Francis, Bishop of Rome! Your power and authority is very, very limited. Be very careful about what you attempt to do!

Sermon for the 11th Sunday After Pentecost, 2016: Tradition is not Magic, the power of the Pope is very limited

by Fr. Richard G. Cipolla

Parish of Saint Mary

Norwalk, Connecticut

Brethren, I make known unto you the Gospel which I preached to you, which also you have received and wherein you stand, by which also you are saved, if you hold fast after what manner I preached unto you, unless you have believed in vain. For I delivered unto you first of all, which I also received. (I Cor. 15: 1-2)

To receive and to pass on. That is the essence of what the Catholic Church means by Tradition with a capital T. We are not a people of the Book, like Islam, the basis of which faith is entirely the Koran. And there are Protestant Christians who are also people of the Book, but their book is the Bible. And for them the whole faith is contained in the Bible and the purpose of study is to constantly read and examine and analyze the text of the Bible. That this foundation is shaky should be obvious: for the original languages of the Bible are Hebrew and Greek, and therefore every translation is subject to that fundamental dictum that translation always involves in a sense a betrayal, for every translation bears the marks and prejudices of particular people and of a particular culture. There is no total objectivity in translation and in a faith like Christianity that insists that the ultimate truth is found in the person of Jesus Christ whose words are recorded in the gospels this problem is acute. But we Catholics have always believed from the very beginning that what has been handed down, the Tradition, is not merely what is recorded faithfully in the Bible, especially in the New Testament, but also includes the oral tradition handed down from Jesus to the Apostles and to the Church.

http://rorate-caeli.blogspot.com/2016/07/sermon-for-11th-sunday-after-pentecost.html#more

Open Letter to Confused Catholics

http://www.sspxasia.com/Documents/Archbishop-Lefebvre/OpenLetterToConfusedCatholics/

In Poland, Jorge Bergoglio affirms his intent to undermine the very nature of the Catholic Church!

There can be no denying that Jorge Bergoglio's hints at the Synod and in Amoris Laetitia will now come to pass, at least, so long as he is alive and in the Chair of Peter.

Catholics, get your heads out of the sand! This is the most dangerous threat to the Catholic Church since Arius.

Cardinals and Bishops, will you stand by and allow this? 

You will go to Hell.

So will Bergoglio!

https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/pope-spoke-of-decentralizing-decisions-on-communion-for-divorced-remarried

Pope spoke of ‘decentralizing’ decisions on Communion for divorced/remarried: Polish bishops’ head

 Amoris Laetitia , Catholic , Communion For Remarried , Pope Francis , Stanisław Gądecki ,World Youth Day

KRAKOW, Poland, July 29, 2016 (LifeSiteNews) – The head of the Polish bishops conference says that in a private meeting this week Pope Francis held with the country’s bishops, he spoke of allowing local bishops conferences to make decisions about the controversial practice of giving Communion to those who are divorced and remarried.

“The Holy Father says that general laws are very hard to enforce in each country, and so he speaks about decentralization,” Archbishop Stanislaw Gadecki told reporters after a July 27 closed-door meeting with the Pope in Krakow. The pope had traveled to Poland for World Youth Day. 

The pope related that in a decentralized Church, bishops’ conferences “might on their own initiative not only interpret papal encyclicals, but also looking at their own cultural situation, might approach some specific issues in an appropriate manner,” Gadecki said.

https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/pope-spoke-of-decentralizing-decisions-on-communion-for-divorced-remarried

"How can you not understand that the world is being pulled in an irreversible direction? ... I don't know how to get through to you anymore!"

The Democrats, in convention, have done a lot of mocking of Donald Trump and the potential for a "bromance" with Vladimir Putin. Listening to them one after another is like listening to the drumbeats of war.

Russia is a civilised land of Christian people still trying to rid themselves of the Soviet poison. They are a cultured people. They have given the world some of its greatest architecture, as in St. Petersburg and great poets, composers and authors, philosophers and scientists. They are no longer Marxist, but we have become cultural Marxists.

They try to reverse the scourge of abortion initiated by Lenin, we triple-down on it.

They hold the wall against the insanity of so-called marriage of the same sexes and the homosexualist juggernaut and we embrace it.

