“A time is coming when men will go mad, and when they see someone who is not mad, they will attack him, saying, 'You are mad; you are not like us.” ― St. Antony the Great
Wednesday 4 December 2019
Monday 2 December 2019
BREAKING: POPE DECLARES CLIMATE CHANGE IS REAL
ROME: V.C. News - The Pope said "the changes of seasons and climates warn us" and that "before long we may look" for other signs in the "sun and moon and stars."
In his First Homily on the Gospels as recorded in Matins of the First Sunday of Advent, Pope St. Gregory the Great (540 - 604) has confirmed "climate change" undoubtedly understanding that the climate in fact, does change, and then changes again.
Interviewed about Pope Gregory's comment and the obvious conclusion that the climate is always changing, George Soros' dupe, Greta Thunberg, said that "the climate crisis is not just about the environment. It is a crisis of human
rights, of justice, and of political will." With Soros looking on approvingly, Thunberg then confessed to being a communist stating that, "Colonial, racist, and patriarchal
systems of oppression have created and fueled it. We need to dismantle them
all."
Homily by Pope St. Gregory the Great,
1st on the Gospels
Our Lord and Saviour wisheth to find us ready at His second
coming. Therefore He telleth us what will be the evils of the world as it
groweth old, that He may wean our hearts from worldly affections. Here we read
what great convulsions will go before the end, that, if we will not fear God in
our prosperity, we may at least be scourged into fearing His judgment when it
is at hand.
Immediately before the passage which hath just been read
from the Gospel, are found the following words of our Lord, Nation shall rise
against nation, and kingdom against kingdom, and great earthquakes shall be in
divers places, and pestilences and famines. Then, after a few more verses,
cometh today's Gospel. There shall be signs in the sun, and in the moon, and in
the stars; and upon the earth distress of nations with perplexity, the sea and
the waves roaring. Now some of these things are come to pass already, and we
fear the others are not far off.
In these our days we see nation rise against nation, and
their distress over all the earth, more than we read in books hath ever come to
pass of old time. Ye know also how often we hear of earthquakes overwhelming
countless cities in other parts of the world. As for pestilences, we suffer
from them ourselves, with hardly any intermission. As yet we do not see signs
in the sun, and in the moon, and in the stars; but the changes of seasons and
climates warn us that we may look for these also before long.
Labels:
George Soros,
Humour,
St. Gregory the Great
Sunday 1 December 2019
Lo! he comes with clouds descending
Labels:
Advent
Saturday 30 November 2019
No Blessing For You!
Gosh, just when I thought I could just post some nice Advent music, Bergoglio goes and does it again!
The first time was the day after his election when he refused to bless the assembled media Now, it is twice in two days.
When Catholics visit the Pope, they have a right to his Apostolic Blessing.
When non-Catholics visit, they don't demand that he does not bless and in fact, should be insulted that he denied them the grace which could lead to conversion.
Gosh, can't we go just one day without this monster doing something wretchedly evil and un-Catholic?
On the other hand, maybe he does not give the Apostolic Blessing because he's not the ...!
Labels:
More Bergoglian heresy
Friday 29 November 2019
When those who should know better spread the lie of genderism, this is what they don't discuss!
Those in leadership in all walks of life in government, academia, business and even the Church tell you that gender is fluid and that a boy born a boy can really be a girl or whatever, this is what they leave out.
They are evil.
What parent permitted this?
What authority figure affirmed it?
What doctor performed it?
There was a time when we took mental illness seriously. Now, we simply affirm delusion and if you don't agree with it, you're a hater. There was a time when we would have taken the doctor that butchered this poor girl and removed his license and then put him on trial and the parent would have been arrested for child endangerment and the child taken into protection by the State. Now the State endorses it and demands you accept it as right and just.
Yes, this IS a girl. This poor girl needed help. She needed love, she needed therapy, psychological and spiritual. She deserved care and protection to work through whatever delusions she had that caused her to think herself as a boy. Instead, she was used by an anti-Christ fascist mob for their political ends and will endure suffering the rest of her life that she cannot yet comprehend.
Lest you think this is not occurring on a large scale, dozens are raising money for what they now call, "top surgery."
https://www.gofundme.com/mvc.php?route=homepage_norma/search&term=top%20surgery
Walt Heyer found out the truth.
http://waltheyer.com/
Thanks to a reader for this. Notice, the first person interviewed, "Billy," was "fondled" as a confused boy. Perpetrating perverts can sense who is the weak one, who is the target, then the go after their prey. They take a confused child and groom him or her to be one like them. Note that the second one, "Rene" had an absent and alcoholic father. Walt Heyer is also interviewed, he had a crazy grandmother who cross-dressed him and later was sexually abused. Is there a theme here?
And this is what our leaders in government, academia, industry, church and state think is good and fair and just.
God will deal with them friend. In every way.
What parent permitted this?
What authority figure affirmed it?
What doctor performed it?
There was a time when we took mental illness seriously. Now, we simply affirm delusion and if you don't agree with it, you're a hater. There was a time when we would have taken the doctor that butchered this poor girl and removed his license and then put him on trial and the parent would have been arrested for child endangerment and the child taken into protection by the State. Now the State endorses it and demands you accept it as right and just.
Yes, this IS a girl. This poor girl needed help. She needed love, she needed therapy, psychological and spiritual. She deserved care and protection to work through whatever delusions she had that caused her to think herself as a boy. Instead, she was used by an anti-Christ fascist mob for their political ends and will endure suffering the rest of her life that she cannot yet comprehend.
Lest you think this is not occurring on a large scale, dozens are raising money for what they now call, "top surgery."
https://www.gofundme.com/mvc.php?route=homepage_norma/search&term=top%20surgery
Walt Heyer found out the truth.
http://waltheyer.com/
Thanks to a reader for this. Notice, the first person interviewed, "Billy," was "fondled" as a confused boy. Perpetrating perverts can sense who is the weak one, who is the target, then the go after their prey. They take a confused child and groom him or her to be one like them. Note that the second one, "Rene" had an absent and alcoholic father. Walt Heyer is also interviewed, he had a crazy grandmother who cross-dressed him and later was sexually abused. Is there a theme here?
