More on Bishops and banning the unclean from the Mass and Sacraments

https://www.crisismagazine.com/2021/vaccine-passports-for-mass?mc_cid=69075995e1&mc_eid=9f8795a47d

THE ENEMIES OF SUMMORUM PONTIFICUM WANT WAR - Paix Liturgique. AND THEY WILL GET IT! - Vox Cantoris

A warning to Bergoglio, Parolin, Ouellette, Roche and the rest of these effetes, hirelings and Christ-hating demonic episcopal scum. If you want war, you will get war. 

This is not 1969. This is not even 1965. We are not our parents.

Forewarned is forearmed!

There is no going back.

Paix Liturgique France

Our 805 letter published on June 28, 2021 

THE ENEMIES OF SUMMORUM PONTIFICUM WANT WAR

"You are going to have a new Motu proprio in the coming days or weeks," Bishop Minnerath, Archbishop of Dijon, told the faithful of the traditional Mass who came to demonstrate their displeasure in front of the bishopric on June 26. But even before the publication of this text, if it is well published, the testimonies on the intentions of the enemies of the previous motu proprio, that of Benedict XVI multiply: 

Thus, Cardinal Parolin, Secretary of State, said before a group of cardinals: "We must put an end to this Mass forever!" Bishop Roche, the new Prefect of the Congregation of Divine Worship, explained with a laugh to seminary officials in Rome and members of the Curia, all English-speaking: "Summorum Pontificum is practically dead! We will give power back to the bishops on this point, but especially not to the conservative bishops." 

It should also be noted that Bishop Minnerath, who opened hostilities against the traditional community of Dijon, is a member of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith and therefore finds himself every month in Rome, immersed in the circles of the Curia that prepared the offensive against Summorum Pontificum. 

Benedict XVI's motu proprio Summorum Pontificum of 2007 was a compromise that ingeniously established a coexistence between the Mass of Paul VI and the Tridentine Mass, in other words, it is true, between water and fire. The fact remains that the peace achieved has been widely acclaimed by the Christian people, whether or not they attend the old Mass, as all our surveys have shown. 

It is known, since the Pope spoke about it at the Conference of Bishops of Italy on Pentecost Monday, that the new text will reduce the possibility of diocesan priests to celebrate traditional Mass. In addition, measures should be taken to lead the priests of the Ecclesia Dei institutes to also celebrate the new Mass and to bring both this new Mass and the conciliar magisterium into the training given in the seminaries of these communities. 

Proponents of liturgical reform have become aware of the importance of the traditional world 

The exasperation, which animates the supporters of liturgical reform in the face of the opposition they have met from the beginning, has been revived with the arrival of Pope Francis. It continues to grow as time passes and the pontificate logically moves towards its completion: we must put an end as soon as possible to this opposition to the Council to which Pope Benedict XVI had given a space of liturgical freedom. 

The offensive was led by a pressure group in the Curia and among the Italian bishops who worked to make roman decision-makers understand that the two masses in attendance, the traditional mass and the new mass, represented two incompatible doctrinal states: that of Vatican II and that of before Vatican II. The great idea of Andrea Grillo, professor of liturgy at the Roman University of St. Anselm, is that Summorum Pontificum has introduced an aberrant state of "liturgical exception", which puts the traditional liturgy and the new liturgy on an equal footing, which is monstrous and unbearable*. 

In addition, these hardline conciliars have come to understand that the traditional world, with its priests, its faithful, its works, its schools, which they affected to consider as marginal and despicable, represents in reality a significant weight, especially as the conciliar world for its part is becoming exhausted and is increasingly fading. 

Hence this desire to bring the Summorum Pontificum galaxy into the common law. Undoubtedly what concerns the traditional liturgy and its specialized actors, the priests of the Ecclesia Dei communities, will now be the domain of competence of the Congregation for Divine Worship, which is by its function in charge of the new liturgy. The extraordinary form will therefore be subordinate to the ordinary law of the ordinary form. This could be very expensive, for example, if the authorization to celebrate in extraordinary form were conditional on participation at regular intervals in the new liturgy, or on the use of the calendar of the ordinary form, or the new lectionary. All at the discretion of the diocesan bishops, to whom the management of this "tolerance" would be entrusted, the Congregation for Divine Worship always giving them reason against the priests, the faithful and the Ecclesia Dei communities. The conservative bishops, as Bishop Roche implies, were under surveillance. 

