The Don Bergoglio Mafia friends of the Ratzingoglian Papacy

Christopher Ferrara exposes Don Mario's mafia.

A must read.

http://remnantnewspaper.com/web/index.php/articles/item/2723-don-mario-s-moral-mafia

The Ratzingoglio Papacy II

Once, I rejoiced at the election of Joseph Ratzinger, but what he has done by renouncing the Papacy was wrong and unnecessary. Now, he is humiliated by the man that replaced him as his work is undone. I am not into the theory that he is being drugged and controlled. My post yesterday has offended some of my readers. I was harsh on him. That is the way it is. It does not mean I deny his papacy or the current one, only that it is time to stop pretending when the facts show differently.

Joseph Ratzinger was wrong. He had no business renouncing the papacy. Bergoglio would never have been elected Pope because he would have long been retired by now and Ratzinger would still be Pope. He did not have to travel to WYD or anywhere else. He abandoned his children. He could have stayed in the Vatican with a Legate undertaking the daily tasks and under the protection of the Swiss Guards. He could have taught and written and ordered what was to be done. Yes, it is that simple. His health is clearly fine, for an old man.  

Those who love him hold out hope that he will speak against what is happening. He will not. He will not speak against Amoris Laetitia, he will not speak against what will happen in October in Lund when Bergoglio goes to praise the heretic, Martin Luther.

I wondered, at one time, as a good reader in the combox expresses, if he had a supernatural experience, an apparition of Our Lady perhaps and if this is why he left. I had to have an explanation. How could he? How could he leave? It must have been the Holy Spirit - he must have had a revelation? No! I was deluding myself because I did not want to admit what Ratzinger was, a Modernist and a coward. A man who denied his cross. Just because one prays and then acts believing it to be God telling him "do this" does not make it so. It may be the other one, or it may simply be one's own desires that one has convinced oneself to do and then justifies that as "God's will." Well, it is certainly God's permissive will.

Yes, that is harsh, but that is reality.

Welcome to the Ratzingoglio Papacy - Because most Catholics are stupid enough to believe that two popes are "just fine!"

More information from Ratzinger's upcoming book is coming out. Excuse me if I find this incredulous. Were we not told that he already wrote his last book? Was he not to retire to an "emeritus" position never to be seen or heard from again? Now, he's trotted out to applaud like a trained seal the heretical bovine excrement that his successor pushes upon the Church. 

Two peas in a pod these two this Ratzinger and Bergoglio. Neither of them deserve the title, Pope and even less, "Holiness." There is nothing "holy" about these two malefactors!

John Allen at Crux is reporting that Bergoglio thinks the Catholic faithful are just fine with these "two popes." He fulfils the role of lapdog to these two clowns well. If Allen ever had any credibility he has lost it pandering to this "novelty" and doing the bidding of Ratzingoglio.

There cannot be two Popes. Bergoglio is a fraud and Ratzinger is a traitor!

A pox on both of them!

Francis says the people have spoken: ‘Two popes are just fine.

"The book carries an original preface by Pope Francis, which was published Wednesday ...
Francis goes on to say that the situation the Church finds itself in today of having two living popes, one in office and the other emeritus, is a “novelty.” He doesn’t add, perhaps because he didn’t need to, that it’s a novelty not everyone finds entirely satisfying.
From the beginning, there have been critics of the arrangement. Some argued that because there can be only one pope at a time, the right thing for Benedict to do would have been to renounce all insignia and titles associated with the office and return to being Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger.
Others feared that having a retired pope around would be divisive and destabilizing, as critics of the new pope would rally around the old one.
Certainly there has been a bit of that in some quarters, and there are still some writers and theologians to this day who question the validity of Benedict’s resignation and thus whether Francis is actually a legitimate pope. ...
There were howls of protest recently when Archbishop Georg Gänswein, Benedict’s long time aide, made the seemingly common-sense suggestion that the new situation implies an expanded Petrine ministry, with an active member and a contemplative one. Some appeared to see it almost as the prelude to a putsch, if not a schism.
Francis is obviously aware of that reaction, and in effect his preface to the new Benedict biography delivers his response.
“Since they love each other,” Francis says of having two popes, “it’s a beautiful novelty.”
“In a certain sense,” he says, “it expresses in a particularly clear way the continuity of the Petrine ministry, without interruption, like links in a single chain forged by love.”
Then, Francis comes to what he apparently sees as the popular bottom line.
“The holy people of God, on the path, have understood this very well,” he asserts.
In terms of how he knows what people think, here’s what he says: “Every time the emeritus pope has appeared in public, at my invitation, and I was able to embrace him in front of everyone, the joy and the applause of those present has been sincere and intense.”
Francis’ conviction seems to be that while theologians, ecclesiologists and bloggers may be perplexed or perturbed, the ordinary people of God aren’t. They love Benedict just as they love Francis, in part for who they are, but perhaps even more for what they represent. 