And this is what our leaders in government, academia, industry, church and state think is good and fair and just.
God will deal with them friend. In every way.
Labels:
Homoheresy
Thursday 28 November 2019
Bishop Rick Stika does it again!
Bishop Rick Stika of Knoxville has done it again. He has again proved that he is unfit for the Office of Bishop and was probably never fit for the priesthood in the first place. The man has a serious problem. Clearly, given the amount of time he spends on Twitter, he has a poor prayer life, probably does not say his Office and verifies that Knoxville clearly doesn't need a bishop!
He has blocked me on Twitter. Heck, he's probably blocked you. What this episcopal fraud doesn't realise, the same for Ivereigh and others, is that you can't really stop anyone from reading your Tweets unless you go private. All one needs to do is open a different web browser where one is not logged in and - voila!
Or, you can just wait 'til someone shares his latest idiocy. Such as this.
And if that is not enough, there is this heresy.
With Rick and his ilk, it's always those nasty TLM people that consistently get it wrong, eh?
Is Rick dividing Jesus? Did Our Lord Jesus Christ not say, "The Father and I are one?" If this is what Rick believes, this is heresy.
Let us look at paragraph 20 of the Encyclical Mediator Dei by Pope Piux XII.
20. This result is, in fact, achieved when Christ lives and thrives, as it were, in the hearts of men, and when men's hearts in turn are fashioned and expanded as though by Christ. This makes it possible for the sacred temple, where the Divine Majesty receives the acceptable worship which His law prescribes, to increase and prosper day by day in this land of exile of earth. Along with the Church, therefore, her Divine Founder is present at every liturgical function: Christ is present at the august sacrifice of the altar both in the person of His minister and above all under the eucharistic species. He is present in the sacraments, infusing into them the power which makes them ready instruments of sanctification. He is present, finally, in prayer of praise and petition we direct to God, as it is written: "Where there are two or three gathered together in My Name, there am I in the midst of them."[22] The sacred liturgy is, consequently, the public worship which our Redeemer as Head of the Church renders to the Father, as well as the worship which the community of the faithful renders to its Founder, and through Him to the heavenly Father. It is, in short, the worship rendered by the Mystical Body of Christ in the entirety of its Head and members.
How about a look at the 1983 Catechism of the Catholic Church?
1325 "The Eucharist is the efficacious sign and sublime cause of that communion in the divine life and that unity of the People of God by which the Church is kept in being. It is the culmination both of God's action sanctifying the world in Christ and of the worship men offer to Christ and through him to the Father in the Holy Spirit."
We have this from the ancient Roman Missal which follows the Pater Noster and Libera nos:
He uncovers the chalice, genuflects, takes the Host and breaking it down the middle over the chalice says:
Per eúndem Dóminum nostrum Jesum Christum Fílium tuum, Through the same Jesus Christ, Thy Son our Lord,
He breaks off a Particle from the Host. Qui tecum vivit et regnat in unitáte Spíritus Sancti Deus, Who is God living and reigning with Thee in the unity of the Holy Ghost,
And then, of course, the Nicene Creed:
"And in the Holy Spirit, the Lord and Life-giver, who proceeds from the Father, who with the Father and Son is worshipped and glorified."
I could go on, but I've made my point.
Add yours in the combox.
Add yours in the combox.
Bishop Rick, Happy Thanksgiving and get off of Twitter.
Wednesday 27 November 2019
Bergoglio favours financial investment - turns out he's a capitalist!
Pope Francis Money Quote
The web page for "Peter's Pence has this statement:
"The concrete participation, including economic, in the needs of the universal ecclesial community has taken different forms throughout history. These collections and donations by the individual faithful or entire local churches raise the awareness that all the baptized are called to materially sustain the work of evangelization and at the same time to help the poor in whatever way is possible."
The United States Conference of Catholic Bishops states the following:
“Today, the Peter's Pence Collection supports the Pope's philanthropy by giving the Holy Father the means to provide emergency assistance to those in need because of natural disaster, war, oppression, and disease.”
Francis Bergoglio was asked about the financial corruption of the pennies of faithful Catholics around the world. It is hard to know if he's more corrupt or stupid.
Or thinks we are.
That scent you smell emanating from Francis is not frankincense.
Or thinks we are.
That scent you smell emanating from Francis is not frankincense.
Cristiana Caricato (TV2000, Italy): Holy Father, people read
in the newspapers that the Holy See has acquired an apartment for hundreds of
thousands of euros in the heart of London, and they become a bit disconcerted,
because of this use of Vatican finances. Also, in particular, because it
involves Peter’s Pence. Did you know of these financial things? And above all,
in your opinion, is it correct to use
Peter’s Pence in that way? You have often said that money should not be
made with money. You have often denounced the unscrupulous use of finances.
However, we see that this operation involves the Holy See. This scandalizes in
some way. How do you see this whole event?
Pope Francis: Thank you. First of all, in good
administration it is normal for a sum to come from the Peter’s Pence, and what
do I do? Put in a drawer? No, this is bad administration. But I look to make an
investment, and when there is the need, to give... when there is the necessity,
in one year, you take it. Your capital you do not devalue, if it maintains or
if it grows a little. This is good administration.
If [it is] an administration of the drawer, it is bad. But
you should try to make a good administration, a good investment. Is that clear?
Also an investment, as we say, an investment by widows? What
do widows do? [Ed.note: An Italian saying] Two or three here, five here, if one
falls, one of the others so that they are not ruined is always on security,
this is always moral.
