"SATAN IS ALIVE AND WELL AND VERY ACTIVE AT THE VATICAN" AND IN THIS SYNOD!

My apology for missing the link!

An incredible interview by GloriaTV with John Smeaton, Director of the Society for the Protection of Unborn Children and Voice of the Family.

You must listen to this.

Spread it around to every Catholic, to every priest and bishop you know.

Wake them up!

This is your duty! 

The Letter of the Thirteen - signed by Thomas Cardinal Collins, Archbishop of Toronto

There had been indication that a group of thirteen Cardinals presented a letter to Pope Francis expressing their concerns over how the Synod was being conducted. That letter has now been released by Sandro Magister. 

Waking up this morning on Canadian Thanksgiving, which coincides the 19th anniversary of my turning the age of 40, I was given a glorious gift.

The Archbishop of Toronto, Thomas Cardinal Collins signed it!

Your Eminence. Thank you and God keep you strong to persevere. May you always remain in the truth of Christ! Fox and Vox

Thirteen Cardinals Have Written to the Pope. Here’s the Letter

But Francis has rejected their requests en bloc. 

And meanwhile, the “Relatio finalis” has disappeared from the program of the synod

by Sandro Magister 

ROME, October 12, 2015 - On Monday, October 5, at the beginning of work at the synod on the family, Cardinal George Pell delivered a letter to Pope Francis, signed by him and twelve other cardinals, all present in the synod hall.

The thirteen signatories occupy positions of the first rank in the Church’s hierarchy, and three of them are part of the synod’s executive body.

They are, in alphabetical order:

Carlo Caffarra, Archbishop of Bologna, Italy, theologian, formerly the first president of the Pontifical John Paul II Institute for Studies on Marriage and Family;

Thomas C. Collins, archbishop of Toronto, Canada;

Timothy M. Dolan, archbishop of New York, United States;

Willem J. Eijk, Archbishop of Utrecht, Holland;

Péter Erdõ, Archbishop of Esztergom-Budapest, Hungary, president of the Council of the Bishops' Conferences of Europe and relator general of the synod underway, as also at the previous session of October 2014;

Gerhard L. Müller, former Bishop of Regensburg, Germany, since 2012 prefect of the congregation for the doctrine of the faith;

Wilfrid Fox Napier, Archbishop of Durban, South Africa, president delegate of the synod underway as also at the previous session of the synod of October 2014;

George Pell, Archbishop emeritus of Sydney, Australia, since 2014 prefect in the Vatican of the secretariat for the economy;

Mauro Piacenza, Genoa, Italy, former prefect of the congregation for the clergy, since 2013 penitentiary major;

Robert Sarah, former Archbishop of Conakry, Guinea, since 2014 prefect of the congregation for divine worship and the discipline of the sacraments;

Angelo Scola, Archbishop of Milan, Italy;

Jorge L. Urosa Savino, Archbishop of Caracas, Venezuela;

André Vingt-Trois, Archbishop of Paris, France, president delegate of the synod underway as also at the previous session of the synod of October 2014.

Nota Bene: As of late afternoon on October 12, America Magazine reported that the letter had different names which included Cardinal Daniel DiNardo of Galveston-Houston and Cardinals Njue (Kenya), Rivera (Mexico) and Sgreccia (Italy), not Erdo (Hungary), Piacenza (Italy) Scola (Italy) and Vingt-Trois (France

In the letter, concise and perfectly clear, the thirteen cardinals bring to the pope’s attention the serious “concerns” of themselves and other synod fathers over the procedures of the synod, in their judgment “designed to facilitate predetermined results on important disputed questions,” and over the “Instrumentum laboris,” viewed as inadequate as a “guiding text or the foundation of a final document.”

Here is the text of the letter, in the original English.

