You can bet that it was all over Rome, that which was discussed, before those thugs, minions and hangers at the Vatican settled down for a rub down at one of Rome's more particular establishments with their gaystapo boytoys.because they sure weren't praying their Office or doing a Holy Hour! Why, you ask? Because if they did these things, they would not do what they do.
Courtesy of LifeSiteNews, here are the key quotes:
“When Christ preached 2,000 years ago, the culture and reigning spirit were radically opposed to Him. Concretely religious syncretism ruled, also Gnosticism among the intelligent leaders, as well as permissibilism among the masses — especially regarding the institution of matrimony. […] The sole purpose of the Son of God was to reveal the truth to the world.”
“The formulation of dubia, as the Cardinals here have expressed in their own terms, has been a common practice in the Church,” he explained. “We need to be able to ask questions openly without being afraid of repressions.”
“The reaction to the dubia is a proof of the climate in which we actually live in the Church right now,” Bishop Schneider said. “We live in a climate of threats and of denial of dialogue towards a specific group.”
“dialogue seems to be accepted only if you think like everyone else - that is practically like a regime.”
+Schneider brought up his experience in Russia, where he was born in the time of the Soviet Union. His parents were sent by Stalin to work camps, or “Gulags,” after the Second World War. “If you didn’t follow the line of the party, or you questioned it, you couldn’t even ask. That is for me a very clear parallel to what is happening now in the reactions to the dubia — questions — of the Cardinals.”
“This is a very sad experience especially since everybody is speaking about a ‘dialogue of culture’ after the Second Vatican Council. While bishops openly teach heresies and nothing happens to them, that is truly a grave injustice and very sad,” Bishop Schneider added.
Cardinal Burke is quoted:
Cardinal Burke has said a “formal correction” might be in order to resolve the situation of uncertainty. “In the language of moral theology, fraternal correction is an act of love — if it is given in obedience and with reason,” Schneider commented. “We have to return to this familiar way of dealing with it.”
As I wrote yesterday, they are "mad" in the sense of angry and deranged that we will not stop exposing the lies and manipulations that began at the first Synod, continued into the second and continue today.
The deal breaker for these Cardinals, in my view. was when Bergoglio confirmed the heretical statement by the Bishops of Buenos Aires compounded by those of the Vicar of Rome.
Bergoglio cannot hide from this. He must answer the dubia which will either nullify his attempts to change Divine Law on Holy Communion or expose himself as a heretic.
That's it friends, there's just no other way around it.
Make a mess, indeed.
12 comments:
Being Modernists they are indeed akin to the Soviets & Gestapo. Modernism embraces all heresies inc. Marxism & Freemasonry and in this case is a global crisis. PF is a political appointment encompassing all of these heresies & in no way can be described as Catholic. The men he has appointed to high positions in the CC are also cut from the same cloth. It is imperative for the correction to be made so that no escape route is given to PF. This is the time for action & fence sitters will have to make up their minds once & for all as to whom they owe their allegiance to - Christ or PF?
Sure Bergolio can "hide." Nothing whatsoever "has to be faced." This is the new Church, it's arrived, heretical or not. No one hears a clock ticking except a few trads. Besides, Bergolio sets the clock, and the bishops keep the time. We are not dealing with amateurs, folks. These changes were in motion before many of us were born.
Soon the p*pe will be asked about this during one of his in-flight press conferences.... I can hardly wait!
Bergoglians caricature faithful Bishops - The Holy Eucharist is not a prize for good behaviour!
They would like all the believe that denying the Holy Eucharist to those persisting in sin is an arrogant statement about God's mercy. In reality, following the teaching of Jesus Christ, insisting on the insolubility of marriage, and denying the Holy Eucharist to adulterers, is not a denial of God's mercy.
On the contrary, it is an act of love and pastoral responsibility for the flock.
Bergoglians, who for the most part do not seem to believe in the real presence (I am quite sure) insist, that an adulterer has a right to the state of grace stemming from partaking in the Eucharist, as though a resolve to reject mortal sin was not a necessary condition for the outpouring of God's grace.
This is where subjectivism, the internal forum, comes in handy. It is necessary. If an adulterer (and his "discerning" confessor) simply manages to convince himself, that sinning is pleasing to God, then he absolves himself and becomes worthy. A properly formatted priest might help here too.
In Poland Bergoglio complained about a lacking formation of priests. He wants shades of grey instead of God's clearly pronounced commandments. He wants confessros "discerning".
I ask, how can Bergoglio guarantee a method of teaching, which will lead to such formation of priests, that their discernment in each particular and... messy case will be aligned with God's judgement?
How will sodomite priests discern, for example? Will they not be biased toward
cerebration of fornication?
Despicable characters, Bergoglians.
Another bergoglian heretic declared " sodomy is a gift from God " .
http://tradcatknight.blogspot.com/2016/12/stage-is-being-set-for-apostate-church.html?m=1
When you read terms like "reeducation centers"you know your dealing with Marxist Communism .when young men training to be Priests are reprimanded for showing reverance to the Eucharist ,you know your dealing with Satan's mininons
Bergoglio was never the pope, not for one second, NOT because he is a filthy, disgusting, blaspheming, power-mad psychopath arch-heretic. The reason Bergoglio is not now and never has been the Pope is because of JOSEPH RATZINGER, Pope Benedict XVI, still reigning.
Joseph Ratzinger’s attempted abdication was INVALID by the law itself, because it was made in SUBSTANTIAL ERROR.
Canon 188
A resignation made out of grave fear that is inflicted unjustly or out of malice, substantial error, or simony is invalid by the law itself.
Plus Cardinal Bergoglio is a Freemason which automatically excludes him from office. Interesting that you pin this to the confirmation of the heresy to the bishops of Argentina. The publicity of this falls exactly to 3 1/2 years. Always an interesting time-frame. After his election.
Vox, Thanks for the GREAT! work. This article on St. Edmund Campion is long but precious. If people take the time, they'll be glad they did. His times were very much as our own in these dark days. At very least, please, please read Footnote #88. It sheds so much light on the antagonists to the Faith down through the ages. God bless us all! http://catholicism.org/evelyn-waughs-edmund-campion.html
Anonymous, the most convincing reason I have seen for the abdication of BXVI being invalid is that, according to his assistant Georg Ganshwein, (Archbishop?), he intended to create a dual papacy, which simply cannot be. This intention would render his abdication null, according to what I have read.
BXVI's attempted abdication was invalid because it was made in SUBSTANTIAL ERROR.
http://tradcatknight.blogspot.com/2016/11/francis-antipope-black-guelphs-matter.html?m=1
@ Paul Morphy
Pope Benedict bears equal culpability for this dreadful papacy. Francis needs to be removed from office, and quickly.
Post a Comment