I want to vomit.
Now, take a good look above at the video.
The Bergoglian mafia member, Austen Ivereigh states that this is St. Elizabeth and the Blessed Mother, What a stinking filthy perverted mind this moronic imbecile has.
The Bergoglian mafia member, Austen Ivereigh states that this is St. Elizabeth and the Blessed Mother, What a stinking filthy perverted mind this moronic imbecile has.
And just who is the one with the boner?
Update: Some are now saying it is an arm.
It's a boner.
Update: Some are now saying it is an arm.
It's a boner.
Look at the left arm. Now, even a lousy artist/carver would not put arms that disproportionate.
It's Johnson!
32 comments:
Why? If we know that he with all other deceived Satan's minions represents nothing more than the anti-church, the counter-church, the ape-church.
The line between this and the only one true Church of our Lord is very thick and visible for all.
So we know at which side we are standing. And for which Church we are fighting.
God bless you!
Ivan
It's like a bad joke, that a Catholic Pope is engaging in this on the grounds of the Vatican is a disgrace not just to Catholics but to Christians of all denominations, and other religions who view it as idolatry.
I am actually more angry at those Bishops, Cardinals, Priests who say nothing; do nothing. At Mass tomorrow, I am convinced, our Priest will say nothing about this. He will pray for Pope Francis’ intentions. All is normal. Nothing changed.
This abomination of desolation occurs in the Vatican, Pope and highest Cardinals present as participants, and Cardinal Burke, Bishop Schneider on down to every last Catholic in the Hierarchy, most Catholics in the pews ... say, do, nothing.
And to me that means agreement; participation in the sin. We are a Church that worships demons and false gods, Moloch. And not a peep of protest or action from any emasculated man in the hierarchy.
Vox
These freaks are into tumescent things. I guess it arouses them.
If that's an "arm," then the elbow is well below the waist.
First of all, he isnt Catholic. He has more than showed the world time and time again that he does not hold the Catholic Faith. And since he does not hold the Catholic Faith, it impossible that he can be the leader of the Catholic Church since one must be a member to be its leader.
Welcome to the Novus Ordo modernist church. Did you actually think you would find Catholicism in a conciliar church???
Aqua, that's perhaps the worst part. I agree with you, we will go to Holy Mass tomorrow and chances are our priest will say nothing. It will be business as usual. What kind of psychological torture is it when the unimaginable takes place in front of your eyes and yet you are required to proceed on as if nothing has changed. Surely there is a name for it.
This ritual is pagan, demonic, and those poor people are left ignorant by intention. They cling to the demonic idols of their ancestors because no one has evangelized them, taught them the Gospel. All the money to support priests in the Amazon and they are encouraged to stay pagan. Why convert?
THE CHURCH NO LONGER TEACHES OR BELIEVES IN THE SACRIFICIAL DEATH OF CHRIST FOR OUR SOULS AND THE REDEMPTIVE POWER OF THAT SACRIFICE, AND MORE THAN THAT, IS REJECTING CHRIST AND EMBRACING DEMON PRACTICES AND GODS.
So we know this, okay, but what about the souls, the millions of Catholics, who do not? What of them? Who will evangelize them to...this church?? I cannot. Can you?
Bergolio is an apostate, a demon, a devil. A cunning devil, he theatrically "puts aside his prepared remarks" and prays the Our Father at this pagan put-on. He is using theater to once again act as if he "didn't know". And fools fall for it.
It's all perfect in a disgusting way. Our "leader" of the known homosexual mob that infests our Vatican presides over a pagan ritual where a little carved idol has a big, old erection. That would be funny if it weren't so tragic.
Watched a video on you tube recently, about violence and corruption in S. Africa,. It was stated that shamens and medicine men tell hiv infected men they can be cured by having sex with a virgin, they hang around outside schools and lure girls, some as young as six. So the Vatican is giving approval to these practices. It's not all singing to plants and flowers, there's a dark disturbing undercurrent to some of these native religions.
This sort of apostasy has happened before during the period of the renaissance in Rome. What were the reactions? The Reformation and the sack of Rome in 1527. Of course the resulting Counter Reformation and the Council of Trent reinvigorated Catholicism.
As a medicine against the present confusion reading theology and devotional writings from the Gothic Age can be beneficial. Catholics of an intellectual disposition will find the writings of St Thomas Aquinas very useful, and his contemporary, St Bonaventure is also uplifting and he writes in a more accessible style.
Thank you Trad101. That's good advice.
I was just educated about the little idols on the blanket and also blessed by Francis at the pagan party.
This was by "Thomas Aquinas" I believe, on Twitter.
