Monday, 18 May 2015

Timothy Radcliffe's heresy and vulgarity on his "eucharistic sodomy" is not new - Was Pope Francis aware of it or not?

Barona at Toronto Catholic Witness sent me this link to an article by Randy Engel on St. Peter' Damian's Book of Gomorrah. The original article was published in 2002 in Catholic Family News. Here is the relevant excerpt on Timothy Radcliffe, O.P., just appointed as a Consultor to the Vatican by the Pope. 

The rest of the article along with Part I deserves to be read and studied in its entirely.

As for the Pope and this appointment, we can assume one of the following:


  1. In a most charitable way, the Pope knows little English and may no little about what has gone on for a decades with dissident priests outside of Argentina. Someone may have put Radcliffe's name before him and he agreed, in which case he should promptly remove his advisers.
  2. The Pope knew exactly who Radcliffe is and this is another along with Msgr. Ricca and the Archbishop in Chile where he does not care about the past in the "who am I to judge" line.
  3. The Pope actually supports the view of Radcliffe and is doing it intentionally to change the Church, as his ghostwriter recently said, in which case we have a very big problem.

Is the Bishop of Rome aware that this man referred to sodomy as being "eucharistic?"




Homosexuality in Religious Life Today: The Dominican Model 

By way of comparing the views of St. Peter Damian on the vice of sodomy in clerical and monastic ranks with the modern post-Vatican II view on homosexuality, I have selected a Lenten Letter titled, "The Promise of Life," by Father Timothy Radcliffe. [73]  Radcliffe, the Master of the Dominican Order, issued his message on February 25, Ash Wednesday 1998. The English-born aristocrat was elected in 1992 to serve a nine-year term and was residing at the Santa Sabina priory at Rome, when the letter was issued and subsequently posted on the Vatican's web site, which is where I first read it.
In light of the major homosexual scandals that have plagued the priesthood and religious life worldwide, I was interested to see if Father Radcliffe would discuss the issue of homosexuality in Dominican ranks. He did - both directly and indirectly.
The first indirect reference to homosexuality was Radcliffe's quoting of American Dominican and writer Donald Goergen, OP on the subject of celibacy. The quote reads: "Celibacy does not witness to anything. But celibates do. We witness to the Kingdom if we are seen to be people whose chastity liberates us for life." [74]
My first thought when I read the Goergen quote was, why, of all the Dominicans he could have chosen to quote on celibacy, did Radcliffe choose a man whose personal and private life has been distinguished by an open and long-term advocacy and financial support of clerical homosexuality.
Father Goergen, who is currently living with the "Friends of God," a Hindu-styled Dominican Ashram in Kenosha, Wisconsin, began his early claim to infamy with the publication of his book The Sexual Celibate in 1974. [75]
Based on notes from lectures given to Dominican seminarians, Goergen's homosexual apologia speaks of "healthy homosexuality," promotes the homosexual "continuum" theories of the predatory homosexual and bisexual Alfred Kinsey, decries the "disease" of "homophobia," defines homosexuality according to the Gay Manifesto as "the capacity to love someone of the same sex," holds the door open for homosexual 'unions' by stating that, "genital activity should be the expression of a permanent relationship which involves fidelity," states that "so-called traditional Christian attitudes towards homosexuality are beginning to change," claims that "homosexuality can exist in healthy, Christian and graced forms," defends masturbation as being a genital activity that is "not bad, not unhealthy, not harmful, not immoral, even for a celibate," and then gives the sodomical coup de grace by attacking the perpetual virginity of Our Lady. [76]
Goergen's connections to the homosexual network in the Church go back many years. In Rev. Enrique T. Rueda's 1982 classic expose, The Homosexual Network, Goergen gets three dishonorable mentions for his advocacy of homosexuality. [77] He was also an early financial supporter of Communication Ministry, Inc., "an underground 'ministry' for lesbian nuns and gay clergy and religious." [78]
Soon after his election in 1985 as Provincial Superior to the St. Albert the Great Central Province, Goergen, a devotee of Teilhard de Chardin [OLW note: Chardin was condemned by the Church], began his search and destroy operation against many of the faithful and nationally outstanding Dominicans in St. Albert the Great Province including Father Charles Fiore, Father John O'Connor and the traditionalist Dominicans teaching at Fenwick High School. The River Forest Priory was transformed into a homosexual 'safe house' for other clerical perverts. [79]
This action is in stark contrast to the protection the young turk Goergen offered to the notorious Father Matthew "Creation Spirituality" Fox, champion of "lust," "sexual mysticism," and homosexuality as "the first gift of the Cosmic Christ". [80] In 1988, when the Holy See finally insisted that Fox be removed and silenced in order to finally halt the spread of his errors, Fox received an all expense one-year sabbatical during which he continued his heretical tirades. [81] Even after Fox left the Dominican Order and the Church to become an Episcopal 'priest' in California, Goergen continued to defend Fox's heterodox views on faith and morals.
So again I ask, why would Radcliffe quote Goergen on any subject, most especially clerical celibacy?
The answer I believe lies in the second of Goergen's quotes, cited by Radcliffe in "The Promise of Life" in which Goergen espouses the familiar litany of the Left, almost identical to that espoused by Fox:
"If I partake of consumer society, defend capitalism, tolerate machismo, believe that Western society is superior to others, and am sexually abstinent, I am simply witnessing to that for which we stand: capitalism, sexism, Western arrogance, and sexual abstinence. The latter is hardly deeply meaningful and understandably questioned." [82]
For many bishops and religious superiors like Radcliffe, a seminarian's or priest's homosexual activities and advocacy can be overlooked as long as the offending priest adheres to the gospel of Liberalism. It is not until a diocese or religious order is hit with catastrophic lawsuits related to the criminal sex abuse of underage young boys and young men, including seminarians and religious novices, by homosexual clerics, that the former have a second thought about the policy of accepting and ordaining homosexuals to the priesthood and religious life.

