“A time is coming when men will go mad, and when they see someone who is not mad, they will attack him, saying, 'You are mad; you are not like us.” ― St. Antony the Great
This heartfelt video message from Fr Mawdsley - whose Mass I have assisted at and been in the confessional - all starts from the false premise; that one should resist the pope, and he means Bergoglio. Michael J Matt has been flogging this dead horse repeatedly, and reaching a dead end repeatedly. Fr Mawdsley has a brilliant mind but is hide bound by his incardination in the FSSP. He could only deliver this video after the head of the FSSP in the UK had vetted it. It is symptomatic and emblematic of the elephant that can never be mentioned in Catholic Rad Trad world: the filth that masquerades under the stage name of "Francis" is an antipope pure and simple. All the priestly societies saying the TLM have hoisted their petard and stabbed Christ and His Vicar in the back. This is the second crucifixion of the Church.
They follow the anti cardinals and anti bishops who accept the antipope as their Vicar of Christ, cause they could never be wrong right? All the while offering their Masses in union with the antipope, the False Prophet, which is the cause of great sacrilege in the world; and no merits can flow from their Masses as God will not be mocked. Where are the true militants of Christ? Where are the saints of the Church? Well there are two bishops in the world from Texas and from Kazakstan who have raised their voices and declared for the true pope, Benedict XVI. And one truly faithful Franciscan brother Fra Alexis Bugnolo who has the blog FromRome.info. There are also a number of admirable secular Catholics who have the clarity of mind to know the obvious: that Pope Benedict never renounced the Papacy.
That all these so-called Catholic rad trad TLM loving priestly societies and their eager willing lap dog media are culpable of following the back-stabbing cardinals - oh the Burkes and Brandmullers, the trad darlings - out of the Catholic Church. The CIA and globalists needed their man in the Vatican for their manifest genocide plans to have traction. So all those rad trad priestly societies and their congregations and their lap dogs have merrily taken the jabs because the antipope said so. How pathetic and sad at the same time. The Second Letter to the Thessalonians - "because they receive not the love of the truth, that they might be saved" - refers to them as much as all who have believed the "operation of error"
It is clear as light that it is impossible that the Argentinian devil can be the pope. It is impossible that this apostate liar can sit on the throne of Peter. It makes Vatican 1 a lie; it makes our Lords words, I have prayed for you Peter that you do not lose the faith, a lie. It makes Our Blessed Lords words to Peter, what shall be bound on earth shall be bound in heaven, a lie too.
In 1983, as we all know, Pope John Paul II issued his New Code of Canon Law which bound heaven. The canon 332,2 which states should the Roman Pontiff renounce his office in Latin, and the word for office is munus. Cut to the declaratio, and at the crucial juncture when HH BXVI gets to his intent he uses the word ministerio. He failed the canon to renounce his munus. It doesn't wash, oh he meant munus they are interchangeable, and every other argument under the sun. He failed the canon, bound in heaven, deliberately so. Cardinal Ratzinger was there as JP II's right hand man, he knew the code. There were 40 errors in the Latin script of the declaratio which doesn't make sense from an expert latinist that Ratzinger is. Ah, so therein lies the mystery of why, why did he do it. Go to FromRome.info and learn from another latin scholar who has translated over 1000 pages from Latin into English.
Pope Boniface VIII's Bull states that you have to be in union with the pope to be a catholic. I remain in union with HH Pope Benedict XVI still gloriously reigning, and refuse to go to a Mass where the priests are in union with the antipope, because I become complicit in a sacrilege and there is more merit to be had in remaining at home and praying the Holy Rosary than assisting at a sacrilegious Mass. I forego the beauty and sacredness of these Masses in order to be in union with my pope. And I so miss my latin Mass that drew me back to the faith. rad trads have treated the Latin Mass as an idol above the love of Almighty God
So Michael and Fr Mawdsley, why don't you use your God-given sensus catholicus and connect the dots. Become a Catholic and accept Benedict as your pope. Stand up for Christ and His Church. Why does Matt keep moaning and playing the same pukling tune when the truth is staring him in the face.
