A corporal work of mercy.

A corporal work of mercy.
Click on photo for this corporal work of mercy!

Wednesday 28 March 2018

French "priest' claims Bergoglio approved the blessing of sodomite "couples"

While it is a desire to quiet down for Holy Week and ease up on the blogging, it is particularly hard to do with hirelings in place of shepherds and a Church overrun by sodomites, malefactors and malfeasant and faithless men. I think that it remains upon us to not run from it and not hide from it so that we can share with Our Most Blessed Lord Jesus, the sufferings he continues to endure.

Here we are on Spy Wednesday, the day when we recall the betrayal by Judas and what do we find?

A so-called priest, from France, Daniel Duigou, has announced in a television interview that the so-called Pope of Rome has encouraged him and approved of his blessing of a sodomites as a so-called, couple.

So-called, priest, pope and couples -- all of them, filthy Judases.

Is this priest a liar? Did Bergoglio really tell him this?

Is this Daniel Duigou a pervert and sodomite himself?

I highly doubt Bergoglio corrected this Son of Satan for his lack of clerical dress.


French Priest: Pope Francis approved my blessing of homosexual couples

Featured Image

March 28, 2018 (LifeSiteNews) – A French priest has announced in a televised interview that Pope Francis approved of his blessing of homosexual couples. The news comes in the wake of silence from the Pope at the suggestion of one of his main advisor Cardinals that spiritual encouragement of homosexual couples should be undertaken and blessings for homosexual couples should not be ruled out.
Father Daniel Duigou, priest of the Church Saint-Merry in Paris, France, is a late vocation and a former journalist who holds progressive views. According to a recent interview he gave to the international news service Konbini News, he just published an Open Letter to Pope Francis (Lettre Ouverte d'un Curé au Pape François) in the form of a book in which he calls for a “reinvention” of the Church and for a removal of the “monopoly” of the role of the priests in the Church.
Most importantly, Father Duigou also claimed to have received Pope Francis' personal support for blessing homosexual and “remarried” couples.

In the interview, Duigou said that he had a 45-minute personal meeting with Pope Francis. The photo on the cover of his book released this month supports his claim of the private meeting. 

Sunday 25 March 2018

Bergoglio and his Yoots talk together


Silly little sissies.

Related imageOh, look, they're all sitting in circle on the floor just like they did in Kindergarten with the teacher sitting over them in the big chair reading them a story.

What pathetic, immoral abuse being committed by this Bergoglio and his filthy minions upon these "yoots" and the Catholic faithful.

Get ready for the next Synod from Hell. This summary at OnePeterFive gives you a clear idea of what will be on it. 

Question any priest who spends his time fretting over and promoting these kinds of exercises for youths. Question his manhood and keep your children away from him. 

Thursday 22 March 2018

The Dictator Pope's minions have proven that he is a Dictator Pope

Featured Image

For a few days now, it has been revealed that the author of The Dictator Pope is actually the historian, Henry Sire. Publishing under the name Marcantonio Colonna, the second edition is about to be released in hardcover.

Sire is a Knight of Malta.

Sire was suspended from the Knights of Malta.

The Dictator Pope, who disembowelled and took over the Knights of Malta and put in place his German stooges, has proven to one and all that he is indeed the Dictator Pope.



Sunday 18 March 2018

The shiftiness and bluster of the Bergoglian papacy

From Father Hunwicke:

https://liturgicalnotes.blogspot.ca/2018/03/like-getting-blood-out-of-stone.html

If this man Vigano were to be kept in office, it would be the final detail in the unfolding public demonstration of the moral corruption right at the heart of this failed pontificate. In politics, it is often not the big issues that bring a crisis to its head, but something that starts off as insignificant to the point of pettiness. During this Bergoglian era, the two major disasters have been the shiftiness, accompanied by unbecoming bluster, in the area of paedophilia and coverups and cronyism; and attempts to get away with perverting the Church's moral teaching by stealth. Those things matter infinitely more than the current silly and minor episode.
 But 'Lettergate' provides such a vivid snapshot of dirty little men involved in dirty little plots for thoroughly dirty purposes. Even anti-Ratzinger veterans among the Commentariat like Robert Mickens can see this.
If PF cannot be made to understand the need to clean out his own Augean Stables, surely he should be made to go. Not next week, but this week.

I would go further and say that last week would not have been too soon!

Bergoglio's lying minions: More of the "Letter" is revealed and it is not complimentary.

Yet even more of that letter from Ratzinger has been revealed and it is not complimentary. We can agree now that it was written by Joseph Ratzinger, but the attempt by the Vatican apparatchiks to manipulate it is just so revealing of this whole disgusting papacy.

All of these deceits and scandals continue and no one is held accountable. Whether it is betraying a confidential letter, lying to the world's media, consuming cocaine, masturbating child-porn aficionado's or evil filthy homosexual priests and child molesters. 

Bergoglio sits by silent.


