Bergoglio's Maltese Bishops, follow his lead and openly dissent from the Catholic Faith. The proof is here for all to see.

In a stunning report in Osservatore Romano, the Vatican City State's own newspaper, the Bishops of Malta have declared themselves heretics and have placed themselves outside the Holy Catholic Church. There is simply no other way to look at the situation given what they have said.

Below is the head of the Maltese Bishop's Conference, Charles Scicluna. As the video reveals, he sure likes the limelight. A real rock star is the pathetic curse upon the Church, that is this man.

In a statement that will now sanction not only adultery but the open and ongoing sin of sacrilege, the bishops have said that:

“If a separated or divorced person who is living in a new relationship manages, with an informed and enlightened conscience, to acknowledge and believe that he or she are at peace with God, he or she cannot be precluded from participating in the sacraments of Reconciliation and the Eucharist”.

They also state that avoiding sex may be "humanly impossible."

A most interesting statement, no doubt, particularly coming from men who are to be not only celibate, but chaste.

Perhaps some of these Maltese bishops speak from experience, eh?

How about some sodomy and play with the girlie-boy down the lane?  Perhaps some Saturday night pornography followed by a flurry of self-abuse?  Maybe the immoral, but natural thing of bedding down for a night with an actual woman! Pfft, a woman - what would these effeminates know about a woman!

After all, if the Bishops of Malta think that it is "humanly impossible" to avoid sexual sin, then they must be speaking from experience and that includes this pathetic Judas, Scicluna!

Here's the whole lot of them, the whole disgraceful mess of apostates!

UPDATE: In spite of complaints from a few, I insist on listing all Maltese bishops here, even those who are Nuncios and who have nothing directly to do with the two bishops from Malta, who have undertaken this. The reason is clear, they must rebuke their brothers!

• Bishop Joseph Alessandro, O.F.M. Cap., Bishop of Garissa, Kenya
• Bishop Peter Baldacchino, Auxiliary Bishop of Miami, Florida, USA
• Bishop Emanuel Barbara, O.F.M. Cap., Bishop of Malindi, Kenya
• Bishop José Bonello, O.F.M., Bishop of Juticalpa, Honduras
• Bishop George Bugeja, O.F.M., Coadjutor Vicar Apostolic of Tripoli, Libya
• Bishop Roberto Camilleri Azzopardi, O.F.M., Bishop of Comayagua, Honduras
• Archbishop Tommaso Caputo, Prelate of Pompei o Beatissima Vergine Maria del Santissimo Rosario, Italy
• Archbishop Mario Roberto Cassari, Apostolic Nuncio to Malta
• Archbishop Aldo Cavalli, Apostolic Nuncio to Netherlands
• Archbishop Pier Luigi Celata, Vice-Chamberlain Emeritus of the Apostolic Chamber, Roman Curia
• Bishop Vicente Costa, Bishop of Jundiaí, Sao Paulo, Brazil
• Archbishop Paul Cremona, O.P., Archbishop Emeritus of Malta
• Bishop Paul Darmanin, O.F.M. Cap., Bishop Emeritus of Garissa, Kenya
• Archbishop Félix del Blanco Prieto, Almoner Emeritus of the Office of Papal Charities, Roman Curia
• Bishop Walter Michael Ebejer, O.P., Bishop Emeritus of União da Vitória, Parana, Brazil
• Archbishop George Anthony Frendo, O.P., Archbishop of Tiranë-Durrës, Albania
• Archbishop Luigi Gatti, Apostolic Nuncio Emeritus to Greece
• Bishop Mario Grech, Bishop of Gozo
• Prospero (Stanley) Cardinal Grech, O.S.A., Cardinal-Deacon of Santa Maria Goretti
• Bishop Sylvester Carmel Magro, O.F.M., Vicar Apostolic Emeritus of Benghazi, Libya
• Bishop Francis George Adeodatus Micallef, O.C.D., Vicar Apostolic Emeritus of Kuwait
• Archbishop Charles Jude Scicluna, Archbishop of Malta
• Archbishop Joseph Spiteri, Apostolic Nuncio to Côte d’Ivoire
• Father Leo White, O.F.M. Cap., Prefect Emeritus of Garissa, Kenya
• Bishop Carmelo Zammit, Bishop of Gibraltar

John Paul II and Benedict XVI reaffirmed the Church’s perennial teaching that divorced and remarried Catholics cannot receive Communion, except possibly when they endeavour to live “as brother and sister."

The fact that this is happening can be lead straight to the feet of Jorge Bergoglio. There can be no holding back now of the four Cardinals, and more still, who are prepared to challenge this wrong-headed, and faithless, scandalous, malefactor on the Seat of Peter. This is his fault. This is Bergoglio's doing. 

