“A time is coming when men will go mad, and when they see someone who is not mad, they will attack him, saying, 'You are mad; you are not like us.” ― St. Antony the Great
Wednesday 19 July 2017
Destroying Christianity from within
Pretty smart for an atheist, eh?
Labels:
Crisis in the Church,
RockingMrE
Sunday 16 July 2017
Well, Holy Father, do you have more to tell us?
Pope Benedict XVI sent a message to be read at the Requiem of Cardinal Meisner.
What struck me particularly in the last conversations with the Cardinal, now gone home, was the natural cheerfulness, the inner peace and the assurance he had found. We know that it was hard for him, the passionate shepherd and pastor of souls, to leave his office, and this precisely at a time when the Church had a pressing need for shepherds who would oppose the dictatorship of the zeitgeist, fully resolved to act and think from a faith standpoint. Yet I have been all the more impressed that in this last period of his life he learned to let go, and live increasingly from the conviction that the Lord does not leave his Church, even if at times the ship is almost filled to the point of shipwreck.
Papa Joseph Ratzinger abandoned the ship. The rats on the ship will be running scared now that he has revealed his thoughts. Will his jailers let him get away with this statement, or will his, be the next, "Requiem."
There was a time in which I had great love and affection for this man. He was the grandfather I never knew, the father I missed, my favourite uncle now long gone.
It's time for the so-called, "Emeritus," to come clean with the rest of us about the reality in which we are now living.
Labels:
Crisis in the Church,
Pope Benedict
Saturday 15 July 2017
Me, and my buddy
Tony Blocked-By Spadaro, EssJay, and Luis lobbying-to-be-the-next Pope Tagle, enjoying some fun time together.
Nice bar boyz.
Who's apartment?
Where's Coco?
Labels:
Anthony Spadaro,
Cardinal Tagle,
Team Bergoglio
Friday 14 July 2017
Does the CCCB liturgy head, Father Terry Fournier, believe in Transubstantiation?
Do not sit out there and accuse this writer of "grave sin" because I reported what the priest interviewed should have corrected right after it appeared in the press. Did he not read it? Did he not see what the reporter wrote? Should he not have contracted the reporter to retract or clarify? Should he not have written here or responded to the email stating that he asked The Star for a correction or clarification?
How dare you sit in judgement of this writer.
Go ask the priest!
We have Monsignors using money from who knows where to buy cocaine for a sodomite orgy in the Vatican - a situation totally ignored by the secular press, but this is what they have spent a week reporting to discredit the Church for the few Celiac sufferers who cannot consume Blessed Sacrament under one species, even though the other is available.
Anyone who cannot receive Body of the Lord under the form of bread, can receive the Blood of Christ under what was wine, even a child and even at the traditional Latin Mass.
Look, if there is no gluten, then it is not wheat flour, it does not make bread and there is no confection of the Blessed Sacrament, no transubstantiation, period!
This is not a new instruction by the Church, it is simply a restatement of the facts for the reason that the abuse is occurring by errant priests and bishops and the result is that the Sacrament simply isn't!
Invalid matter does not make for a Sacrament!
The Toronto Star is a notorious and near-bankrupt rag of anti-Catholic bigotry and leftism and it has joined the parade. What the Star writes on the matter is not the point, it is who is interviewed and what is said that must be exposed to the Catholic faithful.
Andrea Adam, a rather poorly catechized Catholic mother has a child suffering from Celiac's disease. Mrs. Adam would not accept her parish priest's decision that gluten-free hosts would not be provided. The Toronto Star reporter states that "in the end, Adam took her daughter to Ottawa, where she was able to receive Holy Communion with a gluten-free host."
I've got news for Andrea Adam.
Your daughter was not, "able to receive Holy Communion." She received a substance made from non-wheat flour that was nothing more than that.
Did know priest ever tell the poor woman this?
Note that this was Ottawa, under the nose of Archbishop Terence Prendergast, S.J.!
Now, for more.
Terry Fournier is a priest of the Diocese of Sault Ste. Marie and is National Director of Office of Liturgy (English Sector) for the Canadian Conference of Catholic Bishops. Fournier is quoted in the Toronto Star article as follows:
Did you catch that?
"Symbolizes the blood of Christ."
The reporter does not place the phrase, which symbolizes the blood of Christ, in quotation marks.
Why is this? Did Father say, "don't quote me," with a wink, wink and a nudge, nudge? Is there a reason why the writer quotes him, but does not, at the same time?
I think Father Terry Fournier and Bishop Crosby, President of the Canadian Conference of Catholic Bishops, should confirm whether the Grand Pub-ha of the liturgical mess of the mass that occurs in Canada actually believes in Transubstantiation and the Real Presence, Body, Blood, Soul and Divinity of Our Lord Jesus Christ in the Eucharistic species under the appearance of bread and wine.
Yes, or no, Father Fournier, which is it?
Oh, and, Your Grace, what of that parish in Ottawa with the invalid matter?
Labels:
CCCB,
Eucharistic sacrilege,
Holy Eucharist,
Woe Canada
Vatican targets and insults faithful Catholics - The Unholy See
The gross insult to faithful, American (and many Canadians by extension) Catholics by Tony Spadaro is below. If one says that the Bishop of Rome did not know about it he surely does now.
In this screed, he also targets Michael Voris and the folks at ChurchMilitant. By extension, this Jesuit attacks individual Catholics, including those of us who blog and think along the same lines as Michael Voris which to me, is to think with the Church. The Church of my childhood, the Church of my parents, the Church of my Maronite ancestors.
We did not ask for this. We were living in peace until that March in 2013. We have continued, in spite of the insults, degradation and heretical statements of the Bishop of Rome to continue to remain loyal to the Our Lord Jesus Christ and His Church and the Rock of Peter and to do the work necessary and to which we have been called. In my case, it is the weekly chanting of the true and proper Mass in a community two hours from my home. A community growing, with many children, with an organist now ready to go on to Catholic college and her 12 year old sister preparing to take over playing 14 Gregorian Masses, five Creeds and more. My work continues in Toronto with the assistance and training for the proper and true Roman Mass. I will not be stopped. You must not be stopped.
This screed is a disgrace but it must be seen by all of us as a badge of honour.
Never, did I think, I would live to be insulted by the Bishop of Rome.
Rejouissance!
In this screed, he also targets Michael Voris and the folks at ChurchMilitant. By extension, this Jesuit attacks individual Catholics, including those of us who blog and think along the same lines as Michael Voris which to me, is to think with the Church. The Church of my childhood, the Church of my parents, the Church of my Maronite ancestors.