Doves and falcons 

However, the present pontificate, that of a pope who is already 84 years old, seems to be entering a difficult phase. Opposition to his liberal line has always been very strong among conservatives and traditionalists. But in addition, he is now meeting with discontent from a number of those who have supported him until now. 

More than a grumbling, a declared hostility. The historian Alberto Melloni, director of the John XXIII Foundation, also known as the Bologna School, is a major intellectual in progressive Italian Catholicism. On June 14, in the largest left-wing daily, La Repubblica, to which he regularly gives articles, he published a solemn warning to the Pope entitled "Il giugno neo della Chiesa", The Black June of the Church (an allusion to what left-wing historians call "The Black Week of the Council", this week when the most serious crisis took place in the course of Vatican II). Melloni lists Francis' bad practices against figures who were nevertheless close to him, of whom he made enemies: the way in which he refused by a letter made public the resignation of German Cardinal Marx; the confirmation of the dismissal of Enzo Bianchi, Melloni's great friend, because of "serious problems in the exercise of authority" from the ultra-ecumenical monastery of Bose; the visit of a commissioner, ordered against the Congregation for the Clergy after the resignation of Cardinal Stella, 80, one of the pillars of the Bergoglian pontificate; the economic control launched against the services of the Vicariate of Rome of Cardinal De Donatis; the search launched to feed the charges deemed too weak against Cardinal Becciu, accused of economic embezzlement in London when he was Deputy of the Secretary of State. Melloni concludes: either Francis is surrounded by advisers who are bullies, or he has remained the authoritarianist he was when he led the Society of Jesus in Argentina. Let the Pope beware: "He is preparing for a storm!" 

Part of the "left" is therefore seeking to free itself from a chaotic mode of government. It is not surprising, therefore, that some prelates, who are not very friendly to the ancient liturgy, give Francis advice of caution: this is really not the time to open a new liturgical war today. They join Cardinal Ladaria, "on the right", who has put the brakes on this issue. 

In doing so, these doves stand out from the hawks of the Secretary of State and the Congregation of Divine Worship. The hawks seem to prevail: "We must end this Mass forever!" (Cardinal Parolin); "Summorum Pontificum is practically dead!" (Bishop Roche). 

The front of refusal is preparing 

A front of refusal is being prepared, as predicted by the noise raised by the revelation of the fiddling of Summorum Pontificum,and relayed by the great Italian press. Are we heading towards a return to the situation of the 70s, when the new missal of Paul VI was promulgated? With this difference that the Roman institution and the national episcopate are today infinitely weaker. 

In Dijon the priests of the diocese and the faithful who still attend the churches do not understand the policy of the archbishop, illegible for them. This is obviously what the reaction of the entire Christian people will be, with the exception of the most progressive areas: misunderstanding. Why reopen old wounds? Why advocate ecumenism ad extra,but refuse it ad intra? Why show so little mercy? 

And this in a context of dramatic reduction of Catholicism. Andrea Riccardi, main character of the Community of Sant'Egidio, who is the complete opposite of a conservative, in a recent book, where he considers the fire of Notre-Dame de Paris as a parable, deals with the announced social disappearance of the Church: La Chiesa brucia. Crise e futuro del cristianesimo (Tempi nuovi, 2021), The Church burns. Crisis and future of Christianity. He analyses country by country, in Europe, the collapse of Catholicism. In the conclusion, he of course shows an obligatory hope on the theme "the crisis is not decline", but he has previously launched, he too, launched a number of small murderous sentences: "many Catholics have gone from enthusiasm for Bergoglio to disillusionment", "the solution will not come from a reform". And then also this observation: "Traditionalism is a reality of some importance in the Church, both in the organization and in the means". 

Catholics attached to the traditional Mass are promised extermination: "We must put an end to this Mass forever!" (Cardinal Parolin); "Summorum Pontificum is practically dead!" (Bishop Roche). Traditional Catholics will experience difficult times if Roman benevolence, more or less followed by episcopal benevolence, is torn apart. But do we believe that they will let themselves be done? It may well be that, in the trial of strength that is being prepared, it is the guardians of the liturgy of the Council who have the most to lose. 

