“A time is coming when men will go mad, and when they see someone who is not mad, they will attack him, saying, 'You are mad; you are not like us.” ― St. Antony the Great
Monday 4 July 2016
The Canadian Catholic Collapse
Labels:
Michael Voris,
Woe Canada
Sunday 3 July 2016
Catholics who leave "gays" in their sin are no different than the Mohammedan, Omar Mateen
If you do not know who Joseph Sciambra is, you will after reading this.
Perhaps the Bishop of Rome should ask Joseph what he thinks about apologies to "gays".
But first, Pope Bergoglio should apologise for calling them "gay" and affirming them in their sin.
Mohammedans, such as the terrorist in Orlando, want to send "gays" to Hell.
Catholics want to save them from it. Catholics who preach the truth, that is.
Those who do not, those who are closet sodomites in clerical garb, those who want to meet them where they are and affirm them there, are no different than that pathetic Mohammedan, Omar Mateen.
If Bergoglio, Marx, Cupich, clergy such as James Martin, S.J., Edward L. Beck and others wish to leave these men where they are, they are also terrorists and they will burn in Hell right along with them.
Joseph Sciambra is not one of these men.
He is, no doubt, hers!
Perhaps the Bishop of Rome should ask Joseph what he thinks about apologies to "gays".
But first, Pope Bergoglio should apologise for calling them "gay" and affirming them in their sin.
Mohammedans, such as the terrorist in Orlando, want to send "gays" to Hell.
Catholics want to save them from it. Catholics who preach the truth, that is.
Those who do not, those who are closet sodomites in clerical garb, those who want to meet them where they are and affirm them there, are no different than that pathetic Mohammedan, Omar Mateen.
If Bergoglio, Marx, Cupich, clergy such as James Martin, S.J., Edward L. Beck and others wish to leave these men where they are, they are also terrorists and they will burn in Hell right along with them.
Joseph Sciambra is not one of these men.
He is, no doubt, hers!
Should the Catholic Church apologize to gays?
When I was a conflicted and scared boy growing
up within the confusing confines of the post-Conciliar Church of the 1970s, I
needed someone, anyone, to teach me and to tell me that Jesus wanted to be more
than just my friend, that He wanted to be my Savior – that He wanted to save me
from myself. I knew, even from a young age, that something was going incredibly
wrong within me – I was terrified and I needed help. However, the Jesus they
offered was a mere historical figure; a guy who meant well, but who was dead
and distant; he was the hippie-Christ from “Godspell” in a Superman shirt –
with the Bible as a superhero comic-strip.
When I was teenager, quickly swerving towards
homosexuality, a few noticed, but did nothing to help. At school, a sort of
pandemic relativism was extolled as an individual rule of life: custom-made for
every human person on earth. The detached Jesus from my youth cared little
about our daily drudgery or our personal proclivities.
On the verge of accepting my homosexuality, I
was told by a Catholic priest that I needn’t worry as every homosexual is born
gay; he sent me on my way with a socially responsible warning about the dangers
of unsafe sex.
Pope Francis to move forward against the will of "ultra-conservative" but promises not to follow the pattern of Mohammed
When people use the words "ultra-conservative" or "radical traditionalist" to describe faithful Catholics they actually reveal themselves for what are:
Dissenters.
Dissenters.
Modernists.
Heretics.
Take this writer for example, I follow the Catholic faith which I was taught by my mother and father. Growing up in the 1960's I was taught the faith in school by good Catholic Sisters of St. Joseph and faithful priests. That faith, is what I continue to practice.
Yet, it is that faith that these dissenters, modernists and heretics condemn as "ultra-conservative" and other such insults and epithets.
According to Inés San Martín , Pope Francis has vowed in a
new interview that he won’t be slowed down by resistance from
“ultra-conservatives” in the Church who “say no to everything,” insisting, “I’m
going ahead without looking over my shoulder.”
The pontiff also suggested he has no intention of launching
a crackdown on the opposition, saying, “I don’t cut off heads. That was never
my style. I’ve never liked doing that.”
Thank you, Pope Bergoglio, for not following the paths of the Mohammedan
practice.
Severed skulls of the Saint Antonio Primaldi and Companions of Otranto |
Labels:
Crux,
Pope Francis
I am sorry to "Gays"
I am sorry to all "gays."
I am sorry that Pope Francis said the words "who am I too judge" and because he did not understand that the media would leave out the first part and only concentrate on the second. I am sorry that this made you think that it is okay to continue on in a life choice that will result in your spending an eternity cut off from God, in Hell.
I am sorry to "gays" that the Pope has called you "gay." You see, you are not "gay" any more than you are a one-eyed, one-horned, flying purple-people eater. You are a man or a woman made in the image of God and destined for something greater than what you think yourself to be.
I am sorry that Jesuits such as James Martin and bishops such as Blase Cupich and countless others preach that the best way to minister to you is to meet you where you are in the sewer of sodomy and leave you there to die and spend an eternity in Hell.
I am sorry that the priests and prelates of the Catholic Church abused many of you physically and now continue to do so spiritually.
I am sorry that Raymond Lahey, a man who was once the Bishop of Antigonish was a chronic masturbator and did so by exploiting boys through the purchase of child pornography.
I am sorry that you "gays" will die sooner, be sicker, suffer from the most disgusting diseases as a result of perverted behaviour against God and nature and will be more susceptible to drug abuse, partner-abuse, mental health issues and suicide and then you will spend an eternity in Hell.
I am sorry to "gays" that you have been swindled and lied to by a corrupt and degraded culture and society that has not been challenged by the Truth of Christ and His Church.
I am sorry that you think it hate speech to say that your same-sex desires are "objectively disordered" against nature and that the acting out on these desires is "intrinsically disordered" because it is not hate speech but love speech meant to educate to prevent people from going to Hell.