Perhaps, just perhaps, the Maltese bishops have done us a big favour. This is going to blow up and put Bergoglio in the corner where he belongs.  Jorge Bergoglio must be held to account for his error and the heretical and sacrilegious  permission in Amoris Laetitia. He did it. This is his work and it must be denounced.

The Pope must recant and repent. If he dies before doing this, his judgement with Our Lord Jesus Christ will be severe.

Read the rest at:

http://www.catholicherald.co.uk/news/2017/01/13/maltas-bishops-tell-the-remarried-take-communion-if-you-feel-at-peace-with-god/

UPDATED:

Dr. Edward Peters, the preeminent Canon Lawyer has already commented. He states that this is even worse than the Argentine statement which left room for "orthodoxy." 

https://canonlawblog.wordpress.com/2017/01/13/the-maltese-disaster/

1. The Maltese bishops have fallen completely for the canonically and ecclesiologically false view that an individual’s assessment of his or her own readiness to receive holy Communion (see c. 916) controls a minister’s decision to administer the sacrament (see c. 915). In Malta now, anyone who approaches for the sacraments should be recognized as being “at peace with God”. Objective evidence to the contrary is simply no longer relevant. Canon 916 is thus eviscerated, Canon 915 is effectively repudiated.

2. The Maltese bishops do not seem to know what the word “conjugal” means. They think that non-married people can practice “conjugal” virtues and that they can decide about whether to engage in “conjugal” acts. Nonsense and, coming from bishops, inexcusable nonsense at that. Non-married people can have sex, of course, but Catholic pastoral integrity does not hold such sexual acts on par with the physically identical, but truly conjugal, acts as performed by married persons.

3. The Maltese bishops, by extending their document to the sacrament of Reconciliation, have basically instructed their priests not to withhold absolution from divorced-and-remarried Catholics who refuse to repent of their “public and permanent adultery” (CCC 2384) even to the point of abstaining from sexual (nb: sexual not “conjugal”) relations. Incredibly, such a directive raises the specter of green-lighting sacrilegious confessions and the commission of solicitation in confession. No priest should want either on his conscience, let alone both.

4. The Maltese bishops even managed to take swipes at Baptism and Confirmation by opening the door to divorced-and-remarried Catholics serving as godparents contrary to the expectations of Canon 874 § 1, 3º. See CLSA New Comm (2001) 1062-1063.

Today, the Baptism of the Lord

Today, the Octave Day of Epiphany, January 13, it is the Commemoration of the Baptism of the Lord. In the modernist calendar and the nervously disordered liturgy it falls, as you know, on the Sunday after Epiphany or Monday, should Epiphany fall on Sunday or is transferred to It, as it was this past week. The oddity is that in Rome, Epiphany is on January 6 and while much of the rest of the world was on Epiphany "Sunday," Rome was celebrating the Baptism of the Lord. As I wrote, the nervous disordered liturgy.

The Second Sunday after Pentecost, upcoming in the proper calendar and rite, or the Second Sunday in Ordinary Time in Year C of that same disordered liturgy, (I cannot recall the current Year as I've not been to a nervous disordered rite in many months) it is Cana Sunday, when the Gospel read is that of the Wedding Feast of Cana and the changing by our Lord of the water into wine. It is casually plugged in to Year C, whist A and B are different, thus changing the whole liturgical understanding of these days and depriving the faithful and clergy of the deep spiritual richness of the liturgical season.

What do these all have to do with each other?

Up until the sinister Annibale Bugnini had his way with Pius XII, Epiphany had its own Octave. While it was killed off in 1955, remnants of it survived in the 1962 Roman Missal and actually survive in the Lectionary and Responsorial Psalm of the 1970 Missal. It was a grievous error to do away with it over 60 years ago. It should be brought back for both Missals, or at least until the nervous disorder is abrogated, and anathematised, as it will be. In our home, however, we have been celebrating the Octave, as we have been reading the Divine Office of Matins, Lauds and Vespers according to the Divino Afflatu, the pre-Bugnini and uncontaminated Office as reformed by Pope St. Pius X. It is available at the tab above "Divine Office 1962."

Further, the early Fathers of the Church believed that the Epiphany, -- the singular visit of the Wise Men, and, the Baptism of the Lord and the Wedding Feast at Cana occurred on the same date in the respective years of Our Lord's life. The antiphons throughout the week recall this daily.

I wish to point you now from here to a fine blog called The New Theological Movement. 

It will explain it all and hopefully, bring you to a greater understanding on what was lost in our faith and culture and what we must struggle to restore, in spite of the Vatican and the malefactors who undermined our Faith, the Liturgy and the Culture. This post, at A Catholic Life, looks at some others aspects of the Octaves. 

When I was a child, my mother always referred to the Epiphany as "Little Christmas." It has always been considered a continuation of Christmas.

Just one more reason to abandon the Novus Ordo and its corrupted calendar and return to the tradition and faith of our fathers. 