We did not ask for this. We were living in peace until that March in 2013. We have continued, in spite of the insults, degradation and heretical statements of the Bishop of Rome to continue to remain loyal to the Our Lord Jesus Christ and His Church and the Rock of Peter and to do the work necessary and to which we have been called. In my case, it is the weekly chanting of the true and proper Mass in a community two hours from my home. A community growing, with many children, with an organist now ready to go on to Catholic college and her 12 year old sister preparing to take over playing 14 Gregorian Masses, five Creeds and more. My work continues in Toronto with the assistance and training for the proper and true Roman Mass. I will not be stopped. You must not be stopped.
This screed is a disgrace but it must be seen by all of us as a badge of honour.
Never, did I think, I would live to be insulted by the Bishop of Rome.
Rejouissance!
Evangelical
Fundamentalism and Catholic Integralism in the USA: A surprising ecumenism
Antonio Spadaro S.J., Editor-in-chief of La CiviltÃ
Cattolica
Marcelo Figueroa, Presbyterian pastor, Editor-in-chief of
the Argentinean edition of L’Osservatore Romano
In God We Trust. This phrase is printed on the banknotes of
the United States of America and is the current national motto. It appeared for
the first time on a coin in 1864 but did not become official until Congress
passed a motion in 1956. A motto is important for a nation whose foundation was
rooted in religious motivations. For many it is a simple declaration of faith.
For others, it is the synthesis of a problematic fusion between religion and
state, faith and politics, religious values and economy.
Religion, political Manichaeism and a cult of the apocalypse
Religion has had a more incisive role in electoral processes
and government decisions over recent decades, especially in some US
governments. It offers a moral role for identifying what is good and what is
bad.
At times this mingling of politics, morals and religion has
taken on a Manichaean language that divides reality between absolute Good and
absolute Evil. In fact, after President George W. Bush spoke in his day about
challenging the “axis of evil” and stated it was the USA’s duty to “free the
world from evil” following the events of September 11, 2001. Today President Trump steers the fight
against a wider, generic collective entity of the “bad” or even the “very bad.”
Sometimes the tones used by his supporters in some campaigns take on meanings
that we could define as “epic.”
These stances are based on Christian-Evangelical
fundamentalist principles dating from the beginning of the 20th Century that
have been gradually radicalized. These have moved on from a rejection of all
that is mundane – as politics was considered – to bringing a strong and
determined religious-moral influence to bear on democratic processes and their
results.
The term “evangelical fundamentalist” can today be
assimilated to the “evangelical right” or “theoconservatism” and has its
origins in the years 1910-1915. In that period a South Californian millionaire,
Lyman Stewart, published the 12-volume work The Fundamentals. The author wanted
to respond to the threat of modernist ideas of the time. He summarized the
thought of authors whose doctrinal support he appreciated. He exemplified the
moral, social, collective and individual aspects of the evangelical faith. His
admirers include many politicians and even two recent presidents: Ronald Reagan
and George W. Bush.
The social-religious groups inspired by authors such as
Stewart consider the United States to be a nation blessed by God. And they do
not hesitate to base the economic growth of the country on a literal adherence
to the Bible. Over more recent years this current of thought has been fed by
the stigmatization of enemies who are often “demonized.”
The panorama of threats to their understanding of the
American way of life have included modernist spirits, the black civil rights
movement, the hippy movement, communism, feminist movements and so on. And now
in our day there are the migrants and the Muslims. To maintain conflict levels,
their biblical exegeses have evolved toward a decontextualized reading of the
Old Testament texts about the conquering and defense of the “promised land,”
rather than be guided by the incisive look, full of love, of Jesus in the
Gospels.
Within this narrative, whatever pushes toward conflict is
not off limits. It does not take into account the bond between capital and
profits and arms sales. Quite the opposite, often war itself is assimilated to
the heroic conquests of the “Lord of Hosts” of Gideon and David. In this
Manichaean vision, belligerence can acquire a theological justification and
there are pastors who seek a biblical foundation for it, using the scriptural
texts out of context.
Another interesting aspect is the relationship with creation
of these religious groups that are composed mainly of whites from the deep
American South. There is a sort of “anesthetic” with regard to ecological
disasters and problems generated by climate change. They profess “dominionism”
and consider ecologists as people who are against the Christian faith. They
place their own roots in a literalist understanding of the creation narratives
of the book of Genesis that put humanity in a position of “dominion” over
creation, while creation remains subject to human will in biblical submission.
In this theological vision, natural disasters, dramatic
climate change and the global ecological crisis are not only not perceived as
an alarm that should lead them to reconsider their dogmas, but they are seen as
the complete opposite: signs that confirm their non-allegorical understanding
of the final figures of the Book of Revelation and their apocalyptic hope in a
“new heaven and a new earth.”
Theirs is a prophetic formula: fight the threats to American
Christian values and prepare for the imminent justice of an Armageddon, a final
showdown between Good and Evil, between God and Satan. In this sense, every
process (be it of peace, dialogue, etc.) collapses before the needs of the end,
the final battle against the enemy. And the community of believers (faith)
becomes a community of combatants (fight). Such a unidirectional reading of the
biblical texts can anesthetize consciences or actively support the most
atrocious and dramatic portrayals of a world that is living beyond the
frontiers of its own “promised land.”
Pastor Rousas John Rushdoony (1916-2001) is the father of
so-called “Christian reconstructionism” (or “dominionist theology”) that had a
great influence on the theopolitical vision of Christian fundamentalism. This
is the doctrine that feeds political organizations and networks such as the
Council for National Policy and the thoughts of their exponents such as Steve
Bannon, currently chief strategist at the White House and supporter of an
apocalyptic geopolitics.[1]
“The first thing we have to do is give a voice to our
Churches,” some say. The real meaning of this type of expression is the desire
for some influence in the political and parliamentary sphere and in the
juridical and educational areas so that public norms can be subjected to
religious morals.
Rushdoony’s doctrine maintains a theocratic necessity:
submit the state to the Bible with a logic that is no different from the one
that inspires Islamic fundamentalism. At heart, the narrative of terror shapes
the world-views of jihadists and the new crusaders and is imbibed from wells
that are not too far apart. We must not forget that the theopolitics spread by
Isis is based on the same cult of an apocalypse that needs to be brought about
as soon as possible. So, it is not just accidental that George W. Bush was seen
as a “great crusader” by Osama bin Laden.
Theology of prosperity and the rhetoric of religious liberty
Together with political Manichaeism, another relevant
phenomenon is the passage from original puritan pietism, as expressed in Max
Weber’s The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism, to the “Theology of
Prosperity” that is mainly proposed in the media and by millionaire pastors and
missionary organizations with strong religious, social and political influence.
They proclaim a “Prosperity Gospel” for they believe God desires his followers
to be physically healthy, materially rich and personally happy.
It is easy to note how some messages of the electoral
campaign and their semiotics are full of references to evangelical
fundamentalism. For example, we see political leaders appearing triumphant with
a Bible in their hands.
