The Cowardly Episcopacy

The best analysis on the subject in some time from LifeSiteNews, those nasty radicals, and Taliban Catholics run out of "somebody's basement in the Ottawa valley."

"These smooth, plump men did not sign on for combat, did not sign on for marches, for vigils, for interrogations in courtrooms or for jail terms. As priests they were instantly deferred to and respected by their own flocks. As bishops they get even more of that from their faithful, plus real palaces. But they now find themselves targets for attacks from society at large. They are tasked with feeding their sheep at the same time as defending Christianity’s politically incorrect teachings on homosexuality, abortion and transgenderism, and Catholicism’s particular teachings on a male-only priesthood, divorce and in vitro fertilization."

https://www.lifesitenews.com/opinion/why-some-bishops-behave-the-way-they-do

Thus; we have a logical explanation as to what is wrong with the majority of the bishops of the Church today.

They will never have the courage to act because they are poseurs, effeminates, cowards, narcissists and in some cases, sociopaths.

They do not know Our Lord Jesus Christ.  They do not love Him.

They stay because they are "too old to dig, too proud to beg."

They will be damned.

Don't you be!

Heresiarch SoupItch of Chicago - another episcopal enemy of the faithful!

What the bear wrote!

http://corbiniansbear.blogspot.ca/2016/06/cupich-scapegoats-mentally-ill-to-save.html?spref=fb&m=1

"Here is simple realism. Archbishop Cupich is unfit to have any public position. He is a fool, a tool, and a danger to the faith of Catholics, the dignity of the Church, and the well-being of the public. He is an embarrassment to the handful of Catholics still capable of feeling embarrassed.

Most of all, he is one of those odious and harmful little men who thrive in institutions where there is no accountability and no requirement to actually accomplish anything in the real world. He is coddled and protected by an increasingly out-of-touch Church to the extent he divorces himself from reality and basks in the reflected glow of his own imagined virtues."

Pope Francis' ghostwriter and seminary rector calls for devolution of the Catholic Church

What kind of man poses like this?

He is no man.

Even less is this man worthy to be called an Apostle of Jesus Christ.

He is an effiminate. He is a liar. He is a manipulator; and according to the Prefect of the CDF, he may even be a heretic. 

Certainly, Rome stopped him from becoming a seminary Prefect, until Pope Francis stepped in.

He is the author of "Heal Me With Your Mouth - the Art of Kissing."

He is the ghostwriter of Evangelii Gaudium and probably responsible for that ridiculous Bergoglian phrase, "self-absorbed, Promethean, neo-Pelagian," though it doesn't matter, the Pope own's it. He is the ghost-writer of much or most of Laudato Si, the environmental manifesto worthy of a Marxist undergrad, and; he is the writer of Amoris Laetitia. 

I guess he's Pope Number 3!

Now, this malefactor is calling for more power for the episcopal conferences, even over doctrine. You can read it all, and weep at OnePeterFive.

How long until the Lord will deliver His Church and His faithful from the hands of these deceitful effeminates?

Robert Lynch - another episcopal liar and deceiver

The Sunday  morning attack on a night club in Orlando was an attack on Americans. It was also, no doubt, targeted by the Mohammedan murderer because the club was full of people attending who were "gay" and "lesbian" and "transgendered," which their unholy book orders to be killed. He was simply following his creed.

This was another case of terrorism inspired by Mohammed. This is how Islam spread across the Middle East and North Africa and into parts of southern Europe. By murder, mayhem and butchery. Those who refuse to see history repeating itself will eventually be victims of this same evil. 

Robert Lynch is the Bishop of St. Petersburg. He has just tendered his resignation to Pope Francis, having turned 75. 

He writes on his blog.

"Sadly it is religion, including our own, which targets, mostly verbally, and also often breeds contempt for gays, lesbians and transgender people. Attacks today on LGBT men and women often plant the seed of contempt, then hatred, which can ultimately lead to violence."

His pathetic attempt at drawing an equivalence between the truth of the Catholic faith and vile, act of one Mohammedan inspired by an evil ideology is despicable.

