Saturday, 23 June 2018

Is Pervert Uncle Teddy McCarrick one of Bella Dodd's grandchildren?

Image result for isabella visono dodd
Bella Dodd, baptised Maria Assunta Isabella Visono, was an Italian immigrant to the United States of America. She was a brilliant woman who attended university in the early 1920's and became transfixed with Bolshevism as did many of her generations at the time. She joined the American Communist Party and rose within its ranks.

After a reversion to the faith in 1950 with the aid of Fulton Sheen, Dodd testified before the United States Senate, in talks and in her book School of Darkness, that the Communist Party was infiltrating all ranks of American society, in fact, this infiltration happened here in Canada and throughout Europe. After all. were we not told in 1917 that "Russia would spread its evils?"

Image result for isabella visono doddDodd also testified that she was personally responsible for placing over one thousand men into Catholic seminaries, men who had no faith, -- atheists, communists, homosexuals, all to become priests and later bishops and cardinals whose mission was the destruction of the Catholic faith. It would not have been a hard sell, These men would have been promised an easy life, respect and prestige, a place to live, free food, security and all the sex with concubines and other communists agents they could want and for those who were so inclined, access to young boys.

Many of these were ordained and became pastors, seminary rectors, vocation directors, bishops and cardinals. Dodd did this work in the 1930's and into the middle 1940's. Those who became rectors and seminary professors and vocation directors and bishops then brought in the next generation, more atheists, communists and especially, the homosexuals.

Theodore McCarrick was ordained in 1958, I was two years old. A decade later, a young boy about my age was experiencing a priest fondling and masturbating him one Christmas before Mass in the sacristy of St. Patrick's Cathedral in New York. That priest was McCarrick. It could have been me, it could have been you, it could have been any one of us.

McCarrick's perversion was well known. Those out there who are his "nephews" must out him, those who protected him must be exposed.

Was McCarrick really a priest? Was he a bishop? Were the Masses he offered valid, the Confessions?

Was McCarrick recruited by one of Bella Dodd's "nephews?" If they did not have the necessary intent were their ordinations and all that flowed from them, valid?

Have millions of Catholics been denied the Sacraments because there is no grace due to a defect in the Sacrament of Ordination, and later, episcopal consecration? Are thousands of priests today, well-meaning and sincere, only really laymen because the bishop who laid hands on them no more a bishop than I?

These filthy frauds must be outed. If that means that the physical Church and its property must collapse, then so be it. Holy Mass in my dining room will have more to offer than all the sacrileges in Cathedrals.

It is time to face up to the reality.


TLM said...

Indeed many really terrifying questions....legitimate questions!! Have we all been receiving invalid sacraments? Unknown to us?? How many Masses and Communions and even Confessions have really been valid?? Just as scary to me is what about our children? And grandchildren? Have they even received ANY valid sacraments unknown to any of us?? What else can we do but cling to Jesus and shelter under the Mantle of our Mother? For comfort, I remember her words: "Through the Rosary and the Scapular, I will save the world." Keep praying the ROSARY....I truly believe it is our 'nuclear weapon'. And consecrate ourselves to her Immaculate Heart and the Sacred Heart of Jesus. They will never abandon us. Against all impossible odds they absolutely will never leave us! May God Bless you with His comfort and His courage and His perseverance through this terror of such a betrayal and storm.

Anonymous said...

Wow. I've been wondering these same questions for a few years now. I have experienced oddness in nearly every Catholic church I've attended. By oddness I mean unexpected, uncatholic words and actions. (I've only been a Catholic for 6 years.)

I just cannot believe that Vox is now asking these questions! It seems we are getting nearer to the schism.

Anonymous said...

And what was so special about Theodore McCarrick that the most powerful cardinal in the US had to ordain him, as if there were no other bishop available?

Anonymous said...

I still think Holy Mass in the dining room needs a Pope. We need a Pope to regularize Tradional Priests ordained in PreVatII Rites. If any of the Novus Ordo Priests want to remain Catholic, like Father RP, they can go through a Catholic Seminary and be validly ordained without doubt.

Irenaeus said...

Apt questions with scary consequences. You have given me something to think about, and an impetus to look into the qualities of ordinations. Thank you, Vox.

NBW said...

Vox, thank you for the excellent post. This raises a lot of questions as to whether McCarrick was part of the infiltration. And YES...the people who know about all this filth should stand up and expose these filthy molesters. I am sure it's not that easy to stand up and possibly lose your job, status, and more...but think of the alternative.... an eternity in Hell. Is your eternal future worth remaining silent?

Barbara Jensen said...

Is Bergoglio one of Bella Dodd's prophetic entities? When will the Catholic Church realize this evil man is no longer pope, if he ever was pope? McCarrick, sodomite name 'Blanche', is merely the tip of the iceberg. The Vatican hierarchy, as well as the bishop pool all over the world, is riddled with sodomites. McCarrick is old news. We are watching the destruction of the Catholic Faith happening right before our eyes, and still the orthodox hierarchy remains silent instead of declaring the schism we clearly are in and upholding the true Faith which will soon be underground. The whining and complaining about Bergoglio's latest 'shocking' statements is getting so old. The wave of horror regarding McCarrick's homosexuality shows how clueless people are choosing to be. He is the tip of the perverse iceberg floating in the ecclesial sea of corruption. Our hierarchy is not going to defend the Faith. The cost is too high and so many of them are hostage to human respect and their clerical reputations. God help us.