Pastor Norman Vincent Peale (1898-1993) is an important
figure who inspired US Presidents such as Richard Nixon, Ronald Reagan and
Donald Trump. He officiated at the first wedding of the current president and
the funeral of his parents. He was a successful preacher. He sold millions of
copies of his book The Power of Positive Thinking (1952) that is full of
phrases such as “If you believe in something, you get it”, “Nothing will stop
you if you keep repeating: God is with me, who is against me” or “Keep in mind
your vision of success and success will come” and so on. Many prosperity
prosperous televangelists mix marketing, strategic direction and preaching,
concentrating more on personal success than on salvation or eternal life.
A third element, together with Manichaeism and the prosperity
gospel, is a particular form of proclamation of the defense of “religious
liberty.” The erosion of religious liberty is clearly a grave threat within a
spreading secularism. But we must avoid its defense coming in the
fundamentalist terms of a “religion in total freedom,” perceived as a direct
virtual challenge to the secularity of the state.
Fundamentalist ecumenism
Appealing to the values of fundamentalism, a strange form of
surprising ecumenism is developing between Evangelical fundamentalists and Catholic
Integralists brought together by the same desire for religious influence in the
political sphere.
Some who profess themselves to be Catholic express
themselves in ways that until recently were unknown in their tradition and
using tones much closer to Evangelicals. They are defined as value voters as
far as attracting electoral mass support is concerned. There is a well-defined
world of ecumenical convergence between sectors that are paradoxically
competitors when it comes to confessional belonging. This meeting over shared
objectives happens around such themes as abortion, same-sex marriage, religious
education in schools and other matters generally considered moral or tied to
values. Both Evangelical and Catholic Integralists condemn traditional ecumenism
and yet promote an ecumenism of conflict that unites them in the nostalgic
dream of a theocratic type of state.
However, the most dangerous prospect for this strange
ecumenism is attributable to its xenophobic and Islamophobic vision that wants
walls and purifying deportations. The word “ecumenism” transforms into a
paradox, into an “ecumenism of hate.” Intolerance is a celestial mark of
purism. Reductionism is the exegetical methodology. Ultra-literalism is its
hermeneutical key.
Clearly there is an enormous difference between these
concepts and the ecumenism employed by Pope Francis with various Christian
bodies and other religious confessions. His is an ecumenism that moves under
the urge of inclusion, peace, encounter and bridges. This presence of opposing
ecumenisms – and their contrasting perceptions of the faith and visions of the
world where religions have irreconcilable roles – is perhaps the least known
and most dramatic aspect of the spread of Integralist fundamentalism. Here we
can understand why the pontiff is so committed to working against “walls” and
any kind of “war of religion.”
The temptation of “spiritual war”
The religious element should never be confused with the
political one. Confusing spiritual power with temporal power means subjecting
one to the other. An evident aspect of Pope Francis’ geopolitics rests in not
giving theological room to the power to impose oneself or to find an internal
or external enemy to fight. There is a need to flee the temptation to project
divinity on political power that then uses it for its own ends. Francis empties
from within the narrative of sectarian millenarianism and dominionism that is
preparing the apocalypse and the “final clash.”[2] Underlining mercy as a
fundamental attribute of God expresses this radically Christian need.
Francis wants to break the organic link between culture,
politics, institution and Church. Spirituality cannot tie itself to governments
or military pacts for it is at the service of all men and women. Religions
cannot consider some people as sworn enemies nor others as eternal friends.
Religion should not become the guarantor of the dominant classes. Yet it is
this very dynamic with a spurious theological flavor that tries to impose its
own law and logic in the political sphere.
There is a shocking rhetoric used, for example, by the
writers of Church Militant, a successful US-based digital platform that is
openly in favor of a political ultraconservatism and uses Christian symbols to
impose itself. This abuse is called “authentic Christianity.” And to show its
own preferences, it has created a close analogy between Donald Trump and
Emperor Constantine, and between Hilary Clinton and Diocletian. The American
elections in this perspective were seen as a “spiritual war.”[3]
This warlike and militant approach seems most attractive and
evocative to a certain public, especially given that the victory of Constantine
– it was presumed impossible for him to beat Maxentius and the Roman
establishment – had to be attributed to a divine intervention: in hoc signo
vinces.
Church Militant asks if Trump’s victory can be attributed to
the prayers of Americans. The response suggested is affirmative. The indirect
missioning for President Trump is clear: he has to follow through on the
consequences. This is a very direct message that then wants to condition the
presidency by framing it as a divine election. In hoc signo vinces. Indeed.
Today, more than ever, power needs to be removed from its
faded confessional dress, from its armor, its rusty breastplate. The
fundamentalist theopolitical plan is to set up a kingdom of the divinity here
and now. And that divinity is obviously the projection of the power that has
been built. This vision generates the ideology of conquest.
The theopolitical plan that is truly Christian would be
eschatological, that is it applies to the future and orients current history
toward the Kingdom of God, a kingdom of justice and peace. This vision
generates a process of integration that unfolds with a diplomacy that crowns no
one as a “man of Providence.”
And this is why the diplomacy of the Holy See wants to
establish direct and fluid relations with the superpowers, without entering
into pre-constituted networks of alliances and influence. In this sphere, the
pope does not want to say who is right or who is wrong for he knows that at the
root of conflicts there is always a fight for power. So, there is no need to
imagine a taking of sides for moral reasons, much worse for spiritual ones.
Francis radically rejects the idea of activating a Kingdom
of God on earth as was at the basis of the Holy Roman Empire and similar
political and institutional forms, including at the level of a “party.”
Understood this way, the “elected people” would enter a complicated political
and religious web that would make them forget they are at the service of the
world, placing them in opposition to those who are different, those who do not
belong, that is the “enemy.”
So, then the Christian roots of a people are never to be
understood in an ethnic way. The notions of roots and identity do not have the
same content for a Catholic as for a neo-Pagan. Triumphalist, arrogant and
vindictive ethnicism is actually the opposite of Christianity. The pope on May
9 in an interview with the French dailyLa Croix, said: “Yes Europe has
Christian roots. Christianity has the duty of watering them, but in a spirit of
service as in the washing of feet. The duty of Christianity for Europe is that
of service.” And again: “The contribution of Christianity to a culture is that
of Christ washing the feet, or the service and the gift of life. There is no
room for colonialism.”
Against fear
Which feeling underlies the persuasive temptation for a
spurious alliance between politics and religious fundamentalism? It is fear of
the breakup of a constructed order and the fear of chaos. Indeed, it functions
that way thanks to the chaos perceived. The political strategy for success
becomes that of raising the tones of the conflictual, exaggerating disorder,
agitating the souls of the people by painting worrying scenarios beyond any
realism.