Pope Bergoglio exercises "immediate control" over all Catholics?

VATICAN CITY (CNS) -- The leadership of the Order of Malta denied the legality of a Vatican investigation into the forced resignation of the group's former grand chancellor, but the commission established by Pope Francis said it "is completely legitimate and authorized" to investigate the matter and inform the pope.

According to one of the legal notes prepared for the commission, the pope's right to be informed of the circumstances surrounding the removal of Albrecht Freiherr von Boeselager relates "to the authority he exercises directly and immediately over all baptized faithful, whether lay or clerical."

http://www.catholicnews.com/services/englishnews/2017/order-of-malta-questions-legitimacy-of-commission-established-by-pope.cfm

"Direct and immediate authority?" which Bergoglio possesses "over all baptised faithful?

What kind of clericalist, fascist idiot would actually write such preposterous thing to the any Catholic, group or individual without clarifying that it begins and ends with doctrine and discipline?

The matter with the Knights of Malta is administrative, not doctrinal. The Pope has no business interfering. Let Rome dare say that "we established" and approved Knight of Malta charter. Well, the Italian Republic approved the treaty creating the Vatican City State too. 

Shall Italy revoke it? 

For more on the Knights of Malta, I direct you to this essay by Dr. Roberto de Mattei, translated at The Eponymous Flower.

A reader has brought to my attention, this, from Denzinger:

If anyone thus speaks, that the Roman Pontiff has only the office of inspection or direction, but not the full and supreme power of jurisdiction over the universal Church, not only in things which pertain to faith and morals, but also in those which pertain to the discipline and government of the Church spread over the whole world; or, that he possesses only the more important parts, but not the whole plenitude of this supreme power; or that this power of his is not ordinary and immediate, or over the churches altogether and individually, and over the pastors and the faithful altogether and individually: let him be anathema.” (Denzinger 1831)

Well then, careful my fellow Catholics, this Peronist Fascist will soon be declaring his authority over your property and your pension or he will excommunicate you.

These malefactors are nothing more than a bunch of coprophiliacs in clerical dress, if you ask me. 

"Anathema?" Yeah, right. They love the law, these Roman hypocrites - they interpret it for their friends and they apply it to their enemies when it suits them.

Gosh, and he was such a cute kid, too.

The Peronist Pope - Bergoglio ignores his curial experts and his collegial bishops

All the talk about "collegiality" has gone out the window with Jorge Bergoglio. Never would Pope John Paul II or Benedict XVI have ever acted with the near maniacal manner in which this occupant of the Seat of Peter presides over the Holy Catholic Church.

Edward Pentin, truly the most well-informed and respected Vatican journalist today, has reported on Cardinal Gerhard Müller’s recent interview on German television. The Cardinal seems shows his own weakness in being prepared to confront the errors of Bergoglio as is revealed by some of his statements:

His remarks also come after it has emerged the CDF had clear misgivings about the document before it was published — concerns which were never heeded. One informed official recently told the Register that a CDF committee that reviewed a draft of Amoris Laetitia raised “similar” dubia to those of the four cardinals. Those dubia formed part of the CDF’s 20 pages of corrections, first reported by Jean-Marie Genois in Le Figaro on April 7, the eve of the publication of the document.

Another senior official went further, revealing to the Register last week that Cardinal Müller had told him personally that the CDF “had submitted many, many corrections, and not one of the corrections was accepted”. He added that what the cardinal states in the interview “is exactly the contradictory of everything which he has said to me on the matter until now” and he had the “impression of someone who was not speaking for himself but repeating what someone else had told him to say.”

Not only has Bergoglio and the minions surrounding him ignored the Curial department charged with ensuring doctrinal orthodoxy but they he has ignored up to thirty Cardinals and numerous National Conferences of Bishops who have raised legitimate concerns about the matters contained in Amoris Laetitia.

A significant number of episcopal conferences around the world have expressed their concerns to the Pope, the Register has learned, and like the four cardinals, have received no response. Also before the document was published, 30 cardinals, having seen an advance draft of the apostolic exhortation, wrote to the Pope expressing their reservations, especially on the issue of communion for remarried divorcees, warning that the document would weaken the three essential sacraments of the Church: the Eucharist, marriage, and confession. The Pope never responded to that letter either, a Vatican source told the Register.

Bergoglio's ignoring of both will allow history to declare him "illegitimate."

May that history be written soon.

Jorge Bergoglio: The Great Hypocrite and Pervert Protector

Why more and more priests can’t stand Pope Francis

He has been pigeonholed as fearless reformer, but questions are arising about his judgment

By Damian Thompson

On 2 January, the Vatican published a letter from Pope Francis to the world’s bishops in which he reminded them that they must show ‘zero tolerance’ towards child abuse. The next day, the American Week magazine published an article that told the story of ‘Don Mercedes’ — Fr Mauro Inzoli, an Italian priest with a passion for expensive cars and underage boys.

