“A time is coming when men will go mad, and when they see someone who is not mad, they will attack him, saying, 'You are mad; you are not like us.” ― St. Antony the Great
When I wrote this a few days ago on the coming Antichrist being a pacifist, ecologist and ecumenist and the Meeting of Popular Movements, I had no idea that the group to which the Bishop of Rome wrote was a Soros project. This letter by Bergoglio is a disgusting and blatant interference in the political discourse of the United States of America. He shows himself to be a globalist and a Marxist. He needs to focus on Christ and the salvation of souls. The fact that he does not discloses him. False Prophet or Antichrist?
On 17 February, Pope Francis released a letter written for those gathered for the World Meeting of Popular Movements held in California from 16-19 February — a meeting organized by the Vatican. Such meetings regularly take place in the Vatican and are initiated by Pope Francis himself in his attempt to work together with a variety of grassroots movements world-wide.
More from the corrupted episcopacy in Malta. They do not want faithful Catholics, they want corrupted seminarians that are as effeminate and distorted as they are. Will the Catholics of Malta rise up?
BLOGS | FEB. 20, 2017
Malta’s Archbishop: Seminarians Can Leave if They Don't Agree With Pope Francis
Instruction comes as it emerges priests who disagree with bishops’ interpretation of Amoris Laetitia are being bullied and intimidated.
The Archbishop of Malta has confirmed to the Register that he told the country’s seminarians earlier this month that if any of them do not agree with Pope Francis, “the seminary gate is open,” implying they are free to leave.
Archbishop Charles Scicluna’s remarks are the latest in what Church sources in Malta say is a heavy-handed crackdown on any ecclesiastic unwilling to subscribe to the Maltese bishops’ interpretation of the apostolic exhortation, Amoris Laetitia — an interpretation the bishops say is identical to the Holy Father’s.
A few days ago, the news broke that Gregory Baum, a former Augustinian priest, theologian and peritus at Vatican II is a sodomite. The word "homosexual" is only from the late 19th century. It is a nonsensical word mean man-sex, here we will choose to use the perfectly good biblical word, sodomite. The news about Baum was self-revealed in his book, published last November; it seems that nobody really read it until recently that the news should come out. Baum engaged in his first perverted behaviour with another man, a fellow priest, in 1964, one year after the end of the Second Vatican Council and four years before he, along with Remi de Roo, brow-beat weak, ineffective and probably effeminate Canadian bishops to dissent against Humanae Vitae and whose reasoning of "conscience" is now used by Bergoglio and his clerical henchmen, to betray the Lord Jesus and the faithful on matters of adultery. Dissent is all related to matters below the belly button.
Raymond Lahey was the Bishop of Antigonish, in Nova Scotia. On a trip back from Bangkok; yes, you can ask, "why was a Canadian bishop vacationing in Bangkok, Lahey was arrested and later charged and convicted of having child pornography on his laptop computer. The evidence showed that Lahey used the exploitation and sexual degradation of children for his own masturbatory fantasies. The pervert bishop also engaged in at least a ten-year long sodomitical relationship. He has been defrocked.
This writer is aware of more, many more. Auxiliary Bishops. Seminary professors.
Pastors. The Church in Canada is infiltrated at all levels with men who have no love of the true faith and no love of Christ. There goal is to destroy the Church and the faith of the people. They must be outed.
Bishop of Rome Bergoglio has issued a bulletin to the Meeting of Popular Movements meeting in Modesto, California. It is ironic considering that he previously equated the populism that elected Donald J. Trump as President of the United States with the national socialism of Adolf Hitler, but gives a warm statement to these populists. Clearly, Bergoglio does not oppose populism, only the populism that doesn't agree with his form of Peronist-Marxist populism. Reading the diatribe, one clearly sees it as just one more poorly veiled attack on the American President.
The whole bulletin, a diatribe of leftist excrement that could have been written by George Soros, can be read on the Vatican web page. He also states in this Marxist social justice essay that, "Muslim terrorism does not exist." Tell that to the people who have suffered from Muslim terrorism.