Religion at this point becomes a guarantor of order and a
political part would incarnate its needs. The appeal to the apocalypse
justifies the power desired by a god or colluded in with a god. And fundamentalism
thereby shows itself not to be the product of a religious experience but a poor
and abusive perversion of it.
This is why Francis is carrying forward a systematic
counter-narration with respect to the narrative of fear. There is a need to
fight against the manipulation of this season of anxiety and insecurity. Again,
Francis is courageous here and gives no theological-political legitimacy to
terrorists, avoiding any reduction of Islam to Islamic terrorism. Nor does he
give it to those who postulate and want a “holy war” or to build barrier-fences
crowned with barbed wire. The only crown that counts for the Christian is the
one with thorns that Christ wore on high.[4]
FOOTNOTES
[1] Bannon believes in the apocalyptic vision that William
Strauss and Neil Howe theorized in their book The Fourth Turning: What Cycles
of History Tell Us About America’s Next Rendezvous with Destiny. See also N.
Howe, “Where did Steve Bannon get his worldview? From my book”, in The
Washington Post, February 24, 2017.
[2] See A. Aresu, “Pope Francis against the Apocalypse”, in
Macrogeo(www.macrogeo.global/analysis/pope-francis-against-the-apocalypse),
June 9, 2017.
[3] See “Donald ‘Constantine’ Trump? Could Heaven be
intervening directly in the election?”, in Church Militant (www.churchmilitant.com/video/episode/vortex-donald-constantine-trump).
[4] For further reflection see D. J. Fares, “L’antropologia
politica di Papa Francesco», in Civ. Catt. 2014 I 345-360; A. Spadaro, “La
diplomazia di Francesco. La misericordia come processo politico”, ib 2016 I
209-226; D. J. Fares, “Papa Francesco e la politica”, ib 2016 I 373-385; J. L.
Narvaja, “La crisi di ogni politica cristiana. Erich Przywara e l’‘idea di
Europa’”, ib 2016 I 437-448; Id., “Il significato della politica internazionale
di Francesco”, ib 2017 III 8-15.
Thursday 13 July 2017
Liars, filthy perverted and corrupt Churchmen
Surely, we are to give the benefit of the doubt to someone who states that something said against him or something attributed to him is untrue, is denied by him.
Surely.
Surely.
Yet; I find myself believing Steve Skojec and Maike Hickson more than Greg Burke, parroting the instruction of his boss, who acts like a tinpot South American despot and the Cardinal that had not courage to stand up to the despot and now finds himself on the outside.
I am to give the benefit of the doubt to these men. Yet, I find it near impossible.
A Bishop of Rome, not a Holy Father, who denies the miracle of the loaves and fishes, that the real miracle was "sharing." Yes, "Pope" Bergoglio said this, look it up.
A so-called "Pope" who delights in insulting the folk traditions of simple and faithful Catholics such as spiritual bouquets, calling them "rosary counters." Gosh, we could go on but there is not enough time in this post because truly, "time is greater than space," to write it all down.
A so-called "Pope" who delights in insulting the folk traditions of simple and faithful Catholics such as spiritual bouquets, calling them "rosary counters." Gosh, we could go on but there is not enough time in this post because truly, "time is greater than space," to write it all down.
What filthy scoundrels.
Cocaine parties. Sodomite orgies. Financial corruption. Priests such as James Martin, endangering souls by praising the homosexualist culture with impunity and without correction.
We are to believe these filthy, perverted, corrupt churchmen?
Like hell.
Like hell.
Labels:
Crisis in the Church
Tuesday 11 July 2017
The Five Questions for Cardinal Muller - and the rest of us!
The story is based upon anonymous sources in Germany. Hickson, fluent in German, frequently writes on German matters and through German contacts. While this is not evidenciary and would in a court be considered, hearsay, and; one could say that it is in the realm of "fake news," given the pattern of this "papacy" and the continuing revelations of sodomy, drugs and orgies along with financial corruption in the Vatican, can it be discounted?
Muller was summoned to a meeting with Pope Bergoglio, expecting a normal business agenda. He was presented verbally with five questions, as follows:
According to this report, Cardinal Müller was called to the Apostolic Palace on 30 June, and he thus went there with his working files, assuming that this meeting would be a usual working session. The pope told him, however, that he only had five questions for him:
- Are you in favor of, or against, a female diaconate? “I am against it,” responded Cardinal Müller.
- Are you in favor of, or against, the repeal of celibacy? “Of course I am against it,” the cardinal responded.
- Are you in favor of, or against female priests? “I am very decisively against it,” replied Cardinal Müller.
- Are you willing to defend Amoris Laetitia? “As far as it is possible for me,” the Prefect of the Congregation for the Faith replied: “there still exist ambiguities.”
- Are you willing to retract your complaint concerning the dismissal of three of your own employees? Cardinal Müller responded: “Holy Father, these were good, unblemished men whom I now lack, and it was not correct to dismiss them over my head, shortly before Christmas, so that they had to clear their offices by 28 December. I am missing them now.”
Thereupon the pope answered: “Good. Cardinal Müller, I only wanted to let you know that I will not extend your mandate [i.e., beyond 2 July] as the Prefect of the Congregation for the Faith.” Without any farewell or explanation, the pope left the room. Cardinal Müller at first thought that the pope left in order to fetch a token of gratitude, and thus he waited patiently. But, there was no such gift, nor even an expression of gratitude for his service. The Prefect of the Papal Household, Archbishop Georg Gänswein, then had to explain to him that the meeting was over, and that it was time for him to leave.
At the time of this writing, we have not been able to obtain confirmation of these events from Cardinal Müller, nor from his secretary, to whom we reached out for comment. Similarly, we requested a comment from Greg Burke at the Vatican Press Office, but as of press time, we have received no response.
If this report is true – and, given the sources, we have little reason to doubt it – we can well imagine why Cardinal Meisner would have been distressed after hearing about this meeting in the hours before his death. Did these five questions with their yes or no answers, if indeed they were asked of Cardinal Müller, constitute a sort of reverse dubia? Were the Cardinal’s responses, insofar as they were in accordance with orthodox Catholic thought, the reason he was not asked to continue in his role as Prefect of the CDF? Of the five questions, three (female diaconate, priestly celibacy, and the promotion of Amoris Laetitia) have been widely discussed as part of the pope’s “reform” agenda. (It seems worthy of mention in this regard that Archbishop Luis Francisco Ladaria Ferrer, S.J., who has been tapped as Müller’s replacement as CDF Prefect, was appointed last year as President of the Commission for the Study of the Diaconate of Women.) But is the female priesthood really expected to be reviewed in relation to the female diaconate, even though Pope Francis has already personally affirmed the understanding that Pope John Paul II ruled definitively against the possibility? And what of the final alleged question — the one pertaining to the pope’s dismissal of three priests from the CDF last year without cause? If such a question were asked, was it merely a test of unquestioning obedience? Recall that the pope’s reported answer, when asked by Cardinal Müller about the dismissal of these three priests, was simply to say, “I am the pope, I do not need to give reasons for any of my decisions. I have decided that they have to leave and they have to leave.”
