German Heseriarch Cardinal Marx of the pornography producing German bishops is hosting lavish parties for Cardinals and Bishops of the Synod

In complete and utter defiance and a display of hypocisy when the Pope desires his bishops be humble and get out of their palaces, the German Heseriarch Marx has been hosting lavish dinner parties for other Cardinals.

Is he lobbying them to take up his heterodox positions?

Perhaps, he is showing him the pornography collection from the publishing company owned by the German bishops.

Edward Pentin reports:

Cardinal Marx Hosting Extravagant Dinners for Synod Fathers?

Posted by Edward Pentin on Saturday Oct 17th, 2015 at 12:49 PM

Cardinal Reinhard Marx, who is attending the Synod on the Family as president of the German bishops’ conference, is allegedly holding extravagant dinners for synod fathers at a multi-million euro villa in Rome owned by the archdiocese of Munich.

Around 20 bishops from a number of countries attended a lavish dinner at an archdiocesan-owned guesthouse located on Via delle Medaglia d’Oro last Sunday.

According to an informed source, there was such an abundance of food “the bishops’ stomachs were hardly able to take a break.” Another similar banquet is planned tomorrow.

http://m.ncregister.com/blog/edward-pentin/cardinal-marx-hosting-extravagent-dinners-for-synod-fathers#.ViKEMmopBxs

Heresiarch Bishop and Judas Priest Judas Raúl Vera López - calls sodomites "our saviours" supports abortion and homosexualty, Is he one?

Judas Priest named, Raúl Vera López

On October 7, I was busy organising the Mass and Schola for the Feast of Our Lady of the Rosary, I missed this piece of heretical homosexualist bile from a heresiarch from Mexico, an apparent Bishop but just another Judas Priest named, Raúl Vera López. 

Tantumblogo has just written this up and I recommend you visit him at A Blog for Dallas Area Catholics.

López has clearly lost the faith, if he ever had it. Imagine, calling sodomites and lesbians, "our saviours." 

What blasphemy!

Is he a sodomite? Do our Mexican friends have any evidence?

López has a history as documented at LifeSiteNews for supporting homosexualist causes and abortion!

https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/mexican-bishop-under-vatican-investigation-for-supporting-pro-homosexual-or

https://www.lifesitenews.com/archives/search

I'm sorry for bringing you all bad news; what choice do I have, what choice do you have? Do not develop fatigue. Do not resist the knowledge of what is happening at the and of these traitorous cardinals, bishops and priests. You must wake up to what is coming. You must wake up your Catholic friends who are still asleep. The alarm we send has nothing to do with not having faith in Our Lord's words that the "gates of Hell will not prevail." It is because of those very words that we do this.

Here is the money quote:

The day’s proceedings were concluded by the most anticipated and important speaker of all due to the position he holds, the Dominican Bishop Raúl Vera López from the Mexican diocese of Saltillo, known for his views that are openly in contrast with Catholic doctrine, in favour of the rights claimed by LGBT and promotion of abortion. The bishop started by declaring that he felt honoured and privileged to be breaking new ground together with the LGBT community. He then praised the skill and organisational capacity of the gay rights movement, likening the LGBT community to the tiny ants in a Mexican proverb which, through their perseverance and hard work, manage to defeat monsters far greater than themselves: “those who are small and well organised overcome the monsters; you are well organised and you will win.”

https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/lgbt-pre-synod-conference-gets-strong-episcopal-backing

Heresiarch Cardinal Reinhard Marx - Conscience should dictate - rejects Humanae Vitae

Heresiarch's Cupich, the Judas Priest of Chicago's statement yesterday to LifeSiteNews on conscience seems to have had its motivation in the German Heresiarch Cardinal Marx's Wednesday comments. 

Christine Niles at ChurchMilitant is reporting that Marx's words are his "boldest statement yet on Communion to the divorced and remarried" (without a decree of nullity).

Marx said on Wednesday:

"The Church should seriously consider the possibility — based on each individual case and not in a generalizing way — to admit civilly divorced and remarried believers to the sacrament of Penance and Holy Communion when the shared life in the canonically valid marriage definitively has failed and the marriage cannot be annulled, the liabilities from this marriage have been resolved, the fault for breaking up the marital life-bond was regretted and the sincere will exists to live the second civil marriage in faith and to educate children in the Faith."

