tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20981956.post6178987678174579191..comments2024-03-27T11:26:55.051-04:00Comments on Vox Cantoris: EWTN's National Catholic Regsiter permits libel and defamation against Pope Francis and Vox Cantoris in its combox - violates its own comment posting policyUnknownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger32125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20981956.post-12818480576707409232015-03-13T05:46:12.778-04:002015-03-13T05:46:12.778-04:00Dear Mr. Arroyo,
On behalf of Frankie and I thank...Dear Mr. Arroyo,<br /><br />On behalf of Frankie and I thank you for your kindness. <br /><br />We appreciate our work and your humour and watch you all the time.<br />God bless.<br /><br />Vox CantorisVox Cantorishttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16987049370515084083noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20981956.post-73037860506552538802015-03-12T23:18:11.925-04:002015-03-12T23:18:11.925-04:00Dear Mr. Domet,
On behalf of EWTN I will step for...Dear Mr. Domet,<br /><br />On behalf of EWTN I will step forward and apologize. <br /><br />I'm so sorry. <br /><br />RaymondAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20981956.post-16822065900649706142015-03-12T19:44:07.162-04:002015-03-12T19:44:07.162-04:00My point was that someone was acting censoriously ...My point was that someone was acting censoriously regarding the most controversial interview ever granted by Fr. Rosica. That is the point. <br />Baronahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06265555388172261643noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20981956.post-62267063027475404082015-03-12T19:40:17.591-04:002015-03-12T19:40:17.591-04:00Vox, Please Explain, I don't understand why &q...Vox, Please Explain, I don't understand why "anonymous" people need to be defended in the comments box?Foxnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20981956.post-9838000454168749672015-03-12T19:09:04.833-04:002015-03-12T19:09:04.833-04:00"Derrick", Barona's point about Wikk..."Derrick", Barona's point about Wikkipedia was exactly that anyone can post information on and DELETE information from it...Foxnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20981956.post-22341402230501233332015-03-12T19:03:33.608-04:002015-03-12T19:03:33.608-04:00Isn't it odd that Wendy and Linda looked up th...Isn't it odd that Wendy and Linda looked up that very blog post this morning on another blog? You see, a friend called and said "Is this I.P. address Wendy's?" I looked it up from my records and those sent to me by other bloggers and said, "It certainly is?"<br /><br />Funny that she was looking at the page on the concert and then you were too.<br /><br />Isn't the Internet wonderful? It leaves little crumbs of bread just like the gossip that you two boys and your mother have sown.<br /><br />You see boys, you can't fool me or anyone and the people that read your histrionics can make their own decisions.<br /><br /> Vox Cantorishttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16987049370515084083noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20981956.post-16262081247991743912015-03-12T18:57:31.153-04:002015-03-12T18:57:31.153-04:00Ah, so nice to see the trolls like Derrick, an alt...Ah, so nice to see the trolls like Derrick, an alter ego of Wade and spawn of Wendy and Linda List. Welcome brother.<br /><br />Regrding your comment about the concert at St. Michael’s Cathedral; you are assuming that the Archbishop new and approved of the desecration of St. Michael’s Cathedral by that secular cabaret concert. I never said he knew you clearly insinuate that he did. However, I certainly know more than the Rector or the staff person who permitted that blasphemy of sacred space to go on. If you can’t see something wrong with that, then it says more about you then you can even imagine.<br /><br />Now get out of my living room and find some courage to step out into the light. <br />Vox Cantorishttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16987049370515084083noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20981956.post-84118396453635601212015-03-12T18:29:19.942-04:002015-03-12T18:29:19.942-04:00Mr. David Domet,
Wad never calumniated you and ne...Mr. David Domet,<br /><br />Wad never calumniated you and never accused your son as a bastard. He just asked questions relating to annulments. He never accused you of anything yet you threaten and accuse him of lies and accused him of calling you son a bastard. He didn't. <br />You seem to take everything personally. You said the pope should send that Fr. Rosika packing, and other things. I saw the law firms letter and the words you used about Father Rosika.<br /><br /> <br />Barona, you look at Wikipedia as the authoratitive source. Anyone can add or subtract things from there. Gregory Baum might say strange things. But until he has life in him, he has hope and time to see the truth. Moreover, we don't know his life and his past, which shapes people. You all have no charity. Do not try to defend the Pope either now. You've got comments about how the pope should be catholic and he doesnt follow the law. Law, Law, Rules, Rules for other people but not yourselves. You Mr Domet called the commenter a liar among other things. S&L interviewed sspx leader and others including Gregory Baum as well. I say So what??? Gregory Baum is a child of God and so are all you. The church is big. Not everyone will agree with you and people are at different stages in spiritual life.