-------------------------

 * For example, Andrea Grillo: "Il peccato dell'Ecclesia Dei si chiama Summorum Pontificum", The sin of Ecclesia Dei is called Summorum Pontificum, on the Munerawebsite, http://www.cittadellaeditrice.com/munera/il-peccato-dellecclesia-dei-si-chiama-summorum-pontificum/

Paix Liturgique France

New York Jesuit blasphemes Mass and forces congregants to kneel to the Marxist rabble at Black Lives Matter.

No need for me to write much of anything on this other than this. This alleged priest is demonic and has lost the faith. If he were a true priest, he would never have defiled the Holy Sacrifice in such a manner. His order, the Jesuits, are filled with cretins such as these. They will get a severe judgement from God. If you are ever at a Mass you must stand and defy this sacrilege and blasphemy. Then, you must walk out and never return. Do not give one penny of your money to these filthy wretched devils.

For the full story, go here to Father Z!

https://wdtprs.com/2020/09/wacko-new-york-city-jesuits/

Bishop Crosby of Hamilton in Canada, banned Good Friday and Easter Vigil in defiance of Cardinal Sarah and Francis!

Douglas Crosby, OMI, is the Bishop of Hamilton in Canada, a suffrage diocese to the Metropolitan See of Toronto. Crosby was the pastor at St. Joseph's in Ottawa in 1987 from where the demonic-inspired attack to oust the fledgling Oratorian community was led. I was there at St. Brigid's. I know the history and he has a history.

In defiance of the Instruction that Pastors must celebrate (below Crosby's letter) the Triduum in their parishes with certain modifications, Crosby banned the celebration of the sacred rites on Good Friday and the Holy Saturday Easter Vigil.

Here is his order (note, computer generated signatures, not even real, but a font).

https://hamiltondiocese.com/uploads/docs/Coronavirus/2020%20Decree%20-%20Holy%20Week%20and%20the%20Celebration%20of%20the%20Paschal%20Triduum.pdf

From Cardinal Sarah:

This contrasted with the Archdiocese of Toronto and Thomas Cardinal Collins who advised all parishes that they were to implement Cardinal Sarah's Instruction. Further, he and the Cathedral Rector, Father Edward Curtis along with three others priests resident at the Bishop's "Palace" (a lovely nearly 200 year old house/rectory more than a palace and the oldest building in Toronto used for its original purpose), did the entire Triduum and live-streamed it, and singing much of it. 

Crosby's actions were disgraceful, without authority and logic and objectively speaking, grievously sinful. Nobody's health was jeopardised! Crosby and Monsignor Crotch are heretics - believing in essentially the Heresy of Assemblyism - that the assembly of people is necessary for the worship of God and the fulfilment of the liturgy. Clearly, they have no belief in the efficacy of the rites themselves.

The Diocese of Hamilton has many good priests, young, educated in Toronto at St. Philip's Seminary at the Toronto Oratory. This is where the former Bishop Tonnos sent all of his Seminarians, something Crosby ended within two years of his appointments. Those priests, perhaps twenty or so, will fix this, all in good time.

Crosby and Monsignor Crotch or evil man - malefactors. They must be called out and condemned for what they did. They cannot be defended in any way for this.

The people of Hamilton Diocese which includes Kitchener, Waterloo, Cambridge, Guelph, Brantford, Burlington, Milton, Oakville up to Owen Sound and all the bucolic country in between must and the priests at some point must rise-up and challenge these two hirelings.

Pathetic monsters they are. Wolves in sheep's clothing.

May Our Lord Jesus Christ judge them and may he deliver the people of Hamilton from such derelict "men." 

Oh, and about those two OMI "Co-Pastors" at St. Lawrence and St. Patrick, that Crosby imported from Labrador...  

Evil bishops deserve public rebuke! Hell's gates are open wide waiting for them!

How utterly tragic.

Abandoned.

All hirelings.

@BishopLubbock

@BishopLubbock

https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/us-bishop-suspends-last-rites-in-response-to-coronavirus-pandemic

Arrogant and pompouse, the Bargolian rat Sorondo proves he is one!

