Secular Media is now picking up the latest Bergoglian heresy

The secular media is now picking up the story one below here wherein Juan Carlos, the prominent victim of the sodomite priest, Karadima, has said that as a "gay" man, according to "Pope" Francis, God made him that way.

It is hard to find a reason why Mr. Carlos would lie about this. It is consistent with what Bergoglio has said before. 

Mr. Carlos believes that he is a homosexual. Bergoglio has said that God created him this way.

Pope Francis, you are a filthy liar!

And every act of sodomy that Mr. Carlos commits will be on your soul on the day of your particular judgement.

Blasphemous Bergoglio affirms the pervert Karadima's victim in his homosexuality

"They had said to him almost that I was a pervert. I explained there that I'm not the reincarnation of San Luis Gonzaga, but am not a bad person, try not to harm anyone. He told me to "Juan Carlos, who you're gay it doesn't matter. God made you so loves so and I don't care. The Pope loves you so, you have to be happy with who you are"

There are two stories here. The situation that Juan Carlos, the victim of the filthy sodomite who abused him, seduced him and introduced him into homosexuality and the Bishop of Rome, the alleged Vicar of Christ who affirms the poor man in sin and error.

The first is of a man raped and abused, sodomized and betrayed who no doubt because of that has suffered immeasurably. His youth was stolen, his faith betrayed. A man who suffers from that day to this day, thinking that his life of homosexuality is normal. Let us pray for him, that he will heal from the evil done to him by filthy, vile evil men who deserve Hell.

God will forgive Juan more quickly than the filthy, lewd, man who is Pope which brings the second part of this story into focus. A man who betrayed all these abused in Chile and now puts forward a good show. He leaves this poor man in his sin telling him that "God made you gay." He lies to Juan Carlos and he blasphemes God.

God made nobody "gay" any more than he made anyone a murderer or a thief. 

Bergoglio is a scandal. Every time he opens his mouth it is as if to spout more blasphemy, more lies. He is a vile and despicable Pope, a man who has disgraced his Office. A boil on the seat of Peter that needs to be lanced.

O LORD, how long until you will deliver us and send us a holy pope who will restore all things in You?

https://infovaticana.com/2018/05/19/cruz-asegura-papa-le-dijo-dios-te-gay/amp/?__twitter_impression=true

http://eponymousflower.blogspot.ca/2018/05/in-interview-in-newspaper-el-pais-media.html?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed:+TheEponymousFlower+(The+Eponymous+Flower)

Francis Bergoglio should lead the pack

The Bishops of Chile have finished their meetings with the Bishop of Rome to discuss the crisis inflicted on children, mostly boys, in that country; a crisis caused by homosexuals -- sodomites, in the priesthood.

All of the bishops have resigned, whether the Bishop of Rome will accept all of these is not yet known.

Why should all resign; did not one have clean hands?

Why did Bergoglio wait so long to act, he was warned of the problem over two years ago that Juan Barros witnessed a notorious filthy pervert rape and sodomize a group of boys, repeatedly.

On a recent trip to Chile, Bergoglio slandered and rashly judged the victims for their cries to him for action. On the aeroplane home, he slandered them again making up lame excuses for his earlier gaff.

This is the same Bishop of Rome that invited Godfried Danneels to participate in a Synod on the Family, the same notorious protector of pervert priests and in particular, a pervert bishop who sodomites his own nephew.

The same Bishop of Rome who has propped up a certain Monsignor Ricca who was found in a Costa Rica elevator in a flagrant act of sexual perversion with a young Swiss Guard.

This arrogant boil on the seat of Peter, Jorge Bergoglio, should be the first one out the door.

Bergoglio the Heretic, Bergoglio the Schismatic

My regrets to disgrace the Lord's Day with such a headline, but how can we be silent in the face of such evil emanating from Rome? How can we sit by whilst the man charged by Our Lord Jesus Christ as the centre of unity, the one is to confirm his brethren in the faith is instead a divider, an egotistical monster, a diabolical narcissistic.

I hope those in the Vatican who read this blog print this out and say, "Look what these nasty bloggers are saying...we should try to sue this one again.!"

His handlers spin this man as some great friend of the faithful. No film can redeem this pathetic cretin, this malefactor!

We have just in the last few weeks the perversion visits to the Vatican of celebrities and globalists who by their actions hate Christ and His Church but are welcomed in its halls.

We have seen the scandalous use of sacred vestments by pagans and perverts aided and abetted by the likes of Timothy Dolan.