In 2012, Pope Benedict stripped Inzoli of his priestly faculties, effectively defrocking him. In 2014, however, they were restored to him — by Pope Francis, who warned him to stay away from minors.

Then, finally, the Italian civil authorities caught up with this serial groper of teenagers in the confessional. Last summer Inzoli was sentenced to four years and nine months in jail for paedophile offences. The Vatican, under ‘zero-tolerance’ Francis, refused to supply evidence that prosecutors wanted.

If Pope Benedict XVI had displayed such a hypocritical attitude towards a clerical child abuser, the roof would have fallen in on him: he’d have been driven out of office instead of resigning.

...

He is not, however, their instrument. In the words of a Vatican observer who held an important position in Rome for many years, ‘He hasn’t taken on the old progressive mantle so much as created his own personality cult.’ Theological niceties bore him. Personal loyalty obsesses him — ‘and if the cardinal electors had done due diligence they would have discovered that he was an extraordinarily divisive figure among the Argentinian Jesuits’.

...

Read the rest at:

http://www.spectator.co.uk/2017/01/why-more-and-more-priests-cant-stand-pope-francis/

Bergoglian Barbarians at the gates of Rome!

A beautiful tradition in Rome has been the extension of the Christmas season until Candlemas on February 2, the Feast of the Presentation of the Lord or the Purification of Mary. In the Fox and Vox homestead, I assure you, the tree is up and well watered, we cut it ourselves in early December and left it in water outside until the 23rd of December, the Mangers are lovingly displayed and all the outside lights still glow on the bushes. They will remain until we come home from church on Candlemas. Since we read the Divine Office according to the pre-1955 Divino Afflatu, we are still basking in the glow of the Octave of Epiphany. What a tragic loss began in that year when Annibale Bugnini began taking advantage of the trust of an every weakening Pius XII and the destruction of the liturgy began.

Though the official liturgical end of Christmas in the Nervous Disordered modernist liturgy, the "banal" and "on the spot product" of deformed Catholic minds, is the end of Vespers of the Baptism of the Lord, the ancient tradition in St. Peter's Square has always been to maintain the Nativity and Christmas Tree until Candlemas.

That ended today.

Barbarians at the gates of Rome.

Will Pope Bergoglio undermine Summorum Pontificum?

On his blog, Settimo Cielo, Sandro Magister today reveals some of the machinations and the identities behind the demand by Bergoglio to terminate certain priests in the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith.

http://magister.blogautore.espresso.repubblica.it/2017/01/11/a-firing-a-demolition-behold-the-new-curia/?refresh_ce

Magister goes on to confirm a fear that on the target list next for Pope Bergoglio, through his appointments to the Congregation for Divine Liturgy and Discipline of the Sacraments, is Liturgiam Authenticam.

Want some more?

It is believed that he will undermine Summorum Pontificum. 

Let him try.

I guarantee you this, Father Bergoglio, try it and it will be your Waterloo!

Bergoglio, Schönborn and Spadaro - the Fascist-Masonic Junta that demand you submit!

Some make the mistake, often intentionally, that Islam means "peace." It does not. It means submission. The same false religion that spawns such submission is now dominant in our the Church of Christ under the Peronist thug now sitting in the Chair of Peter. Aided and abetted by his mathematically and theologically deficient Jesuitical sycophant. Antonio Spadaro, who is so tough, he blocks people on Twitter, these three amigos, which include the official interpreter of Amoris Laetitia,  Cardinal Schönborn, are ramping up the demand that Catholics submit to their pathetical and filthy heresies.

Submission. 

They want you to believe that the God who created the precise mathematical clock of the universe has lied to you for 2000 years. These men are traitors of Jesus Christ and His Church. Jorge Bergoglio must be resisted and confronted to his face that faithful Catholics will not accept the heretical teachings articulated in Amoris Laetitia and have had enough of his pathetic and near daily insults to the Faith and the faithful.

It is incumbent upon faithful Catholics to resist these men, including Bergoglio. It is absolutely necessary that we do not become silent but in fact, ensure that each of these men know that we resist, that we will continue to resist, we will do it in our lives and families, we will do it our conversations with other Catholics and we will do it on blogs and social media. We will make it abundantly clear to each of them that they will not succeed in this attempt to undermine the Faith. They may betray Christ and His Church, we will not. 

Note that this will make them very, very, very angry and they will come at you and at me. Let them, let them expose themselves for what they are. 

I direct you to this essay by Hilary White on OnePeterFive. It is a must read and deadly accurate assessment of that which we face and must face up to.

http://www.onepeterfive.com/many-fingers-francis-holding-now-amoris-laetitia-submission/

Oh, and a message for Tony Spadaro,Tommy Rosica, Kevin Farrell and the rest of you; you can block on Twitter but it's very easy to take out a second account to follow you and as long as one does not comment or link to those you might have blocked, we can still see your Tweets and PrintScreen them. You're not that smart.

