“Pope Francis has abolished the places where souls were supposed to go after death: hell, purgatory, heaven. The idea he holds is that souls dominated by evil and unrepentant cease to exist, while those that have been redeemed from evil will be taken up into beatitude, contemplating God.”
The second heresy is "Universalism." This is the heresy that everyone is saved.
Sandro Magister has written this morning about the various times Jorge Bergoglio has either "corrected" Our Lord Jesus Christ or the Holy Apostles, or he has manipulated the words of Our Lord and Holy Scripture by not finishing the sentence.
It is a revealing and damning indictment of Bergoglio and the lapdog minions like Greg Burke who help him sell his snake oil.
What follows below are the highlights of the Gospel According to Bergoglio, the rest of this indictment can be read at:
http://magister.blogautore.espresso.repubblica.it/2017/10/20/worlds-end-update-the-last-things-according-to-francis/
On Wednesday, October 11, at the general audience in Saint
Peter’s Square, Francis said that such a judgment is not to be feared, because
“at the end of our history there is the merciful Jesus,” and therefore
“everything will be saved. Everything.”
In the text distributed to the journalists accredited to the
Holy See, this last word, “everything,” was emphasized in boldface.
*
At another general audience a few months ago, on Wednesday,
August 23, Francis gave for the end of history an image that is entirely and
only comforting: that of “an immense tent, where God will welcome all mankind
so as to dwell with them definitively.”
An image that is not his own but is taken from chapter 21 of
Revelation, but from which Francis was careful not to cite the following words
of Jesus:
“The victor will inherit these gifts, and I shall be his
God, and he will be my son. But as for cowards, the unfaithful, the depraved,
murderers, the unchaste, sorcerers, idol-worshipers, and deceivers of every
sort, their lot is in the burning pool of fire and sulfur, which is the second
death.”
*
And again, in commenting during the Angelus of Sunday,
October 15 on the parable of the wedding banquet (Matthew 22: 1-14) that was
read at all the Masses on that day, Francis carefully avoided citing the most unsettling
parts.
Both that in which “the king became indignant, sent his
troops, had those murderers killed and their city burned.”
And that in which, having seen “one man who was not wearing
the wedding garment,” the king ordered his servants: “Bind him hand and foot
and throw him out into the darkness; there shall be weeping there, and gnashing
of teeth.”
*
On the previous Sunday, October 8, another parable, that of
the murderous vine dressers (Matthew 21:33-43), had undergone the same
selective treatment.
In commenting on the parable during the Angelus, the pope
left out what the owner of the vineyard does to those farmers who killed the
servants and finally the son: “He will put those wretches to a miserable
death.” Much less did he cite the concluding words of Jesus, referring to
himself as the “cornerstone”: “He who falls on this stone will be broken to
pieces; but when it falls on any one, it will crush him.”
27 comments:
Every day PF & his minions repeatedly vocalise heresy after heresy, blasphemy after blasphemy, profanity after profanity, scurrilous name-calling & mockery of Orthodox Catholics & still no formal correction has been made. How long do we have to endure this Apostate & his fellow Apostates charged with the administration of the CC despite not having one iota of the Truth between them. Are the so-called 'conservative' prelates not concerned about the spiritual welfare of the souls that are being fed demonic atrocities from holders of Episcopal Offices & Vatican Departments on a daily basis? At this stage surely we are entitled to ask what the reason is for this ten month hold-up & the recently reported stalling of the Polish Bishops own Dubia by no other than PF himself?
in Cumberland (UK) we have an unrepeatable term, in polite circumstances, from which orifice the words of Papa Bergoglio emanate.
Thanks Vox for keeping us current on Francis latest heresy. All I can say is that Our Lord has remarkable patience.
Be thankful ,their showing their true colours ,their crawling out from under the rock where they have been concealing themselves for decades .
Thank you so much, Vox, for putting all this together for us. It makes absolutely clear that the imposter seated on the Chair of Peter does not believe the Gospel he continually twists and distorts for his own, one world, one false church purposes.
The so called conservative prelates that you place your hope in, are themselves guilty of promoting their own heresies and blasphemies with false exumenism, false religious liberty, and the new mass. So stop looking for heretics to correct a heretic.