We have as Father Z reports, the sudden bolting down of tables in Roman sanctuaries, just since the Summorum Pontificum conference last autumn. 

https://onepeterfive.com/german-bishop-pope-francis-has-effectively-approved-of-the-intercommunion-handout/

http://wdtprs.com/blog/2018/05/sad-cranmer-tables-in-the-pantheon-and-many-great-roman-churche/

http://magister.blogautore.espresso.repubblica.it/2018/05/02/one-cardinal-seven-bishops-and-four-new-dubia-this-time-on-intercommunion/

More filthy insults by the Bergoglian boil on the seat of Peter (think of another name for a donkey)

And the vilest man who once told a woman who follows Martin Luther to "go forward" to receive Holy Communion, to expand it to all of Germany and eventually the world. Just as with Amoris Laetitia, this is the ultimate attack on Jesus Christ and His Holy Sacrament, His body, blood, soul and divinity.

Bergoglio is an evil man, there can now be no doubt, more and more daily come to see him for what he is.

The Cardinals and Bishops who are waiting for him to drop dead and start again are wrong. They are cowards and they must cease to be so. They must stand up and call out this heretical, malefactor for what he is. They cannot remove him, but they can denounce him.

So it is written, so let it be done!

Bergoglio insults faithful Catholic youths - calls them rigid and hyopcrites

Here we have more insults from the Bishop of Rome; these directed to rigid youths. It is quite the lead up to the Synod. 

Indeed, let us insult those young men and women who try their best with the grace of God to overcome the culture of death, pornography, sexuality and perversion to lead a good, clean and holy life. 

Never in history has there been a Bishop of Rome who has been so insulting to so many for so long.

The most ignorant, boorish, pathetic man to ever occupy the Chair of Peter.

The man is a sociopath, an abusive father - never has a man unfit for the office for which he holds.

No mercy for these smelly sheep.

Michael Matt and Glenn Beck discuss Jorge Bergoglio

The New York Times, a.k.a. "Hell's Bible" reveals to us the betrayal by Gänswein, Marini

If it were already not enough of a scandal that Timothy Dolan participated in the abomination, sacrilege and blasphemy which took place in New York City now the New York Times reveals the backstory.

Gänswein (who has previously welcomed "gay" couples to the Vatican and ushered them in to see the Bishop of Rome) and Marini, Papa Ratzinger's Secretary and Master of Ceremonies were both involved and responsible.

They are traitors, puffed up in finery. They are filthy frauds.

This is how bad it is friends; that even those whom we thought were the good guys turn out to be just as rotten and filthy effing scum as the rest.

They betrayed Papa Ratzinger and they betrayed us.

I find it impossible to pray for their conversion. I leave their judgement to God.

By Jason Horowitz

May 3, 2018

VATICAN CITY — Archbishop Georg Gänswein said yes to the dress.

The dashing former right-hand man to Benedict XVI, the fashion-plate pope, he is now prefect of the papal household under the more austere Pope Francis. In May 2017, Archbishop Gänswein sat in his stately Apostolic Palace office as Andrew Bolton, curator in charge of the Costume Institute at the Metropolitan Museum of Art, showed him a look book of couture masterpieces that Mr. Bolton felt matched with certain Vatican treasures.

Archbishop Gänswein, in a soutane with purple sash, indifferently flipped pages of designer frocks until he lingered on a luxurious Madame Grès dress inspired by a Franciscan habit.  

“They all love that,” Mr. Bolton said of the dress.

The archbishop gradually became enthusiastic as he and Mr. Bolton discussed the role of beauty in the church and Mr. Bolton explained his vision for the project that would explore the way the Catholic church had served as an inspiration to designers through the centuries. Then things really started rolling.

Mr. Bolton received authorization from senior Vatican officials to borrow the vestments. He was also granted full access to the Sistine Chapel Sacristy and became so close with its custodian priests in his 10 trips to Rome that they entrusted him with the hidden chamber’s keys and opened secret doors, behind which elderly nuns ironed the pope’s white vestments. 

Gänswein, Papa Ratzinger's Prison Warden

The show that would ultimately become “Heavenly Bodies: Fashion and the Catholic Imagination,” the biggest exhibit the Costume Institute of the Metropolitan Museum has ever held, opening May 10, was on the verge of becoming a reality.

It was the culmination of years of negotiations, two stalled visits to Rome, and walking the tightrope between Anna Wintour, the powerful editor of Vogue and a Met trustee, and the many powers in the Vatican.

While the Vatican may be enthusiastic about “Heavenly Bodies” now, it took years for it to warm to an exhibit that Mr. Bolton first envisioned as including many religious traditions. Dealing with one church proved to be enough.