If from Peter’s Pence you invest in a weapons factory, the
pence is not a pence there, eh?
If you make an investment and for years, without touching
it, the capital does not go, Peter’s Pence should be spent in one year, one
year and a half, until the other collection arrives which is made world-wide.
And this is good management.
On security, and also, yes, you can buy a property, rent it,
and then sell it. But, on security, with all of the securities, for the good of
the people of the Pence. This, one. Then, what passed passed: A scandal. They
have done things that do not seem ‘clean.’
But, the report did not come from the outside. That reform
of the economic methodology, that Benedict XVI had already started, is going
forward. And it was the auditor of the internal accounts to say: ‘Here there is
a bad thing. Here there is something that is not working.’ And he came to me.
And I said, but are you sure? ‘Yes.’ And he let me see the numbers. ‘What
should I do?’ [he asked]. [I said:] There is the Vatican justice. Go and give
the report to the Promoter of Justice. And in this I remained content, because
you see that the Vatican administration now has the resources to clarify the
bad things which happen inside, like in this case, that -- if it is not the
case of the apartment in London, because this is not yet clear -- but in that
[other instance] there were cases of corruption.
And the Promoter of Justice studied the accusations,
consulted, and saw an imbalance in the budget. And then, he asked me for
permission to make the searches. I said: ‘Is it clear, your report?’ He told
me, ‘yes, there is a presumption of corruption in these cases. I should carry
out searches in this office, this office, and this office.’ And I signed the
authorization.
The searches were done in five offices. And up to today, but
we have the presumption of innocence, but there is capital that is not
administered well, also with corruption.
I believe that in less than two months they will begin
questioning the five people that are blocked [suspended from the Vatican],
because there were indications of corruption. You will ask me: ‘And these five
are corrupt?’ No, the presumption of innocence is a guarantee, a human right.
But, there is corruption, and you will see. With the searches you will see if
they are guilty or not.
It’s a bad thing, it’s not good what is happening in the
Vatican. But it is clear that the internal mechanisms are beginning to work,
those that Benedict XVI had already started to make. And I thank God. I do not
thank God that there is corruption, but I thank God that the Vatican monitoring
system is working well.
Bruni: The next question is from Phil Pullella of Reuters.
Pope Francis: [small talk]
Philip Pullella (Reuters): [small talk] If you permit me, I
would like to follow a little on the question Cristiana asked, if you permit
me, with a few more details.
There is a lot of worry in the last few weeks about what
happened and about the finances of the Vatican. And according to some people,
there is an internal war over who should control the money, according to some
people. The major part of the members of the council of the administration of
AIF are dismissed. The Egmont Group, a group of these financial authorities
have suspended of the Vatican, the secure communication [...] The director of
AIF is still suspended, as you said, and still there is no general
revisore.
What can you do or say to guarantee to the international
financial community, and to the faithful in general, who are called to
contribute to Peter’s Pence, that the Vatican will not return to be considered
a pariah a thing [inaudible] that is, to have trust you will continue and not
return to the habits of the past?
Pope Francis: Thank you for the question. The Vatican has
made steps forward in its administration, for example, the IOR today has the
acceptance of all the banks and can act like the Italian banks, normal.
Something which was not there a year ago. There is progress.
Then, the Egmont Group, that is not an official
international group, a group to which the AIF belongs. And the international
control does not depend on the Egmont Group, a private group that has its
weight. It is a private group. And MONEYVAL will carry out the inspection it
has scheduled for the first months of the next year and it will do it, it will
do it.
The director of the AIF is in suspension because there were
suspicions of bad administration. The president of AIF was strong with the
Egmont Group to take back the documentation. And this the justice cannot do.
In front of this, I consulted with an Italian judge of a
high level. 'What should I do?' Justice in front of an accusation of corruption
is sovereign in a country. It's sovereign. And no one can involve themselves
there inside. No one can say to the Egmont Group, “your papers are here.” No,
the papers should be studied, that they add up (FARE) to what seems a bad
administration, in the sense of a bad control.
It was AIF that did not control, it seems, the crimes of
others. And therefore [it failed] in its duty of controls. I hope that they
prove it is not so. Because there is, still, the presumption of innocence.
And for the moment, the magistrates, the magistrate is
sovereign. He should study how it went. Because on the contrary,, a country
should have a superior administration that would harm the sovereignty of the
country.
And the [term of the] president of AIF was expiring
[November] 19th. I would call him a few days before and he was not in agreement
that I was re-calling him [as president of AIF] and announced that the 19th he
was leaving. I found a successor, a judge of the highest juridical and economic
level, national and international, and at my return, he takes charge of AIF and
things will continue like so.
It would have been a contradiction that the monitoring
authority to be sovereign over the state. It is something which is not easy to
understand, but what is a little disturbed is the Egmont Group, which is a
private group. It helps a lot, but it is not the monitoring authority of
MONEYVAL. MONEYVAL will study the numbers. It will study the procedures. It
will study how [...] the Promoter of Justice. And how the judges have
determined the things.
I know that in these days the interrogation of the five who were
suspended will begin or has already begun. It is not easy, but we should not be
naive. We should not be slaves.
Someone told me -- but I do not believe it -- but they said,
'yes, with this, we have touched the Egmont Group. You scare the people . We
are creating a little terrorism…’ Let’s leave that aside. We go forward with
the law, with MONEYVAL, with the new president of AIF, and the director was
suspended but maybe he is innocent. I would like that, because it is a
beautiful thing [if] one is innocent and not guilty. I felt a little bit of
noise with this group that was not wanting that the papers be touched that
belong to the group.
Pullella: And a guarantee for the faithful that…?
