Surrexit Christus!

\

All change is bad - Father F.W. Faber, Cong. Orat.

All change is bad from its very nature. It is full of evil; it unsettles and disturbs; it is full of the world; it is the very spirit of the world; and nothing worse can be said of it. Whenever we are tempted to change any thing, we must not only be quite sure that the old system contained evils, but also that those evils were more numerous and more important, than the ones we must inevitably bring in by change. So cautious, so slow, so meek must we be; so different from those rash and headstrong men who are for changing every thing, though they are not certain that they know all the hidden uses of that which they attack. But change in religion is of all things most perilous. We all of us feel how intimately our spiritual life is bound up in little things, and how change of time and place and company is always putting us wrong. It dislocates our religious habits; our religious ways of thinking, and acting, and speaking. This is the great reason why we should oppose all changes in our ancient Liturgy. It would disturb and unsettle the people." Father F. W. Faber, Cong. Orat. Credo, 1840

It is finished

Gaia Earth Worship Mass to be held in Toronto!

As much as I regret disturbing my own peace or any others on this Holy Day, this cannot be allowed to continue. How much more are we to take?

"The adversary hath spread out his hand upon all her pleasant things: for she hath seen that that the heathen entered into her sanctuary, whom thou didst command that they should not enter into thy congregation. Jerusalem! Jerusalem! Return unto the LORD thy God."

From the the Lamentations of the Prophet Jeremiah; First Nocturn of Tenebrae for Holy Thursday.

From: Vox

Sent: March-28-13 9:58 AM

To: 'archbishop@archtoronto.org'; 'bishop.boissonneau@rogers.com'; 'holyname@rogers.com'

Cc: 'neilm@archtoronto.org'; bills@archtoronto.org

Subject: GAIA EARTH MASS at HOLY NAME CHURCH TORONTO!

Your Eminence, Excellency, Father Morrasse,

“If we do not preach Jesus Christ, we preach the Devil.” These words spoken by our Holy Father Francis have never ringed more true, yet, on this Maundy Thursday, this scandalous matter has been forwarded to me. Regretfully, I must write to you on this Holy Day, rather than all of us being docile to the Spirit, truthfully, the Cult of God must go on and our labours as laity justified in Lumen Gentium and by our Baptism and Confirmation in Christ and the Holy Spirit, must continue.

How is it possible that this abomination of earth worship to a pagan goddess can be allowed to take place in a Catholic Church and promoted on the web page. Now, I note that it does not appear on a page today that I can find, but it is cached in a search as you will see below on the print screen.

Your Eminence, Your Excellency, many times I and others have written and we receive no answers. With all filial respect, I am requesting an answer that this abomination not take place and that the Communications Department will take up its responsibility in these matters not only not to post  but to bring such matters, the actual breaking of the First Commandment to your immediate attention. How much more scandal do the flock of Toronto have to contend with?

Know that you are in the prayers of myself and many these Holy Days.

Yours truly,

www.voxcantor.blogspot.com

bcc. various Catholics in Toronto

Google the cache here.

 (Taken from the Newsletter of the Archdiocese of Toronto)

Apr 3 & Apr 5

Missa Gaia Earth Mass.Holy Name Catholic Church, 71 Gough Avenue, Toronto. 7:30 p.m.The school’s 140-voice choir, musicians and dancers will perform this joyous rhythmic, contemporary work inspired by St. Francis of Assisi, the patron saint of animals and ecology.  It is a musical/spiritual celebration of God’s creation that includes the human voice alongside that of the wolf, whale and loon. An instrumental ensemble featuring present students and alumnae provide an eclectic canvas of traditional, gospel, new age and world music.

Admission is $15.

Fiat, voluntas tua

⁴² Again the second time, he went and prayed, saying: My Father, if this chalice may not pass away, but I must drink it, thy will be done.

⁴³ And he cometh again and findeth them sleeping: for their eyes were heavy.

⁴⁴ And leaving them, he went again: and he prayed the third time, saying the selfsame word.

⁴⁵ Then he cometh to his disciples, and saith to them: Sleep ye now and take your rest; behold the hour is at hand, and the Son of man shall be betrayed into the hands of sinners.

⁴⁶ Rise, let us go: behold he is at hand that will betray me.

Could you not watch on hour with me?

^{Matt. 26:36} Then Jesus came with them into a country place which is called Gethsemani; and he said to his disciples: Sit you here, till I go yonder and pray.

³⁷ And taking with him Peter and the two sons of Zebedee, he began to grow sorrowful and to be sad.

³⁸ Then he saith to them: My soul is sorrowful even unto death: stay you here, and watch with me.

³⁹ And going a little further, he fell upon his face, praying, and saying: My Father, if it be possible, let this chalice pass from me. Nevertheless not as I will, but as thou wilt.