I know that you have
committed yourselves to fight for social justice, to defend our Sister Mother
Earth and to stand alongside migrants. I want to reaffirm your choice and share
two reflections in this regard.
First,
the ecological crisis is real. “A very solid scientific consensus indicates
that we are presently witnessing a disturbing warming of the climatic system.” Science is not the only form of knowledge, it
is true. It is also true that science is not necessarily “neutral”—many times
it conceals ideological views or economic interests. However, we also know what
happens when we deny science and disregard the voice of Nature. I make my own
everything that concerns us as Catholics. Let us not fall into denial. Time is
running out. Let us act. I ask you again—all of you, people of all backgrounds
including native people, pastors, political leaders—to defend Creation.
The Bishop of Rome cannot compel you, he cannot compel me to believe junk science. There is strong evidence that the world has been cooling for nearly a decade due to sun spot activity. It is a geological fact that fossils of ferns and palms exist in Greenland and northern Alberta indicating that at another time in history, the earth was warmer than it is now. Climate changes, period.
He cannot compel you he cannot compel me to refuse to state that millions of Muslims are terrorists or support terrorism. There are 1.5 billion in the world, if 1% support terrorism, that is 15,000,000 and there is more than 1%. But there are no Muslim terrorists.
Now, to the real matter at hand.
How sad, how distressing that Holy Mother Church has sold out to the world. How much of a betrayal that the very Bishop of Rome himself, should buy in to false oecumenism, junk environmental science and misplaced pacifism while Christians, and in fact, many Muslims, lose their peace, their property and their lives to radical Islamic terrorists.
This
year’s selection when it became known created a stir since Cardinal Biffi,
while he is known for orthodox faith and frank words, is most well known, at
least in the secular media, for his preaching on the Antichrist. In fact, the Times of London reported in 2004
that the Cardinal described the Antichrist as "walking among us".
The
Lenten retreat did not disappoint.
Cardinal Biffi picked up on his oft repeated theme of the Antichrist,
basing his remarks on the works of Vladimir Soloviev, a Russian religious
philosopher who has received praise from Pope Benedict prior to his elevation
to the pontificate.
Quoting Soloviev, the Cardinal said "the
Antichrist presents himself as pacifist, ecologist and ecumenist."
"He
will convoke an ecumenical council and will seek the consensus of all the
Christian confessions, granting something to each one. The masses will follow
him, with the exception of small groups of Catholics, Orthodox and
Protestants," he said according to a Zenit translation of a Vatican Radio
summary here: http://www.radiovaticana.org/it1/Articolo.asp?c=120479 (no longer there)
In his "Tale of the Antichrist"
Solovyov foresees that a small group of Catholics, Orthodox and Protestants
will resist and will say to the Antichrist: "You give us everything,
except what interests us, Jesus Christ".
For Cardinal Biffi, this narrative is a warning: "Today, in fact,
we run the risk of having a Christianity which puts aside Jesus with his cross
and resurrection."
The 78-year-old
cardinal added that if Christians "limited themselves to speaking of
shared values they would be more accepted on television programs and in social
groups. But in this way, they will have renounced Jesus, the overwhelming
reality of the resurrection."
...
Cardinal
Biffi affirmed that "if Christianity—on opening itself to the world and
dialoguing with all—dilutes the salvific event, it closes itself to a personal
relationship with Jesus and places itself on the side of the Antichrist."
Our dad abandoned our mother. He left us to be raised by another. He was a coward for abandoning us and he was selfish. He cares more about his piano and Mozart and his reading and writing than he does about you and me. He walks in a garden and contemplates. We suffer. Some say he was courageous for leaving. What fools these are. There was nothing courageous about it. We were lied to. He lied to us. We thought he loved us. We thought he was the best darn dad we could ever have. But he betrayed us and our mother. Now, our new dad is a bully. He is abusive and vindictive and does not like us very much. He calls us names and insults us. He tells us to believe unproven science, he demands we let people who would destroy us into our house. He does not like us. He does not like our mother much either. He goes through the motions and often sneers at her for the nice clothes and perfume she wears and the way she has decorated the house. He has moved in to the family house and has taken it over. He is an abusive spouse to our mother we are now his abused and neglected children. Got it?