Pope Francis: To guarantee this? Look, it’s the first time
that in the Vatican the pot is discovered from the inside, not from the
outside, From the outside many times. And they said look there and we had so
much embarrassment... But in this Pope Benedict was wise. And he began a
process that matured and now the institutions that the auditor had the courage
to make a written report against five people… The auditor is working. Really, I
do not want to offend the Egmont Group, because they did so much good, help,
but in this case the state has sovereignty. And even justice is more sovereign
then the executive power, more sovereign. It is not easy to understand but I
ask you all to understand this difficulty.
Labels:
Corruption,
More Bergoglian heresy,
Vatican Circus
Tuesday 26 November 2019
Bergoglio says that he is "incompetent" and goes right ahead and proves it!
"Oh no, what is he going to say this time?" |
"The use of nuclear weapons is immoral; this must go in the Catechism of the Catholic Church. And not only the use, but also the possession because if there is an accident or a crazed government -- one's madness can destroy humanity."
Okay... so what about China or Russia with these weapons pointed at North America. Are we allowed to have any as a deterrent or to hit back if they hit us first?
What an idiot.
Well, at least, when asked about the Bolivian Butcher he responded that he could not comment because he was "incompetent."
Labels:
More Bergoglian heresy
Monday 25 November 2019
The Pervert Protecting Pontiff
LA CAGE AUX FOLLES |
Labels:
Perverts,
Team Bergoglio
Fifty years of Novus Ordo garbage
Two week ago, I attended my first Novus Ordo Mass in over two years. A friend was being ordained to the transitional diaconate. I could have done without the serviettes in the sanctuary and the Cardinal's jokes, but other than that, it was tolerable.
When I think back to my childhood and my memories of Mass, I can recall in my mind's eye, six candles lit on the altar at the principal Mass which we always attended (there were maybe five in total) and maybe the Kyrie and Sanctus were sung, but that was it. It was a essentially a Read, or Low Mass with some music sprinkled here and there. Everyone knelt all the time and some had hand missals, my parents certainly did. One Sunday, there was a plywood table covered in one cloth and two stubby candles in the sanctuary and poor Father Michael Carroll, a good and saintly man, looked totally flummoxed. I can remember my mother saying, "Well, this is Vatican II." She didn't like it. That was 1965 and I was nine years old. Two years later, at the first class for the new crop of Altar Boys, we were told, "Congratulations Boys, you're the first class that does not need to learn Latin!"
This was the interim 1965 Missal which was the already slimmed down 1962 but in the vernacular up to the Offertory from then on, it was still Latin. The Prayers at the Foot of the Altar were shortened as in the Requiem, without the Judica Me and could be eliminated if one did the Asperges. The Epistle could be read by a layman (man!), there were fewer genuflections and crosses by the priest, the priest now said, "The Body of Christ" and we responded, "Amen" and the Last Gospel was gone. From there it was downhill. By 1967, Latin was gone, the music was atrocious and every week there was something new. We were told this was the New Mass. We did not know we were yet to get a New, New Mass.
By the time November 30, 1969 came, nobody really noticed. There were so many innovations from 1967 on that it was brought in my stealth. The only difference were the readings and some new "Eucharistic Prayers." The chaos blinded us all.
Nobody asked for this - the laity did not demand it.
If there was a problem, it was the ever-present Sunday and Feast Day Read or Low Mass, but that is for a different post and maybe a series.
The Novus Ordo liturgy of Montini has been a disaster for the faith. There is not one thing good which can be said about it but if you can try, please do, in the combox.
Please dear reader, abandon it, if you can. Find the traditional Mass, diocesan, FSSP. ICRSS, SSPX, drive as far as you must.
And read this and note the quotes from the alleged Saint, Montini, and tell me you don't here Bergoglio!
http://www.newliturgicalmovement.org/2019/11/paul-vis-contempt-for-catholics-who-did.html
When I think back to my childhood and my memories of Mass, I can recall in my mind's eye, six candles lit on the altar at the principal Mass which we always attended (there were maybe five in total) and maybe the Kyrie and Sanctus were sung, but that was it. It was a essentially a Read, or Low Mass with some music sprinkled here and there. Everyone knelt all the time and some had hand missals, my parents certainly did. One Sunday, there was a plywood table covered in one cloth and two stubby candles in the sanctuary and poor Father Michael Carroll, a good and saintly man, looked totally flummoxed. I can remember my mother saying, "Well, this is Vatican II." She didn't like it. That was 1965 and I was nine years old. Two years later, at the first class for the new crop of Altar Boys, we were told, "Congratulations Boys, you're the first class that does not need to learn Latin!"
This was the interim 1965 Missal which was the already slimmed down 1962 but in the vernacular up to the Offertory from then on, it was still Latin. The Prayers at the Foot of the Altar were shortened as in the Requiem, without the Judica Me and could be eliminated if one did the Asperges. The Epistle could be read by a layman (man!), there were fewer genuflections and crosses by the priest, the priest now said, "The Body of Christ" and we responded, "Amen" and the Last Gospel was gone. From there it was downhill. By 1967, Latin was gone, the music was atrocious and every week there was something new. We were told this was the New Mass. We did not know we were yet to get a New, New Mass.
By the time November 30, 1969 came, nobody really noticed. There were so many innovations from 1967 on that it was brought in my stealth. The only difference were the readings and some new "Eucharistic Prayers." The chaos blinded us all.
Nobody asked for this - the laity did not demand it.
If there was a problem, it was the ever-present Sunday and Feast Day Read or Low Mass, but that is for a different post and maybe a series.
The Novus Ordo liturgy of Montini has been a disaster for the faith. There is not one thing good which can be said about it but if you can try, please do, in the combox.
Please dear reader, abandon it, if you can. Find the traditional Mass, diocesan, FSSP. ICRSS, SSPX, drive as far as you must.
And read this and note the quotes from the alleged Saint, Montini, and tell me you don't here Bergoglio!
http://www.newliturgicalmovement.org/2019/11/paul-vis-contempt-for-catholics-who-did.html
Bergoglio has his own hand in the Vatican's financial corruption
Labels:
Corruption,
Team Bergoglio
Saturday 23 November 2019
"Sometimes the combox is better than the blogger."