This is the same Bishop who stood by in silence whilst Terry Schindler-Shiavo was murdered by the courts of Florida.

Robert Lynch has been the focus of this blog in the past. He is a disgrace to the Church and has lead many astray. What will he say to Our Lord for Terry and for the past actions and inactions which you will find at this link.

http://voxcantor.blogspot.ca/search/label/Bishop%20Lynch

And these:

The Catholic Church's Secret Gay Cabal 
http://gawker.com/5825254/the-catholic-churchs-secret-gay-cabal

Matt Abbot, The Story of Bishop Robert Lynch 
http://www.renewamerica.com/columns/abbott/070330

Eyewitness has some relevant links!

Lynch pays $100,000 in damages to employee
https://bryanhehirexposed.wordpress.com/2010/04/19/fr-bryan-hehir-keynoting-conference-with-gay-priests-advocate-part-3/

Yet, he denies it was "hush money."
http://www.sptimes.com/2002/03/23/TampaBay/Church_paid_100_000_t.shtml

Thought he victims insists that he was "sexually harassed" by Lynch
http://jacksonville.com/apnews/stories/032302/D7IEFLT01.html

And loves the money of George Soros
http://restore-dc-catholicism.blogspot.ca/2013/08/bishop-lynch-defends-soros-funded.html

Veneremur Cernui cites Voris' remarks and adds a few of his own
https://veneremurcernui.wordpress.com/2013/11/14/michael-voris-takes-on-bishop-robert-lynch/

The Lynching of the Traditional Mass
http://rorate-caeli.blogspot.com/2012/07/you-share-lynching-of-traditional-mass.html

Will Lynch shepherd those with same-sex attraction, or will he leave them in the darkness and certain death?
http://www.sunbeamtimes.com/2015/02/23/open-letter-to-bishop-lynch-on-same-sex-marriage-homosexual-chastity-and-salvation/

Richard Sipe lists him, amongst a whole bunch of others!
http://www.awrsipe.com/click_and_learn/2006-08-01-sexual_orientation-4.html

There is so much more.

Satan eats his own - pray for the dead

Forty-nine and maybe more to come, dead. Fifty to include the blood-thirsty Mohammedan.

Many of them were Hispanic and most likely, Catholic.

They rejected the truth or were never given it.

Priests and bishops and teachers and parents and other will pay for leaving these poor souls in the darkness of the sin which cries out to heaven for justice.

Pray for their poor souls.

Islam is the other enemy. 

Both are curses upon the earth.

Both are means of chastisement.

Father Hunwicke
http://liturgicalnotes.blogspot.ca/2016/06/requiescant-in-pace.html

Barona
http://torontocatholicwitness.blogspot.ca/2016/06/orlando-florida-how-sins-that-cry-to.html

Daniel Horan, OFM - Liar, Deceiver, Homosexualist - anything else?

This Friar is Daniel Horan, OFM. He has a Facebook and Youtube channel where he promotes his views of Catholicism. You can look him up.

On one video, on the subject of Amoris Laetitia, he shows the picture, below, of two men holding hands because it is all about the Joy of Love. 

People with same-sex attraction are suffering from delusions and from an intellect darkened by mortal sin which cries out to heaven for justice. It has been called a mental disorder or even a mental illness in former times by psychiatric bodies. It is objectively disordered. Acting out is a mortal sin. It is intrinsically disordered. We have, as a society, been convinced that it is not and that they are born in this condition. People must be told and must be brought out of the lifestyle. When a cleric, such as Daniel Horan, features two men holding hands, obvious persons with homosexual inclinations, he affirms them in their sin and their delusion. 

When Daniel Horan dies, he will see their faces for all eternity in Hell for not calling them out of their sin and instead leaving them in it.

Men such as Horan are homosexualists. They hate Our Lord Jesus Christ and His Truth. The proof is in their actions. 

They are undermining the Faith and committing evil by their actions and inactions. They must be called out.

