Thursday, 22 October 2020

Bergoglio sows confusion. Confusion is of the Devil. What exactly did he say? Does it even matter now?


Due to a comment in the blog with a link that is highlighted a this blog by Mark Lambert, I am reminded this morning of the quote from Richard Gailladartz that Rosica used as his own and which this blogger first reported proving Rosica's plagiarism. It was in 2015.

"Will this Pope re-write controversial Church doctrines? No. But that isn't how doctrine changes. Doctrine changes when pastoral contexts shift and new insights emerge such that particularly doctrinal formulations no longer mediate the saving message of God's transforming love. Doctrine changes when the Church has leaders and teachers who are not afraid to take note of new contexts and emerging insights. It changes when the Church has pastors who do what Francis has been insisting: leave the securities of your chanceries, of your rectories, of your safe places, of your episcopal residences go set aside the small minded rules that often keep you locked up and shielded from the world."

As Mr. Lambert says, "It is too late." 

Mr. Lambert features how not only the media but allegedly Catholic priests and self-proclaimed theologians have jumped on this and confirmed the narrative headline by CNA rather than this apparent translation and CNA is trying to back pedal. Yet, they confirm that Bergoglio said, "What we have to create is a civil union law. That way they are legally covered. I stood up for that," referring to his time as Archbishop of Buenos Aires and the Argentinian debate on same-sex alleged marriage.

The fault here for this now mass confusion and media hype is on one person and only one. Jorge Mario Bergoglio. The man's mind is poisoned, his intellect darkened. His conscience corrupted. He is a petulant, arrogant egotist. A movie called "Francesco." What bovine excrement and false humility. A truly humble pope would never have agreed to a movie on himself.

We are exhausted by this man, this rotten papacy. We long for a Catholic pope, not a globalist, Marxist pandering heretic who hates Christ. As a commenter on this post at Father Z states quite correctly. "Francis has, in a spiritual way, demonstrated to me the sort of demoralization that the periodically beaten son of a drunken father must experience." 

The man is evil. He is an evil stepfather. He has defiled our Mother and is an abusive monster drunken on power. 

It is time to come to the conclusion that others have come to. The man has no grace of office. He has no guidance of the Holy Spirit.  If he had the grace and the guidance then he would not have done this.

He is possessed of the devil. 

It can only lead to one conclusion.  

15 comments:

Barbara Jensen said...

It is my assessment through reading various 'statements' by Bergoglio that he is trashing the Church and is intending ' full steam ahead ' in order to expedite this trashing. In 2013 (or 2014 ??) I read a presentation he delivered to the seminarians in Rome. It was the Year of Mercy. First, before I get into what he told the priests in training, in the Year of Mercy, in the Year of Mercy he distorted what God's mercy actually is. That is another post for another time. In the talk to the seminarians Bergoglio told them that, if a penitent comes into the confessional and does not say anything, the priest should 'give him absolution anyway'. He explained that 'just by the person coming in the confessional is proof he is sorry for his sins and so nothing else is needed. In one fell swoop Bergoglio trashed the peerless Sacrament of Penance. I was the last generation that was taught the fullness of the Catholic Faith. I learned that the verbal confession of sins, the verbal expression of sorrow for those sins, and the verbal and heartfelt 'firm purpose of amendment' must be evident in a valid Confession.

The latest trashing is the blatant contradiction of the Church''s teaching on homosexual acts. What will follow now is that those who find acknowledging the paucity of grace and guidance of the Holy Spirit in this man's 'fruits' too difficult to face, will turn themselves into human pretzels in order to keep the unity of the Church. The Church is where the fullness of the Faith is upheld and proclaimed. You cannot be in union with those who trash and deny the Faith. Our obedience must be to the fullness of the Faith.

Brothers and sisters, draw close to the Living Christ, especially in His Holy Eucharistic Presence.. He will be our Sustenance in this horrific time. God help us all. Mother Mary pray for us!

Vox Cantoris said...

Thank you, Barbara. It is truly sad.

Tom A. said...

Flee this evil man, flee from all those that support him and recognize him as Christ’s Vicar on Earth. He is a vicar of Satan not of Christ. He has turned once Catholic Churches into temples of the Devil. Walk out of your Novus Ordo church today and never look back. Your soul depends on it.