<br /><br />You only see what you want. The reason why you must be upset is because it might hit a chord in you. You accused the commenter here just because he adked questions you don't like. He didn't accuse you. I read your article on a fundraising concert at the cathedral, and how you seem to know more than the archbishop of Toronto. <br /><br />It seems all of you are friends on the traditional blog sites. you filter what you don't like. The web is free to report anything and Im sure that there's truth to what these posters commented. Look at how you all are. You are like hypocrites, or jackals and you have a vicious streak in you all. I used to wonder why the church went in such a direction as it is now. Maybe because it was run by people like you. You tell others not to judge and you are in no position but you do it all the time. You asked that other blogger to remove something and they did and now you are posting your victory blog report on it, and then threatening anyone to go and sue you?<br /><br /><br />You cast judgements on everyone. The commenter here never said anything of you but you said he calumniated and lied. Don't lie Mr. Domet. Don't cover up. It means nothing what your response is. If you believe in the God you profess, then you need to look inward. Seriously look inward and stop attacking everyone around you. STOP IT! It's not good for your health. You seem to have so much rage in you.<br /><br />I wish you all a very happy lent and Easter. I'm sure you have a wonderful family Mr. Domet and may God bless you, your new wife, your son and other children.<br /><br />Pray the good Lord opens your eyes and mine and be more patient and understanding and loving.<br /><br />Derrick Derricknoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20981956.post-67526144908814845922015-03-11T18:28:32.966-04:002015-03-11T18:28:32.966-04:00There are a number of issues being posted here tha...There are a number of issues being posted here that need fleshing out.<br /><br />Wade: you write of censorship. I suggest you explore Fr.Rosica's wikipedia entry. You will notice that there is no reference to his interview with Gregory Baum. Strange, given that it may well be Fr. Rosica's most controversial interview ever for S + L. however, it becomes more interesting when one reviews the various edits to this same Wikipedia entry. What does one notice? Why, respectful edits were entered regarding the Baum interview, to be promptly removed under the pretext of "libel" and then, "slanderous intent". I suggest you explore this when speaking about censorship. It is indeed passing strange for a reference to an interview be removed in this manner. Why is this interview being removed from Fr. Rosica's wikipedia entry? <br /><br />If you do not know about Vox's marriage - why do you bring it up? enough said. As to those who who have brought it up, not only have they objectively committed a mortal sin, they have, based on what they have written also indulged in the mortal sins of schism and heresy. <br /><br />As to annulments, "Anonymous" displays such ignorance to be staggering. Is it just ignorance or something more? Let readers be the judge. Simply,a marriage is considered valid until proven to the contrary. I find it bizarre that Mr and Mrs.Domet's holy nuptials are being questioned by those who reveal themselves as protestant in mentality, by stating "I don't agree with him...(re: the Supreme Pontiff). Are we now to pick and choose what we agree with, just because it panders to our own ideas? <br /><br />The issue is not Mr.and Mrs. Domet's marriage, but the behaviour that is gravely sinful of those who are attacking him and his wife. Baronahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06265555388172261643noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20981956.post-23512081884887557102015-03-11T18:21:15.501-04:002015-03-11T18:21:15.501-04:00Ah, but there is a difference between a personal a...Ah, but there is a difference between a personal attack and an challenge to one's ideas and that is the point. The internet has many opinions I cannot control nor do I desire to do so. However, I have a right, as you do, not to be harassed or defamed as these have done and I have a right to defend myself and put an end to it in any legal and moral fashion that I can, as do you.Vox Cantorishttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16987049370515084083noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20981956.post-10208373656245093492015-03-11T13:38:49.961-04:002015-03-11T13:38:49.961-04:00I do not think everyone is trying to attack or acc...I do not think everyone is trying to attack or accuse you personally when they do not agree with you Vox. I'm not accusing you of anything as I don't know you. The internet is full of lots of opinions. You can't control them all.Wade S.noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20981956.post-28467328562977036852015-03-11T12:34:59.470-04:002015-03-11T12:34:59.470-04:00Oh, one more thing Wade S.: "Ignorance of scr...Oh, one more thing Wade S.: "Ignorance of scripture, is ignorance of Christ." If you are "shocked" that I went to their Pastors which was actually an act of charity, then you surely are ignorant of Christ. Why not open a your Bible if you have one. Look up the passage in Matthew about "taking it to the Church." Then you might read 1 Corinthians.Vox Cantorishttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16987049370515084083noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20981956.post-71237956922338133562015-03-11T11:29:01.637-04:002015-03-11T11:29:01.637-04:00Wade S.