Your Holiness, As the Synod on the Family begins, and with a desire to see it fruitfully serve the Church and your ministry, we respectfully ask you to consider a number of concerns we have heard from other synod fathers, and which we share. While the synod’s preparatory document, the "Instrumentum Laboris," has admirable elements, it also has sections that would benefit from substantial reflection and reworking.  The new procedures guiding the synod seem to guarantee it excessive influence on the synod’s deliberations and on the final synodal document.  As it stands, and given the concerns we have already heard from many of the fathers about its various problematic sections, the "Instrumentum" cannot adequately serve as a guiding text or the foundation of a final document. The new synodal procedures will be seen in some quarters as lacking openness and genuine collegiality.  In the past, the process of offering propositions and voting on them served the valuable purpose of taking the measure of the synod fathers' minds.  The absence of propositions and their related discussions and voting seems to discourage open debate and to confine discussion to small groups; thus it seems urgent to us that the crafting of propositions to be voted on by the entire synod should be restored. Voting on a final document comes too late in the process for a full review and serious adjustment of the text.
 Additionally, the lack of input by the synod fathers in the composition of the drafting committee has created considerable unease. Members have been appointed, not elected, without consultation.  Likewise, anyone drafting anything at the level of the small circles should be elected, not appointed. In turn, these things have created a concern that the new procedures are not true to the traditional spirit and purpose of a synod.  It is unclear why these procedural changes are necessary.  A number of fathers feel the new process seems designed to facilitate predetermined results on important disputed questions. Finally and perhaps most urgently, various fathers have expressed concern that a synod designed to address a vital pastoral matter – reinforcing the dignity of marriage and family – may become dominated by the theological/doctrinal issue of Communion for the divorced and civilly remarried.  If so, this will inevitably raise even more fundamental issues about how the Church, going forward, should interpret and apply the Word of God, her doctrines and her disciplines to changes in culture.  The collapse of liberal Protestant churches in the modern era, accelerated by their abandonment of key elements of Christian belief and practice in the name of pastoral adaptation, warrants great caution in our own synodal discussions. Your Holiness, we offer these thoughts in a spirit of fidelity, and we thank you for considering them. Faithfully yours in Jesus Christ.

Magister's analysis follows:

http://chiesa.espresso.repubblica.it/articolo/1351154?eng=y

On the afternoon of that same Monday, October 5, during the first discussion in the assembly, Cardinal Pell and other synod fathers referred to some of the questions presented in the letter, without citing it.

Pope Francis was present and listening. And the next morning, on Tuesday, October 6, he spoke.

The text of these unscheduled remarks has not been made public, but only summarized verbally by Fr. Federico Lombardi and in writing by “L'Osservatore Romano.” As follows:

“The pontiff wanted to reaffirm that the current synod is in continuity with the one celebrated last year. With regard to the “Instrumentum laboris,” Francis emphasized that this results from the ‘Relatio synodi’ together with the contributions that came afterward, that is was approved by the post-synodal council - meeting in the presence of the pontiff - and that it is the basis for continuing the debate and discussions of the upcoming days. In this context, the contributions of the various linguistic groups take on essential importance. The pope also recalled that the three official documents of last year’s synod are the two discourses, initial and final, and the ‘Relatio synodi.’ The pontiff emphasized that Catholic doctrine on marriage has not been touched and then cautioned against the impression that the only problem of the synod is that of communion for the divorced, appealing against a reduction in the horizons of the synod.”

To this account from “L'Osservatore Romano,” Fr. Lombardi added that “the decisions of method were also shared and approved by the pope, and therefore cannot be brought back into discussion.”

From this it can be gathered that Francis has rejected the requests of the letter en bloc, apart from the marginal recommendation not to reduce the discussion only to “communion for the divorced.”

And he has not rejected them without a polemical jab, as afterward made known - in a tweet that has not been disowned - by the director of “La Civiltà Cattolica,” Antonio Spadaro, also present in the hall, according to whom the pope told the fathers “not to give in to the conspiracy hermeneutic, which is sociologically weak and spiritually unhelpful.”
All of this at the beginning of the synod. But toward the end of the first week of work, something else happened. Once again contrary to the wishes of the letter from the thirteen cardinals.

On Friday, October 9, Cardinal Luis Antonio G. Tagle, archbishop of Manila and president delegate of the synod, said out of the blue that with regard to the final relation, “we await the decision of the pope.”

And the next day, Fr. Lombardi clarified that “we do not yet have certainty on how the conclusion of the synod will take place, meaning if there will or will not be a final document. We will see if the pope gives precise indications.”

