A corporal work of mercy.

A corporal work of mercy.
Click on photo for this corporal work of mercy!

Tuesday 14 February 2023

Has Pope Francis been "manipulated" into promulgating Traditionis custodes?"

Infovaticana, an Italian website has published an article citing Gerhard Cardinal Müller that Pope Francis was manipulated to attack the traditional liturgy. It's been previously reported by Dr. Peter Kwasniewski that Andrea Grillo has had influence in this matter. Having it
confirmed by 
Cardinal Müller is quite astounding. 

Can we dare hope that Pope Francis will realize the manipulation and soften his heart and be a shepherd and father to all the flock, including those smelly sheep on the peripheries? 


Francis manipulated into promulgating Traditionis custodes, says Cardinal Müller

Members of the St. Anselm Athenaeum and others convinced the Holy Father that the Traditional Mass is "divisive" and encouraged him to restrict it until its virtual demise, Cardinal Gerhard Müller argues in his recently published book "In Good Faith."

The decision to promulgate Traditionis custodes, the motu proprio with which Francis abrogates the liberation of his predecessor's Traditional Mass reached in Summorum Pontificum, was "unexpected and for traditionalists it has been like receiving a slap in the face," says Cardinal Gerhard Müller, former prefect for the Doctrine of the Faith, in his recent book "In Good Faith." "The prohibition to attend this form of liturgy has created chasms, has caused suffering. It would have been more useful to distinguish between the substance of the sacraments which derive from Christ through the Apostles, and are essential, and the liturgical form which exists in various rites in the Church", where there are up to 23. 

Müller blames this decision on the pressure of "some professors of the San Anselmo Athenaeum, who approached the Pope and conditioned him for their own interest. Of them I know some according to whom the only legitimate liturgical form is the conciliar, all other forms should disappear, although the Council has broadened the horizons in a harmonious unity on the essential". 

What Benedict wanted with Summorum Pontificum was "to facilitate the unity and progressive inclusion of traditionalists. Years later, under the current pontificate, a group of advisers of Francis went to lament maintaining that Benedict XVI with that measure had taken a false step, causing further divisions and that, to rebalance the situation, it was better to return everything to how it was before. In short, they manipulated Francis," says the Cardinal.

7 comments:

M. Prodigal said...

Manipulated? I do not think so! It is his agenda and has been since before he was illicitly elected pope.

Jeremiah Alphonsus on Youtube said...

M. Prodigal, Francis’s non-papacy has nothing to do with any electoral irregularities. He isn’t a pope simply because he isn’t a Catholic, and he wasn’t a Catholic long before his supposed election. One cannot be the head of a body of which one is not a member.

Tom A. said...

What Bergoglio is telling us is that the Novus Ordo and the True Catholic Roman Rite cannot coexist. They are two different theologies. For once, I agree with Bergoglio. Have nothing to do with the Novus Ordo nor with those associated with it. Good intentions or bad, the Novus Ordo is not Catholic. Treat them as you would any other non Catholic group.

Kathleen1031 said...

His actions against the TLM are entirely consistent with his past words and behavior, lo these many years.

Jonah said...

Kwasniewski gets to the heart of the matter here:

"Progressivism always talks about freedom, but it is authoritarian at its core, working against all inequalities except for the systemic inequality of ruler and ruled that perpetuates the system itself."

This is a fight between the Church in which there is neither master nor slave, and the counterfeit church which strives to perpetuate Imperial Rome, Christianity's ancient enemy and enslaver of humanity. The oligarchy has many agents in Rome, martyring the communion of the saints.

Dorota Mosiewicz-Patalas said...

@ Jermiah Alphonsus

True and simple. Bergoglio has not been a Catholic since before his invalid installment. For yes we should say yes. For no - no.

From own experience I know that refusal to compromise (to sit on the fence, when the issue is clear) is a perfect protection from error, chaos and noise. The revolutionaries only accept "shades of grey". They are too "complex" to stoop down to Christ's simplicity. When I hear: "Well, it is complicated", I smell rot.

Bergoglio tells the young to make noise and be agents of change. He tells them to destroy the Holy Tradition, doesn't he? The one whose responsibility is to protect and continue Tradition, hates it and persecutes those who keep it.

He has the anti-Christ spirit. It is not complicated.

Jeremiah Alphonsus on Youtube said...

Speaking of Kwasniewski, see the following recent post over on the superb Novus Ordo Watch site:

Against the ‘New Papacy’ of Peter Kwasniewski