The whole article can be read at:
Clearly, there is a massive fight in the curia. There are Catholics there who fear for what is happening under this Bishop of Rome, I will not state, this "Holy Father." It is time for them to come clean and state unequivocally the facts and to stand behind it with their identities.
It is time for Cardinal Muller to disclose all before Christ and the Catholic faithful.
There is nothing more than the souls of millions of Catholics at stake, to say nothing of those Jews, Muslims, Hindus, Atheists and Protestants who will never now salvation because the Church of Man has taken over the Church of Christ and called him a liar.
There is one liar, from the beginning and there are those in the Church who do his bidding.
Now, to those five questions.
How do you answer?
Monday 10 July 2017
The end of Summorum Pontificum?
There are rumours in French Catholic media, that according to a "friend" of the Bishop of Rome, Jorge Bergoglio, once the SSPX is reunited, and if Benedict XVI is dead, he will abolish Summorum Pontificum.
My thoughts.
If this is true, then it is one more reason for the SSPX to say, "no."
They are already Catholic. There is no schism and there never was. So, let's put that silly argument to rest right now.
What I will state is this.
If he does, he is the Son of Satan and the mask will be off.
It is no more simple than that.
My thoughts.
If this is true, then it is one more reason for the SSPX to say, "no."
They are already Catholic. There is no schism and there never was. So, let's put that silly argument to rest right now.
What I will state is this.
If he does, he is the Son of Satan and the mask will be off.
It is no more simple than that.
Labels:
Francis of Rome,
Summorum Pontificum
New Bergoglian CDF Prefect Ferrer implicated in paedophile priest cover-up!
So, as long as he is not a priest, he is not the Church's responsibility?
Another scandal, this time, the new Jesuit Prefect Luis Laderia Ferrer who, together with Cardinal William Levada, laicised a child-molester priest and did not tell the police. That defrocked pervert priest later went on to rape 8 boys.
The Church is in a crisis of filth and perversion. Where are the Cardinals and Bishops who will call this out and demand full disclosure and accountability?
Enough!
http://wolnosc24.pl/2017/07/04/kolejna-seks-afera-w-watykanie-tym-razem-zamieszany-jest-w-nia-zaufany-czlowiek-papieza/
Another scandal, this time, the new Jesuit Prefect Luis Laderia Ferrer who, together with Cardinal William Levada, laicised a child-molester priest and did not tell the police. That defrocked pervert priest later went on to rape 8 boys.
The Church is in a crisis of filth and perversion. Where are the Cardinals and Bishops who will call this out and demand full disclosure and accountability?
Enough!
Another sex scandal at the Vatican! This time it involved a confidante of Pope
http://wolnosc24.pl/2017/07/04/kolejna-seks-afera-w-watykanie-tym-razem-zamieszany-jest-w-nia-zaufany-czlowiek-papieza/
Not a week
passed, and the Vatican has already shaken the third turn-sex scandal. This
time he is involved in a confidant of Pope Francis, Jesuit Luis Ladaria Ferrer,
appointed Prefect of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith in just
last Sunday.
Recall -
last Thursday treasurer of the Vatican, Australian Cardinal George Pell, has
been formally accused of committing a sexual assault against dzieci.Kardynał
Pell, who was prefect of the Secretariat. Economics, which is equivalent to the
finance minister in the Vatican, the personality number three in the Catholic
Church and the highest in the history of the Vatican dignitary, who has been
accused in connection with the scandal concerning sexual abuse among the
clergy.
Not yet
faded echo of the scandal, and the Holy See rocked again. They tried to hide it
for a few months, but the case is issued. It was important for the secretary of
Cardinal, one of the closest collaborators of the Pope. Secretary of the organized
gay party building above Sant'Uffizio (Holy Office), the Congregation for the
Doctrine of the Faith, where he is also taking cocaine. Moved
"criminally" to the monastery at Monte Cassino he got there again in
another sex scandal.
Read: Again
unprecedented scandal at the Vatican! Cocaine and gay party in the Holy Office
and the monastery at Monte Cassino. Is Pope Francis stand it?
The head of
that secretary-homoseksulaisty and drug addict was Cardinal Gerhard Ludwig
Mueller z Niemiec, prefect of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith,
which Pope Francis dismissed last Saturday. The new prefect was the Spanish
Jesuit and Archbishop Luis Francisco Ladaria Ferrer. Now it turns out, however,
that he may be involved in a pedophile scandal.
"There
had been two days of the decision of Pope Francis to change the position of
Prefect of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, and already dark
clouds hung over the head of his successor, Jesuit Luis Ferrer Ladarii" -
writes on Facebook Jacek Pałasiński, long-press correspondent in Rome.
Newspaper,
la Repubblica "L'Espresso article was published, the new prefect conceal
one of the most notorious pedophile scandals in Italy. The authors describe a
case of a pedophile priest Gianni Troty that, the decision was Archbishop
Ferrer and his then-supervisor - b. Prefect of the Congregation for the
Doctrine of the Faith Williama Levady, was sentenced in 2012. The maximum
sentence provided for the code of canon, ie. The dismissal from the clerical
state .
Unfortunately
- adds a journalist - was accompanied by judgment note, according to which,
information about the judgment and reasons for leaving Father. Troty of the
priests and the Order of the Little Works of Divine Providence, had not spread.
Unless b. Trota priest again commits lewd acts on children.
"I
obediently silent church structures, the Italian investigative authorities have
not been notified, precisely because of the decision of Archbishop. Ferrera.
And, unfortunately, Father. Trota again committed. He remained in the same
small town as a coach ... children's football teams, boyish and girlish. The
parents knew nothing about his past. Approx. ten boys and ten girls again was
molested by him. Only in 2015. As a result of accusations of one of the boys
parents b. Fr.. Trota was arrested last year and sentenced to 8 years in prison
for molesting one of the boys. Soon they have to start another process for
another rape. "In practice - write Fittipaldi and Foschini - destroyed an
entire generation inhabitants of this town" - writes Pałasiński.
How to
react to this information now Pope Francis? And if the Pope Francis will cope
with the task of cleaning the church?
Sunday 9 July 2017
"Pope" Bergoglio confirms himself as a globalist, one world government proponent! Not a word of Christ!
How long have evangelicals and others spoken of the formation of a "United States of Europe," as the Beast of the Apocalypse controlled by the Antichrist. How often did they call Rome, meaning the Catholic Church, the Whore of Babylon?
It's too bad that this Bishop of Rome, this "Pope" won't dialogue and encounter with his Cardinals on the doctrine of the faith at least as often as he meets with the atheist Eugenio Scalfari and the Masonic mouthpiece known as La Repubblica.