1. Everyone has a right to an opinions wh...Wade S.<br /><br />1. Everyone has a right to an opinions which as you know are like a certain body part which everyone has but everyone else's but your own, stinks.<br /><br />2. Free speech is about my right to write a blog, not you're right to comment. I am the Constitution around here, that being said, I have published this so that I can rebuke you.<br /><br />3. One email you will know is "anonymous" I did not release her private personal email. Second, the other leads to his blog I did not release his personal email Further, he was quite happy to put his own name out in the universe for all to see. I have a right to defend my name and that of my wife. Indeed, there was the suggestion that annulments are without basis which is not only suggesting that my wife and I are adulterers but a complete repudiation of the "binding and loosing" and that Sir, is heresy.<br /><br />4. Further, the disturbed woman that wrote that bile has engaged in a four-year long defamation against me of lies and maliciousness to hundreds of priests, deacons, seminarians, friends, strangers, colleagues and associates on an international level -- all in a vain attempt to discredit me. Well, I have had enough of her and you.<br /><br />5. You have calumniated. I NEVER said nor suggested that Father Tom Rosica was or is a "dishonest or unfaithful priest." You Sir, are a LIAR. Got that? Never have I questioned his vows or priesthood or personal holiness or behavior which would be calumny and worse. So don't come on my page and impugn my motives or suggest that I have committed such an act.<br /><br />6. YOU have impugned my motives. YOU have born False Witness against me and I will not tolerate that so you can take your bulling attempts and put it you know where.<br /><br />7. As for searching for an I.P. address, I can find yours from my Statcounter, shall I post it?<br /><br />8. I told a friend the other night, "you came on my blog five minutes ago, you're using an IPAD and Firefox and your server is located at approximately..." So, you acuse me of using police or that I am Mafiosi?<br /><br />9. You're more stupid than I imagined. Go away; I won't take your bunk here, nor will I allow you to call me son, a bastard! You stinking hypocrite.Vox Cantorishttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16987049370515084083noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20981956.post-7381153920674028392015-03-11T11:10:12.817-04:002015-03-11T11:10:12.817-04:00I agree with the commenter referring to your doubl...I agree with the commenter referring to your double standard. If you take issue with what someone says, write about it in your blog. You can’t try to censor everyone that disagrees with you. If you're right, people will see it for what it is. That is what brought you into the spotlight recently, and made many people aware of you; a famous priest took issue with what you wrote and told you to stop. You didn't and you had every right to do whatever you wanted on your blog as long as you weren’t naming people directly, which incidentally you did with two individuals' emails addresses here! I read Fr. Rosica’s issues with you and what you wrote in the past. You did use words like insidious and counter to teachings of the church tradition, etc. You WERE suggesting Rosica was dishonest and an unfaithful priest. He does a lot of good on S&L for Catholic faithful. He brings people together. The commenters never said you were divorced or commited adultery. They just said people who are married more than once should keep their mouths shut on certain matters. I don’t question your marriage because I don’t know your situation and all, but on another point which is sort of related, as the pope said annulments affect lots of people and is a sensitive topic, and opens lots of questions like, what about children out of past marriages? Are they now to tell their friends that they were conceived out of wedlock? Are they bastard children? What about a Catholic who married in an Episcopalian church, and then gets divorced with good reason? Can they get remarried in a Catholic Church? What about being married for 50 years with someone and all of a sudden you can get a church to say it never took place with an annulment? Pope