Oh my, this is just too good. Hats off to Diane Montagna at LifeSiteNews who no doubt used her charms (and I mean that in the most respectful and positive way) to bring out the worst in some Argentinean scumbag inappropriately ordained a priest who grew up to be a most corrupt ecclesiast and butt-kisses the global elite on behalf of a most disgraceful Argentinian bumpkin who usurped the Seat of Peter and remains on it - an un-lanced boil.

From the get-go, Montagna does not shy away from the tough questions and just does it with such humility and directness that the apostate Sorondo is flummoxed. So much so, he chooses instead to insult her - calling her "lady" and then that she is a "fanatic."

I think the best part was when Ms Montagna corrected the idiot Sorondo on Holy Scripture.  He continues on to insult Donald J. Trump for not being Catholic, Cardinal Raymond Burke for being one and then goes on to endorse sacrilege and unworthy reception of Holy Communion.

DM: I’m just thinking of the good of his soul – and for the good of her soul. St. Paul is very clear about how we can eat condemnation upon (cf 1 Cor. 1:29)…

BS: Yes, but St. Paul is very clear also to say, “my only judge is my conscience.” St. Paul said it.

DM: No, no he didn’t. He said that the Lord is his judge. He said: “Not even I can judge myself. The Lord is my judge” (cf. 1 Cor. 4:4).

BS: The Lord is my judge, but the Lord is in my conscience.

DM: The Lord isn’t necessarily if we don’t have …

BS: He’s not in the conscience of the bishop or the cardinal…

DM: But if you don’t have a well-formed conscience where divine grace is actually active, then your conscience is probably lying to you. The darkness of the intellect…

BS: This is your interpretation. Sorry, I don’t want to continue to speak with you because you are completely… and you want only to make polemics. You need to be very happy and to say to your Cardinal Burke, “Look the president [of Argentina] goes to the Mass.” This is the important fact. And your president did not go to the Mass.

DM: What do you mean, my president?

BS: Say this.

DM: My president in terms of President Trump?

BS: Yes. He does not go to the Mass.

DM: But he’s not Catholic. He’s not Catholic.

BS: Exactly! This is a great difference.

DM: He’s not Catholic. But President Trump went in January... he was the first U.S. president ever to go to the March for Life with thousands and thousands of young people.

BS: Yeah, to have the votes of the Catholics. To have the votes of the Catholics. Say this to Cardinal Burke. And in fact, I heard that Cardinal Burke is against President Trump.

DM: Is against?

BS: Yes. Yes.

DM: Or he went to see him?

BS: He is against many things that [Trump] says.

DM: Well, you don’t have to agree with everything President Trump does. But he’s saving babies. He’s saving babies.

BS: Please, lady, understand the Catholic ideas and do not be fanatic, do not be fanatic.

DM: Okay…

BS: If you continue to speak with me, do not be fanatic. Try to use reason.

DM: I am. Okay. Thank you very much.

Bergoglio has succeeded in surrounding himself with the most corrupt and vile men. This Sorondo probably takes the cake and one wonders what else.

Read the whole article and the interview. It is just so bad and so good, all at the same time.

Oh my, the rats are so exposed. 

https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/exclusive-vatican-bishop-defends-giving-communion-to-pro-abortion-argentine-president-and-mistress

Another stinking German heretic.

A long list of filthy sodomites, heretics, apostates and malcontents. 

What rotten scum.

https://www.lifesitenews.com/blogs/vp-of-german-bishops-conference-christ-became-a-human-being-not-a-man

Bishop Rick Stika does it again!

Bishop Rick Stika of Knoxville has done it again. He has again proved that he is unfit for the Office of Bishop and was probably never fit for the priesthood in the first place. The man has a serious problem. Clearly, given the amount of time he spends on Twitter, he has a poor prayer life, probably does not say his Office and verifies that Knoxville clearly doesn't need a bishop!

He has blocked me on Twitter. Heck, he's probably blocked you. What this episcopal fraud doesn't realise, the same for Ivereigh and others, is that you can't really stop anyone from reading your Tweets unless you go private. All one needs to do is open a different web browser where one is not logged in and - voila!

