Jorge goes ga-ga and whores out the papal office!

Which idiot working in the Vatican thought this was a good idea?

Was it Greg Burke?

Antonio Spadaro, S.J.?

Was it Jorge himself?

Nothing like whoring out the papal office, eh, Jorge?

"Great sporting events like today's Super Bowl are highly symbolic, showing that it is possible to build a culture of encounter and a world of peace. By participating in sport, we are able to go beyond our own self-interest - and in a healthy way, we learn to sacrifice - to grow in fidelity and respect the rules. May this year's Super Bowl be a sign of peace, friendship and solidarity to the world. Thank you."

Wait, did I read that correctly, "respect for rules?"

So, Jorge, the NFL players are applauded for respecting the "rules" but you call Catholics "rigid" and other names for respecting the commandments of Christ?

Did anyone tell Jorge who the entertainment is during the half-time?

And I am to show respect to you and your office when you show nothing but disdain for it?

Oh well, no whore-eh, like an old whore-eh"

Next time George, consider who you appear with.

Whoa whoa I'm in love with Juda-as, Juda-as

Whoa whoa I'm in love with Juda-as, Juda-as

Juda-as! Juda-ah-as! Judas! Juda-ah-as

Juda-as! Juda-ah-as! Judas! Ga-ah ga-ah

Juda-as! Juda-ah-as! Judas! Juda-ah-as

Juda-as! Juda-ah-as! Judas! Ga-ah ga-ah

When he calls to me, I am ready

I'll wash his feet with my hair if he needs

Forgive him when his tongue lies through his brain

Even after three times he betrays me

Ah oh I'll bring him down, bring him down, down

Ah oh a king with no crown, king with no crown

I'm just a holy fool,

Oh baby it's so cruel but

I'm still in love with Judas baby

I'm just a Holy Fool, oh baby it's so cruel

But I'm still in love with Judas baby

Whoa whoa I'm in love with Juda-as, Juda-as

Whoa whoa I'm in love with Juda-as, Juda-as

Juda-as!…

They have sown weeds

Today, according to the most proper and meet Roman Calendar it is the Fifth Sunday after Epiphany. The gospel today is the "wheat and tares," from the Holy Gospel of Our Lord Jesus Christ, according to Saint Matthew, beginning at chapter 13: 24-30.

At that time, Jesus spake this parable unto the crowds, saying: The kingdom of heaven is likened unto a man which sowed good seed in his field:  but while men slept, his enemy came and sowed tares among the wheat, and went his way.  But when the blade was sprung up, and brought forth fruit, then appeared the tares also.  So the servants of the householder came and said unto him, Sir, didst not thou sow good seed in thy field? from whence then hath it tares?  He said unto them, An enemy hath done this. The servants said unto him, Wilt thou then that we go and gather them up?  But he said, Nay; lest while ye gather up the tares, ye root up also the wheat with them.  Let both grow together until the harvest: and in the time of harvest I will say to the reapers, Gather ye together first the tares, and bind them in bundles to burn them: but gather the wheat into my barn.

From the very codification of the Mass itself by St. Gregory the Great, Pope from 590-604, until Annibale Bugnini and Giovanni Montini in 1969, this is the Gospel that you would have heard on this Sunday, (unless transferred to November due to the movable date of Easter). Who were these men to deny you what the Church has always read and prayed on this day?

Who were these men to deny the priests and religious and lay faithful who pray the Office the following? From the very foundation of the monastic life and the compilation of the venerable and proper Office of Matins; for over one thousand years, - one thousand years on this day, the readings reflecting on the Gospel above were chosen from St. Augustine of Hippo. Again, Bugnini and Montini knew better than those who prayed more than a millennium of Catholic prayer since the early Benedictine offices most likely structured by St. Benedict of Norcia. 

Perhaps if our Shepherds today, including the Bishop of Rome, read this today, they would be struck with fear of death and judgement, or perhaps not.

In this parable the Lord hath reference to the time when the Shepherds of the Church should begin to wax careless, (or, it may be, to the time when the Apostles should fall asleep in the sleep of death,) at which time, the devil would come and sow that which the Lord calleth a seed of evil-doers.  Now, is this seed of evil-doers a reference to hereticks or to Catholics of bad lives?  It certainly is not unjust to call the hereticks a seed of evil-doers, seeing that they have sprung up from the seed of the Gospel, and have been begotten in the Name of Christ, and afterwards have turned into crooked ways and lying doctrines. 

But since it is written that this seed was sown in the midst of the wheat, we ought perhaps to understand thereby a reference to such as are of one Communion with the righteous.  However, inasmuch as the Lord saith: The field is the world: and doth not thereby directly speak of the Church, we may with good reason understand the seed of evil-doers to be the hereticks, since in this world they are mingled together with the good, not in one common Communion, but only under one common name of Christian.  And Catholics of bad lives, which nevertheless are of one Faith with the good seed, and yet are themselves worthless, may more fitly be likened to straw than to tares, since the straw springeth from one soil and one root with the good grain-bearing ear of corn. 