In June 2016, a colleague of Mr. Bolton’s in the Met’s European paintings department put him in touch with Arnold Nesselrath, a Vatican museum curator. Mr. Nesselrath arranged for Mr. Bolton to visit the Sistine Chapel Sacristy, a chamber of rooms within rooms containing a hive of numbered wooden doors and drawers bearing embossed strips and containing shawls and stoles, papal tiaras, papal rings and pectoral crosses. 

Mr. Bolton tried to explain the concept of the exhibition to the keeper of the sacristy, a quiet Slovakian priest named Pavel Benedik.

“He wasn’t quite sure what the request was,” Mr. Bolton said of Father Benedik. “He was confused.”

Monsignor Marini the Fraud, with Bergoglio 

To expedite the process, Mr. Nesselrath suggested that on his next visit, Mr. Bolton meet with Barbara Jatta, now the director of the Vatican museum. For that trip, Mr. Bolton brought along Ms. Wintour. Ms. Jatta arranged several tours for them, including another trip to the Sacristy, where this time Father Benedik’s assistant, Antonio, showed them around.

Ms. Jatta asked how many items the Met intended to borrow, and Mr. Bolton responded: about eight. Ms. Wintour said he needed to ask for at least twice that, prompting a skeptical laugh from Ms. Jatta. (The Met eventually got more than 40.) Ms. Jatta then informed the curator that the lending of the pieces was, anyway, out of her hands.

“These vestments don’t belong to the Vatican Museum,” she said, according to Mr. Bolton. “They belong to the Sistine Chapel Sacristy.”

Ms. Wintour was less than pleased. 

“She turned around to me and said, ‘This isn’t your finest moment, Andrew,’” Mr. Bolton recalled.

So he came back. Again and again. 

“He was quite the dandy,” Mr. Bolton said.

And Father Benedik warmed to him. Nevertheless, the priest lacked the power to authorize a loan and suggested that Mr. Bolton talk to Archbishop Gänswein.

“He’s like a movie star, it’s like meeting George Clooney,” Mr. Bolton said of the archbishop, often called “Gorgeous George.” Archbishop Gänswein, apparently on board, told Mr. Bolton to send an official request to Msgr. Guido Marini, the papal master of liturgical celebrations and the keeper of the sacristy.

The Met’s head of exhibitions, Quincy Houghton, did just that, and Monsignor Marini’s office asked for approval — a “nihil obstat” in Vatican parlance — from the first section of the Secretariat of State, which is responsible for general church affairs. 

“This is not a procedure where the pope gets involved, or has to give his O.K.,” said the Vatican spokesman Greg Burke.

When permission was granted, Mr. Bolton returned for many more trips and, with Father Benedik, refined the list of objects to borrow, including a papal tiara with 19,000 precious stones, including 18,000 diamonds. (It will fly to New York with its own bodyguard.) During one 10-day stretch of 12-hour days inside the Sacristy with Katarina Jebb, who scanned the objects for the catalog, the custodians entrusted Mr. Bolton with the keys to the Sacristy.  

With the loans secured, Mr. Bolton asked David Tracy, a highly regarded Catholic writer — Mr. Bolton called him “the J.D. Salinger of the theological world” — to contribute an essay to the catalog to lend it intellectual heft.

It took a year before he agreed. Then Mr. Bolton tackled the New York side of the equation, trying to ensure he wasn’t accidentally touching any third rails.

He asked Emily Rafferty, a former president of the Met with connections to New York’s Catholic community, for a hand. She suggested Mr. Bolton work with James Martin, a Jesuit priest and editor at large for America Magazine, who was appointed last year by Pope Francis as a consultor to the Vatican’s Secretariat for Communications.

Father Martin said that one day, after embarrassingly spilling hummus on his pants earlier, he went to a Met conference room to review the storyboards the curators had pinned to the walls with thumbtacks. He was impressed by what he described as the “real attention to Catholic sensibilities” behind the pairings.

Asked by Mr. Bolton and colleagues if he thought the presentation would prompt any blowback, Father Martin said there may be some complaints about “celebrity culture being grafted onto the church,” but that he thought it would be minor. “They will see something beautiful, and that’s part of the Catholic imagination,” he said.

It was also Father Martin who, reviewing the gift catalog, noticed that one necklace was described as adorned with a “winged man,” and told the Met: “It’s O.K. to say ‘angel.’”

He also suggested asking Cardinal Gianfranco Ravasi, the de facto minister of culture for the Vatican and an erudite former prefect of the Biblioteca-Pinacoteca Ambrosiana in Milan, to contribute to the exhibit catalog. Cardinal Ravasi had gotten to know many of the great designers during his time in the fashion capital, including Miuccia Prada, Domenico Dolce and Stefano Gabbana, and Giorgio Armani.

