The Bishops who remained and continues to remain silent about McCarrick are complicit in a crime

The New York Times has reported on the disgraceful coverup of the homosexual predator Cardinal, Timothy McCarrick. There is no need to write more here of that filthy monster, the label name at the bottom can take the reader to the history which I have written about this pathetic man. From his long known homosexual predator life to his illegal lobbying for the election of Bergoglio, it is legion.

In the Times article; "He Preyed on Men Who Wanted to Be Priests, Then He Became a Cardinal," the times reveals one of the seminarians who this pervert McCarrick went after. 

As a young man studying to be a priest in the 1980s, Robert Ciolek was flattered when his brilliant, charismatic bishop in Metuchen, N.J., Theodore E. McCarrick, told him he was a shining star, cut out to study in Rome and rise high in the church.
 Bishop McCarrick began inviting him on overnight trips, sometimes alone and sometimes with other young men training to be priests. There, the bishop would often assign Mr. Ciolek to share his room, which had only one bed. The two men would sometimes say night prayers together, before Bishop McCarrick would make a request — “come over here and rub my shoulders a little”— that extended into unwanted touching in bed.

Matt C. Abbott wrote years ago about the pervert sodomite predator Cardinal and later took the column down. I read it archived a number of years ago. Now, Abbott has named the man who was the reason he hid the column originally. Former priest Bart Aslin wrote to Matt and provided a full disclosure of his history. 

To my readers in here Toronto, don't think this Archdiocese is so holy, so clean, so moral. I can assure you that the filth and homosexual penetration of St. Augustine's Seminary in past decades is legendary. What I know about the filth in Toronto would fill a book. I do not report it in order to protect those whom I know that were victims and others who have confided in me, the truth of the sordid history here from the era of Philip Pocock, Emmett Carter and Aloysius Ambrozic. 

Returning to McCarrick, every American bishop must be suspect of the cover up. They knew, all or most of them knew and did nothing, said nothing. Men who are now bishops and cardinals covered it up, think about that.

Think not that Bergoglio is unaware. Bergoglio is the most complicit, he has failed to clean out the filth from the stables and in fact, has pushed the agenda of the homosexualists and done their bidding.

May God free us soon from this perverted juggernaut.

Bergoglio's work is summed up as an "Obliteration of the Sacraments"

There is so much to write on, so much to report on. As usual, this is my most demanding time of year professionally speaking, so blogging is going to be light. Even so, I do hope you will continue to come by, at least to get access to many of the best Catholic bloggers in the English speaking world all linked at the left. I will have less of an opportunity to write original posts, but I will try to post articles of interest and importance. Personally, I do enjoy all of your comments and the debate in the comment box, so do please keep it going.

Recently, Sandro Magister wrote and included this article from "Catholica."

http://magister.blogautore.espresso.repubblica.it/2018/07/09/a-monk-and-theologian-breaks-the-silence-on-the-churchs-metamorphosis/

“AMORIS LAETITIA” AND THE OBLITERATION OF THE SACRAMENTS

by Giulio Meiattini, OSB

(passages selected from the interview in “Catholica” no. 140)

NOT DISCERNMENT, BUT CUNNING

The situation of confusion is evident. Naturally, there are those who deny that this is a matter of confusion, maintaining that this is the positive result of a style of ecclesial governance aimed at “initiating processes rather than possessing spaces” (cf. “Evangelii Gaudium” 223). Therefore, the first discernment to be made would be precisely on the nature of this situation: can confusion, disagreement among bishops on sensitive doctrinal points, be fruits of the Spirit? To me it seems not. To discern also means understanding if it is appropriate or not to initiate processes in certain fields, and also with what timing, modalities, and objectives.

Let us observe, for example, the manner in which the new discipline for the “divorced and remarried” was reached.

After Cardinal Kasper’s talk at the consistory had prepared the terrain so to speak, the two synods, with an intermediate year of heated discussions, were unable to give rise to a common approach on the problem discussed. Those who read the accounts of the “circuli minores” of the 2015 synod realize very well that on the point in question there was not a shared perspective.

But one thing is clear: that a large majority of the fathers had not developed the conviction to change the traditional discipline. So much so that the authors of the “Relatio finalis,” on the controversial point, took care not to introduce innovations.