In my morning perusal of my favourite blogs (all are on the left column), I read this on Non Veni Pacem. It struck me because the of what my fellow blogger, Mark, wrote:
As a blogger, I could not agree more. It is one reason why the combox is open and free and while moderated, generally uncensored with 99.9% of comments being published.
There was a reason why on March 13, 2013 I wanted to vomit. It was because I was looking into the face of evil. Not a shepherd, not a vicar, not a pastor, but the face of a man who gave himself over to Satan. I knew it, deep in my bones.
People are awakening. Others think as I; and furthermore, I consider that Ann Barnhardt has been on to all of this for quite a while.
Read this and please, read every comment.
https://nonvenipacem.com/2019/11/22/the-throne-of-peter-has-a-demonic-spawn-squatting-on-it-orchestrating-hells-circus/
"Sometimes the combox is better than the blogger."
As a blogger, I could not agree more. It is one reason why the combox is open and free and while moderated, generally uncensored with 99.9% of comments being published.
There was a reason why on March 13, 2013 I wanted to vomit. It was because I was looking into the face of evil. Not a shepherd, not a vicar, not a pastor, but the face of a man who gave himself over to Satan. I knew it, deep in my bones.
People are awakening. Others think as I; and furthermore, I consider that Ann Barnhardt has been on to all of this for quite a while.
Read this and please, read every comment.
“The throne of Peter has a demonic spawn squatting on it, orchestrating Hell’s circus”
https://nonvenipacem.com/2019/11/22/the-throne-of-peter-has-a-demonic-spawn-squatting-on-it-orchestrating-hells-circus/
Letter of Saint Athanasius to His Flock (4th Century A.D.)
“May God console you! … What saddens you … is the fact that
others have occupied the churches by violence, while during this time you are
on the outside. It is a fact that they have the premises — but you have the
Apostolic Faith. They can occupy our churches, but they are outside the true
Faith. You remain outside the places of worship, but the Faith dwells within
you. Let us consider: what is more important, the place or the Faith? The true
Faith, obviously. Who has lost and who has won in the struggle — the one who
keeps the premises or the one who keeps the Faith?
True, the premises are good when the Apostolic Faith is
preached there; they are holy if everything takes place there in a holy way …
You are the ones who are happy; you who remain within the
Church by your Faith, who hold firmly to the foundations of the Faith which has
come down to you from Apostolic Tradition. And if an execrable jealousy has
tried to shake it on a number of occasions, it has not succeeded. They are the
ones who have broken away from it in the present crisis.
No one, ever, will prevail against your Faith, beloved
Brothers. And we believe that God will give us our churches back some day.
Thus, the more violently they try to occupy the places of
worship, the more they separate themselves from the Church. They claim that
they represent the Church; but in reality, they are the ones who are expelling
themselves from it and going astray.
Even if Catholics faithful to Tradition are reduced to a
handful, they are the ones who are the true Church of Jesus Christ.”
(Coll. selecta SS. Eccl. Patrum, Caillau and Guillou, Vol.
32, pp. 411-412)
Labels:
Blogs and Bloggers,
More Bergoglian heresy
Friday 22 November 2019
Viganò, Pope is subjecting Church to ‘powerful forces’ that want world government
Archbishop Carlo Viganò calls out Bergoglio as the Globalist dupe that he is.
A monster. A man who hates Christ, faithful Catholics and the Nation-State.
https://www.lifesitenews.com/opinion/abp-vigano-pope-is-subjecting-church-to-powerful-forces-that-want-world-government
A monster. A man who hates Christ, faithful Catholics and the Nation-State.
https://www.lifesitenews.com/opinion/abp-vigano-pope-is-subjecting-church-to-powerful-forces-that-want-world-government
Labels:
Carlo Maria Viganò,
More Bergoglian heresy
Thursday 21 November 2019
Bishop Athanasius Schneider: Pachamama was worshiped at Vatican and it wasn’t harmless
Bishop Athanasius Schneider has written an article for Kath.net and has authorised an approved English translation at LifeSiteNews.
His Excellency lays out the idolatry and blasphemy committed by Bergoglio and the others over the worship of pagan deities in Rome. It reads as a lawyer's opening statement in a devastating trial. He has convicted Jorge Mario Bergoglio and others of being the false prophets that they are and even worse. They are devils.
"For all of the gods of the gentiles are devils; and the LORD made the heavens."
"Blessed be the name of the LORD."
Read all of this at:
https://www.lifesitenews.com/opinion/bishop-athanasius-schneider-pachamama-was-worshiped-at-vatican-and-it-wasnt-harmless
His Excellency lays out the idolatry and blasphemy committed by Bergoglio and the others over the worship of pagan deities in Rome. It reads as a lawyer's opening statement in a devastating trial. He has convicted Jorge Mario Bergoglio and others of being the false prophets that they are and even worse. They are devils.
"For all of the gods of the gentiles are devils; and the LORD made the heavens."
"Blessed be the name of the LORD."
https://www.lifesitenews.com/opinion/bishop-athanasius-schneider-pachamama-was-worshiped-at-vatican-and-it-wasnt-harmless
Friday 15 November 2019
BERGOLIO DECLARES FAITHFUL CATHOLICS TO BE "NAZIS" - INVENTS NEW "SIN"
In a stunning statement, Jorge Bergoglio has labelled faithful Catholics who speak out against sodomitical behaviour and the political agenda of homosexualism as "NAZIS"
He is playing us, he is psychologically projecting.
It is Bergoglio that is the NAZI.