Amoris Laetitia, written by a ghostwriter who wrote a book on "kissing" is a disgraceful document. Jorge Bergoglio, Bishop of Rome -- Pope Francis is responsible for it. He is also responsible for the confusion that is within it that allows this Friar to manipulate it for his advantage.

The good news is that under Benedict XVI, these malefactors such as Horan were in hiding. Now they are emboldened and have come out for all to see.

Sunshine is truly the best disinfectant.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LyzIewE6m8A

Cardinal Müller Describes Main Adviser of Pope Francis as "Heretical"

Cardinal Müller Describes Main Adviser of Pope Francis as "Heretical"
http://eponymousflower.blogspot.ca/2016/06/cardinal-muller-describes-main-adviser.html?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed:+TheEponymousFlower+(The+Eponymous+Flower)

(Rome) In recent interview with the Herder Korrespondenz Cardinal Gerhard Müller, Prefect of the CDF, described the closest adviser of Pope Francis as "heretical".

In the June issue of Herder Korrespondenz (issue 6/2006) reaffirmed the Cardinal Prefect, that "no one" should relativize the doctrine of the papacy as a divine institution, for that would mean, wanting to "correct God." Some time ago, there was someone who was presented by "certain media" as one of the "closest advisers" of the Pope, the Cardinal said. This consultant has opined that there would be no problem in transferring the seat of the Pope to Medellin in Colombia or elsewhere, and the various Curia offices could be shared among the various local Churches. This, says Cardinal Müller, is fundamentally wrong and "even heretical". On this subject, it is sufficient to read the Dogmatic Constitution "Lumen Gentium" of Vatican II in order to identify the ecclesiological nonsense of such mind games. "The seat of the pope is Peter's in Rome."

Canadian Catholic Members of Parliament must be publicly shamed and called out - let's start with Celine Cesare-Chavannes

Every Canadian Member of Parliament of the current Liberal Government must agree never to question the nation's lack of any law regulating abortion. This was ordered by Justin Trudeau who deeply admires, "China's basic dictatorship." None of them would have been permitted to run in last October's election had they not agreed to this beforehand. Justin Trudeau is a Catholic.

He has ushered in euthanasia, instead of asserting Parliament's rights and invoking the Constitution's "Notwithstanding Clause." He will legalise marijuana and has already refunded foreign abortions. Will he bring in a proper law to define "beastiality"in the Criminal Code or will Bill Clinton style sex with Fido not be considered sex with an animal?

ContraDiction is writing about Celina Caesare-Chavannes at Holy Family Parish in Whitby, Ontario. The Pastor is aware of the Canon 915 and his parishioner's public positions. I have known about this directly from others in the parish for a while. My advice was for these people to bring their concerns to their Pastor. It is time to out the situation because of the recent vote on euthanasia, amongst other matters.

This is not gossip; it is public scandal and it necessitates public response. 

Celina, you are a Catholic. You are receiving the Body. Blood, Soul and Divinity of Our Lord Jesus Christ in the Holy Eucharist. You are doing this whilst in a state of dissent from Catholic teaching which is objectively mortally sinful. You are committing public scandal in accord with Canon 915. 

Celina, what does St. Paul say to us in 1 Corinthians 11:27?

"Whoever, therefore, eats the bread or drinks the cup of the Lord in an unworthy manner will be answerable for the body and blood of the Lord. Examine yourselves, and only then eat of the bread and drink of the cup. For all who eat and drink without discerning the body, eat and drink judgment against themselves."

As a Catholic, you must know this in order to be aware of the consequences. With ContraDiction and now this post, you have been made aware. If your priest had not told you and refuses to tell you, he will see your damned face and soul in Hell because he will be there too.  That quote came from a Catholic priest who told his own parishioner the truth, lest he see her face to face there.

How harsh is that, eh?

The Prophet Ezekiel made it abundantly clear in 3:18. 

"If, when I say to the wicked, Thou shalt surely die: thou declare it not to him, nor speak to him, that he may be converted from his wicked way, and live: the same wicked man shall die in his iniquity, but I will require his blood at thy hand."