I am sorry that Mohammedans want to kill you and send you to Hell.
I am sorry that you hate Catholics who want you to convert so that you do not go there.
I am sorry that you suffer loneliness but I am not sorry to tell you that the loneliness can be filled by Our Lord Jesus Christ who alone can save you from your sins.
I am sorry that you will ignore this writing and not heed it and then will spend an eternity in Hell.
The number 7 is mentioned nearly 500 times in the Holy Scriptures. It is the number of divine perfection and completion; and it is the number of colours in God's rainbow.
The rainbow was a promise from God. It has become a symbol of the sin which cries out to heaven for vengeance.
That rainbow is six colours. It is inferior to everything. It is an inferior number, less than whole, less than perfect. It is a lie.
And it will be burnt, in God's good time.
Friday 1 July 2016
Jesuits demand Holy Communion for all!
From the magazine published by Anthony Spadaro, S.J., a particularly close Bergoglian confidant.
Communion For All,
Even For Protestants
In addition to the divorced and remarried, for Luther’s
followers as well there are those who are giving the go-ahead for the Eucharist.
Here is how “La Civiltà Cattolica” interprets the pope’s enigmatic words on
intercommunion
by Sandro Magister
http://www.chiesa
ROME, July 1, 2016 – In his way, after encouraging communion
for the divorced and remarried, in that it “is not a prize for the perfect, but
a powerful medicine and nourishment for the weak,” Pope Francis is now also
encouraging Protestants and Catholics to receive communion together at their
respective Masses.
He is doing so, as always, in a discursive, allusive way,
not definitional, leaving the ultimate decision to the individual conscience.
Still emblematic is the answer he gave on November 15, 2015,
on a visit to the Christuskirche, the church of the Lutherans in Rome (see
photo), to a Protestant who asked him if she could receive communion together
with her Catholic husband.
The answer from Francis was a stupefying pinwheel of yes,
no, I don’t know, you figure it out. Which it is indispensable to reread in its
entirety, in the official transcription:
“Thank you, Ma’am. Regarding the question on sharing the Lord’s Supper, it is not easy for me to answer you, especially in front of a theologian like Cardinal Kasper! I’m afraid! I think the Lord gave us [the answer] when he gave us this command: ‘Do this in memory of me’. And when we share in, remember and emulate the Lord’s Supper, we do the same thing that the Lord Jesus did. And the Lord’s Supper will be, the final banquet will there be in the New Jerusalem, but this will be the last. Instead on the journey, I wonder – and I don’t know how to answer, but I am making your question my own – I ask myself: “Is sharing the Lord’s Supper the end of a journey or is it the viaticum for walking together? I leave the question to the theologians, to those who understand. It is true that in a certain sense sharing is saying that there are no differences between us, that we have the same doctrine – I underline the word, a difficult word to understand – but I ask myself: don’t we have the same Baptism? And if we have the same Baptism, we have to walk together. You are a witness to an even profound journey because it is a conjugal journey, truly a family journey, of human love and of shared faith. We have the same Baptism. When you feel you are a sinner – I too feel I am quite a sinner – when your husband feels he is a sinner, you go before the Lord and ask forgiveness; your husband does the same and goes to the priest and requests absolution. They are ways of keeping Baptism alive. When you pray together, that Baptism grows, it becomes strong; when you teach your children who Jesus is, why Jesus came, what Jesus did, you do the same, whether in Lutheran or Catholic terms, but it is the same. The question: and the Supper? There are questions to which only if one is honest with oneself and with the few theological lights that I have, one must respond the same, you see. ‘This is my Body, this is my Blood’, said the Lord, ‘do this in memory of me’, and this is a viaticum which helps us to journey. I had a great friendship with an Episcopalian bishop, 48 years old, married with two children, and he had this concern: a Catholic wife, Catholic children, and he a bishop. He accompanied his wife and children to Mass on Sundays and then went to worship with his community. It was a step of participating in the Lord’s Supper. Then he passed on, the Lord called him, a just man. I respond to your question only with a question: how can I participate with my husband, so that the Lord’s Supper may accompany me on my path? It is a problem to which each person must respond. A pastor friend of mine said to me: ‘We believe that the Lord is present there. He is present. You believe that the Lord is present. So what is the difference?’ – ‘Well, there are explanations, interpretations…’. Life is greater than explanations and interpretations. Always refer to Baptism: “One faith, one baptism, one Lord”, as Paul tells us, and take the outcome from there. I would never dare give permission to do this because I do not have the authority. One Baptism, one Lord, one faith. Speak with the Lord and go forward. I do not dare say more.”
It is impossible to gather a clear indication from these
words. Of course, however, by speaking in such a “liquid” form Pope Francis has
brought everything into question again, concerning intercommunion between
Catholics and Protestants. He has made any position thinkable, and therefore
practicable.
In fact, in the Lutheran camp the pope’s words were
immediately taken as a go-ahead for intercommunion.
But now in the Catholic camp as well an analogous position
statement has come, which presents itself above all as the authentic
interpretation of the words Francis said at the Lutheran church of Rome.
Acting as the pope’s authorized interpreter is the Jesuit
Giancarlo Pani, in the latest issue of “La Civiltà Cattolica,” the magazine
directed by Fr. Antonio Spadaro that has now become the official voice of Casa
Santa Marta, meaning of Jorge Mario Bergoglio himself, who reviews and adjusts
the articles that most interest him before their publication.
Taking his cue from a recent joint declaration of the
Catholic episcopal conference of the United States and of the Evangelical Lutheran
Church in America, Fr. Pani dedicates the entire second part of his article to
the exegesis of the words of Francis at the Christuskirche in Rome, carefully
selected from among those most useful for the purpose.