Paul of Tarsus or Bergoglio of Buenos Aires

Reading Matins this morning, according to Divino Afflatu for the Fifth Day in the Octave of Epiphany (done away with as an Octave in 1955), we read from the Letter of St. Paul to the Corinthians in three parts. Rather than use the translation from Matins, from the Douay, I will instead use that of the New Revised Standard Version - Catholic Edition. This will then make obvious in the most current way, how clear St. Paul is:

1 Corinthians 5:1-11 New Revised Standard Version Catholic Edition (NRSVCE)

Sexual Immorality Defiles the Church

5 It is actually reported that there is sexual immorality (the Douay refers to "fornication," the NRSV-CE uses an even broader term with "sexual immorality") among you, and of a kind that is not found even among pagans; for a man is living with his father’s wife. 2 And you are arrogant! Should you not rather have mourned, so that he who has done this would have been removed from among you?

3 For though absent in body, I am present in spirit; and as if present I have already pronounced judgement 4 in the name of the Lord Jesus on the man who has done such a thing. When you are assembled, and my spirit is present with the power of our Lord Jesus, 5 you are to hand this man over to Satan for the destruction of the flesh, so that his spirit may be saved in the day of the Lord.6 Your boasting is not a good thing. Do you not know that a little yeast leavens the whole batch of dough? 7 Clean out the old yeast so that you may be a new batch, as you really are unleavened. For our paschal lamb, Christ, has been sacrificed. 8 Therefore, let us celebrate the festival, not with the old yeast, the yeast of malice and evil, but with the unleavened bread of sincerity and truth.

Sexual Immorality Must Be Judged

9 I wrote to you in my letter not to associate with sexually immoral persons— 10 not at all meaning the immoral of this world, or the greedy and robbers, or idolaters, since you would then need to go out of the world. 11 But now I am writing to you not to associate with anyone who bears the name of brother or sister who is sexually immoral or greedy, or is an idolater, reviler, drunkard, or robber. Do not even eat with such a one.

"Do not even eat with such a one!"

So "rigid" was that writer. Such a "self-absorbed, Promethean, neo Pelagian" before Pelagian even existed, was that "tent maker." What a "clericalist" was that student of Gamaliel, considered by the Church to have been a secret Christian and a Saint; in the Martyrology for August 3. His remains are at the Duomo in Pisa, Italy (of "Leaning Tower" fame). Holy Gamaliel is made famous in Acts wherein he says:

S.Gamaliel by Rembrandt

"I advise you: Leave these men alone! Let them go! For if their purpose or activity is of human origin, it will fail. But if it is from God, you will not be able to stop these men; you will only find yourselves fighting against God.’ 

For nearly two-thousand years, we have had the words of St. Paul speak clearly and emphatically to us of how to live, how to be moral and upstanding and faithful to Christ. Clearly, the words of the men to whom Holy Gamaliel referred were doing the work, "from God," 

Now, we have moderns who take a position out of some false mercy that is opposite that of Paul. Such a "doctor," he was, a terrible "detached" man with a "clericalist psychology." It is these men, lead by Bergoglio, who are, "fighting against God."

What then, must Pope Bergoglio think of St. Paul, after he reads that passage, from Scripture, (from something other than Divino Afflatu, of course), considering what he said this morning, at the chapel at the Casa Santa Marta?

"Jesus served the people, He explained things because the people understood well: He was at the service of the people. He had an attitude of a servant, and this gave authority. On the other hand, these doctors of the law that the people… yes, they heard, they respected, but they didn’t feel that they had authority over them; these had a psychology of princes: ‘We are the masters, the princes, and we teach you. Not service: we command, you obey.’ And Jesus never passed Himself off like a prince: He was always the servant of all, and this is what gave Him authority."

"They were detached from the people, they were not close [to them]; Jesus was very close to the people, and this gave authority. Those detached people, these doctors, had a clericalist psychology: they taught with a clericalist authority – that’s clericalism. It is very pleasing to me when I read about the closeness to the people the Blessed Paul VI had; in number 48 of Evangelii nuntiandi one sees the heart of a pastor who is close [to the people]: that’s where you find the authority of the Pope, closeness. First, a servant, of service, of humility: the head is the one who serves, who turns everything upside down, like an iceberg. The summit of the iceberg is seen; Jesus, on the other hand, turns it upside down and the people are on top and he that commands is below, and gives commands from below. Second, closeness."

