"It is not licit to convince them of your faith," said Bergoglio just last week in Rome. "Proselytism is the strongest venom against the ecumenical path," as he pounds his fist to ensure we get it.
Wearing his Bandera Fascist Ukrainian virtual signal as a stole, Bergoglio has revealed once again the liar he is.
Once again, a complete and utter denial of the actual words of Our Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ from the Gospel according to St. Matthew beginning at the 16th. verse of the 28th chapter;
"Now the eleven disciples went to Galilee, to the mountain to which Jesus had directed them. When they saw him, they worshipped him; but some doubted. And Jesus came and said to them, ‘All authority in heaven and on earth has been given to me. Go therefore and make disciples of all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit, and teaching them to obey everything that I have commanded you. And remember, I am with you always, to the end of the age."
If Bergoglio were there, we know which group he would have been amongst.
I was kicked off Twitter for calling Bergoglio a liar.
He was a liar then. He is a liar now.
I do it again and would do it to his face.
For more commentary, see Anthony Stine at Return to Tradition.
(5205) Francis Shocks The Faithful With His Most Scandalous Words Yet - YouTube
12 comments:
It's not licit to convince people of the Faith?
Hmmm....
What does St. Paul say?
1 I charge you in the presence of God and of Christ Jesus who is to judge the living and the dead, and by his appearing and his kingdom: 2 preach the word, be urgent in season and out of season, *convince*, rebuke, and exhort, be unfailing in patience and in teaching. 3 For the time is coming when people will not endure sound teaching, but having itching ears they will accumulate for themselves teachers to suit their own likings, 4 and will turn away from listening to the truth and wander into myths. 5 As for you, always be steady, endure suffering, do the work of an evangelist, fulfil your ministry. (2 Tim. 4:1-5, stars added)
Sigh. Not again.
Matthew 10:33
English Standard Version
33 but (A)whoever denies me before men, (B)I also will deny before my Father who is in heaven
In what sense is this person even a mere christian.
He does everything he can to destroy Christianity and Christendom.
It is appalling when someone refers to him as "Holy Father". What a tremendous insult to the popes that preceded this heretical wreck of a papacy. He is an utter disgrace. We live next door to a rooster who crows a lot. We listen to him more closely than we do this person. At least the rooster serves a purpose and he doesn't hurt anybody.
Well for once I agree with Frankie. It is not licit to convince anyone of the Novus Ordo Vatican 2 false faith.
This pretend pope is probably the false prophet the Bible speaks of. He definitely seems to be playing for the other team, not Team Jesus.
Hey Tom A. Where have you been?
He told us we needed to know in the first interview with his close friend, the atheist Scalfari: "God is not Catholic". I called my parents in Poland and told them that the new pope had been publicly denying the Catholic faith. I do not claim that God is a Catholic, but only that JM Bergoglio has let us all know he was a religious relativist, to whom Jesus Christ and His Church were but one expression of faith, equal among all others. Since then his Humbleness prayed to Pachamama and favoured sodomites over God-fearing Catholics. All faithful Catholics impervious to the machinations of Freemasons and Luciferians (may God protect the peace of Cardinal Zen) became a target of Bergoglio's wrath. He has a goal, and in its pursuit he has no intention to tolerate Catholics. He has been exercising the currently criminal so called "hate speech" against us with great zeal. That rainbow priest somewhere on this continent who celebrated trannies in church, speaking about sodomites and sodomy supporters as true Christians not moving with the spirit of this world (as though the remnant of Catholics represented the ways of this world by obeying God, not only in the Traditions of the Church, but also God's commandments, clearly intolerant of debauchery and sodomy) is the fruit of Bergogliansim, or rather of all that led to its rule over us. God have mercy on us all.
I interpret Vatican Council II rationaly with the Rational Premise. I call it Feeneyism. It means looking at invisible cases of the baptism of desire and being saved in invincible ignorance (LG 14 and LG 16) as being physically invisible cases in 2022. This is common sense. Even Bishop Athanasius Schneider and Dr.Taylor Marshall agree with me.
So I affirm Vatican Council II as supporting exclusivist salvation in the Catholic Church. The Council is exclusivist in salvation and it is upon this traditional salvation doctrine that I affirm traditional mission and evangelisation.- Lionel Andrades
The sedevacantists WM Review, Novus Ordo Watch, MHT seminary, Tradcast, CMRI, MHFM support false doctrine on Vatican Council II which is a break with Tradition and so not Anti Semitic.With the Rational Premise it would be ecclesiocentric and missionary. There could be evangelisation based upon the past exclusivist ecclesiology which is not contradicted by Vatican Council II interpreted rationally.
The sedevacantists WM Review cannot agree on a definition of a premise from the Internet. They also cannot decide if we can physically see a baptism of desire case in the present times. So they cannot say if Lumen Gentium 14 and 16 refer to a physically visible or invisible case in 2022.
The sedevacantists cannot answer this simple philosophical question.Can they physically see with their eyes non Catholics in 2022 saved with the baptism of desire or in invincible ignorance?
Of course the answer is NO.
So then how can LG 8,14,16 etc be visible examples of salvation outside the Church and practical exceptions for Feeneyite extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS) for them? For me they are not practical exceptions for EENS. But for the sedevacantists Bishop Donald Sanborn and Bishop Pivarunas, LG 8,14,16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc in Vatican Council II are practical exceptions for the Syllabus of Errors, an Ecumenism of Return and EENS.
So if the WM Review understands what is a premise and that there is a rational and irrational premise in the interpretation of Lumen Gentium etc, then they would have to say, like me, that Vatican Council II does not contradict the past exclusivist ecclesiology. The sedevacantist bishops would have to affirm Feeneyite EENS and this would be Anti Semitic for the Jewish Left.The sedevacantists have property in Florida etc.
So the sedes support false doctrine which is a break with Tradition.-Lionel Andrades
____________________________
The USCCB bishops are not missionary based upon the rational interpretation of Vatican Council II.They want to avoid the Anti Semitic label and other charges from the Left.
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2022/11/the-usccb-bishops-use-common-false.html
Luke 19:28-44
“I tell you,” he replied, “if they keep quiet, the stones will cry out.” Tell it to the stones Francis.
Post a Comment