In February, the Met delegation, including Mr. Bolton and Ms. Wintour, traveled to Rome to officially announce the exhibit alongside Cardinal Ravasi, who not only participated in the news conference, but also rubbed shoulders with Donatella Versace. She told him she thought his crimson vestments were beautiful.

He said he replied: “The purple is even better.”

Still, in a church where Pope Francis’s dressing down has made dressing up out of style,  questions remain about how a lush exhibit and its related gala, organized by Ms. Wintour, squares with the pope’s desire for a less ostentatious, poorer church.

“Francis with his simple clothes expresses another concept. It’s not combative with the others,” said Cardinal Ravasi, who said he considered fashion a critical cultural language and the lent vestments expressions of the church’s power, beauty and splendor through the centuries.

The cardinal said fashion had biblical origins (“It was God who dressed us. God was the tailor in Genesis”) and that he saw a common thread between the dress code for a gala and the otherworldliness of ecclesiastical vestments. Both of them signified, he said, a distinction from the mundane and quotidian.

As for those who consider the accessorizing of papal vestments with modern fashion a blasphemous exploitation, Cardinal Ravasi said it at least shows those Christian symbols still touch a nerve.

“They aren’t using the symbols of the Roman Empire,” he said with a chuckle.

The filthy perversion of James Martin's priesthood.

Dolan's Disgrace ... again!

https://torontocatholicwitness.blogspot.ca/2018/05/met-gala-heavenly-bodies-open-attack-on.html

Bergoglian confidant Jozef De Kesel a heretic, a malefactor, and no doubt, a sodomite himself

How can one not seethe with anger to the point of cursing this Cardinal as a son of a whore? The Italians say it well, "Figlio di puttana!"

O LORD in heaven, send forth Thy anger and rage and destroy these evil men who have betrayed your Church and your people.

Convert them, or damn them to Hell!

Cardinal Jozef De Kesel backs prayer ceremony for gay couples

Belgian Archbishop of Malines-Brussels says he is open to reflecting on a 'prayer ceremony' to seal such relationships

Claire Lesegretain
Belgium

May 7, 2018

• 
• 
• 
• 

Cardinal Jozef De Kesel, archbishop of Malines-Brussels and primate of the Catholic Church in Belgium, is open to reflecting on a 'pray celebration' for gay couples. (M.Migliorato/CPP/CIRIC/Catholic Press Photo)

Cardinal Jozef De Kesel of Malines-Brussels last week met with a small delegation from a local gay working group which had requested an audience.

Following the meeting, Cardinal De Kesel “expressed his concern for their well-being and conveyed his respect to them,” Geert De Kerpel, the Dutch-speaking spokesperson for the Archdiocese of Malines-Brussels said on May 5.

In his effort to answer questions from the working group, “the cardinal also spoke of their relationships as couples, distinguishing these from Christian marriage between a man and a woman,” De Kerpel said.

“However, it does involve a personal encounter,” he said.

Cardinal De Kesel expressed his desire to answer the requests of believing gay couples who are involved in a stable and lasting relationship and who wish to benefit from a symbolic recognition by the church.

However, this could not be a “religious marriage” nor an “ecclesiastical blessing that too closely resembles the blessing of a marriage,” De Kerpel said.

“If gay people still desire a Christian symbol of their proximity, the cardinal is thinking more of a celebration of thanksgiving or prayer.

“However, this would certainly not involve an exchange of consent sealed by an exchange of rings,” De Kerpel said.

“To the extent that the church has maintained a certain reserve on the issue, it is to preserve the great value of marriage and the family to the greatest extent possible,” he said.

On May 5, Belgian media broadcast the statement widely, emphasizing that Cardinal De Kesel was adopting a “revolutionary position.”

But in reality he had simply confirmed the position the Belgian Church had already taken on the issue.

Cardinal De Kesel, 71, has been Archbishop of Malines-Brussels since 2015 and is well known for his open-mindedness on various issues.

In his first homily as archbishop he announced that he would work for a church that was “more open and more attentive to the poor, to the most vulnerable.”

The time for politeness and deference to Bergoglio is long over

The Bishop of Rome, Bergoglio, has sent the word back to the German bishops to go back to Germany and find a unanimous resolution to the problem they created wherein most desire to give Holy Communion to Protestants and the few remaining Catholic bishops, do not.

The Pope is to be the foundation of unity. Instead, Jorge Bergoglio is a foundation of chaos and disunity. What we are seeing being played out is his heretical, satanic "synodal church." A church which is not Catholic. 