Celina, you have now been told publicly by two Catholic brothers. It is time for you and all Catholic Members of Parliament to decide. Do you wish to gain the whole world, or at least the sink hole on the Rideau in exchange for your immortal soul? Is Justin Trudeau worth it?

As for Justin Trudeau, the psalm is most appropriate. 

"May his days be few;  may another seize his position."

Read ContraDiction's take on this.

http://signofcontradiction.blogspot.ca/2016/06/pseudocatholic-liberal-mp-celina-caesar.html

Pseudo-Catholic Liberal MP Celina Caesar-Chavannes Receiving Communion At Whitby Parish

Allow me to clarify: A pro-abortion, pro-sodomy, pro-same sex marriage, and pro-euthanasia “Catholic” politician in our Archdiocese regularly attends Mass and is served the Sacred Body and Blood of Jesus Christ by the parish priest.

So what’s the big deal? A majority of Canada’s Catholics qualify for the label pseudo-catholic and yet they are still offered Holy Communion in their parishes (it’s still sacrilege though).

God help us. Canada's Supreme Court approves sex with animals as long as it is not penetration!

I'm sorry friends for the headline.

Yes, that is right.

You stupid Canadians. Your glorious "Charter of Rights and Freedoms" of Pierre Elliot Trudeau is now a raging fascist insanity. 

Are you happy now idiots?

Canada's Supreme Court has just legalised sex with animals as long as it's not "penetration." You know, like Bill Clinton's definition of non sexual relations with that 22 year old intern? 

These same  so-called "Justices," many of them appointed by the neo-conservative, Stephen Harper, have given this to us following on the heels of legalised prostitution and euthanasia. We remain one of the only countries in the world without any law restricting or regulating them murder of babies in the womb.

Canada, be damned!

I hate my country. It is no longer mine. It is not my home, I only rent here. 

Truly, we are doomed.

WARNING: Content of this story may offend some readers. The story deals with bestiality.​

The Supreme Court of Canada has upheld the acquittal of a British Columbia man in a decision that defines the crime of bestiality as penetration involving a person and animal.

The B.C. man was found guilty three years ago of 13 counts arising from years of sexual molestation of his two step-daughters.

The charges included one count of bestiality under the Criminal Code, stemming from sexual activity involving the older girl and the family dog.

The man successfully challenged the bestiality conviction in the B.C. Court of Appeal based on the fact the activity did not involve penetration. (The man cannot be named to protect the identities of the step-daughters.)

• Bill banning import and sale of cat and dog fur to be debated

• Members of Parliament spar over animal welfare Bill C-246

• Toronto MP defends efforts to update animal-protection laws

In a 6-1 decision Thursday, the Supreme Court affirmed that ruling, rejecting the notion bestiality is an offence encompassing sexual activity of any kind between a person and an animal.

At issue was whether updates to the Criminal Code in 1955 and 1988 altered the meaning of the crime.

"The term 'bestiality' has a well-established legal meaning and refers to sexual intercourse between a human and an animal. Penetration has always been understood to be an essential element of bestiality," wrote Justice Thomas Cromwell on behalf of the court.

"Parliament may wish to consider whether the present provisions adequately protect children and animals. But it is for Parliament, not the courts, to expand the scope of criminal liability for this ancient offence."

In a dissenting opinion, Justice Rosalie Abella said she had a great deal of difficulty accepting that in modernizing amendments to the Criminal Code, "Parliament forgot to bring the offence out of the Middle Ages."

A good case can be made that by 1988, Parliament intended, or at the very least assumed, that penetration was irrelevant, she wrote.

© The Canadian Press, 2016 

• 
  

I know you are but what am I?

Our friends at Rorate Caeli have juxtaposed Saint John Paul II's, Veritatis Splendor with Francis' daily ditty from the Chapel at the St. Martha Motel (apologise to the Saint and my mother, Martha!)

As with the great Denzinger-Bergoglio; the best way to oppose Francis, and get it through to our Catholic brothers and sisters that something is terribly wrong with this Pope and his thinking, is to directly compare what he says with what came before him.