Kathleen1031 said...

My only thought on the validity or not of sacraments is this, surely God is not a legalist who would hold responsible the recipient of an invalid sacrament. If a person who is about to die repents, and our faith teaches us that there is such a thing as the "baptism of desire", meaning they are by God considered repented and are forgiven, then why would that only apply to one sacrament. I do not worry about such things. God is in His heaven, and in that sense, it does not seem we can lose anything. We should trust God not to punish us for the incompleteness of another, something we would have no knowledge about but only trust.

I agree, it is time, let the Church fall if she must, we have had the worst happen, our pope is a rogue destroyer, laying waste to the faith, and we see how our Cardinals and bishops are in agreement or faithless cowardice. What difference does it make. He is not accidentally a bad pope, he is with all intention a bad pope, and we see he has all the power and we have none. Save one thing.
He cannot force us to accept his apostasy as the Catholic faith.
That is all we have, except prayer.
We do not have to attend.
We do not have to support, in any way. In fact, we may scandalize others by supporting.
We do not have to tithe or financially support.

I believe we must see things as they are. For my family, at this point, the Church has become a scandal entire, and we will not support it. We currently attend but even that may end.
But we remain Catholic forever.
Let these sodomites and destroyers, these diddlers of little boys and young men, all be outed! If the Church falls, it will be with God's permitting will. It is not in our hands, it is in His.

MaryP said...

To validly administer a sacrament, the minister must only intend what the church intends. He does not have to believe it.

MaryP said...

There are no scary consequences, except in the lives of the victims and the souls of the scandalized. One does not need anything but the intention to do what the Church intends in order to validly administer a sacrament, and these guys definitely wanted their guys to be truly ordained. They wanted power, and ultimate power for them is the power to blaspheme and pervert the sacraments.

Ana Milan said...

Bella Dodd should have been made to proffer a list of the names of all those deviants whom she was responsible for placing in Catholic seminaries. Surely both the Law & the CC would have required this information? Even on her deathbed she appears to have been defiant herself in not handing over such data & Bishop Sheen could have pressed for this to be done as part of her repentance & absolution. This was an enormous sin against Christ & His Church & coming from a baptised Catholic it was infamy.

Johnno said...

I've long wondered if something of this sort is what was in the 3rd Secret of Fatima.

Consider this -

Lucia, as a child saw Hell first hand. This was one of the Secrets. And she had no trouble describing it and writing it down.

But the 3rd Secret sacred her and she had immense trouble committing it to writing.

We must ask ourselves - what could be scarier than Hell???

The only thing I can consider is - the idea that I am going there - to Hell - forever.

And the only relevant thing I can think of that could scare Sr. Lucia is... that somehow the means for us to avoid Hell will in some way be compromised or taken away - i.e. - the Sacraments, The Mass, Confession etc.

That's scary!

But at the same time, it is possible that the Devil would rather than getting rid of the Sacraments, would instead prefer to keep them valid, but in a state that the actions of the clergy and laity anger God - which basically means this -

The absence of Sacraments unbeknownst to us and out of the control of the laity - is a MITIGATING circumstance - for which the laity are not responsible.

But the desecration or irreverence shown to the REAL Sacraments - brings direct CONDEMNATION on one-self - and thus leads to Hell.

God may act more leniently with the former. But will be furious at the latter.

Valid, but compromised/desecrated Sacraments suit the Devil's purpose better.

So I think the Sacraments and Holy Orders are valid, possibly deficient, but only to the extent that it actually makes things worse.

After all, if the Devil were just going to get rid of the Sacraments, he would've likely kept all the outward appearances and ceremony intact. NOT SO with the Novus Ordo.

Fr. VF said...

Before entering into this discussion, everyone should become educated on the heresy of Donatism. It is a heresy that seems reasonable to amateur theologians.

Vox Cantoris said...

I know what Donatism is. It is not a question of the priest’s sanctity, it is the intention at ordination. If a marriage can be declared null because the person lied or had malicious intent why not ordination?

tuleesh said...

“These filthy frauds must be outed. If that means that the physical Church and its property must collapse, then so be it.”

Some 15-20 years ago a bishop—Fabian Bruskewitz, I believe—said something similar when the sexual abuse by priests began to make news. I don’t recall the exact words, but he did emphasize that if the Gospel had to be preached under a tent, then so be it. It’s not like that wasn’t how it was done originally by the Apostles.

Anonymous said...

Sad that in certain parts of Australia there is a clamour to break the absolute seal of confession...

Tancred said...

It’s absurd that the usual suspects want to paint this progressivist as a conservative. It reminds me of Romero, actually.

S said...