The larger pregnant idol is Yacy, the Moon Goddess, who can self-generate, she does not need a male to do so.
The smaller pregnant idol is the goddess Yuda, the goddess of "love", who copulates when Guaracy, the male idol.
Guaracy, the male idol, is the god of the Sun. (and that's NOT an arm, that's his phallus. Austin Ivereigh LIED. Imagine that.)
This is pure paganism. Our pope, presided, participated in, and blessed, a purely pagan ritual where false gods were worshipped.
This is PAGANISM. Anyone who believes for a second he "did not read his prepared remarks" because he was "caught off guard" has not been paying attention for the last 6 years. This is his go-to modus operandi.
Enough. He is an apostate. We need an imperfect COUNCIL.
Please God, help us, help the church. Our Lady of Fatima, pray for us, amen.
The comment by Austen Ivereigh is almost worse to me then the pagan idol worship. For a person who is supposed to be Catholic to declare that these naked statues are representative of the Blessed Virgin Mary, the Mother of God and our Holy Mother, and Saint Elizabeth, the mother of Saint John the Baptist is reprehensible
My response to this is I am not returning to my local Parish.
I am now SSPX. It is a long drive. It is a small Parish and our family is large with special needs. I will do anything and everything possible to remain Catholic which means I am done with Novus Ordo which produced this dual headed Papacy and this devil worshiping Bishop of Rome.
I did not sign up for that. The Mass of Ages and Unbroken Tradition - that.
Not only Idolatry but Sacrelige, descecrating the ground where the first Christians gave their lifes, and shed their blood, before they would bow down to idol's. When God decides to clean His house, it will be horrendous.
"Arm." Yeah, right. *scoffs*
Birth of Antichrist
The Basilica of Nursia lay in ruins on 30 * X 2016 on the feast of Our Lord Jesus Christ the King, as established by Pope Pius XI, the Polish bishop (as he personally described his ecclesiastical dignity). The only thing left of the temple was the facade, that the guts of the Church, the holy Catholic faith, had already been ripped out by the infernal enemy.
Rome will lose faith ... - The Blessed Virgin prophesied this in La Salette in 1846, but then, at the time of Bl. Pius IX, church freemasonry feverishly worked to ridicule Her messages and make a madwoman with Melanie Calvat.They have done their job: the Saletynian Fathers claim to this day that this is a false prophecy, although the course of events in the Vatican shows their authenticity.
... and become the seat of the Antichrist. It happened: the false prophet Jorge the Apostate, participating, on October 4th, in a pagan ritual, tenderly embraced a figurine of a pregnant false Hebrew nun, who on the lawn in the Vatican Gardens gave birth to an incarnate Satan: this wooden boy without a pampers on a blanket. We will soon find out his identity: he is an elderly man, because his grandmother was born on September 29th,1896(!).
It happened on feast of Saint Francis of Assisi, to whom the Lord Jesus entrusted with an unimaginably difficult task: "Rebuild my Church." And what was to be done, the Poverello (in this context the nickname as the most adequate)? At Christmas AD1223 he erected a rocky manger in Greccio (Lazio). For whom? After all, Jesus Christ the Savior was born 1223 years earlier. So who is this hard cradle for? For the another Comforter, the Paraclete, the Anointed of God who will fight and defeat Antichrist with the breath of his mouth. Where did he come from? Our Mother the Holy Church will give birth to him in the midst of persecution that has never happened before and will not be there later.
October 7th, the feast of Our Lady of the Rosary
* Vigil to Saint Quentin, Martyr - The Eldest Daughter of the Church, i.e. France, still counts and together with the 'Fifth' ('Quintus') will again light up the darkness of the world.
On the bottom of the Vatican news page there is the entire insulting sacriligious video of this so-called event. If you have an iron stomach, it is worth watching.
At 6:42 it zooms in on the visitation scene and the nearby boner guy on the picnic blanket.
Gift Time: At 12:55 one of the circlers tries to put what looks like a ring on Bergoglio's finger but can't get past F's resistance. Remember that group that was trying to kiss PF's hand and the amused look on his face as he kept pulling his hand away? At 13:38 he receives another naked pregnant wooden statue with a red spiral thing in her womb. He quickly hands it off.
What follows at 13:52 is a successful attempt to put a necklace of rat bones? on the holy one. Later on around 16:55 when the circling ones are leaving, the poop is fingering it to remove it.
After almost two hours of tree hugging, dirt worship and idolatry, it looked like PF could hardly wait to get out of there. The garden party proved unsustainable even for indigenous Francis. In true Francis-style, he went silent, put on his best puss, ignored his prepared comments, and walked off as briskly as he could.