And he draws the conclusion from them that they marked “a
change” and “a progress in pastoral practice,” analogous to the one produced by
“Amoris Laetitia” for the divorced and remarried.
They are only “small steps forward,” Pani writes in the
final paragraph. But the direction is set.
And it is the same one in which Francis moves when he
declares – as he did during the return flight from Armenia – that Luther “was a
reformer” with good intentions and his reform was “medicine for the Church,”
skipping over the essential dogmatic divergences between Protestants and
Catholics concerning the sacrament of the Eucharist, because – in the words of
Francis at the Christuskirche in Rome – “life is greater than explanations and
interpretations.”
So here are the main passages of the article by Fr. Pani in
“La Civiltà Cattolica.”
____________
On intercommunion between Catholics and Protestants
by Giancarlo Pani, S.J.
On October 31, 2015, the feast of the Reformation, the
Catholic episcopal conference of the United States and the Evangelical Lutheran
Church in America published a joint declaration that summarizes the history of
ecumenism over the past half century. [. . .] The text was released after the
closing of the synod of bishops on the family and in view of the shared
commemoration of the 500th anniversary of the Reformation in 2017. [. . .]
The document concludes with a significant positive proposal:
“The possibility of occasional admission of members of our churches to
Eucharistic communion with the other side (communicatio in sacris) could be
offered more clearly and regulated more compassionately.” [. . .]
The visit of Pope Francis to the Christuskirche of Rome
Two weeks after the promulgation of the declaration, last
November 15, Pope Francis visited the Christuskirche, the Evangelical Lutheran
Church of Rome. [. . .]
During the meeting, there was also a conversation between
the pope and the faithful. Among the various contributions was that of a
Lutheran lady, married to a Catholic, who asked what could be done so that she
could participate together with her husband in Eucharistic communion. And she
specified: “We have lived together happily for many years, sharing joys and
pains. And therefore we are very much hurt by being divided in faith and not
being able to participate together in the Lord’s Supper.”
Responding, Pope Francis posed a question: “Is sharing the
Lord’s Supper the end of a journey or is it the viaticum for walking together?”
The answer to this question was given by Vatican II, in the
decree “Unitatis Redintegratio”: “Yet worship in common (communicatio in
sacris) is not to be considered as a means to be used indiscriminately for the
restoration of Christian unity. There are two main principles governing the
practice of such common worship: first, the bearing witness to the unity of the
Church, and second, the sharing in the means of grace. Witness to the unity of
the Church very generally forbids common worship to Christians, but the grace
to be had from it sometimes commends this practice. The course to be adopted,
with due regard to all the circumstances of time, place, and persons, is to be
decided by local episcopal authority.”
This position is reiterated and expanded by the instructions
for the application of the principles and norms on ecumenism of 1993, approved
by Pope John Paul II, where it says: “The sharing of spiritual activities and
resources must reflect this twofold reality: 1) the real communion in the life
of the Spirit that already exists among Christians and is expressed in their
prayer and in liturgical worship; 2) the incomplete character of this communion
on account of differences of faith and because of ways of thinking that are
irreconcilable with a full sharing of spiritual gifts.”
The instructions therefore place the accent on the
“incomplete character of the communion” of the Churches, from which follows the
limitation of access to the Eucharistic sacrament. But if the Churches
recognize each other to be in apostolic succession and admit each others’
ministers and sacraments, they enjoy greater access to the sacraments
themselves, which in any case, according to the document, must not be general
and indiscriminate. Sacramental sharing instead remains limited for the
Churches that do not have a communion and unity of faith on the Church,
apostolicity, ministers, and sacraments.
Nonetheless, Catholic theology wisely maintains guidelines
of ample breadth, in such a way as to consider case by case – as the decree
“Unitatis Redintegratio” recalls – with a discernment that belongs to the local
ordinary. In this sense, at least after the promulgation of the instructions,
it can no longer be said that “non-Catholics can never receive communion in a
Catholic Eucharistic celebration.” It is interesting to note how the same logic
of “pastoral discernment” has been applied by Pope Francis in his apostolic
exhortation “Amoris Laetitia” (nos. 304-306).
Can there be shared participation in the Lord’s Supper?
At this point it comes back to Pope Francis, who continues:
“But do we not have the same baptism? And if we have the same baptism, we have
to walk together. You [the pope is referring to the lady who posed the
question] are a witness to a journey that can be profound, because it is a
conjugal journey, truly a family journey, of human love and shared faith. [. .
.] When you feel that you are a sinner – I too feel I am quite a sinner – when
your husband feels that he is a sinner, you go before the Lord and ask
forgiveness; your husband does the same
and goes to the priest and requests absolution. They are ways of keeping
baptism alive. When you pray together, that baptism grows, it becomes strong.
[. . .] The question: and the Supper?
There are questions to which only if one is honest with oneself and with the
few theological lights that I have, one must respond the same. [. . .] ‘This is
my body, this is my blood,’ said the Lord, ‘do this in memory of me,’ and this
is a viaticum that helps us to journey.”
But then can there be shared participation in the Lord’s
Supper? In this regard the pope has made a distinction: “I would never dare
give permission to do this because I do not have the authority.” Then he added,
recalling the words of the apostle Paul: “One baptism, one Lord, one faith (Eph
4:5), and he exhorted, continuing: “It is a problem to which each person must
respond. [. . .] Speak with the Lord and go forward.”
Here there comes into play the Church’s main mission, also
formulated in the Code of Canon Law as “salus animarum, quae in Ecclesia
suprema lex esse debet” (cf. 1752). The necessity of a concrete evaluation on
each individual case is absolutely reiterated from that which is the primary
mission of the Church, the “salus animarum.” By virtue of which, in the face of
extreme cases, access to the life of grace that the sacraments guarantee, above
all in the case of the administration of the Eucharist and of reconciliation,
becomes a pastoral and moral imperative.