Incredible but true. With the synod in full swing, a question mark has suddenly been raised over the very existence of that “Relatio finalis” which figured in the programs as the goal toward which all of the work of the synod was finalized.

The “Relatio finalis,” in fact, was the subject of extensive remarks from the secretary general of the synod, Cardinal Lorenzo Baldisseri, in his official presentation on October 2:

That same day, Baldisseri also revealed that Pope Francis had appointed a commission of five cardinals and bishops precisely “for the elaboration of the final relation.”

On October 5, in the opening talk for the work of the synod, Baldisseri returned to illustrate in even greater detail the phases of elaboration and approval for the “Relatio”:

> Relazione del segretario generale

And he talked about it again in the assembly on the morning of October 6, right before the pope spoke.

Not to mention the official working calendar for the synod, which still assigns four full days, from October 21-24, to the writing of the “final relation,” to its presentation in the assembly, to the discussion and presentation of written observations, to its rewriting, to its re-presentation in the assembly and to the definitive vote:

> Calendario dei lavori

In the letter to Pope Francis, the thirteen cardinals expressed their hopes for the restoration of the procedure of past synods, which ended with votes, one by one, on “propositions” to be offered to the pope. Or that at least, in the absence of these propositions, there be a point-by-point vote on a “Relatio finalis” written by an elected commission, not one appointed from on high.

But if even the “Relatio” - as implied - is to be no more, the only product of the synod can be nothing other than a re-elaboration of that “Instrumentum laboris” which the thirteen signers of the letter maintain is incapable of acting as “the foundation of a final document,” partly because of its “various problematic sections,” which are of uncertain fidelity to doctrine.

Because it is true that the 270 synod fathers are working day after day to re-elaborate the “Instrumentum” from the ground up. But it is just as true that the rewriting of the text will be the prerogative of that commission entirely appointed by Pope Francis in which the innovators have an overwhelming majority, the opposite of what holds true in the assembly. And in a sprawling, rambling text like the “Instrumentum” - not telegraphic like the “propositions” of many past synods - it is much easier for a repeat of the 2014 synod to take place, with the inclusion of vague, kaleidoscopic formulas that are hard to reject in assembly with a straightforward vote.

“Catholic doctrine on marriage has not been touched,” Pope Francis pledged in referring to the entire conduct of the synod from 2014 to today, in response to the “concerns” of the thirteen cardinals of the letter.

But Cardinal Tagle, a prominent representative of the innovators, also said at the press conference on October 9, with visible satisfaction:

“The new method adopted by the synod has definitely caused a bit of confusion, but it is good to be confused once in a while. If things are always clear, then we might not be in real life anymore.”

Silencing of the Lambs at the #RosicaBlockParty

The Catholic faithful who have received their rights to raise issues of concern to the Church by Vatican II and articulated in Canon Law will not be silenced!

Father Thomas J. Rosica is the Vatican's English language spokesman and Executive Producer of the little watched and ill-regarded Salt + Light Television in Canada. All the English news on the Synod, unless spoken by a bishop or Cardinal, is filtered through this priest under the direction of Federico Lombardi, S.J.

Father Rosica has said that the Catholic Church suffers from a "ghetto mentality" and has supported "shared communion" according to this interview in the Windsor Star, whilst he was a Deacon. Have his views changed or have they simply progressed along a certain continuum?

We have evidence that the filtering is leaving certain things out. For example only "one or two" raised the issue of homosexuality, yet last Monday's press conference and the secular media that lapped it up made one think it was all they talked about.

Catholics reacted and took to Twitter and Facebook. The only outlets that they have. What does Father Rosica do? He goes on a blocking campaign and then accuses people of acting badly. Two of the people whom I know don't have a bad bone in their bodies and they were blocked. So who's telling the truth and who needs to go to Confession?

The hashtag "RosicaBlockParty and a Facebook "support group" are the result of frustrated Catholics; frustrated that the Vatican's communication expert, a man who sits on the Pontifical Council for Social Communications, won't!

