Friday, 20 March 2015

Homosexual activist says gay ‘marriage’ isn’t about equality, it’s about destroying marriage

With the continuing anti-family and anti-marriage agenda this is a good time to reexamine it from the perspective of those who undertake it. Notice at the one minute mark the nervous laugh after she says she has "three kids who have, um, five parents, more or less." It is her guilty conscience. Ms Gessen knows not only that the concept is absurd but that it is fundamentally against the natural and moral law.

After you read this, please consider making a donation to Patricia Jannuzzi, recently fired from Immaculata High School in New Jersey for stating the obvious. You might also consider making a comment on the page to challenge the haters that are lurking there. Below this reprint from LifeSiteNews is an advertisement out today to run on Sean Hannity about Patricia and the phone number for her bishop who has permitted this travesty of justice. It is from Michael Hitchborn of the Lepanto Institute which recently exposed the practices of CRS - Catholic Relief Services which are against Catholic teaching.

Can you Voxers get it over $25,000 by 12 noon EDT?

From LifeSiteNews, May 1, 2013.

May 1, 2013 ( – Conservative pundits are saying that a homosexual activist exposed the hidden agenda behind homosexual “marriage” when she told an audience last year that the movement is not seeking equality but rather a total dismantling of the institution of marriage itself. 

Masha Gessen, a journalist and author who campaigns for homosexual 'rights', made the comments last May in Australia on a panel at the Sydney Writer’s Festival. She said:
It’s a no-brainer that (homosexual activists) should have the right to marry, but I also think equally that it’s a no-brainer that the institution of marriage should not exist. …(F)ighting for gay marriage generally involves lying about what we are going to do with marriage when we get there — because we lie that the institution of marriage is not going to change, and that is a lie. 
The institution of marriage is going to change, and it should change. And again, I don’t think it should exist. And I don’t like taking part in creating fictions about my life. That’s sort of not what I had in mind when I came out thirty years ago. 
Providing her own life as an example for her advocacy to do away with marriage, Gessen described the complex family structure in which three children whom she parents live: one of them is adopted with her ex-partner, another - whom she birthed – has a biological father in Russia, and the third is the biological child of her current partner and Gessen’s brother. These three children have five adults in parenting roles, but not all five adults parent all three children.

“The five parents break down into two groups of three,” she said. “And really, I would like to live in a legal system that is capable of reflecting that reality, and I don’t think that’s compatible with the institution of marriage.” 

* * * 

1 comment:

Anonymous said...

Queering (i.e., destroying) marriage has been what it's all about from the beginning.

Case in point: Just before NYS legalized same sex marriage in June 2011, the head of the Gender and Sexuality Law Clinic at Columbia Law School blogged dismissively about how she had moved on from legalizing same sex marriage to focus on "queering marriage" i.e., defining a truly homosexual marriage arrangement. Her first assault? That pesky old fashioned and traditional non-queer "till death do us part" stuff.

Columbia Gender & Sexuality Clinic also aims its well-funded barrels at the sacred cow -- tradition, with a three year "engaging tradition" project whose stated purpose is "to help advocates understand and counter tradition-based objections to their work in promoting advancement on issues relating to sexuality, gender, and race." Here is the announcement of "Engaging Tradition":

It is all about queering. It has always been about queering. Queering is the destruction.

Nothing the activists do is