⁴⁰ And he cometh to his disciples, and findeth them asleep, and he saith to Peter: What? Could you not watch one hour with me?

⁴¹ Watch ye, and pray that ye enter not into temptation. The spirit indeed is willing, but the flesh weak.

He was troubled in spirit

^{John 3: 21} When Jesus had said these things, he was troubled in spirit; and he testified, and said: Amen, amen I say to you, one of you shall betray me.

²² The disciples therefore looked one upon another, doubting of whom he spoke.

²³ Now there was leaning on Jesus' bosom one of his disciples, whom Jesus loved.

²⁴ Simon Peter therefore beckoned to him, and said to him: Who is it of whom he speaketh?

²⁵ He therefore, leaning on the breast of Jesus, saith to him: Lord, who is it?

²⁶ Jesus answered: He it is to whom I shall reach bread dipped. And when he had dipped the bread, he gave it to Judas Iscariot, the son of Simon.

²⁷ And after the morsel, Satan entered into him. And Jesus said to him: That which thou dost, do quickly.

²⁸ Now no man at the table knew to what purpose he said this unto him.

²⁹ For some thought, because Judas had the purse, that Jesus had said to him: Buy those things which we have need of for the festival day: or that he should give something to the poor.

³⁰ He therefore having received the morsel, went out immediately. And it was night.

³¹ When he therefore was gone out, Jesus said: Now is the Son of man glorified, and God is glorified in him.

³² If God be glorified in him, God also will glorify him in himself; and immediately will he glorify him.

Mandatum

John 13 Before the festival day of the pasch, Jesus knowing that his hour was come, that he should pass out of this world to the Father: having loved his own who were in the world, he loved them unto the end.

² And when supper was done, (the devil having now put into the heart of Judas Iscariot, the son of Simon, to betray him,)

³ Knowing that the Father had given him all things into his hands, and that he came from God, and goeth to God;

⁴ He riseth from supper, and layeth aside his garments, and having taken a towel, girded himself.

⁵ After that, he putteth water into a basin, and began to wash the feet of the disciples, and to wipe them with the towel wherewith he was girded.

⁶ He cometh therefore to Simon Peter. And Peter saith to him: Lord, dost thou wash my feet?

⁷ Jesus answered, and said to him: What I do thou knowest not now; but thou shalt know hereafter.

⁸ Peter saith to him: Thou shalt never wash my feet. Jesus answered him: If I wash thee not, thou shalt have no part with me.

⁹ Simon Peter saith to him: Lord, not only my feet, but also my hands and my head.

¹⁰ Jesus saith to him: He that is washed, needeth not but to wash his feet, but is clean wholly. And you are clean, but not all.

¹¹ For he knew who he was that would betray him; therefore he said: You are not all clean.

¹² Then after he had washed their feet, and taken his garments, being set down again, he said to them: Know you what I have done to you?

¹³ You call me Master, and Lord; and you say well, for so I am.

¹⁴ If then I being your Lord and Master, have washed your feet; you also ought to wash one another's feet.

¹⁵ For I have given you an example, that as I have done to you, so you do also.

¹⁶ Amen, amen I say to you: The servant is not greater than his lord; neither is the apostle greater than he that sent him.

¹⁷ If you know these things, you shall be blessed if you do them.

¹⁸ I speak not of you all: I know whom I have chosen. But that the scripture may be fulfilled: He that eateth bread with me, shall lift up his heel against me.

¹⁹ At present I tell you, before it come to pass: that when it shall come to pass, you may believe that I am he.

²⁰ Amen, amen I say to you, he that receiveth whomsoever I send, receiveth me; and he that receiveth me, receiveth him that sent me.

Triduum: Extraordianry Form in southern Ontario

ARCHDIOCESE OF TORONTO

Carmel of the Infant Jesus, Zephyr

Holy Thursday - 8:00 P.M.

Good Friday - 3:00 P.M.

Holy Saturday Vigil - 8:00 P.M.

Read Liturgies (no music)

Easter Sunday, usual times at St. Patrick's Schomberg, St. Vincent de Paul, Holy Family, St. Lawrence, Carmel of the Infant Jesus

DIOCESE OF HAMILTON

No Triduum Services

generally one hour plus from Mitchell or St. Catharines

Easter Sunday at St. Ann's Kitchener

DIOCESE OF LONDON

St. Vincent de Paul Catholic Church, Mitchell 

(twinned with St. Patrick's Kinkora)

Holy Thursday, 7:30 P.M. Sung Mass

Good Friday, 3:00 P.M. Sung Service of the Lord's Passion

Holy Saturday Vigil - 7:00 P.M. (Read only)

Solemn OF Latin/English Easter Vigil at St. Patrick's Kinkora at 8:00 P.M.