But - here is another small step - they drafted formulas of an indefinite tone that, while not providing for access to the sacraments, changed the atmosphere so to speak. Thus the “non-opposition” to those hesitant formulas (which had trouble getting two thirds of the votes) was enough to allow another subsequent small step: a couple of ambiguous little footnotes in “Amoris Laetitia,” which do not affirm or deny but hint at a certain direction.

This further passage smashed the interpretive boundaries, until in the autumn of 2017 - another step - there came the pope’s official approval of the “Criteria” of the bishops of the region of Buenos Aires on chapter VIII of “Amoris Laetitia.”

But these criteria, if one is honest, are not a simple interpretation of “Amoris Laetitia.” They add and say things that are not to be found in “Amoris Laetitia” and that, above all, had never been approved at the synods and never would have been. […]

Thus, through small successive steps, over the course of three years a very large one was made and the discipline was slowly changed, but certainly not in a synodal manner, in my view.

I may be wrong, but this “modus operandi” is not discernment, but rather cunning. In place of reasonable and open debate (the famous “dubia” have never received a response!), the strategy of persuasion and of the fait accompli took hold.

FAITH REDUCED TO ETHICS

Among the ethical demands and the sacramental foundation of Christian existence, the center is undoubtedly the sacrament, which is the communication to the believer of the grace that saves, and, in that it is welcomed by and transforms man, is also an act of glorification, doxology. […] Ethics is neither the first word not the last.

In “Amoris Laetitia,” however, the opposite logic is followed: the starting points are categories taken from the natural law and principles of general ethics (attenuating factors, the relationship between universal norm and subjective situation, non-imputability, etc.), and from these major premises are drawn the consequences for the pastoral practice of the sacraments.

In this way, the dimension of the symbolic and the sacramental, which should anchor, embrace, and transcend the moral sphere, loses its significance and becomes a mere appendix to ethics. […] The demonstration is given by the fact that in concrete terms the sin of adultery loses its public significance linked to the testimonial aspect of the sacrament, and can be remitted in the “internal forum” without any need to explain before the community why a spouse who publicly contradicts the sacramental sign of fidelity should publicly receive the Eucharist.

In short, the result of the decisions of “Amoris Laetitia” is the reduction of the sacramental to the moral, meaning of faith to ethics, which to me does not seem to be a mere question of pastoral practice. What is at stake here is something essential to the nature of Christianity.

A “TREMENDOUS BURDEN”?

I sincerely do not understand how a bishop, above all that of Rome, could write phrases of this kind: “There is no need to lay upon two limited persons the tremendous burden of having to reproduce perfectly the union existing between Christ and his Church” (“Amoris Laetitia” 122).

Here is the glaring exemplification of what I stated before in a general way: if the evangelical ethic is isolated from the sacrament and reduced to a general norm it becomes “a tremendous burden,” like the Mosaic law, instead of “an easy yoke and a light burden.” Whatever happened, in this perspective, to the transformative effect of the sacrament? […] So then we could ask ourselves whether the encouragement of bearing witness to faith in Christ to the point of bloodshed is not an even more tremendous burden, not to be placed on the shoulders of the people. […]

One arrives at this point only if one is accustomed to conceiving of Christianity - perhaps without fully realizing it - as ethics.

“SIMUL IUSTUS ET PECCATOR”

“Amoris Laetitia” goes so far as to say that even if according to outward appearances one is living in a condition of objective sin, on account of attenuating factors one could be in the state of grace and even “grow in the life of grace” (no. 305).

It is clear that if this is the way things are, the interruption between sacrament and moral action, as already highlighted, leads to outcomes that overlap with the Lutheran conception of “simul iustus et peccator,” condemned by the Council of Trent. […] In this way, one could be at the same time just (before God, invisibly) and a sinner (before the Church, visibly). Works are at risk of having no more significance in the “discernment” of grace.

CATHOLIC COMMUNION EVEN FOR A BUDDHIST?

The direction that is taking shape around intercommunion between Catholics and Protestants obeys the same logic: it is not symbolic realism that determines the decision, but the simple evaluation of the presumed interior condition: if a Protestant is presumably in the state of grace (based on the attenuating factors of invincible ignorance, diminished responsibility, an honest way of life, etc.), why could he not receive the Catholic Eucharist? Perhaps one does not realize that posing the question this way could lead to making the same argument for a Buddhist or a Hindu who lives a good and just life. Tampering with the relationship between morality and the sacraments ultimately can lead to ecclesiological conceptions that are not Catholic.