This Catholic priest then takes to calling people names, like "toxic." Not a Christ-like thing to do. We need to change the language and reach out to those faithful Catholics in the peripheries who smell like sheep, but sheep who won't be silenced on the way to the slaughterhouse!

He blocks on Twitter thinking that will end it. He doesn't realise that all one needs to do is open Twitter in a browser that one is not signed in on or take out another account and resume contact. Pontifical Council on Social Communications, really?

Father Rosica, will not shut down the voice of the faithful who have seen through the sham of this Synod which is intended to soften the Church's words and teaching on sodomy and divorce and undermine the Sacraments.

It is not about the family. It is a sham that starts at the very top.

We will not allow it, even if it is from Francis himself. 

Archbishop Charles Chaput warns about devolution to Bishops' Conferences! It is a heresy to put an authority between the Pope and the Bishop - these malefactors must be stopped - Vox

Archbishop Chaput Warns About Dangers of Devolution to National Bishops’ Conferences (1227)

‘Brothers, we need to be very cautious in devolving important disciplinary and doctrinal issues to national and regional episcopal conferences,’ he told his fellow family synod fathers on Saturday.

by CNA/EWTN NEWS 10/11/2015 Comment

Archbishop Charles Chaput of Philadelphia speaks with CNA, Sept. 15, 2014.

– Joaquin Piero Perez/CNA.

VATICAN CITY — Archbishop Charles Chaput of Philadelphia spoke to the synod fathers on Saturday on the importance of precision in language, particularly regarding unity in diversity, and recalled the Protestant Reformation.

“Imprecise language leads to confused thinking,” the archbishop said Oct. 10 at the Vatican, giving “two examples that should cause us some concern”: “inclusive” and “unity in diversity.”

Read more: http://www.ncregister.com/daily-news/archbishop-chaput-warns-about-dangers-of-devolution-to-national-bishops-con/#ixzz3oJGLhHKX

Archbishop Gadecki: "Dialogue on human rights is the point of view of the Illuminati"

Following up on our post on the Masonic connection of Cardinal Danneels, the late Cardinal Martini and the rejoicing of international Freemasonry on the election of Pope Francis, some bishops are beginning to realize the influence of Freemasonry on the Synod.

Barona at Toronto Catholic Witness has another translation from Archbishop Stanislaw Gadecki

Toronto Catholic Witness translation: 

"Dialogue on human rights is the point of view of the Illuminati of the 19th century; where is the theology? Where are the Rights of God?  Instead of the work of creation, we have talk about ecology".

His full report can be found at:

http://torontocatholicwitness.blogspot.ca/2015/10/freemasonry-and-vatican-synod-fathers.html

I am obsessive (CAUTION AND WARNING - DESCRIPTIVE LANGUAGE!)

Someone sent me the message last night that I am "obsessive." It was a reference to posts on Facebook and Twitter about the Synod and what certain bishops and cardinals have said and what has been said by certain priests and more likely, one in particular.  

I am convicted and to paraphrase St. Paul, "I am obsessive for Christ and His Truth and His Church" and if that makes me a "fool for Christ," so be it.

I would rather be doing other things. Renovate parts of my house, watching a movie with Fox, reading, sitting in the garden. Instead, I blog so that you and others will know what is going on, so that in some way we can hope that this noise we are making is going to get through.

If if doesn't, and we fail; at least we will know that we did what we could.

A friend and his wife have told me that they have sworn off the news and the Internet during the Synod. Not that they do not want to know, they know too much, but for them, they have determined that the only solution is continual prayer. How wonderful and supportive of keeping the world ticking so that we can do this. Yes, prayer. For others, this. It is not one or the other, it is both and some are better at one or the other.

I would rather the Lord say to me, "you were a little hard in that battle but I forgive you because you did it for me and my little ones" then "why didn't you fight for me with the talents that I gave you, I do not know you."

My parents hated what happened after Vatican II, but they accepted it because they had no choice and they knew no better. Your parents or grandparents did the same thing. We cannot, we must not.

Look at what is happening.