He is promoting the antithesis of subsidiarity. It is evil.
Not a word of Christ.
Read it. You decide what we are dealing with.
It's too bad that this Bishop of Rome, this "Pope" won't dialogue and encounter with his Cardinals on the doctrine of the faith at least as often as he meets with the atheist Eugenio Scalfari and the Masonic mouthpiece known as La Repubblica.
He is promoting the antithesis of subsidiarity. It is evil.
Not a word of Christ.
Read it. You decide what we are dealing with.
Francesco Scalfari interview: "My plea to the G20 on migrants'
Last Thursday I received a phone call from Pope Francis. It was about noon and I was at the paper with my phone rang and a voice greeted me: it was His Holiness. I recognized him immediately. “Could you come over today? At 4?” I’ll be there for sure.
I dashed home and at 3:44 I was in the little sitting room at Santa Marta. The Pope came in a minute later. We embraced and then, seated facing each other, we started to swap idea, feelings, analyses of what is going on in the Church and then in the world.
Pope Francis told me that he was very worried about the summit meeting of the G20. “I’m afraid that there will be very dangerous alliances between Powers that have distorted visions of the world: America and Russia, China and North Korea, Russia and Assad in the war in Syria.” What is the danger of these alliances, Holiness? “The danger regarding immigration. We, you know this well, have as the principle problem and, unfortunately growing in the today’s world, that of poverty, of the weak, of the excluded, of whom emigrants are members. On the other hand there are countries where the majority of the poor don’t come from migratory streams but from social calamities of that country; others, instead, have little local poverty but they fear the invasion of migrants. That’s why the G20 worries me.”
Do you think, Holiness, that in global society as that in which we live the mobility of peoples is on the upswing, poor or not poor as they may be? “Let’s not fool ourselves: poor peoples have an attraction the continents and countries of old wealth. Above all Europe. I, too, have often thought about this problem and I have arrived at the conclusion that, not only for but also for this reason, Europe must assume as soon as possible a federal government and a federal parliament, not from individual confederated countries. You yourself have raised this topic many times, and have even spoken of it in the European parliament. It’s true, I’ve raised this many times.” And you received great applause and even standing ovations. “Yes, that’s so, but unfortunately that doesn’t mean much. They will do that if they figure out the truth: either Europe becomes a federal community or it won’t count for anything in the world.”
...
I have often written that Francis is a revolutionary. Think of beatifying Pascal, thinks the poor and immigrants, it calls for a federated Europe, and - last but not least - puts me in the car with his arms.
A pope like this we never had.
Labels:
More Bergoglian heresy,
The Antichrist
Saturday 8 July 2017
Bergoglio "didn't mind" stopping Cardinal Müller from Offering the Holy Mass to lobby him for one of "his friends"
In an absolutely scandalous display of sacrilege and hubris, Jorge Bergoglio, in the middle of 2013 demanded that Cardinal Muller cease the offering of Holy Mass, even if it be the Novus Ordo, to attend to him in the sacristy.
Marco Tossati in First Things, reports:
Marco Tossati in First Things, reports:
https://www.firstthings.com/web-exclusives/2017/07/the-good-soldier
I suspect that Cardinal Müller is upset about his dismissal, but in a sense may see his own beheading as a liberation. To write this article, I peeped into the confidential notes I had made during the last four years regarding the German cardinal and his relations with the reigning pontiff. The notes are the result of many private conversations with high-ranking people in the Vatican who enjoyed the cardinal’s friendship. It appears that Müller experienced life under Bergoglio as a sort of Calvary. This, despite Müller’s statements—he has been a good soldier to the end, and even beyond.
The first step of Müller’s Calvary was a disconcerting episode in the middle of 2013. The cardinal was celebrating Mass in the church attached to the congregation palace, for a group of German students and scholars. His secretary joined him at the altar: “The pope wants to speak to you.” “Did you tell him I am celebrating Mass?” asked Müller. “Yes,” said the secretary, “but he says he does not mind—he wants to talk to you all the same.” The cardinal went to the sacristy. The pope, in a very bad mood, gave him some orders and a dossier concerning one of his friends, a cardinal. (This is a very delicate matter. I have sought an explanation of this incident from the official channels. Until the explanation comes, if it ever comes, I cannot give further details.) Obviously, MÅ«ller was flabbergasted.
Muller should have been more than flabbergasted and his answer to send with this secretary back to this Bergoglio is clear, "when the Mass is ended!"
Cardinal Muller, it is time to man up.
What blasphemy.
What sacriledge.
Bishops, Cardinals, you will be held accountable for your silence.
Labels:
Bergoglian Blasphemy,
Cardinal Muller,
Pope Francis
Say hello to the new Bergoglian Bishop of Milan
Courtesy of Hilary White, say hello to the new Archbishop of Milan.
The Novus Ordo is an irredeemable abomination.
Get out of it. Get away from priests and bishops that promote this kind of blasphemy.
The Church of Man is in free-fall and the rot of Vatican II has infected the whole tree. The filth of priests and bishops is now reaching its zenith.
They will fall, they will be struck down and they will burn in Hell, if they do not repent and do public penance and reparation.
May it be soon.
The Novus Ordo is an irredeemable abomination.
Get out of it. Get away from priests and bishops that promote this kind of blasphemy.
The Church of Man is in free-fall and the rot of Vatican II has infected the whole tree. The filth of priests and bishops is now reaching its zenith.
They will fall, they will be struck down and they will burn in Hell, if they do not repent and do public penance and reparation.
May it be soon.
Labels:
Milan,
Team Bergoglio
Friday 7 July 2017
Happy Summorum Pontificum Day
On this anniversary of Summorum Pontificum, I say thank you to Pope Benedict XVI, ingloriously reigning as Holy Father and Pontiff from his prison in the Vatican garden under the watchful eye of his two-faced, double-agent, Prison Warden, Ganswein, doing the bidding of the great impostor and his band of merry-minions.
I also restate advice to the SSPX. Just say, "No!"
Look, I don't accept much of the bovine excrement in the documents of Vatican II and I despise the manner in which the deficient and unjustified, abomination of a Mass of the Missal of Paul VI, no blessed or saint in my view, is celebrated, when even done well.
So, ya gonna kick me out, George?
The SSPX is Catholic, always was and, please God, will be.
They need to sign nothing.
If you can come up with any positive developments in the Church and the spread of the faith arising out of the Second Vatican Council, feel free to post a comment on what those might be...
Pfft to a Rome quickly becoming what Jack Chick proffered.
The Whore of Babylon!
I also restate advice to the SSPX. Just say, "No!"
Look, I don't accept much of the bovine excrement in the documents of Vatican II and I despise the manner in which the deficient and unjustified, abomination of a Mass of the Missal of Paul VI, no blessed or saint in my view, is celebrated, when even done well.