Unknown said...

"Bergoglio sows confusion. Confusion is of the Devil."

That's all what's needed to be said.
And understood.

Ivan

NBW said...

From the moment he stepped out onto the balcony as "pope", there was something in his manner and expression that gave me a sense of foreboding. Bergoglio has been brought into the papacy to help bring down the Church. We have endured countless poisonous remarks, statements and actions that have intentionally wounded the Catholic Church and it's members.
Bergoglio is a worldly man who feeds off the attention he receives. I have not seen another pope who has had so many books,articles and films written about himself. This is a secular man who early on seems to have traded the supernatural for worldly riches and power. We cannot loose the Faith; we must continue to be vigilant, pray and fight for the Holy Church and pray for Bergoglio that he repent and do penance. We must pray for our own souls as well.

Paul-A. Hardy said...

Perhaps the institutional framework and real estate people identify as the "the Church" has grown too rotten to save. Benedict XVI's resignation gave the signal. What has in the past operated as a restraining factor (katechon) has been withdrawn. The first signs of this withdrawal emerged under Paul VI who made full inquiry into what was amiss. That inquiry was effectively suppressed under John Paul II. Benedict XVI made an attempt. Then he discovered a spiritual fact: It was too late. Nothing to do no except wait, i.e. await the Parousia.

LineInTheSand said...

He’s guilty of formal, manifest heresy if he said something heretical. It’s not a rumour. It is public, undeniable. It’s not at all likely he doesn’t know what the Church really teaches. It’s not at all likely he doesn’t mean what He said. He can’t be pope without contradicting the pope’s never failing faith. It is not just manifest heresy.

Either he is not the pope or Vatican I is wrong.

It’s either benevacantism or sedevacantism, Reason and true faith does not give us another option. Contradictions don’t exist.

Kathleen1031 said...

He no longer shocks us. After his veneration of Pachamama, this is a pale follow-up. He routinely has enjoyed lobbing a grenade into the middle of faithful Catholics, him and his infernal "hagan lio", (holy mess). He enjoys this, in the same way a sadist enjoys tormenting victims. He does it too regularly for it to be accidental. I would like to tell him, you have no effect on us any longer, that stopped years ago. You no longer surprise, appall, or sadden us, your words have no power, your actions mean nothing. You are not the Vicar of Christ, you cannot be the pope, unless popes can be evil.
We are out of the mainstream Catholic Church. We are Catholics and will always be, but no party to this. The Latin Rite. Find it.

Tom A. said...

What came out of Vatican 2 was far worse than all the nonsense that has come out of Bergoglio’s pie hole. Frankie is not the problem, Vatican 2 and the NO are the problems.

Barbara Jensen said...

Ann Barnhardt has an excellent quote of Robert Bellarmine which relates well to Bergoglio's latest error. what he explains must be faced. Listening, good Bishops???

Anonymous said...

I think Ann Bernhardt is right,Benedict is Pope, Francis is Bishop of Rome, does he even use the term Vicar of Christ?Benedict tried to split the Papacy into an active/contemplative dual role. He has remained in the Vatican, still giving his Apostalic Blessing, wearing white. Who was the Bishop dressed in white in the secret of Fatima,he was not referred to as Holy Father or Pope. How could a true Pope bring idols into St Peters, and use St Peters as a light show for environmentalism on the Feast of the Immaculate Conception, I refuse to believe a true Pope could do that.

Tom A. said...

What good is a Latin Rite said in union with Bergoglio?

Tom A. said...

Benny is just as guilty of heresy as Frankie.

LineInTheSand said...

Can someone please tell me straight, if Father Martin said that homosexuals should have civil unions and have a right to have a family, would such a statement be a heresy?

None of the public rebukes aimed at him reassures me that he did not manifestly say something heretical. None of them. They don't even touch the heresy question. Whether he didn't officially teach it is none of my concern.

Is it heresy, yes or no?

Tom A. said...

LineInTheSand, Vatican 2 taught heresy. We should not be looking at Bergoglio as the source of the Church’s problems. Nor should we be looking for conservative modernists to fix those problems. The problem is Vatican 2. Until one is ready to discard Vatican 2 and all who promulgated it and seperate onself from all who adhere to it, one is simply chasing ones tail.