Or, you can just wait 'til someone shares his latest idiocy. Such as this.

And if that is not enough, there is this heresy.

With Rick and his ilk, it's always those nasty TLM people that consistently get it wrong, eh? 

Is Rick dividing Jesus? Did Our Lord Jesus Christ not say, "The Father and I are one?" If this is what Rick believes, this is heresy.  

Let us look at paragraph 20 of the Encyclical Mediator Dei by Pope Piux XII.

20. This result is, in fact, achieved when Christ lives and thrives, as it were, in the hearts of men, and when men's hearts in turn are fashioned and expanded as though by Christ. This makes it possible for the sacred temple, where the Divine Majesty receives the acceptable worship which His law prescribes, to increase and prosper day by day in this land of exile of earth. Along with the Church, therefore, her Divine Founder is present at every liturgical function: Christ is present at the august sacrifice of the altar both in the person of His minister and above all under the eucharistic species. He is present in the sacraments, infusing into them the power which makes them ready instruments of sanctification. He is present, finally, in prayer of praise and petition we direct to God, as it is written: "Where there are two or three gathered together in My Name, there am I in the midst of them."[22] The sacred liturgy is, consequently, the public worship which our Redeemer as Head of the Church renders to the Father, as well as the worship which the community of the faithful renders to its Founder, and through Him to the heavenly Father. It is, in short, the worship rendered by the Mystical Body of Christ in the entirety of its Head and members.

How about a look at the 1983 Catechism of the Catholic Church?

1325 "The Eucharist is the efficacious sign and sublime cause of that communion in the divine life and that unity of the People of God by which the Church is kept in being. It is the culmination both of God's action sanctifying the world in Christ and of the worship men offer to Christ and through him to the Father in the Holy Spirit." 

We have this from the ancient Roman Missal which follows the Pater Noster and Libera nos:

He uncovers the chalice, genuflects, takes the Host and breaking it down the middle over the chalice says: 

Per eúndem Dóminum nostrum Jesum Christum Fílium tuum, Through the same Jesus Christ, Thy Son our Lord,

He breaks off a Particle from the Host. Qui tecum vivit et regnat in unitáte Spíritus Sancti Deus, Who is God living and reigning with Thee in the unity of the Holy Ghost,

And then, of course, the Nicene Creed:

"And in the Holy Spirit, the Lord and Life-giver, who proceeds from the Father, who with the Father and Son is worshipped and glorified."

I could go on, but I've made my point.

Add yours in the combox.

Bishop Rick, Happy Thanksgiving and get off of Twitter.

More lack of charity from Rick Stika, allegedly, a Catholic bishop

As Richie Sticks as long ago blocked me from Twitter and The Facebook, please do send this to him. I'd love him to come and comment here to defend his repulsive actions as he has tried to do in the past. 

Too many hirelings, not enough Shepherds!

On this Good Shepherd Sunday.

Stika Sticks it to Sticky Catholics

Once again, Rick Stika a Bishop from Knoxville has attacked faithful Catholics on social media. He blocks with impunity after mocking and baiting. He is as far as charity as a Shepherd can be. He mocks those of us sticking to the faith and magisterium of the Church and who refuse to follow a pervert-protecting, Globalist Peronist on his path of destruction.

Now, he attacks those who follow Christ and His Church and have the temerity to hold the Vicar of Christ responsible for his heresies.

He even equates Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre with heretics and schismatics.

Well, it takes one to know one, eh Rick?

Jack Chick or Dan Brown had nothing on the realpolitik of the UnHoly Bergoglian Church

The Catholic Church is the spotless Bride of Christ. It cannot sin. It is pure.

The filthy heretic Bergoglio, has recently compared Her to being "surprised in flagrant adultery."

What an evil man. what a filthy disgrace to the papacy. What a wretch. What an apostate. An "Evil Clown" as Mundabor has labelled him. 

Now, we have this report from Crux.

“They quietly remove the bishop once the risk of exposure is extreme, give them a soft landing while a supposed investigation takes place (the results of which are never made public), then reinstate them in a top position far away from the original post, where the process likely repeats itself.  These resemble the actions of a criminal syndicate.”