Francis sees these situations and is trying to be open and honest about dealing with people. I’m honestly shocked that you went so far as to talk to the commenters’ pastors and searched their IP addresses which can search where they live?. Only the police can do things like that, and if you got a police friend to help you out, mafia style, that is WRONG. Besides, how many people were they? Maybe 4 or 5 people? Who cares?!?Wade S.noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20981956.post-26000934886775905652015-03-11T08:34:43.524-04:002015-03-11T08:34:43.524-04:00The difference between Rev.Rosica's lawsuit th...The difference between Rev.Rosica's lawsuit threat and the Vox asking NCR to remove a comment is very simple: truth. <br /><br />Rev.Rosica's threat was baseless. There was nothing specific mentioned. Basically, he doesn't like contrary opinions or being called out for error and/or improper conduct (his admiration of Gregory Baum, for example).<br /><br />The vile spewed in the NCR comments and a certain altar server's blog is libelous and heresy. <br /><br />See the difference, now?<br /><br />One thing I've noticed on my blog is how quiet some people get when they are called to a simple 'Yes' or 'No' answer. How quickly some people will throw sarcasm around yet ignore the question and these irritating things called facts. <br /><br />It's all about the truth. Some people think it's important, others don't. Kitchener Waterloo Traditional Catholichttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05841918177526232804noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20981956.post-60657595667449510652015-03-11T07:42:42.806-04:002015-03-11T07:42:42.806-04:00Dear Mr. Domet,
I viewed the text and photos of y...Dear Mr. Domet,<br /><br />I viewed the text and photos of your wedding. It was beautiful. My congratulations and fraternal wishes for many years between your bride and you.Rokehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12283563705843103267noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20981956.post-70005128953458918632015-03-10T20:37:17.230-04:002015-03-10T20:37:17.230-04:00Dear Anonymous,
A little bit of information is a ...Dear Anonymous,<br /><br />A little bit of information is a dangerous thing.<br /><br />Are you suggesting that my husband's Decree of Nullity is invalid?<br /><br />You are indeed delving into an area that is not only none of your business, but one for which you are poorly armed for the battle.<br /><br />Objectively speaking, you should consider taking this up with your pastor, in the confessional.<br /><br />Should you wish to further enter into an honest and mature discussion you may email Vox through the blog. Otherwise, drop it.Foxnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20981956.post-2797610379852834512015-03-10T19:58:28.070-04:002015-03-10T19:58:28.070-04:00Andrew, a friend in Kitchener who was also being n...Andrew, a friend in Kitchener who was also being named unjustly by our little friend wrote me to tell me the good news.<br /><br />I imagine his Pastor must have made him see the "light."<br /><br /> Vox Cantorishttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16987049370515084083noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20981956.post-9163722187021801272015-03-10T19:56:24.723-04:002015-03-10T19:56:24.723-04:00Anonymous at 17:44.
It seems to me that you are t...Anonymous at 17:44.<br /><br />It seems to me that you are taking it upon yourself to go somewhere you're not qualified to be or to dare to sit in judgment of me.<br /><br />Neither are acceptable.<br /><br />Vox Cantorishttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16987049370515084083noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20981956.post-80570806465593398892015-03-10T19:50:17.349-04:002015-03-10T19:50:17.349-04:00This unfounded accusation of adultery not only cal...This unfounded accusation of adultery not only calls us into question but also the actions of the sacred ministers who married us; Good and faithful men who would never commit such an offence.Foxnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20981956.post-84765871400421549852015-03-10T17:44:21.898-04:002015-03-10T17:44:21.898-04:00I see why you're a little sensitive.