Caution, descriptive language

This is what our Churchmen want you to accept as normal and "gifts" to offer to the Church. The insertion of the penis into the anus of another man to be used as a masturbatory force. Mutual masturbation. Oral sodomy  the insertion of the penis into the man's mouth often through the use of "poppers" amyl nitrate contained in room deodorizers to soften and open the muscles of the anus or throat. The swallowing of the semen of another man. Anal fisting. The expulsion of excrement is common during these actions. Well, what do you think happens? The oral licking of another man's anus. Do you know what a "slurp ramp" is? How about a "glory hole?" Felching? (you won't want to look that up) How much disease and death is a result of this immoral behaviour which when I was born was a criminal offense? 

Yes. that is some of what they do.

This is not about love. They are liars. This is not about the colour of his and his towels. Have you ever wondered about the order of their homes or the pillows or their cleanliness or fastidiousness? It is because they are trying to scrub it off but they cannot. Their subconscious knows the filth of the excrement and sin and they cannot clean it off until they wash it in the Blood of Christ.

Pervert protecting bishops and priests

These filthy perverts in the Catholic Church and media, many, many of them priests and bishops and cardinals are attempting to normalise what homosexuality is and what sodomites and lesbians do. They want to give them a "blessing," the state already calls it "marriage." They want to change the words of Our Lord Jesus Christ and two-thousand years of teaching and truth. 

This is what Bishop Bonny and Cardinal Danneels want you to accept as normal and other spokesman who would change language and mole priests such as Charamsa as well, that there is something wrong with you if you don't agree. They want to bless these relationships? They want to change the language? Are they all homosexuals themselves? They are certainly homosexualists!

No, I will not be silent. I would much rather blog about music and liturgy or shut it down all together.

I will obsess.

Pray for me. Pray for Barona and Steve Skojec and Ann Bardhardt and Hilary White and Mundabor and so many other bloggers and writers. Pray for Michael Voris and his team in Rome who are getting us as much of the news as they can. Pray for Edward Pentin. Pray for Cardinal Burke.

Do you understand? They are pillaging our Mother. They are turning Her upside down and calling evil, good.

Yes, I am obsessive and may I always be. May I always obsess for Our Lord Jesus Christ and His Church.

Until the day I die. 


Courtesy of Rorate Caeli blog, today.

Congregati sunt inimici nostri,

et gloriantur in virtute sua:

contere fortitudinem illorum, Domine, et disperge illos:

* Ut cognoscant, quia non est alius qui pugnet pro nobis,

nisi tu Deus noster.

Then Judas, and his brethren said: "Behold our enemies are discomfited: let us go up now to cleanse the holy places and to repair them." And all the army assembled together, and they went up into mount Sion. And they saw the sanctuary desolate, and the altar profaned, and the gates burnt, and shrubs growing up in the courts as in a forest, or on the mountains, and the chambers joining to the temple thrown down. And they rent their garments, and made great lamentation, and put ashes on their heads. And they fell face down to the ground on their faces, and they sounded with the trumpets of alarm, and they cried towards heaven.

Then Judas appointed men to fight against them that were in the castle, till they had cleansed the holy places. And he chose priests without blemish, whose will was set upon the law of God. And they cleansed the holy places, and took away the stones that had been defiled into an unclean place. And he considered about the altar of holocausts that had been profaned, what he should do with it. And a good counsel came into their minds, to pull it down: lest it should be a reproach to them, because the Gentiles had defiled it; so they threw it down. And they laid up the stones in the mountain of the temple in a convenient place, till there should come a prophet, and give answer concerning them.

Then they took whole stones according to the law, and built a new altar according to the former. And they built up the holy places, and the things that were within the temple: and they sanctified the temple, and the courts. And they made new holy vessels, and brought in the candlestick, and the altar of incense, and the table into the temple. And they put incense upon the altar, and lighted up the lamps that were upon the candlestick, and they gave light in the temple. And they set the loaves upon the table, and hung up the veils, and finished all the works that they had begun to make.