However, as touching the net cast into the sea, and enclosing a great multitude of fishes, both bad and good, we may well understand that by the bad are meant Catholics of bad lives.  For the sea is one thing whereby we may understand to be signified the world; and the net another, which seemeth to signify our Faith, or the Communion of one Church.  Between hereticks and sinful Catholics there is this difference: hereticks believe a lie: sinful Catholics believe the truth, but live not what they believe.

The importance cannot be stressed enough. Leave the Novus Ordo Missae and get thyself to the Mass of the Ages, Diocesan, FSSP, ICK and if no other choice, the SSPX. Pray the Office according to the proper form, http://divinumofficium.com/ or http://www.breviary.mobi/ and leave the decapitated and debased Liturgy of the Hours behind. Strengthen yourself and your family for what is coming.

If you must stay within the Novus Ordo, then go to the quietest Mass you can find, early on a Sunday morning with no music and no shenanigans. Pray it with the Roman Missal of 1962 or earlier, receive the Blessed Sacrament only on the tongue and kneeling if you can. 

The time has come to grow strong against the weeds.

Bergoglio's Porn producing German Masters implement his heresy

Jorge Bergoglio's Amoris Laetitia's most heretical interpretation has now been implemented in Germany. 

Holy Communion will now be provided to those Catholics living in adulterous civil marriages. Can the sanction of sodomite, so-called "marriage" and the sacraments be far into the future? After all, isn't it now discrimination? 

Let us face the facts, the Pope's actions in Amoris Laetitia are heretical; they are sacrilegious, sinful and blasphemous. 

The great majority of bishops and cardinals in the Church are faithless and despicable cowards for not confronting the Bishop of Rome.

The world is burning from a lack of faith and from terror. Pornography, abortion, sexual perversion, murder, greed, terror, human trafficking, drug abuse - all of these are the fault of the Pope and his episcopacy. Why? Because a Catholic Church that does not preach the Truth and proclaim Christ will allow the darkness of the world to rise against It and us. 

Rather than preach the Truth, Bergoglio and his henchmen have codified a lie. 

From the Catholic Herald.

Council of German bishops endorses Communion for the remarried

The group did not include Cardinal Gerhard Müller, who has said the practice is against God's law

The permanent council of the German bishops’ conference has endorsed Communion for the remarried, in the same week as the Vatican’s doctrinal chief said the practice was against divine law.

In a new statement agreed by the council, which numbers 27 out of the 66 German bishops, they say that the remarried can receive Communion without resolving to live “as brother and sister”. They say this is possible through “Differentiated solutions which are appropriate to the individual case”. An accompanying statement says the solution will be found through “a decision-making process, accompanied by a priest”.

The permanent council does not include the Vatican’s doctrinal chief, Cardinal Gerhard Muller, who in a recent interview said that the practice was against divine law.

In Familiaris Consortio (1981), St John Paul II said the remarried could only receive Communion if they tried to live “in complete continence”. The same doctrine has been taught by Benedict XVI, reaffirming centuries of Church teaching.

The cardinal said that the teaching reaffirmed by St John Paul II in Familiaris Consortio was not just one pope’s teaching, but something which could not be changed by any bishop, pope, or even an angel.

He added that some bishops were diverging from Catholic doctrine, and so risked becoming “the blind leading the blind”.

The permanent council of German bishops proposed Communion for the remarried in 2014, saying that it was “ a test of the Church’s credibility”. Several German bishops distanced themselves from the 2014 statement.

At the subsequent Synod on the Family, bishops did not approve the proposal. But since the Pope’s document Amoris Laetitia, some bishops have suggested Communion for the remarried is now possible.

In his recent interview, Cardinal Müller said: “Amoris Laetitia must clearly be interpreted in the light of the whole doctrine of the Church,” adding: “it is not right that so many bishops are interpreting Amoris Laetitia according to their way of understanding the Pope’s teaching.”

Basta Bergoglio, Basta!

"Hey Francis,  you police congregations, priests are removed, (you have) decapitated the Order of Malta and the Franciscans (Friars of the Immaculate), ignored Cardinals ... 

but where is your mercy?"

Look upon the face of the Sister Lucia "the Heretic" Caram. To her, the Blessed Virgin Mary, wasn't!

There are many names I could call this woman.

A holy sister is not one.

None of them are publishable.

https://twitter.com/sorluciacaram

https://www.rt.com/viral/375988-catholic-nun-virgin-mary-sex/

A Catholic nun in Spain has caused outrage after she suggested that the Virgin Mary may not have been a virgin after all. The controversial Dominican nun invited the ire of the Catholic Church who responded to her statements in anger.
Sister Lucia Caram was speaking on a talk show over the weekend when she let slip her belief that contradicts one of the key pillars of her faith.