The Consecration of Russia to the Immaculate Heart of Mary has not taken place. Either Sister Lucy was right or she was deluded. If she was deluded then there should be no commemoration of the events of Fatima and Our Lady. There was a "secret." The Church admits it, therefore, she was not deluded. The Popes have disobeyed at their, and our peril.

Our Lady asked for the Consecration of Russia and that through it, Russia would be converted, and the world would be granted a period of peace. If not, then its "errors" would spread throughout the world. 

It is too late, that Russia exists no more, and Russia's errors, the errors of its Soviet past, have spread, they have infected us in the West in terms of cultural Marxism. It is too late. It is done and we are being annihilated with no doubt, literal annihilation to come.

But, what would the Consecration bring about, if done now, after Russia's errors have already spread?

In my view, it would bring a near instant reconciliation between East and West and invigorate the Church. It would lead to a bursting forth of heaven sent grace. It would push back the Islamic hordes and it would be bold enough to convert them, finally, to Our Lord Jesus Christ and His Church. It would be seen as a miracle from God alone that would bring all Christians home to a Catholic Church renewed to evangelise the world. It would be Holy Mother Russia which would rescue the Europe and the West through its rejuvenated Christianity united under Rome.

That is how, in my view, our merciful Lord will use our dereliction and insult to His Holy Mother. But it won't come without a price that we are still yet to pay because of our lack of faith and the disobedience of popes, cardinals, bishops, priests and Catholic faithful.

Russia is not my enemy. Russia is not Canada's enemy. Russia is not Europe's enemy. Russia is not America's enemy. We have a common enemy, we know what it is, and we have a common bond. 

Are we insane? Missiles on our part - NATO, in Romania is to them what Russian missiles in Cuba were to the United States of America.

Vladimir Putin is probably the smartest world leader alive today. 

Russia is not our enemy!

Fathers, are you ready to defend your faithful. Faithful, are you ready to defend your priests?

All is joyful and celebratory in Poland. The Bishop of Rome advised the youth gathered there to "make chaos all night," similar to his idiotic statement at Rio, to "go make a mess." 

Pope Bergoglio knows something about making a mess, but where is the outrage for the great crime this week against Christ from His Vicar? 

Joy, joy, joy. It's all joy. All is well. Move along. Nothing to see here.

All is joyful and celebratory and a few days ago, a Catholic priest had his head cut off in an clear case of "odium fidei," instead of singing Veni Creator Spiritus, they sing the Marseillaise, sung as French Catholics were "beheaded" at the guillotine. Do we need to post the picture to make you angry enough?

Sorry, Jimmy Akin, Father IS a Martyr! Shall we give you all the reasons? What a pathetic writer.

Below this post is one from Fr.George Rutler on our duty in the face of terror. Read  him instead of Akin. 

I pick up, here, on a few of his themes.

It is the duty of a father to protect his family. He must protect his wife and his children. He must have locks on his doors (and walls on his country's borders, if necessary). He must be prepared to do battle, to injure and even to kill, if that is what is necessary to protect his wife and children from burglars or molesters or rapists or thieves or murderers. 

The commandment in the Decalogue is to not commit, willful murder." Killing another human, is often necessary, justified, and entirely the right thing to do. 

Our spiritual Fathers, priests, bishops and the Pope must also protect their spiritual children. They have, on the most part, failed to protect us as their spiritual children and; if they do not repent and change their ways, they will go to Hell for it and that includes a Pope!

Many of them are sodomites who have buggered our boys or perverts who raped our girls. 

Many of them spouted heresy. Many of them don't believe the truth of the Faith and don't believe in Transubstantiation; many are Arians, Masons, Deists and Syncretists. 

Notice, I wrote "many" not "the great majority" as our Bishop of Rome said about Catholic marriages.

The "great majority" are like Holy Martyr Jacques Hamel, labouring for love of Christ and His Church, even into retirement. 

They are good men, good priests, not all are "traditionalist," as that was not their formation, but they are good men who love Our Lord and do his work and are faithful to their vows and promises.

For them, and for you.

Father, are you ready? 

Have you thought about what happened in Rouen to Holy Jacques Hamel and the people there?

Islam is an evil death cult. There are good Muslims, in spite of this. But there are enough evil ones in our midst, in your midst. Yes, in your city and right here in mine, Toronto. 

Remember my friends in Toronto - the 17, remember the attempted attack a few months ago on a federal building in north Toronto by an Islamist from Somalia. Remember Ottawa.