Jorge Bergoglio is a man, he is not a god. Get off of this papolatry treadmill that some are
on. We have every right to oppose him when he says that which contradicts the Magisterium of teaching which came before. In fact, we have a duty to oppose him for our own sake and for the sake of others.

Today, he called clarity on the Law and the choice between good and evil as "heretical." This Pope believes in situational ethics. He has now dared in his arrogance to call those who follow  Our Blessed Lord's statement, "if you love me, keep my commandments," as heretics.

Well, we know what that is, don't we?

From Rorate:

(1) Either John Paul II and all the Popes who came before him are right, by emphasizing the "absoluteness" of the Church's moral law and by classifying as a "very serious error" that the doctrine of the Church is only an "ideal"...

It would be a very serious error to conclude... that the Church's teaching is essentially only an "ideal" which must then be adapted, proportioned, graduated to the so-called concrete possibilities of man, according to a "balancing of the goods in question".

But what are the "concrete possibilities of man"? And of which man are we speaking? Of man dominated by lust or of man redeemed by Christ? This is what is at stake: the reality of Christ's redemption. Christ has redeemed us! This means that he has given us the possibility of realizing the entire truth of our being; he has set our freedom free from the domination of concupiscence. And if redeemed man still sins, this is not due to an imperfection of Christ's redemptive act, but to man's will not to avail himself of the grace which flows from that act....

In this context, appropriate allowance is made both for God's mercy towards the sinner who converts and for the understanding of human weakness. Such understanding never means compromising and falsifying the standard of good and evil in order to adapt it to particular circumstances. It is quite human for the sinner to acknowledge his weakness and to ask mercy for his failings; what is unacceptable is the attitude of one who makes his own weakness the criterion of the truth about the good, so that he can feel self-justified, without even the need to have recourse to God and his mercy. An attitude of this sort corrupts the morality of society as a whole, since it encourages doubt about the objectivity of the moral law in general and a rejection of the absoluteness of moral prohibitions regarding specific human acts, and it ends up by confusing all judgments about values.

John Paul II in Veritatis Splendor of August 6, 1993

***

...or (2) Francis is right, by qualifying as "heretical" a rejection of the "Doctrine of the Ideal" as well as any affirmation of the absoluteness of moral prohibitions ('or this or nothing').

“This (is the) healthy realism of the Catholic Church: the Church never teaches us ‘or this or that.’ That is not Catholic. The Church says to us: ‘this and that.’ ‘Strive for perfectionism: reconcile with your brother. Do not insult him. Love him. And if there is a problem, at the very least settle your differences so that war doesn’t break out.’ This (is) the healthy realism of Catholicism. It is not Catholic (to say) ‘or this or nothing:’ This is not Catholic, this is heretical. Jesus always knows how to accompany us, he gives us the ideal, he accompanies us towards the ideal, He frees us from the chains of the laws' rigidity and tells us: ‘But do that up to the point that you are capable.’ And he understands us very well. He is our Lord and this is what he teaches us.”

Francis' Homily at Santa Marta on June 9, 2016

Jean Vanier supports Canada's Euthanasia law - has the temerity to cite Pope Francis to justify it!

BREAKING: 

In a shameful, scandalous, and blatant betrayal of his faith, his country, and his parents, Georges and Pauline Vanier, Jean Vanier, the founder of L'Arche and internationally known Catholic humanitarian has come out in support of euthanasia.

Often exaggeratingly and ridiculously called "a living saint," Vanier was interviewed by the CBC on the matter and confirmed his views in writing to LifeSiteNews.

Jean Vanier is proof that the Catholic Church in Canada is in rapid collapse. The L'Arche Hymn will never be sung by any choir under my direction or myself again. 

Jean, feel free to take the needle but remember what will come a moment later. 