“I think that Mary was in love with Joseph and that they were a normal couple, and the normal thing is to have sex,” Caram told Risto Mejideon during Sunday’s Chester in Love programme.

According to Roman Catholic faith, the Virgin Mary is believed to have become pregnant with Jesus, the son of God, by immaculate conception. (Okay, let's all figure the writer is just ignorant. Vox)

"It’s hard to believe and to take in. We’ve stuck with rules that we have invented without reaching the true message,” she added.

Sister Carman’s remarks were denounced by the Bishop of Vic, who issued a statement reminding people that Mary’s virginity was not up for debate.

“The belief that Mary was a perpetual virgin forms part of the faith of Church from its beginnings and that this truth of faith was collected and proclaimed by the Second Council of Constantinople, being the primary Marian dogma observed by Catholic and Orthodox Christians," he said. “Such statements do not conform to the faith of the Church.”

Sister Lucia is no stranger to controversy. The nun has over 180,000 followers on Twitter and is a vocal supporter of Catalan independence. She has appeared on numerous chat shows and cooking programs.

She also aired her views on sex during the Risto Mejideon show. “Sex is a way of expressing feelings and love and forms a part of all people,” she said. "The Church has treated the subject as dirty and secret but I think it is a blessing”.

Mejide also asked her whether she masturbates. “Just as I told you that I am a virgin and that I have never had sex, I also tell you that I do not masturbate," she replied.

Phew, I'm so glad to know that Sister doesn't' engage in self-abuse.

Bergoglio appeals to local Churches to protect the planet, forgetting the True Mission and casting his "pearls before swine!"

More globalist, Marxist bile out of the mouth of Bergoglio.  Does this man have any faith left? Does he beleive in the supernatural? Is God anything to this man?

The Church's mission is the salvation of souls. He mocks Christ.

O God, free your people from the enslavement by these wicked men. 

And he indeed hath possessed a field of the reward of iniquity, and being hanged, burst asunder in the midst: and all his bowels gushed out. 19And it became known to all the inhabitants of Jerusalem: so that the same field was called in their tongue, Haceldama, that is to say, The field of blood. For it is written in the book of Psalms: Let their habitation become desolate, and let there be none to dwell therein. And his bishopric let another take. Acts 1: 18-20

Climate: Pope Appeals to Local Churches to Mobilize

He Encourages the Global Catholic Climate Movement

FEBRUARY 1, 2017 ANNE KURIAN GENERAL AUDIENCE 

Zenit

On February 1, 2017, the Pope appealed to local Churches to mobilize for the protection of the planet.

In the course of the General Audience in the Vatican’s Paul VI Hall, he greeted the delegation of the Global Catholic Climate Movement (GCCM). The objective of the Movement is, notably, to sensitize Catholics through its networks, to promote ecological conversion “towards a low carbon society” and to require leaders to “engage in an ambitious climatic action.”

He thanked them for their “engagement in protecting our common home, in these times of grave socio-environmental crisis.”

“I encourage you to continue to weave networks so that the local Churches will respond with determination to the cry of the earth and the cry of the poor,” continued the Pontiff.

In the crowd, the GCCM delegation waved banners greeting Pope Francis’ encyclical on integral ecology: “Cheers for Laudato Si’.”

Translation by Virginia Forrester

Bergoglio rescued Knights of Malta Grand Chancellor Albrecht Boeselager blames Cardinal Burke

The condom distributing Boeselager of the Knights of Malta has blamed Cardinal Raymond Burke for the Order's crisis.


He went so far as to disclose a threat: 

“I think we cannot foresee and we will not make comments on what will happen to Cardinal Burke in the future. That remains the decision of the Holy Father,”

Feel free to make Cardinal Burke a white martyr of the faith, but before you do Jorge, consider this.

On February 1, Milo Yiannopolis was scheduled to speak to a few hundred. Violent fascist protesters in Berkeley gave him an audience of tens of millions.

This blog had a few hundred thousand readers after ten years until Tom Rosica, that brilliant media-savvy clericalist came along. Now, it has a growing international audience.

These occurrences are known as the Streisand Effect.

Go ahead, it will be the real Francis Effect. Take away his red hat. 

You'll only make him a greater saint.

As for the Knights of Malta, I feel great sorrow for two of my friends who are Knights, here in Toronto. 

https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/pope-backed-knights-of-malta-leader-on-condom-promotion-my-conscience-is-cl

The Commandments of God block grace and cause you to sin against memory. Yes, Bergoglio really said that.

Are we to conclude that Jorge Bergoglio is manic-depressive, bi-polar?

Is he suffering from some advancing form of dementia?

Could he be under the influence of a demon?

Because no priest, no Pope who truly loves Christ and His people would speak such sheer and utter lunacy.