The pastoral approach of Pope Francis
The pope’s position seems to be a reaffirmation of the
instructions of Vatican II. But there is no overlooking the fact that a change
has taken place, and it can even be understood as progress in pastoral
practice. In fact Francis, as bishop of Rome and pastor of the universal
Church, in reiterating what was affirmed by the Council inserts that practice
within the historical journey that the Lutheran-Catholic dialogue carried out
with regard to the sacrament of reconciliation and of the Eucharist. The 1993
instructions already noted that “in certain circumstances, by way of exception
and under particular conditions, admission to these sacraments can be
authorized and even recommended for Christians of other Churches and ecclesial
communities.”
Moreover, ten years before, the Code of Canon Law dictated
the conditions under which the faithful of Churches born from the Reformation
(Lutherans, Anglicans, etc.) can receive the sacraments in particular
circumstances: for example, if they “cannot approach a minister of their own
community and seek such on their own accord, provided that they manifest
Catholic faith in respect to these sacraments and are properly disposed” (can.
844 § 4).
Pope John Paul II, in the 2003 encyclical letter “Ecclesia
de Eucharistia,” clarified several points in this regard, asserting that “these
conditions, from which no dispensation can be given, must be carefully
respected, even though they deal with specific individual cases,” like that of
“the danger of death or some other grave necessity.” The intention of these
clarifications is always the pastoral care of persons, with special attention
that this not lead to indifferentism.
Here it must be made clear that if on the one hand the
prudential and restrictive measures that the Church set up in the past were
based on sacramental theology, on the other its pastoral mission and the
salvation of souls that it has at its heart reveal the value of the Lord’s
grace and the sharing of spiritual goods. Pope Francis has expressed particular
attention for the problems of persons in the “communicatio in sacris,” in the
light of the developments in Church teaching from the Council to the 1993
instructions on principles and norms of ecumenism, from the 1999 joint
declaration on the doctrine of justification to the 2013 text “From conflict to
communion,” up to the latest declaration of 2015.
This is a matter of small steps forward in pastoral
practice. Norms and doctrine must be guided ever more by the evangelical logic
of mercy, by the pastoral care of the faithful, by attention to the problems of
the person and by the enhancement of the conscience illuminated by the Gospel
and by the Spirit of God.
Benedict XVI admits "gay lobby" power in Vatican
Joseph Ratzinger should have outed these filthy rats. Now, Jorge Bergoglio has become their best friend.
In memoirs, ex Pope Benedict saysVatican 'gay lobby' tried to wield power: report
By Philip Pullella
VATICAN CITY (Reuters) - Former Pope Benedict says in his memoirs that no-one pressured him to resign but alleges that a "gay lobby" in the Vatican had tried to influence decisions, a leading Italian newspaper reported on Friday.
The book, called "The Last Conversations", is the first time in history that a former pope judges his own pontificate after it is over. It is due to be published on Sept. 9.
Citing health reasons, Benedict in 2013 became the first pope in six centuries to resign. He promised to remain "hidden to the world" and has been living in a former convent in the Vatican gardens.Italy's Corriere della Sera daily, which has acquired the Italian newspaper rights for excerpts and has access to the book, ran a long article on Friday summarizing its key points.
In the book, Benedict says that he came to know of the presence of a "gay lobby" made up of four or five people who were seeking to influence Vatican decisions. The article says Benedict says he managed to "break up this power group".
Benedict resigned following a turbulent papacy that included the so-call "Vatileaks" case, in which his butler leaked some of his personal letters and other documents that alleged corruption and a power struggle in the Vatican.
Italian media at the time reported that a faction of prelates who wanted to discredit Benedict and pressure him to resign was behind the leaks.
POPE'S DIARY
The Church has maintained its centuries-long opposition to homosexual acts.
But rights campaigners have long said many gay people work for the Vatican and Church sources have said they suspect that some have banded together to support each other's careers and influence decisions in the bureaucracy.
Benedict, who now has the title "emeritus pope," has always maintained that he made his choice to leave freely and Corriere says that in the book Benedict "again denies blackmail or pressure".He says he told only a few people close to him of his intention to resign, fearing it would be leaked before he made the surprise announcement on Feb. 11, 2013.
The former pope, in the book-long interview with German writer Peter Seewald, says he had to overcome his own doubts on the effect his choice could have on the future of the papacy.He says that he was "incredulous" when cardinals meeting in a secret conclave chose him to succeed the late Pope John Paul II in 2005 and that he was "surprised" when the cardinals chose Francis as his successor in 2013.
Anger over the dysfunctional state of the Vatican bureaucracy in 2013 was one factor in the cardinal electors' decision to choose a non-European pope for the first time in nearly 1,300 years.Benedict "admits his lack of resoluteness in governing," Corriere says.
In the book, whose lead publisher is Germany's Droemer Knaur, Benedict says he kept a diary throughout his papacy but will destroy it, even though he realizes that for historians it would be a "golden opportunity".
https://ca.news.yahoo.com/memoirs-ex-pope-benedict-says-vatican-gay-lobby-105129237.html
Thursday 30 June 2016
Jorge Bergoglio violates the Catechism on Capital Punishment
If I, as a Catholic, stood in public and delivered an address, or wrote here on this blog, something that is entirely inconsistent with the Catechism of the Catholic Church and two millennia of teaching, I would be called at best a dissenter, and at worst, a heretic.
If I gave it as a private opinion, that is one thing, but if I were in a teaching position at a Catholic university or if I were a cleric in an exalted position, that would be something quite different.
What if I did this and I happened to be the Bishop of Rome, the Pope?
Capital Punishment is morally permissible. It is even justified in some cases. We do not need to get into a debate here about which case and when it should be used, it is simply fact.