May God's judgement be swift.

https://www.lifesitenews.com/opinion/jean-vanier-supports-legalizing-assisted-suicide-in-cbc-interview

Jean Vanier's full statement to LifeSiteNews on assisted suicide
English translation
I stand by everything that I have said. The main thing is in any case to support life and to avoid all situations of suicide that originate in a situation of depression and solitude. No Jean, it is to "avoid all situations of suicide" period! 
My sister Therese, who was a palliative care doctor, has always said that 97 percent of people die fully conscious and without suffering. For the remaining 3 percent, they worked at finding a way to administer medication so that all could die without suffering. Nobody needs to suffer unnecessarily. Palliative care is what is needed, as you advocate. Sometimes, those drugs administered to ease pain, may hasten death as a secondary effect.
If the correct sedative or medication has not been found one cannot oblige someone to live through an unrelenting agony. But one cannot advocate that in the absence of that "sedative or medication" one can administer a drug to "kill" the patient. Why are you not abundantly clear on this?
One must not take part of a series of remarks and take them out of context. The most important thing is to accompany people with a competent doctor and above all if possible involved in palliative care. What is the context of your remarks? It seems pretty clear.
Pope Francis continues to tell us that everything cannot be regulated by a law and there are always exceptions. So, you join the Pope in celebrating ambiguity? "Let your yes be yes and your no be no!"

Alice in “Amoris Laetitia” Land

From Sandro Magister:

http://chiesa.espresso.repubblica.it/articolo/1351311?eng=y

The dazzling critique by an Australian scholar on the post-synodal exhortation. “We have lost all foothold, and fallen like Alice into a parallel universe, where nothing is quite what it seems to be”

by Sandro Magister

ROME, June 7, 2016 - Keep an eye on the author of the volume above, the first critical version of a masterpiece by Saint Basil the Great lost in the original Greek but come down to us in an ancient Syrian version attested to in five manuscripts, published two years ago by the historical publisher Brill, active in Holland since the 17th century.

The author is Anna M. Silvas, one of the world’s most renowned scholars of the Fathers of the Church, especially Eastern. She belongs to the Greek Catholic Church of Romania, and lives in Armindale, Australia, in New South Wales.

She teaches at the University of New England and at the Australian Catholic University. Her main fields of study are the Cappadocian Fathers – Basil, Gregory Nazianzen, Gregory of Nyssa –, the development of monasticism, female asceticism in early Christianity and in the Middle Ages.

She also gives courses on marriage, family, and sexuality in the Catholic tradition at the Pontifical John Paul II Institute on Marriage and Family in Melbourne.

The following is her commentary on the post-synodal apostolic exhortation “Amoris Laetitia,” delivered before a packed crowd with bishops and priests and then published on the website of the Parish of Blessed John Henry Newman in Caulfield North, near Melbourne.

The original text of the commentary is supplemented with footnotes and an epilogue with a passage from Saint Basil, omitted here.

But not another word. The commentary by Anna M. Silvas is a must-read. Brilliant, acute, expert, straightforward. A luminous example of that “parresìa” which is the duty of every baptized person.

Read Anna Silvas' speech at this link:

http://chiesa.espresso.repubblica.it/articolo/1351311?eng=y

Let's all go ta Sveden, ya! Boot vy voud ve meet vit Katoliks?

The Catholic of Sweden are on the real "periphery." Persecuted for centuries by the Lutheran heretics, their cathedrals and churches, stolen! 

The Bishop of Rome will visit Lund to praise Luther and Malmo to kiss the feet of migrant Mohammedans and what the heck, he just found time to meet with Catholics and have a little mess, I mean Mass.

I suggest we all get ready for the asteroids.



http://www.mondayvatican.com/vatican/pope-francis-new-peripheries

Pope Francis: New Peripheries?

by ANDREA GAGLIARDUCCI on 6 GIUGNO 2016 · 1 COMMENT · in VATICAN

Pope Francis' decision to extend by an additional day his visit to Sweden in order to celebrate a Mass with the Swedish Catholic community explains a lot about how decision making in the Domus Sanctae Marthae takes place. And it also shows that there are collaborators around Pope Francis able to intercept certain kinds of sensitive issues.

