UPDATE:
As noted below, I was sent the notice of this as it appeared then at archtoronto.org. After contacting Neil MacCarthy, Director of Communications, seeing the problem, had it removed and I confirmed it. He did the right thing. Alas, it appears it was not stopped from going to parishes and being printed in bulletins. Well, Neil? What do you have to say for yourself and the deception? Was I duped? Were you? Was ++Francis Leo? Or, all you all culpable and at least we know where we stand?
Not a good start!
Reports from readers that it has appeared in numerous church bulletins including that of the former Chaplain for the Extraordinary Form Mass.
Readers in Toronto, send links of the parishes where it has been published.
St. Clare of Assisi Woodbridge
St. Aidan, Scarborough
Happy Sunday!
The bulletin for this Sunday in Toronto's St. Michael's Cathedral features a post promoting the Rosica lecture to take place at the Jesuit Manresa retreat centre. In itself, there is nothing wrong with a session for parents of those suffering from same-sex attraction or gender dysphoria. The point is, the labelling by using the alphabet moniker. The Church does not label people by their sin. People have dignity as men and women, there are no others. This is the point of the post below.
FULL DISCLOSURE:
Last week, a Toronto priest sent me a notice of this, it was on his diocesan update and a web page at archtoronto.org. Seeing it, I wrote to Archdiocesan Director of Public Relations Neil MacCarthy and questioned whether this was the new breeze of Archbishop Francis Leo or a "chancery rat." Neil confirmed it was a "rat" and that Archbishop Leo was not aware and the post was removed. Now, we find that in Archbishop Leo's own Cathedral's bulletin, the alphabet mafia has won.
As I wrote to Neil, is it not bad enough for Catholics on a daily basis to be assaulted by this demonic symbol, be it the alphabet labels ever expanding or the abominable abuse of God's rainbow? Can we not even find peace away from it in the Temple of God?
Is this in the bulletin because a secretary chose to do it?
Was it the Rector's decision?
If not, does the Rector know, does he proof read the bulletin?
Was it the Rector's decision?
If not, does the Rector know, does he proof read the bulletin?
Does Archbishop Leo know? Did he sanction it?
The Vigil Novus Ordo Mass for Ascension Thursday transferred to Sunday on Saturday night is in just over an hour. Will they pull the bulletin?
As for Tom Rosica, if the litigious bully and serial plagiarist wishes to leave the bedpans of Presentation House he can be assured this blogger will be writing.
If Archbishop Francis Leo was not aware of this and did not approve, then he knows even more now where he must act quickly to assert his authority. If he did approve or does not act, then we know a little bit more of our new Shepherd and what it means.
3 comments:
An opportunity for parents "to grow closer to God"? By celebrating sodomy which God hates and punishes severely?
One might reasonably ask what the "experienced priest" is experienced in. What an odd phrasing.
Ah, we know it is likely the poorer scenario is likely. When you get a joy-faced bishop, it's not looking good for Catholicism and for Catholic morality and teaching. Hopefully that will be proven wrong in this case, but one thinks of statistics and probabilities.
We know what our church is filled with, and headed by.
Thomas Rosica's association with this group and promotion of an evil ideology (Pope John Paul II's own words) is even worse than his engaging in serial plagiarism. A brief review of the lay facilitator comments indicates that this "retreat" will not be one of helping Catholics who struggle with same-sex attraction to leave holy, chaste lives; but something else.
After all, the lay facilitator has claimed the Church does not "welcome his son at the Eucharistic table". This is a blatant falsehood. No person, irregardless of their sin, is unwelcome to be a living member of Christ's Body; of receiving the Eucharist. But there is a condition: one must renounce, confess one's sins and receive sacramental absolution.
So we are left with the ambiguity of Thomas Rosica's "retreat" being but another diabolical attempt to change the unchangeable:
"...God gave them over to degrading passions; for their women exchanged the natural function for that which is unnatural, and in the same way also the men abandoned the natural function of the woman and burned in their desire toward one another, men with men committing indecent acts and receiving in their own persons the due penalty of their error" (Romans 1:27)
Post a Comment