"ONLY GOD KNOWS WHO IS REALLY THE POPE, BENEDICT OR FRANCIS
!!!!! IF I HAD TO GUESS I WOULD SAY THAT BENEDICT IS STILL THE POPE AND THAT
FRANCIS IS AN ANTI-POPE, BUT THAT IS JUST MY INTUITION, NOT MY
CANONICAL/THEOLOGICAL OPINION"
At his blog, he features the entire LifeSiteNews article summarising the arguments.
What is my opinion?
Bergoglio is Pope because Canon Law was, as far as we can know, followed. The priests of the diocese of Rome, the Cardinals and people of God accept and recognise him as Pope, ergo, he is Pope.
There are serious questions arising from the resignation of Joseph Ratzinger. I believe he was pushed and that he was not forthcoming about this. I find the Barnhardt and VeriCatholici arguments compelling. Pope Benedict XVI by various actions has given us sufficient reason to doubt the validity.
My own personal experience upon the election of Bergoglio, the urge to vomit and chills and yet, I had never heard of Jorge Mario Bergoglio, was a sign to me that something was terribly wrong.
Bergoglio is the Pope according to what we know and can know based upon what we see.
Does he have have, did he ever have the grace of office? If he had it, has he lost it by his obvious apostasy and heresy? These are legitimate questions and the people who ask them should not be mocked.
Does he have have, did he ever have the grace of office? If he had it, has he lost it by his obvious apostasy and heresy? These are legitimate questions and the people who ask them should not be mocked.
May God save his people.
12 comments:
What if...
Benedict answered the Dubia?
As usual, very well said.
An oasis of calm sanity here.
Vox, do you believe that Francis is assisted by the Holy Ghost when he teaches the universal church on matters of faith and morals?
Of interest
https://nonvenipacem.com/
It is not possible that the Holy Spirir is responsible for the heresies the blasphemies in the apostasies out of the mouth of Francis. If he is teaching something on faith or morals that contradicts that which has come before simple logic and reason must conclude that he is guided by something different.
I do not usually comment in the comment box. I leave that for everybody else.
I do believe the potential is high that he has lost any grace of Office if indeed he ever had it. The implication of that, of course, seems pretty obvious.
A man of character never fails to address direct questions on important issues where confusion is causing grave harm.
My parent's taught me that to not acknowledge legitimate inquiries is a far worse evil, than answering them angrily.
The latter, at least, shows an acknowledgement of the human dignity of those seeking answers.
The former denies human dignity.
That lack of acknowledgement insults The Creator, as well.
Karl
"and people of God accept and recognise him as Pope"
Firstly "people of God" requires precise definition.
Then it must be questioned of a large portion of the same defined above if they do indeed recognize Bergoglio as Pope, or perhaps Benedict XVI, or even a sede vacante present condition.
I, if I do meet the with definition of those referred to as 'people of God', follow many messages to current visionaries and seers that tell us that Pope Benedict XVI is Pope in the eyes of God.
It would be extremely helpful if someone like Edward Pentin was allowed to have a extensive interview with Benedict to help clear up this mess. Benedict owes it to the church. If everything is above board, why any reluctance?
The Pope has a confessor and retains the free will to sin and sin mortally. A Pope is not a puppet of the Holy Ghost. God does NOT compel belief or obedience. A Pope can and obviously is teaching heresy. Really people there are enough writings of the Church fathers and many books from numerous holy men and women down through the ages to teach us about the will of God and to console us with the grace of the Blessed Trinity. Ignore the unholy Peronist in white he will be judged in God's own time.
"and people of God accept and recognise him as Pope" Part II
The fact that devout Catholics continue to attend mass on Sundays is not a confirmation of Bergoglio as Pope.
What difference does it make if all "people of God" recognize Bergoglio as Pope? Is it not infinitely more important who God recognizes as Pope or have the "people of God" decided to keep God out of this.
2/3 = .666
2 being the # of man
3 the # of God
666 the # of the beast
Then why do we need a pope if he isn't protected by the Holy Ghost? I agree that we should totally ignore Bergoglio but because there is no way this guy is assisted by the Holy Ghost. If he were a Pope, and therefore assisted by the Holy Ghost, then we are duty bound to assent.
Assistance does not mean he can’t go off the rails.
Post a Comment