So, ya gonna kick me out, George?
The SSPX is Catholic, always was and, please God, will be.
They need to sign nothing.
If you can come up with any positive developments in the Church and the spread of the faith arising out of the Second Vatican Council, feel free to post a comment on what those might be...
Pfft to a Rome quickly becoming what Jack Chick proffered.
The Whore of Babylon!
Labels:
SSPX,
Summorum Pontificum
Wednesday 5 July 2017
Ontario Court of Appeal to hear case of Christian father
Take a click and visit Every Day for Life Canada. An Orthodox Greek Christian father refused his rights to remove his children from indoctrination of the state's new religion.
We are in a fight in Canada. The secularist state and homosexualist lobby pushes us more and more into silence. Dr Tourloukis is fighting a battle on behalf of many.
Please visit the link below and give what you can to the fight!
http://everydayforlifecanada.blogspot.ca/2017/06/ontario-court-of-appeal-hears-case-for.html?view=classic
Yesterday, June 26th, Dr. Steve Tourloukis, the courageous Hamilton father was before the Ontario Court of Appeal to defend his parental rights against the Hamilton-Wentworth District School Board. Does the state have the power to overrule parental rights and legally force "inclusive" education in taxpayer funded public schools? The just and right answer is no. True inclusion must welcome those who oppose. Every parent in Ontario and in Canada has the natural and God given right to direct the education of their children.
We are in a fight in Canada. The secularist state and homosexualist lobby pushes us more and more into silence. Dr Tourloukis is fighting a battle on behalf of many.
Please visit the link below and give what you can to the fight!
http://everydayforlifecanada.blogspot.ca/2017/06/ontario-court-of-appeal-hears-case-for.html?view=classic
Yesterday, June 26th, Dr. Steve Tourloukis, the courageous Hamilton father was before the Ontario Court of Appeal to defend his parental rights against the Hamilton-Wentworth District School Board. Does the state have the power to overrule parental rights and legally force "inclusive" education in taxpayer funded public schools? The just and right answer is no. True inclusion must welcome those who oppose. Every parent in Ontario and in Canada has the natural and God given right to direct the education of their children.
Labels:
Ontario Liberals
Tuesday 4 July 2017
Letter from Müller to Bishop Fellay and the Society of St. Pius X - Just say "No!"
To those bishops and priests of the Society of St. Pius X,
Just say no.
That is all.
Vox.
Just say no.
That is all.
Vox.
From www.medias-presse.info comes the following
excerpt of a letter from Cardinal Müller to Bishop Bernard Fellay. According to
www.medias-presse.info, Cardinal Müller's letter was communicated to all SSPX
members by the SSPX General House.
Excerpt from Cardinal Müller's letter:
“As you know, Pope Francis has many a time
manifested his benevolence towards your Priestly Society, granting, in
particular, to all priest members the faculty of confessing the faithful
validly and by authorizing local Ordinaries to grant licences for the
celebration of the marriages of the faithful who follow the pastoral activity
in your Society. Furthermore, discussions are continuing concerning questions
relative to the full re-establishment of the communion of your Society with the
Catholic Church.
In relation to this, with the approbation of
the Sovereign Pontiff, I judged it necessary to submit to the Ordinary Session
of our Congregation (which met on May 10 last) the text of the doctrinal
Declaration which was transmitted to you during the meeting of June 13 2016, as
the necessary condition in view of the full re-establishment of communion. Here
are the unanimous decisions of all the members of our Dicastery in this regard:
1) It is necessary to require the adhesion of
the members of the Priestly Society of Saint Pius X to the new formula of the
Professio Fidei dating from 1988 (c.f. annexe). Consequently, it is not
sufficient to ask them to express the Professio Fidei of 1962.
2) The new text of the doctrinal Declaration
must contain a paragraph in which the signatories declare in an explicit manner
their acceptance of the teachings of the Second Vatican Council and those of
the post-conciliar period, by granting to said doctrinal affirmations the
degree of adhesion which is due to them.
3) The members of the Priestly Society of Saint
Pius X must recognize not only the validity, but also the legitimacy of the
Rite of the Holy Mass and of the Sacraments, according to the liturgical books
promulgated after the Second Vatican Council.”
www.medias-presse.info adds that Cardinal
Müller concluded the letter saying that “during the Audience granted to the
Cardinal Prefect on May 20 2017, the Sovereign Pontiff approved these
decisions”. The French website also adds that in his accompanying letter to
SSPX priests, Father Christian Thouvenot, Secretary General of the SSPX, recalled
the words of Bishop Fellay after the meeting of the major superiors in Anzère,
Switzerland, on June 28 2016:
“The Society of Saint Pius X does not seek
primarily a canonical recognition, to which it has a right because it is
Catholic. The solution is not simply juridical. It pertains to a doctrinal
position which it is imperative to manifest [...] Divine Providence will not
abandon Its Church whose head is the Pope, Vicar of Jesus Christ. That is why
an incontestable sign of this restoration will reside in the signified will of
the Sovereign Pontiff to grant the means for re-establishing the order of the
Priesthood, the Faith and Tradition – a sign which will be, furthermore, the
guarantor of the necessary unity of the family of Tradition”.
Published in Fetzen Fliegen
Labels:
SSPX
Monday 3 July 2017
Pope runs from bad image of his sodomite mural Cardinal in baby Charlie Gard matter. And where is the Queen in all of this?
Little Charlie Gard is suffering at the hands of the corrupt British state and his failed Monarch, Elizabeth II, who should be stepping in to save this child.
Magna Carta my foot!
Though the parents have raised enough money to take little Charlie to America for treatment, the corrupted system of Britain refused, even to the point of demanding the child be removed from life support and not allowed to go home to die in the presence of his parents.
http://www.dailywire.com/news/18182/pontifical-academy-life-releases-chilling-frank-camp
Into this wades the head of the Pontifical Academy for Life, butchered by Francis, -- headed by the Cardinal who commissioned a sodomite orgy mural for his Cathedral.
But good old Francis couldn't take the furor caused by this Paglia and has reversed the Vatican's position.
A disgrace!
The "Vatican," I won't say the Catholic Church, - the Vatican, supporting the European Fascist Union and British Health Care over parents rights.
And now, Donald J. Trump, the President of the United States has offered to help little Charlie in America.
The Pope looks very bad.
The Queen, looks worse!
Magna Carta my foot!
Though the parents have raised enough money to take little Charlie to America for treatment, the corrupted system of Britain refused, even to the point of demanding the child be removed from life support and not allowed to go home to die in the presence of his parents.
http://www.dailywire.com/news/18182/pontifical-academy-life-releases-chilling-frank-camp
Into this wades the head of the Pontifical Academy for Life, butchered by Francis, -- headed by the Cardinal who commissioned a sodomite orgy mural for his Cathedral.