We have seen this all before. It is a model we have seen with the Anglican "church." It is an echo of heresiarch Kasper's statement during the Synod on the Family of the African bishops adherence to tradition and that they should not tell the enlightened Germans "too much what to do," a racist statement if ever there were one. Adolf Hitler's racial supremacy lives on in Walter Kasper.

This is one more attack on the Holy and Blessed Sacrament from the same man who refuses to kneel to Him at the altar.

This action on the part of the Germans is schismatic. The action of the Bishop of Rome, in this case, is not Catholic, it is heretical and it is in itself, promoting schism.

We sit by whilst our bishops and cardinals do nothing. Faithful Catholics are horrified more each day with the goings on in Rome. 

Everyone is too polite.

It is time to call out Jorge Bergoglio, the man who is legally Pope as a heretic, an enemy of the Faith, an enemy of the Catholic people and an enemy of Christ.

New hell coming from Germany once again

More hell coming from Germany. 

Something evil is embedded deeply in that nation. It began with the evil heretic Martin Luther. It continued on through the state and culture with the founders of Illuminism, Communism and National Socialism. It manifested in the Catholic Church through nihilistic and modernist philosophies and the infiltration by heretical ideas, including those of Joseph Ratzinger, at the Second Vatican Council. The evil within the German mind and soul has now manifested fully within the heretical German episcopal hierarchy, rich with money and filled with error. From Heresiarch Kasper to Heresiarch Marx, few episcopal leaders have a Catholic heart.

In our Pope Bergoglio, these wretched German prelates have found a voice who wreaks with heresy and Lutheranism from Evangelii Gaudium to Amoris Laetitia and the most recent. 

Remember who it was that told that woman in a Lutheran church in Rome to "go forward."

Bergoglio and his German master must be exposed and rebuked.

Please read this at Sandro Magister's blog.

http://magister.blogautore.espresso.repubblica.it/2018/05/02/one-cardinal-seven-bishops-and-four-new-dubia-this-time-on-intercommunion/

Dear England

Dear England,

What a week you've had. At the same time as your new Royal baby was born, you invoked a fascist ideology to deny the rights of the parent of another to keep theirs alive. Little Alfie Evans is dead, yet, he lives this very day. As a baptized child, long before the age of reason, he was dead in this life and alive in the Lord a moment later. A friend on Facebook wrote a post yesterday with the picture of Terri Shiavo. You remember her, right? She is the woman who was the canary in the coal mine in the United States over a decade ago put to death by a corrupt judge and medical system which has gone awry. She wrote:

Welcome to the Kingdom, Alfie. Charlie’s over there with your nanny. Her name’s Terry. She knows you better than you think. And she’ll keep you warm and happy till Mum and Dad get here. Come in and meet Abba, Father — and He shall wipe away every tear, and Death shall have no dominion.

Think not that this writer hates England or the English people. As a Canadian, that would be impossible. But what England has become in the last half-century reveals the fraud which it had become for over 500 years.

In my fantasies about living in another time, that time would be in medieval England, hardly the Dark Ages. A time when the whole land was Catholic. When the King was Catholic. A time when the monasteries developed a social and economic system that was inherently Catholic. When people's lives were governed by Embers and Rogations and Feasts of Saints. A time and a land where Jesus Christ ruled people's lives because they loved Him and Mary, His mother, was always their queen.

All of this changed when their own wretched "Pol Pot" or Henry VIII, as one commenter put it came on the scene. I would argue it was a generation earlier when his father murdered the last Plantagenet, Richard III, the last truly Catholic King of England. The Tudor's were a satanic force. A pathetic, immoral blood-thirsty family of usurpers. Henry VII, Henry VIII and his bastards, Edward VI and Elizabeth I. The real and rightful heir, Mary, was tainted in history as "bloody" for protecting her rule and attempting a restoration. How just that a filthy brutish devil who would worry so much about his dynasty should have that dynasty end only a generation later. A murderous regime that tortured and executed thousands of its own people who only wished to follow the faith of their fathers. Thomas More, and John Fisher. Margaret Clitherow, Edmund Campion and Robert Southwell and Anne Line. Priest and Bishops, Augustinians, Franciscans and Jesuits when they actually had faith. Laymen and women including Earl's Lady's Knights and commoners. 

Bl. Margaret Pole

A reader has reminded me of Margaret Pole, the last Catholic noblewoman who was murdered by Henry VIII whom I have blogged about previously.

http://voxcantor.blogspot.ca/2010/05/blessed-margaret-plantagenet-pole.html

If this were to happen today, the modern world would consider it a religious genocide. England was no better than the Iran of today or the maniacal monsters of ISIS, or the fascist regime of Saudi Arabia. This was their own Reign of Terror,  The French got it from somewhere. England's leaders are no better than Assad or Hussein.