"On the other hand, this people was not coherent and their personality was divided on the point that Jesus counselled His disciples: ‘But, do what they tell you, but not what they do’: they said one thing and did another. Incoherence. They were incoherent. And the attitude Jesus uses of them so often is hypocritical. And it is understood that one who considers himself a prince, who has a clericalist attitude, who is a hypocrite, doesn’t have authority! He speaks the truth, but without authority. Jesus, on the other hand, who is humble, who is at the service of others, who is close, who does not despise the people, and who is coherent, has authority. And this is the authority that the people of God senses."

If Paul was not speaking with "authority" and the authority of Jesus, then who is he that we should consider what he says? Does Bergoglio place himself above St. Paul? We know what Bergoglio is saying in these little diatribes, he refers to faithful Catholics and faithful prelates who dare to stand up for the Truth of Christ and His Church.

Bergoglio speaks frequently about "senses" and "peripheries" and what the "people of God" think. 

Perhaps it is time for Pope Bergoglio to tell the world what God thinks, and the "Catholic God" specifically! Perhaps its time for Bergoglio to smell a little bit more like the incense of heaven rather than the stench of the sheep. Even the sheep like a bath now and then and sweet smelling things. 

After all, the 39th Psalm (Douay numbering) does tell us that:

3 And he heard my prayers, and brought me out of the pit of misery and the mire of dregs. And he set my feet upon a rock, and directed my steps.

There's a little too much wallowing around in the "mire of dregs" and not enough setting of "feet upon the rock," and directly the steps of those in sexual immorality. Those, and we can name many of them within the ranks of Bergoglio's new Cardinals, will rue the day they choose to "accompany." They'll take on more than the smell of sheep, it will smell more like sulphur.

How ironic, at a time when this Pope decides that we should praise the filthy apostate Luther and his followers who believe in "sola scriptura" that this Pope, chooses to ignore Holy Scripture and instead, places himself above it. 

Given a choice between one or the other, I'll choose Paul of Tarsus over Bergoglio of Buenos Aires!

Müller’s Madness

Gaze on the face of a man who has long since lost his manhood. 

A man who has now become nothing more than hireling. 

Photo courtesy of Eccles

http://www.ncregister.com/blog/edward-pentin/cardinal-muellers-tv-interview-causes-bewilderment

Cardinal Burke interview with The Remnant

MJM: Now, in a private letter of September 5th to the bishops of Buenos Aires, Pope Francis wrote: “There are no other interpretations of Amoris Laetitia,” other than one admitting divorced and remarried Catholics to Holy Communion in some cases. He is so adamant about this, Your Eminence. So, is it even possible for you to envision a scenario whereby you suddenly discover that you've missed something, that the Four Cardinals are misinterpreting it, and that you'd have to concede you were wrong? I mean if that’s not possible, then what is the point of the dubia? Don’t you already know the answers to your five questions?

Cardinal Burke: Certainly we do. But the important thing is that the pastor of the universal Church, in his office as guardian of the truths of the Faith and promoter of the truths of the faith—that he make clear that, yes, he answers these questions in the same way that the Church answers them. And so what he wrote in that letter simply means that this is his personal understanding of the matter. But that letter hardly could be considered an exercise of the papal magisterium. And so, it's a painful situation in which to be involved but we simply have to press forward to clarify the matter.

Full text can be found at:

http://remnantnewspaper.com/web/index.php/articles/item/2980-the-remnant-interview-of-cardinal-raymond-burke

Dr. Jordan Peterson's New Year Letter to the World!

From the Everyday For Life Canada Blog: 

"University of Toronto Professor Jordan Peterson posted, on You Tube at the end of 2016, a very thoughtful and profound message called, "New Year's Letter to the World." The inspiring and soundly  reasoned argument should be heard by all Canadians and people around the world.

If you have not heard of Professor Peterson, you should get to know him. Peterson is that kind of gifted and caring instructor that parents wish their children to have. He's presently caught up in a battle for freedom of speech because he refuses to use gender neutral pronouns. The university, like most other public institutions, is forcing everyone to accept diversity and identity policies. Professor Peterson has had the courage and good sense to oppose the tyranny of political correctness. He's defending the dignity of the human person. It's courageous individuals like Peterson who make me proud to be a Canadian."

Read the rest at: 

http://everydayforlifecanada.blogspot.ca/2017/01/this-is-best-talk-and-resolution-you.html

This Bergoglio thinks Martin Luther is a "Witness to the Gospel?" How does this sit with his Zionist friends? Is Bergoglio really a closet anti-semite?

What a hypocrite this Bergoglio and the heretical and the scandalous minions he has around him continue to be.

Praising the filthy, immoral and heretical apostate, Martin Luther. Do these Romans have no faith left?

"Catholics are now able to hear Luther’s challenge for the Church of today, recognising him as a “witness to the gospel” (From Conflict to Communion 29).

On one hand, he refuses to state that Jews must be converted, defying Our Blessed Lord, and in keeping with his globalist one world, one religion masonic machinations and then he praises the pathetic, monstrous, heretical devilish anti-Semite, Martin Luther as a "witness to the Gospel."