(English translation by Matthew Sherry, Ballwin, Missouri, U.S.A.)

Calling out an adulterer means you need your medication!

Ontario's radical sex-education has been trampled under foot

This is Benjamin Levin. You can read all about him here. Benny was the Assistant Deputy Minister of Education for the Province of Ontario under the then "Catholic" Premier, Dalton McGuinty. Levin was responsible for developing a radical sex-education program that was abhorrent to many parents for its explicitness. The McGuinty government, in face of tremendous pressure and backlash, pulled the curriculum. Not long after, Levin was arrested and later convicted of various charges relating to child-pornography. Though his daughters denied it, Levin claimed to have had committed incestuous acts with them. After his release from prison, only three years, his "depraved world" continued. 

This is Kathleen Wynne (in blue). She is a lesbian and former Premier of Ontario defeated, no; politically obliterated this past June by the good people of Ontario. Much to the horror of her children, Kathleen kicked her husband out of the marriage bed for her lesbian lover, Jane who is pictured in the grey and white at left. Wynne has damn near bankrupted this Province. Jobs have left. Electricity prices are the highest in North America and Ontario is the largest debtor sub-sovereign state in the entire world. Whilst Premier, Wynne implemented the radical sex education agenda of the convicted child-porn aficionado, Benjamin Levin.  

This is the feminist Justin "Groper" Trudeau sitting between the two of them at a gay pride parade.

This is Tanya Granic-Allen. 

Tanya is a Catholic wife and mother who led a multi-year campaign for an organization called Parents Are First Educators against the radical agenda of Levin/Wynne. Tanya ran for the leadership of the Ontario Conservative Party and raised this issue to the top of the agenda. She crowned the new leader Doug Ford, by taking her votes to him. She attempted to run in the election but was removed by Doug because of certain comments made years ago. She may not agree, you may not; but I believe Doug Ford did the right thing and saved her and her family, her children, from an all-out assault that would have even included death threats by a whacked out radical Left not unlike what Americans are now seeing. Tanya Granic-Allen will do more good as a lobbyist than just another Member of the Legislature. She already has. She is a heroine. A lioness.

And this is Douglas Ford, the Premier of Ontario. 

Doug won the election and promised Tanya and Ontarians that he would take action. 

Today, Doug Ford, through his Minister of Education took that perverted radical sex-education program developed by the convicted child pornographer Benjamin Levin and implemented by the lesbian Wynne and threw it on the trash heap.

Doug Ford, like Donald Trump, has put the people first.

Promises made.

Promises kept. 

Calling out the globalist conspiracy of liberal fascist thugs!

Not a day goes by when I don't find myself liking this man more and more. What a man. What a leader.

They are all afraid of him because he is with the people.

Their rotten little fascist, globalist, Christ-hating game is being called out and exposed for the rot and filth and finanical scam that it is.

God bless Donald John Trump.

God bless the United States of America!

Beware of False Prophets

The Gospel for today, the Seventh Sunday After Pentecost according to the only Latin Rite that matters is taken from the Book of St. Matthew, 7:15-21.

"Beware of false prophets, who come to you in the clothing of sheep, but inwardly they are ravening wolves. By their fruits you shall know them. Do men gather grapes of thorns, or figs of thistles? Even so every good tree bringeth forth good fruit, and the evil tree bringeth forth evil fruit. A good tree cannot bring forth evil fruit, neither can an evil tree bring forth good fruit. Every tree that bringeth not forth good fruit, shall be cut down, and shall be cast into the fire. Wherefore by their fruits you shall know them. Not every one that saith to me, Lord, Lord, shall enter into the kingdom of heaven: but he that doth the will of my Father who is in heaven, he shall enter into the kingdom of heaven."

Be wary friend, there are many false prophets dressed up as priests and bishops. They are liars, they hate Christ and they hate you.

No faithful priest or bishop can hide the homosexual clergy mafia any longer!

Out.

Them.

All!