The goal of radical Islam (and those who are using it to their Marxist advantage) is to destroy the Church and family. They hate Our Blessed Lord. They hate you and they hate me. They want Christ wiped out, They want the Church gone.

Our leaders are powerless to stop it because they do not understand it or they are part of the system. Hillary Clinton herself has said that religions need to change their views on abortion. In Canada, our malefactor and Dear Leader, a Catholic, hates the Faith, as proven by his actions before and since his election. They are part of an antichrist movement that will not protect you. They wish to devour your soul.

Begin to plan to protect and defend

Now what about your parish?


Fathers, have you thought about this? 

Are there cameras? Do you have men in the front pews - real men who are prepared to rise up and use force, if necessary. 

People, if someone shouts out the death call, "have a snackbar" a call that some bury their head in the sand over, are you prepared to respond and defend your priest? 

Will you run towards the evil as the Police in Dallas did, or will you run away and let your priest be butchered at the Altar?

Fathers, are you trained in firearms? Are you licenced? Do you own one or more? What the heck are you waiting for? 

All of us have a duty to protect one another. Turning the other cheek was an individual instruction, not a call for a community or nation to submit to massacre.

Seriously Fathers. Get ready!

It was Rouen, in Normandy. A weekday morning.

Where will it be next?

http://www.goodshepherdsecurityconsulting.com

A Christian Duty in the Face of Terror

As priest is slaughtered by ISIS at the altar, the West must wake up

by Fr. George Rutler | Updated 26 Jul 2016 at 5:54 PM

After another devastating ISIS attack in France, this time against a priest in his 80s while he was saying Mass, the answer isn’t just, “Do nothing.” As racism distorts race and sexism corrupts sex — so does pacifism affront peace.

Turning the other cheek is the counsel Christ gave in the instance of an individual when morally insulted: Humility conquers pride. It has nothing to do with self-defense.

Christ warned the apostles, as shepherds, to beware of wolves.

The Catholic Church has always maintained that the defiance of an evil force is not only a right but an obligation. Its Catechism (cf. #2265) cites St. Thomas Aquinas: “Legitimate defense can be not only a right but a grave duty for someone responsible for another’s life, the common good of the family or of the State.”

A father is culpable if he does not protect his family. A bishop has the same duty as a spiritual father of his sons and daughters in the church, just as the civil state has as its first responsibility the maintenance of the “tranquility of order” through self-defense.

Christ warned the apostles, as shepherds, to beware of wolves. This requires both the “shrewdness of serpents and the innocence of doves.” To shrink from the moral duty to protect peace by not using force when needed is to be innocent as a serpent and shrewd as a dove.

That is not innocence — it is naiveté.

Saint John Capistrano led an army against the Moors in 1456 to protect Belgrade. In 1601, Saint Lawrence of Brindisi did the same in defense of Hungary. As Franciscans, they carried no sword and charged on horseback into battle carrying a crucifix. They inspired the shrewd generals and soldiers, whom they had assembled through artful diplomacy, with their brave innocence.

Related: ISIS Executes Priest in France

This is not obscure trivia: Were it not for Charles Martel at Tours in 732 and Jan Sobieski at the gates of Vienna in 1683 — and most certainly had Pope Saint Pius V not enlisted Andrea Doria and Don Juan at Lepanto in 1571 — we would not be here now. No Western nations as we know them — no universities, no modern science, no human rights — would exist.

In the ninth century, the long line of martyrs of Cordoba told the Spanish Umayyad Caliph Abd Ar-Rahman II that his denial of Christ was infernal, and that they would rather die than surrender. Saint Juan de Ribera (d. 1611) and St. Alphonsus Liguori (d. 1787) repeated the admonition that the concept of peace in Islam requires not co-existence but submission.

The dormancy of Islam until recent times, however, has obscured the threat that this poses — especially to a Western civilization that has grown flaccid in virtue and ignorant of its own moral foundations.

Related: Islamic Reverence Syndrome

The shortcut to handling the crisis is to deny that it exists.

On the first day of the Democratic National Convention in Philadelphia, there were over 60 speeches, and yet not one of them mentioned ISIS.

Vice has destroyed countless individual souls, but in the decline of civilizations, weakness has done more harm than vice. “Peace for our time” is as empty now as it was when Chamberlain went to Munich and honor was bartered in Vichy.