Gregory Baum was one of Canada's "experts" at the Second Vatican Council. Upon his return, the then set out to influence your predecessors against Humanae Vitae and to declare their dissent and create de facto schism from the Church in the Winnipeg Statement. Those words then are now used by the Bishop of Rome and others to justify their scandalous plan to dismiss mortal sin and the Sixth Commandment and to defame the Holy Eucharist.
Gregory Baum admits to having a sodomitical relationship with another man around 1964, just after the conclusion of the Second Vatican Council and prior to the Winnipeg Statement. No doubt, Baum knew quite well at Vatican II that he was already a sodomite in thought, if not in action.
Baum dissented from the Church's teaching and broke his vows to the Church and his Augustinian Order. Later, he continued by leaving his Order, and marrying a woman without even being laicised and then breaking whatever vows he made to her be engaging in degrading and perverted sexual behaviour with other men.
Yet, to this day, the Winnipeg Statement on which Gregory Baum was a major influence, still stands notwithstanding various attempts, to clarify current thinking, nor will one rarely hear from the pulpit, the rightness of Humane Vitae.
Baum's entire life has been a lie. The man has engaged in deception for decades and admits it in his book.
Given now the clear revelations from this man directly that he was a dissenter and a betrayer of Christ and His Church, his vows and nature itself, will you know do your duty? Will you now rise up and condemn the Winnipeg Statement! Will you now cause all - yourselves and all Canadian priests, religious and faithful to do public penance and reparation in our churches for this error? Or, objectively speaking, will you burn in Hell along with the filthy pervert Baum so praised on the Salt + Light program Witness by Tom Rosica, which you support and encourage with the money from the Catholic faithful? Imagine that, eh? You, dear bishop, in Hell with Gregory Baum looking back at you and laughing at you for all eternity, along with "Normand."
“Tip-offs III: the great “renewals” of Bergoglio” by Fra
CristoforoLet me tell you a story. Last Thursday, in a coffee bar in
front of the Porta S. Anna (facing Vatican City) a Monsignor (very close to
Bergoglio) in his 50's and a layman go for a coffee. The discussion turns to the
“dubia”.
The Monsignor, with an “enough” says: “The Pope will never
answer the “dubia” of the 4 Cardinals. He will never lower himself to their
level. Francis has much bigger plans, which do not stop with Italy. The only
hitch during this period has been the election of Trump.”
To which the layman replied: “And what has Trump got to do
with Amoris Laetitia?”
“He has everything to do with it” replied the Monsignor,
continuing: “the aim was to back Clinton, because she has a special
relationship with Francis. They’re in frequent contact. And the goal to be
reached was that the Catholic Church was to rehabilitate certain “non
negotiable” principles in a soft manner, in such a way that the Vatican too
would have had strong global political support, which is needed at this time,
above all for the big manoeuvres which are coming.”
About this we must agree with the great Assange… read here …
The layman even more amazed says: “And which manoeuvres are
coming?”
The Monsignor sips the last drops of coffee and says: “But
have you still not understood that the vision which you have of the Church has
been left behind?
“…But do you not understand that today the Pope is a world
leader? That had Ratzinger stayed we’d all be finished. Do you know what the
next manoeuvre will be? Precisely the diaconate for women. Because it’s the
only way to show our concrete closeness to the Lutherans and Anglicans. And you
will see that by November we will have the diaconate for women. Not of course
identical with what you think. But it will come very close.”“BY NOVEMBER.”
~
There it is, in so many words what was said confidentially
by the Monsignor of the Secretariat of State.