Tell me, Fathers; how is it possible for you to go about your priestly life to serve Christ and His people, his Church and tolerate this filth? How many of you know with conclusive proof that the pastor in the next parish or the auxiliary bishop not only has the "objective disorder" of same-sex attraction but is "objectively disordered" because he acts out on them? How do you sit there and do nothing? What are you afraid of?

A failing parish? A suspension? Mocked?

Do you know what I've noticed?

Since I have ramped up the discussion about the homosexual mafia in the Church, how it must be outed and how no homosexual is fit for the priesthood, I have, as Steve Skojec states below, been ostracised. Certain priests want nothing more to do with me. I guess it is true, for some, it was "all lace and no grace."

Their loss, now and forever.

What did Rocco Palmo know about pervert McCarrick and when did he know it?

Rocco Palmo, who has blocked me on Twitter, publishes the gossipy insider Lispers in the Loggia blog.

Since 2002, at least, it has been known that McCarrick was a diabolical narcist, homosexual predator and fraud. 

With all of Palmo's contacts and his access to the AmChurch Power Brokers, what did Palmo know about it and when did he know it?

George Neumayr‏ @george_neumayr

George Neumayr Retweeted

This deepens Wuerl's complicity in the McCarrick scandal. Wuerl put out an extremely vague statement denying any "charges" during McCarrick's time in DC. Yet this report says the harassment settlements were reached when he was in DC. Wuerl did zip to warn seminary houses, etc https://twitter.com/roccopalmo/status/1011379309137756160 …

Francis accuses Middle Eastern priests of living la vida loca

Bishop of Rome Bergoglio has chastised the suffering priests of the Middle East. Being of Maronite ancestry myself, I found his remarks insulting, repugnant and hypocritical.

Bergoglio said that they live in luxury.

http://www.catholicherald.co.uk/news/2018/06/25/pope-francis-clergy-in-the-middle-east-should-not-be-living-in-luxury/

"There are perhaps - not many -some priest, bishop, a religious congregation who profess poverty yet lives like a rich person."

Like this?

Bergoglio Bedroom at Motel St. Martha

Lobby at Pope's Apartment

Antonio Spadaro, EssJay and his special friend, "Cardinal" Tagle having fun in poverty

Slumming in Rome, thinking about the luxury rectories in the Middle East

Who is behind the persecution of Father Frank Phillips and the Canons Regular of St. John Cantius?

As my dear readers may recall, Father Frank Phillips, Pastor of St. John Cantius Parish in Chicago was removed from active ministry by Blaise Cupich, the Cardinal Archbishop pending an investigation into accusations. 

That investigation is complete and Father Phillips has been exonerated. Yet, Cupich has prohibited him from public ministry.

Oakes Spalding of Mahound's Paradise is a parishioner there and has a unique insight. His past columns can be read at this link:

https://mahoundsparadise.blogspot.com/search/label/st.%20john%20cantius

Oakes writes of the enemies of Father Phillips and the broader war against him and the Canons Regular. He intends to name, names.

Good.

Out them all, Oakes.

https://mahoundsparadise.blogspot.com/2018/06/breaking-fr-phillips-permanently-out-at.html

United States Catholic Bishops are complicit in human smuggling

Follow the money.

There is a reason that the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops is so eager to see open borders. The sodomites hidden away are complicit in a vast smuggling operation, human trafficking, in order to provide a steady supply of child sex slaves. In addition to sex slaves, wages of low-income Americans, mostly Black, continue to be depressed. Hollywood celebrities desire cheap service and a steady supply of sex slaves.

Catholics in America must withhold every single dollar from the collection plate and special collections. You must educate yourselves into the real corruption in the Deep State which includes the Catholic bishops. This is not the Church of Christ. Make no mistake about that.

Out the bastards.

Be like him!