These are times of great darkness and one must stay deeply close to Christ in the Holy Eucharist, both to comfort our God and to strengthen one's self. Bergoglio is not done. He is after the deepest Essence of the Church. He is hell bent on destroying the Mass and and negating the Real Presence of Christ in the Holy Eucharist. The destruction planned is beyond the corruption of the human institution of the Church. it is meant to suppress and negate the treasures given to us in Catholicism. I believe the Church will go underground and each of us will have to enter our soul and answer the question 'Who am I serving?' There will be no way to carry water on both shoulders. Each of us will be either totally committed To Christ or we will be part of the apostate church. it is coming and it is devil -orchestrated. Read up on St. Thomas Aquinas' understancding of obedience. To follow what Bergoglio is putting forth is to fail Christ. Draw close to Christ and He will give yo the discernment to act in His way. There will be no way to care
Every time they call the fraud "holy father" they reinforce it. I don't know details because I'm just a pewsitter, but I know it makes my stomach churn. What will it take??!. What else could CCC 675 be referring to? Some future interplanetary church of aliens???? Madeleine
hen Pope Francis says that we must ‘move forward’ this is possible only with Vatican Council II interpreted with a Fake Premise. He is referring to the Irrational Premise. When he says that ‘we cannot go back to the past’, he is referring to the Rational Premise. It is with the Rational Premise in the interpretation of Vatican Council II that we can, and have to, go back to the past. Since without the Fake Premise there are no exceptions in Vatican Council II for the Athanasius Creed etc. There is no development of doctrine. The liberalism ends with the Rational Premise. We cannot ‘go forward’. It is the Fake Premise which creates schism with the past Magisterium and which is a dishonest reasoning. It is not traditional Catholic philosophy and theology. -Lionel Andrades
We cannot go back to the past a bishop would say, but, really, we cannot stay in the present, or go to the future, since we do not have the theology any more to do so. The present liberalism depends upon the False Premise which has been exposed. The New Theology has its foundation in the False Premise. So we are back to the old theology. -Lionel Andrades
Pope Francis may follow the Left ; the progressivists, but without the False Premise they all have to return to the old theology, and go back to the past.
There can be only one rational interpretation of Vatican Council II and it will take the Catholic Church back to the past.-Lionel Andrades
The recitation of the Profession of Faith today at Holy Mass in all rites and liturgies is political and ideological. The Nicene Creed is interpreted with the False not the Rational Premise and so the conclusion is nontraditional, schismatic and heretical. This is official. There is a choice though.
1. I believe in one baptism for the forgiveness of sins, it is the baptism of water which is visible and repeatable.
2. I believe in one baptism for the forgiveness of sins, it includes the baptism of desire, baptism of blood and invincible ignorance etc, which are visible and known in particular cases and so are an exception for the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus, the Athanasius Creed, the Syllabus of Errors and other Magisterial Documents.
Lumen Gentium 8, Unitatis Redintigratio 3 etc in Vatican Council II are also considered exceptions and they exclude the baptism of water.
______________
1. I believe in the one, holy, Catholic and Apostolic Church which says outside the Church there is no salvation ( 1940 and before)
2. I believe in the one, holy, Catholic and Apostolic Church which says outside the Church there is salvation, there is known salvation ( 1949-2022).
So there are two interpretations of the Nicene Creed. One is with the Rational Premise and the other is with the False Premise. The conclusion is traditional and non traditional.The Profession of Faith with the False Premise is political.
There are hundreds of priests and religious sisters of the Congregation of Mary Immaculate Queen (CMRI) (Latin: Congregatio Mariae Reginae Immaculatae) who make their religious profession upon the irrational interpretation of Vatican Council II, extra ecclesiam nulla salus, the Nicene Creed, the Athanasius Creed, the Syllabus of Errors, the Catechism of Pope Pius X etc. They also interpret Mystici Corporis and Quanta Cura irrationally. Bishop Mark Pivarunas and Fr.Benedict Hughes also make their Profession of Faith and take an Oath of Office with the same error.-Lionel Andrades
Without this mistake the whole Church goes back to Tradition immediately
You may affirm the baptism of desire theoretically but please do not project it as an exception for extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS). There are no practical cases. There is no baptism of desire in our reality. There is no baptism of desire case whom we can meet. There is no baptism of desire case which we can know of. The baptism of desire never ever was an exception for traditional EENS. This is common sense. The popes and saints over the centuries knew this. We must not re-interpret the popes and saints of the past, as making a mistake. They did not confuse what is invisible as being visible. The Church before the 1940’s did not make this mistake. The Church in the 1949 Letter of the Holy Office made this mistake and it continues to do so.
Without this mistake the whole Church goes back to Tradition immediately. -Lionel Andrades
FEBRUARY 9, 2022 The Tridentine theology depends upon the premise and not the Latin Mass
If Pope Francis interprets Vatican Council II with the Rational Premise then his theology will be Tridentine at the Novus Ordo Mass.
If Bishop Roland Minnerath interprets Vatican Council II with the Rational Premise then this theology will be Tridentine at the Novus Ordo Mass in Dijon, France.