Hilaire Belloc, who knew Normandy and all of Europe well, said in 1929: “We shall almost certainly have to reckon with Islam in the near future. Perhaps, if we lose our faith, it will rise. For after this subjugation of the Islamic culture by the nominally Christian had already been achieved, the political conquerors of that culture began to notice two disquieting features about it. The first was that its spiritual foundation proved immovable; the second, that its area of occupation did not recede, but on the contrary slowly expanded.”

The priest in Saint-Étienne-du-Rouvrary in Normandy, France, was not the first to die at the altar — and he will not be the last.

In his old age, the priest embodied a civilization that has been betrayed by a generation whose hymn was John Lennon’s “Imagine” — that there was neither heaven nor hell but “above us only sky” and “all the people living for today.” When reality intrudes, they can only leave teddy bears and balloons at the site of a carnage they call “inexplicable.”

Fr. George William Rutler is a Catholic priest and the pastor of the Church of St. Michael in Manhattan. 

Who are the real dissenters?

I find it interesting.

When I was a young lad, the dissenters in the Church were all the rage. It was so bad, I eventually left. I never really lost my faith, but the Church was enough of a mess that I lost interest. I was typical of someone growing up in the 1960's.

After a rather hedonistic period of life, I returned to the Church and to the Faith as it was taught to me by my parents and the good priests of my parish. It was a long road of return, including a long period of time in the cafeteria line. I had forgotten about the traditional Mass but came back to it and then became convicted by it for what I had become.

I practice the Faith today as my parents did, and as we did together, as a family.

Today, I am a dissenter.

If I have not changed, and I am the dissenter, what does it say about them?

Appeal to Cardinals Text and Signatories revealed - Press Release from group spokesman

As you may have read, someone has released the Appeal to Cardinals and the signatories.The report was sent to every Cardinal in the world as it was an appeal to them. It was not intended as a public document.

Catholics owe a debt of gratitude to and prayers for Dr. Shaw and the other signatories who have the faith, intellectual rigour, true charity, and clarity of thought to state the dangers of Amoris Laetitia.

With the permission of Joseph Shaw, one of the groups signatories and spokesman. I print the following.

Dear all,

In light of the appearance of the signatories and the text of the Appeal to the Cardinals online, the organisers of the appeal are issuing a press release, below.

The appeal and its covering letter can conveniently be seen here:

http://www.onepeterfive.com/theological-censures-amoris-laetitia-revealed/

I will be continuing to act as spokesman for the group, and will be happy to answer questions.

Dr Joseph Shaw

appealtothecardinals@gmail.com

The ‘National Catholic Reporter’ of Kansas City, Missouri, recently published, without authorisation, the names of the signatories of a letter to the College of Cardinals and Eastern Patriarchs; equally without authorisation, The Australian, an Australia-based newspaper, has recently published the full text of the letter and the accompanying document. The latter is a theological critique of the apostolic exhortation Amoris laetitia, and requested that the cardinals and patriarchs petition Pope Francis to definitively and finally condemn certain propositions. In order to protect the signatories and the critique from misrepresentation, the organisers of these documents wish to offer some further comment and explanation of them.

As explained in previous statements, the organisers did not make these documents public, since they are addressed to the Cardinals and Patriarchs, who would ideally have been allowed to consider them without the distraction of public controversy over the documents.

The critique is the work of a number of Catholic scholars who were concerned that Catholics might understand some passages of Amoris laetitia as contradicting the doctrine of the Catholic faith.

The remedy for this danger is an authoritative and final statement by the Supreme Pontiff stating that these understandings cannot be held by Catholics, and that Amoris laetitia does not present them as magisterial teachings or require that they be believed. The college of cardinals has the function of advising the Pope. The patriarchs of the Eastern Catholic churches also have the right and responsibility to advise the Supreme Pontiff on this matter in virtue of the importance of their office. Accordingly a document was drafted setting forth the gravest dangers of the text of Amoris laetitia and sent to the cardinals and patriarchs, along with a letter requesting them to petition the Pope to condemn the errors at issue.