“It is no coincidence that in these times, emblems and actions typical of Nazism reappear, which, with its persecutions against Jews, gypsies and people of homosexual orientation, represents the negative model par excellence of a culture of waste and hatred, and I must confess to you that when I hear a speech [by] someone responsible for order or for a government, I think of speeches by Hitler in 1934, 1936. In the last century we saw so many brutalities against the Jewish people, and we were all convinced that this was over. But today the habit of persecuting the Jews, brothers and sisters, is here reborn. This is neither human nor Christian."
More can be read here.
Who is this pontificating pervert protector speaking of? Is it this writer? Is it you, dear reader?
Who is this pontificating pervert protector speaking of? Is it this writer? Is it you, dear reader?
The man is a sociopath, he never names his target but only makes innuendo. This is of Christ? This is a pastor?
He continued on to declare the "sin" against the environment in keeping with his recent pagan worship of "mother-earth"
If that is not enough, he reiterated his rejection of a life sentence in prison which he has done numerous times before.
This man is not of Christ. He is evil. That is plain to see. He hates Our Lord Jesus Christ, he refused to genuflect or kneel before the Most Blessed Sacrament of the Altar but he sanctioned and attended the literal worship of a pagan idol.
It is without a doubt in the mind of this writer that Jorge Bergoglio is most perfectly possessed. He is a megalomaniac. A nasty, brutish, pompous dictator.
He is playing us, he is psychologically projecting.
It is Bergoglio that is the NAZI.
It is Bergoglio that is the coprophiliac.
And nobody confronts this evil monster to his face.
Labels:
More Bergoglian heresy
Tuesday 12 November 2019
Protest against Pope Francis's sacrilegious acts
I add my name.
We the undersigned Catholic clergy and lay scholars protest against and condemn the sacrilegious and superstitious acts committed by Pope Francis, the Successor of Peter, in connection with the recent Amazon Synod held in Rome.
These sacrilegious acts are the following:
On October 4, Pope Francis attended an act of idolatrous
worship of the pagan goddess Pachamama.
He allowed this worship to take place in the Vatican
Gardens, thus desecrating the vicinity of the graves of the martyrs and of the
church of the Apostle Peter.
He participated in this act of idolatrous worship by
blessing a wooden image of Pachamama.
On October 7, the idol of Pachamama was placed in front of
the main altar at St. Peter’s and then carried in procession to the Synod Hall.
Pope Francis said prayers in a ceremony involving this image and then joined in
this procession.
When wooden images of this pagan deity were removed from the
church of Santa Maria in Traspontina, where they had been sacrilegiously
placed, and thrown into the Tiber by Catholics outraged by this profanation of
the church, Pope Francis, on October 25, apologized for their removal and
another wooden image of Pachamama was returned to the church. Thus, a new profanation was initiated.
On October 27, in the closing Mass for the synod, he
accepted a bowl used in the idolatrous worship of Pachamama and placed it on
the altar.
Pope Francis himself confirmed that these wooden images were
pagan idols. In his apology for the removal of these idols from a Catholic
church, he specifically called them Pachamama,
a name for a false goddess of mother earth according to pagan religious
belief in South America.
Different features of these proceedings have been condemned
as idolatrous or sacrilegious by Cardinal Walter Brandmüller, Cardinal Gerhard
Müller, Cardinal Jorge Urosa Savino, Archbishop Carlo Maria Viganò, Bishop
Athanasius Schneider, Bishop José Luis Azcona Hermoso, Bishop Rudolf
Voderholzer, and Bishop Marian Eleganti.
Lastly, Card. Raymond Burke has given the same assessment of this cult
in an interview.
This participation in idolatry was anticipated by the
statement entitled “Document on Human Fraternity”, signed by Pope Francis and
Ahmad Al-Tayyeb, the Grand Imam of Al-Azhar Mosque, on February 4, 2019. This statement asserted that:
“The pluralism and the diversity of religions, colour, sex,
race and language are willed by God in His wisdom, through which He created
human beings. This divine wisdom is the source from which the right to freedom
of belief and the freedom to be different derives.”
Pope Francis’s involvement in idolatrous ceremonies is an
indication that he meant this statement in a heterodox sense, which allows
pagan worship of idols to be considered a good positively willed by God.
Moreover, despite privately advising Bishop Athanasius
Schneider that “You [the Bishop] can say that the phrase in question on the
diversity of religions means the permissive will of God…” , Francis has never
corrected the Abu Dhabi statement accordingly. In his subsequent audience address of April 3,
2019 Francis, answering the question “Why does God permit that there are so
many religions?”, referred in passing to the “permissive will of God” as
explained by Scholastic theology, but gave the concept a positive meaning,
declaring that “God wanted to permit this” because while “there are so many
religions” they “always look to heaven, they look to God (emphasis
added).” There is not the slightest
suggestion that God permits the existence of false religions in the same way He
permits the existence of evil generally.
Rather, the clear implication is that God permits the existence of “so
many religions” because they are good in that they “always look to heaven, they
look to God.”
Worse, Pope Francis has since confirmed the uncorrected Abu
Dhabi statement by establishing an “interfaith committee”, which later received the official name of
“Higher Committee,” located in the
United Arab Emirates, to promote the “goals” of the document; and promoting a
directive issued by the Pontifical Council for Interreligious Dialogue
addressed to the heads of all the Roman Catholic institutes of higher studies,
and indirectly to Catholic university professors, asking that they give the
“widest possible dissemination to the document", including its uncorrected
assertion that God wills the “diversity of religions” just as He wills the
diversity of color, sex, race and language.
The rendering of worship to anyone or anything other than
the one true God, the Blessed Trinity, is a violation of the First Commandment.
Absolutely all participation in any form of the veneration of idols is
condemned by this Commandment and is an objectively grave sin, independently of
the subjective culpability, that only God can judge.