Pope Francis’ trip to Lund (Sweden) on October 31 for a commemoration of the 500th anniversary of the Protestant Reformation was announced some time back. However, it was immediately noticed that he was planning to stay just one day, with no meeting scheduled with the Catholic community. And just as immediately, the Church in Sweden started working behind the scenes to have the Pope meet with Catholics at least for a Mass. The effort was grounded in the fact the Catholics in Sweden are a real existential periphery – to use Pope Francis’ words – placed as they are in the minority by the increasing wave of secularization that is affecting Sweden.

...

In the end, there would have been a severe papal gaffe if he were not to meet the Catholics of Sweden, who for centuries suffered persecution because of the Lutheran Church, and who now see these two freedoms at risk in their society once again.

Once this argument was won, Pope Francis decided to go. Malmoe is not far from Lund, and is home for many migrants and refugees coming from the Middle East. The Pope will go there after the commemoration in Lund, while Catholics would have preferred it if he had met with them and celebrated Mass with them first, before the joint meeting with Lutherans.

Scripture, Saints, Popes, Doctors, Councils and Documents demolish Pope Francis's Amoris Laetitia

Don't take my word for it.

Read it for yourselves.

And weep!

https://en.denzingerbergoglio.com/it-is-necessary-to-have-a-fraternal-and-attentive-welcome-of-the-baptized-who-have-established-a-new-relationship-of-cohabitation-after-the-failure-of-the-marital-sacrament-in-fact-these-persons-are/#Francis

Any priest or bishops promoting or justifying this thing, Amoris Laetitia, is flogging a dead horse.

I ask any of them, or you to leave a comment. Amoris Laetitia and Pope Francis have opened the door for confusion and error - that cannot be denied. What also cannot be denied is that history has already condemned the openings in this exhortation. The evidence is at the link to Denzinger-Bergoglio.

Go along with it at your own risk.

Bishop Kevin Farrell! You say, bloggers are spreading "hate." Well, Your gay-priest-friendly Excellency, what are you spreading?

Before we get to Bishop Farrell's calumny in defense the latest Rosicanism, let us take a little look at a few things, shall we?

Why Would Dallas Bishop Kevin Farrell Appoint Known Members of Homosexual Priest Network, "St. Sebastian's Angel's" as pastors of St. Michael's in McKinney, Texas?

Good question, from the good people who did such enormous work at the now concluded initiative RomanCatholicFaithful, exposing the hidden network of active homosexuals in the priesthood. 

What else?

Well there is this from his own web page:

This is in complete contradiction to the teaching of the Church in regards to the admittance of homosexual men to the Catholic priesthood. It is also a complete and utter exaggeration  and distortion of the words of Pope Francis. 

The facts on admitting men with homosexual tendencies to the priesthood is quite clear:

In the light of such teaching, this Dicastery, in accord with the Congregation for Divine Worship and the Discipline of the Sacraments, believes it necessary to state clearly that the Church, while profoundly respecting the persons in question[9], cannot admit to the seminary or to holy orders those who practise homosexuality, present deep-seated homosexual tendencies or support the so-called "gay culture"[10].
http://www.vatican.va/roman_curia/congregations/ccatheduc/documents/rc_con_ccatheduc_doc_20051104_istruzione_en.html

So, bloggers are accused of spreading "hate," the word of choice for the sodomite Marxist cultural brigade.

What is Kevin Farrell spreading?

Bishop Kevin Farrell of the Diocese of Dallas has publicly sinned and should make a public apology. Instead of denouncing homosexuality in the clergy, instead of denouncing the crime of abortion, instead of pointing out the evil of contraception, instead of preaching doctrine and opposing the scourge of heresy that is rampant in the Church - Farrell decides to launch an attack on Catholic bloggers.
http://torontocatholicwitness.blogspot.ca/2016/06/bishop-kevin-farrell-publicly-commits.html

Who judges Francis? History, the Magisterium and The Denzinger-Bergoglio

It was a few  months ago that I discovered The Denzinger Bergoglio and, shortly thereafter, put a link to this most necessary resource on the blog list, to the left below.