This selective quoting of Scripture did not begin with Bergoglio, but was brought by Vatican II in the 1970 Missal. For most readings, there is a "long form" and a "short form." The short form has all the inconvenient bits removed - and is usually the one that is read at Mass.
We must not be storming heaven with prayer. Every day the sun comes up and there he is, ready to begin anew. He's got a lot of energy for a guy with one lung. He does an awful lot of talking.
Lord, deliver us from him and his evil companions soon.
Please read this very carefully:
https://remnantnewspaper.com/web/index.php/articles/item/3491-raymond-cardinal-burke-new-apologist-for-the-sedevacantists
WHEN WILL ENOUGH EVER BE ENOUGH?
When will semi-traditionalists ever revert to Catholicism? Catholic doctrine tells us plainly that an heretic cannot be Pope formaliter. To insist and persist in recognizing an heretic as Pope, is to blatantly and obstinately refute the teaching of Popes, Saints, Doctors of the Church, Vatican I and Catholic theologians. It is nothing less than most culpable willfull blindness. It is the aiding and abetting of heretics!!! "Recognizing and Resisting" a Sovereign Pontiff, the Vicar of Christ, does not exist in Catholic ecclesiology. There is no such thing! R&R a Pope is a non-Catholic, damnable, schismatic myth!
The Holy See is ever untouched by error. There has never been an heretical Pope in the history of the Church. There never will be! The Catholic Church is infallible and indefectible. It cannot teach anything harmful to the salvation of souls. It is protected by Christ and the Holy Ghost!
What more must bergoglio do to convince semi-trads that he is not Pope and that the judeo-masonic NO church is not the Catholic Church? In the old days, things were not so clear; so cut and dried; so blatantly obvious. Then there was room for discussion, for seeking explanations and conclusions. Those days are long gone for the informed. Now it's time, for those who know, to stand up and declare themselves for Christ and His Church - to be proper Catholics; real Catholics; traditional Catholics. The gloves are off! Stand and be counted, or be damned!
Do bergoglio and his satanic cohorts teach a different Gospel? Well, if they do, then why ignore and disobey St. Paul? Why cosy up to them? Why pray with them? Why seek union with them? WHY RECOGNIZE THEM AS CATHOLICS?
To declare bergoglio Pope and his minions Catholic hierarchy, is to declare the gates of hell victorious and Christ a liar!
Words alone, reason alone, magisterial teaching alone, will not convince, or convert hardened hearts without the grace of the Holy Ghost. Our Lord Jesus Himself could not convert those without ears to hear. Inflame our hearts, O Lord, with the fire of the Holy Spirit, so that we may not fear the enemy and so that we may be true sons and daughters of the Holy Catholic Church.
I hear you Peter.
This old blasphemer is hoping that his soul will be annihilated. Why? Because his heart condemns him! He knows he's sinning. Possibly he knows he's in a state of mortal sin.
@ Paul Morphy
The only possible defence is that whatever he did say has been deliberately manipulated. That is the only possible defence at this stage.
The Chair of St.Peter is occupied by something which is not the papacy as bequeathed by Our Lord Jesus Christ, Son of God, to humanity.
This blatant heresy, and heretic, has to be removed from the papacy, and order needs to be restored. I don't know how this removal should take place, but take place it must. The hierarchy now possess more evidence of what is in our midst. It is they who must act. If they don't, they we the Laity must act.
We know that the martyrs, the saints the angels and God Himself and His Blessed Mother are observing this.
We live in what are desperate times. But let us not despair because the victory was won at Calvary.
Good Bless you, Vox. All of us here owe you a debt of gratitude.
Now that you all recognize that the one who sits on Peter's Seat is not a Catholic it is our duty to pray for the conversion of the same.
Dear Peter Lamb,
you know why. It has been named diabolical disorientation. Your reasoning is very sound, but through the very clever machinations of Satan, the disoriented have long ago adopted cognitive dissonance as higher "logic" - the "logic" of unity between the mutually exclusive (such as evolution of the unchangeable, or sameness where there is nothing but difference, or beheading as an expression of peaceful coexistence) and the "logic" of announcing spontaneously emerging truths through plotting, scheming, deceiving and backstabbing by - allegedly - THE Holy Spirit.