DisturbedMary
[21] And this was the occasion of deceiving human life: for men serving either their affection, or their kings, gave the incommunicable name to stones and wood. [22] And it was not enough for them to err about the knowledge of God, but whereas they lived in a great war of ignorance, they call so many and so great evils peace. [23] For either they sacrifice their own children, or use hidden sacrifices, or keep watches full of madness, [24] So that now they neither keep life, nor marriage undefiled, but one killeth another through envy, or grieveth him by adultery: [25] And all things are mingled together, blood, murder, theft and dissimulation, corruption and unfaithfulness, tumults and perjury, disquieting of the good,
[26] Forgetfulness of God, defiling of souls, changing of nature, disorder in marriage, and the irregularity of adultery and uncleanness. [27] For the worship of abominable idols is the cause, and the beginning and end of all evil. [28] For either they are mad when they are merry: or they prophesy lies, or they live unjustly, or easily forswear themselves. [29] For whilst they trust in idols, which are without life, though they swear amiss, they look not to be hurt. [30] But for two things they shall be justly punished, because they have thought not well of God, giving heed to idols, and have sworn unjustly, in guile despising justice.
[31] For it is not the power of them, by whom they swear, but the just vengeance of sinners always punisheth the transgression of the unjust.
(Book of Wisdom, chapter 14)
Ivan
According to St. Thomas Aquinas on Twitter:
The large pregnant woman is the Amazon moon goddess idol Yacy, who self-generates.
The smaller pregnant woman is the goddess of love, the idol Ruda, who copulates with Guaracy, the male idol on the blanket who is happy to see her.
The pope presided at this demon worship, then blessed the idols and the ceremony. He is an idol worshipper, among other things.
Dear Aqua, You are getting there. First step - out of the novus bogus. Great! Now to the SSPX who recognize heretic bergoglio as the Vicar of Christ? Now to deny and refute Catholic doctrine that an heretic cannot be Pope? Now to offer the Blessed Sacrament in union - as one with - this maligne satanist? Now to deny that the Holy See has never contained error? Now to deny the infallibility and indefectibility of the Catholic Church? Now to sift the teachings of your new Pope? Now to strive for union with bergoglio and the novus bogus? Well, if you succeed you'll be back where you started! Bad move!
@Peter Lamb: and your solution to Catholic Truth is what? What is a poor Catholic convert with spiritual mouths to feed to do?
I see no other possibility.
Aqua,
I am going to give you the answer.
You go to Mass offered by the Society of St. Pius X. I know what some Society priests think in private to me. It is what we all think. If they mention "Francis" in the Mass, it is not a sin. It is certainly not their sin. Francis, as far as we can know, IS THE POPE IN LAW, and, the Law is an ass. See, two things contradictory can indeed be true at the same time.
Go to the SSPX and never, ever look back.
Peter, do the same. The priest "in union" with Francis, is not his sin.
GO TO MASS.
Dear Aqua,
Do what real Catholics do - become a sedevacantist. Sede is the only true and faithful Catholic option. bergoglio is NOT the Pope in the law, or in any other way. He is an heretic imposter. His church is not the Catholic Church. The SSPX holds a most peculiar and original pope sifting ecclesiology which is NOT Catholic. Their orders are valid, but so may be those of priests who offer the black mass.
Sedes are straight arrow Catholics who live the Faith without any distortions, novelties, or cocomania - the Faith of our Fathers unadulterated.
So, what can you do?
1. Stay away from novus bogus and SSPX.
2. Join a sede parish - in the flesh should you be so fortunate, or virtually.
3. Get a Mass DVD and watch daily - following moving parts in your missal.
4. Daily Rosary. (5 decades.)
5. Read Catholic literature - before 1950.
6. Plenty of blogs and discussion groups.
We have to face reality. If their is no Priest, there is no Priest. We stay Faithful. We do our best. We remain patient. We confidently await Our Ladies victory without any deviations, or novelties and we shun heretics and heresies. We comfort and reassure each other in the meantime. We ask St.Athanasius, Bishop John Fisher and Sir Thomas Moore to pray for us that we receive the grace to remain faithful Catholics under any and all circumstances.
Thank you Vox. A voice out there that I trust. I am doing and will do as you say.
And thank you Peter Lamb. I will consider what you say carefully, as if my soul depends on it, which it does. I am being very careful these days. Very, very careful.
