tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20981956.post520674664432312389..comments2024-03-27T11:26:55.051-04:00Comments on Vox Cantoris: Rosica lectures: What really happened at the SynodUnknownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger5125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20981956.post-56086019949601373802014-12-10T07:47:19.597-05:002014-12-10T07:47:19.597-05:00Therese Z.
Be very careful about what you assume ...Therese Z.<br /><br />Be very careful about what you assume that I meant.<br /><br />That man came to Mass before he was a Catholic. He did not demand that the Church change to suit him. He dared not presume to receive the Holy Eucharist.<br /><br />You have forgotten what these malefactors in Rome attempted to do -- admit adulterists and practicers of sodomy to Holy Communion!<br /><br />I specifically referred to my own sinful past, perhaps you should go back and read it again.Vox Cantorishttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16987049370515084083noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20981956.post-39369484668456276722014-12-09T20:00:58.587-05:002014-12-09T20:00:58.587-05:00"How about finding a space in the Church for ... "How about finding a space in the Church for the gay activist before he repents and reforms?"<br /><br />This "space" smacks of "gradualism". Let me get this straight. While this gay activist "reassesses", he/she can continue, unabated, in the homosexual life style, without any moral censure, of this very lifestyle? Does this "space" involve reception of the Blessed Sacrament, a reception without any contrition, confession and satisfaction? How about this person putting a halt to the gay activism in order to make the reassessment a little more credible? <br /><br />Yes, we are all sinners. Should all sinners have a "space", approved by the Church, so they can continue in whatever sin, while they "reassess"? Or is homosexual activity a special type of sin that warrants a special "space" for its practitioners? Brianhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17077539500634876799noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20981956.post-55664937710272728342014-12-09T18:31:19.510-05:002014-12-09T18:31:19.510-05:00You seem to have skipped an example - you talk abo...You seem to have skipped an example - you talk about the former gay activist who was not rebuked for his former activities. How about finding a space in the Church for the gay activist before he repents and reforms? Greeting him with truth, yes, but joy and welcome, so he feels there is a place for him to safely reassess. <br /><br />Your take is pretty cold for the sinners out there, of which we all are.Therese Zhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03925404067634150968noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20981956.post-27132386373539909242014-12-09T15:15:00.234-05:002014-12-09T15:15:00.234-05:00pete salveinini
Unless a denomination has Apostol...pete salveinini<br /><br />Unless a denomination has Apostolic Succession, it is better to called them ecclesial communities. The Anglicans ecclesial communities across the globe DO NOT have Apostolicity, thus there is no supernatural grace to keep them faithful as a community to faith and morals. The exception among them is the Evangelical Anglican Church, which sought and obtained Apostolic Succession from the Old Catholic Church and the Jansenist lineAnonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05918293043169506773noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20981956.post-87459538161607444232014-12-09T13:43:27.105-05:002014-12-09T13:43:27.105-05:00"I feel that deep down something has to chang..."I feel that deep down something has to change here."<br /><br />Ah yes, "feelings", that Modernist lair into which so many, like Rosica, retreat when they promote their heterodox operating system. Sentimentality replaces faith.<br /><br /><br /><br />"There should be a real dialogue, and that dialogue, that exchange was present in the early church."<br /><br />There again, that word, "dialogue", another conciliar buzz -word This word, appeared, for the first time, in magisterial history at Vatican II, 28 times to be exact. It is a word, which, used in its conciliar sense, hides a wretchedly dishonest sham catholicism. This "dialogue" is endless, where the "anagke stenai" principle(it is necessary to stop somewhere) does not apply. Everything is "dialogue-able", even supernatural truths. "Dialogue" like "feelings" is used, by Neo-Modernists, to confuse, obfuscate and ultimately crumble any authentic Catholic understanding of the doctrine of faith and morals. <br /><br />When Rosica, a disciple of Gregory Baum, speaks...."Warning! Warning! Will Robinson." Brianhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17077539500634876799noreply@blogger.com