After that, England became worse. It profited from the misery of others as it enslaved Africans and sold them as chattel. It beggared nations as it raped their resources. The sun never set on its empire, yet it was an empire of evil and pillage. It could have been an empire of grace. The whole course of world history changed that day when Richard III was murdered. England would have remained Catholic, the protestant revolution would have no doubt been isolated to central Europe, it would not have been taken around the world as it was by England. North America would be fully Catholic, much of Oceana as well. There would have been no pilgrims to Plymouth Rock. There would have been Catholic immigrants. 

The "Church" of England is a fraud. No bishop is real. No priest is real. The bread is bread. It is a corrupt mockery of the real Church. Anglicanism is a putrid abomination dressed up with pretty music and regal ceremony. 

England went on to pass over more than 50 Catholics to find a heretic apostate to sit on its throne. They would take a German heretic rather than a Catholic Englishman. It engaged in a family feud that butchered millions in the mud of Europe and then extracted such penalties from the German perpetrators that it should have been obvious that a greater war of evil would come from it.

The Windsors are a Germanic family of frauds. Their hold on the Throne of England is as illegitimate as Henry's bastards and as false as the Anglican "Church." The both deserve each other. The English people have been duped to think that their church is the Church and their queen is their Queen.

England has become a fascist socialist swamp. A pathetic shadow of its once great potential. It's Queen, who purports to love Jesus as in her last Christmas message must see her death coming soon. She is close to it, no doubt. Yet, she signed into law the murderous abortion bill that has murdered 7,000,000 of her children. She sat by and did not even use moral suasion to prevent the deaths of Charlie Gard and Alfie Evans. Its people have generally become cowards and selfish. 

Charlie and Alfie may have died, regardless. In fact, the doctors may have been correct about their diagnosis and the prognosis.

The issue then and now is the right of the parents to determine the care, to seek other opinions and other options. 

England is now cursed. It cursed itself more than a half-millennium ago and it is being punished for its actions. In its zeal of hatred for Christ, it has embraced within it the tool which will destroy it, Islam.

To my English readers, God bless you and may Mary keep you. Find your courage, your soul, fight and reclaim your land for Christ, for Mary.

England is dying, it is almost dead, but it can be saved and it is a lesson for the rest of us in Canada, the United States, Australia and elsewhere.

Old Happy Hands Hodgson has cost the Basilians, Bazillians

The very idea that the famous Basilian spokesman would say that the "Basilian Fathers have not yet decided on an appeal" is repugnant and a disgrace. The answer should have been, "the Basilian Fathers WILL NOT undertake an appeal!"

No homosexual must ever be admitted to the priesthood.

Period.

Any in the priesthood should be removed and laicised.

Every. Single. One.

https://www.theglobeandmail.com/canada/article-ontario-jury-sets-record-punitive-award-against-catholic-church-over/

https://www.theinquiry.ca/wordpress/accused/charged/marshall-father-william-hodgson-marshall/

http://lfpress.com/news/local-news/roman-catholic-church-to-pay-2-6m-in-landmark-sex-abuse-case

Complaints were made about this filthy sodomite as far back as 1947. Multiple times. Yet the Basilian masters shuffled Happy Hands off elsewhere to do it all again.

They were not only sexual perverts, they were sadists as Barona writes

However, I did witness one incident of physical abuse. I saw Fr. Cecil Zinger, wrapping a tie around a boy's neck so tightly,chastising him that he had his tie off.  The result of Zinger's actions was the young man developed a nose bleed. With blood pouring out of the young man's nose, Zinger immediately changed tactics, and took the boy into his classroom. I had a class of my own, and moved on. Sadly, since Zinger remained at the school, the priest was not charged with assault. Zinger is now dead: and lauded by the Basilians. May readers reflect on his assault on this young man, and draw their own conclusions.

I have my own story of these brutes and one day I shall tell it and name, names.

Hundreds, thousands of lives ruined.

Millions upon millions of dollars in reparation.

Basilians.

Alfie Evans and the damnation of England

Pour out O Lord your anger upon them; let your burning fury overtake them. … Charge them with guilt upon guilt; let them have no share in your justice (Ps 69:25, 28).

Shame and terror be theirs forever. Let them be disgraced; let them perish (Ps 83:18).

To those who may be offended or call me a sinner for my "judgmental" commentary, please note the following.

Clearly you have never read the maledictory or what are also referred to as the imprecatory psalms, those psalms which invoke judgement, calamity or curses upon one's enemies or the enemies of God. 