Benedictus XVI
Pope Emeritus
Most Reverend Msgr. Dario Edoardo Viganò
Prefect of the Secretariat for Communications
Vatican City
February 7, 2018

Most Reverend Monsignor,
Thank you for your kind letter of 12 January and the attached gift of the eleven small volumes edited by Roberto Repole.
I applaud this initiative that wants to oppose and react to the foolish prejudice in which Pope Francis is just a practical man without particular theological or philosophical formation, while I have been only a theorist of theology with little understanding of the concrete life of a Christian today.
The small volumes show, rightly, that Pope Francis is a man of profound philosophical and theological formation, and they therefore help to see the inner continuity between the two pontificates, despite all the differences of style and temperament.
However, I don’t feel like writing a short and dense theological passage on them because throughout my life it has always been clear that I would write and express myself only on books I had read really well. Unfortunately, if only for physical reasons, I am unable to read the eleven volumes in the near future, especially as other commitments await me that I have already made.
Only as an aside, I would like to note my surprise at the fact that among the authors is also Professor Hünermann, who during my pontificate had distinguished himself by leading anti-papal initiatives. He played a major part in the release of the “Kölner Erklärung”, which, in relation to the encyclical “Veritatis splendour”, virulently attacked the magisterial authority of the Pope, especially on questions of moral theology. Also the “Europaische Theologengesellschaft”, which he founded, was initially conceived by him as an organization in opposition to the papal magisterium. Later, the ecclesial sentiment of many theologians prevented this orientation, allowing that organization to become a normal instrument of encounter among theologians.
I am sure you will understand my refusal and I offer you cordial greetings.
Yours,
Benedict XVI


Saturday 17 March 2018

Francis & Antonio: Out of Time

The snakes driven out by Patrick are back

Isn't that a grand face. Quite the little leprechaun. 

The snakes driven out of Ireland were not literal snakes, they were sodomites. Ireland's pagan culture was worse than that of Greece for its affection for sodomy and what we now call homosexuality. 

It has not gone unnoticed how many homosexual priests in Canada convicted of abusing children were of Irish ancestry. Sorry Irish friends to rain on your St. Patrick's Parade.

This is what makes James Martin and Daniel Horan's homosexualist advocacy so infuriating, it was homosexuals admitted to the priesthood who abused the boys. Dead stop.

No man with any homosexual orientation should have ever been ordained to the Catholic priesthood. Every one who is should be removed.

Homosexuality is an intrinsic disorder. A man who is homosexual is incompatible with the Catholic priesthood. 

Period.


Malachy Finnegan, why was this sodomite ordained?

 
A former Catholic priest remembers Fr Malachy Finnegan when he was at the Stroud treatment centre for sex offenders in Gloucestershire, England. It was 1995, and the former priest had himself been sent there because he was gay and was considered a sex addict by church authorities.
He recalls Finnegan during group therapy sessions when everyone was expected to be open and honest about their activities as part of their treatment “He never opened his mouth for the four months he was there [at the sessions] except to say, with resolute stubbornness, ‘I’ve done nothing wrong’.”


Thursday 15 March 2018

Vatican manipulators betray Ratzinger's "Personal reserved" letter!

Oh the tangled web that Bergoglio and his minions have set for themselves. Not only did they manipulate the letter of Joseph Ratzinger, but they betrayed him in releasing it as Sandro Magister reports:

Given that Viganò gave full reading of the letter of Benedict XVI in front of numerous journalists, it should be added that on the envelope that contained it was written: "Personal reserved".

You really could not make this up.


http://magister.blogautore.espresso.repubblica.it/2018/03/15/il-doppio-stolto-pregiudizio-il-testo-integrale-della-lettera-di-benedetto-xvi-con-un-post-scriptum/

The double "foolish prejudice". The complete text of the letter of Benedict XVI. With a Post Scriptum

Viganò 01.25.22
*
The press office of the Holy See did not disclose the full text of the letter sent by Benedict XVI last February 7 to the prefect of the Secretariat for Communication, Monsignor Dario Edoardo Viganò.
Viganò, however, has read it (see photo) on the occasion of the presentation to the press of the series "Theology of Pope Francis", published by the Libreria Editrice Vaticana and made of eleven pamphlets, by various authors, on various aspects of written and oral teaching current pontiff.
The letter is dated February 7 and is in response to a previous letter from Viganò dated 12 January. But since it was announced on the evening of 12 March, the eve of the fifth birthday of the election to pope by Jorge Mario Bergoglio, the public came as if it were a sort of "vote", more than good, given by Benedict. to his successor at the end of his first five years.
This press release was also encouraged by the press release issued for the occasion by Viganò himself, who mentioned the letter only the second and third paragraphs.
In which, however, Benedict XVI rejects not one but a double "foolish prejudice": both that according to which Francis would be "only a practical man devoid of particular theological or philosophical formation", and the other according to which he himself, Joseph Ratzinger, would be " only a theorist of theology that would have understood little of the concrete life of a Christian today ".
To Francis, Benedict recognizes what is undeniable: to have had a profound "formation" in theology and philosophy. As well as recognizing an "inner continuity" between the two pontificates, where the adjective "interior" is at least as good as the noun "continuity", given "all the differences in style and temperament".
And then there is that final paragraph, omitted in the press release, in which Ratzinger, with sincere candor, gives proof of his fine vein of irony. Read it. And who wants to intend intends.
Here is the complete text of the letter, from the heading to the final signature.
*
Benedictus XVI 
Pope Emeritus