The dangers to the faith found in passages of Amoris laetitia, in light of the ways they can be understood, are indicated by the application of theological censures. Theological censures are terms that identify the precise character of a threat to faith and morals that is found in an assertion. The various censures used in the document refer either to the gravity of the error found in a statement, or to the harmful effects that are liable to result from it. The censures in the critique are purely doctrinal and not juridical in nature, as the signatories do not claim or possess the authority necessary to impose juridical censures. They do not question the personal faith of Pope Francis or claim that he assents to the propositions censured. This is shown by the purpose of the document, which is to obtain a condemnation of these propositions by the Pope.
The censures are intended to advise the cardinals and patriarchs, and their authority comes from the Scriptural and magisterial texts that are cited to justify them. Censures of this kind may be assigned by any person in the Church who has the knowledge, role, and mission needed to teach concerning questions of faith and morals.

The censures and the references given to justify them are based on the Catholic understanding of faith and divine revelation.

According to this understanding, if a statement is proposed by the Church as requiring the assent of faith (the most authoritative level of teaching), that statement is not a human interpretation of a divine act or teaching, but is a statement made by God Himself. Such statements are formulated using languages and concepts belonging to human cultures, and are taught by the Church in particular historical circumstances. But these languages, concepts, and circumstances do not in any way alter or distort the truths that God asserts. They are used by all-powerful divine providence to express precisely the meaning that God intends to communicate. It is the signatories’ earnest hope and prayer that the cardinals and patriarchs will speak out against the errors that their critique addresses, and that the Holy Father will authoritatively condemn these errors.

ENDS

Look what Bergoglio's Pontifical Council has in store for the yutes in Poland and beyond

Who will call out this malefactor in white? 

Anyone other than a few bloggers?

How does a Pope preside over the corruption of our yutes?

Maybe someone is trying to get your attention!

https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/vatican-releases-explicit-sex-ed-for-teens-that-leaves-aside-parents-and-mo

https://www.lifesitenews.com/media/whats-in-the-vaticans-sex-ed

At World Youth Day, Vatican releases teen sex-ed program that leaves out parents and mortal sin

 Amoris Laetitia , Pontifical Council For The Family , Pope Francis , Sex Education , Vatican ,World Youth Day

Update: The Vatican's full program has been published at the website run by the Pontifical Council for the Family here, however some have been experiencing difficulties accessing the site.

Editor’s Note: A slide show of problematic content in the Vatican sex ed program is available here. (Caution: Sexually explicit images.)

According to Vatican Communications Office Spokesman, Thomas J. Rosica, CSB; "Allahu akbar" was never a call to violence and destruction"

I think we might find a few people who might disagree with our Basilian friend.

http://www.thereligionofpeace.com/attacks/attacks.aspx?Yr=Last30

http://torontocatholicwitness.blogspot.ca/2016/07/islamist-killer-of-french-priest.html

Bergoglio says that "all religions want peace"

"Jorge Mario Bergoglio is the greatest threat to the Catholic Church of any man alive. If I (or anyone else) cannot speak out on that, Catholicism is not much more than a Dear Leader cult. Obviously, I do not agree that it is." Oakes Spalding

With the decapitated body of Father Jacques Hamel barely cold; with no funeral rites yet taken, Francis, Bishop of Rome, has told journalists on the aeroplane to Poland that, "every religion wants peace."

This Pope is either deluded or imbued with syncretistic modernism. If one believes that Islam is a true religion and that Mohammed was a true prophet then one must be an Arian, the very roots of this cult. It is to deny Jesus Christ and Him crucified and resurrected.

He might wish to study some of the record.

Islam has never wanted peace. Perhaps some of the 1.6 billion Mohammedans do, but not the political ideology that is Islam. There are good Muslims, yes. But it is in spite of Islam not because of it. It is a belief system devoid of grace and truth.

Here is just what has happened in this Religion of Peace, over the last 30 days.

Saying that the world is at, "a real war, not a religious war," the Bishop of Rome blamed the current war as being one of "interests, a war for money, a war for natural resources and the dominion of peoples."

The fundamental premise of the Mohammedan death cult known as Islam is world dominion and subjugation of all peoples to this religion of an antichrist. 

Perhaps this, is the "dominion" that Francis is talking about?

He continued in his erudite rambling to add, that the "world is at war, because it's lost its peace." That is like saying, "I have no money because I've lost my wallet!"

His ignorance of the historicity of hatred of Christ and Christians from Islam is profound and dangerous. His ignorance of that written about Islam by the Saints is beyond belief.