You clearly suffer from the corruption of the Second Vatican Council and the "Liturgy of the Hours" and Responsorial psalms of the Novus Ordo Missae which has either stripped the psalms completely or edited them to be benign. 

Your soon to be "saint" Giovanni Montini, or Paul VI made this quite clear. Open the introduction to you Liturgy of the Hours and read his views on these, particularly how being translated to the vernacular and how they would hurt our modern sensibilities. What a puff.

From Father Z:

Can we – ought we – pray that God strike down the enemies of the Church? Holy Scripture is full of prayers offered for the defeat of the enemies of God. The unfashionable “maledictory – cursing – psalms” (5, 6, 11, 12, 35, 37, 40 52, 54, 56, 58, 69, 79, 83, 137, 139, and 143) call for judgment and disaster to fall upon the enemies of God and God’s people.  Many of these psalms were “edited” or even wholly excluded from the revised psalter used in the Liturgy of the Hours, but that’s a different crock of bagna cauda.

From Msgr. Charles Pope:

Prior to the publication of the Liturgy of the Hours, Pope Paul VI decreed that the imprecatory psalms be omitted. As a result, approximately 120 verses (three entire psalms (58[57], 83[82], and 109[108]) and additional verses from 19 others) were removed. The introduction to the Liturgy of the Hours cites the reason for their removal as a certain “psychological difficulty” caused by these passages. This is despite the fact that some of these psalms of imprecation are used as prayer in the New Testament (e.g., Rev 6:10) and in no sense to encourage the use of curses (General Instruction # 131). Six of the Old Testament Canticles and one of the New Testament Canticles contain verses that were eliminated for the same reason.

If anyone had "psychological difficulty" it was Giovanni Montini!

Alfie Evans lives. For how long, only the good Lord knows. 

Make no mistake, the hospital and National Health System is hiding something. Worse, they fear that if Alfie does not die, and die soon, they will be discovered for the corrupt frauds that they are.

You will not be surprised that the judge that sentenced Alfie to death is not only a sodomite but a Freemason.

The situation with Alfie and Charlie Gard before him is more than tragic or sad, it is evil. The world is watching England betray its people, its history, its culture. At one time, England was the bastion of liberty and justice; now it is become a land of fascists and satanists. 

Fundamentally, the problem that Alfie finds himself in and Charlie before him, is that their country betrayed its Catholic identity a half millennium ago. World history changed when Henry VII murdered Richard III and it changed again, for the worse, under his son Henry and his evil bastard son Edward and his whore bastard daughter, Elizabeth. These evil monarchs who stole the throne from not only Richard III but the just Queen, Mary, daughter of Catherine of Aragon, set England on its current path. The murderous whore Elizabeth I buried the last vestiges of England's ancient faith. 

Elizabeth II, my Queen, will burn in Hell under a just God for what she has done to Alfie and Charlie. Rather than save these children and save her nation, she has chosen her lot. 

Charlie Gard, murdered by Her Majesty's Hospital

Shame on Elizabeth Regina.

Shame on the Royal Family. 

They celebrate the birth of another heir and stand by whilst a corrupt system murders another. England's monarchs have never repented for their betrayal of Christ, Our Lady and the English people. Until they do, England will continue on its downward slide into barbarity, dictatorship and perversion. 

Islam and its future sharia is a curse set upon England for its deserved crimes. 

How are we to understand that in a free and democratic nation, the parents are barred from removing their child to home to die, if that be what comes, or to take him abroad at no cost to England? How are we to understand that this little family are treated as wretched criminals.

Damn England!

God dam the Royal Family, a corrupt, heretical mob of sons of bitches and whores and bastards if there ever any and it begins with Elizabeth Regina, a cowardly pretender.

Damn my Queen!

Where is our Magna Carta?

There is a stench from England. From the rotten Queen to the rotten, silent Prime Minister and Home Secretary. To the filthy bastards at the hospital and in the constabulary. What is worse is the obvious display of cowardice on the part of the men of England. Feminised, sissy Englishmen. Shame on you that you stand by whilst your corrupt fascist government murders this baby.

They will all go to Hell.

When Charlie dies, as a baptised Catholic child, his pure soul will be instantly with God. He will be a Saint. The others, will rot in the pit of Hell.

An email from a friend.