Most Rev. Mons. Dario Edoardo Viganò 
Prefect of the 
Secretariat for Communication
Vatican City 
7 February 2018
Most Reverend Monsignor,
I thank you for your kind letter of 12 January and for the attached gift of the eleven small volumes edited by Roberto Repole.
I applaud this initiative that wants to oppose and react to the foolish prejudice that Pope Francis would be only a practical man devoid of special theological or philosophical formation, while I would be only a theorist of theology that would have understood little of the concrete life of a Christian today.
The small volumes show, rightly, that Pope Francis is a man of profound philosophical and theological formation and therefore help to see the inner continuity between the two pontificates, even with all the differences in style and temperament.
However, I do not feel like writing a short and dense theological page on them because in all my life it has always been clear that I would write and express myself only on books that I had also really read. Unfortunately, even for physical reasons, I am not able to read the eleven volumes in the near future, all the more so because I am already waiting for other commitments.
I am sure he will have understanding and I greet him cordially.
His
Benedict XVI
----------
Photo
POST SCRIPTUM - Given that Viganò gave full reading of the letter of Benedict XVI in front of numerous journalists, it should be added that on the envelope that contained it was written: "Personal reserved".
Moreover, Nicole Winfield of the Associated Press found that the photo of the letter released by the Vatican was voluntarily rendered illegible in the first two lines of her last paragraph, for the remainder covered by the booklets on the theology of Pope Francis:

Wednesday 14 March 2018

Bergoglio's Fake News Liars in Vatican caught red-handed manipulating the world's media and Catholic Faithful

Stunning!

These corrupt minions of Bergoglio have been caught again. The liars and manipulators are running scared now. They knew that if the world saw the real letter from Ratzinger they would doubt the credibility of the boss, Don Bergoglio. Therefore, what to do but blur it out -- blur out the lines that Ratzinger wrote that he had no time or desire to read that great depth of philosophical and theological wisdom emanating from the brain of the Argentinian boil on the Seat of Peter.

What more can one say then these malefactors are on the run. They know they've been caught long before this or they would not have manipulated it in the first place.

They are trying to make the boss look good.

It didn't work.

He looks as Peronist, as corrupt, as heretical, as stupid, as manipulative and as vindictive as ever.

Happy Fifth anniversary George. May your sixth be spent as an Emeritus sipping Mate in some seedy little bistro in the worst barrio of Buenos Aires.


VATICAN CITY (AP) — The Vatican admitted Wednesday that it altered a photo sent to the media of a letter from retired Pope Benedict XVI about Pope Francis. The manipulation changed the meaning of the image in a way that violated photojournalist industry standards.
The Vatican’s communications office released the photo of the letter on Monday on the eve of Francis’ five-year anniversary. The letter was cited by Monsignor Dario Vigano, chief of communications, to rebut critics of Francis who question his theological and philosophical heft and say he represents a rupture from Benedict’s doctrine-minded papacy.

Read the rest at:




Tuesday 13 March 2018

The Ratzingoglio Reality

Image result for bergoglio ratzinger
Much is being written and spoken of today with regards to the preface to a series of books which includes the comment in the post below by Joseph Ratzinger. I am of the view this is not his writing because of style. None of us really know.

What I have determined is that too many of us have let Ratzinger off the hook. We loved him. We had illusions of who he was and of course, his Reform of the Reform and then Summorum Pontificum endeared us to him. He seemed to sincerely attempt to rid the Church of the "filth" and perversion, more so than any pope before him or clearly the current occupant of the papal office. Clearly, we have seen him as a father.

But the reality that we must all face is that he is a coward. A pathetic failure. A man who threw down his cross and abandoned his children to wolves, to evil men. The three links below are from people with much more time and inclination to research and report than this writer, particularly the extensive essay by Hilary White at The Remnant.

I don't profess to know the full truth but what I do know is this, it is not found to be in workings of Jorge Bergoglio.

https://remnantnewspaper.com/web/index.php/articles/item/3786-et-tu-benedict-some-final-thoughts-on-joseph-ratzinger

http://www.ncregister.com/blog/edward-pentin/full-text-of-benedict-xvis-letter-to-mons.-vigano

http://magister.blogautore.espresso.repubblica.it/2018/03/13/the-double-foolish-prejudice-the-complete-text-of-the-letter-by-benedict-xvi/

https://akacatholic.com/benedicts-letter-real-forced-or-fake/


https://onepeterfive.com/new-sources-bolster-report-that-pope-benedict-was-involved-in-synod-compromise/