Pope Benedict XVI says. Rather, one reads explicitly that the two rites have the same dignity. This is what the Pope writes, not me. Therefore, we can not say with the document at hand, that it is an exception, unless one wants to come to a conclusion which is directed against the pope's document.
Read the rest at:


Ana Milan said...

The Motu Propio by Benedict XVI was never treated as an equal Rite alongside the Novus Ordo as he never mandated it to be. It is thus not generally celebrated as NO Bishops have fully embraced the new liturgy & seminarians aren't taught the Old Rite. It is nigh impossible to access the EF or TLM in Europe for this reason. This needs to be corrected as the present generation of Catholics are ignorant of the old form which stood for over a thousand years. It shouldn't be lost & more should be done to ensure that it isn't.

JayJay said...

Regardless of who said the two rites have the same dignity, they are wrong. The Roman Rite of the Catholic Church (ie the traditional Latin Mass) is venerable, lost in the depth of history. The N.O. IS, as the august +Marcel Lefebvre called it, a bastard rite. The sooner the NO is thrown on the Vatican II barge trash heap, the better.

Anonymous said...

My thoughts exactly, JayJay. The NOM is a concoction to please Protestants etc.

Peter Lamb said...

A Response to “Bishop” Athanasius Schneider’s Claims against Pope Liberius:

Eirene said...

Good point Ana! But HOW is the present generation of Catholics (and some generations before these, given that a generation is 20 years!)going to be taught the TLM when even the majority of priests don't have a clue and the majority of bishops refuse (illegally I might add) to allow the TLM to be prayed in their dioceses! Sadly, here in Queensland, the Advent Message from the Archbishop
of Brisbane was that we should all get on board with a NEW outlook and NEW structures - you all know the rest! Actually, all this rubbish about giving Holy Communion to those deemed unworthy by the Church is a Red Herring. What Francis and his mob wants is for us all to say Sin does not exist. Once he/they have everyone singing from that song sheet, the game is over and let the Dies Irae begin! You first, Francis . . .

Anonymous said...

Dear Ana,

LB236 posted this on the Remnant website. I thought you might find it helpful:

According to the FSSP apostolate in Fribourg, Switzerland, Bishop Schneider will also celebrate a Pontifical Mass at the Basilique de Norte-Dame on December 8, the Feast of Our Lady's Immaculate Conception. will stream the Mass live at 10:00 a.m. CET (4:00 a.m. EST). For those who cannot be awake at 4:00 a.m. (or earlier) in the U.S., typically posts the recorded Mass later that day for streaming on demand for a 24-hour period.

In Christ the King,


Eirene said...

PS - BEAUTIFUL Black and White Pic of what is the REAL DEAL in Catholicism! Which terrifies Francis and his fellow ghouls!