The People Smuggling Industry By: Bill O'ReillyJune 21, 2018

Archive Comment Email Print Share

It is quite apparent that the national press in America is no longer concerned with finding the truth about important matters.  Ideology and the crass pursuit of profits have pretty much destroyed honest journalism in this country. A vivid example is the chaos surrounding the southern border.  Millions of foreign born people have illegally crossed from Mexico and congress still cannot come up with policies that might stem that tide.  The truth about what is happening down there is horrifying but largely unreported. Smuggling human beings into the USA is now an enormous criminal enterprise that operates openly in Central America and Mexico.  The process begins with the “vaquetones,” usually young men who scour poor neighborhoods for desperate people who want to live in America.  The vaquetones (translation: the brazen) direct the migrants to the actual smugglers called coyotes, a term invented in the 19th century to describe Mexicans who provided laborers to the Southwestern United States. Read the rest at  https://www.billoreilly.com/b/The-People-Smuggling-Industry/880073800259692626.html

Monsignor Carlo Pervert Capella found guilty of trafficking in child pornography

Child porn pervert Msgr. Carlo Capella has been fined and sentenced to five years in jail. Capella, pictured below, bearded; was a Vatican diplomat who accessed and traded in child pornography while in Washington and on a trip to Windsor, Ontario.

Defrocking the fraudulent priest and then castrating the pervert should be the next step.

Every sodomite must be found out and driven out of the priesthood and episcopacy.

Enough!

VATICAN CITY — A Vatican court found Msgr. Carlo Alberto Capella, a former staff member at the Vatican nunciature in Washington, guilty of possessing and distributing child pornography.

Judge Giuseppe Della Torre, head of the tribunal of the Vatican City State, delivered the verdict June 23, and sentenced Msgr. Capella to five years in prison and fined him 5,000 euro ($5,833).

The Vatican press office said he would serve his sentence in a Vatican cell located in the building of the Gendarme Corps of Vatican City State, as the Vatican police force is formally known.

It is presumed to be the same cell prepared for Paolo Gabriele, the former papal butler who leaked reserved papal correspondence in 2012, and Msgr. Lucio Vallejo Balda, former secretary of the Prefecture for the Economic Affairs of the Holy See, who was found guilty of leaking confidential documents about the Vatican's financial reform in 2016.

Both Gabriele and Vallejo Balda were pardoned after serving a few months of their sentences.

Msgr. Capella was accused of having and exchanging with others "a large quantity" of child pornography; the quantity is such that the charges are considered "aggravated" by the Vatican City court.

Prior to verdict, the judges presiding over the case listened to Vatican prosecutor Roberto Zanotti who recommended the court sentence the Italian prelate to five years and nine months and fine him 10,000 euro ($11,668).

Roberto Borgogno, Msgr. Capella's lawyer, pleaded with the court to give the monsignor a reduced sentence and referred to his client's crimes as "a problem" that required intense therapy and not a heavy sentence.

Before adjourning in the morning, Msgr. Capella addressed the court, saying that the "mistakes I have made are evident as well as this period of weakness. I am sorry that my weakness has hurt the church, the Holy See and my diocese. I also hurt my family and I am repentant."

Referring to his possession and distribution of child pornography as "a bump in the road in my priestly life," the former Vatican diplomat said that he wants to continue receiving "psychological support."

The Vatican press office said a decision regarding Msgr. Capella by the Congregation of the Doctrine of Faith would be made at a later date. The congregation's investigations of clerical sexual abuse cases is separate from how those cases are handled by criminal courts.

The U.S. State Department notified the Holy See Aug. 21 of Msgr. Capella's possible violation of laws relating to child pornography images. The 50-year-old Italian monsignor had been working in Washington just over a year when he was recalled to the Vatican.

On Sept. 28, police in Canada issued a nationwide arrest warrant for Msgr. Capella on charges of accessing, possessing and distributing child pornography. 

Is Pervert Uncle Teddy McCarrick one of Bella Dodd's grandchildren?

Bella Dodd, baptised Maria Assunta Isabella Visono, was an Italian immigrant to the United States of America. She was a brilliant woman who attended university in the early 1920's and became transfixed with Bolshevism as did many of her generations at the time. She joined the American Communist Party and rose within its ranks.

After a reversion to the faith in 1950 with the aid of Fulton Sheen, Dodd testified before the United States Senate, in talks and in her book School of Darkness, that the Communist Party was infiltrating all ranks of American society, in fact, this infiltration happened here in Canada and throughout Europe. After all. were we not told in 1917 that "Russia would spread its evils?"

Dodd also testified that she was personally responsible for placing over one thousand men into Catholic seminaries, men who had no faith, -- atheists, communists, homosexuals, all to become priests and later bishops and cardinals whose mission was the destruction of the Catholic faith. It would not have been a hard sell, These men would have been promised an easy life, respect and prestige, a place to live, free food, security and all the sex with concubines and other communists agents they could want and for those who were so inclined, access to young boys.