Killing is sometimes necessary. If someone attempts to kill me or my wife or the child next door, I am morally obligated as a man to stop it, even if it means I must kill that person.This is not against the Fifth Commandment which speaks of "willful murder."
Nation states are free to choose whether capital punishment is something for their lands. Most have abolished it, certainly in the West, except for the United States, Belarus and some Caribbean island nations. The rest include China, Africa, Asia and the Middle East and mostly in Islamic countries. Frankly, I regret that in certain cases, it is not an option in Canada. We can list recent heinous murderers and rapists such as Paul Bernardo, Clifford Olson and Robert Pickton.
So just who is Pope Bergoglio lecturing here?
If we are to believe this Pope Bergoglio, then God Himself is a great violator of His own Commandments, for He ordered Israel on many occasions to kill its enemies.
I am well aware of what Pope John Paul II said about Capital Punishment, it is not the same.
This Bishop of Rome has also stated that "life in prison is like a death sentence." Presumably then, we should just let murders and rapists and sodomites who committed buggery on children should roam around after a few years under some lie of "mercy" only to do it again.
Jorge Bergoglio is free to hold any heterodox position he chooses to hold, It is his soul.
He is not free to promulgate heresy throughout the world.
If I gave it as a private opinion, that is one thing, but if I were in a teaching position at a Catholic university or if I were a cleric in an exalted position, that would be something quite different.
What if I did this and I happened to be the Bishop of Rome, the Pope?
Capital Punishment is morally permissible. It is even justified in some cases. We do not need to get into a debate here about which case and when it should be used, it is simply fact.
Killing is sometimes necessary. If someone attempts to kill me or my wife or the child next door, I am morally obligated as a man to stop it, even if it means I must kill that person.This is not against the Fifth Commandment which speaks of "willful murder."
Nation states are free to choose whether capital punishment is something for their lands. Most have abolished it, certainly in the West, except for the United States, Belarus and some Caribbean island nations. The rest include China, Africa, Asia and the Middle East and mostly in Islamic countries. Frankly, I regret that in certain cases, it is not an option in Canada. We can list recent heinous murderers and rapists such as Paul Bernardo, Clifford Olson and Robert Pickton.
So just who is Pope Bergoglio lecturing here?
If we are to believe this Pope Bergoglio, then God Himself is a great violator of His own Commandments, for He ordered Israel on many occasions to kill its enemies.
I am well aware of what Pope John Paul II said about Capital Punishment, it is not the same.
This Bishop of Rome has also stated that "life in prison is like a death sentence." Presumably then, we should just let murders and rapists and sodomites who committed buggery on children should roam around after a few years under some lie of "mercy" only to do it again.
Jorge Bergoglio is free to hold any heterodox position he chooses to hold, It is his soul.
He is not free to promulgate heresy throughout the world.
Labels:
More Bergoglian heresy,
Pope Francis
Wednesday 29 June 2016
Pope's comments on marriage are "reckless ... troubling" and an "unacceptable opinion"
They're finally getting it.
Conservative NovusOrdoIsm is waking up to our reality!
http://www.onepeterfive.com/ewtn-panel-popes-comments-on-marriage-unacceptable-reckless/
Conservative NovusOrdoIsm is waking up to our reality!
http://www.onepeterfive.com/ewtn-panel-popes-comments-on-marriage-unacceptable-reckless/
Labels:
More Bergoglian heresy,
Pope Francis,
Raymond Arroyo
SSPX issues communique - "The proclamation of Catholic doctrine requires the denunciation of errors that have made their way into it and are unfortunately encouraged including (by) the Pope himself."
The Society of St. Pius X has issued a communique today following its meeting of major superiors.
The Pope is in error on much, he has sown seeds of discord and promulgated confusion, insults and he has even written and spoken heretical statements and praised the enemies of Catholicism. He has prayed with the enemies of Christ, the Mohammedans (as have his two predecessors) and he has asked schismatic and heretical sect leaders who have lead millions of Catholics away from the true Faith, to "bless" him.
On a weekly basis, Jorge Bergoglio gives scandal to the true Faith and to faithful Catholics everywhere.
The time is coming when great churchmen will need to confront him and denounce his actions and this papacy.
He, who is pictured below, will be amongst them.
The Pope is in error on much, he has sown seeds of discord and promulgated confusion, insults and he has even written and spoken heretical statements and praised the enemies of Catholicism. He has prayed with the enemies of Christ, the Mohammedans (as have his two predecessors) and he has asked schismatic and heretical sect leaders who have lead millions of Catholics away from the true Faith, to "bless" him.
On a weekly basis, Jorge Bergoglio gives scandal to the true Faith and to faithful Catholics everywhere.
The time is coming when great churchmen will need to confront him and denounce his actions and this papacy.
He, who is pictured below, will be amongst them.
At the conclusion of the meeting of the major
superiors of the Society of Saint Pius X that was held in Switzerland, from
June 25 to 28, 2016, the Superior General addressed the following communiqué:
The purpose of the Society of Saint Pius X is
chiefly the formation of priests, the essential condition for the renewal of
the Church and for the restoration of society.
- In the great and painful confusion that currently reigns in the Church, the proclamation of Catholic doctrine requires the denunciation of errors that have made their way into it and are unfortunately encouraged by a large number of pastors, including the Pope himself.
- The Society of Saint Pius X, in the present state of grave necessity which gives it the right and duty to administer spiritual aid to the souls that turn to it, does not seek primarily a canonical recognition, to which it has a right as a Catholic work. It has only one desire: faithfully to bring the light of the bi-millennial Tradition which shows the only route to follow in this age of darkness in which the cult of man replaces the worship of God, in society as in the Church.