1 Maccabees, 4:36-51

(Lessons for Matins for this Sunday for the Roman Breviary - 20th After Pentecost, 2nd in October)

If you as a Catholic watch pornography, you are responsible

From Hilary White at What's Up With The Synod:

Strong language and adult themes warning.
We’re going to talk about what homosexual acts really are, so read this after the kids have gone to bed. Ann’s choice of language here is deliberate. Just to head off the expected criticism: it is not “pornographic” but merely factually, one might say, medically descriptive. I have long been arguing that one of the reasons there is such a vast acceptance of the “nice gay men” movement is that no one is willing to actually talk clearly about what they do.

The homosexualist ideological movement has been very, very careful to make sure they restrict their rhetoric to being about “love” and “rights” and never, ever mention the gruesome realities in the “polite company” of the straight world they are attempting to evangelize. What is very commonly talked about in their own world, in their magazines and websites, is in public carefully shrouded. But I have read homosexual literature, and folks, they’re a LOT more … straightforward among their own constituents than Ann has been here.

When Ann and I talked about putting this article on WUWTS, we briefly worried about how people would react. But this isn’t the Remnant, and it isn’t LifeSiteNews. And this is an emergency, so it’s time for all the special snowflakes to grow up, and quick.

Right now, the men in Rome who are attempting to move the Church towards acceptance of sodomy know full well that if they talked about what they’re really talking about, the Catholic world would recoil in horror. The whole thing would be over in an hour.

But they won’t. So we have to.

HJMW

Read it here.

http://whatisupwiththesynod.com/index.php/2015/10/10/ann-barnhardt-on-the-vast-and-sudden-acceptance-of-the-abuse-of-the-posterior-fundament/

Pope Francis, Danneels, Martini, St. Maximillian Kolbe and the Freemason Connection with the Synod on the Family

Godfried Danneels, a Cardinal of the Holy Catholic Church who has presided over its collapse in Belgium, conspired with others such as Kasper to undermine Benedict XVI and elect Jorge Bergoglio as Pope at what became known as the St. Galen mafia. He did this together with the late Carlo Maria Martini former Archbishop of Milan who stated that the Catholic Church was "200 years out of date" and supported changing the Church's treatment of the divorced. On Martini's death, the Grand Orient Lodge of Italy claimed Martini as one of their own. 

Over eight years ago, Tradition in Action, captured this image of the same Godfried Danneels who must have realised how damaging this would be to his agenda and requested it be removed. Danneels admitted that he wore the appropriate robes in the Lodge.

The translation of the above is as follows:

Not too strong a word to call this historical.
 Although it's true that Daneels had given a conference in a Masonic Temple in a white ritual robe, it's the first time that, as primate of Belgium, he had an exchange with a Grand Master of a Masonic Obedience [group of lodges] in the form of Bartholomeeusen, Grand Master of the Grand Orient of Belgium. The general public was not mistaken [that it was historical], and crowded into the Le Soir forum where not a single seat was left empty.
 Of course, this was not about settling some kind of conflict on a mat [...]. The debate, moderated by journalist Eddy Caekelberghs, was conducted under the theme From Anathema to Dialogue. Here we discovered two very different men (one rather dry, the other with a fuller personality) ready to encounter one another, to listen to one another, while at the same time affirming their differences. They were eye to eye, however, on several themes, such as rejecting the influence of religion on the political sphere. The Cardinal thus admitted to totally understanding why secrecy surrounds the works of Lodges.
 People wondered how the two participants would use their titles. The Cardinal spoke of “Mister Grand Master” and the Grand Master used “Mister Cardinal”. One can assume then that the titles of Most Serene Grand Master and Your Eminence [Monseigneur] would only be used by their... flocks.
 After the debate, the Cardinal and the Grand Master went together to [a couple of Catholic book stands] and then to [a Masonic stand] where the GOB had some of its books displayed. The Cardinal left with the latest publications of the GOB, including the title “Becoming a Freemason at the Grand Orient of Belgium”, as well as the very beautiful work “The Treasures of the Temple”, all offered by Bartholomeeusen.
 This debate will be broadcast next week on radio [...], and on TV [...] on... Easter Monday.
 (2008)

Michael Hichborn of The Lepanto Institute writes about St. Maximilian Kolbe witnessing a Masonic parade in 1917 which took place in St. Peter's Square in Rome. Signs proclaimed that "Satan must reign in the Vatican, the Pope must be his slave."