Many of these were ordained and became pastors, seminary rectors, vocation directors, bishops and cardinals. Dodd did this work in the 1930's and into the middle 1940's. Those who became rectors and seminary professors and vocation directors and bishops then brought in the next generation, more atheists, communists and especially, the homosexuals.

Theodore McCarrick was ordained in 1958, I was two years old. A decade later, a young boy about my age was experiencing a priest fondling and masturbating him one Christmas before Mass in the sacristy of St. Patrick's Cathedral in New York. That priest was McCarrick. It could have been me, it could have been you, it could have been any one of us.

McCarrick's perversion was well known. Those out there who are his "nephews" must out him, those who protected him must be exposed.

Was McCarrick really a priest? Was he a bishop? Were the Masses he offered valid, the Confessions?

Was McCarrick recruited by one of Bella Dodd's "nephews?" If they did not have the necessary intent were their ordinations and all that flowed from them, valid?

Have millions of Catholics been denied the Sacraments because there is no grace due to a defect in the Sacrament of Ordination, and later, episcopal consecration? Are thousands of priests today, well-meaning and sincere, only really laymen because the bishop who laid hands on them no more a bishop than I?

These filthy frauds must be outed. If that means that the physical Church and its property must collapse, then so be it. Holy Mass in my dining room will have more to offer than all the sacrileges in Cathedrals.

It is time to face up to the reality.

Bergoglio dissolves the Catholic Church

In a stunning statement on the journey back from Switzerland, Bergoglio of Rome said that the decision on eucharistic communion for protestants should be made by the local bishop.

Bergoglio has declared himself an apostate. 

Cardinals, Bishops, call now an imperfect synod or council and denounce this enemy of the faith, this enemy of Christ.

https://cnstopstories.com/2018/06/21/pope-individual-bishops-must-decide-about-communion-in-mixed-marriages/

Is Francis a liar? Says he was never told about the dubia

In a stunning interview, Jorge Bergoglio denies any knowledge of the Dubia of Four Cardinals on the heretical realities present in his Apostolic Exhortation, Amoris Laetitia.

Not only does the state that he found out about it "only from the newspapers," but he mocks the Cardinals stating, "a way of doing things that is, let's say, not ecclesial but we all make mistakes."

That very statement is as preposterous as it is deceptive. The dubia is exactly how the matter should e addressed.

https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/breaking-cardinal-burke-responds-to-francis-we-hand-delivered-dubia-letter

Make no mistake, Bergoglio is not ignorant of ecclesiastical norms or canon law, he knows full well what is required. Do not believe for a moment that he is simply demented. The fact is he is evil and a fraud.  

He stumbled and nearly fell in Switzerland today. 

https://onepeterfive.com/burke-cardinal-caffarra-personally-delivered-dubia-letter-to-papal-residence/

Theodore Cardinal McCarrick - Bergoglio's Lobbyist Confirmed as a Pervert and Sexual Predator

“He put his arms around me and wrapped his legs around mine. Then He started to tell me what a nice young man I was and what a good priest I would make someday. He also told me about the hard work and stress he was facing in his new role as Archbishop of Newark. He told me how everyone knows him and how powerful he was. The Archbishop kept saying, “Pray for your poor uncle.” All of a sudden, I felt paralyzed. I didn’t have my own car and there was nowhere to go. The Archbishop started to kiss me and move his hands and legs around me. I remained frozen, curled up like a ball. I felt his penis inside his underwear leaning against my buttocks as he was rubbing my legs up and down. His hands were moving up and down my chest and back, while tightening his legs around mine. I tried to scream but could not…I was paralyzed with fear. As he continued touching me, I felt more afraid. He even tried several times to force his hands under my shorts. He tried to roll me over so that he could get on top of me, but I resisted, I felt sick and disgusted and finally was able to jump out of bed. I went into the bathroom where I vomited several times and started to cry. After twenty minutes in the bathroom, the Archbishop told me to come back to bed. Instead I went to the recliner and pretended to fall asleep.” Source

Theodore Cardinal McCarrick, a former priest of the Archdiocese of New York and Archbishop Emeritus of Washington D.C., has been confirmed to be a sexual predator.