Easter Sunday Solemn High Mass at 12:00 at St. Patrick's Kinkora

Easter Sunday at Assumption Church, Windsor (usual time)

DIOCESE OF ST. CATHARINES

St. Aloysius Gonzaga, Thorold (FSSP)

Holy Thursday Sung Mass 7:00 P.M.

Good Friday Solemn Liturgy, 3:00 P.M.

Holy Saturday Sung Paschal Vigil, 10:30 P.M.

Easter Sunday 9:00 A.M. and 11:00 A.M.

Conrad Black: An up to now closeted enemy of the faith

Conrad Black's arrogance has been well known in Canada for decades. While one can appreciate his intellect, his business practices are exactly what Pope Francis would have deplored. I know people who still pay the price for his corporate manipulation and pension machinations in Toronto thirty years ago. Black spent time in prison in Florida for malfeasance against shareholders in the United States. Brought into the Catholic Church by the late Toronto Archbishop Emmett Cardinal Carter, Black had renounced his Canadian citizenship in order to accept the peerage of the British House of Lords. It is important to note that Emmett Cardinal Carter, one of the so-called, "gang-of-five" was instrumental in the development of the Winnipeg Statement which gave Canadian Catholics the "permission" to dissent on Church teaching.

In a column in the National Review, Lord Black contradicts himself in a column instructing Pope Francis to change the Church's teaching on contraception. On the one hand he finds it "commendable" that the Church "avoids trendiness and pandering" which "distinguishes it from many other churches" and on the hand declares that "the Church’s official position on contraception enables its enemies to portray it as an archaic society for the propagation of chaste humbug by an esoteric fraternity of superannuated clergymen in antiquarian costumes." 

So which is it Lord Black; Is the Church to be commended for not being trendy or is She to submit to the worldly view?

And speaking of "antiquarian costumes" ...

Lord Black tried to dismiss his outfit, saying it was "the only one available at the costumier the day before the party" and insisted that he certainly wasn't dressed as the power-crazed Richelieu. He added that, rather than Marie Antoinette, Barbara - famous for her hundreds of pairs of Manolo Blahnik shoes and penchant for gold-plated loos - was dressed as a lowly barmaid.

Black opines that the Church should end its "its hostility to safe sex ahead of its mortal opposition to abortion: and calls it "a much more defensible and important cause that would be directly assisted by ending the failed war on contraception." Yet, whilst doing so, he completely misses the intricate connection between failed contraception and procured abortion to say nothing of the degradation of the conjugal act to be only for that of pleasure divorced from its procreative aspects. Black declares that the Church's teaching is "not supported by more than a small and very doctrinaire section of the laity." This may be true, but even Lord Black should know that the Church is not a democracy.

Rather than lecturing Pope Francis, perhaps Lord Black might allow Pope Francis' words on humility to pierce him instead; but then, Black's unethical business practices in Canada were exactly those which caused the growth of Liberation Theology in the land from where our Holy Father hails.

Pro-Life? No software for you!

No Software for you!

Software company refuses service to pro-life group over abortion, marriage views

BY THADDEUS BAKLINSKI

• Mon Mar 18, 2013 11:08 EST
• Comments ()

TORONTO, March 18, 2013 (LifeSiteNews.com) - A U.S. company that provides software solutions to nonprofit organizations has refused service to the Canadian pro-life group Campaign Life Coalition, accusing it of supporting “hate, prejudice and bigotry." 

CLC's Jack Fonseca told LifeSiteNews.com that recently Campaign Life Coalition asked an information technology (IT) consultant to help improve its business processes. 

"He searched for a database solutions company that specializes in non-profits like ours," Fonseca told LifeSiteNews. The IT specialist found a company called The Databank, based in Minneapolis, Minnesota.

Read the rest here.

Solemn Mass for St. Joseph at Richmond Hill

What better way to celebrate Holy Father's installation on the same day; let us celebrate the Patron Saint of the Universal Church and of Canada with a Solemn Latin Mass in the Ordinary Form with the music of Franz  Schubert.

If you've not been to St. Mary's or to an Ordinary Form liturgy celebrated in complete accord with the intent, then you should come and experience the solemnity and prayer.

See you there!

Father Forget responds

In a story titled, Toronto Star trashes Catholic priest for raising sexual immorality, misrepresents Archdiocese, LifeSiteNews has further developed the matter, Diocesan spokesman publicly rebukes Toronto priest. In an interview with LifeSiteNews, Neil MacCarthy, Director of Communications for the Archdiocese of Toronto indicated that he spoke with the Toronto Star reporter for twenty minutes. However, it would appear that Mr. MacCarthy, who was extensively interviewed, was not actually misquoted, but selectively quoted. 