Well, George, which is it?

Can you suck and blow at the same time?

From "On the Jews and Their Lies" Luther deplores Christendom's failure to expel them. Moreover, he proposed, "What shall we Christians do with this rejected and condemned people, the Jews?"

•                    "First, to set fire to their synagogues or schools … This is to be done in honor of our Lord and of Christendom, so that God might see that we are Christians …"

•                    "Second, I advise that their houses also be razed and destroyed.”

•                    "Third, I advise that all their prayer books and Talmudic writings, in which such idolatry, lies, cursing, and blasphemy are taught, be taken from them."            

•                    "Fourth, I advise that their rabbis be forbidden to teach henceforth on pain of loss of life and limb …"            

•                    "Fifth, I advise that safe-conduct on the highways be abolished completely for the Jews. For they have no business in the countryside …"         

•                    "Sixth, I advise that usury be prohibited to them, and that all cash and treasure of silver and gold be taken from them …"      

•                    "Seventh, I recommend putting a flail, an ax, a hoe, a spade, a distaff, or a spindle into the hands of young, strong Jews and Jewesses and letting them earn their bread in the sweat of their brow … But if we are afraid that they might harm us or our wives, children, servants, cattle, etc., … then let us emulate the common sense of other nations such as France, Spain, Bohemia, etc., … then eject them forever from the country …"

What a pathetic group of miscreants and malefactors who have set their hands and filthy lusts on the Church of Christ. To praise a filthy monster such as Luther and at the same time to condemn our Jewish brethren to suffer in darkness away from the Light of Christ.

In my mind, Jorge Bergoglio and his whole band are a bunch of Anti-Semites. The most charitable and loving thing one could do to a Jew is to bring him to fulfillment in their Messiah, Jesus of Nazareth.

The Church must be rid of these antichrists!

Happy New Year to Father Thomas J. Rosica!

Raymond Arroyo and his Posse -- is a Vatican Commission coming?

Will Bergoglio launch an attack on the priests and nuns of the Eternal Word Franciscans as he has the Franciscan Friars of the Immaculate in order to force EWTN and Arroyo to shut up?

More liturgical calendric insanities

A blessed Feast of the Holy Family to one and all, or is that Epiphany, or maybe it's Baptism of the Lord as in Rome.

It all depends where you are. 

Keep talking Cardinal Joseph Tobin - our newest heresiarch opens his mouth and declares it himself!

Perhaps Joey Tobin might want to consider this quote whom some attribute to Mark Twain and others to Abraham Lincoln: “ Better to remain silent and be thought a fool than to speak and to remove all doubt.”

 

To believe in Jesus “is not acceptance of a doctrine or a moral code, but of a person who lives now and is the source of life — and not just on Sunday morning!”                       ... Joseph Tobin, alleged Prince of the Church of Christ

What a blatant, discreditable, detestable liar.

"I and the Father are One" - John 10-30.
 "If you love Me you will keep my Commandments." - John 14:15 

"If you keep my commandments, you shall abide in my love; as I also have kept my Father's commandments, and do abide in his love." John 15:10 

"But if thou wilt enter into life, keep the commandments" - Matt 19:17

... Our Lord Jesus Christ, Son of God and Second Person of the Holy Trinity

Whom do you believe?

To all Catholics - you need to wake up!

What Matt said ...

http://remnantnewspaper.com/web/index.php/articles/item/2974-the-sound-of-neo-catholics-on-gathering-rites-and-hippies

Epiphany 2017 - Post II: The betrayal of Christ by the Jews and the contradiction of Pope Gregory the Great by Pope Bergoglio

How many times has our Bishop of Rome, stated that "proselytism is solemn nonsense," or that "proselytism is a sin." How many times has he prayed in Synagogues and even Mosques, as he did in Africa actually bowing to the vaginal shaped asteroid within the Kabaa in Mecca, how many times has he done that and refused to preach this!

"Concerning this doctrine the Pope of Vatican I, Pius IX, spoke on two different occasions. In an allocution (address to an audience) on December 9th, 1854 he said: We must hold as of the faith, that out of the Apostolic Roman Church there is no salvation; that she is the only ark of safety, and whosoever is not in her perishes in the deluge; we must also, on the other hand, recognize with certainty that those who are invincible in ignorance of the true religion are not guilty for this in the eyes of the Lord. And who would presume to mark out the limits of this ignorance according to the character and diversity of peoples, countries, minds and the rest?

Again, in his encyclical Quanto conficiamur moerore of 10 August, 1863 addressed to the Italian bishops, he said: 

It is known to us and to you that those who are in invincible ignorance of our most holy religion, but who observe carefully the natural law, and the precepts graven by God upon the hearts of all men, and who being disposed to obey God lead an honest and upright life, may, aided by the light of divine grace, attain to eternal life; for God who sees clearly, searches and knows the heart, the disposition, the thoughts and intentions of each, in His supreme mercy and goodness by no means permits that anyone suffer eternal punishment, who has not of his own free will fallen into sin."