Radcliffe on Homosexual Clerics and the Homosexual "Sub-Culture" 

However, in the case of Radcliffe, it appears that the pressure of pederast lawsuits against offending Dominicans worldwide had not yet reached critical mass in 1998. Indeed, in the paragraph titled "Communities of Hope," just preceding his statement on the acceptance of homosexual candidates into the Order, the Master General insists that, "Our communities must be places in which there is no accusation, '... the accuser of our brethren is cast forth ...' "(Apoc. 12.10) [83]  Positioned at it is, just before his support for homosexual candidates and homosexual members of the Order, one might easily interpret his comment as a warning against in-house 'whistle- blowers' who reveal clerical sexual misconduct and criminal acts by their fellow Dominicans to their superiors or to public authorities and law enforcement officers.
Getting to the specific issue of "Community and Sexual Orientation," the Master General begins with the statement that various cultures react differently to "the admission of people of homosexual orientation to religious life," with some holding it to be "virtually unthinkable," while others accept it "without question." [84]
Frankly, outside of ancient cultures that practice certain pagan rites or followed certain gnostic doctrines, I have not run across any peoples that accept "without question" men who unnaturally lust after other men - whatever their role in the community. But even if such a culture existed in modern times, its beliefs should not matter a hill of beans to the universal head of the Dominican Order whose sole concern, one would think, would be what Christ, His Saints (including St. Dominic) and His Church teaches on the matter of homosexuality. And that teaching is clear - from the time of the Apostles - for a man to lust after and desire another man is perverse and acting on that unnatural desire and lust is an abomination in the eyes of God.
In any case, Radcliffe tells his fellow Dominicans not to worry about the matter of sexual orientation. "It is not for us to tell God whom He may or may not call to religious life," he states. And besides, he adds, the General Chapter of Caleruega, after much debate, affirmed that "the same demands of chastity apply to all brethren of whatever sexual orientation, and so no one can be excluded on this ground". [85]
The actual text from the Acts of the General Chapter of Diffinitors of the Order of Friars Preachers meeting from July 17-August 8, 1995 at Caleruega, Spain (the birthplace of St. Dominic) reads:
"Ö as a radical demand, the vow of chastity is equally binding on homosexuals and heterosexuals. Hence, no sexual orientation is a priori incompatible with the call to chastity and the fraternal life." (emphasis added) [86] 
[Note: The above reference to "no sexual orientation" is an extremely sophisticated turn-of- words that leaves the door open for lesbianism, transvestitism, transsexualism, pederasty, pedophilia, sado/masochism and other sexual perversions. The fact that the worldwide Dominican leadership permitted such a statement to be incorporated into an official pronouncement of the Order demonstrates in a concrete manner the degree to which the Dominicans are now controlled by the homosexualists and their minions.]
Radcliffe concludes his segment on "sexual orientation" with words of compassion for his Dominican homosexual brethren, but he warns the emergence "of any subgroups within a community, based on sexual orientation, would be highly divisive," and "threaten the unity of the community," and "make it harder for the brethren to practice the chastity that he has vowed". [87]

14 comments:

Anonymous said...

I studied last year with the Jesuits and Basilians in Toronto, and most of them are very openly gay among themselves and their friends. Nobody seemed the least bit bothered by this. Despite being engaged, I was often invited to the gay mass at the Jesuit church. It seems that these two groups (and probably others like the Dominicans) are almost entirely comprised of gays. I would raise an eyebrow if my son ever said he had a vocation to the monastery.