Father Charles Forget, Pastor at St. Leo the Great, in Brooklin, Ontario, attached to the weekly bulletin a standard "examination of conscience" brochure. For those who might have missed it (can't imagine how if they went to Mass on Sunday), women of the parish with children in the two elementary schools inserted the examination of conscience into identifiable envelopes, sealed them and delivered them to the schools for distribution. There were only two complaints from parents were received at the parish who later went on to write vile and possibly criminal remarks on the Brooklin Moms Facebook Page and contacted the Toronto Star. "You haven't heard the last of me" one screamed. Vox has confirmed that the reporter at the Star is now a member of the same, Brooklin Moms Facebook page. It seems that the protagonist in this matter who wrote extensively in the comment box at the above link works for a firm aiding in people obtaining divorces. It is now clear that the objection was not the form itself but the action sins listed, particularly those of homosexuality and lesbianism as revealed in direct correspondence.

Father Forget has written in his bulletin for this weekend an explanation to provide clarity to the parishioners and the facts. In the interests of truth, Father has given permission to post the bulletin remarks on the matter here.

The people of St. Leo's Brooklin are very fortunate to have such a Pastor. May God bless Father Forget and the people at St. Leo's as we enter Passiontide: 

H  A   T   R   E   D

“Gossip is hearing things you like

about people you don’t.”

Hatred is such a strong word and an awful thing.  It can lead to calumny, (a misrepresentation intended to harm someone else’s reputation - Merriam Webster Dictionary), cause the ruin of another’s life or even put the other persons’ life in danger in the extreme.  I love the above quote I heard on a radio program a while ago because it hits the nail on the head.  We tend to think of gossip as a light form of talking about other people’s lives, faults, shortcomings, behaviours and actions but at the heart of gossip is often hatred for another person.  Speaking about someone else can also be a forum for us to falsely feel better about ourselves as we compare ourselves to someone else we strongly criticize.

Brooklin is a relatively small community where people tend to know and recognize one another more than they would in larger urban centres.  I am sure it is no surprise to anyone in our parish of the situation I have been facing with a small group of people who have been fueling flames of hate towards me, the Catholic Church and pretty much anything they can wrap their tongues around and their more recent venture to go to, what one blogger so aptly called “a Catholic-hating, Catholic-bating media outlet” with the hope of goodness knows what. 

Stories grow and have a tendency to become embellished and take on another life.  I feel the need to write here what has taken place to enable our parishioners to know the full truth should they hear all manner of versions from the media and talk on the street.  As my mother used to say, “Error is half way around the world before truth gets its’ boots on”.

On Sunday February 24^th I inserted in the parish bulletin a two-sided sheet called an Examination of Conscience (which I didn’t compose) and explained in my announcements that this was intended as an aid to those who might want to avail themselves of the Sacrament of Reconciliation taking place two days later.  Many parishioners told me they used them and I received no complaints or comments at all.  The following day I sent to the homes of every Catholic parent who has a child in one of our two elementary Catholic schools, envelopes containing the same Examination of Conscience along with a cover letter explaining the Examination of Conscience and an admittedly blunt, straight forward message about the need for Catholics to attend Mass each Sunday and that not do so constitutes serious sin, a sin that some parents pass on to their children who will continue to do what their non-church-going parents have taught them.  Twenty years of priesthood has shown me that a soft, sweet and flowery letter would not have impacted anyone. Considering our times of moral relativism, a loss of a sense of sin and a general attitude among some Catholics that all that is necessary in life is to “be nice”, I felt the language had to be honest and challenging.  All of the envelopes, marked with the name of the parish, were sealed by women of the parish who have children in both of our schools and these were distributed to the schools to be taken home by children to their parents.  (We use this exact process twice a year in sending home sacramental information to any parents who might otherwise not know what is going on sacramentally in the parish and the Catholic School Board does the same in our parishes.)

Two days later I received a phone call from one parent who was furious at what I had sent to her home.  She told me her envelope was not sealed and that her daughter had opened it and read a word she asked her mother about.  But that was not her point of upset.  Her anger was over one of the sins mentioned in the Examination of Conscience which she took great exception to and taught her children that it was okay in their family.  The issue was over the actual Examination of Conscience and how dare I as a priest send that garbage to their home.  Our phone conversation was short and her last words to me were to the effect that this would not be the last I would be hearing from her. 

This same woman is also on a local Facebook group of mainly Brooklin moms and she started a tirade that invited a handful of other moms to join in on the fun of mercilessly attacking me personally, my priesthood, the parish, the Catholic Faith and Catholic schools and organized religion in general all the while still calling themselves ‘Catholics’.  Messages were sent that could never be repeated in civil company much less a parish bulletin and it was obvious that the instigator was bent on fueling the flames all the more in her attack.  She finally came to the conclusion that ‘someone’ (but not her) needed to go to the media with this and the assurance that anyone who spoke to the reporter could remain anonymous.  She could serve my name up to the likes of the Toronto Star but she and others could remain incognito.  Most convenient.