...

https://cruxnow.com/analysis/2016/08/27/francis-says-people-spoken-two-popes-just-fine/

More heretical nonsense from the mouth of this Bergoglio!

The entire commentary can be found at Zenit as translated by my good friend,.Thomas Rosica. 

https://zenit.org/articles/popes-conversation-with-jesuits-during-his-trip-to-poland/

After reading this, as I was alerted by a reader, I can only conclude the validity of my original words, -- that this is "Jesuitical arrogance" and "idiocy" and pure, unadulterated modernism where one can make purely orthodox statements about the devil and the supernatural and then plant within the poison of "grey" areas and how to "go beyond the law."

One drop of poison in a glass of water poisons the whole glass.

World Youth Day and the mind and mouth of Jorge Bergoglio; the gift that just keeps on giving whether we want it or not. We must really thank his Jesuit brother, Anthony Spadaro. Without this Jesuit's arrogance, we would not know of the idiocy coming from the mouth of this Bergoglio.

What curse is upon the Catholic faith that God has permitted the stupid men in red from giving us this man as Pope. For our sins and our sacrilege has led to the Church and Faith now being persecuted from within and from the very top, from a Bishop of Rome that is trapped in an era of error in critical thinking, in Catholic faith and formation and in theology.

This Bergoglio is truly a product of a corrupted Jesuitical formation which began, at least in the 1950's, and which has now come to fruition with one of its own in the Chair of Peter. What a destructive man this Pope is. At one time, many of us tried to give him the benefit of the doubt, He is feeble-minded, or suffering from some kind of dementia.

No!

He is of sound mind. A mind that is poisoned and has been poisoning others since that very day of his ordination and what he wishes to foist on the next generation of priests until the faith is dead!

"the seminarians, when they become priests, find themselves in difficulty in accompanying the life of so many young people and adults." ... "And many people leave the confessional disappointed. Not because the priest is bad, but because the priest doesn't have the ability to discern situations, to accompany them in authentic discernment," ... "They don't have the needed formation." ... "I repeat, you must teach this above all to priests, helping them in the light of the exercises in the dynamic of pastoral discernment, which respects the law but knows how to go beyond,"  "We need to truly understand this: in life not all is black on white or white on black," ... "The shades of grey prevail in life. We must them teach to discern in this gray area."

Poor babies are disappointed in that the priest did not tell them that they could go on watching pornography, masturbating, fornicating and engaging in sexual deviance with a person of the same-sex or that living with that other woman when their wife is left behind is adultery. Too bad the good priest could not see the grey and told the poor stupid youth that they will go to Hell!

It's all about sex!

O LORD, save your people. Save us from these malefactors in fine garments who have invaded your Church.

Benedict XVI resigned because of World Youth Day? Praises Raul Castro?

UPDATED:

This Tweet by Antonio Socci was made on June 28, 2016, shortly before the public celebration of his priestly ordination. My  thanks to two readers for this.

"There is currently, heavy pressure on Pope Benedict XVI and to obtain from him, an act of uncritical submission (acritica sottomissione) to Bergoglio. Let us pray for him."

If this is true and it is known about by any men of faith left in that wretched Vatican, then they are obligated to come to his aid and to make public this evil to the Catholic faithful. If they do not, then they will be held accountable before God for this dereliction.  

As for Joseph Ratzinger, yes; let us pray for him. Let us pray that he will find the courage and a way to speak to us, his children who love him, his children, whom he abandoned! 

In a stunning report at La Stampa, Andrea Tornielli is reporting on an interview with Pope Benedict XVI, the Emeritus.

The question we need to ask is this, "was this really Joseph Ratzinger." 

If it was, "was he drugged to say such idiocy? Was he threatened? What could he be threatened with?

Or rather, "is it someone from Francis' cabal creating, for them and their Peronist, some kind of cover?"

Or is it even more clear. "Joseph Ratzinger was not the Pope we believed him to be?"

Oakes Spalding asks, "What new deviltry" is this? Indeed!