Hicbhorn goes to great lengths to state that there is no accusation that Jorge Bergoglio is a Freemason or is sympathetic to their agenda. Neither does this writer accuse the Pope of being a Freemason.

Upon his election to the Papacy, Jorge Bergoglio was praised by the Grand Lodge of Italy. On Thursday, 21 March 2013 in  Rome, Italy, the Grand Master of the Grand Orient of Italy expressed his joy regarding the election of Pope Francis.  

"With the election of Pope Francis nothing will ever be the same again. With Pope Francis, nothing will be more as it was before. It is a clear choice of fraternity for a Church of dialogue, which is not contaminated by the logic and temptations of temporal power"

"A man of the poor far away from the Curia. Fraternity and the desire to dialogue were his first concrete words. Perhaps nothing in the Church will be as it was before. Our hope is that the pontificate of Francis, the Pope who 'comes from the end of the world' can mark the return to the Church-Word instead of the Church-Institution, promoting an open dialogue with the contemporary world, with believers and non-believers, following the springtime of Vatican II." These were the comments of Gustavo Raffi, Grand Master of the Grand Orient of Italy, at the beginning of the pontificate of Francis, in the world Jorge Mario Bergoglio.

"The Jesuit who is close to the least ones of history," Raffi continues, "has the great opportunity to show the world the face of a Church that must recover the announcement of a new humanity, not the weight of an institution that closes itself off in defense of its own privileges. Bergoglio knows real life and will remember the lesson of one of his favorite theologians, Romano Guardini, for whom the truth of love cannot be stopped.

"The simple cross he wore on his white cassock," concludes the Grand Master of Palazzo Giustiniani, "lets us hope that a Church of the people will re-discover its capacity to dialogue with all men of good will and with Freemasonry, which, as the experience of Latin America teaches us, works for the good and progress of humanity, as shown by Bolivar, Allende and José Martí, to name only a few. This is the 'white smoke' that we expect from the Church of our times."  

HOMOSEXUAL PROPAGANDA DISTRIBUTED AT SYNOD - CONFIRMED BY POLISH ARCHBISHOP STANISLAW GADECKI!

BREAKING NOW!

Barona at Toronto Catholic Witness is monitoring reports on the Synod from Poland and it is an entirely different story than what we are getting in English.

Please friends. Use your Email, Facebook, Twitter -- whatever you can do. Send these reports to every priest and bishop you know. Wake up your Catholic friends who are still asleep. 

We are in a battle. A battle for Jesus Christ and His Truth and His Church!

Here is his the full report from Barona:

http://torontocatholicwitness.blogspot.ca/2015/10/bombshell-pro-homosexual-propaganda-was.html

Saturday, 10 October 2015

BOMBSHELL! PRO-HOMOSEXUAL propaganda was ALLOWED to be distributed at the Synod

Archbishop Stanislaw Gadecki continues his valiant defense of Holy Mother Church by informing us that during the Afternoon Session of October 7th, 2015, the bishops in his Group noted thatpro-homosexual propaganda was being distributed at the Synod. 

Who is allowing this? 

How did this pro-homosexual propaganda get in? 

Just who are the homosexualists in the Vatican? Are they practicing homosexuals? 

Are they Cardinals? Archbishops? Are they bishops,  mid-level homosexual infiltrators like the self-outed Monsignor Krzysztof Charamsa? 

Just how many are involved in this powerful, malignant homo-lobby? 

Catholics have a right to know!

The screenshot of the Archbishop's blog: 

Toronto Catholic Witness translation:

"One of the Catholic publications that was distributed during the Synod, was written by women theologians justifying homosexual unions" 

Proof of Synod manipulation - who is behind this? Coming shortly!

How much more distressing can it get when the obvious is set right before us. That the Pope himself appears to be manipulating the outcome of the Synod.

A 50% vote left on matters in the Instrumentum Laboris leftover from the previous Synod require a two-thirds vote to get them out.

http://rorate-caeli.blogspot.com/2015/10/the-sick-game-of-synod-they-manipulate.html#more

Let us pray that next week, the battle will break out into the open.