How many must die in slaughter for Jorge Bergoglio, and the rest of our effeminate leaders, to call out this monstrous death-cult? Paris was not enough. Brussels wasn't. Not Nice, either. Not Orlando. Not New York on 9-11. Not the tens of thousands of Christian and innocent Muslims in Iraq, Syria, Afghanistan, Pakistan (by the way, how is Asia Bibi?). Not the Africans, there is no care for the slaughter there.

Nowhere does he say what must be said.

Nowhere does he call Europe back to its Catholic faith, the only way she will be saved in this world and the next.

Nowhere does he call on these radical Mohammedans to come to Our Lord Jesus Christ and be saved rather than die and spend eternity in Hell. Nowhere does he call sincere and gently Muslim people to come to He whom alone can save them.

If this is Christ's Vicar, I shudder to imagine the False Prophet!

The Popes have been wrong and so was the Council

Originally published on February 15, 2015

Has the Church's pastoral advice since Vatican II been wrong on Islam? That is a provocative question for a faithful Catholic to ask.  

All revelation ended with the death of the last apostle, Saint John the Evangelist. To say otherwise is heresy. Muslims believe the Gospels were corrupted and that Jesus was a Muslim, himself.

We can't both be right. 

There is no convergence, there is certainly no "Chrislam," as some deceived "Christians" and one-world religion globalists would like to see. This is not only heresy, but real and true blasphemy.

The Second Vatican Council and the Popes since, have confused the faithful in the message that they have sent in the desire for what is dialogue and a false oecumenism. They have allowed millions of souls to perish into Hell -- souls of our Muslim brothers and sisters lost forever to the father of lies who spawned their founder. He was no prophet but a scheming, lecherous, murderous, thief, rapist and child-molester. 

Our last three popes have prayed in a mosque or invited prayer with their religious leaders. The current Bishop of Rome even invited an Imam to pray in the Vatican. It is a blasphemy and a sin against the First Commandment.   

According to current Church thinking, Muslims "profess" the God of Abraham. They have at best a warped and severely distorted view of God. They deny the Blessed Trinity and vehemently so, it is one of the fundamental issues between us and they are explicit about this. They deny the divinity of Christ and His Sonship. They deny his crucifixion and his resurrection and the apostles and their followers were all liars. It has its roots in Arianism.

Yet at the same time, they believe that Jesus is the Messiah who will come again, not to reign as King of kings and Lord of lords but to usher in the "Mahdi" and then be subservient to him, destroy crosses (churches), wipe-out swine, end the jizya (murder Christians) and tell all Christians that he himself, Jesus, is a Muslim and then command us to follow the Mahdi and those that refuse to submit (which is what Islam means) will be killed. This is Islamic eschatology friends. 

Does this not sound like the Antichrist himself spoken of in the Apocalypse of St. John with worship directed to him by another? Does he not come on the scene amidst strife and unify to rule over the whole earth? Is worship of him not directed by another? Islam is from Hell friends, notwithstanding Vatican II and the non-doctrinal, non-dogmatic and non-magisterial actions of our recent popes.  This is the religion of Islam that the Catholic Church's popes pray with and dialogue with. Am I crazy to think this or are they for doing what they do?

Have you wondered about the coming together of the radical left, Islamo-fascist and lately? 

Even though they hate each other, they hate the Church more and they think that after they wipe out the Church and the Jews, then one will prevail and wipe the other out.

The world is burning with rage and it is going to get worse. The Catholic Church, the creation of Our Lord Jesus Christ for the salvation of the world has lost its way. Until we return to "preach Jesus Christ and Him crucified" no matter what the price, the world will not find its way and people will die and souls will be lost. 

All Muslim need to come to Jesus and His Church.

Are all Muslims evil or terrorists? Of course not; but they are deceived. There are 1.5 billion in the world, about the same number as Catholics. How many need to believe in violence and murder and jihad and the Mahdi to cause mayhem? Give me a percentage? Ten, twenty, fifty per-cent? How many are "moderate" whatever that means. Look, if 1% of Muslims are radical and believe in sharia and jihad that is 15,000,000 people. One per cent!

Think about that number for a second.