Sadly, the real issue that started this whole shemozzle – a person taking exception to Catholic teaching – has been lost as with the Star article the ‘anonymous’ now claim that the issue is that I sent the letter home with their children, unsealed.  And it certainly didn’t help that a representative of the Archdiocese said to the reporter that my letter wasn’t ‘pastoral’.  But the letter was not the bone of contention at all and hasn’t even been cited by the Facebook group – it was the content of the Examination of Conscience that Jesus wrote in the sand in this Sunday’s Gospel.

Perhaps my letter and the attached Examination of Conscience hit such an unexpected nerve because those who are filled with rage don’t understand the role and call of the Priest of Jesus Christ.  There is a moral imperative upon every priest as a shepherd of souls to speak the truth that has been revealed by God, in season and out of season.  While some have reduced the Gospels to a group of days in the life of a man, people of faith know them to be a Living Word, able to, with great power, convict us and comfort us, challenge us and give us hope; to warn us and defend us, to teach us and to guard us.  Jesus is that One, the Son of God, our Saviour who has revealed to us all that we need to know in following Him faithfully with our lives.  Jesus is the One who founded the Church upon Peter, the Rock.  Jesus is the One who instituted the Priesthood in order that the Sacraments He entrusted to the Church might be administered, the Gospel preached, the sinner converted, Holy Mass to be celebrated and Christ made present.  Each priest is called by Holy Orders to “preach, teach and sanctify” and to call sinners to repentance, himself included.  As a priest and pastor, sending the Examination of Conscience to Catholic homes was a part of doing my job.

In the Book of the Prophet Ezekiel (3:20) whom God appointed as a “watchman for the Israelites”, we read about the same responsibility for souls that every priest is charged with:

“It may be that a righteous man turns away and does wrong, and I let that be the cause of his downfall; he will die because you have not warned him.  He will die for his sin; the righteous deeds he has done will not be taken into account, and I will hold you answerable for his death.  But if you have warned the righteous man not to sin and he has not sinned, then he will have saved his life because he has been warned, and you will have saved yourself.”

One comment posted on a Catholic blog put it so well:

“The call of the conscience is very unpleasant indeed, but then again, so is the strident noise of the fire alarm, and we don't normally complain about it when it saves our lives. So do we really value our spiritual lives the same way?”

Good point.  Sometimes it’s ‘pastoral’ to shout!  (Fr. Charles)

Prayerful Cardinal, Deaf Reporter, Absent Media Man

May God bless Thomas Cardinal Collins our Archbishop of Toronto. What a kind and thoughtful pastor when confronted by such idiocy. I can tell you, I would not have handled this imbecile with the same grace and tact and patience and tolerance. Let us continue to pray for him and all the Cardinals at this time.

 

Twenty-five years ago, I lived in Ottawa and worked on Parliament Hill as a Special Assistant to a Cabinet Minister in the government under Brian Mulroney; he later went on to become a provincial premier. Advance was my specialty and he was never more than a metre away from me. If someone had a gun, my job was to jump in front of the bullet, as well as have a clean shirt and tie in my briefcase in case he dripped his coffee. My point is this, we are talking here about our Cardinal Archbishop, a Prince of the Church on the morning of the Conclave on his way to St. Peter's Basilica for Holy Mass; he should not have had to struggle with his bag, and a cart, trying to call for a cab  in the rain and at the same time fend off (with much grace and pastoral solicitude, I might add) a nasty, nosy and  bothersome reporter, who showed no discipline, no tact and no respect.

The Cardinal should not have been left exposed and to fend for himself.

Diocesan "spokesman" publicly rebukes Toronto priest

Reading anything from the Toronto Star is not something that this blogger does, nor any MSM print source for that matter. Therefore, I depend on friends and readers to bring the devil's work to my attention as with this sad matter.

The Director of Communications for the Archdiocese of Toronto, Neil MacCarthy in an interview with the Toronto press is quoted as saying "There was a more pastoral way to welcome people back to the church, ... You have to find the most caring way.”

It seems that a Catholic pastor, Father Charles Forget of St. Leo's Parish in Brooklin, east of the City of Toronto sent a letter to the parents of school children in a sealed envelope. He preached against sin and asked people to come to the Sacrament of Penance/Reconciliation. According to the obviously biased media the letter included: "Have I committed adultery or fornication? Have I become intoxicated? Have I been disobedient or disrespectful to my husband? “Have I done unnecessary servile work (physical labour) or shopping on Sunday?” and “Have I denied my spouse his or her marriage rights?” There were a few for children as well such as: “Have I talked back to parents, teachers or other adults? “Have I pouted and been moody?” The letter concluded with, “Pray about it. Do not be afraid. Come, be reconciled!”

