A corporal work of mercy.

A corporal work of mercy.
Click on photo for this corporal work of mercy!

Monday 13 September 2021

I agree with you, Bergoglio - "BASTA"

Indeed, basta of Bergoglio! 


That's right, you heard me.

Stupid old heretic. The traditional Mass I attended yesterday was offered by a priest in a parish and he offers both the old and new. He was born after Vatican II and was ordained from the new books by a bishop consecrated under the new books. Of course, I accept Vatican II and the new books as valid.

Bergoglio is an evil, stinking community idiot and I have no more patience for his crud.

Regarding the Motu proprio Traditionis custodes,the pope "insisted that the celebration of the ancient rite must not be a pretext for refusing Vatican II." "We must put a limit and basta," he insisted before the French prelates, so that a liturgical attraction is not the cover of an ideological posture. At the same time, the Successor of Peter encouraged them to adopt a "paternal attitude" towards the faithful. Motu proprio, presidential, Islam... what Pope Francis said to the French bishops (famillechretienne.fr)

 

7 comments:

Anonymous said...

Bergoglio and Biden - “birds of a feather”. Neither are Catholic and neither serve God.

Anonymous said...

Vatican II is Null, Void, and Worthless. Read Msgr. Vigano letters, or listen to Fr. Hesse (Dr. in Canon law), he proved that Vatican II is Heretical and Schismatic. Stay away from Vatican. It is rotten to the core. I went to an Orthodox church last weekend. Beautiful Mass! Bergoglio is not in the Canon of the Mass. It feels good, and it serves the Greater good. Orthodox Christians and true Catholics, unite! Jesus want us to be one. God Bless.

Paul Dale said...

At both Anonymous

Birds of a feather indeed! Both fake, both anti pope/president.

That Bergolio's name was not mentioned in the canon of the Mass is amazing news - so you partook of a valid and licit Mass and not a schismatic one in union with the antipope. Hopefully your priest said it in union with the only pope still gloriously reigning: His Holiness Pope Benedict XVI. Please get these faithful priests to proseletyse to other faithful orthodox priests. When truly faithful clergy and laity understand that resisting the antipope is not the catholic option. If we are not in union with Benedict we are not catholic. Period. Only by faithful priests returning back to His Holiness will the remnant expand and true Catholicism will flourish and defeat the Deep Church.

If possible please pass on the priest's name to Brother Bugnolo at fromrome.info which will be kept private but add to the growing number.

The priests of the radtrad institutes who suck upto "Francis" are I am afraid not catholic and partake in a schismatic Mass which has not any merits.

Catholic Mission said...

SEPTEMBER 21, 2021
Pope Francis and Pope Benedict cannot deny that Vatican Council II can be interpreted with a rational or irrational premise to produce two different conclusions and they have chosen the false premise. The evidence is there in public.The College of Cardinals must respond.

The pope may deny that he supports homosexual unions but he cannot deny that Vatican Council II can be interpreted with a rational or irrational premise to produce two different conclusions, one is traditional and the other non traditional.So he has chosen the false premise, like Pope Benedict, to create a false rupture with Tradition.For political-Left reasons he does not choose the rational premise and so affirm traditional ecclesiocentrism. Both the present two popes have used the false premise. The evidence is there before us in public.The College of Cardinals must respond.

With the false premise Pope Francis is changing doctrine and theology. It is not just a disciplinary change.He may say that his public statements on homosexuality are in a particular context, there is nothing in writing etc, but he and Pope Benedict have to admit that they reject the past ecclesiocentrism of the Church and to do this they interpret Vatican Council II with the irrational premise.Without this ruse there is no liberalism and they cannot make the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus obsolete, as they do today.

All Catholics simply have to use the rational premise to go back to Tradition. It is for the liberals for whom Vatican Council II will become an issue.This is when LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NA2, GS 22 etc, are seen as hypothetical cases always.So they cannot be practical exceptions for the Syllabus of Errors of Pope Pius X ( ecumenism of return ), the Catechism of Pope Pius X, 24Q,27Q (other religions and exclusive salvation in the Catholic Church), the Athanasius Creed ( all need the Catholic faith for salvation).