“There were numerous commitments which I felt I was no longer able to carry through, notably, the World Youth Day which had been scheduled to take place in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, in the summer of 2013. I was very certain of two things. After the experience of the trip to Mexico and Cuba, I no longer felt able to embark on another very demanding visit. Furthermore, according to the format of these gatherings, which had been established by John Paul II, the Pope’s physical presence there was paramount. A television link or any other such technological solution was out of the question. This was another reason why I saw it as my duty to resign.”

“The visit to Mexico and Cuba had been a beautiful and moving experience for me in many ways. In Mexico I was struck by the profound faith of so many young people who communicated their joyous passion for God. I was equally struck by the great problems afflicting Mexican society and by the Church’s efforts to seek a faith-based response to the challenge posed by poverty and violence. I need scarcely remind you of how impressed I was in Cuba to see the way in which Raul Castro wishes to lead his country onto a new path, without breaking with the immediate past. Here too, I was deeply impressed by the way in which my brothers in the Episcopate are striving to navigate through this difficult process, with the faith as their starting point. However, during those visits I became acutely aware of the limits of my physical strength. Above all, I realised that I was no longer able to face future transoceanic trips due to jet lag. Naturally, I discussed these problems with my doctor, Professor Patrizio Polisca too. It thus became clear that I would not be able to take part in the World Youth Day in Rio de Janeiro in 2013, there was the obvious jet lag problem. From that moment on, I had a relatively short amount of time to decide on the date of my withdrawal.”

If this is true, then it is quite clear to this writer that Joseph Ratzinger is not worthy of the respect which this writer previously gave him.

For World Youth Day he resigned and not even for "Wales"? Praising a murderous villain such as an unrepentant Castro? This was said by Joseph Ratzinger?

Joseph Ratzinger was wrong. He did not need to resign and he never should have. He made a prudential error and the reasons do not matter. What matters is that he plunged the papacy into chaos and the Church into crisis.

He could have stayed. He did not need to go to Rio, or Krakow. He did not ever need to do another trip. Nothing compelled him to ever offer a Mass in St. Peter's Square. He was not obligated to do an Easter Triduum for thousands. He could have stayed for the rest of his life in his apartment and garden. He could have offered Mass daily in his chapel and on Sundays, delivered an Angelus from the window and a homily every Wednesday to the masses in an audience below. He could have appointed a Papal Legate or Vicar to do everything he wanted at pain of arrest by the Swiss Guards for disobedience. He could have sanctified himself and us, the sheep, by doing this and offering up his suffering as Karol Wojtyla did - an action which may have saved his soul from his papal errors.

"Pray for me that I do not flee for fear of the wolves," he said, Well, he abandoned his children to those same wolves he feared and a father does not abandon his children.

God is truly punishing us.

Yes, if you believe in women deacons, you are an apostate

As you probably have concluded, unlike Mark P. Shea, I don't generally fight with people in my combox. I post and you express your opinion. I don't argue with you for clickbait, which wouldn't matter because unlike those at Pathetic dot com and those such as Shea, Fisher, Schimek and others, I do not get paid for this. I have a real job.

What I will say is that if you are going to hit me, I am going to hit you back, in the manner of Donald J. Trump.


So, here it comes.

I have posted a few times on the matter of deaconettes/deaconesses. Let us be clear, there were no women deacons in any ordained ministry or liturgical role. Those who tell you otherwise are liars. Those who advocate for this are apostatising from the Catholic faith. This includes Phyllis Zagano and James Martin, S.J., and any other advocate no matter what colour of cassock they wear, if they were to even wear one.

Let us be clear. Any Catholic who believes that women can be ordained are apostates and do not believe that Our Lord Jesus Christ is God. It is that simple. Jesus is God incarnate. He was not bound by the culture of his time. If Jesus wanted to ordain women as priests he would have done so. He did not. Nor did he do this and the Holy Apostles and Evangelists covered it up. They did not go to their deaths for a lie, they went for the ultimate Truth. Had Jesus wanted women ordained as priests or deacons to fulfil a ministerial or liturgical role than the Apostles would have done it, recorded it, the Early Church would have adopted it and this post would not be written. Period. 

The matter is closed, John Paul II, a Pope declared a Saint by Francis affirmed this. Francis' re-opening of the debate can at best be described as, mischief.

All this being said, including the combox remarks. if someone, particularly "anonymous" wishes to argue with me or disrespect me, let me be clear. you do not get the last word. I do.

This is my blog. If you don't like it, then go read John 6 and do it. 