As typical of a spoilt and puerile paganised Catholic generation, some were "shocked" that a priest would do his job and they filed complaints with the school board and of course, called the ever eager Toronto Star to take another shot at the Church.

“Made for an interesting conversation, where my kids were asking what abortion and masturbation were — since it came in an unsealed envelope addressed to no one, and they read it,” the parent said in an email (to the Star). “Hardly appropriate material for a kindergarten to grade 8 school.”

Well I've got news for these parents. Your kid is probably masturbating and someone in his or her catholic school has shown them some porn! Nah, they probably found your stash! Your little angel uses the "F" word too. So, get your head out of the sand and a few other places where the sun doesn't shine and parent-up!

Father says the letters were in sealed envelopes. The parents who contacted the press, said they were not. I'll choose to believe Father Forget rather than the paganised Catholic parents who contracept, abort, watch porn, don't go to Mass on Sunday, don't support the Church with time or money or both and don't raise their children to be Catholic. One opines that she is going to put her children in the public school. Well, don't let the door hit'cha on the way out; I'm sure your kid will find all about masturbating over there but don't expect a Christmas pageant for your little snowflake.

The real problem in this story though is not the priest, the parents the Durham Catholic District School Board or the Toronto Star, the problem is the Director of Communications at the Archdiocese of Toronto. The arrogance of the chancery bureaucracy in Toronto and its chastisement of a priest in public, its lack of support for a priest doing his job and for church teaching, that is the problem here. 

It is not the job of the Director of Communications of this or any Archdiocese to publicly rebuke a priest, to undermine his reputation and authority in his parish. To do this for a half dozen people who probably were in the greatest need of that letter is interfering in the "pastoral" duty and care for souls of that priest. I would think that Mr. MacCarthy should have been applauding the priest to the press and the parents in the administration of the Sacrament of Reconciliation not to condemn him for trying to wake the people up as to the reality of sin.

The "sin of the century is the loss of the sense of sin" said Blessed Pius XII. That is clear in this little parish in Brooklin and it is simply unacceptable that he be rebuked by a bureaucrat.

Any others wish to 'fess up?

3 March 2013

Statement from Cardinal O'Brien

"In recent days certain allegations which have been made against me have
become public. Initially, their anonymous and non-specific nature led me
to contest them.

However, I wish to take this opportunity to admit that there have been
times that my sexual conduct has fallen below the standards expected of me
as a priest, archbishop and cardinal.

To those I have offended, I apologise and ask forgiveness.

To the Catholic Church and people of Scotland, I also apologise.

I will now spend the rest of my life in retirement. I will play no further
part in the public life of the Catholic Church in Scotland."


ENDS

Peter Kearney
Director
Catholic Media Office
5 St. Vincent Place
Glasgow
G1 2DH
0141 221 1168
07968 122291
pk@scmo.org
www.scmo.org


Notes to editors:

1. This is the only statement, which Cardinal O'Brien will be issuing.
2. Cardinal O'Brien will not attend the Conclave to elect the new Pope.
3. Cardinal O'Brien is now out of the country and will not be available
for interview.

Our beloved Papa

It was twenty-five years ago when I first heard the name Joseph Ratzinger. I was intrigued by a book with a red cover and this Cardinal with striking white-hair. I had never heard of him before but I purchased that book, The Ratzinger Report, from the table at the fledgling “Ottawa Oratory.” Between that book and the two by the late Anne Roche Muggeridge, - The Gates of Hell and The Desolate City, what began in me was a greater understanding of the Catholic faith, the errors resulting from a wrong interpretation of a Council and the need for the right liturgical reform of the highest order.

During the funeral of Blessed John Paul II and the interregnum, the influence and awareness of Joseph Cardinal Ratzinger grew amongst many more. When he stepped out that afternoon on the balcony of St. Peter’s Basilica, I was filled with joy and exultation. Here at last was the Pope that would begin the restoration we all needed. As has been said many times, it begins with the liturgy. It starts there and if it is poorly celebrated and poorly considered we fail to offer to God that which He deserves – sacrifice and thanksgiving. This was the liturgical pope. From his insistence on the implementation of the English Third Edition of the Roman Missal, to “pro multis” properly translated as “for many,” the example of Holy Communion on the tongue and kneeling, the restoration of dignity to the liturgy at the Vatican, the music, the chant and of course his greatest gift to us, Summorum Pontificum --  it is my belief that this motu proprio will go down in church history as one of, if not his greatest achievement. He has left his liturgical mark.