Jack Chick and Dan Brown have nothing on FrancisChurch which most certainly is not, the Bride of Christ.

It is Bergoglio and his minions who are the adulterers and sodomites.

Mr. McCarrick is defrocked and Bergoglio laughs

As expected, Theodore Edgar McCarrick, a pervert, a rapist, a homosexual - a sodomite, has been reduced to the lay state and is known as "Mister" if he even deserves that. It is a move by Bergoglio on the eve of the already discredited Vatican conference to take place on abuse, a conference which will not deal with the sodomites in the priesthood, that is too little, too late.

The text from the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith is as follows:

On 11 January 2019, the Congresso of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, at the conclusion of a penal process, issued a decree finding Theodore Edgar McCarrick, archbishop emeritus of Washington, D.C., guilty of the following delicts while a cleric: solicitation in the Sacrament of Confession, and sins against the Sixth Commandment with minors and with adults, with the aggravating factor of the abuse of power. The Congresso imposed on him the penalty of dismissal from the clerical state. On 13 February 2019, the Ordinary Session (Feria IV) of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith considered the recourse he presented against this decision. Having examined the arguments in the recourse, the Ordinary Session confirmed the decree of the Congresso. This decision was notified to Theodore McCarrick on 15 February 2019. The Holy Father has recognized the definitive nature of this decision made in accord with law, rendering it a res iudicata (i.e., admitting of no further recourse).

Wise readers will know that this means little. Until every bishop and cardinal who knew and covered up is held accountable it remains too little, too late. Until there are actual criminal charges and financial consequences, it remains a joke.

A joke.

And this Peronist sits on the Seat of Peter laughing at you.

As for the conference, whilst the problem is manifested most violently in the abuse of children and youths, the fundamental problem is sodomites in the Priesthood and Episcopacy, Cardinaliate and maybe even the papacy itself. Every sodomite priest must be outed and removed from the clerical state. What if they are chaste? It does not matter, they are compromised if it is known that they have "same-sex attraction." They can be blackmailed, manipulated. They must be removed. If that means we lose 30% or 50% or more of our priests, then so be it. Drive further to Mass.

Don't think for a minute that this Argentinian Marxist thug named Jorge Mario Bergoglio takes this matter seriously. He does not, he is laughing at you. Just like these three homosexualist heresiarchs one of which this Bergoglio has now appointed as Camarlengo, one who actually lived with McCarrick and the others who were all his Protégés.

Let them laugh now. 

They won't be laughing forever.

Don't pull a cupich

If there is a more dumbass clericalist in the Church today than Blase Cupich, it would be a surprise.

Here he is pictured with his Uncle, Teddy McCarrick having just given him an award.

Oh, by the way, Bergoglio just appointed him to the shameful Synod of Bishops on Youth, this coming October.

When will the non-gay Catholic priests and seminarians of Chicago rise up and depose this filthy malefactor?

https://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=cupich

Podesta's "Catholic Spring" participant Cardinal Óscar Andrés Rodríguez Maradiaga - Did he order Pizza?

From:john.podesta@gmail.com

To: mfisher@hillaryclinton.com

Date: 2015-10-27 20:11

Subject: Fwd: Details for Nov. 2nd Discussion with Cardinal Rodriguez

---------- Forwarded message ----------

From: John Carr <John.Carr@georgetown.edu>

Date: Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 5:44 PM

Subject: Details for Nov. 2nd Discussion with Cardinal Rodriguez

To: podesta@georgetown.edu

Cc: Caitlin Devine <cmd65@georgetown.edu>, Angela Miller McGraw <

angela.miller.mcgraw@georgetown.edu>

Dear John,

I wish to thank you for your participation in the discussion with Cardinal

Rodríguez on Monday, November 2 at Georgetown Law Center Hart Auditorium. We

are delighted and honored that you will be a part of this timely and

important discussion. I am following up on your communication with Peter

Byrne. This email includes information on the program, logistics and

related matter. Here is how we have been describing the discussion:

Pope Francis' Environmental Encyclical: Protecting the Planet and the Poor

<http://berkleycenter.georgetown.edu/events/pope-francis-environmental-encyclical-protecting-the-planet-and-the-poor>

A Conversation with Cardinal Óscar Rodríguez

Monday, November 2, 4:00 to 5:30 pm

Hart Auditorium

Georgetown Law Center

*Purpose and Focus:*

Pope Francis' environmental encyclical *Laudato Si* makes a powerful moral

case for the dual obligation to care for creation and care for the poor.