If Cardinal Vincent Nicols and Cardinal Robert Sarah would interpret Vatican Council II with the Rational Premise then their theology would be Tridentine at the Novus Ordo and Latin Mass.-Lionel Andrades
11 comments:
This heartfelt video message from Fr Mawdsley - whose Mass I have assisted at and been in the confessional - all starts from the false premise; that one should resist the pope, and he means Bergoglio. Michael J Matt has been flogging this dead horse repeatedly, and reaching a dead end repeatedly. Fr Mawdsley has a brilliant mind but is hide bound by his incardination in the FSSP. He could only deliver this video after the head of the FSSP in the UK had vetted it. It is symptomatic and emblematic of the elephant that can never be mentioned in Catholic Rad Trad world: the filth that masquerades under the stage name of "Francis" is an antipope pure and simple. All the priestly societies saying the TLM have hoisted their petard and stabbed Christ and His Vicar in the back. This is the second crucifixion of the Church.
They follow the anti cardinals and anti bishops who accept the antipope as their Vicar of Christ, cause they could never be wrong right? All the while offering their Masses in union with the antipope, the False Prophet, which is the cause of great sacrilege in the world; and no merits can flow from their Masses as God will not be mocked. Where are the true militants of Christ? Where are the saints of the Church? Well there are two bishops in the world from Texas and from Kazakstan who have raised their voices and declared for the true pope, Benedict XVI. And one truly faithful Franciscan brother Fra Alexis Bugnolo who has the blog FromRome.info. There are also a number of admirable secular Catholics who have the clarity of mind to know the obvious: that Pope Benedict never renounced the Papacy.
That all these so-called Catholic rad trad TLM loving priestly societies and their eager willing lap dog media are culpable of following the back-stabbing cardinals - oh the Burkes and Brandmullers, the trad darlings - out of the Catholic Church. The CIA and globalists needed their man in the Vatican for their manifest genocide plans to have traction. So all those rad trad priestly societies and their congregations and their lap dogs have merrily taken the jabs because the antipope said so. How pathetic and sad at the same time. The Second Letter to the Thessalonians - "because they receive not the love of the truth, that they might be saved" - refers to them as much as all who have believed the "operation of error"
It is clear as light that it is impossible that the Argentinian devil can be the pope. It is impossible that this apostate liar can sit on the throne of Peter. It makes Vatican 1 a lie; it makes our Lords words, I have prayed for you Peter that you do not lose the faith, a lie. It makes Our Blessed Lords words to Peter, what shall be bound on earth shall be bound in heaven, a lie too.
In 1983, as we all know, Pope John Paul II issued his New Code of Canon Law which bound heaven. The canon 332,2 which states should the Roman Pontiff renounce his office in Latin, and the word for office is munus. Cut to the declaratio, and at the crucial juncture when HH BXVI gets to his intent he uses the word ministerio. He failed the canon to renounce his munus. It doesn't wash, oh he meant munus they are interchangeable, and every other argument under the sun. He failed the canon, bound in heaven, deliberately so. Cardinal Ratzinger was there as JP II's right hand man, he knew the code. There were 40 errors in the Latin script of the declaratio which doesn't make sense from an expert latinist that Ratzinger is. Ah, so therein lies the mystery of why, why did he do it. Go to FromRome.info and learn from another latin scholar who has translated over 1000 pages from Latin into English.
Contd..
Pope Boniface VIII's Bull states that you have to be in union with the pope to be a catholic. I remain in union with HH Pope Benedict XVI still gloriously reigning, and refuse to go to a Mass where the priests are in union with the antipope, because I become complicit in a sacrilege and there is more merit to be had in remaining at home and praying the Holy Rosary than assisting at a sacrilegious Mass. I forego the beauty and sacredness of these Masses in order to be in union with my pope. And I so miss my latin Mass that drew me back to the faith. rad trads have treated the Latin Mass as an idol above the love of Almighty God
So Michael and Fr Mawdsley, why don't you use your God-given sensus catholicus and connect the dots. Become a Catholic and accept Benedict as your pope. Stand up for Christ and His Church. Why does Matt keep moaning and playing the same pukling tune when the truth is staring him in the face.
Paul Dale
These are times of great darkness and one must stay deeply close to Christ in the Holy Eucharist, both to comfort our God and to strengthen one's self. Bergoglio is not done. He is after the deepest Essence of the Church. He is hell bent on destroying the Mass and and negating the Real Presence of Christ in the Holy Eucharist. The destruction planned is beyond the corruption of the human institution of the Church. it is meant to suppress and negate the treasures given to us in Catholicism. I believe the Church will go underground and each of us will have to enter our soul and answer the question 'Who am I serving?' There will be no way to carry water on both shoulders. Each of us will be either totally committed To Christ or we will be part of the apostate church. it is coming and it is devil -orchestrated. Read up on St. Thomas Aquinas' understancding of obedience. To follow what Bergoglio is putting forth is to fail Christ. Draw close to Christ and He will give yo the discernment to act in His way.