The Pope is an embarrassment. He is a disgrace and there is no other way to say it. His "homilies" are incoherent blathering of a corrupted theology. He is insulting  and degrading to faithful Catholics. 

It is time for the Cardinal and Bishops to act. No, the time has long past.

Not only is the man responsible for disunity and propagating heresy and sacrilege, he is nothing more than a verbally abusive bully.

And when he says "forward," remember this. That words matter, they matter very much, indeed.

SUMMARY OF PAPAL HOMILY IN ENGLISH

(Source: Vatican Radio)

"‘Brothers, call to mind those first days’: the days of enthusiasm, of going forward in the faith, when you began to live the faith, the anguished trials… You don’t understand the Christian life, even the spiritual life of each day, without memory. Not only do you not understand: You can’t live in a Christian way without memory. The memory of the salvation of God in my life, the memory of my troubles in my life; but how has the Lord saved me from these troubles? Memory is a grace: a grace to ask for. ‘Lord, may I not forget your step in my life, may I not forget the good moments, also the ugly; the joys and the crosses.’ The Christian is a man of memory.”

"Hope: Looking to the future. Just as one cannot live a Christian life without memory of the steps taken, one cannot live a Christian life without looking to the future with hope… of the encounter with the Lord. And he uses a beautiful phrase: ‘just a brief moment…’ Eh, life is a breath, eh? It passes. When one is young, he thinks he has so much time before him, but then life teaches us that those words that we all say: ‘But how time passes! I knew this person as a child, now they’re getting married! How time passes!’ It comes soon. But the hope of encountering it is a life in tension, between memory and hope, the past and the future.”

"‘Not taking risks, please, no… prudence…’ All the commandments, all of them… Yes, it’s true, but this paralyzes you too, it makes you forget so many graces received, it takes away memory, it takes away hope, because it doesn’t allow you to go forward. And the present of a Christian, of such a Christian, is how when one goes along the street and an unexpected rain comes, and the garment is not so good and the fabric shrinks… Confined souls… This is faintheartedness: this is the sin against memory, courage, patience, and hope. May the Lord make us grow in memory, make us grow in hope, give us courage and patience each and free us from that which is faintheartedness, being afraid of everything…  Confined souls in order to save ourselves. And Jesus says: ‘He who wills to save his life will lose it.’”

http://www.romereports.com/2017/01/27/pope-in-santa-marta-explains-the-sins-that-paralyze-christians

Pope Francis, the "Pope of seeds"

Methinks they're getting worried that their whole rotten filthy plan is coming crashing down.

Remember Tony, some seeds sprout poison ivy!

Please be sure to Tweet to him, and give him my regards. Since I've been #BlockedbySpadaro and am a founding member of the #SpadaroBlockParty.

https://twitter.com/antoniospadaro

CDF Prefect Cardinal Gerhard Müller has answers the Dubia, and contradicts Bergoglio. Will he be "burked?"

The Cardinal Prefect of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith has been interviewed in the Italian magazine, Il Timone. The Cardinal Prefect, whilst not directly, essentially upholds Catholic doctrine and answers the dubia.

Yet, the recent dubia issued by the Cardinals cannot be answered in a magazine but must be answered officially and formally by the Congregation or by the Pope himself. Until that time comes, there can be no letting up on the pressure to ensure that Pope Bergoglio "confirms his brothers in the faith." 

The Bishops of Malta, the Vicar of Rome, the Bishops of Buenos Aires, and various dioceses in the United States and elsewhere are pointedly criticised by Müller. Yet, if those bishops think that they are doing the Pope's bidding, then it is the document that is defective, and the Pope who is wrong. 

What must happen to these bishops, if Müller is faithful to Christ and his role as guardian of doctrine, is a formal correction to these bishops by him and in the Pope's name. Given the confusion and diabolical disorientation, the correction must really come from the Pope himself. 

But will the ever-humble Bergoglio yield? Will he repent of his error and correct himself and the wayward bishops? Or will he remove Cardinal Müller, along soon perhaps with Cardinal Burke, and further entrench what has become a dictatorship, a Peronist lead scandal upon the Holy Church of Christ.

Time will tell; but rest assured, Christ will not be mocked by anyone, let alone his Vicar!

http://magister.blogautore.espresso.repubblica.it/2017/02/01/the-pope-is-silent-but-cardinal-muller-speaks-who-responds-to-the-%E2%80%9Cdubia%E2%80%9D-this-way/

Q - Can there be a contradiction between doctrine and personal conscience?

A: (Cardinal Müller) No, that is impossible. For example, it cannot be said that there are circumstances according to which an act of adultery does not constitute a mortal sin. For Catholic doctrine, it is impossible for mortal sin to coexist with sanctifying grace. In order to overcome this absurd contradiction, Christ has instituted for the faithful the Sacrament of penance and reconciliation with God and with the Church.