He is a brilliant man, an intellectual who could write and speak in words that all could absorb and understand. He is gentle and kind and patient and we did not deserve him.

In 2005 he wrote of the “filth” in the Church and nobody has done more to address this than him. We now find that at least two to three bishops per month were asked to resign around the world, if they refused, he moved them out under Canon Law. This man has done, for every Catholic, more than we even now know. Wracked by scandal; by something many of us have believed for years, he leaves to his successor a task to take up from him and cleanse the Church of the filth within it. The deceit in fiduciary duty, the homosexual cabal, the blackmail, the blight on the Bride of Christ; the disobedience, the dissent --  he has given us the gift of clarity in this and the power to his successor to correct what he was incapable of doing at this point in his life.

Many priests, bishops and cardinals were against him. Many did not carry out his requests, many mocked him. They bear a great responsibility for the shape of the Church today. He has taken extraordinary steps to ensure that his successor will not suffer this same situation and all Cardinals must give oath to loyalty to the new Pontiff as he himself has already done.

Yet, this Pontiff will not be leaving us; he will be there though we will not see him again. He is now at the foot of the cross, or perhaps he will be on the cross suffering a white martyrdom, never again to see his beloved Bavaria, never again to leave the gardens of the Vatican and the monastery that awaits him. He will be there, sacrificing his freedom, his one time hope of retirement in Bavaria -- sacrificing for Christ, for His Church, for you and me. Can this man do any more to show us his love for Christ and for us?

As with many of you; I am very saddened today, this has been a very difficult few weeks for us. None of us desires to see him go. My heart is heavy and to see the deceit around him and the assault in the secular media upon the Church and our Pontiff makes it even more difficult but "know that if they hated Me" is what we must remember. Many have criticised his departure but let us not lose our faith in Our Lord's promise and let us see this as an inspired act on the part of Papa Ratzinger for greater glory for Christ.

Let us rejoice that what he has done has truly been an inspiration from Our Lord Jesus Christ and our Blessed Mother. Let us be grateful to God for this man, for what he has done and what he has taught us. Let us look forward to the next few weeks, despite our fears and our worries. Let us trust that the Holy Spirit will give to us and to the whole world the Pope we need. Let us pray for our Cardinals that they will take their time, not rush and that the conclave will be filled with hearts open to the Holy Spirit and that the Blessed Mother, the Theotokos, will be in their minds and hearts, guiding them, prompting them, inspiring them.

In his farewell today to the Cardinals assembled, our beloved Holy Father said this:

"Prior to bidding farewell to each of you personally, I want to tell you that I will continue to be close to you in prayer, especially in the next few days, so that you may all be fully docile to the action of the Holy Spirit in the election of the new Pope. May the Lord show you what is willed by Him. And among you, among the College of Cardinals, there is also the future Pope, to whom, here to today, I already promise my unconditional reverence and obedience. For all this, with affection and gratitude, I cordially impart upon you my Apostolic Blessing."

God love you, Joseph Ratzinger and Mary protect you.

Veni, Sancte Spiritus!

Vatican spokesman and a false ecumenism

The Saturday Windsor Star January 18, 1986

MARTY GERVAIS ON RELIGION

Basilian Deacon puts sharing at forefront of religious aims

THE WORD Thomas Rosica repeats over and over again is “scandalous.”

He’s referring to the way in which churches tend to remain segregated, isolated, interested in their own.

If you spend any time talking to Rosica, he will tell you just how frustrated he gets when he hears how Roman Catholic priests speak in such chauvinistic ways about salvation in the “Catholic Church.” He doesn’t even like it when they refer to themselves as Catholics, when the word “Christian” would not only have been good enough, but preferable.

It’s not that he doesn’t like Catholics – he is one. In fact, this spring he will be ordained a priest of the Basilian religious order.

The fact is, Rosica spent a good part of his field training as a priest working on ecumenism. In 1984 he surveyed churches in the Montreal area for the Canadian Centre for Ecumenism to determine where they stood on church unity. His findings, and especially the approach Rosica took to the survey, are being examined and considered by the Canadian Conference of Catholic Bishops. There is the possibility that the Roman Catholic Church’s umbrella organization in Canada will implement a survey of this kind on a national basis.

THE YOUNG DEACON working at St. John the Baptist Church in Amherstburg with its other Basilian priests regards the whole matter of ecumenism as “scandalous.” He sees “the Catholic ghetto mentality as a stumbling block and knows just how reticent clergymen from other denominations can be when it comes to authentic sharing.  Some of it has to do with being “too set in their ways” but there are other reasons, too.  In some cases, the clergymen know little of the ecumenical movement, and they haven’t bothered to do “any reading at all about it.”

There’s also the notion that their churches are suffering serious losses in membership. The direction now is to shore up what they can count on.