There will be no way to care
Every time they call the fraud "holy father" they reinforce it. I don't know details because I'm just a pewsitter, but I know it makes my stomach churn. What will it take??!. What else could CCC 675 be referring to? Some future interplanetary church of aliens????
Madeleine
hen Pope Francis says that we must ‘move forward’ this is possible only with Vatican Council II interpreted with a Fake Premise. He is referring to the Irrational Premise. When he says that ‘we cannot go back to the past’, he is referring to the Rational Premise. It is with the Rational Premise in the interpretation of Vatican Council II that we can, and have to, go back to the past. Since without the Fake Premise there are no exceptions in Vatican Council II for the Athanasius Creed etc. There is no development of doctrine. The liberalism ends with the Rational Premise. We cannot ‘go forward’. It is the Fake Premise which creates schism with the past Magisterium and which is a dishonest reasoning. It is not traditional Catholic philosophy and theology. -Lionel Andrades
We cannot go back to the past a bishop would say, but, really, we cannot stay in the present, or go to the future, since we do not have the theology any more to do so. The present liberalism depends upon the False Premise which has been exposed. The New Theology has its foundation in the False Premise. So we are back to the old theology. -Lionel Andrades
Pope Francis may follow the Left ; the progressivists, but without the False Premise they all have to return to the old theology, and go back to the past.
There can be only one rational interpretation of Vatican Council II and it will take the Catholic Church back to the past.-Lionel Andrades
The recitation of the Profession of Faith today at Holy Mass in all rites and liturgies is political and ideological. The Nicene Creed is interpreted with the False not the Rational Premise and so the conclusion is nontraditional, schismatic and heretical. This is official. There is a choice though.
1. I believe in one baptism for the forgiveness of sins, it is the baptism of water which is visible and repeatable.
2. I believe in one baptism for the forgiveness of sins, it includes the baptism of desire, baptism of blood and invincible ignorance etc, which are visible and known in particular cases and so are an exception for the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus, the Athanasius Creed, the Syllabus of Errors and other Magisterial Documents.
Lumen Gentium 8, Unitatis Redintigratio 3 etc in Vatican Council II are also considered exceptions and they exclude the baptism of water.
______________
1. I believe in the one, holy, Catholic and Apostolic Church which says outside the Church there is no salvation ( 1940 and before)
2. I believe in the one, holy, Catholic and Apostolic Church which says outside the Church there is salvation, there is known salvation ( 1949-2022).
So there are two interpretations of the Nicene Creed. One is with the Rational Premise and the other is with the False Premise. The conclusion is traditional and non traditional.The Profession of Faith with the False Premise is political.
-Lionel Andrades
There are hundreds of priests and religious sisters of the Congregation of Mary Immaculate Queen (CMRI) (Latin: Congregatio Mariae Reginae Immaculatae) who make their religious profession upon the irrational interpretation of Vatican Council II, extra ecclesiam nulla salus, the Nicene Creed, the Athanasius Creed, the Syllabus of Errors, the Catechism of Pope Pius X etc. They also interpret Mystici Corporis and Quanta Cura irrationally. Bishop Mark Pivarunas and Fr.Benedict Hughes also make their Profession of Faith and take an Oath of Office with the same error.-Lionel Andrades
Without this mistake the whole Church goes back to Tradition immediately
You may affirm the baptism of desire theoretically but please do not project it as an exception for extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS). There are no practical cases. There is no baptism of desire in our reality. There is no baptism of desire case whom we can meet. There is no baptism of desire case which we can know of. The baptism of desire never ever was an exception for traditional EENS. This is common sense. The popes and saints over the centuries knew this. We must not re-interpret the popes and saints of the past, as making a mistake. They did not confuse what is invisible as being visible. The Church before the 1940’s did not make this mistake. The Church in the 1949 Letter of the Holy Office made this mistake and it continues to do so.
Without this mistake the whole Church goes back to Tradition immediately. -Lionel Andrades
FEBRUARY 9, 2022
The Tridentine theology depends upon the premise and not the Latin Mass
If Pope Francis interprets Vatican Council II with the Rational Premise then his theology will be Tridentine at the Novus Ordo Mass.
If Bishop Roland Minnerath interprets Vatican Council II with the Rational Premise then this theology will be Tridentine at the Novus Ordo Mass in Dijon, France.
If Cardinal Vincent Nicols and Cardinal Robert Sarah would interpret Vatican Council II with the Rational Premise then their theology would be Tridentine at the Novus Ordo and Latin Mass.-Lionel Andrades
Post a Comment