Q: This is a question that is being extensively discussed with regard to the debate surrounding the post-synodal exhortation “Amoris Laetitia.”

A: “Amoris Laetitia” must clearly be interpreted in the light of the whole doctrine of the Church. [...] I don’t like it, it is not right that so many bishops are interpreting “Amoris Laetitia” according to their way of understanding the pope’s teaching. This does not keep to the line of Catholic doctrine. The magisterium of the pope is interpreted only by him or through the congregation for the doctrine of the faith. The pope interprets the bishops, it is not the bishops who interpret the pope, this would constitute an inversion of the structure of the Catholic Church. To all these who are talking too much, I urge them to study first the doctrine [of the councils] on the papacy and the episcopate. The bishop, as teacher of the Word, must himself be the first to be well-formed so as not to fall into the risk of the blind leading the blind. [...]

Q: The exhortation of Saint John Paul II, “Familiaris Consortio,” stipulates that divorced and remarried couples that cannot separate, in order to receive the sacraments must strive to live in continence. Is this requirement still valid?

A: Of course, it is not dispensable, because it is not only a positive law of John Paul II, but he expressed an essential element of Christian moral theology and the theology of the sacraments. The confusion on this point also concerns the failure to accept the encyclical “Veritatis Splendor,” with the clear doctrine of the “intrinsece malum.” [...] For us marriage is the expression of participation in the unity between Christ the bridegroom and the Church his bride. This is not, as some said during the Synod, a simple vague analogy. No! This is the substance of the sacrament, and no power in heaven or on earth, neither an angel, nor the pope, nor a council, nor a law of the bishops, has the faculty to change it.

Q: How can one resolve the chaos that is being generated on account of the different interpretations that are given of this passage of Amoris Laetitia?

A: I urge everyone to reflect, studying the doctrine of the Church first, starting from the Word of God in Sacred Scripture, which is very clear on marriage. I would also advise not entering into any casuistry that can easily generate misunderstandings, above all that according to which if love dies, then the marriage bond is dead. These are sophistries: the Word of God is very clear and the Church does not accept the secularization of marriage. The task of priests and bishops is not that of creating confusion, but of bringing clarity. One cannot refer only to little passages present in “Amoris Laetitia,” but it has to be read as a whole, with the purpose of making the Gospel of marriage and the family more attractive for persons. It is not “Amoris Laetitia” that has provoked a confused interpretation, but some confused interpretations of it. (I disagree, Amoris Laetitia is full of confusion and intentionally so and Berogoglio's comments at both and after the Synods affirms it. I suspect he is being political here so as not to contradict the Pope directly. - Vox) All of us must understand and accept the doctrine of Christ and of his Church, and at the same time be ready to help others to understand it and put it into practice even in difficult situations.

Here Bergoglio, here is your Luther!

Here Pope Bergoglio, here you can gaze upon the filth of your Luther.

We Are About To Enter A New World War, Christians Are Going To Suffer The Most Horrific Persecution, Humanity Is About To Enter Its Darkest Moment, A Great Cloud Of Evil Will Flood The Earth, And It Will Create An Ocean Of Blood And Death

By Theodore Shoebat

“I do insist,” Hitler once said, “on the certainty that sooner or later — once we hold power — Christianity will be overcome and the German church established. Yes, the German church, without a Pope and without the Bible, and Luther, if he could be with us, would give us his blessing.”

In these words, we see the ideological link between Luther’s revolution and Nazi thought. In the uprising of Germany, be it in the First World War or the Second World War, we see Luther at the heart of the ideological aspiration of imperialism, Darwinism, and the desire to exterminate and conquer one’s enemies. If Germany ever rises again as an enemy of humanity, Luther will be at the center its despotic reign of terror.

Caution: disturbing images 

http://shoebat.com/2017/01/27/we-are-about-to-enter-a-new-world-war-christians-are-going-to-suffer-the-most-horrific-persecution-humanity-is-about-to-enter-its-darkest-moment-a-great-cloud-of-evil-will-flood-the-earth-and-it-w/

Maltese Archbishop Scicluna throws Pope Bergoglio under the bus - says he is following Pope with his heresy and sacrilege

Maltese Archbishop Scicluna has thrown Pope Bergoglio under the bus. If this little bishop with small hands says he is following the Pope then he has just acknowledged that the Pope's document Amoris Laetitia is full of heresy and sacrilege. 

Cardinals and Bishops of the world. Where is your faith?

Do you not fear Christ?

BLOGS  |  JAN. 30, 2017

Archbishop Scicluna: We Are Following the Pope’s Directives

Maltese prelate defends controversial guidelines on ‘Amoris Laetitia’ in his first interview since they were released. Says in a homily that the faithful should direct questions on the document to Pope Francis.

Edward Pentin

Pope Francis’ comments to Argentine bishops last year on allowing Holy Communion for some civilly remarried divorcees was the blueprint for the Maltese bishops own controversial guidelines on interpreting Amoris Laetitia, Archbishop Charles Scicluna has said.

