From Roberto De Mattei as reported at Rorate Caeli.
Firstly: if Scalfari, when speaking with the Pope distorts
his words, why does the Pope continue to
talk to him and at any rate treat him with deference as a serious and
trustworthy journalist?
Secondly: it’s not enough to say that Scalfari’s words
“cannot be considered a faithful account” of his conversation with the Pope. It
has to be said that it was an absolutely false account, which overturns the
Pope’s thought, deforms his words by making him say things contrary to what he
thinks.
Thirdly: what does it mean that Scalfari’s words “represent, rather, a
personal free interpretation of what he heard”? A personal and free
interpretation?
Read the rest at: https://rorate-caeli.blogspot.com/2019/10/de-mattei-but-does-pope-believe-in.html#more
6 comments:
If someone said about you, Vox, for all the world to hear, that you do not believe in the divinity of Jesus Christ, what would you do?
What does it say about the treacherous Argentinian that he hasn't done this yet and never will?
The problems surrounding Bergoglio having to do with Christ's divinity and the Eucharist all make me wonder:
Was it just a coincidence that it was in Bergoglio's archdiocese that a Eucharistic miracle occurred in 1996?
The miracle strikes me as a message from God possibly meant for Bergoglio himself, the message being that, indeed, Christ is divine and the Eucharist truly is Christ.
He needs to clarify it. He owes that to us, and we need to insist he clarify this matter. What seems likely is it is well understood in Jesuit circles this is a common idea, that Christ was not divine. It is of course also likely that this being the case, scores of fellow Jesuits as well as others know this is his belief set. While I find it hard to believe the man has scruples and does not want to say something he does not believe (doubtful), it is possible he does not want to be contradicted by someone who knows the truth, if he states something false. Not to mention he's far too cunning, and realizes he would be excommunicating himself and providing something to latch on to for an imperfect council.
This is a sticky wicket for him, if the pressure mounts for him to clarify it. Hey, I still think he should clarify why a pope would bless a false idol and preside at a pagan ceremony.
He isnt Catholic. He isnt going to respond. Stop expecting him to act like a Catholic Pope. He is an heretic. When you start expecting him to act like an heretic you will never be disappointed in what he says or does. It is only when you expect him to act like a Catholic Pope that you will be gravely disappointed.
Silence itself is a form of an answer. I want to believe that he will answer, but the prolonged delay and his track record indicate otherwise.
Goodness, we are in terrible times, aren't we? All the more reason to cling to Christ and His Mother.
Bergoglio hates Christ. He reviles Him, in fact.
What's worse, none of the "leaders" of the Church do anything.
Sodomites, pedophiles and effeminate weaklings, and that includes Sarah, Schneider, Burke and Ratzinger.
Post a Comment