Let us bombard the Most Blessed Trinity to grant us Our Blessed Mother's protection and the Consecration of Russia to her Immaculate Heart. The errors of Russia have spread to the Church and the West, they have infiltrated the highest offices in both, the smoke is thick with sulphur and the prowling is underway. We cannot evangelise our lost brothers and sister in Islam because we have been weakened by heresy and apostasy. Only by heavenly grace poured out on a united Christianity renewed and reborn in both East and West can we shine the Light of Christ upon them.

Can Our Blessed Mother who appeared at Fatima (a name loved by our Muslim brethren) who love her own name of Maryam spoken of eloquently in their book, the Koran, want them lost forever? She has appeared not only at Fatima but in Zeitoun n Egypt approved by the Church there; and some think she is now appearing in Mosul. Make no mistake, all of these things are intricately connected. Fatima and Russia, Russia and Islam, Putin and Ukraine and these butchers in black. It is all connected and there is only one answer and the answer is Jesus Christ. 

The Consecration of Russia has not happened. The action of it by the Pope in unity with all the bishops of the world will bring forth from heaven grace and power unseen in all history and there will be peace and a renewed Church. Remember, Our Lady said it will be done, but unlike the failure to consecrate France to the Sacred Heart of Jesus, it will not be "too late" but only "late." When it happens, the Church will mourn for what it did not do. For the millions of lives lost on earth and souls lost to heaven. It will do penance for it and we will look back and see what could have been prevented.

It is time for the bishops and cardinals and the pope himself to wake up from this error which has been spread through the Bride of Christ.

The time is short.

Our Lady of Fatima, pray for us.

Vox.

* * * 

William Kilpatrick taught for many years at Boston College. He is the author of several books about cultural and religious issues, including Psychological Seduction; Why Johnny Can’t Tell Right From Wrong; and Christianity, Islam and Atheism: The Struggle for the Soul of the West. He is also the author of a new book entitled Insecurity. His articles have appeared in numerous publications, including Catholic World Report, National Catholic Register, Aleteia, Saint Austin Review, Investor’s Business Daily, and FrontPage Magazine. His work is supported in part by the Shillman Foundation.

He has written three essay for Crisis Magazine and they deserve to be read, absorbed and distributed widely.


NEEDED: A NEW CHURCH POLICY TOWARDS ISLAM
PART 1
PART 2
PART 3

Another article to read and writer to follow is Raymond Ibrahim. Here I recommend, The True History of Christianity and Islam.

Raymond Ibrahim is a Middle East and Islam specialist and author of Crucified Again: Exposing Islam’s New War on Christians (2013) and The Al Qaeda Reader (2007). His writings have appeared in a variety of media, including the Los Angeles Times, Washington Times, Jane’s Islamic Affairs Analyst, Middle East Quarterly, World Almanac of Islamism, and Chronicle of Higher Education; he has appeared on MSNBC, Fox News, C-SPAN, PBS, Reuters, Al-Jazeera, NPR, Blaze TV, and CBN. Ibrahim regularly speaks publicly, briefs governmental agencies, provides expert testimony for Islam-related lawsuits, and testifies before Congress. He is a Shillman Fellow, David Horowitz Freedom Center; a CBN News contributor; a Media Fellow, Hoover Institution (2013); and a Judith Friedman Rosen Writing Fellow, Middle East Forum . Ibrahim’s dual-background -- born and raised in the U.S. by Coptic Egyptian parents born and raised in the Middle East -- has provided him with unique advantages, from equal fluency in English and Arabic, to an equal understanding of the Western and Middle Eastern mindsets, positioning him to explain the latter to the former.

Priest murdered during Mass, throat slit by followers of the evil Mohammed and his bastard god

Islam is from Hell.

Mohammed was an Antichrist.

Notwithstanding what Francis, or other Popes such as Benedict or John Paul II or Paul VI say or Vatican II tries to paint it. 

http://voxcantor.blogspot.ca/2015/02/can-we-ask-has-churchs-pastoral-advice.html

Anti-terrorist police shot two knifemen dead today after they murdered a priest by cutting his throat during a siege inside a church in northern France.
Today’s bloodbath unfolded in the town of Saint-Etienne-du-Rouvray, close to the Normandy city of Rouen.

The clergyman, named as Jacques Hamel, 84, had his throat cut, said a spokesman for the Interior Ministry in Paris. 

Two men rushed into the church via a back entrance during a morning service, soon after 9am. 

French President François Hollande travelled to the scene of the slaughter and said the attackers were "two terrorists who claimed to be from Isis".