What I find most interesting though is that this blog and many, many others of better quality are really making people angry, making Satan angry. We are, in fact, succeeding. If we were not, then the tirade of comments that I have been receiving as of late, in these slow blog reader days of August, would not be happening. 

The discussion below is not from my Canonist but what I find interesting is that I suspect that it is from a priest. Why? This quote: "You want to obsess on Tridentine liturgy, go ahead. No one is listening." 

In discussion with a good friend, he has opined that some who are "obsess" about the "Tridentine liturgy" have what one might say is "all lace and no grace." It is entirely show. This person, if a priest as I suspect, is one of those who is all lace and no grace, though, I doubt that there is even any grace. One can be "obsessed" about Tridentine liturgy but not convicted as a Catholic, it is done without context. What this comment shows it that this person is that. Typically, in many dioceses, the chancery officials don't care if you celebrate a Latin EF Mass here and there, "it's all worship" as one Monsignor has said to me. But if that priest preaches on abortion, sodomy, adultery, proper reception of Holy Communion, or moves the tabernacle to the middle of the sanctuary, faces it or makes it possible for people to kneel, then watch out. As one priest known to me was recently told, "this is Canada, not Rome."

What these people are afraid of is that they see the future and realise that it is a collapse of everything they believe in. They don't believe in Christ, they don't believe in supernatural faith. They are modernists and syncretists and as far as Jesus goes, they are at best, Arians. 

We are winning friends, it may not look like it but we are and my friend below does not get the last word, I do.

Anonymous said...
Misogyny, even when shouted from the steeple of a church, is still misogyny.
1:33 pm, August 24, 2016
Vox Cantoris said...
It has nothing to do with misogyny and everything to do with ontology. Clearly, you don't get it.
2:30 pm, August 24, 2016
Anonymous said...
You can fishwrap it any way you want to disguise it, but it's all mansplaining - not christianity.
5:50 pm, August 24, 2016
Vox Cantoris said...
"Fishwrap?" You have the wrong place.
Now, you are entitled to your opinion, you are not entitled to your own facts.
5:59 pm, August 24, 2016
Anonymous said...
You want to obsess on Tridentine liturgy, go ahead. No one is listening.
But to state that Phyllis Zagano is an apostate relegates this blog to the status of fishwrap my friend.
They still have a few old school confessionals left in Canada I believe...
11:10 pm, August 24, 2016
Vox Cantoris said...
Sorry, my anonymous coward, as for your last, you do not get the last word on this blog!
See this morning's post.

I'm staying here, right with Cardinal Burke!

 

“Absolutely not, I will never leave the Catholic Church. No matter what happens I intend to die a Roman Catholic. I will never be part of a schism." 

“I’ll just keep the faith as I know it and respond in the best way possible. That’s what the Lord expects of me. But I can assure you this: You won’t find me as part of any schismatic movement or, God forbid, leading people to break away from the Catholic Church. As far as I’m concerned, it’s the church of our Lord Jesus Christ and the pope is his vicar on earth and I’m not going to be separated from that.”

That was Raymond Cardinal Burke.

I stand with Cardinal Burke.

And I'll continue to be their worst nightmare.

BREAKING: GEORGE SOROS AND OPEN SOCIETY PLOTTED INFLUENCE OVER POPE FRANCIS

George Soros' Open Society Foundation attempted to influence Pope Francis. 

The Remant has the story.

http://remnantnewspaper.com/web/index.php/articles/item/2714-the-pope-s-boss-wikileaks-pope-and-soros-an-unholy-alliance

National Catholic Register fires Simcha Fisher! Does herself in with her filthy mouth!

The Tenth Crusade has some screen shots of Fisher's meltdown over the parting of Mark Shea.  

A vulgar, grotesque, arrogant screed on social media seems to have helped.

She's now been sacked too!

Good. 

No, Monsignor Swetland, you are quite incorrect, and quite deluded, too!

The Church cannot demand that I, as a Catholic, must believe that Islam is a religion of peace. You cannot compel me to believe what history and current events show is untrue. 

Neither the good Monsignor nor Pope Bergoglio have any authority over me or any Catholic on this matter, it is simply their opinions, their personal judgements. 

Swetland's comments in this video are shocking in their ignorance. He is out of his depth with Spencer, to be sure.

Monsignor Swetland is duped by ideology. He is what the Islamists call a "dhimmi" or what Lenin called, a "useful idiot."

Swetland actually admits at the end of the debate, that, whilst at Oxford, he "thought of Islam as a religion to enter."