The archbishop of Malta made the remarks in his first full interview (see transcript below) since he and Bishop Mario Grech of Gozo published their guidelines on the apostolic exhortation on Jan. 13.

http://www.ncregister.com/blog/edward-pentin/archbishop-scicluna-we-are-following-the-popes-directives

Pope Bergoglio: "proselytism is a sin" and "solemn nonsense" Or is it?

In yet another interview, papal media sensation Jorge Bergoglio today told Christians to “go out” and to “bring the message of Jesus to others.” In more nonsensical blathering he said that the "best business we can do with many Christians, is to sell them mothballs so that they put them in their clothes and in their lives."

He has also told us in the past that “proselytism  is a sin” and again he has said that it is, “solemn nonsense.”

At the same time, he does not preach to Muslims to come to Christ, and he has allowed his curia to state that the Church’s mission to the Jews is over.

The only “solemn nonsense” is the distortion and confusion and Jesuitical pride coming from the mouth of the Bishop of Rome!

LOS ANGELES -- When asked in a new interview what specific mission he has for the laity, Pope Francis responded with a frequent appeal: to go outside of oneself and take risks in evangelizing, rather than staying stuffed up at home while the moths move in.

“Sometimes I think the best business we can do with many Christians, is to sell them mothballs so that they put them in their clothes and in their lives and aren’t eaten by moths,” the pope said in the interview, published Sunday.

The interviewer, journalist Noel Díaz, had questioned the pope about a comment he had made to him on a previous occasion to “tell the laity to come out of the caves.”

When asked about the comment and what mission he would give to the laity with that image in mind, Francis said that many times Christians “are locked up and they are going to get eaten by moths.”

“They have to go out, they have to go and bring the message of Jesus” to others, he said, explaining that the Good News is meant to be shared, not stored away.

“The message of Jesus is to give it; so just as I receive it from him through a brother or sister, the grace comes to me and I give it,” he said, stressing that Christians shouldn’t “can” the message, trying to conserve it in a jar, because “it’s not to save, it’s to give.”

 https://cruxnow.com/vatican/2017/01/31/pope-francis-laity-go-evangelize-buy-mothballs/

"For there is not any thing secret that shall not be made manifest, nor hidden, that shall not be known and come abroad." Unless you're Jorge Bergoglio!

As a Catholic, I know that every five years or so, my bishop meets the Pope. For as long as we can remember, the Church has always communicated to the faithful, that which was discussed in the open generally consisting of the Pope's address to the assembled bishops at the "ad limina" visit.

Not any more.

It seems that Porn producing German bishops didn't like what happened the last time - what was intended for Bergoglio to say, but which was not said.

What is the Pope saying behind closed doors to our bishops? This secrecy is not from the Holy Spirit, it is from Bergoglio's "god of surprises."

Do you understand how evil this is? 

A Vicar of Christ? An enemy, is more the case!

There will be a surprise coming soon for this Peronist. 

Sandro Magister reports on this disgraceful practice now in place.

Francis did not read this speech to the bishops, as it effectively cast a bad light on the alliance that he had struck with the progressive wing of the German Church.

But the speech, as always, become public as having been delivered by the pope. And in Germany it let loose an uproar, in which Cardinal Reinhard Marx, archbishop of Munich and leader of the innovators, made himself the plaintive spokesman with Francis, obtaining from him this explanation that Marx afterward related to others: “I didn’t write it, I hadn’t read it, don’t pay any attention to it.”

http://magister.blogautore.espresso.repubblica.it/2017/01/30/attention-danger-no-more-speeches-from-the-pope-on-the-%E2%80%9Cad-limina%E2%80%9D-visits/

Bergoglio versus Trump - Is the Donald more Catholic than the Pope?

Not disconnected from the article one below on the potential influence of George Soros and a clandestine operation of the Obama/Democratic alliance with the mafia-esque St. Gallen group to undermine Pope Benedict XVI, is the obvious disdain which the Peronist Pope has for the man of the people, Donald J. Trump.

This Peronist Pope, a man who embraced Fidel Castro, seeks to throw the real Catholics of China under the communist tank, has slandered the new American President since his, Bergoglio's. return from the Mexican vacation.

Antonio Socci writes brilliantly with, Why Bergoglio has been so affectionate with Chinese despots and Castro, but ferocious with Trump

http://rorate-caeli.blogspot.com/2017/01/socci-why-bergoglio-has-been-so.html#more 

Bergoglio's actions in the political arena are not of Christ. To even think it possible is blasphemy. 

He is guided by his "god of surprises."

Was there a Soros/Democratic party conspiracy to elect Bergoglio?

As you may be aware, (so much to comment on so this has been delayed), The Remnant has published an Open Letter requesting that President Donald J. Trump conduct an investigation on potential American involvement in the undermining of Pope Benedict XVI and the election of Jorge Bergoglio to the papacy.