France, Germany, Europe in general and we in North America. Return to your faith. Return to Our Lord Jesus Christ and His Social Kingship. There is no victory over this Antichrist, named Islam, without Him.

Catholics and non-Catholic Christians of the world. Wake-up! 

The evil manifested in the world today shows Islam's true colours. It is how it was founded, by the sword, by blood sacrifice of humanity to its false god; - a complete and utter dichotomy of the true sacrifice of God for humanity. Our Lord Jesus Christ, the Second Person of the Holy Trinity, which these Mohammedans deny, came to Earth as a baby and grew to holy manhood. The God-man submitted to take upon himself the sins of the world from all time and for all time. He became sin. He submitted Himself to blood sacrifice as the one and only pure atonement. This priest, Jacques Hamel, may he rest in peace, knew that. It was at this re-presentation of that all-redeeming sacrifice that these Mohammedans took his blood in their lust for death and false sacrifice to a false god, the devil, Satan. May his blood be united with the most Holy Blood of the Lord whom he served and His people.

France has a new priest-martyr.

May he, even now, be enjoying the Beatific Vision and interceding for France, and us all.

Orémus. 

Deus, qui inter apostólicos Sacerdótes fámulum tuum

Jacobus sacerdotáli fecísti dignitáte vigére: præsta, quaésumus; 

ut eórum quoque perpétuo aggregétur consórtio. 

Per Dóminum nostrum Jesum Christum Fílium tuum: 

qui tecum vivit et regnat in unitáte Spíritus Sancti Deus, 

per ómni-a saécula sæculórum. 

Amen

Jesuit James Martin congratulates Party of Death Nominee, Jesuit-educated Tim Kaine

We knew this was going to happen.



One day, this man is going to go before God, if he even really believes in the Particular Judgement. He will be held accountable for his actions, not the least of which was to praise a man who has sold his Catholic soul for less than Wales!

This, is the good little Jesuit student, that James Martin,S.J., congratulates.

"I have a traditional Catholic personal position, but I am very strongly supportive that women should make these decisions and government shouldn't intrude. I'm a strong supporter of Roe v. Wade and women being able to make these decisions. In government, we have enough things to worry about. We don't need to make people's reproductive decisions for them."

At least Mike Pence doesn't pretend to be a Catholic, anymore.

Now, how about this?

Any bets on how long it will take for a chance meeting with a certain Jorge Bergoglio, S.J. for the photo-op to secure the apostate-Catholic vote?

Idiot Bishops - learn your Latin!

Fathers Hunwicke and Zuhlsdorf have written frequently these last two weeks on the mis-translation that bishops are using to smack down the "ad orientem" issue in their dioceses. Father Z covers it again.

If it were not permitted, why is Pope Francis it so?

Just one more reason why the Novus Ordo is a dead letter. It is irreformable. There is no reform of the reform. It is a lost cause. The Novus Ordo Missae, whilst valid, is a deficient liturgy even when celebrated in Latin, ad orientem, with chant as is proper to it, incense, the Confiteor and Roman Canon, and so on. It is deficient because of the Offertory and the changing of ancient Propers and elimination of the historical, 1500 year old Lectionary! It is a bastard rite because of its Offertory and multiplicity of Eucharistic Prayers, none of this authorised or asked for by the glorious Council! 

None of it!

When one takes these deficiencies,combined with priests and bishops who enforce an outdated and incorrect liturgical theology, how can one believe that there is any possibility of reform?

The treatment of Cardinal Sarah was the final straw for me, It happened to coincide with the badly-behaving Catholics at the parish I served at for eight years. Enough! 

No more work in the nervous disorder. Traditional Mass is it.

This is my third Saturday off. Fox and I will enjoy it immensely.

http://wdtprs.com/blog/2016/07/girm-wars-another-front-opens-in-iowa/

GIRM WARS: Another front opens in Iowa

Posted on 22 July 2016 by Fr. John Zuhlsdorf

When the 2000 GIRM was issued (now usually cited as 2002 GIRM because it is in the 2002 Missale Romanum), a question was put to the Congregation for Divine Worship: Can a bishop, in his role as moderator of the Sacred Liturgy in the diocese, forbid ad orientemworship?

On 10 April 2000, the Congregation for Divine Worship issued an official response (Protocol No. 564/00/L) about GIRM 299 (my emphases):