To receive any, a state of grace or perfect contrition is required of the recipient for validity. I believe it to be reasonable to believe NO sacraments offered or even recieved by unrepentant sodomites would be valid.

Adam Michael said...

Sacraments are valid regardless of the disposition of the recipient. If the celebrant uses proper matter, form, and intention, the sacrament is validly confected. However, the recipient's sins can hinder in part or in total the sacramental graces that would otherwise be received in the reception of the valid sacrament.

Oremus said...

For Ana Milan: In years past, I recall reading that Bishop Sheen himself advised Bella Dodd NOT to release the names of those she placed in seminaries. Thus even at her death, as you state, she was "resisting"--that was probably because of her obedience. What a shame that she could not/would not identify those men. I suspect we would recognize many names.


Anonymous said...

Can't Dr. Alice von Hildebrand reveal more of what Bella Dodd had told her? I mean, the lady was dead for decades and Dr. Alice is in her 90s...

Anonymous said...

Christ did not remove Judas though He knew he was a traitor,and what his end would be.

Anonymous said...

Laney Williams said...

I think you are confusing intent (planned outcome of the action) with motives (psychological reason for the action). The intent was to ordain. They wanted valid priests, otherwise the scheme would not work. Their state of mind is irrelevant to validity. It could/would be gravely sinful but still valid (to believe otherwise would be donatism).

Anonymous said...

Ben said...

"To validly administer a sacrament, the minister must only intend what the church intends".

This is not quite right, and the difference is important. The minister does not even need to intend what the Church intends...

Beyond valid form and matter, all that is required is that the minister intend to do what the Church does, and the use of valid form is generally sufficient for expressing this intention.

Anonymous said...

The God who made the world and everything in it, being Lord of heaven and earth, does not live in shrines made by man.

JtM said...

I, personally don't worry about the "validity" of the sacraments. My trust is and always will be in Jesus Christ, and His unfathomable Mercy. Reading these comments, the following revelation of Our Lord to Mutter Vogel comes to mind:
"One should Never attack a priest, even when he's in error, rather one should pray and do penance that I'll grant him My grace again. He alone fully represents Me,even when he doesn't live after my example!" (Pg 29, Mutter Vogel's Worldwide Love, St. Grignion Publishing House, Altoting, South Germany (29 6 1929
It goes on to say:
"When a priest falls we should extend him a helping hand THROUGH PRAYER AND NOT THROUGH ATTACKS! I Myself will be his judge. NO ONE BUT I! Whoever voices judgement over a priest has voiced it over Me; child never let a priest be attacked, take up his defence. (Feast of Christ the King 1937). Child, never judge your confessor, rather pray much for him and offer every Thursday, through the hands of My Blessed Mother, Holy Communion (for him) (18 6 1039). Never again accept an out-of-the-way word about a priest, and speak no unkind word (about them), EVEN IF IT WERE TRUE! Every priest is My vicar and My Heart will be sickened and insulted because of it! If you hear a judgement (against a priest) pray a Hail Mary.(28 6 1939)
If you see a priest who celebrates the Holy Mass unworthily then say nothing about him, rather tell it to Me alone! I stand beside him on the altar. Oh pray much for My priests, that they'll love purity above all, that they'll celebrate the Holy Sacrifice of the Mass with pure hands and heart. Certainly the Holy Sacrifice is one and the same even when its celebrated by an unworthy priest, but the grace's carried down upon the people is not the same! (28 2 1938)"
Mary, Queen of the Clergy, pray for them.
Whether or not you believe this revelation, I trust in His Mercy that I am receiving His Body, Blood, Soul and Divinity in the Holy Eucharist. Our Loving Saviour would not withhold Himself from parishioners receiving Him in Faith, whether from a worthy or unworthy priest. Please, can we pray for unity instead of talking schism? I am Catholic, I love my faith, I thank God for my faith, and nothing or no one will ever stop me, willingly, from receiving Jesus in Holy Communion.
Heavenly Father, I offer you the Most Precious Body, Blood, Soul and Divinity of Your Dearly Beloved Son, our Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ in union with All the masses said throughout the world today, for all the holy souls in purgatory, for sinners everywhere, sinners in the Universal Church, those in my own home and within my own family. Jesus I trust in You.
God Bless you all.

Anonymous said...

The only person I can think of who is alive and may be able to answer this question is Alice von Hildebrand.

Unknown said...

No. That is only a requirement for licity. If a man being ordained is not in a state of grace when he receive the sacrament of Holy Orders, he commits a sacrilege but he is still a priest.

Anonymous said...

How can the hands that raped and sodomized a child on a Saturday night, "consecrate" a host and turn it into the Body of Our Lord Jesus Christ on Sunday?
Does anyone truly think that our dear Lord would dwell inside of a man who would commit such abominations?
Are pedophiles, pederasts, or active homosexual priests consecrated men simply because at one time they took "Holy Orders?"
Jesus said that anyone who harmed one of these little ones (the children), that it would be better for them to have a millstone tied around their neck and be thrown into the sea.
How did a church supposedly founded by Jesus himself, cover up, confuse, confound and defend these homosexual pedophiles?