While this would be considered a "conspiracy theory" and cause heads to pop amongst most Catholic commentators, the evidence is there that there was a conspiracy as far back as 2005. How hard would it be to link this all together given the desires of the globalists, lead by George Soros, to destroy the Catholic faith and what is left of Christian Europe to say nothing, of our grossly secular, North America. 

Now, the secular media has noticed.

http://www.thenewamerican.com/usnews/foreign-policy/item/25256-catholics-ask-trump-to-probe-soros-obama-clinton-conspiracy-at-vatican

A timely Office Hymn

Overnight, there was a terrorist attack at a mosque in Quebec resulting in the death of at least six people. The victims were all Muslims.

One man, a young Quebecois, has been arrested and charged.

May God, in his infinite mercy, grant peace to those who sincerely tried, in spite of the falsity of the corrupted belief system that they followed, to seek Him.

Of course, leftists in Canada and elsewhere are blaming the President of the United States, Donald J. Trump for the attack. One person, a Quebecois, has been arrested. His motives, at this point, are undetermined, but of course, he liked Donald Trump on Facebook.

We also hear the usual bleating from the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops, the very pretty Father Edward Beck, James Martin, Daniel Horan and the usual crows of Marxist Priests on who evil the President's actions are and how it is our Christian duty to bring every one of the world's suffering in to our lands.

Not true. They are Marxists and globalists, they are not Catholic.

And nobody has right to enter another country. People have a right to dwell in safety and security in their lands.

Today, in Lauds of the Divine Office we find the following hymn.

Tu natale solum protege, tu bonae

Da pacis requiem Christiadum plagis

Armorum strepitus, et fera praelia

In fines age Thracios.

Et regum socians agmina sub crucis

Vexillo, Solymas nexibus exime,

Vindexque innocui sanguinis hosticum

Robur funditus erue.

Tu nostrum columen, tu decus inclytum,

Nostrarum obsequium respice mentium;

Romae vota libens excipe, quae pio

Te ritu canit, et colit.

A nobis abigas lubrica gaudia

Tu, qui Martyribus dexter ades, Deus

Une et Trine: tuis da famulis jubar,

Quo clemens animos beas.

Amen.

Be thou the guardian of thy native land,

And to all Christian nations grant repose

From din of arms, and every hostile band—

From all our borders drive away our foes.

Bid Christian princes marshal all their force

Beneath the sacred standard of the Rood,

To avenge sweet Salem's sacrilegious loss,

And crush the Paynim red with guiltless blood.

On thee our hopes are built, as on a tower;

Receive the homage we now humbly pay,

The vows which Rome accomplishes this hour,

With pious rites, and canticles' sweet lay.

Keep far from us all dangerous delight,

O God, who comfortest thy Martyrs' pain;

One God in Persons Three, bestow thy light

Wherewith Thou makest strong thy Martyrs slain.

Amen.

You can sing it to the tune, "Woodlands," (Tell Out My Soul)

Oh, in case you are wondering what "Paynim" means, click here.

Can we all now just call out these filthy Romans for setting up whom we have always known is their real target?

Laudetur Jesus Christus!

Now that the once great Knights of Malta have folded like a bunch of effeminate bridge players can we now just admit what and who the real target of this sordid mess happens to be?

The Lord bless thee, and keep thee. 

The Lord shew his face to thee, and have mercy on thee. 

The Lord turn his countenance to thee, and give thee peace. 
Numbers 6:24-26

And it is this last element that is the most newsworthy in the statement released this evening by the Order. As Settimo Cielo had correctly reported, Pope Francis has in effect granted the Order the faculty of proceeding according to its constitutions concerning its interim regency - now assumed by the Grand Commander of the Order, Fra' Ludwig Hoffmann von Rumerstein - and the appointment of the new Grand Master. So the “pontifical delegate” will neither replace nor overlap the legitimate governance of the Order, as many had hoped or feared. Instead he will accompany it with the task of “spiritual” guide. A task, that is, very similar to the one that already belongs by statute to the cardinal patron.

The decapitation inflicted by Pope Francis on the Order of Malta is therefore twofold. Because what is falling is not only the head of Grand Master Festing, but also, de facto, that of cardinal patron Raymond Leo Burke. Meaning the ones who had brought about the removal of Boeselager in the certainty that they were thereby putting into practice the mandate entrusted to them by the pope, in a December 1 letter to Burke: to “promote the spiritual interests of the order and remove any affiliation with groups or practices that run contrary to the moral law.”

http://magister.blogautore.espresso.repubblica.it/2017/01/29/after-the-grand-master-another-head-is-about-to-fall-that-of-cardinal-burke/

Go ahead Bishop of Rome Bergoglio, you'll make him a white martyr and set yourself against the work of faith for all to see. But you and your leftist, globalist cabal of malefactors, sodomites and Marxists will paint this man to be the real problem. 