I believe that this diabolic disorientation on such an enormous scale was possible as a result of lukewarmness of countless individual souls, of divorcing life ("realities" and "complexities" of life) from truth, understood as relative to circumstances and the viewing angle, also as an ideal impossible to achieve.
And yet, everyone who loves truth, speaks truthfully, and corrects mistakes with a renewed heart and hope, can see through this horrific web of stupidity, wickedness and lies. The problem is that Truth has been marginalized and slandered, that (as Canadian courts have decided) speaking truth is no longer a valid defense. Speaking truth has been criminalized. Only a minority does not kneel before this... mercy.
Speaking truth is unacceptable, it makes a sinner aware of his sin, and that doesn't feel good!
As Bergoglio repeats, sadness is forbidden! Only joy is permitted! Why be sad rather than sin boldly and make mess, if God's commandments are for the condemned Pharisees, and there is no hell for everyone else!?
One thing we should remember, before we ALL, all he evolved and about to ascend the new heaven on earth, rejoice - We must have wealth redistribution, and equal outcomes for everyone! Equity! - Straight from the UN, from the Vatican, or from hell - all interchangeably.
If humanity's goal is equal outcomes for everyone, since anything other than this would be unjust, how can we have two different "places" such a salvation and damnation?
Alas, what Peter Lamb and many others have written is true!
Heartbreakingly so! On our knees, everyone, and pray that Almighty God in His Infinite Mercy will forgive us all our sins of omission, whereby we have propagated this great evil and encouraged it to grow and flourish in the Church! Kyrie Eleison!
Re:Anonymous said...Please read this very carefully:
https://remnantnewspaper.com/web/index.php/articles/item/3491-raymond-cardinal-burke-new-apologist-for-the-sedevacantists
Comment:
Michael Dowd •
What is said here is technically correct but intellectually and emotionally unsatisfying. Since Vatican II when the intent to Protestantize the Church was put into practice most Catholics have effectively lost their Catholic faith via Pastoral distortion and failure to teach true doctrine. With Pope Francis this distortion has become utterly manifest. In other words we have a Church proclaiming heresy in a defacto, i.e., Pastoral, way. Consequently, how can Sedevancantists or members or SSPX be faulted for trying to find a place where unadulterated Catholic doctrine is taught for the sake of themselves and their children?
There is no such thing! R&R a Pope is a non-Catholic, damnable, schismatic myth!
Thus far, the words of The Novus Ordo Witch. However, we Catholics actually do have a famous and faithful Catholic teaching us to do exactly that;
++++++++++++= begun quotes +++++++++++++++++
Chapter 3.
What is to be done if one or more dissent from the rest.
[7.] What then will a Catholic Christian do, if a small portion of the Church have cut itself off from the communion of the universal faith?
What, surely, but prefer the soundness of the whole body to the unsoundness of a pestilent and corrupt member?
What, if some novel contagion seek to infect not merely an insignificant portion of the Church, but the whole?
Then it will be his care to cleave to antiquity, which at this day cannot possibly be seduced by any fraud of novelty.
Chapter 10.
Why Eminent Men are permitted by God to become Authors of Novelties in the Church.
[27.] But some one will ask, How is it then, that certain excellent persons, and of position in the Church, are often permitted by God to preach novel doctrines to Catholics? A proper question, certainly, and one which ought to be very carefully and fully dealt with, but answered at the same time, not in reliance upon one's own ability, but by the authority of the divine Law, and by appeal to the Church's determination.
Let us listen, then, to Holy Moses, and let him teach us why learned men, and such as because of their knowledge are even called Prophets by the apostle, are sometimes permitted to put forth novel doctrines, which the Old Testament is wont, by way of allegory, to call “strange gods,” forasmuch as heretics pay the same sort of reverence to their notions that the Gentiles do to their gods.