"We need to make more room for the conscience of the bride and married couples in our preaching and our pastoral outreach. It is certainly the task of the Church to form the consciences of the faithful, but the judgment of conscience of the people cannot be replaced. This is especially true for situations where the partners who experience a conflict in values must make a decision about whether to be open to the procreation of children vs. the preservation of their marriage and family life when the two conflict with each other."

 "Can we evaluate sexual acts in a second civil marriage exclusively as adultery?"

Pure, unadulterated heresy and promotion of sacrilege and a mind as warped from Catholic thought from the rot of the pornographic empire of the German bishops.

Not only has this heresiarch renounced Humanae Vitae on the matter of "procreation of children," he has given a clear rejection of Gaudium et Spes, the Pastoral Constitution of the Churchin the Modern World, promulgated by His Holiness Pope Paul VI on December 7, 1965

 16. In the depths of his conscience, man detects a law which he does not impose upon himself, but which holds him to obedience. Always summoning him to love good and avoid evil, the voice of conscience when necessary speaks to his heart: do this, shun that. For man has in his heart a law written by God; to obey it is the very dignity of man; according to it he will be judged.(9) Conscience is the most secret core and sanctuary of a man. There he is alone with God, Whose voice echoes in his depths.(10) In a wonderful manner conscience reveals that law which is fulfilled by love of God and neighbor.(11) In fidelity to conscience, Christians are joined with the rest of men in the search for truth, and for the genuine solution to the numerous problems which arise in the life of individuals from social relationships. Hence the more right conscience holds sway, the more persons and groups turn aside from blind choice and strive to be guided by the objective norms of morality. Conscience frequently errs from invincible ignorance without losing its dignity. The same cannot be said for a man who cares but little for truth and goodness, or for a conscience which by degrees grows practically sightless as a result of habitual sin.

Pope Francis is derelict in his duty as Bishop of Rome and Pope of the Universal Church. There was a time that a cardinal who made such a statement would be stripped of his scarlet and sent packing to a monastery.

There is one person that can fix this mess and it is Francis who must abide by doctrine and tradition. 

Heresiarch Cupich, is this what you want to accompany? To where would that be?

Vox's artwork to cover the posteriors

“If people come to a decision in good conscience then our job is to help them move forward and to respect that. The conscience is inviolable and we have to respect that when they make decisions, and I’ve always done that.”
“I think that gay people are human beings too and they have a conscience. And my role as a pastor is to help them to discern what the will of God is by looking at the objective moral teaching of the Church and yet, at the same time, helping them through a period of discernment to understand what God is calling them to at that point,” 
"It’s for everybody. I think that we have to make sure that we don’t pigeonhole one group as though they are not part of the human family, as though there’s a different set of rules for them. That would be a big mistake.” Blase Cupich

Actually, Blase, they need to abide by the same rules that I do. 

Ignores Second Vatican Council

In response to Heresiarch Cupich's statement, a priest friend wrote reminded me of this and provides some further comment

PASTORAL CONSTITUTION ON THE CHURCH IN THE MODERN WORLD  (“GAUDIUM ET SPES”) PROMULGATED BY HIS HOLINESS, POPE PAUL VI ON DECEMBER 7, 1965

“16. In the depths of his conscience, man detects a law which he does not impose upon himself, but which holds him to obedience. Always summoning him to love good and avoid evil, the voice of conscience when necessary speaks to his heart: do this, shun that. For man has in his heart a law written by God; to obey it is the very dignity of man; according to it he will be judged.(9)
 Conscience is the most secret core and sanctuary of a man. There he is alone with God, Whose voice echoes in his depths.(10)

In a wonderful manner conscience reveals that law which is fulfilled by love of God and neighbor.(11)

 Father comments

In fidelity to conscience, Christians are joined with the rest of men in the search for truth, and for the genuine solution to the numerous problems which arise in the life of individuals from social relationships.
 Hence the more right conscience holds sway, the more persons and groups turn aside from blind choice and strive to be guided by the objective norms of morality.
 Conscience frequently errs from invincible ignorance without losing its dignity.
 The same cannot be said for a man who cares but little for truth and goodness, or for a conscience which by degrees grows practically sightless as a result of habitual sin. ”
 FOOTNOTES
(9.)    Cf. Rom. 2:15-16.
(10.) Cf. Pius XII, Radio address on the correct formation of a Christian conscience in the young, March 23, 1952: AAS (1952), p. 271.
(11.) Cf. Matt. 22:37-40; Gal. 5:14.