From Matins (The Office of Readings in the must abridged modernist Liturgy of the Hours) for the Feast of the Epiphany has these readings from St. Leo the Great (I - III) and two from St. Gregory the Great (VIII and IX):

Reading I: Dearly beloved brethren, rejoice in the Lord; again I say, rejoice. But a few days are past since the solemnity of Christ's Birth, and now the glorious light of His Manifestation is breaking upon us. On that day the Virgin brought Him forth, and on this the world knew Him. The Word made Flesh was pleased to reveal Himself by degrees to those for whom He had come. When Jesus was born He was manifested indeed to the believing, but hidden from His enemies. Already indeed the heavens declared the glory of God, and their sound went out into all lands, when the Herald Angels appeared to tell to the shepherds the glad tidings of a Saviour's Birth; and now the guiding star leadeth the wise men to worship Him, that from the rising of the sun to the going down thereof, the Birth of the true King may be known abroad; that through those wise men the kingdoms of the east might learn the great truth, and the Roman empire remain no more in darkness. 

Reading II: The very cruelty of Herod, when he strove to crush at His birth this King Whom he alone feared, was made a blind means to carry out this dispensation of mercy. While the tyrant with horrid guilt sought to slay the little Child he did not know, amid an indiscriminate slaughter of innocents, his infamous act served to spread wider abroad the heaven-told news of the Birth of the Lord. Thus were these glad tidings loudly proclaimed, both by the novelty of their story, and the iniquity of their enemies. Then was the Saviour borne into Egypt, that nation, of a long time hardened in idolatry, might by the mysterious virtue which went out of Him, even when His presence was unknown, be prepared for the saving light so soon to dawn on them, and might receive the Truth as a wanderer even before they had banished falsehood. 

Reading III: Dearly beloved brethren, we recognize in the wise men who came to worship Christ, the first-fruits of that dispensation to the Gentiles wherein we also are called and enlightened. Let us then keep this Feast with grateful hearts, in thanksgiving for our blessed hope, whereof it doth commemorate the dawn. From that worship paid to the new-born Christ is to be dated the entry of us Gentiles upon our heirship of God and co-heirship with Christ. Since that joyful day the Scriptures which testify of Christ have lain open for us as well as for the Jews. Yea, their blindness rejected that Truth, Which, since that day, hath shed Its bright beams upon all nations. Let all observance, then, be paid to this most sacred day, whereon the Author of our salvation was made manifest, and as the wise men fell down and worshipped Him in the manger, so let us fall down and worship Him enthroned Almighty in heaven. As they also opened their treasures and presented unto Him mystic and symbolic gifts, so let us strive to open our hearts to Him, and offer Him from thence some worthy offering.

Reading VIII: Thus also we remark that afterwards the Redeemer was preached among the Gentiles not by Himself, but by His Apostles, even as, when a little Child, He is shown to them, not by the voice of angels, but merely by the vision of a star. When He Himself had begun to speak He was made known to us by speakers, but when He lay silent in the manger, by that silent testimony in heaven. But whether we consider the signs which accompanied His birth or His death, this thing is wonderful, namely, the hardness of heart of the Jews, who would not believe in Him either for prophesying or for miracles.

Reading IX: All things which He had made, bore witness that their Maker was come. Let me reckon them after the manner of men. The heavens knew that He was God, and sent a star to shine over where He lay. The sea knew it, and bore Him up when He walked upon it. The earth knew it, and quaked when He died. The sun knew it, and was darkened. The rocks and walls knew it, and rent at the hour of His death. Hell knew it, and gave up the dead that were in it. And yet up to this very hour the hearts of the unbelieving Jews will not acknowledge that He to Whom all nature testified is their God, and, being more hardened than the rocks, refuse to be rent by repentance.

On this day, when we celebrate the Manifestation to the Gentiles of Our Lord, let us remember that, notwithstanding the masonic, globalist errors of this and refusal to preach that "there is no salvation outside the Church" except in those cases listed above, the truth is what remains. 

In this modern age, when Jews and infidels and pagans come to the Vatican and with the knowledge available to them; when the Pope refuses to preach the truth; when they refuse to even seek it by "natural law." what hope do either of them have for salvation?

Invincible ignorance for someone in darkest Afghanistan is one thing, I get that; but for those educated, internet connected Jews and Hollywood glitterati who visit with Pope Bergoglio? That is quite another.

What does it say about a Vicar of Christ who bows to Mecca to an idol, an asteroid of all things shaped like a vulva!

What possible prayers could one offer to this?

 Do Jews and Mohammedans not deserve the Truth that they might be saved?