What will Our Lord say to him for distorting the truth, misdirecting Catholics and leaving poor Moslems in their darkness?

https://www.jihadwatch.org/2016/08/is-there-room-in-the-catholic-church-for-those-who-dont-believe-islam-is-a-religion-of-peace

http://www.crisismagazine.com/2016/must-catholics-believe-islam-peaceful

Catholic Member of Parliament Celine Cesare-Chavannes - An Enemy of Life and enemy of Christ

In June, I wrote about a Member of Canada's Parliament, Celine Cesare-Chavannes. At the time, the column was in reference to Chavannes overt support of the raising of the sodomic rainbow flag on Parliament Hill. She wrote me offline and I gave her the truth that she needed to hear, as a Catholic. Chavannes is a regular parishioner at Holy Family Church in Whitby in the eastern part of the Archdiocese of  Toronto.

Clearly, Chavannes is a woman who does not know her faith. Worse, she is a hostile and aggressive enemy of Christ and of Truth. 

It wasn't enough that this bad-Catholic was supporting the homosexualist agenda, now, she is leading the campaign against the quite proper use of graphic imagery as part of the fight against the murder of unborn children, something this Catholic supports - a use, I should add, that has been upheld by the courts. 

In order to remind Chavannes what the truth is she is trying to hide, she might meditate on this, something that she would rather hide than to actually end the killing!

Not only does Justin Trudeau support abortion until the moment of birth, but he demanded that Catholic, Celine Cesare-Chavannes and all other candidates, must support a women's right to choose to murder her child and the right of doctors to make a fortune on it. She also supported the recent euthanasia legislation.

Perhaps Father Laszlo Nagy the Pastor or his Associate Father Marijan Sisko might have a few words to say to Mrs. Cesare-Chavannes, the next time she presents herself for Holy Communion. 

It might save her soul, and others who profane the Holy Eucharist and "eat unto their own condemnation," to say nothing about those clerics who ignore this to their own peril.

Rainer Maria Cardinal Woelki - if he can betray his role as custodian of this Cathedral, he can betray the true Shepherd and the sheep of his pasture!

More rot from Germany. 

"They have set up their signs for ensigns"

It could only be an evil man that would allow the desecration of the Temple of  God in such a manner. 

What kind of bishop would allow this to happen in his Cathedral? 

What kind of man with faith in God would permit such an abomination?

"They have set fire to thy sanctuary."

"They have defiled the dwelling place of thy name on the earth."

Rainer Maria Cardinal Woelki. A disgusting curse upon the Church in Germany. A despicable prelate who cares not about the One, True, Faith. A syncretist and Masonic stooge. A traitor of Our Lord Jesus Christ. An effeminate, a Judas.

If he cares so little about the integrity of his Cathedral, what does he care about the sheep of his flock?

What kind of man is this?

Or is he even, a man.

NovusOrdoWatch, (Nota bene: sedevacantist) has all the details and videos.

Ut quid, Deus. A prayer of the church under grievous persecutions.

1. Understanding for Asaph. O God, why hast thou cast us off unto the end: why is thy wrath enkindled against the sheep of thy pasture? 
2. Remember thy congregation, which thou hast possessed from the beginning. The sceptre of thy inheritance which thou hast redeemed: mount Sion in which thou hast dwelt. 
3. Lift up thy hands against their pride unto the end; see what things the enemy hath done wickedly in the sanctuary. 
4. And they that hate thee have made their boasts, in the midst of thy solemnity. They have set up their ensigns for signs,
5. And they knew not both in the going out and on the highest top. As with axes in a wood of trees,
6. They have cut down at once the gates thereof, with axe and hatchet they have brought it down. 
7. They have set fire to thy sanctuary: they have defiled the dwelling place of thy name on the earth. 
8. They said in their heart, the whole kindred of them together: Let us abolish all the festival days of God from the land. 
9. Our signs we have not seen, there is now no prophet: and he will know us no more. 
10. How long, O God, shall the enemy reproach: is the adversary to provoke thy name for ever?
11. Why dost thou turn away thy hand: and thy right hand out of the midst of thy bosom for ever? 
12. But God is our king before ages: he hath wrought salvation in the midst of the earth.
13. Thou by thy strength didst make the sea firm: thou didst crush the heads of the dragons in the waters. 
14. Thou hast broken the heads of the dragon: thou hast given him to be meat for the people of the Ethiopians. 
15. Thou hast broken up the fountains and the torrents: thou hast dried up the Ethan rivers.
16. Thine is the day, and thine is the night: thou hast made the morning light and the sun.
17. Thou hast made all the borders of the earth: the summer and the spring were formed by thee.
18. Remember this, the enemy hath reproached the Lord: and a foolish people hath provoked thy name. 
19. Deliver not up to beasts the souls that confess to thee: and forget not to the end the souls of thy poor. 
20. Have regard to thy covenant: for they that are the obscure of the earth have been filled with dwellings of iniquity.
21. Let not the humble be turned away with confusion: the poor and needy shall praise thy name. 
22. Arise, O God, judge thy own cause: remember thy reproaches with which the foolish man hath reproached thee all the day. 
23. Forget not the voices of thy enemies: the pride of them that hate thee ascendeth continually.