As I sit watching the sickening situation in Liverpool develop, I’ve been praying for Alfie’s father specifically. Can anyone really be surprised that the culture of death has evolved this far? To me it is a natural progression that reflects a complete and total abandonment of not just a Catholic anthropological sense, not just a Christian one, but a wholesale abandonment of the very idea that humans are more than animals that can be dispatched at will. I’m thinking of a story I read a long time ago about Dagger John Hughes of New York. Maybe it’s apocryphal, but it serves to make a good point. As I remember it, when protestant mobs threatened to burn churches in NY, Dagger John called the men to arms to defend their faith and their church. Thousands of Irishmen surrounded old St. Pats and other parish churches, but when the prottie mob saw the men standing their ground and willing to defend their churches with their lives, they stopped the attack. What prompted all of this was a fight over the right of Catholic parents to have schools where their children were taught the faith. The God-given natural law right of parents to determine what is best for their children. These men, rallying around their bishop, were willing to die “merely” in defense of their ability to pass on the faith – they weren’t fighting for their lives, but to protect church buildings. Now in the 21st century we have parents whose right not only to decide what is best for their child, but their right to keep their child safe from harm, to give their child FOOD is being taken away. Where are the Catholic men? More importantly, where are the bishops to lead them? The few Catholics who have the courage to make a charge from the trenches will be mowed down while their generals fiddle as the family burns. What will be left of the Catholic family after the pew-sitters realize – even subconsciously – that their fathers in Christ just don’t care enough to risk their own comfort? That the vicar of Christ will prostitute the father of a child about to be murdered for a photo op, and the CBCEW equivocates and actually PRAISES the hospital doing this is just demonic. Absolutely demonic. Whomever participating in the writing of that statement must HATE Christ. This is not just about Alfie. They want priests? Where the hell do they think they will come from? They want a laity who is willing to give sacrificially to support the church? Where the hell do they think they will come from? If there are no Catholic families there will very quickly be no Catholic institution. The silence of the bishops, the lack of a call to defend the fundamental unit of our faith and our Church – from Rome on down  - is an act of ecclesiastical suicide just as much as sitting in a car with the garage door closed and the engine running. It will be a slow death and a quiet one as parishes are merged and then closed, but it will still be, inevitably,  death. I’m not a father of any stripe, and will never be, but if it were my child laying there waiting for the doctor to come down the hall with a lethal injection I’d be totally justified in sitting there with a gun and shooting anyone who came into the room to try to kill my son. I’d end up being killed by the police, but if this isn’t a case of “Greater love hath no man that to lay down his life” then I don’t know what is. Sorry for the rambling and probably faltering rant, but this has been floating around in my head since yesterday evening. I have no pulpit, no blog and no voice but I have to get this out of my head – maybe having written it down it will stop my mind racing.

No peace, no truce

Let us pick up here on a thought by Mundabor. In his post, No Rest for the Wicked, he writes; "Some FrancisShills have started to promote some sort of “truce” concerning the way this disgraceful Pontiff is treated by bloggers."

I've seen these calls as well. No. not at all, no truce, no peace, no letting up on exposing the corruption of Jorge Bergoglio. There will be no relaxation on the reporting of the manipulation of his election, which may ultimately be invalidated and he declared an Antipope. No retreat on exposing his evil ideology of globalism, communism and Masonic fraternalism. No retreat against rationalist attack on the supernatural faith. There will be no silence while Bergoglio and his filthy minions continue to attack Catholic doctrine at the same time denying it. 

Can the Pope change doctrine? asked Richard Gaillardetz in National Catholic Reporter and quoted often by many priests, including Thomas Rosica. "No, doctrine changes when pastoral contexts shift and new insights emerge." They don't quote this any longer because they were caught. Instead, these Bergoglians have just gone about doing it. 

In the video interview below and in the book, The Dictator Pope, Dr. Henry Sire reveals that the reforms sought by the ignorant Cardinals, ignorant of the Peronist boil they were putting on the Seat of Peter, have been trashed. Instead, what has emerged is a political, megalomaniacal tyrant, not a Shepherd but a hireling and an evil heresiarch.

Harsh words directed by a lay Catholic to the Vicar of Christ. Yes indeed. harsh words. Francis is the Pope, the Law states it, the priests of the Diocese of Rome verify its fact. The Catholic faithful have accepted it. He is Pope. 

Reality can be very harsh and what some of us have known since March 2013 is now becoming known by many more. That an evil presence has arisen against Holy Mother Church. The Holy Faith is under attack. History, however, can be very harsh and the judgement of future Pope or Council is going to be made upon this period, upon this pompous Peronist, upon bishops such as Coleridge, Cupich, Maradiaga, Danneels and minions such as Faggioli, Spadaro and dozens of others. They will be "judged and found wanting" and they and all their filthy work will be declared anathema.

May the good Lord show mercy upon us and deliver us from these malefactors.