Now let us take a moment to reflect. Saint Peter’s Square is
by this point almost always empty (and ‘TV 2000’ only films that small group of
people crowded together in front of the window.) What do the faithful matter to
Bergoglio? From the contents of this conversation it can be inferred that the
Argentinean has plans much broader than evangelisation. Often and willingly he
has said that evangelisation is a form of proselytism, which is not OK. Just
recently he even said that he is worried that in certain congregations there
are many vocations.
There you are. He seeks only himself. He seeks to keep the
spotlights on himself, and not to tread on anyone’s toes, because he is the
LEADER.
And Jesus Christ does not concern him. How unlike St Paul.
The Apostle to the gentiles said “we are become as the refuse of the world” (1
Cor 4,9-13) precisely because in first place he put evangelisation. Bergoglio
instead, to the prejudice of Christ and of the salvation of souls, wants the
first place for himself.
Dear readers, this is the reality. And in a week there will
be more appalling news. But I won’t anticipate the press releases.
The reason behind my anonymity is this. I am a priest, but I
HAVE TO be anonymous. Otherwise I would no longer have any way of writing these
things to you. I have reflected on this a great deal in these last months. But
I still cannot reveal myself publicly. I do however still think it important
that the faithful “understand” the dynamics which are evolving in the See of Peter.
And these discussions at the coffee bar are for me extremely relevant, and in
conscience I have to communicate them to you.
It turns out that Gregory Baum, a Jew, turned Catholic, Augustinian Priest, Vatican II Periti, Apostate, who abandoned the Bride of Christ for a woman and became a Presbyterian, now admits to abandoning all to declare himself a sodomite! In a story by Christine Niles at ChurchMilitant, Baum reveals in:
A new book by a priest who led the vanguard of
dissent on birth control in Canada reveals for the first time his decades
living as an active homosexual. Father Gregory Baum, a laicized priest married
to a former nun for 30 years, admits in his forthcoming autobiography The Oil
Has Not Run Dry that his wife did not mind the fact that he had a gay
priest-lover on the side.
Tommy Rosica, a Basilian priest, who has just announced his departure from coordination of the World Youth Daze, has said of Baum:
"Gregory, we've known each other for a
long time. ... I've certainly admired very much your theology, your writings,
but also your love of the Church, your love of Christ, and you help to keep
alive not only the spirit of the Second Vatican Council but the authentic
teaching of the Council."
Baum reports that he was in love with and had sodomitical relations with a priest, first in London and then in Montreal. But that priest did not love him back in the same way.
"Shirley did not mind that, when we moved
to Montreal in 1986, I met Normand, a former priest, with whom I fell in
love," Baum writes in Chapter 32. "My love for Normand has never
changed: his presence delights me to this day. While Normand is gay and
welcomed my sexual embrace when we were younger (I was sixty-three when I met
him, (ewww) he was forty-six), he did not love me as I did him:(Oh cry me a river!) He simply regards me
as a great friend for who [sic] he makes room in his life. I fully accept
this."
Gregory, when you die, you will go to Hell. You will know in a moment, in a twinkling of an eye of your last breath. You will go there for betraying Christ, His Church, your second wife, a former nun, and nature.
Hell Gregory, Hell!
Repent, and be saved.
Perhaps Tom can have him on Witness again to ask him for a philosophical and theological dissertation on the joy of oral copulation, felching and rimming and whether or not he contracted HIV and gave it to his wife. What about fisting, Rosica? Can you have Baum on a Witness from program to discuss if Baum has experience with fisting, or with gerbils? Does Baum now need to wear diapers because his sphincter no longer keeps it all in? Tells us Thomas J. Rosica, interview him again so that we can now what Baum thinks of coprophilia and if he has engaged in coprophagia? Or do we ask Bergoglio since he seems to know so much about it? Surely, it would be good to know if Baum engaged in analingus with that priest in 1964 in London, and what about Normand?
What a filthy, vile,disgusting bundle of sticks is this Baum!
And what bishop thought this filthy pervert worthy to have hands laid upon him for ordination?