GERMAN SYNODAL PATH

Since the popes from Paul VI have interpreted Vatican Council II with the false premise there exists the German Synodal Way.It would fall flat if the Germans would choose to use the rational premise.

The Lefebvrist and Ecclesia Dei communities are also using the same fake premise and are unaware of it.So they do not correct the mistake of Pope Francis and Pope Benedict.Vatican Council II with the rational premise would not be an issue for the traditionalists.

PROOF OF THE FALSE PREMISE

1.Pope Francis wants the Ecclesia Dei communities to interpret Vatican Council II with the false premise and only then they will be allowed to offer the Latin Mass.
CONTINUED

Catholic Mission said...

CONTINUED
2.Pope Benedict told the Society of St. Pius X that they had to accept Vatican Council II( with the irrational and not rational premise) to be canonically accepted and that this was a doctrinal issue.So they had to use the false premise to create the New Theology which changed doctrine/dogma on outside the Church there is no salvation.

3.In two theological papers of the International Theological Commission,Pope Benedict and Cardinal Luiz Ladaria sj, have criticized Fr. Leonard Feeney and his exclusivist ecclesiocentrism.They also mention that Vatican Council II(LG 16 etc) contradicted the priest’s exclusivist understanding of salvation.In other words, LG 16 referred to visible and known non Catholics saved outside the Church, without faith and the baptism of water.This is irrational. In this way, with the false premise i.e by confusing invisible cases of being saved in invincible ignorance, as being visible, practical exceptions were created for the Syllabus of Errors of Pope Pius IX.Exceptions were created for the Syllabus of Errors of Pope Pius IX, the Catechism of Pope Pius X and Trent, EENS etc.



3.Cardinal Braz de Avez has told the Franciscan Sisters of the Immaculate that they had to accept Vatican Council II. He meant the Council had to be interpreted with the false premise and then a false rupture would be created with Tradition.

4.Archbishops Giacomo Morendi and Augustine di Noia of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, demanded that Brother Andre Marie MICM, and the religious community Slaves of the Immaculate Heart of Mary interpret the Catechism of the Catholic Church( 847-848) on invincible ignorance with the false premise. This is irrational.The CDF and the Diocese of Manchester, USA are using the false premise. Since the St. Benedict Center refuses to do likewise, a severe Decree of Prohibitions has been placed upon them since 2019.

5.The Abu Dhabi Statement of Pope Francis was attributed to a change in ecclesiology and theology created by Vatican Council II when the false premise is used to interpret the text.Without the fake premise the pope would have to say outside the Church there is no salvation.

6.The pontifical universities in Rome are following the leftist theology and so I am not allowed to study theology and philosophy at the pontifical universities Regina Apostolorum and St. Thomas Aquinas(Angelicum) in Rome. Since I interpret Vatican Council II , the Creeds, Catechism, EENS and other Magisterial documents, with the rational premise. So there is no hermeneutic of rupture with Tradition.I was not allowed to continue as a seminarian at the pontifical seminaries Maria Mater Ecclesia and Beda College,Rome.The funding scholarship was also stopped by Propaganda Fide, Vatican.

7.All Pope Benedict’s books on Vatican Council II and Ecclesiology are written with a false premise. So his conclusion is non traditional and not the Deposit of the Faith.It is the same with the books of Cardinal Walter Kasper, Cardinal Marcello Semeraro and Archbishop Bruno Forte.
CONTINUED

Catholic Mission said...

CONTINUED
8.The dialogue with the Lutherans was based upon Vatican Council II interpreted with the false premise. Otherwise with the rational premise, the Lutherans are outside the Church without Catholic faith (AG 7).While Unitatis Redintigratio 3 etc in Vatican Council II are not practical exceptions to 16th century EENS.

9.The Italian Government is giving Alberto Melloni and his institution in Bologna, Italy over a million euros a year when he interprets Vatican Council II with the fake premise.There is no objection from Pope Francis and Pope Benedict.His liberalism on ecumenism, salvation outside the Church etc would not be possible with Vatican Council II interpreted with the rational premise.