As Father Ray Blake asked, "Who let this man make his first Holy Communion?"

Postscript

Borrowed from Hilary White at "What's Up With the Synod?" The opening hymn from the next CupichMass

A homosexualist bishop in the Ukrainian Canadian Eparchy! Bishop David Motiuk - outed from the Cupich School of Judas Priests!

Transgender activist claims Catholic bishop supported transition to female: permitted to teach Sunday School

 Homosexuality , Marni Parnas

EDMONTON, Alberta, October 16, 2015 (LifeSiteNews) -- A biologically male transgender activist who says he is now female is claiming that his transition is not only supported by his local Ukrainian Catholic bishop, but that he has been encouraged to continue receiving Holy Communion and has been assured that when he dies, he will receive the Christian Rite of Burial as a ‘she.’

https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/transgender-activist-claims-catholic-bishop-supported-transition-to-female

Like white on rice

Wherefore, O man, you who sit in the Papal throne

“Listen, O man, to the one who loves the power of discernment, so that He Himself has established the great instrument of uprightness to fight against evil. But you are not exercising this faculty when you do not root out the evil which seeks to choke the good. Rather, you are allowing evil to raise itself up arrogantly.”

“…Wherefore, O man, you who sit in the Papal throne, you despise God when you embrace evil. For in failing to speak out against the evil of those in your company, you are certainly not rejecting evil. Rather, you are kissing it. And so the whole world is being led away by unstable error” (Baird, Joseph L. and Ehrman, Radd. 

The Letters of Hildegard of Bingen, Volume I. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1994, p.42). 

Blase Cupich, Judas Priest

Not a day goes by without another bishop coming out and revealing what they really think. In a breaking story, LifeSiteNews has interviewed Blase Cupich, Archbishop of Chicago who reveals his heretical belief in the primacy of conscience over doctrine and faith and his willingness to cause sacrilege to the Holy Eucharist.

Blase Cupich's words are heretical. In an earlier time, a Pope would have already sanctioned him. Yet, it was this Pope that promoted him to the See of Chicago and invited him as a participant at the Synod. How dare he include the "elderly" in the same sentence as sodomites and lesbians. 

In his own words:

Archbishop Blase Cupich of Chicago — who is participating in the Synod of the Family at Pope Francis’ personal invitation — said at a press scrum in the Vatican press office this afternoon that the conscience is "inviolable" and that he believes divorced and remarried couples could be permitted to receive the sacraments, if they have "come to a decision" to do so "in good conscience" - theological reasoning that he indicated in response to a follow-up question would also apply to gay couples.
“In Chicago I visit regularly with people who feel marginalized: the elderly, the divorced and remarried, gay and lesbian individuals and also couples. I think that we really need to get to know what their life is like if we’re going to accompany them,” he said.
When asked to give a concrete example of how he would accompany the divorced and remarried in their desire to receive the sacraments, Cupich replied: “If people come to a decision in good conscience then our job is to help them move forward and to respect that. The conscience is inviolable and we have to respect that when they make decisions, and I’ve always done that.”
When asked by LifeSiteNews if the notion of accompanying people to the sacraments who had a clear indication of conscience to do so also applied to gay couples in the Church who wish to receive Communion, Cupich indicated an affirmative answer.
“I think that gay people are human beings too and they have a conscience. And my role as a pastor is to help them to discern what the will of God is by looking at the objective moral teaching of the Church and yet, at the same time, helping them through a period of discernment to understand what God is calling them to at that point,” he said. “It’s for everybody. I think that we have to make sure that we don’t pigeonhole one group as though they are not part of the human family, as though there’s a different set of rules for them. That would be a big mistake.”

Blase Cupich is a disgrace to the priesthood and the Church, Under his logic, as long as a murderer or a rapist or a producer of child pornography or a thief does so in good conscience, then the Eucharist is theirs.

There is a set of rules for Holy Communion. Confession, penance and firm purpose of amendment. Where does this man wish to accompany them, on the road to Hell? We all know they are human beings and don't need to be lectured by this apostate bishop.

Let all these Judas Priests come out, one by one. Let them all come out into the light so we can see them and look upon their wicked and deformed faces and minds and hearts conformed to a modernist heresy and not to Christ.

Is Blase Cupich a homosexual? Is he being blackmailed? What is in his closet?

The Synod is a sham. Pope Francis is responsible.