- The “restoration of all things in Christ” intended by Saint Pius X, following Saint Paul (cf. Ep.h 1:10), cannot happen without the support of a Pope who concretely favors the return to Sacred Tradition. While waiting for that blessed day, the Society of Saint Pius X intends to redouble its efforts to establish and to spread, with the means that Divine Providence gives to it, the social reign of Our Lord Jesus Christ.
- The Society of Saint Pius X prays and does penance for the Pope, that he might have the strength to proclaim Catholic faith and morals in their entirety. In this way he will hasten the triumph of the Immaculate Heart of Mary that we earnestly desire as we approach the centennial of the apparitions in Fatima.
Bishop Bernard Fellay, Superior General of the
Society of Saint Pius X
Ecône, June 29, 2016
The Feast of Saints Peter and Paul
Tuesday 28 June 2016
A young reader asks, "Who will apologise to my parents?
From the combox and out of the mouths of babes, though I suspect Michael would not want to be called one...
My name is Michael, I am 12 years old. My mom
has been homeschooling us, my two sisters and myself for 6 years. My youngest
brother (3 years old) will also be home-schooled.
My parents have sacrificed so
much for us to have a better education than the one offered in the schools, but
most of all to protect us from the evil that was and is being taught in the
schools.
I see my mom sometimes cry and she apologizes to us for the world the
way it is, that we cannot have a childhood like she had. We tell her she
doesn't have to say sorry, it's not her fault. I do not understand what is happening
in the Church, I just know it is not right.
Why do we have to apologize to
people who say they are lgbtqrstuvwxyz, because I know God only
created two genders, male and female, and He blessed them. So they choose to go
against God. I don't understand why people clap in church, I don't understand
why they talk and laugh while Jesus hangs on the cross up at the altar, and
looks at them from the Tabernacle.
I may be a kid, but who will apologize to my
parents for having to sacrifice everything to keep us from the evil of this
world, who have sacrificed everything to teach us properly about God, about
His Church, to teach us to stand up for what is right even if it means we might
not have any friends?
Who will say sorry to my parents especially my mom, who
has gone to meetings with teachers and principals and written letters to the
priests and cardinals, so that they might change something at least in the so
called catholic school, so that we could go without being looked at like
weirdos?
We went back last year for 6 months and it was not good, at
all. We will be homeschooled for good now, which means my mom has to stay home
with us all the time, my dad has to work longer hours because he is the only
one working to support us.
Who will apologize to my parents, will you Pope
Francis? My name is Michael and I love God and I love my parents and I hope
that there are still good priests and bishops and cardinals who will do
something to stop this evil.
Ps. I got permission from my parents to write a
comment.
Thank you.
Labels:
Crisis in the Church
The Pope Francis praise of Martin Luther began with Pope Benedict XVI - they are in fact, two sides of the same modernist coin, but not just them.
Through the research of a very welcomed and regular commenter on this blog, Mark Thomas, comes a reminder which most of us may have forgotten. After posting this, Wolverine, another commenter, left a link to a New York Times article from 1983 where John Paul II himself, also praised Martin Luther wherein the Times states:
"The Pope referred to Luther as the theologian who ''contributed in a substantial way to the radical change in the ecclesiastical and secular reality in the West.'' He continued: ''Our world still experiences his great impact on history.''In the interests of truth and fairness, it is incumbent upon us to be thorough and honest in our criticism of Pope Francis. This scandal did not begin with him and sadly, it does not appear that it will end with him.
The recent aeroplane interview, a regular occurrence and cross, so it seems, has revealed much more. As I wrote previously, there is also his praise of the wretched heretic Martin Luther, who's act 500 years ago will be commemorated by Pope Bergoglio in Lund, Sweden this coming October, presumably. Whilst we are justifiably concerned about the comments of Pope Francis pertaining to our need for sorrow over how we've abused sodomites for two millennia, our focus should also on the praise of the man who ripped apart Christendom and lead tens to hundreds of millions of souls to Hell.
Jorge Bergoglio was not the first Pope to praise him, Joseph Ratzinger was!
Look, the problem we have today with Pope Francis is because of Pope Benedict XVI. His actions in February 2013 lead to this. He is responsible. He forsook his office. He abandoned his flock to be hounded by wolves - modernist, heretical, savage wolves, worse than himself.
Earlier today, at a celebration of the 65th anniversary of his ordination, Joseph Ratzinger who gave no sign of being incapable of still being Pope, said:
Earlier today, at a celebration of the 65th anniversary of his ordination, Joseph Ratzinger who gave no sign of being incapable of still being Pope, said:
"His goodness from the first election day and in every moment of my life, I am struck. His goodness is the place where I live and I feel protected"
Lay the cause at the feet of the problem and hold to the fire the feet of those who refuse to fix it.
The Pope, Martin Luther, and Our Time
September 25, 2011 A.D., by Mark Brumley, The
Catholic World Report
“Martin Luther” is not a popular figure in most
Catholic circles. But now here comes Pope Benedict XVI, a fellow German,
visiting his homeland and speaking to German Evangelical Christians, i.e.
Lutherans, as we call them here.
"The Holy Father seems comfortable talking
about Luther with Lutherans, even talking with obvious regard and sympathy for
Luther. Shocking? Not to those who have followed the nuances of Catholic
teaching on non-Catholic Christians as it has developed, especially as
expressed in the teaching of the Second Vatican Council and in papal teaching
since then.
"Pope Benedict shows how a Catholic can
have a certain sympathetic reading of Luther, notwithstanding the same
Catholic’s rejection of Luther’s repudiation of the Catholic Church.
"In this way, a Catholic can see what is
most important when it comes to assessing Luther—not denying the problems with
him but also not overlooking what Luther got right or demonizing him.
"In his address Benedict makes a number of
key points regarding Luther. First, there is Luther’s “burning question”, as
Benedict puts it: “what is God’s position towards me, where do I stand before
God?” This remains the central question of life today, even though many people
don’t realize it.
