“A time is coming when men will go mad, and when they see someone who is not mad, they will attack him, saying, 'You are mad; you are not like us.” ― St. Antony the Great
I'll totally hand it to His Excellency on this. He's making a huge statement just by being on War Room. God bless him for seeing things as they are and for demonstrating masculine leadership and courage, not to mention fidelity to Christ, the faith and the flock. We need more like him!
I don't trust this MAGA crowd, Trump is a big time vaxxer. People aren't just dropping dead from heart attacks because it's the new trendy thing to do. At the end of the day it's still the same agenda being pushed from both sides.
OCTOBER 26, 2022 Bishop Athanasius Schneider interpreted Vatican Council II irrationally throughout the interview with Steve Bannon this month. https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2022/10/bishop-athanasius-schneider-interpreted.html
OCTOBER 27, 2022 Bishop Schneider criticizes modernism before Steve Bannon but interprets Vatican Council II with modernism https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2022/10/bishop-schneider-criticizes-modernism.html
I appreciated Bishop Athanasius Schneider's statement at Khazakhistan. He said that there is salvation in only Jesus and in only the Catholic Church. This is the traditional ecclesiocentrism of the Catholic Church, not contradicted by Vatican Council II interpreted rationally, with the Rational Premise. So I thought that Bishop Schneider made that statement at Khazakistan after interpreting the Council II rationally. Since some time back in an interview with Dr. Taylor Marshall, which Vox posted on this website, he said that there are no literal cases of the baptism of desire. So here he was interpreting Lumen Gentium 14 ( baptism of desire) rationally. So I would affirm the same ecclesiocentrism as him and cite Vatican Council II as my reference. But then Bishop Schnedier gave three interviews this month. They were too Steve Bannon, Raymond Arroyon and John Henry Weston and he interpreted Vatican Council II as a break with Tradition and being heretical. This indicated that he was choosing the False Premise of the liberals and popes to interpret the Council. Then he was asked about the Synod. He did not say that at the Synods the laity were all interpreting the Council with the same Irrational and not Rational Premise.This is unethical. The Council should be interpreted honestly.He said nothing about this. It was as if he was being coerced by the Left. Due to leftist fascism within and outside the Church he was going back to the official heretical and schismatic position on Vatican Council II. Why did he not say that Vatican Council II when interpreted rationally is in harmony with Feeneyite EENS and that he affirms Feeneyite EENS and the Athanasius Creed with no known exceptions. -Lionel Andrades
5 comments:
I'll totally hand it to His Excellency on this. He's making a huge statement just by being on War Room. God bless him for seeing things as they are and for demonstrating masculine leadership and courage, not to mention fidelity to Christ, the faith and the flock. We need more like him!
I don't trust this MAGA crowd, Trump is a big time vaxxer. People aren't just dropping dead from heart attacks because it's the new trendy thing to do. At the end of the day it's still the same agenda being pushed from both sides.
OCTOBER 26, 2022
Bishop Athanasius Schneider interpreted Vatican Council II irrationally throughout the interview with Steve Bannon this month.
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2022/10/bishop-athanasius-schneider-interpreted.html
OCTOBER 27, 2022
Bishop Schneider criticizes modernism before Steve Bannon but interprets Vatican Council II with modernism
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2022/10/bishop-schneider-criticizes-modernism.html
I appreciated Bishop Athanasius Schneider's statement at Khazakhistan. He said that there is salvation in only Jesus and in only the Catholic Church. This is the traditional ecclesiocentrism of the Catholic Church, not contradicted by Vatican Council II interpreted rationally, with the Rational Premise.
So I thought that Bishop Schneider made that statement at Khazakistan after interpreting the Council II rationally. Since some time back in an interview with Dr. Taylor Marshall, which Vox posted on this website, he said that there are no literal cases of the baptism of desire. So here he was interpreting Lumen Gentium 14 ( baptism of desire) rationally.
So I would affirm the same ecclesiocentrism as him and cite Vatican Council II as my reference.
But then Bishop Schnedier gave three interviews this month. They were too Steve Bannon, Raymond Arroyon and John Henry Weston and he interpreted Vatican Council II as a break with Tradition and being heretical. This indicated that he was choosing the False Premise of the liberals and popes to interpret the Council.
Then he was asked about the Synod. He did not say that at the Synods the laity were all interpreting the Council with the same Irrational and not Rational Premise.This is unethical. The Council should be interpreted honestly.He said nothing about this.
It was as if he was being coerced by the Left. Due to leftist fascism within and outside the Church he was going back to the official heretical and schismatic position on Vatican Council II.
Why did he not say that Vatican Council II when interpreted rationally is in harmony with Feeneyite EENS and that he affirms Feeneyite EENS and the Athanasius Creed with no known exceptions.
-Lionel Andrades
Post a Comment