The entire report can be read at: 

https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/archbishop-cupich-lays-out-pathway-for-gay-couples-to-receive-communion

Synod and homosexuality. The word of St. Paul, uncensored

Sandro Magister on his blog notes that the Mass readings this week are of St. Paul whom Dew wants to put away and Rosica praises him for it.

Do these men have no fear of God?

http://magister.blogautore.espresso.repubblica.it/



Synod and homosexuality. The word of St. Paul, uncensored

Since the synod fathers have begun to discuss the third part of the basic document, the one with the most controversial points, the weekday Mass is being read every day a passage of the Letter to the Romans, the Apostle Paul's theological masterpiece.
Also here, that coincidence. Just like the Sunday opening of the Synod, on October 4, when in all Catholic churches in the world sounded during Mass the words of Jesus in Mark's Gospel: "Let no man separate what God has joined together."
Now, however, the coincidence of the synod and missal has to do with the indissolubility of marriage, but with another of the hot issues: homosexuality.
Tuesday, 12 October in the missal has read the passage in chapter 1 of Romans running from verse 16 to verse 25.
There Paul, stating that "the world's creation onward, the invisible things [God] can be understood and perceived in the things that are made, even his eternal power and divinity", calls "inexcusable" those who "while knowing God, did not give him glory nor were thankful as God, but they became futile in their thinking and their senseless minds is obscured. "
And it continues:
"Professing themselves to be wise, they became fools and exchanged the glory of the incorruptible God into an image made like corruptible man and of birds and four-footed animals and creeping things. Wherefore God also gave them up in the lusts of their hearts, to dishonor their own bodies between themselves ".
At the Mass on Tuesday 12 reading and you stop at this point. And the next day is taken up with Chapter 2 of Romans.
But the chapter 1 of the Pauline letter did not end there, and if the missal omits modestly that piece, the synod fathers can not not know what it contains.
Paul goes on to explaining why word for word what he meant by that first reference to '"impurities" of those who "dishonor their own bodies between themselves".
That's because the terrifying final chapter 1 of Romans
"Therefore God gave them over to degrading passions; their women exchanged the natural use for what is against nature. Likewise also the men, leaving the natural use of the woman, burned in their lust for one another, committing acts shameless men with men and receiving in themselves the penalty of their error which s'addiceva. And since they did not acknowledge God, God gave them at the mercy of a depraved mind, to do those things that are unworthy, heaped like are all manner of wickedness, evil, covetousness, malice; full of envy, murder, strife, deceit, malice; defamatory, slanderers, haters of God, insolent, haughty, boastful, inventors of evil , disobedient to parents, foolish, faithless, heartless, without mercy. And despite knowing the judgment of God, that they which commit such things are worthy of death, not only do them but approve those who practice them. "
If this St Paul says, it is evident that the synod fathers predisposed to changing paradigms doctrinal and pastoral of the Church on homosexuality have some difficulty to harmonize their proposals with which this is still the "Word of God", as proclaimed in placed at the end of every reading.
But it is also becoming increasingly clear that in large sectors of the Church's perception of homosexual practice as sin be slipping away as a relic of the past. Pace of the Catechism of the Catholic Church, not that of a time but the "new" in 1997, which still includes "sin of Sodom" among the four sins that "cry out to Heaven", together with voluntary homicide, all 'oppression of the poor and the fraud of the workers' wages.
Of course, who proposes that homosexual practice, someone can always be argued that such approval is "praeter Scripturam" outside except against the Holy Scriptures, as he said in 2011 the Waldensian pastor and theologian Paolo Ricca standing up against his brother Protestants who had just given the green light to "marriages" between same sex.
But also no shortage in the Catholic theologians and bishops who are quick to explain how St. Paul should not be taken literally, but interpreted as "context" of his time, influenced by prejudices of "patriarchal" and "contempt ethnic-religious" today unacceptable.
The "shadow synod" Franco-German kept at the Gregorian University last May, in which the protagonists sit now in the synod true, argued precisely this modern re-reading of Sacred Scripture, in the light of contemporary thought

Archbishop Stanisław Gądecki speaks truth and clarity - others speak lies and evil

"I was at the Synod in 2014. A few at that time raised the postulate to give Holy Communion to the divorced living in new unions and for active homosexuals.  [But] the purpose of a Synod is to confirm the teaching of the Saviour. – Archbishop Stanisław Gądecki"

Translation by Barona