10.Pope Francis and Pope Benedict with their irrational interpretation of Vatican Council II are in schism with the past Magisterium. This is an impediment to offering Holy Mass. They are in an 'irregular situation'.

11.The pontifical universities Regina Apostolorum and John Lateran, Rome, along with German liberal theologians offer an academic course on Ratzinger Studies. It is based upon Vatican Council II interpreted irrationally. So it is politcally correct with the Left.The Wojtyla-Ratzinger interpretation of the Council is obsolete.It does not have a hermeneutic of continuity with Tradition.
12.The liberalism in the Church comes with the use of the false premise which makes the proclamation of the Social Reign of Christ the King in politics and Traditional Mission obsolete. With this liberalism in the Catholic Church today does not oppose Satanic political parties in Rome( Partito Democratico, Movimento Cinque Stelle etc).They promote homosexual unions, abortion, contraception,public immodesty, pornography on the offical media and pontifical heresy and schism in the Catholic Church.

13.Summorum Pontificum of Pope Benedict permitted the Holy Mass but only for the priests who interpreted Vatican Council II with the fake premise and so supported the New Ecclesiology which is a break with the past.

14.Matteo Salvini and the Lega political party in Italy do not know that Vatican Council II can be interpreted with the rational premise, like I interpret it.This will mean that the local bishops and the parish priests would be able to affirm the Social Reign of Christ the King in all politics(Quas Primas) and the necessity to vote for a Catholic political party, to save souls from going to Hell - without any one citing Vatican Council II (irrational) in opposition.The Council interpreted with the rational premise is in the interest of the centre right political parties in Italy.So the Church's theological attitude to migrants and non Catholics would be Conciliar and also traditional on salvation.

15.Bishop Robert Barron is now as obsolete on Vatican Council II as is Massimo Faggioli.
CONTINUED

Catholic Mission said...

CONTINUED

16. Pope Francis thinks it is the Mass which makes a Catholic or seminarian 'rigid' when it really is the use of the false premise.It is no more 'only they need to enter the Church who know about it'(LG 14).Instead, it is all need to enter the Catholic Church with no known exception.Invincible ignorance is not an exception to all needing to enter the Church with faith and the baptism of water(LG 14,AG 7 etc). So we evangelize since all non Catholics are oriented to Hell without faith and the baptism of water( AG 7, LG 14 etc).The norm for salvationis faith and baptism and not invincible ignorance. When I meet a non Catholic, I cannot know if he or she is an exception to the norm.If there is an exception it could only be known to God.I know that ther non Catholic before me is oriented to Hell.(Athanasius Creed, Vatican Council II(AG 7, LG 14),Catechism of the Catholic Church( 845,846,1257), Syllabus of Errors of Pope Pius IX etc.The non Catholic is not condemned as long as he or she is alive. There is hope.



17.The lay Catechists in my parish, Santa Maria di Nazareth, Casalotti, Boccea, Rome are forced to cheat and use a fake premise,inference and non traditional conclusion to interpret Vatican Council II.Then they emerge politically correct with the Vatican.They do not teach the young Catholics that there is exclusive salvation in the Catholic Church only.This is the diocese of Porta Santa Rufina, Rome under the Administration of the Archdiocese of Civitavecchia. -Lionel Andrades
Lionel Andrades
Promoter of the Lionel Andrades interpretation of Vatican Council II.Vatican Council II is dogmatic and not only pastoral.
Catholic lay man in Rome,
Writer on the discovery of the two interpretations of Vatican Council II, one is rational and the other is irrational, one is interpreted with the false premise and the other without it. One is Magisterial and the other, the common one, is non Magisterial.
It is the same for the Creeds and Catechisms.There can be two interpretations.
Why should Catholics choose an irrational version which is heretical, non traditional and schismatic, when a rational option is there which is traditional ?
Blog: Eucharist and Mission (eucharistandmission )
E-mail: lionelandrades10@gmail