"Second, there is Luther’s Christ-centered
spirituality. Benedict clearly thinks on both of these points Luther is right
and that calling attention to this fact is important for all Christians today.
"When it comes to ecumenism, the most
important point for Benedict is that we keep in view our common ground as
Christians: “It was the error of the Reformation period that for the most part
we could only see what divided us and we failed to grasp existentially what we
have in common in terms of the great deposit of sacred Scripture and the early
Christian creeds. For me, the great ecumenical step forward of recent decades
is that we have become aware of all this common ground, that we acknowledge it
as we pray and sing together, as we make our joint commitment to the Christian
ethos in our dealings with the world, as we bear common witness to the God of Jesus
Christ in this world as our inalienable, shared foundation.”
Labels:
Crisis in the Church,
Pope Benedict,
Pope Francis
Monday 27 June 2016
Pope Bergoglio is "angry"
It seems that the Pope is angry because the media has not told "the truth of things" relating to deaconnettes? It was one of the other little gems that came out of his interview enroute home from Armenia.
It seems that this Pope has you to make a determination that he should stop talking off the cuff - be it in an aeroplane or anywhere else because every time he does he says something that makes the Catholic faithful groan and the world raise its mockery to just one more level.
Perhaps he should look in the mirror and see the problem first hand.
It seems that this Pope has you to make a determination that he should stop talking off the cuff - be it in an aeroplane or anywhere else because every time he does he says something that makes the Catholic faithful groan and the world raise its mockery to just one more level.
Perhaps he should look in the mirror and see the problem first hand.
Vatican City, Jun 27, 2016 / 01:20 pm (CNA/EWTN
News).- Pope Francis told journalists on Sunday that he was somewhat angered
when reports emerged that the Church was allegedly paving the way for the
ordination of women to the diaconate, since no such change is in the works.
“The first to be surprised by this news was
me,” the Pope said June 26 during an in-flight press briefing en route to Rome
following his three-day visit to Armenia.
“They said: 'The Church opens the door to
deaconesses.' Really? I am a bit angry because this is not telling the truth of
things.”
http://www.catholicnewsagency.com/news/pope-francis-angry-over-media-slant-on-women-deacons-55348/
Labels:
More Bergoglian heresy,
Pope Francis
Bergoglio praised Luther - who will denounce him?
Lest you think that this Bergoglio only betrayed the faithful Catholics in Courage and those such as Joseph Sciambra, how about the fact that he praised Martin Luther!
In the rest of that disgusting, rambling, incoherent, offensive and pathetic bile on the interview back from Armenia there was even this praise of that filthy heretic who caused the loss of tens of millions of souls into Hell.
Now, this Bergoglio praised him, along with sodomites, as he warms up for his trip to Sweden. What more idiocy can this man say on his next plane trip home from somewhere.
In the rest of that disgusting, rambling, incoherent, offensive and pathetic bile on the interview back from Armenia there was even this praise of that filthy heretic who caused the loss of tens of millions of souls into Hell.
Now, this Bergoglio praised him, along with sodomites, as he warms up for his trip to Sweden. What more idiocy can this man say on his next plane trip home from somewhere.
Where are the cardinals and bishops who will find the courage to call this man a danger to the faith and a heretic?
Kleinjung: Too much beer … Holy Father, I
wanted to ask you a question. Today you spoke of the gifts of the shared
Churches, of the gifts shared by the Churches together. Seeing that you will go
in I believe four months to Lund for the commemoration of the 500th anniversary
of the reformation, I think perhaps this is also the right moment for us not
only to remember the wounds on both sides but also to recognize the gifts of
the reformation. Perhaps also – this is a heretical question – perhaps to annul
or withdraw the excommunication of Martin Luther or of some sort of
rehabilitation. Thank you.
Pope Francis: I think that the intentions of
Martin Luther were not mistaken. He was a reformer. Perhaps some methods were
not correct. But in that time, if we read the story of the Pastor, a German
Lutheran who then converted when he saw reality – he became Catholic – in that
time, the Church was not exactly a model to imitate. There was corruption in
the Church, there was worldliness, attachment to money, to power...and this he
protested. Then he was intelligent and took some steps forward justifying, and
because he did this. And today Lutherans and Catholics, Protestants, all of us
agree on the doctrine of justification. On this point, which is very important,
he did not err. He made a medicine for the Church, but then this medicine
consolidated into a state of things, into a state of a discipline, into a way
of believing, into a way of doing, into a liturgical way and he wasn’t alone;
there was Zwingli, there was Calvin, each one of them different, and behind
them were who? Principals! We must put ourselves in the story of that time.
It’s a story that’s not easy to understand, not easy. Then things went forward,
and today the dialogue is very good. That document of justification I think is
one of the richest ecumenical documents in the world, one in most agreement.
But there are divisions, and these also depend on the Churches. In Buenos Aires
there were two Lutheran churches, and one thought in one way and the other...even
in the same Lutheran church there was no unity; but they respected each other,
they loved each other, and the difference is perhaps what hurt all of us so
badly and today we seek to take up the path of encountering each other after
500 years. I think that we have to pray together, pray. Prayer is important for
this. Second, to work together for the poor, for the persecuted, for many
people, for refugees, for the many who suffer; to work together and pray
together and the theologians who study together try...but this is a long path,
very long. One time jokingly I said: I know when full unity will happen. -
“when?” - “the day after the Son of Man comes,” because we don’t know...the
Holy Spirit will give the grace, but in the meantime, praying, loving each
other and working together. Above all for the poor, for the people who suffer
and for peace and many things...against the exploitation of people and many
things in which they are jointly working together.
Labels:
More Bergoglian heresy,
Pope Francis
JORGE MARIO BERGOGLIO - RENOUNCE THE PAPACY!