Cardinal Óscar Rodríguez is a key advisor to Pope Francis, chair of his

Council of Cardinals. As the first cardinal from Honduras, he knows

firsthand the damaging human impact from environmental degradation and

leads the church’s efforts to defend the life and dignity of the poor.

*Discussants*:

Following the conversation with Cardinal Rodríguez, which will be moderated

by John Carr, director of Initiative on Catholic Social Thought and Public

Life, members of Georgetown Law Center will respond.

- Edith Brown Weiss, Francis Cabell Brown Professor of International

Law, member of United Nations Environment Programme's International

Advisory Council on Environmental Justice.

- John Podesta, Distinguished Visitor from Practice, former Counselor to

President Barack Obama on climate change and energy policy.

*Background Information*:

Cardinal Rodríguez will not be giving a formal presentation, but will be

responding to series of questions from me as moderator. I will send you

some preliminary questions I plan to raise with him on the topic. I

included a link to a video that was shot at Georgetown University featuring

Cardinal Rodríguez discussing Pope Francis' views on climate change and

environmental issues. This indicates some of the tone and content of his

likely responses and may be useful for you as you prepare your remarks.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QLVdvLPeSKA

Since it may be difficult to anticipate how best to respond to Cardinal

Rodríguez, I suggest you might focus your 10-12 minute reflection on your

response to the Encyclical

<http://w2.vatican.va/content/francesco/en/encyclicals/documents/papa-francesco_20150524_enciclica-laudato-si.pdf>.

What are its most important messages? Given your experience, what are its

potential impacts?

*Request*:

I will be introducing you and Edith Weiss. Please send me information on

what you'd like to be emphasized in a brief, relatively informal

introduction. What parts of your work, affiliations, education, family do

you wish me to lift up as I introduce you?

*Timeline*:

Here is an outline of the session:

3:45 pm – Arrive at green room adjacent to stage of Hart Auditorium to get

mic'd and go over last minute details

4:00 pm – Discussion begins in Hart Auditorium

4:05 pm – Peter Byrne, Faculty Director, Georgetown Environmental Law and

Policy Institute calls the session to order, welcomes people and

introduces topic and John Carr

4:10 pm – John Carr introduces Cardinal Rodríguez and begins a structured

conversation, asking a series of questions

4:40 pm – John Carr invites Edith Brown Weiss and John Podesta to join

Cardinal Rodríguez and him on the stage and introduces them

4:45 pm – Edith Brown Weiss gives remarks

4:57 pm – John Podesta gives remarks

5:10 pm – Questions from the audience

5:30 pm – Closing

5:35 - 6:30 – A reception begins immediately in the Hart Auditorium lobby

We encourage you to invite family, friends, colleagues, and others who

would be interested to the reception and discussion. They may RSVP here

<http://berkleycenter.georgetown.edu/events/rsvp/pope-francis-environmental-encyclical-protecting-the-planet-and-the-poor>

.

I have attached a speaker release form for photographic purposes. Please

sign and return to caitlin.devine@georgetown.edu.

Thank you for your leadership and for your participation in this important

discussion. If you have any questions or concerns please contact me by

email or on my cell 240-988-6276 or Caitlin Devine, copied here, or on her

cell 610-202-4501.

We look forward to a great discussion.

John

*John Carr*

*Director, Initiative on *

*Catholic Social Thought and Public Life*

*Georgetown University*

*202-687-1599 <202-687-1599>*

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/12370

And Francis promoted them

From @RadicalCath at Twitter. 

Cardinal Jozef De Kesel, a Danneels protege who once placed a priest credibly accused of sexually abusing a minor in charge of a parish, also promotes female ordination, 'voluntary' priestly celibacy, and wants the Church to bless homosexual unions.

Pope Francis promoted him.

Cardinal Anders Arborelius, who knew about a predatory priest for 7 years, but did nothing other than offer the victim counselling until the case went public, also proposes the creation of an advisory body of women similar to the College of Cardinals.