You will have set yourself against Christ, just like those who put Him on the cross.

Your end will come, it will come soon. it will be devastating and it will be complete.

Repent, all you who have sullied Holy Mother Church. Repent or be damned in His judgement. 

And you think it's a mess now? Wait until Bergoglio calls Vatican III -- are we about to live Fatima?

Clearly, the disclaimer I wrote, is controversial to some. I dared to not take Ann's position and to suggest that she is wrong, at least, to state her opinion publicly. Look, Francis is the Pope. Ann is wrong. If, in the fullness of time, there is proof that Benedict's renouncement of the papacy was not valid and the election therefore was null, then we can consider Francis an antipope. The problem with those who do not accept this, or with sedevacantists is a papal positivism that the Pope can do no wrong, therefore, if he does, he cannot be Pope. This is to ascribe to the Bishop of Rome something which he does not have, all power, something he is not, divine! It is possible to simply have a bad pope. The purpose of the disclaimer was to ensure that all understood that just because I link to her on the column and quoted her below, does not mean I endorse the same position. 

Clear now?

Since 2 + 2 = 4 and not 5, notwithstanding the Bergoglio minion, Spadaro; Bergoglio is therefore, Pope. 

Now, a few months ago, I can't find the link, Monday Vatican reported on the potential of a Third Vatican Council. It went no further, no blog picked up on it, nor did I wish to push it.

Now, Ann has.

http://www.barnhardt.biz/2017/01/28/answers-why-wont-any-cardinals-speak-up-against-bergoglio/

So let me connect some dots. Maybe it's because I'm clean having just come back from Confession an hour ago ...

This is Fatima coming to life right before us. 

1. Bergoglio will call a Council, it will be an evil Council because the intent will be to enshrine sacrilege, change doctrine, unite with protestantism and create ecumenical worship.
2. God, in His vengeance, will not tolerate it and will, in His permissive will, permit a massive terrorist attack to take place by Mohammedans.
3. St. Peter's Basilica, where most of the bishops and cardinals (not all, some will not attend because they know it will be a corrupt council) will be destroyed and most there will be killed, including the Pope Francis.
4. Then, a "Bishop in white" will emerge and crawl over their dead bodies and up to the high altar where he will then be killed. That "Bishop in white" (note the Fatima seers did not say the Pope, even though they presumed him to be), is Joseph Ratzinger
5. The few surviving Cardinals will flea to Portugal, to Fatima where the "dogma of faith" will be preserved.
6. They will elect the Holy Pope who will then, with the remaining bishops and cardinals of the world, Consecrate Russia to the Immaculate Heart of Mary. 
7. Russia will come to the literal physical aid of Europe, the Orthodox Church will reunite with eternal Rome under Peter and this Holy Pope will "restore all things in Christ."
8. And a period of peace will be granted to the world, until we mess it up again.
9. And then the end will come.

God help us.

We're going to ruin your party Frank!

What Mundy said.

Times ten!

https://mundabor.wordpress.com/2017/01/28/ruining-the-party/

Will a sexual abuse scandal end the papacy of Pope Bergoglio?

Bergoglio has surrounded himself with sodomite priests, Msgr Ricca as one example, and praised "transvestites" and embrace the sodomite partner of a sodomite friend whilst in Washington. There are other examples.

Bergoglio has spoken much of combatting abuse. Is this true, or is he a hypocrite and is it about to take him down? 

Is all the fuss over changing the Nervous Disordered liturgy again and the battle with the Knights of Malta a diversion of attention away from that which is brewing just below the surface?

Elizabeth Yore is an international child advocate attorney.  She is the former General Counsel at the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children and the former General Counsel at the Illinois Department of Children and Family Services. She is an expert in human trafficking prevention and international child abuse investigations.

 She has investigated several clergy sex abuse cases. She writes in The Remnant and below, at LifeSiteNews:

Six cases where the sexual abuse scandal touches Pope Francis

January 25, 2017 (LifeSiteNews) – Recent revelations concerning Pope Francis and negligence over sexual abuse of minors are calling into question his strong words condemning the cover-up of sexual abuse.

In March 2014, in an announcement that received massive publicity, Pope Francis promised a new, more improved Vatican response to the clerical abuse of minors. He reaffirmed that the Vatican would institute zero tolerance for pedophile priests. He announced the creation of a new papal commission on child protection made up of Cardinals, experts, and victims of clergy abuse. This past May, Pope Francis spoke of the scandal again by saying, "This is a tragedy, we must not tolerate the abuse of minors. We must defend minors. And we must severely punish the abusers." Yet, there appears to be a gulf between his words on reform and the reality.

https://www.lifesitenews.com/opinion/six-cases-where-the-sexual-abuse-scandal-touches-pope-francis

Pope Francis wears the Tiara!