UNFORTUNATELY, the notion exists that some churches have the exclusive copyright on the “word of God, “ says Rosica.

“But the word of God is for all people,” says Rosica, who adds that it isn’t just for Catholics or Anglicans or Presbyterians.

Another fact, says Rosica, is that many denominations must learn that no one is out to threaten the existence of any one church. In addition to this, the myth has to be dispelled that the only way in which the Roman Catholics are going to be part of church unity is for all Christian denominations (to) join Rome.

Rosica says there is no reason real ecumenism -- even to the point of an organic union – can’t mean a harmony of various Christian denominations in one community.

The Basilian deacon could sit all day in his office at St. John the Baptist and talk about the ecumenical movement. While he doesn’t regard himself as an expert, the survey did teach him something. His objective is to set into motion something that will bring churches in Amherstburg closer together.

ROSICA EXPECTS to return here after ordination, and if he does, he feels he will continue his ecumenical work in the town. The real test for the ecumenical movement, he says, is at the grass roots: moving the “local” churches into a situation where they will share more and pray more together.

Sunday will see the first step in that direction: St. John the Baptist is holding an ecumenical prayers service at 2:30 p.m. where five different Christian denominations – the Baptists, United Church, Anglicans, Presbyterians and Roman Catholics – will be participating.

Rev. John Parker, Pastor of Wesley United Church, will deliver the homily. The service coincides with the first Sunday, in the Week of Christian Unity, celebrated by Catholics and Protestants around the world. The service in itself is admittedly a “minor act” says Rosica, but it could be the beginning of a new awareness the churches will have for one another.

HE SEES Amherstburg as no different than any other community, pointing out that no matter how much dialogue the national churches hold, unless clergy and congregations at the local level are prepared to start talking to one another in a meaningful way, then ecumenism is simply a dream.

He says if churches persist in taking the attitude that they “have all the answers,” then nothing is going to be advanced in church unity.

But while Rosica likes being an idealist, he is intimately aware of the obstacles.

Intercommunion is certainly the first to spring to mind. In some ways, he regards the Roman Catholic Church’s reluctance to permit Catholics and Protestants to take communion in their churches as an embarrassment. On the other hand, he also has a lot of respect for his church in holding back from the pressure until other obstacles have been cleared away.

THIS IS BECAUSE Rome regards the eucharist as “the fullness of unity,” Rosica says.

He added until other obstacles have been resolved, there can be no unity.

Bishop Sherlock told the fall synod of Canadian Bishops that the extension of communion to non-Catholics would be a “form of cheating.”

He had said, “It assumes a unity which has not yet occurred.”

But Rosica agrees with the new CCCB vice-president, Archbishop James Hayes of Halifax, that the issue should be pursued, and that “shared communion” with Protestant denominations at times of mixed marriages and funerals should be encouraged.

The church sanctions such a practice.

Unfortunately, Rosica says some priests aren’t even aware of “this possibility” – to them it’s a non-issue.

ESSENTIALLY, such an attitude or lack of awareness is a formidable obstacle to church unity. Rosica says it comes down to the glaring fact that many clergy just won’t bother to acquaint themselves with what is being done about church unity.

Apathy is another obstacle, Rosica said explain how some priests regard the issue as “just another job” they have to do. As a result, he says, there is no compelling urge to do anything more than pay lip service to it.

Another stumbling block lies with the training institutions which tend to want to propagate and further their own denominational interests and philosophies. As a result, there are institutions that tend to favour one religion over another, when in fact they ought to be “open” to the whole spectrum.

IN HIS REPORT to the Canadian Ecumenical Commission, Rosica wrote that while it might be difficult “to complain” about training in the past from the era before or during Vatican II which spurred on ecumenism, “We have a right and duty, however, to take objection with these young people (including young professors), who, through their theology courses and their religious beliefs, wish to move the Ecumenical movement back to a time when it new no possibilities for growth.”

Rosica says unless the church – not only the Roman Catholic Church – begins to take a “a vested interest”  in the formation of clergy, making sure they are less chauvinistic about their denomination – then ecumenism is going to remain at a standstill.

Because of the lack of any read dramatic unity, Rosica says people have indeed, lost interest in church unity.

He said this in his report too, pointing out that the findings showed that “many have lost the desire for unity over the past years, and even fewer really sense the scandalous division existing within our own church and also among the Christian churches.

ROSICA KNOWS that the move toward church unity has to be gradual and it must go through a set of “sequences.” Sunday’s service is the beginning. The next step is to form a ministerial association.

The next step is to work on “twinning” churches, where churches begin to do some real sharing and experimenting with liturgies.

Rosica isn’t sure how successful he will be. He hopes for the best. He says as long as congregations are praying, “somehow the spirit of God is alive.”

He’s certain this will ease the impatience.