Bye-bye, Mark!

No, not that Mark.

This Mark!

Mark P. Shea WAS A NOT SO popular NEO-Catholic writer and speaker. The author of numerous books, his most recent work is The Work of Mercy (Servant) and The Heart of Catholic Prayer (Our Sunday Visitor). Mark contributes numerous articles to many magazines, including his popular column “Connecting the Dots” for the National Catholic Register. NOT ANYMORE! Mark is known nationally for his one minute “Words of Encouragement” on Catholic radio. He also maintains the Catholic and Enjoying It blog. He lives in Washington state with his wife, Janet, and their four sons.

It seems that the National Catholic Register has finally had enough of him and the LifeSiteNews story may have been the final straw. 

There is a greater matter here. What is going on at National Catholic Register that would allow these writers to write unedited blog posts? The same thing happened a few weeks ago with John Paul Schimek. The Register has a serious problem that it needs to address.

While it would be wrong to rejoice in somebody's misfortune, having been directly on the receiving end of his hypocrisy, rage and false-mercy, it reminds me of the old phrase, "what comes around, goes around." 

Schimek - gone.

Shea - gone.

What neo-Cath will be next?

The delusional papacy

"The Church is not falling to pieces. It has never been better. This is a wonderful moment for the Church, you just need to look at its history. 

Meeting with the priests of the Diocese of Rome in Saint John Lateran, September 16, 2013

And things have gotten just so much better since he uttered this delusion.

Full Definition of delusion

1. the act of deluding :  the state of being deluded
2. something that is falsely or delusively believed or propagated
3. a persistent false psychotic belief regarding the self or persons or objects outside the self that is maintained despite indisputable evidence to the contrary; 
4. the abnormal state marked by such beliefs

Denzinger-Bergoglio does it so well.

The blood of Syria is on the hands of many and Hussein Obama and Hillary Clinton are at the top of the list!

Some of you may know that the blood running through my veins is entirely Lebanese. My grandparents were born in that beautiful land. On their immigration papers to Canada, it is noted that they were from, Greater Syria. Lebanon and Syria were not independent countries. 

The Lebanese were an identifiable ethnic group descended from Phoenicians and Canaanites They spoke the same language of Our Lord Jesus - Aramaic, as did their cousins in Syria, until they were Arabised by the Mohammedan hordes 1300 years ago. 

Notwithstanding that, the Christians and Muslims of Lebanon and Syria, for the most part, got along. 

The blood on this poor little boy is the fault of many, not the least of which is Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton, John McCain and many others in the United States. This boy, may have been injured by Russian bombs, made necessary because America funded insurgents against the legitimate government of Syria under Bashar Assad. Interestingly, Russia is the only foreign power operating legally in Syria.

Yes, Donald Trump is correct. America, through Obama, Clinton and others created ISIS by funding rebels which undermined the legitimate government of Syria. 

We, in the West, are responsible for this outrage. Bashar Assad is a civilised man. He is the legitimate head of the Syrian Government. It is not up to us to depose him. If we depose him, why not Robert Mugabe in Zimbabwe? Why not the tinpot madman in North Korea? America has destroyed this country and both parties are responsible. John McCain demanded even more invasion. Obama, instead, funded insurgents, most of whom became ISIS.
What threat did Syria pose to Europe or North America? What threat did they even pose to Israel? The picture is of President Assad and his wife at Christmas Mass in Damascus. Can you imagine what Syria would be under the rebels supported by Obama. Would this most ancient Christian population even survive? No, they would go the way of Christians in Babylon, Ninevah and Chaldea after Saddam was assassinated, another, who was no threat to America or Europe.

Will Sykes-Picot ever end?

Many will be held accountable before God for what has happened to this beautiful land and these people; my cousins. Obama and Clinton will be at the head of the line, Sykes and Picot have already been judged.