Who thought this modernist thug was ever fit for ordination?
Clearly trying to distance himself from the blowback that his boss might remove the red hats from the Four Cardinals, this intellectually challenged clericalist and papal hitman has, by his seemingly backing off, doubles down.
Maike Hickson has the story at OnePeterFive.
Let's take a look at hit-man Pinto's statement, shall we?
They have written to the pope and that is correct and legitimate. But, after there did not come [from the pope] an answer after a few weeks, they published the case. That is a slap in the face. The pope can choose to take counsel with his cardinals; but that is something different from imposing upon him a counsel.
The Cardinals followed Scripture. They addressed the matter privately. When that did not elicit a response, they took it "to the Church." They had every right and duty to ask the questions and every right to expect an answer.
They are not a council with any kind of competences. On the contrary, they as cardinals are bound in a higher degree to be loyal to the pope. He stands for the gift of unity, the charisma of Peter. That is where the cardinals have to support him, and not hinder him. By what authority do the authors of the letter act? On the fact that they are cardinals? That is not sufficient. Please. Of course they can write to the pope and send him their questions, but to oblige him to answer and to publish the case is another matter.
The first loyalty of the Cardinals and any Catholic is loyalty to Christ. We don't worship the Pope. What Pinto is suggesting is papolatry and a sin.
The absolute majority of the first synod and a two-thirds majority in the second, in which the members of the bishops’ conferences were present, have exactly approved these theses that now the four cardinals contest.
The man is deluded or he is a liar. I suggest he is a liar and he needs to be called out for it. Synod votes must be two-thirds. Neither Synod voted to allow Holy Communion for those living in adultery. That is what Francis Bergoglio did, notwithstanding. The majority did not vote for this.
I am not the type who can threaten [people]. To write something like this is quite a journalistic license and is not serious. What I have said is, rather: Francis is a lighthouse of mercy and has infinite patience. For him, it is about agreeing, not about forcing. It was a serious act that these four have published their letter. But to think that he would remove their cardinalate – no. I do not believe that he will do that. […] In itself, as pope, he could do such a thing. The way I know Francis, he will not do it.
Well, the light's gone out in that "lighthouse of mercy." I don't believe Pinto. I have every belief that this was and continues to be discussed and as I opined earlier, this was a trial balloon.
This is crazy. Such a council of cardinals does not exist that could hold the pope accountable. The task of the cardinals is to help the pope in the exercise of his office – and not to obstruct him or to give him precepts. And this is a fact: Francis is not only in full accordance with the teaching, but also with all of his predecessors in the 20th century, and that was a Golden Age with excellent popes – starting with Pius X.
Again, the man is in to deception. Francis has made an abrupt rupture with his predecessors. Not one of them would have promulgated Amoris Laetitia. The man is deluded and frankly, promoting evil. The first duty of the Cardinals is to Christ. If the Pope is acting contrary, then there are examples in history and in the writings of Saints and Doctors on what must be done. That process has begun. These men are monsters and now that they know that they have been found out, expect their anger to increase along with their evil.
I am shocked, especially about the gesture of Meisner. Meisner was a great bishop of an important diocese [Cologne] – how sad that he now with this action puts a shadow upon his history. Meisner, a great spiritual leader! That he would arrive at that, I did not expect. He was very close to John Paul II and Benedict, and he knows that Benedict XVI and Francis are in full agreement about the analysis and the conclusions when it comes to the question of marriage. And Burke – we have worked together. He seemed to me to be an amiable person. Now I would ask him: Your Eminence, why did you do that?
The man is a heresiarch, a common thug, a pathetic excuse for a priest.
But we must thank him, he has exposed himself and those around Bergoglio for what they are.
9 comments:
Francis is "a lighthouse of mercy"? Pullease ! Any more of this and I shall be admitted to the Psych. Unit for endless hysterical laughter! Pinto should shut up. (Or be locked up!) He is an embarrassment to himself and everyone else.
The man says: Francis is not only in full accordance with the teaching, but also with all of his predecessors in the 20th century, and that was a Golden Age with excellent popes – starting with Pius X.
It pains a regular person, with limited knowledge of Church doctrine and law, to see churchmen lie so unashamedly. It is not possible that Christ is within him. e
Firstly, Bergoglio was installed via machinations, not in accordance with Church law. It is questionable that he is a valid pope, Secondly, the synod Cardinals did not agree on Bergoglio's agenda. He pushed it through regardless, via machinations. Thirdly, it is a matter of personal opinion that the 20th century was a golden age with excellent popes. Many could successfully claim the opposite (paedophilia scandals and dying parishes come to mind). Fourthly, Bergoglio promised to uphold Church teaching, not the teaching of 20th century heretics, rabbis (Jesus not needed by Jews), and atheists Bergoglio so likes.
The continuity of Church teaching MUST go all the way back to Christ and His
Apostles. For example, sodomy is a deadly sin, not a gift to the Church.
This man is such a disgrace to humanity (not only to the Church), it is painful to think about it. Those Bergoglians seem to believe that we are all idiots. They are not even trying to be somewhat correct in their claims. They just spout ridiculous lies.
Unfortunately and tragically, many follow them.
Don "Devil Eyes" Pinto is perhaps a winnowing fork of God as noted in Matthew 3:12:
"His winnowing fork is in his hand, and he will clear his threshing floor, gathering his wheat into the barn and burning up the chaff with unquenchable fire."
Michael Dowd: How can he be the winnowing fork when he is obviously the chaff that will be burned w/unquenchable fire? Needless to say all those who continue in Francis' church, same as in Henry VIII's church or Luther's Church, have voted w/their feet and are the same as the silent bishops and cardinals (or those who like Pinto states: agree w/Francis). When Jesus' judges what will be the evidence that one was a sheep or a goat -- a blog post, reading a blog post, commenting on a blog post -- or not keeping silent in the assembly, but declaring God's truth boldly before the great congregation??
"Those Bergoglians seem to believe that we are all idiots."
Idiots or not, what they know is that we cannot use the weapons they use (dark side/evil manneouvers) so they have an advantage for as long as God allows it. They think they are free to move forward and "triumph".
Once God steps in, their game will be over, but meanwhile they will try to do as much damage as they can, without remorse and in plain sight.
M.
It is interesting to note that Pinto's name appears in the Pecorelli List. The Pecorelli List contains not only the full names of individual clerics in the Vatican II Church but also their member numbers, their Masonic code names (monograms), and the dates they were were initiated into the Lodge.
Pinto’s entry records that he officially enrolled in the P2 Lodge on April 2, 1970, as member no. 3317-42, receiving the code name “PIPIVI”. At the time, he would have been 29 years of age.
Well said Vox.
What is noticeable is that Pinto does not talk about the substance of doctrine at all.
Only the soap opera and unlimited human loyalty to a cult leader.
(from 'Paddy' Irishman)
Anonymous Anonymous said...
"Michael Dowd: How can he be the winnowing fork when he is obviously the chaff that will be burned w/unquenchable fire?"
God is using Pinto's devilish actions as the winnowing fork to sift believers from non-believers.
Pinto looks like he needs an Excorsist. It looks as if he's full of demons of anger which is a Mortal Sin to be that angry. He should start praying the Rosary.
Post a Comment