tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20981956.post7665161087053450050..comments2024-03-27T11:26:55.051-04:00Comments on Vox Cantoris: Raymond Cardinal Burke on Bergoglio's evil action - the motu proprio Traditionis CustodesUnknownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger8125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20981956.post-53781497946227917862021-08-05T05:38:35.396-04:002021-08-05T05:38:35.396-04:00 Singing for the Masons
Fr.John Zuhsldorf has pos... Singing for the Masons<br /><br />Fr.John Zuhsldorf has posted Peter Kwasniewski’s talk at Denver on his blog and this is appreciated by the liberals and Masons.Kwasniewski and Zuhsldorf interpret Vatican Council II as a break with Tradition, a break with ‘the true Church’.<br /><br />They are not saying that without the false premise, LG 8, LG 16 etc do not contradict the strict interpretation of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS).<br /><br />Kwasniewski does not interpret Vatican Council II as a continuation with Catholic Tradition, for example, the Athanasius Creed which says all need Catholic faith for salvation.He supports the political Left interpretation of Vatican Council II, as does the Bologna School of Alberto Melloni and Fr. Z.<br /><br />Similarly the Lodges are pleased with Don Pietro Leone ‘s reports on the webblog Rorate Caeili. Leone is unable to see LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, etc in Vatican Council II as referring to invisible cases in 2021.He projects Unitatis Redintigratio 3 as an exception to the past ecumenism of return to the Catholic Church. So he implies that UR 3 is physically visible case in 1965-2021. An invisible person could not be an exception to the past exclusivist ecclesiology of the Catholic Church.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20981956.post-59219654605216808992021-07-25T04:31:53.488-04:002021-07-25T04:31:53.488-04:00Anonymous at 9.22am
But once again you, like Card...Anonymous at 9.22am<br /><br />But once again you, like Cardinal Burke, are missing the great elephant in the room: in canon law Bergoglio is not the pope. Ergo he is an antipope supported by a treacherous episcopacy, ergo he has zero authority in the Church and all of his actions, pronouncements are null.<br /><br />Now Burke has gone on record as questioning the validity of Benedict’s resignation. He is a canon lawyer. Yet he still supports the antipope, Why? He is a learned man? Is he compromised? <br /><br />The Mass cannot be valid, nay it is sacrilegious, if said in union with an antipope. No graces can flow from the sacrament. So, as throughout all of history, who the pope is determines where the Church is. Paul Dalenoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20981956.post-42346190296930830312021-07-24T15:34:11.765-04:002021-07-24T15:34:11.765-04:00It was too much for me to read. I have read Quo Pr...It was too much for me to read. I have read Quo Primum of Pope St. Pius V instead and it's enough, everything was clear. Why there so much attention spent by Catholics on what evil said or what evil did?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20981956.post-70079445892965514752021-07-24T11:20:37.506-04:002021-07-24T11:20:37.506-04:00Cardinal Burke's integrity took a wallop when ...Cardinal Burke's integrity took a wallop when he didn't follow up on his promise to call an imperfect council to sort out the usurpation of the Throne of Peter by St. Gallen Group Mafia following untold coercion from them, Deutsch Bank, Obama Administration, NWO etc. &, of course, AL a hideous papal exhortation that the Apostate & Idolater had no authority to make. This Motu Proprio & other blasphemous statements inc. "I am the Pope, I do not need to give reasons for any of my decisions." are not Catholic (like JB himself) & as JB is an Antipope & the Destroyer St. Francis of Assisi warned us of, he has no papal authority whatsoever. It's truly heartbreaking to hear our prelates, priests & dumb laity call him The Holy Father. What a slap in the face to the Holy Ghost & PBXVI the sitting Pope whom He presides over.