The face of a malefactor!
The face of a heretic!
As I awake at early dawn, the press is elated. The world is in praise.
New York Times
BBC
CNN
Times of London
CBS
The Guardian
This man called "Pope Francis" is trending on social media.
A Catholic teacher has been fired in Edmonton, Canada.
In an Ontario city, another Catholic teachers has been suspended with pay and sent for re-education.
In Hamilton, Ontario, the government is fighting in court a Greek Orthodox parent for removing his child from blatant sexual education classes.
Three cases. Real. Current. The laity and good priests will now be persecuted because of Jorge Mario Bergoglio and his evil, imprudent remarks on the aeroplane returning from Armenia. All three involve people defending Christian morality and Catholic teaching.
He twists the catechism to suit his aims and the zeitgeist. He speaks of "discrimination."
No! The CCC says they must be free from "unjust discrimination" which means that certain types are in fact, just!
He does not state the rest, that the orientation is objectively disordered and the act is intrinsically disordered. He speaks of "pastoral" need and has allowed the media today and moving forward to beat every Catholic priest, teacher or layman who dares to speak the truth.
Bergoglio has thrown all of us under the bus of perversion and the sodomitical juggernaut.
This man will leave people suffering from same-sex attraction in their sin. They will die and go to Hell.
They will not be alone!
He may very well be with them, staring into their faces, hating each other for having rejected God and His truth.
Yes, Jorge Mario Bergoglio will go to Hell if he does not amend his ways and teach the faith.
A disgrace to the papacy.
A boil on the Body of Christ.
Labels:
More Bergoglian heresy,
Pope Francis
Sunday 26 June 2016
Jorge Bergoglio - You are a malefactor and unfit as Vicar of Our Lord Jesus Christ, for what it is worth, I denounce you!
Not a week goes by, not an aeroplane trip ending without Jorge Bergoglio saying something that is a scandal and a disgrace to the Chair of Peter. On the trip back from Armenia, Bergoglio has said that:
He has said that the "Church" and "Christians" and "we" must apologise to "Gays" for how we have treated them.
I, Vox Cantoris, do hereby apologise.
I apologise to Graham, a gay singing colleague in a church choir years ago, who was invited to my home for a barbeque with the others. I apologise for including you and not throwing you off my property when it was revealed that evening that you were "gay."
I apologise to Alan who shared my table with other friends at Christmas dinner and whom I shared more than one private dinner together during his journey to Christ. I apologise for treating you as any other sinful brother in Christ and not denouncing you as a wretched sodomite.
I apologise to my former dog-groomer and neighbour for not insulting your lesbian lifestyle and appreciating the good work and friendliness over and above your despicable and immoral choice.
Shall I go on?
Every Catholic whom I know follows the Catechism of the Catholic Church. Every "trad!" We respect the individual. We do not condone the sin or the societal sodomitic juggernaut that has become all encompassing and now even affects the very highest in the Church, as well.
I will not apologise for stating that sodomy is evil and that people who engage in it are in a grievous state of mortal sin which, if unrepented, will put them in Hell. I will not apologise for the times which I have denounced sodomite priests and bishops and the agenda against the true Faith!
There is more in the latest interview, including about how we have wronged women too. An outright lie! Only the Catholic Church emancipated women for 2000 years.
Let us get to the point.
Jorge Bergoglio is a disgrace, a scandal, a malefactor. He is a disgrace to the Chair of Peter and unfit as Vicar of Christ.
These comments by him are deplorable, That they come the week and month when sodomitical choices are being thrown at us is detestable.
This stupid, evil man. This perfect Modernist, this liberal, this heretic. Enough of his blathering and his idiotic statements. This stupid, evil man will now have these comments used by the Church's enemies to persecute priests, catholic teachers and laity who stand by the truth. The media is already manipulating the stupid statement about "discrimination" and will use it to beat up every faithful Catholic.
The Pope is a malefactor, an evil doer.
When he came out that night on the loggia, I sat there watching suppressing the physical urge to vomit. I had never heard of Jorge Bergoglio but deep inside, it was if I had seen the evil incarnate and a deep sense of foreboding descended. It lasted hours.
What else, friends?
Do not look back and say, "I miss Pope Benedict." No! This is Joseph Ratzinger's doing. Joseph Ratzinger deserted his children. He abandoned us to the wolves. His action directly allowed this malefactor Bergoglio to seize the Chair of Peter.
Bishops, Cardinals. You must denounce this Pope and his errors.
You will be held accountable by God for the betrayal you have countenanced.
O good St. Joseph, open his eyes or close them!
Labels:
Pope Francis
Saturday 25 June 2016
Is Cardinal Reinhard Marx a homosexual?
Come out all the way out Eminence. It is "pride" month after all which as you once knew,"goes before the fall."
What an malefactor.. What a disgusting, shepherd. What a wolf who would let people die in their sin.
Does this man believe in Hell? He will when he gets there.
Come out, come out wherever you are!
What an malefactor.. What a disgusting, shepherd. What a wolf who would let people die in their sin.
Does this man believe in Hell? He will when he gets there.
Come out, come out wherever you are!
Catholic Church should apologize to gays, says papal adviser Cardinal Marx
DUBLIN, Ireland, June 24, 2016 (LifeSiteNews) -- One of Pope Francis’ leading advisors has declared that the Catholic Church should publicly apologize to homosexuals for what he called its scandalous and terrible treatment of them.
The comments by German Cardinal Reinhard Marx, one of the council of nine cardinals chosen by Pope Francis to advise him, were reported in the Irish Times June 23.
“The history of homosexuals in our societies is very bad because we’ve done a lot to marginalize [them],” he said, adding that as a Church and as a society “we’ve also to say ‘sorry, sorry.’”
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)