Anonymous said...

"Note: The above reference to "no sexual orientation" is an extremely sophisticated turn-of- words that leaves the door open for lesbianism, transvestitism, transsexualism, pederasty, pedophilia, sado/masochism and other sexual perversions."

You forgot "bestiality" which is now permitted in the U.S. Military!

Anonymous said...

Anon @10:43 am: "I would raise an eyebrow if my son ever said he had a vocation to the monastery."

I guess you have been reading Crux:
"In a move sure to raise eyebrows among the Church’s traditional guard"

http://www.cruxnow.com/church/2015/05/16/controversial-theologian-timothy-radcliffe-given-vatican-role/

I wonder what Jesus would say about "raising eyebrows" being a resonse to EVIL. Maybe Nestorian heresy was defeated so easily because the sheep walked out, i.e. refused to congregate with evil. Does raising your eyebrows qualify as raising your child in the Roman Catholic faith -- presumably what you vowed to do before God when you got the child baptized.

Carla Nieto said...

Thank you very much Vox for listing different possible scenarios of what went wrong here. I believe all of them are a big problem (the last would be disastrous). Whatever the reason for what's going on, it is a big problem because it's ongoing. Like I said before I want to believe the Pope is just uninformed/has a very particular view on how do run things, but the Pope being capable of being so uninformed really worries me. Jesus help him and us.

Anonymous said...

Why adopt the vocabulary of the revolutionaries? Please, faithful Catholics, use the words homosexual or sodomite. Enough of this "gay". You are playing into their nefarious agenda. You are sanitising perversion.

TLM said...

Lord Jesus HAVE MERCY ON US!! This was a hard, if not torturous read for me. It weighs heavily on my heart. Not that I, or any of us for that matter, are unaware of the evils that permeate the Church of Christ, but to read in print is beyond words to describe.

I am praying that Francis was unaware of what this Radcliffe is all about, and I am afraid to think of the other alternatives that you suggest, Vox, even though they are entirely within the realm of possibility. The horror of it is incredible to imagine. A nightmare beyond all nightmares.

Sweet Mary, take us under your Mantle.

TLM said...

Ha! I find myself more and more not even using the word 'Homosexual' or 'Homosexuals'.....I think more appropriate is 'Sodomy' and 'Sodomites'.

Capt. Morgan said...

It is impossible to believe that Pope Francis is not leading this destruction. We are fully into the beginning of the chastisement that the Holy Mother warned us of. As the world burns, so does the Church. This is going to be very bad.

Anonymous said...

Sadly many will leave the Church under this pontiff. The devout will come to doubt that the Pope is chosen by God due to this Pope standing against the Churches teachings of 2000 years. Many liberal Catholics will leave because there will be no compelling reason to go to a Church that doesn't even believe in itself.

Yet we know that this is a well deserved chastisement. Long before Vatican II, Catholics we becoming weak, worldly, selfish, and greedy.

As God allowed kings of Israel to be sinful, leading the Israelites to follow their selfish desires into death and destruction, the Catholics are likewise being lead follow their selfish desires to chastisement.

We can choose to follow God, to be selfless, self sacrificing, humble, devout, and not follow the crowd.

Yes, today Catholics swim in Satan's waters with a smile. We plop down in front of the TV or computer and drink in the sin. The mass media is totally atheistic and hates God and yet out of laziness and selfishness we won't turn it off. Slowly Satan destroys our thinking, our faith, our goodness, and we give in voluntarily.

Let us all pray for strength to stand up against Satan, for our fellow Catholics, and the restoration of the Catholic Church.

Steve said...

Pope Francis' constant promotion of the Church's teachings in regard to family, marriage and sexuality demonstrates that he rejects the promotion of sodomy.

His Holiness Pope Francis has time and again exhorted the Faithful to reject Satan and sin.

Pope Francis has time again exhorted the Faithful to holy lives.

We can be confident that Pope Francis, particularly during the upcoming Synod on the Family, will continue to uphold and promote the True Faith.

Peace.

Steve

Aloysius Gonzaga said...

Let's give up on trying to guess what is going on in the Pope's head. There must be more worthwhile things to do.

fromrome said...

He knew...

https://fromrome.wordpress.com/2015/02/10/team-bergoglio-is-a-heretical-conspiracy-to-overthrow-the-church-of-christ/

Lynda said...

Of course, Pope Francis had to know. There is a procedure to such appointments. Detailed background briefing would be provided by the relevant advisors who then put him forward. Fr Radcliffes heresy has been known around the world, including by interested laymen, for decades. It on this basis that he gets his invitations for positions, to give talks, etc.

Anonymous said...

People have to take communion from this fan of genital activity?

He'll vomit you out of His mouth padre.