St. Paul taught the early Church that the sacrifice offered
to pagan idols was not offered to God but rather to the demons when he said in
his First Letter to the Corinthians:
“What then? Do I say, that what is offered in sacrifice to
idols, is any thing? Or, that the idol is any thing? But the things which the
heathens sacrifice, they sacrifice to demons, and not to God. And I would not
that you should be made partakers with demons. You cannot drink the chalice of
the Lord, and the chalice of demons: you cannot be partakers of the table of
the Lord, and of the table of demons.”
(1 Cor. 10:19-21)
By these actions Pope Francis has incurred the reproach
uttered by the Second Council of Nicaea:
“Many pastors have destroyed my vine, they have defiled my
portion. For they followed unholy men and trusting to their own frenzies they
calumniated the holy Church, which Christ our God has espoused to himself, and
they failed to distinguish the holy from the profane, asserting that the icons
of our Lord and of his saints were no different from the wooden images of
satanic idols.”
With immense sorrow and deep love for the Chair of Peter, we
beg Almighty God to spare the guilty members of His Church on earth the
punishment that they deserve for these terrible sins.
We respectfully ask Pope Francis to repent publicly and
unambiguously of these objectively grave sins and of all the public offences
that he has committed against God and the true religion, and to make reparation
for these offences.
We respectfully ask all the bishops of the Catholic Church
to offer fraternal correction to Pope Francis for these scandals, and to warn
their flocks that according to the divinely revealed teaching of the Catholic
faith, they will risk eternal damnation if they follow his example of offending
against the First Commandment.
November 9th, 2019
In Festo dedicationis Basilicae Lateranensis
“Terribilis est locus iste: hic domus Dei est et porta cæli;
et vocabitur aula Dei”
Protest against Pope Francis's sacrilegious acts
Dr Gerard J.M. van den Aardweg, The Netherlands
Dr Robert Adams, medical physician in Emergency & Family
Medicine
Donna F. Bethell, J.D.
Tom Bethell, senior editor of The American Spectator and
book author
Dr Biagio Buonomo, PhD in Ancient Christianity History and
former culture columnist (1990-2013) for L'Osservatore Romano
François Billot de Lochner, President of Liberté politique,
France
Rev. Deacon Andrew Carter B.Sc. (Hons.) ARCS DipPFS Leader,
Marriage & Family Life Commission, Diocese of Portsmouth, England
Mr. Robert Cassidy, STL
Dr Michael Cawley, PhD, Psychologist, Former University
Instructor, Pennsylvania, USA
Dr Erick Chastain, PhD, Postdoctoral Research Associate,
Department of Psychiatry, University of Wisconsin-Madison
Fr Linus F Clovis
Lynn Colgan Cohen, M.A., O.F.S.
Dr Colin H. Jory, MA, PhD, Historian, Canberra, Australia
Rev Edward B. Connolly, Pastor Emeritus, St. Joseph Parish
St. Vincent de Paul Parish, Girardville PA
Prof. Roberto de Mattei, Former Professor of the History of
Christianity, European University of Rome, former Vice President of the
National Research Council (CNR)
José Florencio Domínguez, philologist and translator
Deacon Nick Donnelly, MA Catholic Pastoral & Educational
Studies (Spiritual Formation), England
Fr Thomas Edward Dorn, pastor of Holy Redeemer Parish in New
Bremen OH in the Archdiocese of Cincinnati
Fr Stefan Dreher FSSP, Stuttgart, Germany
Dr Michael B. Ewbank, PhD in Philosophy, Loras College,
retired, USA
Fr Jerome Fasano, Pastor, St John the Baptist Church, Front
Royal, Virginia, USA
Dr James Fennessy, MA, MSW, JD, LCSW, Matawan, New Jersey,
USA
Christopher A. Ferrara, J.D., Founding President of the
American Catholic Lawyers’ Association
Fr Jay Finelli, Tiverton, RI, USA
Prof. Michele Gaslini, Professor of Public Law, University
of Udine, Italy
Dr Linda M. Goulash, M.D.
Dr Maria Guarini STB, Pontificia Università Seraphicum,
Rome; editor of the website Chiesa e postconcilio
Fr Brian W. Harrison, OS, STD, associate professor of
theology of the Pontifical Catholic University of Puerto Rico (retired),
Scholar-in-Residence, Oblates of Wisdom Study Center, St. Louis, Missouri, USA
Sarah Henderson DCHS MA (RE & Catechetics) BA (Mus)
Prof. Robert Hickson PhD, Retired Professor of Literature
and of Strategic-Cultural Studies
Dr Maike Hickson PhD, Writer and Journalist
Prof., Dr.rer.pol., Dr.rer.nat. Rudolf Hilfer, Professor of
Theoretical Physics at Universität Stuttgart
Fr John Hunwicke, Former Senior Research Fellow, Pusey
House, Oxford
Fr Edward J. Kelty, OS, JCD, Defensor Vinculi, SRNC rota
romana 2001-19, Former Judicial Vicar,
Archdiocese of Ferrara, Judge, Archdiocese of Ferrara
Dr Ivo Kerže, prof. phil.
Dr Thomas Klibengajtis, former Assistant Professor of
Catholic Systematic Theology, Institute of Catholic Theology, Technical
University Dresden, Germany
Dr Peter A. Kwasniewski, PhD, USA
Dr John Lamont, DPhil (Oxon.)