But good old Francis couldn't take the furor caused by this Paglia and has reversed the Vatican's position.
A disgrace!
The "Vatican," I won't say the Catholic Church, - the Vatican, supporting the European Fascist Union and British Health Care over parents rights.
And now, Donald J. Trump, the President of the United States has offered to help little Charlie in America.
The Pope looks very bad.
The Queen, looks worse!
Labels:
Donald J. Trump,
England,
Pope Francis
BREAKING: Vatican officials covered up "bag" of cocaine induced homosexual orgy!
From Pudelek.pl
The cesspool of sodomy in the Vatican continues. Pudelek.pl is reporting that the news breaking last week of the Vatican Monsignor caught in a drug-laced, booze-saturated, homosexual orgy in the Vatican actually occurred two months ago!
http://www.pudelek.pl/artykul/113104/kolejna_kompromitacja_w_watykanie_bliski_wspolpracownik_papieza_urzadzal_gejowskie_orgie_pod_wplywem_kokainy/#
Someone in the Vatican has been engaged in a cover-up.
Has the removal of Mueller been engineered as a distraction?
Has Cardinal Pell (to possible spurious accusations, but if true, throw the book at him) been sacrificed to cause a diversion from the real, current actives sinful cesspool of filth, evil, corruption and sleaze that is the Vatican?
Parents, would you let your sons and daughters travel to Rome to in any way participate in the Youth Synod with these filthy monsters around? Do you think World Youth Day is any safer?
(With sincere apologies to my priest friends, but I would not advise anyone to leave any child alone with any priest, to protect them from the perverts and good priests from false accusations!)
Francis owes our Lord Jesus Christ and His suffering faithful a complete clean-out of the sodomite mafia from the Church and accountability from these thieves and perverts who have stolen from the faithful for their drugs and orgies.
Enough of this cover-up!
The cesspool of sodomy in the Vatican continues. Pudelek.pl is reporting that the news breaking last week of the Vatican Monsignor caught in a drug-laced, booze-saturated, homosexual orgy in the Vatican actually occurred two months ago!
http://www.pudelek.pl/artykul/113104/kolejna_kompromitacja_w_watykanie_bliski_wspolpracownik_papieza_urzadzal_gejowskie_orgie_pod_wplywem_kokainy/#
Someone in the Vatican has been engaged in a cover-up.
Has the removal of Mueller been engineered as a distraction?
Has Cardinal Pell (to possible spurious accusations, but if true, throw the book at him) been sacrificed to cause a diversion from the real, current actives sinful cesspool of filth, evil, corruption and sleaze that is the Vatican?
Parents, would you let your sons and daughters travel to Rome to in any way participate in the Youth Synod with these filthy monsters around? Do you think World Youth Day is any safer?
(With sincere apologies to my priest friends, but I would not advise anyone to leave any child alone with any priest, to protect them from the perverts and good priests from false accusations!)
Francis owes our Lord Jesus Christ and His suffering faithful a complete clean-out of the sodomite mafia from the Church and accountability from these thieves and perverts who have stolen from the faithful for their drugs and orgies.
Enough of this cover-up!
Vatican Gendarmerie dealings discovered two months ago, when the search was made in the building of the Vatican Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith. In the apartment of one of the secretary Very Important Monsignorów found a bag of cocaine. Arrested priest admitted that he was taking the drug during a homosexual orgy, which he organized in the premises curial. Since then they attempted to place the matter under the carpet in many ways. Initially a secretary, instead of in prison, placed in rehab in one of Rome's clinics, where with the help of prayer had to leave the addiction. Soon, however, through the intercession of Cardinal he moved to the Order of Monte Cassino - the same in which several months ago was arrested the abbot Pietro Vitorelli'egowho embezzled half a million euros from the proceeds to charity. The abbot seemed no abandon the so-called fortune. sex tourism, mainly seeking gay brothel in South America.
Because the health secretary-drug addict in the law significantly deteriorated again placed him in the hospital. Then the matter leaked to the media. The most frequently asked question is, how is it possible that until two months managed to hide everything even before the Pope.
Sunday 2 July 2017
Say hello to Boy-Toy Capozzi
Well, well, well.
Happy Sunday boys and girls.
And what do we have here?
If it isn't Msgr. Luigi Felching Capozzi, drunken, drugged up sodomite disturbing the otherwise serene and quiet Vatican owned apartment and former headquarters of the CDF.
Source:
https://gloria.tv/article/AFec2dUBFNCC1twG9TbC89pzv
This cockroach, Capozzi, infiltrated the holy priesthood of Our Lord Jesus Christ and should never have been ordained.
https://gloria.tv/article/QJgkoWSAgYPe6J2qJoCbtgzg1
Who was his superior? Whom was he secretary to?
Why only the effervescent Cardinal Coco-Puffs - Coccopalmerio.
Souce:
http://whatisupwiththesynod.com/index.php/2017/06/30/we-have-a-winnah/
Oh, he was putting forward the Felching Priest as bishop material. (look up that word at your own risk, you have been warned)
Who are you to judge?
The "Sweet Christ on Earth," according to St. Catherine of Sienna.
That's who!
Happy Sunday boys and girls.
And what do we have here?
If it isn't Msgr. Luigi Felching Capozzi, drunken, drugged up sodomite disturbing the otherwise serene and quiet Vatican owned apartment and former headquarters of the CDF.
Source:
https://gloria.tv/article/AFec2dUBFNCC1twG9TbC89pzv
This cockroach, Capozzi, infiltrated the holy priesthood of Our Lord Jesus Christ and should never have been ordained.
https://gloria.tv/article/QJgkoWSAgYPe6J2qJoCbtgzg1
Who was his superior? Whom was he secretary to?
Why only the effervescent Cardinal Coco-Puffs - Coccopalmerio.
Souce:
http://whatisupwiththesynod.com/index.php/2017/06/30/we-have-a-winnah/
Oh, he was putting forward the Felching Priest as bishop material. (look up that word at your own risk, you have been warned)
Inquiring minds want to know.
Was Mons. Battista Mario Salvatore, Not to be Judged Ricca, caught with his own boy-toy in Uruguay and now head of the so-called Pope's No-Tell, Hoe-Tell and the Vatican Bank, there for the big party?
Take your pick:
https://www.google.ca/search?q=monsignor+ricca+uruguay&oq=msgr+ricca+uru&aqs=chrome.1.69i57j0.6598j0j4&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8
Take your pick:
https://www.google.ca/search?q=monsignor+ricca+uruguay&oq=msgr+ricca+uru&aqs=chrome.1.69i57j0.6598j0j4&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8
So where is the Bergomeister in all of this?
Who are you to judge?
The "Sweet Christ on Earth," according to St. Catherine of Sienna.
That's who!
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)