Pope Francis promoted him.

Cardinal Gérald Cyprien Lacroix was accused of ignoring a decades-long case of child sex abuse perpetrated by a member of his own Pius X Secular Institute (no affiliation to the SSPX) for years. He defended Amoris Laetitia as a "beautiful" document.

Pope Francis promoted him.

Cardinal Luis Ferrer, currently head of the Congregation of the Doctrine of the Faith, was recently summoned to appear in criminal court in France for allegedly being informed of a priest's confirmed past abuses and not reporting them to authorities.

Pope Francis promoted him.

Cardinal Giovanni Becciu, Deputy Emeritus of the Secretariat of State, suspended an external audit of the Vatican's finances upon learning that the auditor-general, Libero Milone, had begun to uncover potentially incriminating fiscal irregularities.

Pope Francis promoted him.

Cardinal Jean Zerbo, along with two other bishops from Mali, hid a total of $13.5 million dollars in undisclosed Swiss bank accounts, which then mysteriously "evaporated". The purpose of the accounts and the fate of the money remains unclear.

Pope Francis promoted him.

More sociopathic abuse from the mouth of Bergoglio - attack those who expose the perpetrators as if they are the Devil

In his homily at the morning Mass today in the chapel of the Casa Santa Marta, luxury abode of Bergoglio, he said:

“In these times, it seems like the 'Great Accuser' has been unchained and is attacking bishops. True, we are all sinners, we bishops. He tries to uncover the sins, so they are visible in order to scandalize the people."

It was St. Gregory the Great who said;

"It is better for scandal to arise than the truth to be suppressed."

It should not be too hard to decide who is correct and who is a liar a deceiver and a fraud.

Does this malefactor masquerading as the Vicar of Christ on Earth have any feelings for the victims or the sufferings of faithful Catholics now? With this kind of attitude, can Bergoglio not be an abuser himself? Does he really expect us to believe anything he might say to defend against the Viganò Testimony? He only confirms more and more on a daily basis how right Viganò was and how corrupt the rest really are.

What more does this puss filled boil on the seat of Peter have to do to convince all that he is a sociopath in his treatment of the poor faithful, and as far as Carlo Maria Viganò, goes, an actual psychopath.

This malefactor, this pompous arrogant monster Bergoglio would rather keep secret the corruption and filth of the bishops. These are not private sins, these are public sins. This is not a case where of a few men with same-sex attraction fell, these are actions which are demonic, satanic, we are in Black Mass territory. 

Bishops, Cardinals, you faithful to Our Lord Jesus Christ, how long will you silent whilst this filthy arrogant man continues to scandalise and insult the faithful. You sit there in fear of this man, yet; you have no love for the sheep and no fear of God.

You will be damned to Hell with Bergoglio.

You will deserve it for abandoning us.

"There is a sexual nature to the Eucharist," - Thomas J. Rosica of the Congregation of St. Basil

From the cleric who said that no family was as "irregular" as The Holy Family.

From the Basilian who praised the now dead and decaying homoerotic-heretic apostate Gregory Baum who after he left the priesthood to marry a former nun but before and after engaged in sodomy said; "you remain a faithful, deeply devoted Catholic; you love Jesus, the Church, the Eucharist". (that must have come as a big surprise to homoerotic-heretic Baum).

From the intimate of the Argentinian pervert protector, Bergoglio who said that "Pope Francis breaks Catholic traditions whenever he wants because he is “free from disordered attachments.” Our Church has indeed entered a new phase: with the advent of this first Jesuit pope, it is openly ruled by an individual rather than by the authority of Scripture alone or even its own dictates of tradition plus Scripture."\

Comes this.

"THERE IS SEXUAL NATURE TO THE EUCHARIST"

Blase Cupich - If you don't like Pope Francis, you're a racist

At 1:08 of the video at this link, Blase Cupich says, "Quite frankly, they also don't like him because he is a Latino."

Stupid moronic idiot.

His blood is Italian.

And racism has nothing to do with the issues of Pope Francis!

https://www.nbcchicago.com/news/local/cardinal-cupich-pope-bigger-agenda_Chicago-491855581.html