Dr Dorotea Lancellotti, catechist, co-founder of the website:
https://cooperatores-veritatis.org/
Dr Ester Ledda, consecrated laywoman, co-founder of the
website https://cooperatores-veritatis.org/
Fr Patrick Magee, FLHF a Franciscan of Our Lady of the Holy
Family, canonical hermit in the Diocese of Fall River, Massachusetts
Dr Carlo Manetti, jurist and lecturer, Italy
Dr Christopher Manion, PhD, KM, Humanae Vitae Coalition,
Front Royal, Virginia, USA
Antonio Marcantonio, MA
Michael J. Matt, Editor, The Remnant, USA
Jean-Pierre Maugendre, general delegate, Renaissance
catholique, France
Msgr John F. McCarthy, JCD, STD, retired professor of moral
theology, Pontifical Lateran University
Prof. Brian M. McCall, Orpha and Maurice Merrill Professor
in Law, Special Advisor to the Provost for Online Education, University of
Oklahoma
Patricia McKeever, B.Ed. M.Th., Editor, Catholic Truth,
Scotland
Mary Angela McMenamin, MA in Biblical Theology from John
Paul the Great Catholic University
Fr Cor Mennen, lecturer canon law at the diocesan Seminary
of ‘s-Hertogenbosch and member of the cathedral chapter
Rev Michael Menner, Pastor
Dr Stéphane Mercier, Ph.D., S.T.B., former research fellow
and lecturer at the University of Louvain
David Moss, President, Association of Hebrew Catholics, St.
Louis, Missouri
Dr Claude E Newbury, M.B. B.Ch., D.T.M & H., D.P.H.,
D.O.H., M.F.G.P., D.C.H., D.A., M. Prax Med.
Prof. Giorgio Nicolini, writer, Director of “Tele Maria”
Fr John O'Neill, STB, Dip TST, Priest of the Diocese of
Parramatta, member of Australian Society of Authors
Fr Guy Pagès, Archdiocese of Paris, France
Prof. Paolo Pasqualucci, Professor of Philosophy (retired),
University of Perugia, Italy
Fr Dean P. Perri, Diocese of Providence, Our Lady of Loreto
Church
Dr Brian Charles Phillips, MD
Dr Mary Elizabeth Phillips, MD
Dr Robert Phillips, Professor (emeritus) Philosophy: Oxford
University, Wesleyan University, University of Connecticut
Prof. Claudio Pierantoni, Professor of Medieval Philosophy,
University of Chile; former Professor of Church History and Patrology at the
Pontifical Catholic University of Chile
Prof. Enrico Maria Radaelli, Professor of Aesthetic
Philosophy and Director of the Department of
Aesthetic Philosophy of the International Science and Commonsense
Association (ISCA), Rome, Italy
Dr Carlo Regazzoni, Philosopher of Culture, Therwill,
Switzerland
Prof. John Rist, Professor emeritus of Classics and
Philosophy, University of Toronto
Dr Ivan M. Rodriguez, PhD
Fr Luis Eduardo Rodrìguez Rodríguez, Pastor, Diocesan
Catholic Priest, Caracas, Venezuela.
John F. Salza, Esq.
Fr Timothy Sauppé, S.T.L., pastor of St. Mary’s (Westville,
IL.) and St. Isaac Jogues (Georgetown, IL.)
Fr John Saward, Priest of the Archdiocese of Birmingham,
England
Prof. Dr Josef Seifert, Director of the Dietrich von
Hildebrand Institute of Philosophy, at the Gustav Siewerth Akademie,
Bierbronnen, Germany
Mary Shivanandan, Author and consultant
Dr Cristina Siccardi, Church Historian and author
Dr Anna M. Silvas, senior research adjunct, University of
New England NSW Australia.
Jeanne Smits, journalist, writer, France
Dr Stephen Sniegoski, PhD, historian and book author
Dr Zlatko Šram, PhD, Croatian Center for Applied Social
Research
Henry Sire, Church historian and book author, England
Robert J. Siscoe, author
Abbé Guillaume de Tanoüarn, Doctor of Literature
Rev Glen Tattersall, Parish Priest, Parish of St. John Henry
Newman, Australia
Gloria, Princess of Thurn und Taxis, Regensburg, Germany
Prof. Giovanni Turco, associate professor of Philosophy of
Public Law, University of Udine, Italy
Fr Frank Unterhalt, Pastor, Archdiocese of Paderborn,
Germany
José Antonio Ureta, author
Adrie A.M. van der Hoeven, MSc, physicist
Dr Gerd J. Weisensee, Msc, Switzerland
John-Henry Westen, MA, Co-Founder and Editor-in-Chief
LifeSiteNews.com
Dr Elizabeth C. Wilhelmsen, Ph.D. in Hispanic Literature,
University of Nebraska-Lincoln, retired
Willy Wimmer, Secretary of State, Ministry of Defense,
(ret.), Germany
Prof. em. Dr Hubert Windisch, priest and theologian, Germany
Mo Woltering, MTS, Headmaster, Holy Family Academy,
Manassas, Virginia, USA
Miguel Ángel Yáñez, editor of Adelante la Fe
Monday 11 November 2019
Nuncio to the U.S.A. demands obedience to the Francis Magisterium
Christophe Pierre, the Apostolic Nuncio to the United States has spoken at the USCCB Central Committee demanding that all bow down and adore at the name of Francis and his magisterium.
So now, we have the "Francis Magisterium."
Pierre can follow Bergoglio straight into Hell.
Where they both belong.
So now, we have the "Francis Magisterium."
Pierre can follow Bergoglio straight into Hell.
Where they both belong.
Labels:
Christophe Pierre,
More Bergoglian heresy,
USCCB
At the going down of the sun and in the morning we will remember them.
They shall grow not old, as we that are left grow old:
Age shall not weary them, nor the years condemn.
At the going down of the sun and in the morning
We will remember them.
We will remember them.
Labels:
Remembrance Day
Sunday 10 November 2019
Fascists/Communists/Socialists attack Church in Chile
Other than Breitbart and Fox News where is this in the media?
Interesting coincidence? The same date as the November Pogroms against our Jewish brothers and sisters in Germany - Kristallnacht.
Interesting coincidence? The same date as the November Pogroms against our Jewish brothers and sisters in Germany - Kristallnacht.
Has Bergoglio made comment?
Labels:
Anti-Catholic Bigotry
POPE SACHS CHURCH: Vatican Embraces United Nations Goals
Bergoglio hugs Bono.
La cage aux folles.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)