In a statement released by New York Cardinal Timothy Dolan, in whose diocese, James Martin, S.J., continues his advancing of the homosexualist cause, stated that McCarrick a former priest of New York, "is no longer to exercise publicly his priestly ministry." A review board found certain allegations of predatory sexual abuse, “credible and substantiated.”  At the direction of Jorge Bergoglio, who was put on the Seat of Peter by much lobbying by McCarrick after being approached by “a powerful and influential Roman,”  the Vatican Secretary of State, Cardinal Pietro Parolin, has instructed Cardinal McCarrick that he is no longer to exercise publicly his priestly ministry.”

The Diocese of Metuchen, where McCarrick served as bishop in the 1980’s has no record of McCarrick having abused minors, however, there had been multiple incidents with adults. The diocese has issued a statement by Bishop Checchio stating that "In the past, there have been allegations that he engaged in sexual behaviour with adults. This Diocese and the Archdiocese of Newark received three allegations of sexual misconduct with adults decades ago; two of these allegations resulted in settlements."

Cardinal Archbishop Joseph Tobin, the Archbishop of Newark, known to be actively sympathetic to the homosexualist cause, acknowledged that there had been allegations of incidents with adults in the other dioceses.

McCarrick himself has stated, "While I have absolutely no recollection of this reported abuse, and believe in my innocence, I am sorry for the pain the person who brought the charges has gone through, as well as for the scandal such charges cause our people.” 

In the lead up to the conclave that elected Jorge Bergoglio, McCarrick engaged in lobbying for the election of Bergoglio which when combined with what is already known about the election of the Argentine, invalidated the election and resulted in the automatic excommunication of McCarrick and Bergoglio. McCarrick discloses his evil machinations on a video of a talk given a Villanova University, home of modernist “theologian” Massimo “Beans” Faggioli, who claims his name means, “noble fagus (tree)”

Even the secular media knew of the connection between McCarrick and Bergoglio:

As this writer has reported in the past, in a recorded address at Villanova University, McCarrick stated: 

Just before we went into the general conversations when everybody can talk, a very interesting and influential Italian gentleman came to ask if he could come and see me, so I said “sure.” He came to see me at the Seminary, at the American College where I was staying; and we sat down. He is a very brilliant man, a very influential man in Rome and we talked about a number of things. He had a favour to ask me when I get back to the United States, but then he asked, “What about Bergoglio?” I was surprised at the question, I said, “what about him.” He said, “Does he have a chance?” I said, “I don’t think so, because no one has mentioned his name, he hasn’t been in anybody’s mind, I don’t think it’s on anybody’s mind to vote for him.” He said, “He could do it you know.” I said, “What could he do?” He said, “He could reform the Church, if we gave him five years, he could put us back on target. “ “Well, he’s 76.” “Yeah, in five years, if he had five years. The Lord working through Bergoglio in five years could make the Church over again.” I said, “That’s an interesting thing.” “I know you’re his friend.” “Well, I hope I’m his friend.” He said, “Talk him up.” That was the first that I heard from people that Bergoglio would be a possibility in this election.

This blog has reported on McCarricks’ machinations previously.

http://www.awrsipe.com/Comments/2008-04-21-McCarrick_Syndrome.html

We have also reported on important articles by Matt C. Abbott and Richard Sipe showing that the repugnant perverted behaviours of this filthy sodomite were long known.

http://www.awrsipe.com/Comments/2008-04-21-McCarrick_Syndrome.html

http://www.bishop-accountability.org/news2006/03_04/2005_12_02_Abbott_PriestAccuses.htm

http://www.theamericanconservative.com/dreher/church-cardinal-mccarrick-is-a-molester/

How many more? 

Who else?

Expose them all.

"They knew and they let it happen, it could have been you, it could have been me, it could have been any of us."

Bergoglio's perverts have seized control of the Youth Synod

We knew this would happen, that the ridiculous idea of a Synod for kids would be taken over by a cabal of sodomites and other virtue-signalling perverts.

The proof is now here for all to see.

Never before in a Church document has the language "LGBT" been used.

Bergoglio is a stinking buffoon.

Enemies of Christ, all of them.

To Hell with all of them.