<br /><br />By the perfidery of our Hierarchy who installed JB in the PO we are now at the precipice to Hell. The Gates of Hell are looking back at us, taunting Christ's faithful through our grossly effeminate, idolatrous & thieving prelates who, through the last gasps of JB have now issued a new satanic motu proprio falsely claiming they intend to abrogate TLM, something PBXVI said could not be done & by his SP told priests that they can still celebrate it. The greatest mistake was in not mandating TLM for all parishes worldwide as cruel NO Bishops refused obedience to The Holy Father Benedict & by nefarious means excluded most of the world from attending it. <br /><br />It is time for Cardinals Burke, Mueller, Sarah, Eijk etc. to stand tall & restore the OHCAC to its fitting place in the world by ridding it of the Ape Church which has infested it since VII, a pastoral non-binding council which suddenly became an ecumenical council with binding power that has completely destroyed the image & holiness of Mother Church whom they will soon call Pachamama.Ana Milanhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13614286775064340959noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20981956.post-83442630563963709322021-07-24T10:01:56.952-04:002021-07-24T10:01:56.952-04:00Good for you Vox for allowing the posting of a rad...Good for you Vox for allowing the posting of a radical ultramontanist, one who confuses Christ with the Pope. What they lack in charity, they lack further in the poverty of their cathechesis.<br /><br />It seems everyone with an opinion has something to say about TC these days. All good; immediate reactions have their value as far it goes, and some have been excellent. I don't remember if it was you that linked to the piece by Sebastian Morello in the European Conservative. It is excellent, and reveals the dangers of Revolution and its destructive impact on the Church.<br /><br />I don't have enough space to comment on EMJ. He is both spectacularly brilliant and spectacularly awful.<br />Phineasnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20981956.post-18959156512985207012021-07-24T09:22:06.296-04:002021-07-24T09:22:06.296-04:00I disagree. It would be lovely to this layperson&#...I disagree. It would be lovely to this layperson's ideas of what needs to happen, for Cardinals to denounce Bergoglio by whatever terms necessary which would mean he would be removed from the Chair of St. Peter. It does not appear this will happen. I've criticized the dubia Cardinals including Cardinal Burke, in the past. The lack of willingness to confront Bergoglio and defend the church, is a real problem that has not helped. But here Cardinal Burke has spoken plainly and given lots of armament for the counter to the vile edict from Francis. We ought to be able to identify when we are being strengthened with information.<br /><br />"It must be remembered that, from a theological point of view, every valid celebration of a sacrament, by the very fact that it is a sacrament, is also, beyond any ecclesiastical legislation, an act of worship and, therefore, also a profession of faith. In that sense, it is not possible to exclude the Roman Missal, according to the UA, as a valid expression of the lex orandi and, therefore, of the lex credendi of the Church. It is a question of an objective reality of divine grace which cannot be changed by a mere act of the will of even the highest ecclesiastical authority.".<br /><br />Cardinal Burke also expressed the rightful limit on what Francis can actually do in his role as pope.<br /><br />15. But can the Roman Pontiff juridically abrogate the UA? The fullness of power (plenitudo potestatis) of the Roman Pontiff is the power necessary to defend and promote the doctrine and discipline of the Church. It is not “absolute power” which would include the power to change doctrine or to eradicate a liturgical discipline that has been alive in the Church since the time of Pope Gregory the Great and even earlier. The correct interpretation of Article 1 cannot be the denial that the UA is an ever-vital expression of “the lex orandi of the Roman Rite.” Our Lord Who gave the wonderful gift of the UA will not permit it to be eradicated from the life of the Church. <br /><br />Thank you, Cardinal Burke. Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20981956.post-27665314329513370632021-07-24T07:54:19.999-04:002021-07-24T07:54:19.999-04:00E.Michael Jones. Very Little Sympathy for Traditio...E.Michael Jones. Very Little Sympathy for Traditional Catholics<br /><br />https://catholiccritique.wordpress.com/2021/07/24/e-michael-jones-very-little-sympathy-for-traditional-catholics/ SHnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20981956.post-49009800981859006872021-07-24T06:43:05.640-04:002021-07-24T06:43:05.640-04:00What a dork! The cardinal is not in union with the...What a dork! The cardinal is not in union with the pope. He continues in the sin of the schism of fidelity to the antipope. Ergo his diatribe is tosh. Rather like the statement put out by the SSPX; three pages of avoiding the elephant in the room. Avoid these false shepherds. Unless you are in union with the true pope you are not a Catholic. You can only reclaim the Mass when you recognise the pope. Going to a Mass in union with an antipope is sinful. The Pope first, then the Mass.Paul Dalenoreply@blogger.com