Dear Aqua,
I had exactly the same approach as you are taking in being very careful. Very rightly so, because we are putting our souls on these decisions. After my novus bogus Damascus moment, I read day and night for 18 months before I was utterly and completely convinced and confident in becoming a sede. God bless you in your search. :)
Peter, that is a point that must be reiterated. It is not enough to go to Mass, say rosaries, and frequent the blog sites. It takes lots and lots of research and reading. Eighteen months sounds about right. I feel like it took me the equivalent of earning a Masters Degree in Sacred Theology before I was ready to confidently become a sede. If the salvation of your soul is paramount, you will be driven with zeal to learn as much as you can about theology, history, ecclesiology, and canon law. The truth of the Church and the Faith is out there, it takes a lot of work right now to see past the lies that have been propagated since Luther and especially since Vatican II. It just takes work.
To Aqua
I too have struggled on this issue. In fact that struggle started around 1970. I have over those years, read, in and out, up and down, here and there and everywhere. You should keep in mind that there are some serious disagreements among the Sedevacantist cells. There is a Sedevacantist chapel not far from my home. This church uses the revised Holy Week promulgated in 1955. I guess that makes it a 3/4 traddie chapel, whereas I and this blog owner would, at best, be slurred as quasi-trads. Some Sedes reject the ordination tree from that of Archbishop Thuc. One Sede group will deny Holy Communion to those Sedes from a Thuc chapel. Imagine that one Sede group denying Holy Communion to other Sedes. WOW!!! I attend, weekly, an Una Cum Mass (where the Pope's name is mentioned in the Canon). According to one Sede group, in doing so, I commit a mortal sin. Daily I visit some Sedevacantist web sites. The defense of the Apostolic continuum, that brought us into the second half of the 20th century, is, for the most part, outstanding. Unfortunately, this is often accompanied by a savage trashing of any "traditionalist" (especially a sedeplenist) who does not share its modus operandi when confronting the nightmare that is contemporary Catholicism. This spitting cobra approach damages greatly the traditionalist cause and makes it about as attractive as a turd in a punch bowl. So, in closing, I would echo the advise given by Vox. Right now I am re-reading some Sede literature. The clarity on matters of faith and morals is refreshing. Such clarity you will not find in conciliar Catholicism. If you do read some of this Sede material do so, with caution, and be sure to wear some goggles.
Brian, thank you.
Peter Lamb, your postings are informative and deep and helpful and you are always welcome here. I can't hold the sedevacantist position that every pope since John XXIII is false. If Cardinal Siri was elected he should have taken the Seat or accepted martyrdom. To me, that defines that he was not elected, or did not accept being elected. At the same time, I have my doubts about the validity of Benedict's resignation and the whole conclave that elected this monster, Bergoglio.
I am 1005 certain that Bergoglio will be formally declared an Antipope. But even those who were in the past are still considered as popes while they were.
Protestants, Novus Ordo apologisits and Sedevacantists take the Vatican I too literally on the matters of papal infallibility, elevating him to god like status that everything emanating is as if he farts frankincense.
AQUA - attend the SSPX. If Francis is a fraud, and I suspect he is, it is not a mortal sin for the priest to name him or you to attend because it is not his sin or yours.
Go, and don't look back. We'll all be joining you there at some point.
David (Vox)
Dear Brian,
Enter the human factor. You are correct in much that you say. There is no ordinary jurisdiction at present. It is this essential element which ensures and maintains discipline and unity during normal times. Independent groups are operating under jurisdiction supplied by the Church. The shepherd is struck; the sheep are scattered. This very sad bikkering, egomania, jealousy and plain nastiness between groups emanates from fallen human nature and pride. It is unpleasant and usually stupid, but it is not essentially important to the validity of the sede response to our current situation. The correct Catholic response to any particular situation is to be found clearly enunciated in Holy Scripture, Sacred Tradition, or in the teachings of the Magisterium. Nasty, or silly people cannot prevent us from practicing the Faith if we use the guides at our disposal. The Thuc line is perfectly valid. Forget the groups and squabbles - look at the response. It is pure unadulterated Catholicism unchanged in any way from the Faith as our Fathers knew it. We neither add, nor subtract one iota from the infallible, indefectible Catholic Faith of all time until the end of the world. How can that possibly be wrong?
My very dear friend, Miles Christi, if all those quotes can't convince you that an heretic can't be Pope - then nothing ever will. :)
P.S. And remember satan does not tempt and hammer unrepentant sinners - he has them already. The judeo-masons are in his pocket. He especially temps Priests, Religious and holy laymen whose souls he would dearly like to acquire. In the present he would like sede Priests best of all and so he will tempt them viciously. They will get special treatment for sure!
Great blog. Great comments. Very helpful little corner.
Vox: ps, I do agree with you on SSPX. I find PLamb’s comments interesting but not persuasive.
I am completely repulsed by the NovusOrdo. Gross, it needs explanation. I stand with Arbp LeFebvre on this topic.
Post a Comment