Annulme...I see why you're a little sensitive. <br /><br />Annulment. <br /><br />According to the CNS, as late as 2009, Pope Benedict raised the issue of certain problems with the whole annulment thing:<br /><br />"Pope Benedict said there is still a need to deal with a problem Pope John Paul II pointed out in a 1987 speech to the Roman Rota, that of saving the church community from "the scandal of seeing the value of Christian marriage destroyed in practice by the exaggerated and almost automatic multiplication of declarations of nullity."<br /><br />Pope Benedict said he agreed with Pope John Paul that too often members of church tribunals see a failed marriage and grant the annulment on the basis of an ill-defined case of "immaturity or psychic weakness."<br /><br />The tribunals make the juridical determination of whether to grant a decree of nullity. The above shows that even the popes are at odds with the increasing trend of annulments for all who ask especially in western countries. Binding and loosing is another matter that doesn't apply here. <br /><br />Pope Francis recently said that 50% of marriages are invalid. I don't agree with him for first marriages, but he may very well be underestimating for subsequent marriages even after these decrees of nullity are given.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20981956.post-64873532363934640562015-03-10T17:38:48.021-04:002015-03-10T17:38:48.021-04:00Said link and related material has been purged - n...Said link and related material has been purged - no need to post this update, just FYI. PaxAnonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09167462621564913926noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20981956.post-21668089018448087572015-03-10T17:33:58.384-04:002015-03-10T17:33:58.384-04:00Anonymous Anonymous said...
Why is your marriage a...Anonymous Anonymous said...<br />Why is your marriage an issue? Is there a missing detail here?<br /><br />Tuesday, 10 March 2015 at 17:04:00 GMT-4<br /><br />There is no issue with my marriage. The issue is the National Catholic Register printed a slander piece with a link to a disturbed man who for four years has harassed me and has now harassed my wife with bile that insinuates the we are committing adultery and that the Church - Peter has no authority over binding and loosing.<br /><br />I have a right to my good name and my wife to her honour.<br /><br />Do you have issue with that?Vox Cantorishttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16987049370515084083noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20981956.post-73423735045574448602015-03-10T17:29:02.635-04:002015-03-10T17:29:02.635-04:00Dear Steve,
If I learnt anything advising federal...Dear Steve,<br /><br />If I learnt anything advising federal and provincial cabinet ministers in Canada on communications it was this, “confront the s.o.b. head-on and speak with clarity and leave the charity for the pastors.”<br /><br />What does not make sense is for you to comment without having read every post that I have written with regards to the matter and the comment in the NCRegister. If you did, you would have seen that this wretch suggested that Pope Francis was smoking pot and sitting naked in a Jacuzzi with two other clerics one of which is known to have experimented with sodomy at least once in his life but who are we to judge? Further, you would see the vile commentary towards me which has not place in a Catholic journal. You will also note that these comments were of a personal nature and to insinuate that I acted in this manner is an outright fallacy and distortion of the truth.<br /><br />Yes, the internet is a free-for-all, but we are dealing here with the National Catholic Register owned by EWTN. They allowed a comment that clearly commits calumny and defamation against the Holy Father, two Monsginore and myself to stand. Free speech? If you admit to monitoring a comment box as they do then there is no free speech. Free speech laws are to protect us from the government, not one another. <br /><br />What you are doing is trying to draw a moral equivalence between honest and hard criticism of public statements and outright personal guile. There is no moral equivalence. Crying foul? You’re bloody well right and if you think that you’re going to come into my blog and try to bully me then I have news for you. You’re not going to be allowed to do that and you’re not going to insinuate that I somehow did what this cretin has done.<br /><br />No Sir not here and not on my blog.Vox Cantorishttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16987049370515084083noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20981956.post-25713125589912452222015-03-10T17:04:40.641-04:002015-03-10T17:04:40.641-04:00Why is your marriage an issue? Is there a missing ...Why is your marriage an issue? Is there a missing detail here?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com