How much do those of us in the English-speaking world owe Sandro Magister. For years now, this blogger has frequently linked and quoted him. He is true in faith and erudite in his analysis. He has suffered for it at the hands of Vatican apparatchiks. Once again, we see the villains that have taken over Rome http://magister.blogautore.espresso.repubblica.it/2017/02/16/communion-for-all-catholics-and-protestants-words-of-kasper-or-rather-of-the-pope/ Remain true friend. Do not despair. Pray your Rosary, pray the Divine Office linked to the right above, or if need be, the modern Liturgy of the Hours, also linked above. I cannot stress enough the importance of attending the traditional Rite of the Holy Sacrifice of the Mass.
16 Feb
Communion For All, Catholics and Protestants. Words of Kasper, Or Rather of the Pope
The obscurity with which Pope Francis loves to speak and write on the most controversial questions is one of the constants of his magisterium, an obscurity that reached its summit in the response that he gave on November 15, 2015 to a Lutheran woman married to a Catholic, who was asking him if she too could receive communion at Mass:
Cardinal Parolin of the UnHoly See is "concerned" about populism. Too bad this pompous heresiarch isn't concerned about the loss of souls.
Populism: [noun] Oxford1. Support for the concerns of ordinary people. 1.1 The quality of appealing to or being aimed at ordinary people.
I mean, we wouldn't want to care too much about the "concerns of ordinary people," now would we, Cardinal Capo? Cardinal Parolin: Holy See "concerned" about populism
Vatican Secretary of State, Cardinal Pietro Parolin, with Italian Prime Minister, Paolo Gentiloni, left, and Italian president Sergio Mattarella, during a ceremony to commemorate the anniversary of the signing of the Lateran Pacts in 1929. - AP
15/02/2017 13:43
SHARE:
(Vatican Radio) The Vatican Secretary of State, Cardinal Pietro Parolin, on Tuesday evening said the Holy See is “concerned” about the emergence of populism.
The chief Vatican diplomat was speaking after meeting with Italian President Sergio Mattarella, Prime Minister Paolo Gentiloni, and other officials for an annual summit at the Italian Embassy to the Holy See, commemorating the signing of the Lateran Pacts between the Holy See and Italy in 1929.
Cardinal Parolin said closing in on oneself is “never a good policy.”
“The inability to welcome and integrate can be dangerous,” – the Cardinal said – “History teaches us this, and we hope that in this sense it will not be repeated.”
He also said the European project must be “relaunched,” ahead of the 60th anniversary of the signing of the Treaty of Rome in 1957, which created the European Economic Community (ECC), the forerunner of the European Union.
The vote by Great Britain to leave the European Union, as well as the rise of Eurosceptic parties in other countries, has been causing a crisis within European institutions.
“It is obvious there are many tensions, many difficulties, but they are also able to become, as they say, a ‘kairos’ - an opportune moment - to reset the political relationship on a new basis,” the Cardinal said.
Cardinal Parolin told journalists the two sides also spoke about social issues in Italy, especially “migration, unemployment, and youth.”c
He is stinking episcopal swine. He oozes a stench of evil. He is a corrupt and arrogant ignoramus. Cursed by the teats that gave nourishment to this boil on the Body of Christ. He looks quite pleased with himself, eh? Father Gerald E. Murray, writing at First Things, gives a true Catholic perspective on this cretin.
“CANON XI.- If any one saith, that faith alone
is a sufficient preparation for receiving the sacrament of the most holy
Eucharist; let him be anathema. And for fear lest so great a sacrament may be
received unworthily, and so unto death and condemnation, this holy Synod
ordains and declares, that sacramental confession, when a confessor may be had,
is of necessity to be made beforehand, by those whose conscience is burthened
with mortal sin, how contrite even soever they may think themselves. But if any
one shall presume to teach, preach, or obstinately to assert, or even in public
disputation to defend the contrary, he shall be thereupon excommunicated.” Council of Trent
From Vulgar Latin *cacca, from Ancient Greek
κάκκη (kákkÄ“, “dung”).