It began as work of Spanish priests and today is the one-year anniversary of its English version.  The writers are a network of diocesan priests, by necessity, anonymous; and, they have the support of their bishops.

I urge you to consult and study the work of Denzinger-Bergoglio. It will be a reference point for years to come.

Let's look at just one post.

Many will accuse bloggers of being against Francis or manipulating what he says, as we report and comment on what he says and does. Where is the proof? of our accusations? Who are you to judge the Pope? they will say and write. Well, who does judge Francis? 

Yet, there is a post which is a reference point for all about "Who Judges Francis?"

It is the very Magisterium itself!

https://en.denzingerbergoglio.com/who-judges-francis/

Two thousand years of Holy Scripture, Councils, Saints, Doctors, Synods, Documents...all of it, judges Francis.

Don't blame us.

Blame the Magisterium. 

https://newsitedenz.files.wordpress.com/2016/01/denzinger-bergoglio_english-pdf.zip

Bishop Athanasius Schneider issues public letter on Amoris Laetitia interpretation

Will anyone else join this Bishop and the few others who have had the courage to state the reality that we are faced with as faithful Catholics?

http://remnantnewspaper.com/web/index.php/articles/item/2558-bishop-athanasius-schneider-replies-to-the-remnant-s-open-letter-on-amoris-laetitia

Dear Mr. Christopher A. Ferrara:

On May 9, 2016 you published on “The Remnant” website an open letter to me regarding the question of the Apostolic Exhortation “Amoris laetitia”.

As a bishop, I am grateful and at the same time encouraged to receive from a Catholic layman such a clear and beautiful manifestation of the “sensus fidei” regarding the Divine truth on marriage and the moral law.

I am agreeing with your observations as to those expressions in AL (“Amoris laetitia”), and especially in its VIII’s chapter, which are highly ambiguous and misleading. In using our reason and in respecting the proper sense of the words, one can hardly interpret some expressions in AL according to the holy immutable Tradition of the Church.

In AL, there are of course expressions which are obviously in conformity with the Tradition. But that is not what is at issue here. What is at stake are the natural and logical consequences of the ambiguous expressions of AL. Indeed, they contain a real spiritual danger, which will cause doctrinal confusion, a fast and easy spreading of heterodox doctrines concerning marriage and moral law, and also the adoption and consolidation of the praxis of admitting divorced and remarried to Holy Communion, a praxis which will trivialize and profane, as to say, at one blow three sacraments: the sacrament of Marriage, of Penance, and of the Most Holy Eucharist.

In these our dark times, in which Our Beloved Lord seems to sleep in the boat of His Holy Church, all Catholics, beginning from the bishops up to the simplest faithful, who still take seriously their baptismal vows, should with one voice (“una voce”) make a profession of fidelity, enunciating concretely and clearly all those Catholic truths, which are in some expressions of AL undermined or ambiguously disfigured. It would be a kind of a “Credo” of the people of God. AL is clearly a pastoral document (i.e., by its nature of temporal character) and has no claims to be definitive. We have to avoid to “make infallible” every word and gesture of a current Pope. This is contrary to the teaching of Jesus and of the whole Tradition of the Church. Such a totalitarian understanding and application of Papal infallibility is not Catholic, is ultimately worldly, like in a dictatorship; it is against the spirit of the Gospel and of the Fathers of the Church.

Beside the above mentioned possible common profession of fidelity, there should be made to my opinion, by competent scholars of dogmatic and moral theology also a solid analysis of all ambiguous and objectively erroneous expressions in AL. Such a scientific analysis should be made without anger and partiality (“sine ira et studio”) and out of filial deference to the Vicar of Christ.

I am convinced that in later times the Popes will be grateful that there had been concerning voices of some bishops, theologians and laypeople in times of a great confusion. Let us live for the sake of the truth and of the eternity, “pro veritate et aeternitate”!

+ Athanasius Schneider,        

Auxiliary Bishop of the Archdiocese of Saint Mary in Astana