[28.] Blessed Moses, then, writes thus in Deuteronomy: “If there arise among you a prophet or a dreamer of dreams,” that is, one holding office as a Doctor in the Church, who is believed by his disciples or auditors to teach by revelation: well—what follows? “and gives you a sign or a wonder, and the sign or the wonder come to pass whereof he spoke,”— he is pointing to some eminent doctor, whose learning is such that his followers believe him not only to know things human, but, moreover, to foreknow things superhuman, such as, their disciples commonly boast, were Valentinus, Donatus, Photinus, Apollinaris, and the rest of that sort! What next? “And shall say to you, Let us go after other gods, whom you know not, and serve them.” What are those other gods but strange errors which you know not, that is, new and such as were never heard of before? “And let us serve them;” that is, “Let us believe them, follow them.” What last? “You shall not hearken to the words of that prophet or dreamer of dreams.” And why, I pray you, does not God forbid to be taught what God forbids to be heard? “For the Lord, your God, tries you, to know whether you love Him with all your heart and with all your soul.” The reason is clearer than day why Divine Providence sometimes permits certain doctors of the Churches to preach new doctrines— “That the Lord your God may try you;” he says. And assuredly it is a great trial when one whom you believe to be a prophet, a disciple of prophets, a doctor and defender of the truth, whom you have folded to your breast with the utmost veneration and love, when such a one of a sudden secretly and furtively brings in noxious errors, which you can neither quickly detect, being held by the prestige of former authority, nor lightly think it right to condemn, being prevented by affection for your old master.
http://www.newadvent.org/fathers/3506.htm
One can follow The Novus Ordo Witch, judge the Pope and depose him all in one supercilious swop, OR, one can follow St. Vincent of Lerins.
For real men, there is no question-- it is NEVER permissible to become a sedevacantuist and flee the testing of The Lord in His Church. to do so is the action of a coward, a christian charlatan.
But did he really say these things?
@ Paul Morphy
Padraig,
If he didn't really say these things, who else said them instead?
And if he didn't really say these things, but is aware that someone is misrepresenting him, he can easily set the record straight by unequivocally rejecting what has been said in his name.
And if he didn't really say these things, why is he refusing to answer the 5 dubia?
No. The facts are that we have a Hireling, instead of a Pope.
We are to believe an atheist against a Pope on his own evidence alone on such serious charges?
The saints stayed silent when falsely charged so did Jesus, that did not mean we could adduce evidence of guilt.
It is reasonable to suppose someone innocent until proven guilty.
The Dubia have nothing at all to these specific allegations.
Padraig,
Pope Bergoglio himself as gone back repeatedly to interview with this man. He has said bragged about giving interviews like this. Nothing wills stop him. Because he keeps going back, he must approve.
You cannot compare this to saints or Our Blessed Lord remaining silent. First, Bergoglio goes back for more, second, we live in an age when communication is instant and one must learn to manage it. The fact is, if he did not say this, then he, or Greg Burke or Parolin, should be issuing a rebuke. If he did not say it, then their and his refusal to rebuke, creates scandal.
Logic leads us to then to the reality that 2 + 2 really does = 4 and only in the minds of modernists and heretics does it = 5.
Scalfari is his unofficial mouthpiece.
At this point, I would believe that -
"Who does this fella Jesus think He is, God?" could be a direct quote from the pope.
This is what I found in a 1P5 article:
https://onepeterfive.com/pope-speaking-plainly-communion-divorced-messy/
"An approach that naturally has “practical” repercussions in the area of direct indications for pastors and the ecclesial community. Archbishop Forte has in fact revealed a “behind the scenes” [moment] from the Synod: “If we speak explicitly about communion for the divorced and remarried,” said Archbishop Forte, reporting a joke of Pope Francis, “you do not know what a terrible mess we will make. So we won’t speak plainly, do it in a way that the premises are there, then I will draw out the conclusions.”
“Typical of a Jesuit,” Abp Forte joked, attributing to that suggestion a wisdom that has allowed the maturation necessary to conclude that Amoris Laetitia, as Abp. Bruno Forte explained, does not represent a new doctrine, but the “merciful application” of that [the doctrine] of all time."
Jorge Bergoglio WANTS to change the Church irreversibly. Before becoming pope he already promised a divorced and "remarried" family member to get her admission to Holy Communion. As pope he told a woman in the same situation in a phone conversation to find a priest who will give her Communion, when the priest in her parish refused it. The woman later bragged about it. Bergoglio confirmed that all the heretic's interpretation of AL and communion for the divorced is the ONLY correct one.
Why do you pretend to not know what he himself is saying and causing with his lies and manipulations?
I have the very gravest concerns about Pope Francis too. But second hand reports from a single dubious source are second hand reports from a single dubious source.
Please - not ANOTHER Mark Thomas !
Post a Comment